Summary Olympus SP-565UZ

Prices Price
Camera only
Unknown
Score Snapsort rank
Among similar cameras
#n/a of 5
Specifications Key specs
Zoom
Help 20x
Screen size
Help 2.5"
Aperture
Help f/2.8
Screen resolution
Help 230k dots
Wide angle
Help 26 mm
Movie format
Help 480p @ 30fps
see all specifications
Olympus SP-565UZOlympus SP-565UZ

gallery

Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Olympus SP-565UZ.

Pros

Report a correction

The Olympus SP-565UZ vs other recent digicams

Aperture Very wide aperture Help
f/2.8
Viewfinder Doesn't use battery, see more detail Help
Digital
Image stabilization Image stabilization Help
  1. Lens
Report a correction

The Olympus SP-565UZ vs other recent super zooms

Size Quite small Help
Prosumer size (116×84×81 mm)
Weight Very light Help
413 g
Thickness Thin Help
3.2"

Cons

Report a correction

The Olympus SP-565UZ vs other recent digicams

Touch screen No touch screen Help
More buttons
Announced Old Help
August 2008
Popularity Not so popular Help
Among snapsort users
Sensor type Sensor type Help
CCD
Thickness Thick Help
3.2"
Report a correction

The Olympus SP-565UZ vs other recent super zooms

Zoom Poor zoom Help
20x
Screen resolution Very low resolution screen Help
230k dots
Light sensitivity Very poor maximum light sensitivity Help
1,600 ISO
Screen flips out Fixed screen Help
Less flexible
External mic jack Lacks an external mic jack Help
Limited to the in-camera mic
External flash No external flash Help
Less expandable
Longest exposure Short exposures Help
1 seconds
Wide angle Poor wide angle lens Help
26 mm
Screen size Small screen Help
2.5"
True resolution Lower true resolution Help
9.8 MP
Autofocus contrast detection autofocus Help
slower focusing
Sensor size Slightly smaller than average sensor Help
1/2.3" 6.13x4.6mm
Fastest shutter speed Slow shutter speed Help
1/2000 of a second

dxomark

DXOMark

Appearance

front photo of the Olympus SP-565UZback photo of the Olympus SP-565UZangle photo of the Olympus SP-565UZ

Discussion

Olympus SP-565UZ
SP-565UZ
Olympus

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments