As well as being compared against other compacts, the Olympus Stylus 750 is also often compared to mirrorless and travel zooms. The Olympus Stylus 750's top rivals come from Olympus (such as the TG-820 and the VR-370) and Sony (such as the A7R)

compared toCompact competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Olympus Stylus 750 compared to other compact competitors include: it has better image stabilization (sensor shift vs none) and has a faster max shutter speed (1/2000 of a second vs 1/1000 of a second).

However, on average it records lower quality movies (480p @ 15fps vs 1080p @ 30fps), is older (august 2006 vs february 2012), doesn't have a viewfinder (none vs tunnel) and is not waterproof.

Olympus TG-820

Olympus TG-820 iHS
5 years newer
$230

Significant advantages of the TG-820 (vs the Stylus 750)

  • Much better wide angle: 28 mm vs 36 mm
  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs 480p @ 15fps
  • Much larger screen: 3" vs 2.5"

Significant disadvantages of the TG-820 (vs the Stylus 750)

  • None found

common strengths of the TG-820 and Stylus 750

  • Fairly small: Compact (96×63×23 mm) vs Super compact (96×54×24 mm)
  • Thin: 0.9" vs 0.9"

Canon PowerShot SD500

Placeholder
1 year older

Significant advantages of the SD500 (vs the Stylus 750)

  • Has a viewfinder: Tunnel vs None
  • Longer exposures: 15 seconds vs 4 seconds

Significant disadvantages of the SD500 (vs the Stylus 750)

  • No image stabilization: None vs
    1. Sensor shift
  • Much smaller screen: 2" vs 2.5"

common strengths of the SD500 and Stylus 750

  • Fairly small: Compact (90×57×27 mm) vs Super compact (96×54×24 mm)

Olympus Stylus 740

Olympus Stylus 740
similar age

Significant advantages of the Stylus 740 (vs the Stylus 750)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the Stylus 740 (vs the Stylus 750)

  • No image stabilization: None vs
    1. Sensor shift

common strengths of the Stylus 740 and Stylus 750

  • Fairly small: Super compact (96×54×24 mm) vs Super compact (96×54×24 mm)
  • Thin: 0.9" vs 0.9"

Olympus Stylus 725 SW

Olympus Stylus 725 SW
similar age
$372

Significant advantages of the 725 SW (vs the Stylus 750)

  • Waterproof

Significant disadvantages of the 725 SW (vs the Stylus 750)

  • No image stabilization: None vs
    1. Sensor shift
  • Much slower max shutter speed: 1/1000 of a second vs 1/2000 of a second

common strengths of the 725 SW and Stylus 750

  • Fairly small: Super compact (91×58×20 mm) vs Super compact (96×54×24 mm)
  • Thin: 0.8" vs 0.9"

Olympus Stylus 720 SW

Olympus Stylus 720 SW
7 months older
$356

Significant advantages of the 720 SW (vs the Stylus 750)

  • Waterproof

Significant disadvantages of the 720 SW (vs the Stylus 750)

  • No image stabilization: None vs
    1. Sensor shift
  • Much slower max shutter speed: 1/1000 of a second vs 1/2000 of a second

common strengths of the 720 SW and Stylus 750

  • Fairly small: Super compact (95×56×20 mm) vs Super compact (96×54×24 mm)
  • Thin: 0.8" vs 0.9"

compared toMirrorless interchangeable-lens competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Olympus Stylus 750 compared to mirrorless interchangeable-lens competitors include: it has image stabilization (sensor shift vs none), is significantly smaller (super compact (96×54×24 mm) vs standard size (127×94×48 mm)), is thinner (0.9" vs 1.9"), is much lighter (170 g vs 465 g) and has a built-in flash.

However, on average it records lower quality movies (480p @ 15fps vs 1080p @ 60fps), has a much smaller screen (2.5" vs 3"), has a much lower resolution screen (215k dots vs 921k dots), doesn't have a viewfinder (none vs digital) and takes much lower resolution photos (7.1 MP vs 36.2 MP).

Sony A7R

Sony A7R
7 years newer
$1,898 - $2,849 (body only)
$3,098 28-70mm lens

Significant advantages of the A7R (vs the Stylus 750)

  • Much larger screen: 3" vs 2.5"
  • Much higher true resolution: 36.2 MP vs 7.1 MP
  • Much higher resolution screen: 921k dots vs 215k dots

Significant disadvantages of the A7R (vs the Stylus 750)

  • No image stabilization: None vs
    1. Sensor shift
  • Significantly larger: Standard size (127×94×48 mm) vs Super compact (96×54×24 mm)
  • Much heavier: 465 g vs 170 g

common strengths of the A7R and Stylus 750

  • None found

compared toTravel zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Olympus Stylus 750 compared to travel zoom competitors include: it is slightly smaller (super compact (96×54×24 mm) vs compact (104×60×28 mm)) and has a faster max shutter speed (1/2000 of a second vs 1/1600 of a second).

However, on average it has a much narrower wide angle lens (36 mm vs 24 mm), records lower quality movies (480p @ 15fps vs 720p @ 30fps), has a much smaller screen (2.5" vs 3"), has worse image stabilization (sensor shift vs lens) and takes slightly lower resolution photos (7.1 MP vs 9.7 MP).

Olympus VR-370

Olympus VR-370
6 years newer
$286

Significant advantages of the VR-370 (vs the Stylus 750)

  • Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 36 mm
  • Much larger screen: 3" vs 2.5"
  • Higher resolution movies: 720p vs 480p @ 15fps

Significant disadvantages of the VR-370 (vs the Stylus 750)

  • Larger: Compact (104×60×28 mm) vs Super compact (96×54×24 mm)

common strengths of the VR-370 and Stylus 750

  • Fairly small: Compact (104×60×28 mm) vs Super compact (96×54×24 mm)
  • Thin: 1.1" vs 0.9"
  • Light weight: 172 g vs 170 g

Panasonic Lumix DMC-SZ1

Panasonic Lumix DMC-SZ1
5 years newer
$163

Significant advantages of the DMC-SZ1 (vs the Stylus 750)

  • Much better wide angle: 25 mm vs 36 mm
  • Much larger screen: 3" vs 2.5"
  • Higher resolution movies: 720p @ 30fps vs 480p @ 15fps

Significant disadvantages of the DMC-SZ1 (vs the Stylus 750)

  • Much slower max shutter speed: 1/1600 of a second vs 1/2000 of a second

common strengths of the DMC-SZ1 and Stylus 750

  • Very small: Super compact (99×59×21 mm) vs Super compact (96×54×24 mm)
  • Thin: 0.8" vs 0.9"
  • Light weight: 131 g vs 170 g