Summary Olympus SP-320

Prices Price
Camera only
Unknown
Score Snapsort rank
Among similar cameras
#n/a of 12
Specifications Key specs
Zoom
Help 3x
Screen size
Help 2.5"
Aperture
Help f/2.8
Screen resolution
Help 115k dots
Wide angle
Help 38 mm
Movie format
Help 480p @ 30fps
see all specifications
Olympus SP-320Olympus SP-320

gallery

Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Olympus SP-320.

Pros

Report a correction

The Olympus SP-320 vs other recent pro digicams

Built-in flash Built-in flash Help
Usually standard
Thickness Thin Help
1.4"
Viewfinder Doesn't use battery, see more detail Help
Tunnel
Size Quite small Help
Compact (100×65×35 mm)
Weight Light Help
230 g

Cons

Report a correction

The Olympus SP-320 vs other recent pro digicams

Aperture Narrow aperture Help
f/2.8
Movie format Low resolution movies Help
480p @ 30fps
Screen resolution Very low resolution screen Help
115k dots
Image stabilization No image stabilization Help
Risk of blur
Light sensitivity Very poor maximum light sensitivity Help
800 ISO
Touch screen No touch screen Help
More buttons
Screen flips out Fixed screen Help
Less flexible
External mic jack Lacks an external mic jack Help
Limited to the in-camera mic
Sensor type Sensor type Help
CCD
External flash No external flash Help
Less expandable
Longest exposure Short exposures Help
15 seconds
Sensor size Small sensor Help
1/1.8" 7.18x5.32mm
Wide angle Very poor wide angle lens Help
38 mm
Screen size Very small screen Help
2.5"
Continuous shooting Slow continuous shooting Help
2.4 fps
Supports 24p No 24p movies Help
Missing that film look
True resolution Lower true resolution Help
7.1 MP
Autofocus contrast detection autofocus Help
slower focusing
Screen type Screen type Help
LCD
Announced Old Help
January 2006
Fastest shutter speed Slow shutter speed Help
1/2000 of a second
Popularity Not so popular Help
Among snapsort users

Appearance

front photo of the Olympus SP-320back photo of the Olympus SP-320angle photo of the Olympus SP-320

Discussion

Olympus SP-320
SP-320
Olympus

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments