As well as being compared against other compacts, the Olympus Stylus 750 is also often compared to travel zooms and mirrorless. The Olympus Stylus 750's top rivals come from Olympus (such as the VR-370 and the TG-820) and Canon (such as the PowerShot SD500)

compared toCompact competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Olympus Stylus 750 compared to other compact competitors include: it has better image stabilization (sensor shift vs none) and has a faster max shutter speed (1/2000 of a second vs 1/1000 of a second).

However, on average it records lower quality movies (480p @ 15fps vs 1080p @ 30fps), has a CCD-family sensor (CCD vs CMOS), is older (august 2006 vs february 2012), doesn't have a viewfinder (none vs tunnel) and is not waterproof.

Canon PowerShot SD500

Placeholder
1 year older

Significant advantages of the SD500 (vs the Stylus 750)

  • Has a viewfinder: Tunnel vs None

Significant disadvantages of the SD500 (vs the Stylus 750)

  • No image stabilization: None vs
    1. Sensor shift
  • Much smaller screen: 2" vs 2.5"

common strengths of the SD500 and Stylus 750

  • Fairly small: Compact (90×57×27 mm) vs Super compact (96×54×24 mm)

Olympus TG-820

Olympus TG-820 iHS
5 years newer
$180

Significant advantages of the TG-820 (vs the Stylus 750)

  • Much better wide angle: 28 mm vs 36 mm
  • Much larger screen: 3" vs 2.5"
  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs 480p @ 15fps

Significant disadvantages of the TG-820 (vs the Stylus 750)

  • None found

common strengths of the TG-820 and Stylus 750

  • Fairly small: Compact (96×63×23 mm) vs Super compact (96×54×24 mm)
  • Thin: 0.9" vs 0.9"

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T20

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T20
6 months newer
$200

Significant advantages of the DSC-T20 (vs the Stylus 750)

  • Better image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs
    1. Sensor shift

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-T20 (vs the Stylus 750)

  • Worse wide angle: 38 mm vs 36 mm
  • Much slower max shutter speed: 1/1000 of a second vs 1/2000 of a second

common strengths of the DSC-T20 and Stylus 750

  • Fairly small: Super compact (90×56×23 mm) vs Super compact (96×54×24 mm)
  • Thin: 0.9" vs 0.9"

Olympus Stylus 850 SW

Olympus Stylus 850 SW
1 year newer
$600

Significant advantages of the 850 SW (vs the Stylus 750)

  • Waterproof

Significant disadvantages of the 850 SW (vs the Stylus 750)

  • No image stabilization: None vs
    1. Sensor shift
  • Worse wide angle: 38 mm vs 36 mm
  • Much slower max shutter speed: 1/1000 of a second vs 1/2000 of a second

common strengths of the 850 SW and Stylus 750

  • Fairly small: Super compact (94×61×21 mm) vs Super compact (96×54×24 mm)
  • Thin: 0.8" vs 0.9"

compared toTravel zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Olympus Stylus 750 compared to travel zoom competitors include: it is slightly smaller (super compact (96×54×24 mm) vs compact (104×60×28 mm)) and is thinner (0.9" vs 1.1").

However, on average it has a much narrower wide angle lens (36 mm vs 24 mm), records lower quality movies (480p @ 15fps vs 720p), has a much smaller screen (2.5" vs 3"), has a slightly lower resolution screen (215k dots vs 460k dots) and is older (august 2006 vs january 2013).

Olympus VR-370

Olympus VR-370
6 years newer
$287

Significant advantages of the VR-370 (vs the Stylus 750)

  • Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 36 mm
  • Much larger screen: 3" vs 2.5"
  • Higher resolution movies: 720p vs 480p @ 15fps

Significant disadvantages of the VR-370 (vs the Stylus 750)

  • Larger: Compact (104×60×28 mm) vs Super compact (96×54×24 mm)

common strengths of the VR-370 and Stylus 750

  • Fairly small: Compact (104×60×28 mm) vs Super compact (96×54×24 mm)
  • Thin: 1.1" vs 0.9"
  • Light weight: 172 g vs 170 g

compared toMirrorless interchangeable-lens competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Olympus Stylus 750 compared to mirrorless interchangeable-lens competitors include: it has image stabilization (sensor shift vs none), is significantly smaller (super compact (96×54×24 mm) vs standard size (127×94×48 mm)), is thinner (0.9" vs 1.9"), is much lighter (170 g vs 465 g) and has a built-in flash.

However, on average it records lower quality movies (480p @ 15fps vs 1080p @ 60fps), has a much smaller screen (2.5" vs 3"), has a much lower resolution screen (215k dots vs 921k dots), doesn't have a viewfinder (none vs digital) and takes much lower resolution photos (7.1 MP vs 36.2 MP).

Sony A7R

Sony A7R
7 years newer
$1,898 - $2,399 (body only)
$2,299 28-70mm lens

Significant advantages of the A7R (vs the Stylus 750)

  • Much larger screen: 3" vs 2.5"
  • Much higher true resolution: 36.2 MP vs 7.1 MP
  • Much higher resolution screen: 921k dots vs 215k dots

Significant disadvantages of the A7R (vs the Stylus 750)

  • No image stabilization: None vs
    1. Sensor shift
  • Significantly larger: Standard size (127×94×48 mm) vs Super compact (96×54×24 mm)
  • Much heavier: 465 g vs 170 g

common strengths of the A7R and Stylus 750

  • None found