|
|
 |
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS10
|
|
|
Compact
January, 2010 |
As well as being compared against other compacts, the Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS10 is also often compared to travel zooms and ultra compacts. The Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS10's top rivals come from Panasonic (such as the Lumix DMC-FP3 and the Lumix DMC-FH2) and Canon (such as the IXUS 115 HS and the IXUS 220 HS)
Generally, some of the advantages of the Panasonic DMC-FS10 compared to other compact competitors include: it has a slightly wider aperture (f/2.8 vs f/3.5), has a slightly wider wide angle lens (28 mm vs 35 mm), has better image stabilization (lens vs sensor shift), slightly higher boost light sensitivity (6,400 ISO vs none) and has a faster max shutter speed (1/1600 of a second vs 1/1200 of a second).
However, on average it records lower quality movies (720p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 24fps), has a slightly smaller screen (2.7" vs 3.0"), doesn't record high-speed movies (none vs 240 fps), slightly lower maximum light sensitivity (1,600 ISO vs 3,200 ISO) and doesn't record movies in 24p.
Pentax Optio P80
5 months older
|
Significant advantages of the P80 (vs the DMC-FS10)
Significant disadvantages of the P80 (vs the DMC-FS10)
common strengths of the P80 and DMC-FS10
|
||
|
|||
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FP3
similar age
$183
|
Significant advantages of the DMC-FP3 (vs the DMC-FS10)
Significant disadvantages of the DMC-FP3 (vs the DMC-FS10)
common strengths of the DMC-FP3 and DMC-FS10
|
||
|
|||
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FP1
similar age
$142
|
Significant advantages of the DMC-FP1 (vs the DMC-FS10)
Significant disadvantages of the DMC-FP1 (vs the DMC-FS10)
common strengths of the DMC-FP1 and DMC-FS10
|
||
|
|||
Canon IXUS 115 HS
1 year newer
$193 - $241
|
Significant advantages of the IXUS 115 HS (vs the DMC-FS10)
Significant disadvantages of the IXUS 115 HS (vs the DMC-FS10)
common strengths of the IXUS 115 HS and DMC-FS10
|
||
|
|||
Canon IXUS 220 HS
1 year newer
$270
|
Significant advantages of the IXUS 220 HS (vs the DMC-FS10)
Significant disadvantages of the IXUS 220 HS (vs the DMC-FS10)
common strengths of the IXUS 220 HS and DMC-FS10
|
||
|
|||
Olympus TG-610
1 year newer
$229 - $250
|
Significant advantages of the TG-610 (vs the DMC-FS10)
Significant disadvantages of the TG-610 (vs the DMC-FS10)
common strengths of the TG-610 and DMC-FS10
|
||
|
|||
Generally, some of the advantages of the Panasonic DMC-FS10 compared to travel zoom competitors include: it has a slightly wider aperture (f/2.8 vs f/3.3), is significantly smaller (super compact 98x55x23 mm vs compact 105x58x33 mm), is thinner (0.9" vs 1.3"), is slightly lighter (163 g vs 206 g) and is slightly less expensive ($293.18 vs $433.87).
However, on average it has much less zoom (5x vs 15x), has a significantly narrower wide angle lens (28 mm vs 24 mm), doesn't have a built-in GPS, records lower quality movies (720p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps) and has a slightly smaller screen (2.7" vs 3.0").
Panasonic Lumix DMC-TZ18
1 year newer
$272 - $305
|
Significant advantages of the DMC-TZ18 (vs the DMC-FS10)
Significant disadvantages of the DMC-TZ18 (vs the DMC-FS10)
common strengths of the DMC-TZ18 and DMC-FS10
|
||
|
|||
Panasonic Lumix DMC-TZ10
similar age
$650
|
Significant advantages of the DMC-TZ10 (vs the DMC-FS10)
Significant disadvantages of the DMC-TZ10 (vs the DMC-FS10)
common strengths of the DMC-TZ10 and DMC-FS10
|
||
|
|||
Fujifilm FinePix F550 EXR
1 year newer
$248
|
Significant advantages of the F550 EXR (vs the DMC-FS10)
Significant disadvantages of the F550 EXR (vs the DMC-FS10)
common strengths of the F550 EXR and DMC-FS10
|
||
|
|||
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS30
similar age
|
Significant advantages of the DMC-FS30 (vs the DMC-FS10)
Significant disadvantages of the DMC-FS30 (vs the DMC-FS10)
common strengths of the DMC-FS30 and DMC-FS10
|
||
|
|||
Panasonic Lumix TZ30
2 years newer
$434 - $474
|
Significant advantages of the TZ30 (vs the DMC-FS10)
Significant disadvantages of the TZ30 (vs the DMC-FS10)
common strengths of the TZ30 and DMC-FS10
|
||
|
|||
Olympus VR320
1 year newer
$145
|
Significant advantages of the VR320 (vs the DMC-FS10)
Significant disadvantages of the VR320 (vs the DMC-FS10)
common strengths of the VR320 and DMC-FS10
|
||
|
|||
Generally, some of the advantages of the Panasonic DMC-FS10 compared to ultra compact competitors include: it has a slightly wider aperture (f/2.8 vs f/3.1), has better image stabilization (lens vs none), shoots faster continuously (5.5 fps vs 1 fps), slightly higher boost light sensitivity (6,400 ISO vs none) and much longer exposures (60 seconds vs 4 seconds).
However, on average it is slightly larger (super compact 98x55x23 mm vs ultra compact 91x52x17 mm), lacks a built in panoramas, is older (january, 2010 vs january, 2011), is thicker (0.9" vs 0.7") and is slightly heavier (163 g vs 118 g).
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH2
1 year newer
$129
|
Significant advantages of the DMC-FH2 (vs the DMC-FS10)
Significant disadvantages of the DMC-FH2 (vs the DMC-FS10)
common strengths of the DMC-FH2 and DMC-FS10
|
||
|
|||
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W350
similar age
$164 - $183
|
Significant advantages of the DSC-W350 (vs the DMC-FS10)
Significant disadvantages of the DSC-W350 (vs the DMC-FS10)
common strengths of the DSC-W350 and DMC-FS10
|
||
|
|||
Nikon Coolpix S3100
1 year newer
$104
|
Significant advantages of the S3100 (vs the DMC-FS10)
Significant disadvantages of the S3100 (vs the DMC-FS10)
common strengths of the S3100 and DMC-FS10
|
||
|
|||
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH5
1 year newer
|
Significant advantages of the DMC-FH5 (vs the DMC-FS10)
Significant disadvantages of the DMC-FH5 (vs the DMC-FS10)
common strengths of the DMC-FH5 and DMC-FS10
|
||
|
|||
Sony Cybershot DSC-W530
1 year newer
$171
|
Significant advantages of the DSC-W530 (vs the DMC-FS10)
Significant disadvantages of the DSC-W530 (vs the DMC-FS10)
common strengths of the DSC-W530 and DMC-FS10
|
||
|
|||
Olympus mju 1040
1 year older
|
Significant advantages of the mju 1040 (vs the DMC-FS10)
Significant disadvantages of the mju 1040 (vs the DMC-FS10)
common strengths of the mju 1040 and DMC-FS10
|
||
|
|||
