As well as being compared against other compacts, the Olympus Stylus 410 is also often compared to travel zooms. The Olympus Stylus 410's top rivals come from Canon (such as the PowerShot S110 and the PowerShot S410) and Olympus (such as the VH-520)

Competitor classes

compared toCompact competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Olympus Stylus 410 compared to other compact competitors include: it has higher quality type of viewfinder (tunnel vs none).

However, on average it has a slightly narrower aperture (f/3.1 vs f/2), has a much narrower wide angle lens (35 mm vs 24 mm), has a much smaller screen (1.5" vs 3"), is much larger (compact (99×56×34 mm) vs compact (87×57×28 mm)) and doesn't have image stabilization (none vs lens).

Canon PowerShot S110

Canon PowerShot S110
8 years newer
$439

Significant advantages of the S110 (vs the Stylus 410)

  • Much larger screen: 3" vs 1.5"
  • Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 35 mm
  • Image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs None

Significant disadvantages of the S110 (vs the Stylus 410)

  • No viewfinder: None vs Tunnel

common strengths of the S110 and Stylus 410

  • Very small: Compact (99×59×27 mm) vs Compact (99×56×34 mm)
  • Light weight: 198 g vs 200 g

Canon PowerShot S410

Placeholder
similar age

Significant advantages of the S410 (vs the Stylus 410)

  • Much smaller: Compact (87×57×28 mm) vs Compact (99×56×34 mm)
  • Thinner: 1.1" vs 1.3"
  • Much faster max shutter speed: 1/2000 of a second vs 1/1000 of a second

Significant disadvantages of the S410 (vs the Stylus 410)

  • None found

common strengths of the S410 and Stylus 410

  • Very small: Compact (87×57×28 mm) vs Compact (99×56×34 mm)
  • Light weight: 215 g vs 200 g
  • Both have tunnel viewfinders: Tunnel vs Tunnel

compared toTravel zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Olympus Stylus 410 compared to travel zoom competitors include: it has a viewfinder (tunnel vs none).

However, on average it has a much narrower wide angle lens (35 mm vs 26 mm), has a much smaller screen (1.5" vs 3"), has a slightly lower resolution screen (134k dots vs 460k dots), is much larger (compact (99×56×34 mm) vs super compact (101×60×21 mm)) and doesn't have image stabilization (none vs sensor shift).

Olympus VH-520

Olympus VH-520
9 years newer

Significant advantages of the VH-520 (vs the Stylus 410)

  • Much larger screen: 3" vs 1.5"
  • Much better wide angle: 26 mm vs 35 mm
  • Much smaller: Super compact (101×60×21 mm) vs Compact (99×56×34 mm)

Significant disadvantages of the VH-520 (vs the Stylus 410)

  • No viewfinder: None vs Tunnel

common strengths of the VH-520 and Stylus 410

  • Very small: Super compact (101×60×21 mm) vs Compact (99×56×34 mm)
  • Very light: 138 g vs 200 g
  • Thin: 0.8" vs 1.3"