Olympus mju 730 Digital

3x, f/3.5, 38 mm
Retailer
    Style
      Color
        You save

        Summary Olympus 730 Digital

        Prices Price
        Camera only
        Unknown
        Score Snapsort rank
        Among similar cameras
        #n/a of 4
        Specifications Key specs
        Zoom
        Help 3x
        Screen size
        Help 3"
        Aperture
        Help f/3.5
        Screen resolution
        Help 230k dots
        Wide angle
        Help 38 mm
        Movie format
        Help 480p @ 30fps
        see all specifications

        Also known as: Olympus Stylus 730

        Olympus mju 730 DigitalOlympus mju 730 Digital

        Pros

        Report a correction

        The Olympus 730 Digital vs other recent compacts

        Screen size Above average sized screen Help
        3"
        Thickness Thin Help
        0.8"
        Size Quite small Help
        Super compact (96×62×21 mm)

        Cons

        Report a correction

        The Olympus 730 Digital vs other recent compacts

        Zoom Below average zoom Help
        3x
        Wide angle Very poor wide angle lens Help
        38 mm
        Image stabilization No image stabilization Help
        Risk of blur
        True resolution Lower true resolution Help
        7.1 MP
        Sensor type Sensor type Help
        CCD
        Longest exposure Short exposures Help
        4 seconds
        Movie format Low resolution movies Help
        480p @ 30fps
        Screen resolution Low resolution screen Help
        230k dots
        Light sensitivity Poor maximum light sensitivity Help
        800 ISO
        Screen flips out Fixed screen Help
        Less flexible
        Announced Old Help
        August 2006
        Popularity Not so popular Help
        Among snapsort users

        Appearance

        front photo of the Olympus mju 730 Digitalback photo of the Olympus mju 730 Digitalangle photo of the Olympus mju 730 Digital

        Discussion

        Olympus mju 730 Digital
        mju 730 Digital
        Olympus

        Report a correction

        Showing 0 comments