As well as being compared against other compacts, the Olympus Stylus 750 is also often compared to entry-level DSLRs and travel zooms. The Olympus Stylus 750's top rivals come from Canon (such as the EOS Rebel T6i) and Olympus (such as the Stylus 770 SW and the VR-370)

compared toCompact competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Olympus Stylus 750 compared to other compact competitors include: it has significantly more zoom (5x vs 3x), has better image stabilization (sensor shift vs none) and is significantly less expensive ($69.99 vs $379.95).

However, on average it records lower quality movies (480p @ 15fps vs 720p @ 30fps), has a significantly narrower wide angle lens (36 mm vs 28 mm), has a CCD-family sensor (CCD vs CMOS), is older (august 2006 vs january 2012) and is not waterproof.

Olympus Stylus 770 SW

Olympus Stylus 770 SW
5 months newer

Significant advantages of the 770 SW (vs the Stylus 750)

  • Waterproof

Significant disadvantages of the 770 SW (vs the Stylus 750)

  • Much less zoom: 3x vs 5x
  • Worse wide angle: 38 mm vs 36 mm

common strengths of the 770 SW and Stylus 750

  • Each has a built-in flash
  • Fairly small: Super compact (92×59×21 mm) vs Super compact (96×54×24 mm)
  • Very thin: 0.8" vs 0.9"

Olympus TG-820

Olympus TG-820 iHS
5 years newer
$380

Significant advantages of the TG-820 (vs the Stylus 750)

  • Much better wide angle: 28 mm vs 36 mm
  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs 480p @ 15fps
  • Has a CMOS-family sensor: CMOS vs CCD

Significant disadvantages of the TG-820 (vs the Stylus 750)

  • None found

common strengths of the TG-820 and Stylus 750

  • Each has a built-in flash
  • Great zoom: 5x vs 5x
  • Fairly small: Compact (96×63×23 mm) vs Super compact (96×54×24 mm)

Olympus Stylus 760

Olympus Stylus 760
5 months newer
$499

Significant advantages of the Stylus 760 (vs the Stylus 750)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the Stylus 760 (vs the Stylus 750)

  • Much less zoom: 3x vs 5x

common strengths of the Stylus 760 and Stylus 750

  • Each has a built-in flash
  • Fairly small: Compact (99×54×24 mm) vs Super compact (96×54×24 mm)
  • Very thin: 0.9" vs 0.9"

Olympus VG-160

Olympus VG-160
5 years newer

Significant advantages of the VG-160 (vs the Stylus 750)

  • Much better wide angle: 26 mm vs 36 mm
  • Higher resolution movies: 720p @ 30fps vs 480p @ 15fps
  • Thinner: 0.7" vs 0.9"

Significant disadvantages of the VG-160 (vs the Stylus 750)

  • Worse image stabilization:
    1. Digital
    vs
    1. Sensor shift

common strengths of the VG-160 and Stylus 750

  • Each has a built-in flash
  • Great zoom: 5x vs 5x
  • Fairly small: Super compact (96×57×19 mm) vs Super compact (96×54×24 mm)

Olympus Stylus 740

Olympus Stylus 740
similar age
$70

Significant advantages of the Stylus 740 (vs the Stylus 750)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the Stylus 740 (vs the Stylus 750)

  • No image stabilization: None vs
    1. Sensor shift

common strengths of the Stylus 740 and Stylus 750

  • Each has a built-in flash
  • Great zoom: 5x vs 5x
  • Fairly small: Super compact (96×54×24 mm) vs Super compact (96×54×24 mm)

Olympus Stylus 720 SW

Olympus Stylus 720 SW
7 months older
$437

Significant advantages of the 720 SW (vs the Stylus 750)

  • Waterproof

Significant disadvantages of the 720 SW (vs the Stylus 750)

  • No image stabilization: None vs
    1. Sensor shift
  • Much less zoom: 3x vs 5x
  • Much slower max shutter speed: 1/1000 of a second vs 1/2000 of a second

common strengths of the 720 SW and Stylus 750

  • Each has a built-in flash
  • Fairly small: Super compact (95×56×20 mm) vs Super compact (96×54×24 mm)
  • Very thin: 0.8" vs 0.9"

compared toEntry-level DSLR competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Olympus Stylus 750 compared to entry-level DSLR competitors include: it is much smaller (super compact (96×54×24 mm) vs professional size (132×101×78 mm)), is much less expensive ($69.99 vs $649.00), is thinner (0.9" vs 3.1") and is much lighter (170 g vs 555 g).

However, on average it records lower quality movies (480p @ 15fps vs 1080p @ 30fps), has a much smaller screen (2.5" vs 3"), has a much lower resolution screen (215k dots vs 1,040k dots), takes much lower resolution photos (7.1 MP vs 24 MP) and doesn't have a touch screen.

Canon EOS Rebel T6i

Canon EOS Rebel T6i
8 years newer
$649 18-55mm lens

Significant advantages of the T6i (vs the Stylus 750)

  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs 480p @ 15fps
  • Much higher resolution screen: 1,040k dots vs 215k dots
  • Has a viewfinder: Pentamirror vs None

Significant disadvantages of the T6i (vs the Stylus 750)

  • Much larger: Professional size (132×101×78 mm) vs Super compact (96×54×24 mm)
  • Much thicker: 3.1" vs 0.9"
  • Much heavier: 555 g vs 170 g

common strengths of the T6i and Stylus 750

  • None found

compared toTravel zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Olympus Stylus 750 compared to travel zoom competitors include: it is slightly smaller (super compact (96×54×24 mm) vs compact (104×60×28 mm)) and is thinner (0.9" vs 1.1").

However, on average it has way more less zoom (5x vs 12.5x), has a much narrower wide angle lens (36 mm vs 24 mm), records lower quality movies (480p @ 15fps vs 720p), has a slightly smaller screen (2.5" vs 3") and has a slightly lower resolution screen (215k dots vs 460k dots).

Olympus VR-370

Olympus VR-370
6 years newer

Significant advantages of the VR-370 (vs the Stylus 750)

  • Much more zoom: 12.5x vs 5x
  • Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 36 mm
  • Higher resolution movies: 720p vs 480p @ 15fps

Significant disadvantages of the VR-370 (vs the Stylus 750)

  • None found

common strengths of the VR-370 and Stylus 750

  • Very small: Compact (104×60×28 mm) vs Super compact (96×54×24 mm)
  • Very thin: 1.1" vs 0.9"
  • Very light: 172 g vs 170 g