As well as being compared against other digicams, the Panasonic Lumix DC-TS7 (Lumix DC-FT7) is also often compared to waterproofs, pro digicams, mirrorless, super zooms and compacts. The Panasonic Lumix DC-TS7 (Lumix DC-FT7)'s top rivals come from Olympus (such as the Tough TG-5 and the Stylus Tough TG-3) and Nikon (such as the Coolpix W300 and the Coolpix W100)

compared toDigicam competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Panasonic Lumix DC-TS7 (Lumix DC-FT7) compared to other digicam competitors include: it has a slightly higher resolution screen (1,040k dots vs 230k dots), has a screen which flips out, much larger viewfinder (0.43x vs 0.08x), is newer (may 2018 vs august 2016) and has higher quality type of viewfinder (digital vs none).

However, on average it has a significantly narrower wide angle lens (28 mm vs 24 mm), doesn't have a touch screen, doesn't shoot as fast continuously (10 fps vs 40 fps), has a slower max shutter speed (1/1300 of a second vs 1/3200 of a second) and slightly shorter exposures (4 seconds vs 60 seconds).

Canon PowerShot SX740 HS

Placeholder
similar age
$338 - $399

Significant advantages of the PowerShot SX740 HS (vs the Lumix DC-TS7 (Lumix DC-FT7))

  • Significantly better wide angle: 24 mm vs 28 mm
  • Much faster max shutter speed: 1/3200 of a second vs 1/1300 of a second

Significant disadvantages of the PowerShot SX740 HS (vs the Lumix DC-TS7 (Lumix DC-FT7))

  • No viewfinder: None vs Digital

common strengths of the PowerShot SX740 HS and Lumix DC-TS7 (Lumix DC-FT7)

  • Good image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs
    1. Lens
  • Flip-out screens

Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS200 (Lumix DC-TZ200)

Placeholder
similar age

Significant advantages of the Lumix DC-ZS200 (Lumix DC-TZ200) (vs the Lumix DC-TS7 (Lumix DC-FT7))

  • Significantly better wide angle: 24 mm vs 28 mm
  • Better maximum light sensitivity: 25,600 ISO vs 6,400 ISO
  • Much higher true resolution: 20 MP vs 9.7 MP

Significant disadvantages of the Lumix DC-ZS200 (Lumix DC-TZ200) (vs the Lumix DC-TS7 (Lumix DC-FT7))

  • Much smaller viewfinder: 0.19x vs 0.43x
  • Screen does not flip out

common strengths of the Lumix DC-ZS200 (Lumix DC-TZ200) and Lumix DC-TS7 (Lumix DC-FT7)

  • Good image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs
    1. Lens
  • Both have digital viewfinders: Digital vs Digital

Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS70 (Lumix DC-TZ90)

Placeholder
1 year older

Significant advantages of the Lumix DC-ZS70 (Lumix DC-TZ90) (vs the Lumix DC-TS7 (Lumix DC-FT7))

  • Significantly better wide angle: 24 mm vs 28 mm
  • Has a touch screen
  • Significantly longer battery life: 380 shots vs 300 shots

Significant disadvantages of the Lumix DC-ZS70 (Lumix DC-TZ90) (vs the Lumix DC-TS7 (Lumix DC-FT7))

  • Much smaller viewfinder: 0.08x vs 0.43x

common strengths of the Lumix DC-ZS70 (Lumix DC-TZ90) and Lumix DC-TS7 (Lumix DC-FT7)

  • Good image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs
    1. Lens
  • Flip-out screens
  • Both have digital viewfinders: Digital vs Digital

Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS60 (Lumix DMC-TZ80)

Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS60 (Lumix DMC-TZ80)
2 years older

Significant advantages of the Lumix DMC-ZS60 (Lumix DMC-TZ80) (vs the Lumix DC-TS7 (Lumix DC-FT7))

  • Shoots much faster: 40 fps vs 10 fps
  • Significantly better wide angle: 24 mm vs 28 mm
  • Has a touch screen

Significant disadvantages of the Lumix DMC-ZS60 (Lumix DMC-TZ80) (vs the Lumix DC-TS7 (Lumix DC-FT7))

  • Much smaller viewfinder: 0.08x vs 0.43x
  • Screen does not flip out

common strengths of the Lumix DMC-ZS60 (Lumix DMC-TZ80) and Lumix DC-TS7 (Lumix DC-FT7)

  • Good image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs
    1. Lens
  • Both have digital viewfinders: Digital vs Digital

Nikon Coolpix W100

Nikon Coolpix W100
1 year older
$99 - $157

Significant advantages of the Coolpix W100 (vs the Lumix DC-TS7 (Lumix DC-FT7))

  • Significantly faster max shutter speed: 1/2000 of a second vs 1/1300 of a second

Significant disadvantages of the Coolpix W100 (vs the Lumix DC-TS7 (Lumix DC-FT7))

  • Much lower resolution screen: 230k dots vs 1,040k dots
  • Worse image stabilization:
    1. Digital
    vs
    1. Lens
  • Screen does not flip out

common strengths of the Coolpix W100 and Lumix DC-TS7 (Lumix DC-FT7)

  • None found

Canon PowerShot SX720 HS

Canon PowerShot SX720 HS
2 years older
$315

Significant advantages of the PowerShot SX720 HS (vs the Lumix DC-TS7 (Lumix DC-FT7))

  • Significantly better wide angle: 24 mm vs 28 mm
  • Much faster max shutter speed: 1/3200 of a second vs 1/1300 of a second

Significant disadvantages of the PowerShot SX720 HS (vs the Lumix DC-TS7 (Lumix DC-FT7))

  • Screen does not flip out
  • No viewfinder: None vs Digital

common strengths of the PowerShot SX720 HS and Lumix DC-TS7 (Lumix DC-FT7)

  • Good image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs
    1. Lens

compared toWaterproof competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Panasonic Lumix DC-TS7 (Lumix DC-FT7) compared to waterproof competitors include: it has a built-in flash, has a much higher resolution screen (1,040k dots vs 460k dots), has better image stabilization (lens vs none), has a screen which flips out and has a CMOS-family sensor (CMOS vs CCD).

However, on average it has a much narrower wide angle lens (28 mm vs 5 mm), doesn't have a built-in GPS, is not waterproof, has a slower max shutter speed (1/1300 of a second vs 1/2000 of a second) and slightly shorter exposures (4 seconds vs 60 seconds).

Nikon Coolpix W300

Placeholder
1 year older
$339 - $387

Significant advantages of the Coolpix W300 (vs the Lumix DC-TS7 (Lumix DC-FT7))

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the Coolpix W300 (vs the Lumix DC-TS7 (Lumix DC-FT7))

  • None found

common strengths of the Coolpix W300 and Lumix DC-TS7 (Lumix DC-FT7)

  • None found

Panasonic Lumix DMC-TS30

Panasonic Lumix DMC-TS30
3 years older
$128 - $178

Significant advantages of the DMC-TS30 (vs the Lumix DC-TS7 (Lumix DC-FT7))

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the DMC-TS30 (vs the Lumix DC-TS7 (Lumix DC-FT7))

  • None found

common strengths of the DMC-TS30 and Lumix DC-TS7 (Lumix DC-FT7)

  • None found

Ricoh WG-5 GPS

Ricoh WG-5 GPS
3 years older

Significant advantages of the WG-5 GPS (vs the Lumix DC-TS7 (Lumix DC-FT7))

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the WG-5 GPS (vs the Lumix DC-TS7 (Lumix DC-FT7))

  • None found

common strengths of the WG-5 GPS and Lumix DC-TS7 (Lumix DC-FT7)

  • None found

Fujifilm XP80

Fujifilm XP80
3 years older
$140

Significant advantages of the XP80 (vs the Lumix DC-TS7 (Lumix DC-FT7))

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the XP80 (vs the Lumix DC-TS7 (Lumix DC-FT7))

  • None found

common strengths of the XP80 and Lumix DC-TS7 (Lumix DC-FT7)

  • None found

Panasonic Lumix DMC-TS6

Panasonic Lumix DMC-TS6
3 years older

Significant advantages of the DMC-TS6 (vs the Lumix DC-TS7 (Lumix DC-FT7))

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the DMC-TS6 (vs the Lumix DC-TS7 (Lumix DC-FT7))

  • None found

common strengths of the DMC-TS6 and Lumix DC-TS7 (Lumix DC-FT7)

  • None found

GoPro Hero 3+ Black Edition

GoPro Hero 3+ Black Edition
4 years older
$429

Significant advantages of the Black Edition (vs the Lumix DC-TS7 (Lumix DC-FT7))

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the Black Edition (vs the Lumix DC-TS7 (Lumix DC-FT7))

  • None found

common strengths of the Black Edition and Lumix DC-TS7 (Lumix DC-FT7)

  • None found

compared toPro digicam competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Panasonic Lumix DC-TS7 (Lumix DC-FT7) compared to pro digicam competitors include: it has a screen which flips out, has a slightly longer battery life (300 shots vs 235 shots), is newer (may 2018 vs january 2017) and has higher quality type of viewfinder (digital vs none).

However, on average it has a significantly smaller sensor (1/2.3" 6.17x4.55mm vs nikon CX 13.2x8.8mm), has a significantly narrower aperture (f/3.3 vs f/1.8), has a slightly narrower wide angle lens (28 mm vs 25 mm), is significantly larger (mid size (117×76×37 mm) vs compact (98×58×31 mm)) and takes significantly lower resolution photos (9.7 MP vs 20 MP).

Olympus Tough TG-5

Placeholder
1 year older
$399

Significant advantages of the Tough TG-5 (vs the Lumix DC-TS7 (Lumix DC-FT7))

  • Significantly wider aperture: f/2 vs f/3.3
  • Significantly better wide angle: 25 mm vs 28 mm
  • Significantly smaller: Compact (113×66×32 mm) vs Mid size (117×76×37 mm)

Significant disadvantages of the Tough TG-5 (vs the Lumix DC-TS7 (Lumix DC-FT7))

  • Significantly lower resolution screen: 460k dots vs 1,040k dots
  • Screen does not flip out
  • Worse image stabilization:
    1. Sensor shift
    vs
    1. Lens

common strengths of the Tough TG-5 and Lumix DC-TS7 (Lumix DC-FT7)

  • Great battery life: 340 shots vs 300 shots

Canon PowerShot G9 X Mark II

Canon PowerShot G9 X Mark II
1 year older
$369 - $429

Significant advantages of the PowerShot G9 X Mark II (vs the Lumix DC-TS7 (Lumix DC-FT7))

  • Much larger sensor: Nikon CX 13.2x8.8mm vs 1/2.3" 6.17x4.55mm
  • Significantly wider aperture: f/2 vs f/3.3
  • Much smaller: Compact (98×58×31 mm) vs Mid size (117×76×37 mm)

Significant disadvantages of the PowerShot G9 X Mark II (vs the Lumix DC-TS7 (Lumix DC-FT7))

  • Screen does not flip out
  • Significantly shorter battery life: 235 shots vs 300 shots
  • No viewfinder: None vs Digital

common strengths of the PowerShot G9 X Mark II and Lumix DC-TS7 (Lumix DC-FT7)

  • None found

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V
1 year older
$998 - $1,010

Significant advantages of the Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V (vs the Lumix DC-TS7 (Lumix DC-FT7))

  • Much larger sensor: Nikon CX 13.2x8.8mm vs 1/2.3" 6.17x4.55mm
  • Significantly wider aperture: f/1.8 vs f/3.3
  • Significantly better wide angle: 24 mm vs 28 mm

Significant disadvantages of the Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V (vs the Lumix DC-TS7 (Lumix DC-FT7))

  • Much shorter battery life: 220 shots vs 300 shots

common strengths of the Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V and Lumix DC-TS7 (Lumix DC-FT7)

  • Flip-out screens
  • Both have digital viewfinders: Digital vs Digital

compared toMirrorless interchangeable-lens competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Panasonic Lumix DC-TS7 (Lumix DC-FT7) compared to mirrorless interchangeable-lens competitors include: it has higher quality type of viewfinder (digital vs none), has better image stabilization (lens vs none), has a screen which flips out and is newer (may 2018 vs september 2013).

However, on average it significantly smaller viewfinder (0.43x vs 0.67x), takes significantly lower resolution photos (9.7 MP vs 24 MP), doesn't have a touch screen, has a marginally smaller sensor (1/2.3" 6.17x4.55mm vs APS-C 22.3x14.9mm) and users slower contrast detection autofocus (contrast detection vs phase detection).

Canon EOS M100

Placeholder
8 months older
$379 (body only)
$449 15-45mm lens

Significant advantages of the EOS M100 (vs the Lumix DC-TS7 (Lumix DC-FT7))

  • Has a touch screen
  • Much higher true resolution: 24 MP vs 9.7 MP
  • Has interchangeable lenses

Significant disadvantages of the EOS M100 (vs the Lumix DC-TS7 (Lumix DC-FT7))

  • No viewfinder: None vs Digital

common strengths of the EOS M100 and Lumix DC-TS7 (Lumix DC-FT7)

  • Fairly small: Mid size (108×67×35 mm) vs Mid size (117×76×37 mm)
  • Thin: 1.4" vs 1.5"
  • Light weight: 302 g vs 319 g

Panasonic Lumix DMC-GX80

Panasonic Lumix DMC-GX80
2 years older
$493 (body only)
$616 14-42mm lens

Significant advantages of the DMC-GX80 (vs the Lumix DC-TS7 (Lumix DC-FT7))

  • Has a touch screen
  • Much larger viewfinder: 0.67x vs 0.43x
  • Has interchangeable lenses

Significant disadvantages of the DMC-GX80 (vs the Lumix DC-TS7 (Lumix DC-FT7))

  • Worse image stabilization:
    1. Sensor shift
    vs
    1. Lens

common strengths of the DMC-GX80 and Lumix DC-TS7 (Lumix DC-FT7)

  • Fairly small: Mid size (122×71×44 mm) vs Mid size (117×76×37 mm)
  • Thin: 1.7" vs 1.5"
  • Light weight: 426 g vs 319 g

Panasonic Lumix DMC-GX7 Mark II

Panasonic Lumix DMC-GX7 Mark II
2 years older

Significant advantages of the DMC-GX7 Mark II (vs the Lumix DC-TS7 (Lumix DC-FT7))

  • Has a touch screen
  • Much larger viewfinder: 0.67x vs 0.43x
  • Has interchangeable lenses

Significant disadvantages of the DMC-GX7 Mark II (vs the Lumix DC-TS7 (Lumix DC-FT7))

  • Worse image stabilization:
    1. Sensor shift
    vs
    1. Lens

common strengths of the DMC-GX7 Mark II and Lumix DC-TS7 (Lumix DC-FT7)

  • Fairly small: Mid size (122×71×44 mm) vs Mid size (117×76×37 mm)
  • Thin: 1.7" vs 1.5"
  • Light weight: 426 g vs 319 g

Sony Alpha a6300

Sony Alpha a6300
2 years older

Significant advantages of the Alpha a6300 (vs the Lumix DC-TS7 (Lumix DC-FT7))

  • Much higher true resolution: 24 MP vs 9.7 MP
  • Has interchangeable lenses
  • Faster autofocus: Phase detection vs Contrast detection

Significant disadvantages of the Alpha a6300 (vs the Lumix DC-TS7 (Lumix DC-FT7))

  • None found

common strengths of the Alpha a6300 and Lumix DC-TS7 (Lumix DC-FT7)

  • Fairly small: Mid size (120×67×49 mm) vs Mid size (117×76×37 mm)
  • Thin: 1.9" vs 1.5"
  • Light weight: 404 g vs 319 g

Nikon 1 AW1

Nikon 1 AW1
4 years older
$360 11-2mm lens

Significant advantages of the AW1 (vs the Lumix DC-TS7 (Lumix DC-FT7))

  • Has interchangeable lenses
  • Has a GPS
  • Waterproof

Significant disadvantages of the AW1 (vs the Lumix DC-TS7 (Lumix DC-FT7))

  • No image stabilization: None vs
    1. Lens
  • No viewfinder: None vs Digital
  • Screen does not flip out

common strengths of the AW1 and Lumix DC-TS7 (Lumix DC-FT7)

  • Fairly small: Mid size (114×72×37 mm) vs Mid size (117×76×37 mm)
  • Light weight: 201 g vs 319 g
  • Thin: 1.5" vs 1.5"

compared toSuper zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Panasonic Lumix DC-TS7 (Lumix DC-FT7) compared to super zoom competitors include: it has a slightly higher resolution screen (1,040k dots vs 461k dots), is significantly smaller (mid size (117×76×37 mm) vs large (132×92×117 mm)), has a screen which flips out, much larger viewfinder (0.43x vs 0.08x) and is newer (may 2018 vs january 2016).

However, on average it has a slightly narrower aperture (f/3.3 vs f/2.8), has slightly less zoom (4.6x vs 50x), has a much narrower wide angle lens (28 mm vs 20 mm), doesn't have a touch screen and lacks and external mic jack.

Panasonic Lumix DC-FZ80 (Lumix DC-FZ82)

Panasonic Lumix DC-FZ80 (Lumix DC-FZ82)
1 year older

Significant advantages of the Lumix DC-FZ80 (Lumix DC-FZ82) (vs the Lumix DC-TS7 (Lumix DC-FT7))

  • Much better wide angle: 20 mm vs 28 mm
  • Wider aperture: f/2.8 vs f/3.3
  • Has a touch screen

Significant disadvantages of the Lumix DC-FZ80 (Lumix DC-FZ82) (vs the Lumix DC-TS7 (Lumix DC-FT7))

  • Significantly larger: Large (130×94×119 mm) vs Mid size (117×76×37 mm)
  • Screen does not flip out
  • Much thicker: 4.7" vs 1.5"

common strengths of the Lumix DC-FZ80 (Lumix DC-FZ82) and Lumix DC-TS7 (Lumix DC-FT7)

  • Light weight: 616 g vs 319 g

Canon PowerShot SX540 HS

Canon PowerShot SX540 HS
2 years older
$399 - $426

Significant advantages of the PowerShot SX540 HS (vs the Lumix DC-TS7 (Lumix DC-FT7))

  • Significantly better wide angle: 24 mm vs 28 mm
  • Significantly faster max shutter speed: 1/2000 of a second vs 1/1300 of a second

Significant disadvantages of the PowerShot SX540 HS (vs the Lumix DC-TS7 (Lumix DC-FT7))

  • Much lower resolution screen: 461k dots vs 1,040k dots
  • Screen does not flip out
  • Significantly shorter battery life: 205 shots vs 300 shots

common strengths of the PowerShot SX540 HS and Lumix DC-TS7 (Lumix DC-FT7)

  • Fairly small: Prosumer size (120×82×92 mm) vs Mid size (117×76×37 mm)
  • Very light: 442 g vs 319 g
  • Thin: 3.6" vs 1.5"

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ300

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ300
2 years older
$382 - $398

Significant advantages of the DMC-FZ300 (vs the Lumix DC-TS7 (Lumix DC-FT7))

  • Wider aperture: f/2.8 vs f/3.3
  • Significantly better wide angle: 25 mm vs 28 mm
  • Has an external mic jack

Significant disadvantages of the DMC-FZ300 (vs the Lumix DC-TS7 (Lumix DC-FT7))

  • Significantly larger: Large (132×92×117 mm) vs Mid size (117×76×37 mm)
  • Significantly thicker: 4.6" vs 1.5"
  • Significantly heavier: 691 g vs 319 g

common strengths of the DMC-FZ300 and Lumix DC-TS7 (Lumix DC-FT7)

  • Fairly small: Large (132×92×117 mm) vs Mid size (117×76×37 mm)
  • Light weight: 691 g vs 319 g

compared toCompact competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Panasonic Lumix DC-TS7 (Lumix DC-FT7) compared to compact competitors include: it has a built-in flash, has a slightly larger screen (3" vs 2"), has a significantly higher resolution screen (1,040k dots vs 230k dots), has better image stabilization (lens vs digital) and has a screen which flips out.

However, on average it is much larger (mid size (117×76×37 mm) vs compact (94×59×27 mm)), doesn't have a touch screen, is thicker (1.5" vs 1.1"), is much heavier (319 g vs 145 g) and has a slower max shutter speed (1/1300 of a second vs 1/4000 of a second).

Fujifilm FinePix XP130

Placeholder
3 months older
$130 - $162

Significant advantages of the FinePix XP130 (vs the Lumix DC-TS7 (Lumix DC-FT7))

  • Significantly smaller: Compact (110×71×28 mm) vs Mid size (117×76×37 mm)
  • Much lighter: 207 g vs 319 g
  • Significantly thinner: 1.1" vs 1.5"

Significant disadvantages of the FinePix XP130 (vs the Lumix DC-TS7 (Lumix DC-FT7))

  • Screen does not flip out
  • Worse image stabilization:
    1. Sensor shift
    vs
    1. Lens
  • Significantly shorter battery life: 240 shots vs 300 shots

common strengths of the FinePix XP130 and Lumix DC-TS7 (Lumix DC-FT7)

  • Each has a built-in flash
  • Larger than average screens: 3" vs 3"

GoPro Hero (2018)

Placeholder
similar age
$259

Significant advantages of the Hero (2018) (vs the Lumix DC-TS7 (Lumix DC-FT7))

  • Much smaller: Super compact (65×45×35 mm) vs Mid size (117×76×37 mm)
  • Has a touch screen
  • Much lighter: 117 g vs 319 g

Significant disadvantages of the Hero (2018) (vs the Lumix DC-TS7 (Lumix DC-FT7))

  • No built-in flash
  • Much smaller screen: 2" vs 3"
  • Worse image stabilization:
    1. Digital
    vs
    1. Lens

common strengths of the Hero (2018) and Lumix DC-TS7 (Lumix DC-FT7)

  • None found

Ricoh WG-50

Placeholder
1 year older
$233

Significant advantages of the WG-50 (vs the Lumix DC-TS7 (Lumix DC-FT7))

  • Significantly smaller: Compact (123×62×30 mm) vs Mid size (117×76×37 mm)
  • Much lighter: 193 g vs 319 g
  • Significantly thinner: 1.2" vs 1.5"

Significant disadvantages of the WG-50 (vs the Lumix DC-TS7 (Lumix DC-FT7))

  • Much lower resolution screen: 230k dots vs 1,040k dots
  • Worse image stabilization:
    1. Digital
    vs
    1. Lens
  • Screen does not flip out

common strengths of the WG-50 and Lumix DC-TS7 (Lumix DC-FT7)

  • Each has a built-in flash
  • Great battery life: 300 shots vs 300 shots

Canon ELPH 320 HS

Canon PowerShot ELPH 320 HS
6 years older
$299

Significant advantages of the 320 HS (vs the Lumix DC-TS7 (Lumix DC-FT7))

  • Much smaller: Super compact (94×57×21 mm) vs Mid size (117×76×37 mm)
  • Significantly better wide angle: 24 mm vs 28 mm
  • Has a touch screen

Significant disadvantages of the 320 HS (vs the Lumix DC-TS7 (Lumix DC-FT7))

  • Significantly lower resolution screen: 461k dots vs 1,040k dots
  • Much shorter battery life: 170 shots vs 300 shots
  • Screen does not flip out

common strengths of the 320 HS and Lumix DC-TS7 (Lumix DC-FT7)

  • Each has a built-in flash
  • Larger than average screens: 3.2" vs 3"
  • Good image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs
    1. Lens

GoPro Hero6 Black

Placeholder
7 months older
$498

Significant advantages of the Hero6 Black (vs the Lumix DC-TS7 (Lumix DC-FT7))

  • Much smaller: Super compact (65×45×35 mm) vs Mid size (117×76×37 mm)
  • Has an external mic jack
  • Shoots much faster: 30 fps vs 10 fps

Significant disadvantages of the Hero6 Black (vs the Lumix DC-TS7 (Lumix DC-FT7))

  • No built-in flash
  • Much smaller screen: 2" vs 3"
  • Worse image stabilization:
    1. Digital
    vs
    1. Lens

common strengths of the Hero6 Black and Lumix DC-TS7 (Lumix DC-FT7)

  • None found

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W300

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W300
10 years older

Significant advantages of the DSC-W300 (vs the Lumix DC-TS7 (Lumix DC-FT7))

  • Much smaller: Compact (94×59×27 mm) vs Mid size (117×76×37 mm)
  • Much lighter: 187 g vs 319 g
  • Much thinner: 1.1" vs 1.5"

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-W300 (vs the Lumix DC-TS7 (Lumix DC-FT7))

  • Much worse wide angle: 35 mm vs 28 mm
  • Has a CCD-family sensor: CCD vs CMOS
  • Much lower resolution screen: 230k dots vs 1,040k dots

common strengths of the DSC-W300 and Lumix DC-TS7 (Lumix DC-FT7)

  • Each has a built-in flash
  • Good image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs
    1. Lens
  • Great battery life: 300 shots vs 300 shots