As well as being compared against other compacts, the Nikon Coolpix S570 is also often compared to travel zooms and ultra compacts. The Nikon Coolpix S570's top rivals come from Nikon (such as the Coolpix S4000 and the Coolpix S3000) and Canon (such as the ELPH 100 HS and the ELPH 300 HS)

Competitor classes

compared toCompact competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Nikon S570 compared to other compact competitors include: it has a slightly wider aperture (f/2.7 vs f/3.5).

However, on average it has a significantly smaller screen (2.7" vs 3.5"), has a slightly lower resolution screen (230k dots vs 460k dots), doesn't have image stabilization (none vs lens), doesn't have a touch screen and has a CCD-family sensor (CCD vs CMOS).

Nikon Coolpix S4000

Nikon Coolpix S4000
6 months newer
$289

Significant advantages of the S4000 (vs the S570)

  • Significantly larger screen: 3.0" vs 2.7"
  • Image stabilization: Digital vs None
  • Has a touch screen

Significant disadvantages of the S4000 (vs the S570)

  • Narrower aperture: f/3.2 vs f/2.7
  • Significantly worse macro capability: 8 cm vs 3 cm

common strengths of the S4000 and S570

  • Fairly small: Super compact 95x57x20 mm vs Super compact 92x57x22 mm
  • Light weight: 131 g vs 140 g
arrow Compare the S4000 vs the S570

Nikon Coolpix S3000

Nikon Coolpix S3000
6 months newer
$167

Significant advantages of the S3000 (vs the S570)

  • Image stabilization: Digital vs None

Significant disadvantages of the S3000 (vs the S570)

  • Narrower aperture: f/3.2 vs f/2.7
  • Significantly worse macro capability: 8 cm vs 3 cm

common strengths of the S3000 and S570

  • Fairly small: Super compact 94x56x19 mm vs Super compact 92x57x22 mm
  • Light weight: 116 g vs 140 g
arrow Compare the S3000 vs the S570

Canon ELPH 100 HS

Canon ELPH 100 HS
1 year newer
$103 - $189

Significant advantages of the 100 HS (vs the S570)

  • Image stabilization: Lens vs None
  • Significantly larger screen: 3.0" vs 2.7"
  • Has a CMOS-family sensor: CMOS vs CCD

Significant disadvantages of the 100 HS (vs the S570)

  • None found

common strengths of the 100 HS and S570

  • Wide aperture: f/2.8 vs f/2.7
  • Fairly small: Super compact 93x55x19 mm vs Super compact 92x57x22 mm
  • Good macro capabilities: 3 cm vs 3 cm
arrow Compare the Canon ELPH 100 HS vs the Nikon Coolpix S570

Canon ELPH 300 HS

Canon ELPH 300 HS
1 year newer
$148 - $179

Significant advantages of the 300 HS (vs the S570)

  • Image stabilization: Lens vs None
  • Significantly better wide angle: 24 mm vs 28 mm
  • Has a CMOS-family sensor: CMOS vs CCD

Significant disadvantages of the 300 HS (vs the S570)

  • None found

common strengths of the 300 HS and S570

  • Wide aperture: f/2.7 vs f/2.7
  • Fairly small: Super compact 92x55x19 mm vs Super compact 92x57x22 mm
  • Good macro capabilities: 3 cm vs 3 cm
arrow Compare the Canon ELPH 300 HS vs the Nikon Coolpix S570

Nikon Coolpix S100

Nikon Coolpix S100
2 years newer
$239

Significant advantages of the S100 (vs the S570)

  • Much larger screen: 3.5" vs 2.7"
  • Has an OLED screen: OLED vs LCD
  • Image stabilization: Lens vs None

Significant disadvantages of the S100 (vs the S570)

  • Much narrower aperture: f/3.9 vs f/2.7

common strengths of the S100 and S570

  • Fairly small: Super compact 99x65x18 mm vs Super compact 92x57x22 mm
  • Good macro capabilities: 1 cm vs 3 cm
  • Light weight: 138 g vs 140 g
arrow Compare the S100 vs the S570

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T300

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T300
1 year older

Significant advantages of the DSC-T300 (vs the S570)

  • Much larger screen: 3.5" vs 2.7"
  • Image stabilization: Lens vs None

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-T300 (vs the S570)

  • Significantly narrower aperture: f/3.5 vs f/2.7
  • Much worse wide angle: 33 mm vs 28 mm

common strengths of the DSC-T300 and S570

  • Fairly small: Super compact 94x59x21 mm vs Super compact 92x57x22 mm
  • Good macro capabilities: 1 cm vs 3 cm
arrow Compare the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T300 vs the Nikon Coolpix S570

compared toTravel zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Nikon S570 compared to travel zoom competitors include: it has a slightly wider aperture (f/2.7 vs f/3.3), is slightly smaller (super compact 92x57x22 mm vs compact 104x60x30 mm), slightly closer macro focusing (3 cm vs 10 cm), is thinner (0.9" vs 1.2") and is slightly lighter (140 g vs 209 g).

However, on average it has slightly less zoom (5x vs 14x), has a slightly smaller screen (2.7" vs 3.0"), has a slightly lower resolution screen (230k dots vs 461k dots), doesn't have image stabilization (none vs lens) and has a CCD-family sensor (CCD vs CMOS).

Nikon Coolpix S6200

Nikon Coolpix S6200
2 years newer
$177 - $223

Significant advantages of the S6200 (vs the S570)

  • Significantly better wide angle: 25 mm vs 28 mm
  • Image stabilization: Lens vs None

Significant disadvantages of the S6200 (vs the S570)

  • Narrower aperture: f/3.2 vs f/2.7
  • Much worse macro capability: 10 cm vs 3 cm

common strengths of the S6200 and S570

  • Fairly small: Compact 93x58x26 mm vs Super compact 92x57x22 mm
  • Light weight: 160 g vs 140 g
  • Thin: 1" vs 0.9"
arrow Compare the S6200 vs the S570

Nikon Coolpix S8100

Nikon Coolpix S8100
1 year newer
$100

Significant advantages of the S8100 (vs the S570)

  • Much higher resolution screen: 921k dots vs 230k dots
  • Image stabilization: Sensor shift, Lens vs None
  • Significantly larger screen: 3.0" vs 2.7"

Significant disadvantages of the S8100 (vs the S570)

  • Significantly narrower aperture: f/3.5 vs f/2.7
  • Significantly larger: Compact 104x60x30 mm vs Super compact 92x57x22 mm
  • Significantly heavier: 209 g vs 140 g

common strengths of the S8100 and S570

  • None found
arrow Compare the S8100 vs the S570

Kodak EasyShare M580

Kodak EasyShare M580
5 months newer
$111

Significant advantages of the M580 (vs the S570)

  • Significantly larger screen: 3.0" vs 2.7"

Significant disadvantages of the M580 (vs the S570)

  • Much worse macro capability: 10 cm vs 3 cm

common strengths of the M580 and S570

  • Fairly small: Compact 100x59x25 mm vs Super compact 92x57x22 mm
  • Light weight: 150 g vs 140 g
  • Thin: 1" vs 0.9"
arrow Compare the Kodak EasyShare M580 vs the Nikon Coolpix S570

Canon PowerShot A4000 IS

Canon PowerShot A4000 IS
2 years newer
$169

Significant advantages of the A4000 IS (vs the S570)

  • Image stabilization: Lens vs None
  • Significantly larger screen: 3.0" vs 2.7"

Significant disadvantages of the A4000 IS (vs the S570)

  • None found

common strengths of the A4000 IS and S570

  • Fairly small: Compact 95x56x24 mm vs Super compact 92x57x22 mm
  • Light weight: 145 g vs 140 g
  • Thin: 0.9" vs 0.9"
arrow Compare the Canon PowerShot A4000 IS vs the Nikon Coolpix S570

Canon PowerShot SX220 HS

Canon PowerShot SX220 HS
1 year newer
$281 - $332

Significant advantages of the SX220 HS (vs the S570)

  • Significantly more zoom: 14x vs 5x
  • Image stabilization: Lens vs None
  • Significantly larger screen: 3.0" vs 2.7"

Significant disadvantages of the SX220 HS (vs the S570)

  • Much larger: Compact 106x59x33 mm vs Super compact 92x57x22 mm
  • Much heavier: 215 g vs 140 g
  • Much thicker: 1.3" vs 0.9"

common strengths of the SX220 HS and S570

  • None found
arrow Compare the Canon PowerShot SX220 HS vs the Nikon Coolpix S570

Samsung PL210

Samsung PL210
1 year newer
$166

Significant advantages of the PL210 (vs the S570)

  • Image stabilization: Lens, Digital vs None
  • Significantly larger screen: 3.0" vs 2.7"

Significant disadvantages of the PL210 (vs the S570)

  • Significantly narrower aperture: f/3.3 vs f/2.7

common strengths of the PL210 and S570

  • Very small: Super compact 100x58x19 mm vs Super compact 92x57x22 mm
  • Thin: 0.8" vs 0.9"
  • Light weight: 148 g vs 140 g
arrow Compare the Samsung PL210 vs the Nikon Coolpix S570

compared toUltra compact competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Nikon S570 compared to ultra compact competitors include: it has a slightly wider aperture (f/2.7 vs f/3.2) and significantly closer macro focusing (3 cm vs 8 cm).

However, on average it is slightly larger (super compact 92x57x22 mm vs ultra compact 90x52x19 mm), doesn't have image stabilization (none vs digital), is older (august, 2009 vs february, 2011) and is thicker (0.9" vs 0.7").

Nikon Coolpix S3100

Nikon Coolpix S3100
1 year newer
$132

Significant advantages of the S3100 (vs the S570)

  • Image stabilization: Sensor shift vs None
  • Can create panoramas in-camera

Significant disadvantages of the S3100 (vs the S570)

  • Narrower aperture: f/3.2 vs f/2.7
  • Much worse macro capability: 10 cm vs 3 cm

common strengths of the S3100 and S570

  • None found
arrow Compare the S3100 vs the S570

Samsung TL105

Samsung TL105
5 months newer

Significant advantages of the TL105 (vs the S570)

  • Image stabilization: Digital vs None
  • Significantly lighter: 96 g vs 140 g
  • Thinner: 0.6" vs 0.9"

Significant disadvantages of the TL105 (vs the S570)

  • Narrower aperture: f/3.2 vs f/2.7
  • Significantly worse macro capability: 8 cm vs 3 cm

common strengths of the TL105 and S570

  • None found
arrow Compare the Samsung TL105 vs the Nikon Coolpix S570

Casio Exilim EX-Z90

Casio Exilim EX-Z90
similar age
$154

Significant advantages of the EX-Z90 (vs the S570)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the EX-Z90 (vs the S570)

  • Much worse wide angle: 35 mm vs 28 mm
  • Much worse macro capability: 10 cm vs 3 cm

common strengths of the EX-Z90 and S570

  • Capture very high resolution images: 9.8 MP vs 9.8 MP
arrow Compare the Casio Exilim EX-Z90 vs the Nikon Coolpix S570

Samsung PL120

Samsung PL120
1 year newer
$90 - $109

Significant advantages of the PL120 (vs the S570)

  • Image stabilization: Digital vs None
  • Has a touch screen

Significant disadvantages of the PL120 (vs the S570)

  • Significantly narrower aperture: f/3.3 vs f/2.7

common strengths of the PL120 and S570

  • None found
arrow Compare the Samsung PL120 vs the Nikon Coolpix S570

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T90

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T90
5 months older
$477

Significant advantages of the DSC-T90 (vs the S570)

  • Image stabilization: Lens vs None
  • Significantly larger screen: 3.0" vs 2.7"
  • Significantly thinner: 0.6" vs 0.9"

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-T90 (vs the S570)

  • Much worse wide angle: 35 mm vs 28 mm
  • Significantly narrower aperture: f/3.5 vs f/2.7

common strengths of the DSC-T90 and S570

  • Capture very high resolution images: 9.8 MP vs 9.8 MP
arrow Compare the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T90 vs the Nikon Coolpix S570

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W330

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W330
5 months newer
$139 - $149

Significant advantages of the DSC-W330 (vs the S570)

  • Significantly larger screen: 3.0" vs 2.7"

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-W330 (vs the S570)

  • None found

common strengths of the DSC-W330 and S570

  • Wide aperture: f/2.7 vs f/2.7
  • Capture very high resolution images: 9.8 MP vs 9.8 MP
arrow Compare the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W330 vs the Nikon Coolpix S570