|
|
 |
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS11
|
|
|
Compact
January, 2010 |
As well as being compared against other compacts, the Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS11 is also often compared to ultra compacts, travel zooms, entry-level DSLRs and digicams. The Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS11's top rivals come from Panasonic (such as the Lumix DMC-FH8 and the Lumix DMC-FS30) and Canon (such as the PowerShot A2200 and the PowerShot A3300 IS)
Generally, some of the advantages of the Panasonic DMC-FS11 compared to other compact competitors include: it has better image stabilization (lens vs none), takes much higher resolution photos (9.8 MP vs 3.1 MP), shoots faster continuously (5.5 fps vs 1.5 fps), has a marginally larger sensor (1/2.3" 6.1x4.6mm vs 1/3.6" 5.3x4.0mm) and has significantly less shutter lag (310 ms vs 5100 ms).
However, on average it slightly lower maximum light sensitivity (1,600 ISO vs 3,200 ISO), doesn't record movies in 24p, is slightly more expensive ($308.69 vs $149.00), doesn't have a viewfinder (none vs tunnel) and is less popular.
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH8
2 years newer
$149
|
Significant advantages of the DMC-FH8 (vs the DMC-FS11)
Significant disadvantages of the DMC-FH8 (vs the DMC-FS11)
common strengths of the DMC-FH8 and DMC-FS11
|
||
|
|||
Canon PowerShot A2200
1 year newer
$91 - $142
|
Significant advantages of the A2200 (vs the DMC-FS11)
Significant disadvantages of the A2200 (vs the DMC-FS11)
common strengths of the A2200 and DMC-FS11
|
||
|
|||
Canon PowerShot A3300 IS
1 year newer
$129
|
Significant advantages of the A3300 IS (vs the DMC-FS11)
Significant disadvantages of the A3300 IS (vs the DMC-FS11)
common strengths of the A3300 IS and DMC-FS11
|
||
|
|||
Canon IXUS 220 HS
1 year newer
$270
|
Significant advantages of the IXUS 220 HS (vs the DMC-FS11)
Significant disadvantages of the IXUS 220 HS (vs the DMC-FS11)
common strengths of the IXUS 220 HS and DMC-FS11
|
||
|
|||
Nikon Coolpix 3200
6 years older
$200
|
Significant advantages of the 3200 (vs the DMC-FS11)
Significant disadvantages of the 3200 (vs the DMC-FS11)
common strengths of the 3200 and DMC-FS11
|
||
|
|||
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS10
similar age
$293
|
Significant advantages of the DMC-FS10 (vs the DMC-FS11)
Significant disadvantages of the DMC-FS10 (vs the DMC-FS11)
common strengths of the DMC-FS10 and DMC-FS11
|
||
|
|||
Generally, some of the advantages of the Panasonic DMC-FS11 compared to ultra compact competitors include: it has slightly less shutter lag (310 ms vs 1020 ms), slightly higher boost light sensitivity (6,400 ISO vs none) and significantly longer exposures (60 seconds vs 4 seconds).
However, on average it is slightly larger (compact 98x55x24 mm vs ultra compact 94x53x18 mm), significantly lower maximum light sensitivity (1,600 ISO vs 12,800 ISO), has a CCD-family sensor (CCD vs CMOS), lacks a built in HDR feature and lacks a built in panoramas.
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH2
1 year newer
$129
|
Significant advantages of the DMC-FH2 (vs the DMC-FS11)
Significant disadvantages of the DMC-FH2 (vs the DMC-FS11)
common strengths of the DMC-FH2 and DMC-FS11
|
||
|
|||
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH5
1 year newer
|
Significant advantages of the DMC-FH5 (vs the DMC-FS11)
Significant disadvantages of the DMC-FH5 (vs the DMC-FS11)
common strengths of the DMC-FH5 and DMC-FS11
|
||
|
|||
Sony Cyber-shot WX50
2 years newer
$178 - $198
|
Significant advantages of the WX50 (vs the DMC-FS11)
Significant disadvantages of the WX50 (vs the DMC-FS11)
common strengths of the WX50 and DMC-FS11
|
||
|
|||
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W310
similar age
$111 - $127
|
Significant advantages of the DSC-W310 (vs the DMC-FS11)
Significant disadvantages of the DSC-W310 (vs the DMC-FS11)
common strengths of the DSC-W310 and DMC-FS11
|
||
|
|||
Generally, some of the advantages of the Panasonic DMC-FS11 compared to travel zoom competitors include: it has a slightly wider aperture (f/2.8 vs f/3.3), is slightly smaller (compact 98x55x24 mm vs compact 103x60x33 mm), shoots faster continuously (5.5 fps vs 2.3 fps), is thinner (0.9" vs 1.1") and slightly longer exposures (60 seconds vs 8 seconds).
However, on average it has slightly less zoom (5x vs 12x), has a slightly smaller screen (2.7" vs 3.0"), doesn't have a touch screen, is older (january, 2010 vs january, 2011) and is slightly more expensive ($308.69 vs $160.68).
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS30
similar age
|
Significant advantages of the DMC-FS30 (vs the DMC-FS11)
Significant disadvantages of the DMC-FS30 (vs the DMC-FS11)
common strengths of the DMC-FS30 and DMC-FS11
|
||
|
|||
Fujifilm FinePix JZ200
2 years newer
$156 - $167
|
Significant advantages of the JZ200 (vs the DMC-FS11)
Significant disadvantages of the JZ200 (vs the DMC-FS11)
common strengths of the JZ200 and DMC-FS11
|
||
|
|||
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS33
similar age
|
Significant advantages of the DMC-FS33 (vs the DMC-FS11)
Significant disadvantages of the DMC-FS33 (vs the DMC-FS11)
common strengths of the DMC-FS33 and DMC-FS11
|
||
|
|||
Panasonic Lumix DMC-TZ7
1 year older
|
Significant advantages of the DMC-TZ7 (vs the DMC-FS11)
Significant disadvantages of the DMC-TZ7 (vs the DMC-FS11)
common strengths of the DMC-TZ7 and DMC-FS11
|
||
|
|||
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS35
1 year newer
$161
|
Significant advantages of the DMC-FS35 (vs the DMC-FS11)
Significant disadvantages of the DMC-FS35 (vs the DMC-FS11)
common strengths of the DMC-FS35 and DMC-FS11
|
||
|
|||
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS37
1 year newer
$232 - $262
|
Significant advantages of the DMC-FS37 (vs the DMC-FS11)
Significant disadvantages of the DMC-FS37 (vs the DMC-FS11)
common strengths of the DMC-FS37 and DMC-FS11
|
||
|
|||
Generally, some of the advantages of the Panasonic DMC-FS11 compared to entry-level DSLR competitors include: it has a much larger screen (2.7" vs 1.8"), has image stabilization (lens vs none), shoots faster continuously (5.5 fps vs 2.5 fps), is newer (january, 2010 vs august, 2003) and is much smaller (compact 98x55x24 mm vs professional size 132x105x77 mm).
However, on average it has a slightly lower resolution screen (230k dots vs 920k dots), doesn't record movies in 24p, has a much smaller sensor (1/2.3" 6.1x4.6mm vs APS-C 23.6x15.6mm), doesn't have a viewfinder (none vs pentaprism) and lacks and external mic jack.
Canon EOS 300D
6 years older
$1,609 (body only)
|
Significant advantages of the 300D (vs the DMC-FS11)
Significant disadvantages of the 300D (vs the DMC-FS11)
common strengths of the 300D and DMC-FS11
|
||
|
|||
Nikon D7000
8 months newer
$1,000 - $1,197 (body only)
$1,100 55-200mm lens
|
Significant advantages of the D7000 (vs the DMC-FS11)
Significant disadvantages of the D7000 (vs the DMC-FS11)
common strengths of the D7000 and DMC-FS11
|
||
|
|||
Generally, compared to digicam competitors the Panasonic DMC-FS11 has a slightly narrower aperture (f/2.8 vs f/2.5), has a significantly narrower wide angle lens (28 mm vs 25 mm), lacks a built in panoramas, is older (january, 2010 vs january, 2012) and is significantly more expensive ($308.69 vs $99.00).
Samsung ST ST76
2 years newer
$99
|
Significant advantages of the ST76 (vs the DMC-FS11)
Significant disadvantages of the ST76 (vs the DMC-FS11)
common strengths of the ST76 and DMC-FS11
|
||
|
|||
Samsung ST66
2 years newer
$155 - $156
|
Significant advantages of the ST66 (vs the DMC-FS11)
Significant disadvantages of the ST66 (vs the DMC-FS11)
common strengths of the ST66 and DMC-FS11
|
||
|
|||
