Olympus FE-130

3x, f/3.1, 38 mm
Retailer
    Style
      Color
        You save

        Summary Olympus FE-130

        Prices Price
        Camera only
        Unknown
        Score Snapsort rank
        Among similar cameras
        #n/a of 38
        Specifications Key specs
        Zoom
        Help 3x
        Screen size
        Help 2"
        Aperture
        Help f/3.1
        Screen resolution
        Help Unknown
        Wide angle
        Help 38 mm
        Movie format
        Help 320 x 240 @ 30fps
        see all specifications
        Olympus FE-130Olympus FE-130

        gallery

        Explore our gallery of 22 sample photos taken by the Olympus FE-130.

        Pros

        Report a correction

        The Olympus FE-130 vs other recent compacts

        Size Quite small Help
        Compact (96×63×25 mm)
        Weight Light Help
        160 g
        Thickness Thin Help
        1"

        Cons

        Report a correction

        The Olympus FE-130 vs other recent compacts

        Zoom Below average zoom Help
        3x
        Wide angle Very poor wide angle lens Help
        38 mm
        Image stabilization No image stabilization Help
        Risk of blur
        Supports 24p No 24p movies Help
        Missing that film look
        Screen flips out Fixed screen Help
        Less flexible
        Announced Old Help
        January 2006
        Popularity Not so popular Help
        Among snapsort users
        Movie format Low resolution movies Help
        320 x 240 @ 30fps
        Screen size Very small screen Help
        2"
        Light sensitivity Poor maximum light sensitivity Help
        320 ISO
        True resolution Lower true resolution Help
        5 MP
        Sensor type Sensor type Help
        CCD
        Longest exposure Short exposures Help
        4 seconds

        Appearance

        front photo of the Olympus FE-130back photo of the Olympus FE-130angle photo of the Olympus FE-130

        Discussion

        Olympus FE-130
        FE-130
        Olympus

        Report a correction

        Showing 0 comments