Panasonic Lumix DMC-TS4

Panasonic Lumix TS4
Waterproof Waterproof, Compact
January, 2012

Summary Panasonic TS4

Prices Price
Camera only $240 - $250
all TS4 prices
Score Snapsort rank
Within its price range #4 of 19 Among similar cameras #12 of 33
details details
Specifications Key specs
Zoom Help 4.6x Screen size Help 2.7"
Aperture Help f/3.3 Screen resolution Help 230k dots
Wide angle Help 28 mm Movie format Help 1080p @ 60fps
see all specifications

Also known as: Panasonic Lumix DMC-FT4

Panasonic Lumix DMC-TS4Panasonic Lumix DMC-TS4

Replacement

Panasonic has replaced the Lumix TS4 with the TS5.

Panasonic TS5/FT5
Panasonic TS5/FT5 announced January, 2013
Screen size Significantly larger screen
HDR Has in-camera HDR
Sensor type Has a CMOS-family sensor

Compare the new Panasonic TS5 vs the TS4

Pros

The Panasonic TS4 vs other recent waterproof cameras

Focus points Many focus points Help
23
GPS Built-in GPS Help
Great for travel
Longest exposure Very long exposures Help
60 seconds
Image stabilization Image stabilization Help
Lens
Battery life Above average battery life Help
310 shots
3D Takes 3D photos Help
View photos in 3D on 3D televisions

Cons

The Panasonic TS4 vs other recent waterproof cameras

Wide angle Poor wide angle lens Help
28 mm
Sensor type Sensor type Help
CCD
HDR Lacks in-camera HDR Help
You could do HDR manually
Fastest shutter speed Slow shutter speed Help
1/1300 of a second
Screen size Below average sized screen Help
2.7"
Screen resolution Low resolution screen Help
230k dots
Light sensitivity Poor maximum light sensitivity Help
1,600 ISO
Announced Old Help
January, 2012

Appearance

front photo of the Panasonic Lumix DMC-TS4back photo of the Panasonic Lumix DMC-TS4angle photo of the Panasonic Lumix DMC-TS4

Discussion What do you think about the Panasonic Lumix DMC-TS4?

Speech is free, but discussion at Snapsort is moderated! Please discuss your opinion of this camera here, and discuss feedback for Snapsort at our support community.

Showing 1 comments

tt (2:52 PM, March 14, 2012)
Correction:  Sensor size is 1/2.33" not 1/2.5"