Summary Olympus C-7000 Zoom

Prices Price
Camera only
Unknown
Score Snapsort rank
Among similar cameras
#n/a of 10
Specifications Key specs
Zoom
Help 5x
Screen size
Help 2"
Aperture
Help f/2.8
Screen resolution
Help 206k dots
Wide angle
Help 38 mm
Movie format
Help 480p @ 25fps
see all specifications
Olympus C-7000 ZoomOlympus C-7000 Zoom

Pros

The Olympus C-7000 Zoom vs other recent digicams

Supports RAW Shoots RAW Help
Better editing
Macro focus Good macro Help
2.0 cm
Size Quite small Help
Mid size (102×59×43 mm)
Viewfinder Doesn't use battery, see more detail Help
Tunnel

The Olympus C-7000 Zoom vs other recent pro digicams

Built-in flash Built-in flash Help
Usually standard

Cons

The Olympus C-7000 Zoom vs other recent digicams

Zoom Below average zoom Help
5x
Image stabilization No image stabilization Help
Risk of blur
Announced Old Help
September 2004
Longest exposure Short exposures Help
15 seconds
Movie format Low resolution movies Help
480p @ 25fps
Supports 24p No 24p movies Help
Missing that film look
External flash No external flash Help
Less expandable
Popularity Not so popular Help
Among snapsort users

The Olympus C-7000 Zoom vs other recent pro digicams

Aperture Narrow aperture Help
f/2.8
Wide angle Very poor wide angle lens Help
38 mm
Screen size Very small screen Help
2"
Light sensitivity Poor maximum light sensitivity Help
400 ISO
True resolution Lower true resolution Help
7.1 MP
Autofocus contrast detection autofocus Help
slower focusing
Sensor type Sensor type Help
CCD
Sensor size Small sensor Help
1/1.8" 7.18x5.32mm
Screen resolution Very low resolution screen Help
206k dots
Continuous shooting Slow continuous shooting Help
2.3 fps
Touch screen No touch screen Help
More buttons
Screen flips out Fixed screen Help
Less flexible
Screen type Screen type Help
LCD

Appearance

front photo of the Olympus C-7000 Zoomback photo of the Olympus C-7000 Zoomangle photo of the Olympus C-7000 Zoom

Discussion

Showing 1 comments

Avatar for jefferson Blake Davis jefferson Blake Davis (2:50 AM, October 04, 2012)
I think it was a great camera in 2004 and if you still have one you have a fine 7 megapixel camera with decent lens, excellent build quality, accurate color and it is relatively small. Not like the shirt pocket cameras of today but many of this cameos have inferior lenses, no viewfinder and a short list of features.


This camera does not have image stabilization...no consumer unit did in 2004. Its video ability is basic but usable. The features it does have like panorama, burst-mode, ability to use optional remote, and an automatic lens cover which most modern $100.00 lack, as well as the ability to go completely manual, even manual focus. More important than anything is that it still takes very good photos. It still does a lot of things right.