As well as being compared against other travel zooms, the Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS80 (Lumix DC-TZ95) is also often compared to mirrorless, boutiques, super zooms and pro digicams. The Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS80 (Lumix DC-TZ95)'s top rivals come from Nikon (such as the Coolpix A1000 and the Coolpix B600) and Fujifilm (such as the X-T30 and the X-E3)

compared toTravel zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS80 (Lumix DC-TZ95) compared to other travel zoom competitors include: it has a screen which flips out, has a significantly longer battery life (380 shots vs 300 shots), is newer (february 2019 vs april 2017) and is more popular.

However, on average it takes slightly lower resolution photos (9.7 MP vs 20 MP), slightly lower maximum light sensitivity (6,400 ISO vs 25,600 ISO), doesn't shoot as fast continuously (10 fps vs 24 fps), has a slightly smaller sensor (1/2.3" 6.17x4.55mm vs nikon CX 13.2x8.8mm) and users slower contrast detection autofocus (contrast detection vs phase detection).

Nikon Coolpix A1000

Placeholder
similar age
$477

Significant advantages of the Coolpix A1000 (vs the Lumix DC-ZS80 (Lumix DC-TZ95))

  • Significantly faster max shutter speed: 1/4000 of a second vs 1/2000 of a second

Significant disadvantages of the Coolpix A1000 (vs the Lumix DC-ZS80 (Lumix DC-TZ95))

  • Much shorter battery life: 250 shots vs 380 shots

common strengths of the Coolpix A1000 and Lumix DC-ZS80 (Lumix DC-TZ95)

  • Announced: January 2019 vs February 2019
  • Popularity: 508 vs 789

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX99

Placeholder
5 months older
$448

Significant advantages of the Cyber-shot DSC-HX99 (vs the Lumix DC-ZS80 (Lumix DC-TZ95))

  • Longer exposures: 30 seconds vs 4 seconds

Significant disadvantages of the Cyber-shot DSC-HX99 (vs the Lumix DC-ZS80 (Lumix DC-TZ95))

  • None found

common strengths of the Cyber-shot DSC-HX99 and Lumix DC-ZS80 (Lumix DC-TZ95)

  • None found

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 VI

Placeholder
8 months older
$1,198

Significant advantages of the Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 VI (vs the Lumix DC-ZS80 (Lumix DC-TZ95))

  • Wider aperture: f/2.8 vs f/3.3
  • Faster autofocus: Phase detection vs Contrast detection
  • Much higher true resolution: 20 MP vs 9.7 MP

Significant disadvantages of the Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 VI (vs the Lumix DC-ZS80 (Lumix DC-TZ95))

  • Much shorter battery life: 240 shots vs 380 shots

common strengths of the Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 VI and Lumix DC-ZS80 (Lumix DC-TZ95)

  • None found

Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS70 (Lumix DC-TZ90)

Placeholder
1 year older

Significant advantages of the Lumix DC-ZS70 (Lumix DC-TZ90) (vs the Lumix DC-ZS80 (Lumix DC-TZ95))

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the Lumix DC-ZS70 (Lumix DC-TZ90) (vs the Lumix DC-ZS80 (Lumix DC-TZ95))

  • None found

common strengths of the Lumix DC-ZS70 (Lumix DC-TZ90) and Lumix DC-ZS80 (Lumix DC-TZ95)

  • Great battery life: 380 shots vs 380 shots

Leica C-Lux

Placeholder
8 months older
$999 - $1,050

Significant advantages of the C-Lux (vs the Lumix DC-ZS80 (Lumix DC-TZ95))

  • Better maximum light sensitivity: 25,600 ISO vs 6,400 ISO
  • Much higher true resolution: 20 MP vs 9.7 MP
  • Much larger sensor: Nikon CX 13.2x8.8mm vs 1/2.3" 6.17x4.55mm

Significant disadvantages of the C-Lux (vs the Lumix DC-ZS80 (Lumix DC-TZ95))

  • Screen does not flip out

common strengths of the C-Lux and Lumix DC-ZS80 (Lumix DC-TZ95)

  • Great battery life: 370 shots vs 380 shots

Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS100 (Lumix DMC-TZ100)

Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS100 (Lumix DMC-TZ100)
3 years older

Significant advantages of the Lumix DMC-ZS100 (Lumix DMC-TZ100) (vs the Lumix DC-ZS80 (Lumix DC-TZ95))

  • Shoots much faster: 50 fps vs 10 fps
  • Wider aperture: f/2.8 vs f/3.3
  • Better maximum light sensitivity: 25,600 ISO vs 6,400 ISO

Significant disadvantages of the Lumix DMC-ZS100 (Lumix DMC-TZ100) (vs the Lumix DC-ZS80 (Lumix DC-TZ95))

  • Screen does not flip out
  • Significantly shorter battery life: 300 shots vs 380 shots

common strengths of the Lumix DMC-ZS100 (Lumix DMC-TZ100) and Lumix DC-ZS80 (Lumix DC-TZ95)

  • None found

compared toMirrorless interchangeable-lens competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS80 (Lumix DC-TZ95) compared to mirrorless interchangeable-lens competitors include: it has better image stabilization (lens vs sensor shift), has a touch screen, has a screen which flips out, is newer (february 2019 vs september 2017) and is slightly smaller (mid size (112×69×42 mm) vs large (144×147×75 mm)).

However, on average it much smaller viewfinder (0.09x vs 0.70x), takes much lower resolution photos (9.7 MP vs 24 MP), slightly lower maximum light sensitivity (6,400 ISO vs 51,200 ISO), doesn't shoot as fast continuously (10 fps vs 30 fps) and has a slightly smaller sensor (1/2.3" 6.17x4.55mm vs APS-C 23.5x15.6mm).

Fujifilm X-T30

Placeholder
similar age
$899 (body only)
$999 - $1,039 15-45mm lens

Significant advantages of the X-T30 (vs the Lumix DC-ZS80 (Lumix DC-TZ95))

  • Much larger viewfinder: 0.61x vs 0.09x
  • Much higher true resolution: 26 MP vs 9.7 MP
  • Has interchangeable lenses

Significant disadvantages of the X-T30 (vs the Lumix DC-ZS80 (Lumix DC-TZ95))

  • None found

common strengths of the X-T30 and Lumix DC-ZS80 (Lumix DC-TZ95)

  • Announced: February 2019 vs February 2019
  • Fairly small: Standard size (118×83×47 mm) vs Mid size (112×69×42 mm)
  • Light weight: 383 g vs 327 g

Olympus OM-D E-M1X

Placeholder
similar age
$2,999 (body only)
$3,798 12-40mm lens

Significant advantages of the OM-D E-M1X (vs the Lumix DC-ZS80 (Lumix DC-TZ95))

  • Much larger viewfinder: 0.72x vs 0.09x
  • Shoots much faster: 60 fps vs 10 fps
  • Much longer battery life: 870 shots vs 380 shots

Significant disadvantages of the OM-D E-M1X (vs the Lumix DC-ZS80 (Lumix DC-TZ95))

  • Worse image stabilization:
    1. Sensor shift
    vs
    1. Lens
  • Much larger: Large (144×147×75 mm) vs Mid size (112×69×42 mm)
  • Much heavier: 997 g vs 327 g

common strengths of the OM-D E-M1X and Lumix DC-ZS80 (Lumix DC-TZ95)

  • Announced: January 2019 vs February 2019
  • Popularity: 319 vs 789

Sony a6400

Placeholder
similar age
$898 (body only)
$971 - $998 16-50mm lens

Significant advantages of the a6400 (vs the Lumix DC-ZS80 (Lumix DC-TZ95))

  • Much higher true resolution: 24 MP vs 9.7 MP
  • Has interchangeable lenses
  • Significantly larger viewfinder: 0.46x vs 0.09x

Significant disadvantages of the a6400 (vs the Lumix DC-ZS80 (Lumix DC-TZ95))

  • None found

common strengths of the a6400 and Lumix DC-ZS80 (Lumix DC-TZ95)

  • Announced: January 2019 vs February 2019
  • Light weight: 403 g vs 327 g
  • Popularity: 647 vs 789

Fujifilm X-E3

Placeholder
1 year older
$649 - $699 (body only)
$880 - $999 18-55mm lens

Significant advantages of the X-E3 (vs the Lumix DC-ZS80 (Lumix DC-TZ95))

  • Much larger viewfinder: 0.61x vs 0.09x
  • Much higher true resolution: 24 MP vs 9.7 MP
  • Has interchangeable lenses

Significant disadvantages of the X-E3 (vs the Lumix DC-ZS80 (Lumix DC-TZ95))

  • Screen does not flip out
  • No built-in flash

common strengths of the X-E3 and Lumix DC-ZS80 (Lumix DC-TZ95)

  • Fairly small: Mid size (121×74×43 mm) vs Mid size (112×69×42 mm)
  • Light weight: 337 g vs 327 g
  • Thin: 1.7" vs 1.7"

Canon EOS M100

Placeholder
1 year older
$379 (body only)
$449 15-45mm lens

Significant advantages of the EOS M100 (vs the Lumix DC-ZS80 (Lumix DC-TZ95))

  • Much higher true resolution: 24 MP vs 9.7 MP
  • Has interchangeable lenses
  • Faster autofocus: Phase detection vs Contrast detection

Significant disadvantages of the EOS M100 (vs the Lumix DC-ZS80 (Lumix DC-TZ95))

  • No viewfinder: None vs Digital

common strengths of the EOS M100 and Lumix DC-ZS80 (Lumix DC-TZ95)

  • Fairly small: Mid size (108×67×35 mm) vs Mid size (112×69×42 mm)
  • Thin: 1.4" vs 1.7"
  • Light weight: 302 g vs 327 g

Sony Alpha A6000

Sony Alpha A6000
5 years older
$379 - $498 (body only)
$479 - $598 16-50mm lens

Significant advantages of the A6000 (vs the Lumix DC-ZS80 (Lumix DC-TZ95))

  • Much larger viewfinder: 0.70x vs 0.09x
  • Much higher true resolution: 24 MP vs 9.7 MP
  • Has interchangeable lenses

Significant disadvantages of the A6000 (vs the Lumix DC-ZS80 (Lumix DC-TZ95))

  • No touch screen

common strengths of the A6000 and Lumix DC-ZS80 (Lumix DC-TZ95)

  • Very good image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs
    1. Lens
  • Fairly small: Mid size (120×67×45 mm) vs Mid size (112×69×42 mm)
  • Light weight: 285 g vs 327 g

compared toBoutique competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS80 (Lumix DC-TZ95) compared to boutique competitors include: it has way more more zoom (30x vs 3.1x), has better image stabilization (lens vs sensor shift), has a touch screen, has a screen which flips out and has a slightly longer battery life (380 shots vs 300 shots).

However, on average it has a significantly narrower aperture (f/3.3 vs f/1.7), takes slightly lower resolution photos (9.7 MP vs 24 MP), has a marginally smaller sensor (1/2.3" 6.17x4.55mm vs APS-C 23.5x15.6mm), slightly smaller viewfinder (0.09x vs 0.67x) and users slower contrast detection autofocus (contrast detection vs phase detection).

Ricoh GR III

Placeholder
4 months older
$900

Significant advantages of the GR III (vs the Lumix DC-ZS80 (Lumix DC-TZ95))

  • Faster autofocus: Phase detection vs Contrast detection
  • Significantly higher true resolution: 24 MP vs 9.7 MP
  • Supports an external flash

Significant disadvantages of the GR III (vs the Lumix DC-ZS80 (Lumix DC-TZ95))

  • Worse image stabilization:
    1. Sensor shift
    vs
    1. Lens
  • Screen does not flip out
  • No built-in flash

common strengths of the GR III and Lumix DC-ZS80 (Lumix DC-TZ95)

  • Fairly small: Compact (109×62×33 mm) vs Mid size (112×69×42 mm)
  • Thin: 1.3" vs 1.7"
  • Light weight: 257 g vs 327 g

Fujifilm XF10

Placeholder
7 months older
$449

Significant advantages of the XF10 (vs the Lumix DC-ZS80 (Lumix DC-TZ95))

  • Faster autofocus: Phase detection vs Contrast detection
  • Has an external mic jack
  • Significantly higher true resolution: 24 MP vs 9.7 MP

Significant disadvantages of the XF10 (vs the Lumix DC-ZS80 (Lumix DC-TZ95))

  • Screen does not flip out
  • Shoots slower: 6 fps vs 10 fps
  • No viewfinder: None vs Digital

common strengths of the XF10 and Lumix DC-ZS80 (Lumix DC-TZ95)

  • Fairly small: Mid size (113×64×41 mm) vs Mid size (112×69×42 mm)
  • Light weight: 279 g vs 327 g
  • Thin: 1.6" vs 1.7"

Leica D-Lux 7

Placeholder
3 months older
$1,195

Significant advantages of the D-Lux 7 (vs the Lumix DC-ZS80 (Lumix DC-TZ95))

  • Much wider aperture: f/1.7 vs f/3.3
  • Supports an external flash
  • Much longer exposures: 1800 seconds vs 4 seconds

Significant disadvantages of the D-Lux 7 (vs the Lumix DC-ZS80 (Lumix DC-TZ95))

  • Much less zoom: 3.1x vs 30x
  • Screen does not flip out
  • No built-in flash

common strengths of the D-Lux 7 and Lumix DC-ZS80 (Lumix DC-TZ95)

  • Great zoom: 3.1x vs 30x
  • Fairly small: Standard size (118×66×64 mm) vs Mid size (112×69×42 mm)
  • Good image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs
    1. Lens

Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX100

Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX100
4 years older
$538 - $598

Significant advantages of the DMC-LX100 (vs the Lumix DC-ZS80 (Lumix DC-TZ95))

  • Much wider aperture: f/1.7 vs f/3.3
  • Significantly larger viewfinder: 0.67x vs 0.09x
  • Supports an external flash

Significant disadvantages of the DMC-LX100 (vs the Lumix DC-ZS80 (Lumix DC-TZ95))

  • Much less zoom: 3.1x vs 30x
  • No touch screen
  • Screen does not flip out

common strengths of the DMC-LX100 and Lumix DC-ZS80 (Lumix DC-TZ95)

  • Great zoom: 3.1x vs 30x
  • Fairly small: Mid size (115×66×55 mm) vs Mid size (112×69×42 mm)
  • Good image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs
    1. Lens

compared toSuper zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS80 (Lumix DC-TZ95) compared to super zoom competitors include: it has a slightly higher resolution screen (1,040k dots vs 460k dots), is significantly smaller (mid size (112×69×42 mm) vs large (132×92×117 mm)), has a touch screen, has a screen which flips out and has a CMOS-family sensor (CMOS vs CCD).

However, on average it has a slightly narrower aperture (f/3.3 vs f/2.8), lacks and external mic jack, doesn't support an external flash, has a slower max shutter speed (1/2000 of a second vs 1/4000 of a second) and slightly shorter exposures (4 seconds vs 60 seconds).

Nikon Coolpix B600

Placeholder
similar age
$327

Significant advantages of the Coolpix B600 (vs the Lumix DC-ZS80 (Lumix DC-TZ95))

  • Significantly faster max shutter speed: 1/4000 of a second vs 1/2000 of a second

Significant disadvantages of the Coolpix B600 (vs the Lumix DC-ZS80 (Lumix DC-TZ95))

  • No touch screen
  • Screen does not flip out
  • Significantly shorter battery life: 280 shots vs 380 shots

common strengths of the Coolpix B600 and Lumix DC-ZS80 (Lumix DC-TZ95)

  • Fairly small: Prosumer size (122×82×99 mm) vs Mid size (112×69×42 mm)
  • Light weight: 500 g vs 327 g
  • Thin: 3.9" vs 1.7"

Panasonic Lumix DC-FZ80 (Lumix DC-FZ82)

Panasonic Lumix DC-FZ80 (Lumix DC-FZ82)
2 years older

Significant advantages of the Lumix DC-FZ80 (Lumix DC-FZ82) (vs the Lumix DC-ZS80 (Lumix DC-TZ95))

  • Significantly better wide angle: 20 mm vs 24 mm
  • Wider aperture: f/2.8 vs f/3.3
  • Supports an external flash

Significant disadvantages of the Lumix DC-FZ80 (Lumix DC-FZ82) (vs the Lumix DC-ZS80 (Lumix DC-TZ95))

  • Significantly larger: Large (130×94×119 mm) vs Mid size (112×69×42 mm)
  • Screen does not flip out
  • Significantly thicker: 4.7" vs 1.7"

common strengths of the Lumix DC-FZ80 (Lumix DC-FZ82) and Lumix DC-ZS80 (Lumix DC-TZ95)

  • Have touch screens
  • Light weight: 616 g vs 327 g

Sony CyberShot DSC-H400

Sony CyberShot DSC-H400
5 years older
$244

Significant advantages of the DSC-H400 (vs the Lumix DC-ZS80 (Lumix DC-TZ95))

  • Has an external mic jack
  • Longer exposures: 30 seconds vs 4 seconds

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-H400 (vs the Lumix DC-ZS80 (Lumix DC-TZ95))

  • Much lower resolution screen: 460k dots vs 1,040k dots
  • Has a CCD-family sensor: CCD vs CMOS
  • Significantly larger: Large (130×95×122 mm) vs Mid size (112×69×42 mm)

common strengths of the DSC-H400 and Lumix DC-ZS80 (Lumix DC-TZ95)

  • Light weight: 628 g vs 327 g

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200
6 years older
$534

Significant advantages of the DMC-FZ200 (vs the Lumix DC-ZS80 (Lumix DC-TZ95))

  • Wider aperture: f/2.8 vs f/3.3
  • Much longer battery life: 540 shots vs 380 shots
  • Has an external mic jack

Significant disadvantages of the DMC-FZ200 (vs the Lumix DC-ZS80 (Lumix DC-TZ95))

  • Much lower resolution screen: 460k dots vs 1,040k dots
  • Larger: Professional size (125×87×110 mm) vs Mid size (112×69×42 mm)
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the DMC-FZ200 and Lumix DC-ZS80 (Lumix DC-TZ95)

  • Fairly small: Professional size (125×87×110 mm) vs Mid size (112×69×42 mm)
  • Great battery life: 540 shots vs 380 shots
  • Light weight: 588 g vs 327 g

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III
2 years older
$1,398

Significant advantages of the Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III (vs the Lumix DC-ZS80 (Lumix DC-TZ95))

  • Significantly wider aperture: f/2.4 vs f/3.3
  • Has an external mic jack
  • Better maximum light sensitivity: 25,600 ISO vs 6,400 ISO

Significant disadvantages of the Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III (vs the Lumix DC-ZS80 (Lumix DC-TZ95))

  • Significantly larger: Large (133×94×127 mm) vs Mid size (112×69×42 mm)
  • No touch screen
  • Much heavier: 1,051 g vs 327 g

common strengths of the Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III and Lumix DC-ZS80 (Lumix DC-TZ95)

  • Great battery life: 420 shots vs 380 shots

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ300

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ300
3 years older
$382 - $398

Significant advantages of the DMC-FZ300 (vs the Lumix DC-ZS80 (Lumix DC-TZ95))

  • Wider aperture: f/2.8 vs f/3.3
  • Has an external mic jack
  • Supports an external flash

Significant disadvantages of the DMC-FZ300 (vs the Lumix DC-ZS80 (Lumix DC-TZ95))

  • Significantly larger: Large (132×92×117 mm) vs Mid size (112×69×42 mm)
  • Significantly thicker: 4.6" vs 1.7"
  • Significantly heavier: 691 g vs 327 g

common strengths of the DMC-FZ300 and Lumix DC-ZS80 (Lumix DC-TZ95)

  • Fairly small: Large (132×92×117 mm) vs Mid size (112×69×42 mm)
  • Have touch screens
  • Great battery life: 380 shots vs 380 shots

compared toPro digicam competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS80 (Lumix DC-TZ95) compared to pro digicam competitors include: it has a much longer battery life (380 shots vs 235 shots), is newer (february 2019 vs october 2015), has higher quality type of viewfinder (digital vs none) and is more popular.

However, on average it has a much smaller sensor (1/2.3" 6.17x4.55mm vs nikon CX 13.2x8.8mm), has a much narrower aperture (f/3.3 vs f/1.4), takes much lower resolution photos (9.7 MP vs 20 MP), significantly lower maximum light sensitivity (6,400 ISO vs 25,600 ISO) and slightly smaller viewfinder (0.09x vs 0.22x).

Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX10 (Lumix DMC-LX15)

Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX10 (Lumix DMC-LX15)
2 years older

Significant advantages of the Lumix DMC-LX10 (Lumix DMC-LX15) (vs the Lumix DC-ZS80 (Lumix DC-TZ95))

  • Much wider aperture: f/1.4 vs f/3.3
  • Much larger sensor: Nikon CX 13.2x8.8mm vs 1/2.3" 6.17x4.55mm
  • Better maximum light sensitivity: 25,600 ISO vs 6,400 ISO

Significant disadvantages of the Lumix DMC-LX10 (Lumix DMC-LX15) (vs the Lumix DC-ZS80 (Lumix DC-TZ95))

  • Much shorter battery life: 260 shots vs 380 shots
  • Worse image stabilization:
    1. Sensor shift
    vs
    1. Lens
  • No viewfinder: None vs Digital

common strengths of the Lumix DMC-LX10 (Lumix DMC-LX15) and Lumix DC-ZS80 (Lumix DC-TZ95)

  • Each has a built-in flash
  • Have touch screens
  • Flip-out screens

Canon PowerShot G5 X

Canon PowerShot G5 X
3 years older
$588 - $699

Significant advantages of the PowerShot G5 X (vs the Lumix DC-ZS80 (Lumix DC-TZ95))

  • Much wider aperture: f/1.8 vs f/3.3
  • Much larger sensor: Nikon CX 13.2x8.8mm vs 1/2.3" 6.17x4.55mm
  • Has an external mic jack

Significant disadvantages of the PowerShot G5 X (vs the Lumix DC-ZS80 (Lumix DC-TZ95))

  • Much shorter battery life: 210 shots vs 380 shots

common strengths of the PowerShot G5 X and Lumix DC-ZS80 (Lumix DC-TZ95)

  • Each has a built-in flash
  • Have touch screens
  • Flip-out screens

Canon PowerShot G9 X Mark II

Canon PowerShot G9 X Mark II
2 years older
$369 - $429

Significant advantages of the PowerShot G9 X Mark II (vs the Lumix DC-ZS80 (Lumix DC-TZ95))

  • Much wider aperture: f/2 vs f/3.3
  • Much larger sensor: Nikon CX 13.2x8.8mm vs 1/2.3" 6.17x4.55mm
  • Much higher true resolution: 20 MP vs 9.7 MP

Significant disadvantages of the PowerShot G9 X Mark II (vs the Lumix DC-ZS80 (Lumix DC-TZ95))

  • Significantly worse wide angle: 28 mm vs 24 mm
  • Much shorter battery life: 235 shots vs 380 shots
  • Screen does not flip out

common strengths of the PowerShot G9 X Mark II and Lumix DC-ZS80 (Lumix DC-TZ95)

  • Each has a built-in flash
  • Have touch screens

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 III

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 III
4 years older
$510 - $748

Significant advantages of the DSC-RX100 III (vs the Lumix DC-ZS80 (Lumix DC-TZ95))

  • Much wider aperture: f/1.8 vs f/3.3
  • Much larger sensor: Nikon CX 13.2x8.8mm vs 1/2.3" 6.17x4.55mm
  • Much higher true resolution: 20 MP vs 9.7 MP

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-RX100 III (vs the Lumix DC-ZS80 (Lumix DC-TZ95))

  • No touch screen
  • Shorter battery life: 320 shots vs 380 shots

common strengths of the DSC-RX100 III and Lumix DC-ZS80 (Lumix DC-TZ95)

  • Each has a built-in flash
  • Flip-out screens
  • Great battery life: 320 shots vs 380 shots