Generally, some of the advantages of the Panasonic DMC-F2 compared to travel zoom competitors include: it has a slightly wider aperture (f/2.8 vs f/3.5), is significantly smaller (compact (98×55×25 mm) vs compact (106×63×33 mm)), is thinner (1" vs 1.3"), is significantly lighter (136 g vs 233 g) and much longer exposures (60 seconds vs 15 seconds).
However, on average it has slightly less zoom (4x vs 20x), has a much narrower wide angle lens (33 mm vs 25 mm), has a slightly smaller screen (2.5" vs 3"), has a slightly lower resolution screen (230k dots vs 461k dots) and doesn't have image stabilization (none vs lens).
Canon PowerShot SX270 HS
3 years newer
$237
Significant advantages of the SX270 HS (vs the DMC-F2)
- Much better wide angle: 25 mm vs 33 mm
- Image stabilization:
- Lens
vs None - Has a CMOS-family sensor: CMOS vs CCD
Significant disadvantages of the SX270 HS (vs the DMC-F2)
- Significantly larger: Compact (106×63×33 mm) vs Compact (98×55×25 mm)
- Significantly thicker: 1.3" vs 1"
- Significantly heavier: 233 g vs 136 g
common strengths of the SX270 HS and DMC-F2
- Fairly small: Compact (106×63×33 mm) vs Compact (98×55×25 mm)
- Very thin: 1.3" vs 1"
- Light weight: 233 g vs 136 g