As well as being compared against other compacts, the Olympus mju 410 Digital is also often compared to travel zooms. The Olympus mju 410 Digital's top rivals come from Canon (such as the PowerShot S110 and the Digital IXUS 430) and Olympus (such as the VH-520)

Competitor classes

compared toCompact competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Olympus mju 410 Digital compared to other compact competitors include: it has higher quality type of viewfinder (tunnel vs none).

However, on average it has a slightly narrower aperture (f/3.1 vs f/2), has a much narrower wide angle lens (35 mm vs 24 mm), has a significantly smaller screen (1.5" vs 3"), is slightly larger (compact (99×56×34 mm) vs compact (87×57×28 mm)) and doesn't have image stabilization (none vs lens).

Canon PowerShot S110

Canon PowerShot S110
8 years newer
$439

Significant advantages of the S110 (vs the mju 410 Digital)

  • Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 35 mm
  • Image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs None
  • Much larger screen: 3" vs 1.5"

Significant disadvantages of the S110 (vs the mju 410 Digital)

  • No viewfinder: None vs Tunnel

common strengths of the S110 and mju 410 Digital

  • Each has a built-in flash

Canon Digital IXUS 430

Placeholder
similar age

Significant advantages of the Digital IXUS 430 (vs the mju 410 Digital)

  • Significantly thinner: 1.1" vs 1.3"
  • Much faster max shutter speed: 1/2000 of a second vs 1/1000 of a second

Significant disadvantages of the Digital IXUS 430 (vs the mju 410 Digital)

  • None found

common strengths of the Digital IXUS 430 and mju 410 Digital

  • Each has a built-in flash
  • Both have tunnel viewfinders: Tunnel vs Tunnel

compared toTravel zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Olympus mju 410 Digital compared to travel zoom competitors include: it has a viewfinder (tunnel vs none).

However, on average it has a much narrower wide angle lens (35 mm vs 26 mm), has a much smaller screen (1.5" vs 3"), has a slightly lower resolution screen (134k dots vs 460k dots), is slightly larger (compact (99×56×34 mm) vs super compact (101×60×21 mm)) and doesn't have image stabilization (none vs sensor shift).

Olympus VH-520

Olympus VH-520
9 years newer

Significant advantages of the VH-520 (vs the mju 410 Digital)

  • Much better wide angle: 26 mm vs 35 mm
  • Much larger screen: 3" vs 1.5"
  • Image stabilization:
    1. Sensor shift
    vs None

Significant disadvantages of the VH-520 (vs the mju 410 Digital)

  • No viewfinder: None vs Tunnel

common strengths of the VH-520 and mju 410 Digital

  • Very small: Super compact (101×60×21 mm) vs Compact (99×56×34 mm)
  • Very thin: 0.8" vs 1.3"
  • Very light: 138 g vs 200 g