Generally, some of the advantages of the Nikon D3000 compared to pro DSLR competitors include: it has slightly more color depth (22.3 bits vs 20.4 bits), has a significantly larger screen (3.0" vs 2.5"), uses fast phase detection autofocus (phase detection vs contrast detection), is newer (july, 2009 vs august, 2007) and is slightly smaller (prosumer size 126x97x64 mm vs large 146x123x82 mm).
However, on average it is slightly more noisy at high ISO (563 ISO vs 2,853 ISO), has slightly lower image quality (62.0 vs 95.0), has slightly narrower dynamic range (11.1 EV vs 12 EV), has a slightly lower resolution screen (230k dots vs 921k dots) and slightly smaller viewfinder (0.52x vs 0.62x).
Nikon D70
5 years older
|
Significant advantages of the D70 (vs the D3000)
- Has a built-in focus motor
- Much faster max shutter speed: 1/8000 of a second vs 1/4000 of a second
Significant disadvantages of the D70 (vs the D3000)
- Much smaller screen: 1.8" vs 3.0"
- Worse color depth: 20.4 bits vs 22.3 bits
- Significantly worse image quality: 50.0 vs 62.0
common strengths of the D70 and D3000
- Many lenses available: 169 lenses vs 169 lenses
- Fairly small: Professional size 140x111x78 mm vs Prosumer size 126x97x64 mm
- Supports RAW
|
|
|
|
Nikon D200
3 years older
$1,300 (body only)
|
Significant advantages of the D200 (vs the D3000)
- Weather sealed
- Has a built-in focus motor
- Much faster max shutter speed: 1/8000 of a second vs 1/4000 of a second
Significant disadvantages of the D200 (vs the D3000)
- Much smaller screen: 2.5" vs 3.0"
- Lacks a self cleaning sensor
- Larger: Professional size 147x113x74 mm vs Prosumer size 126x97x64 mm
common strengths of the D200 and D3000
- Many lenses available: 169 lenses vs 169 lenses
- Fairly small: Professional size 147x113x74 mm vs Prosumer size 126x97x64 mm
- Supports RAW
|
|
|
|
Nikon D300
1 year older
$2,000 (body only)
|
Significant advantages of the D300 (vs the D3000)
- Much higher resolution screen: 922k dots vs 230k dots
- More dynamic range: 12 EV vs 11.1 EV
- Has live view
Significant disadvantages of the D300 (vs the D3000)
- Larger: Professional size 147x114x74 mm vs Prosumer size 126x97x64 mm
- Significantly thicker: 2.9" vs 2.5"
- Significantly heavier: 925 g vs 536 g
common strengths of the D300 and D3000
- Many lenses available: 169 lenses vs 169 lenses
- Fairly small: Professional size 147x114x74 mm vs Prosumer size 126x97x64 mm
- Supports RAW
|
|
|
|
Canon EOS 60D
1 year newer
$848 - $1,304 (body only)
$1,177 - $1,342 18-135mm lens
|
Significant advantages of the 60D (vs the D3000)
- Much higher resolution screen: 1,040k dots vs 230k dots
- Has live view
- Shoots movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs None
Significant disadvantages of the 60D (vs the D3000)
- Much thicker: 3.1" vs 2.5"
- Larger: Professional size 145x106x79 mm vs Prosumer size 126x97x64 mm
common strengths of the 60D and D3000
- Many lenses available: 162 lenses vs 169 lenses
- Fairly small: Professional size 145x106x79 mm vs Prosumer size 126x97x64 mm
- Supports RAW
|
|
|
|
Nikon D800
2 years newer
$2,999 - $3,000 (body only)
|
Significant advantages of the D800 (vs the D3000)
- Much lower noise at high ISO: 2,853 ISO vs 563 ISO
- Much better image quality: 95.0 vs 62.0
- More dynamic range: 14.4 EV vs 11.1 EV
Significant disadvantages of the D800 (vs the D3000)
- Significantly fewer lenses available: 121 lenses vs 169 lenses
- Significantly larger: Large 146x123x82 mm vs Prosumer size 126x97x64 mm
- Much thicker: 3.2" vs 2.5"
common strengths of the D800 and D3000
- Fairly small: Large 146x123x82 mm vs Prosumer size 126x97x64 mm
- Supports RAW
- Light weight: 900 g vs 536 g
|
|
|
|
Canon EOS 40D
1 year older
$650 (body only)
|
Significant advantages of the 40D (vs the D3000)
- Has live view
- Shoots faster: 6.5 fps vs 3 fps
- Has a CMOS-family sensor: CMOS vs CCD
Significant disadvantages of the 40D (vs the D3000)
- Slower autofocus: Contrast detection vs Phase detection
- Significantly thicker: 2.9" vs 2.5"
- Heavier: 822 g vs 536 g
common strengths of the 40D and D3000
- Many lenses available: 162 lenses vs 169 lenses
- Fairly small: Professional size 146x108x74 mm vs Prosumer size 126x97x64 mm
- Supports RAW
|
|
|
|