As well as being compared against other super zooms, the Panasonic Lumix FZ72 is also often compared to entry-level DSLRs, pro digicams and travel zooms. The Panasonic Lumix FZ72's top rivals come from Canon (such as the PowerShot SX50 HS and the PowerShot SX510 HS) and Panasonic (such as the Lumix DMC-FZ200 and the Lumix DMC-FZ60)

compared toSuper zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Panasonic FZ72 compared to other super zoom competitors include: it has much more zoom (60x vs 41.7x), has a slightly wider wide angle lens (20 mm vs 25 mm), captures 3D images, has a slightly longer battery life (400 shots vs 330 shots) and is newer (july, 2013 vs january, 2013).

However, on average it has a slightly lower resolution screen (460k dots vs 920k dots), is slightly larger (large 130x97x118 mm vs professional size 123x87x106 mm), doesn't record high-speed movies (none vs 240 fps), doesn't record movies in 24p and doesn't have a screen which flips out.

Canon PowerShot SX50 HS

Canon PowerShot SX50 HS
10 months older
$399 - $400

Significant advantages of the PowerShot SX50 HS (vs the FZ72)

  • Supports 24p
  • Has a flip-out screen
  • Records high-speed movies: 240 fps vs None

Significant disadvantages of the PowerShot SX50 HS (vs the FZ72)

  • Narrower aperture: f/3.4 vs f/2.8
  • Significantly less zoom: 50x vs 60x
  • Doesn't take 3D photos

common strengths of the PowerShot SX50 HS and FZ72

  • Great zoom: 50x vs 60x
  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS
  • In-camera HDR
arrow Compare the Canon PowerShot SX50 HS vs the Panasonic Lumix FZ72

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200
1 year older
$405 - $598

Significant advantages of the DMC-FZ200 (vs the FZ72)

  • Has a flip-out screen
  • Has an external mic jack
  • Records high-speed movies: 240 fps vs None

Significant disadvantages of the DMC-FZ200 (vs the FZ72)

  • Much less zoom: 24x vs 60x
  • Worse wide angle: 25 mm vs 20 mm

common strengths of the DMC-FZ200 and FZ72

  • Both can take 3D photos, many cameras like these don't
  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS
  • In-camera HDR
arrow Compare the DMC-FZ200 vs the FZ72

Nikon Coolpix P600

Nikon Coolpix P600
6 months newer
$447

Significant advantages of the P600 (vs the FZ72)

  • Significantly higher resolution screen: 921k dots vs 460k dots
  • Has a flip-out screen
  • Has an external mic jack

Significant disadvantages of the P600 (vs the FZ72)

  • Doesn't take 3D photos
  • No RAW support
  • No external flash support

common strengths of the P600 and FZ72

  • Incredible zoom: 60x vs 60x
  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS
  • In-camera HDR
arrow Compare the Nikon Coolpix P600 vs the Panasonic Lumix FZ72

Sony Cyber-Shot DSC-HX300

Sony Cyber-Shot DSC-HX300
4 months older
$398 - $400

Significant advantages of the DSC-HX300 (vs the FZ72)

  • Significantly higher resolution screen: 921k dots vs 460k dots
  • Better boost ISO: 12,800 ISO vs 6,400 ISO

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-HX300 (vs the FZ72)

  • Significantly less zoom: 50x vs 60x
  • No RAW support
  • No external flash support

common strengths of the DSC-HX300 and FZ72

  • Great zoom: 50x vs 60x
  • Both can take 3D photos, many cameras like these don't
  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS
arrow Compare the Sony Cyber-Shot DSC-HX300 vs the Panasonic Lumix FZ72

Nikon Coolpix P520

Nikon Coolpix P520
5 months older
$321 - $376

Significant advantages of the P520 (vs the FZ72)

  • Significantly higher resolution screen: 921k dots vs 460k dots
  • Has a flip-out screen
  • Has a GPS

Significant disadvantages of the P520 (vs the FZ72)

  • Much less zoom: 41.7x vs 60x
  • Significantly shorter battery life: 200 shots vs 400 shots
  • No external flash support

common strengths of the P520 and FZ72

  • Both can take 3D photos, many cameras like these don't
  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS
  • In-camera HDR
arrow Compare the Nikon Coolpix P520 vs the Panasonic Lumix FZ72

Fujifilm FinePix SL1000

Fujifilm FinePix SL1000
6 months older
$249 - $305

Significant advantages of the SL1000 (vs the FZ72)

  • Records high-speed movies: 480 fps vs None
  • Significantly higher resolution screen: 920k dots vs 460k dots
  • Has a flip-out screen

Significant disadvantages of the SL1000 (vs the FZ72)

  • Significantly less zoom: 50x vs 60x

common strengths of the SL1000 and FZ72

  • Great zoom: 50x vs 60x
  • Both can take 3D photos, many cameras like these don't
  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS
arrow Compare the Fujifilm FinePix SL1000 vs the Panasonic Lumix FZ72

compared toEntry-level DSLR competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Panasonic FZ72 compared to entry-level DSLR competitors include: it records higher quality movies (1080p @ 30fps vs 720p @ 30fps), has image stabilization (lens vs none), shoots faster continuously (9 fps vs 3.7 fps), has in-camera HDR and creates panoramas in-camera.

However, on average it has a slightly lower resolution screen (460k dots vs 921k dots), takes much lower resolution photos (9.7 MP vs 24.1 MP), doesn't record movies in 24p, doesn't have a screen which flips out and has a much smaller sensor (1/2.3" 6.2x4.6mm vs APS-C 23.1x15.4mm).

Nikon D3200

Nikon D3200
1 year older
$497 18-55mm lens

Significant advantages of the D3200 (vs the FZ72)

  • Much larger sensor: APS-C 23.2x15.4mm vs 1/2.3" 6.2x4.6mm
  • Much higher true resolution: 24.2 MP vs 9.7 MP
  • Faster autofocus: Phase detection vs Contrast detection

Significant disadvantages of the D3200 (vs the FZ72)

  • No image stabilization: None vs Lens
  • Lacks in-camera HDR
  • Shoots much slower: 4 fps vs 9 fps

common strengths of the D3200 and FZ72

  • Inexpensive: $496.95 vs $413.54
arrow Compare the Nikon D3200 vs the Panasonic Lumix FZ72

Canon EOS 600D

Canon EOS 600D
2 years older
$520 18-55mm lens

Significant advantages of the 600D (vs the FZ72)

  • Much larger sensor: APS-C 22.3x14.9mm vs 1/2.3" 6.2x4.6mm
  • Much higher resolution screen: 1,040k dots vs 460k dots
  • Faster autofocus: Phase detection vs Contrast detection

Significant disadvantages of the 600D (vs the FZ72)

  • No image stabilization: None vs Lens
  • Shoots much slower: 3.7 fps vs 9 fps
  • Doesn't take 3D photos

common strengths of the 600D and FZ72

  • Inexpensive: $519.99 vs $413.54
arrow Compare the Canon EOS 600D vs the Panasonic Lumix FZ72

Nikon D3100

Nikon D3100
2 years older
$389 - $427 18-55mm lens

Significant advantages of the D3100 (vs the FZ72)

  • Much larger sensor: APS-C 23.1x15.4mm vs 1/2.3" 6.2x4.6mm
  • Faster autofocus: Phase detection vs Contrast detection
  • Much smaller: Prosumer size 124x96x73 mm vs Large 130x97x118 mm

Significant disadvantages of the D3100 (vs the FZ72)

  • No image stabilization: None vs Lens
  • Shoots much slower: 3 fps vs 9 fps
  • Lacks in-camera HDR

common strengths of the D3100 and FZ72

  • Inexpensive: $284.99 vs $413.54
arrow Compare the Nikon D3100 vs the Panasonic Lumix FZ72

Canon EOS 1100D

Canon EOS 1100D
2 years older
$435 18-55mm lens

Significant advantages of the 1100D (vs the FZ72)

  • Much larger sensor: APS-C 22.2x14.7mm vs 1/2.3" 6.2x4.6mm
  • Faster autofocus: Phase detection vs Contrast detection
  • Much smaller: Professional size 130x100x78 mm vs Large 130x97x118 mm

Significant disadvantages of the 1100D (vs the FZ72)

  • Lower resolution movies: 720p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps
  • Significantly smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.0"
  • No image stabilization: None vs Lens

common strengths of the 1100D and FZ72

  • Inexpensive: $435.45 vs $413.54
arrow Compare the Canon EOS 1100D vs the Panasonic Lumix FZ72

Nikon D5200

Nikon D5200
8 months older
$647 (body only)
$650 - $747 18-55mm lens

Significant advantages of the D5200 (vs the FZ72)

  • Much larger sensor: APS-C 23.5x15.6mm vs 1/2.3" 6.2x4.6mm
  • Lower frame rate movies: 1080p @ 60fps vs 1080p @ 30fps
  • Much higher true resolution: 24.1 MP vs 9.7 MP

Significant disadvantages of the D5200 (vs the FZ72)

  • No image stabilization: None vs Lens
  • Lacks in-camera panoramic stitching
  • Shoots significantly slower: 5 fps vs 9 fps

common strengths of the D5200 and FZ72

  • Both can take 3D photos, many cameras like these don't
arrow Compare the Nikon D5200 vs the Panasonic Lumix FZ72

compared toPro digicam competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Panasonic FZ72 compared to pro digicam competitors include: it has way more more zoom (60x vs 3.6x), has a significantly wider wide angle lens (20 mm vs 28 mm), captures 3D images, has a slightly longer battery life (400 shots vs 330 shots) and slightly closer macro focusing (1 cm vs 5 cm).

However, on average it has a much smaller sensor (1/2.3" 6.2x4.6mm vs nikon CX 13.2x8.8mm), has a much narrower aperture (f/2.8 vs f/1.4), has a much lower resolution screen (460k dots vs 1,229k dots), is much larger (large 130x97x118 mm vs compact 101x58x35 mm) and takes much lower resolution photos (9.7 MP vs 20 MP).

Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX7

Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX7
1 year older
$398

Significant advantages of the DMC-LX7 (vs the FZ72)

  • Much wider aperture: f/1.4 vs f/2.8
  • Much smaller: Mid size 111x68x46 mm vs Large 130x97x118 mm
  • Larger sensor: 1/1.8" 7.4x5.6mm vs 1/2.3" 6.2x4.6mm

Significant disadvantages of the DMC-LX7 (vs the FZ72)

  • Much less zoom: 3.8x vs 60x
  • No viewfinder: None vs Digital

common strengths of the DMC-LX7 and FZ72

  • Supports RAW
  • Good wide angle: 24 mm vs 20 mm
  • Both can take 3D photos, many cameras like these don't
arrow Compare the DMC-LX7 vs the FZ72

Sony Cybershot DSC-RX100

Sony Cybershot DSC-RX100
1 year older
$548

Significant advantages of the DSC-RX100 (vs the FZ72)

  • Much larger sensor: Nikon CX 13.2x8.8mm vs 1/2.3" 6.2x4.6mm
  • Significantly wider aperture: f/1.8 vs f/2.8
  • Much higher true resolution: 20 MP vs 9.7 MP

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-RX100 (vs the FZ72)

  • Much less zoom: 3.6x vs 60x
  • Significantly worse wide angle: 28 mm vs 20 mm
  • Doesn't take 3D photos

common strengths of the DSC-RX100 and FZ72

  • Supports RAW
  • In-camera panoramas
  • In-camera HDR
arrow Compare the Sony Cybershot DSC-RX100 vs the Panasonic Lumix FZ72

compared toTravel zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Panasonic FZ72 compared to travel zoom competitors include: it has way more more zoom (60x vs 20x), has a slightly wider wide angle lens (20 mm vs 24 mm), has a slightly wider aperture (f/2.8 vs f/3.5), slightly closer macro focusing (1 cm vs 5 cm) and is newer (july, 2013 vs january, 2013).

However, on average it doesn't have a built-in GPS, has a significantly lower resolution screen (460k dots vs 921k dots), is much larger (large 130x97x118 mm vs compact 105x59x28 mm), doesn't record high-speed movies (none vs 220 fps) and doesn't have a touch screen.

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX50V

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX50V
similar age
$345 - $398

Significant advantages of the DSC-HX50V (vs the FZ72)

  • Has a GPS
  • Much smaller: Mid size 108x64x38 mm vs Large 130x97x118 mm
  • Significantly higher resolution screen: 921k dots vs 460k dots

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-HX50V (vs the FZ72)

  • Much less zoom: 30x vs 60x
  • Significantly narrower aperture: f/3.5 vs f/2.8
  • Significantly worse macro capability: 5 cm vs 1 cm

common strengths of the DSC-HX50V and FZ72

  • Great zoom: 30x vs 60x
  • Both can take 3D photos, many cameras like these don't
  • In-camera HDR
arrow Compare the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX50V vs the Panasonic Lumix FZ72

Panasonic Lumix TZ40

Panasonic Lumix TZ40
6 months older
$150

Significant advantages of the TZ40 (vs the FZ72)

  • Has a GPS
  • Much smaller: Compact 105x59x28 mm vs Large 130x97x118 mm
  • Significantly higher resolution screen: 920k dots vs 460k dots

Significant disadvantages of the TZ40 (vs the FZ72)

  • Much less zoom: 20x vs 60x
  • No RAW support
  • No external flash support

common strengths of the TZ40 and FZ72

  • Both can take 3D photos, many cameras like these don't
  • In-camera HDR
  • In-camera panoramas
arrow Compare the Lumix TZ40 vs the Lumix FZ72