As well as being compared against other compacts, the Nikon Coolpix S570 is also often compared to ultra compacts, travel zooms, mirrorless and digicams. The Nikon Coolpix S570's top rivals come from Sony (such as the Cyber-shot DSC-S750 and the Cyber-shot DSC-W320) and Nikon (such as the Coolpix S3100 and the Coolpix S3000)

compared toCompact competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Nikon S570 compared to other compact competitors include: it has a slightly wider aperture (f/2.7 vs f/3.2), takes slightly higher resolution photos (9.8 MP vs 7.1 MP) and slightly closer macro focusing (3 cm vs 5 cm).

However, on average it doesn't have image stabilization (none vs lens), is older (august, 2009 vs february, 2010) and is less popular.

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S750

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S750
1 year older

Significant advantages of the DSC-S750 (vs the S570)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-S750 (vs the S570)

  • Much lower true resolution: 7.1 MP vs 9.8 MP
  • Much worse wide angle: 35 mm vs 28 mm
  • Significantly smaller sensor: 1/2.5" 5.8x4.3mm vs 1/2.3" 6.2x4.6mm

common strengths of the DSC-S750 and S570

  • Wide aperture: f/2.8 vs f/2.7
arrow Compare the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S750 vs the Nikon Coolpix S570

Canon ELPH 100 HS

Canon ELPH 100 HS
1 year newer
$102 - $189

Significant advantages of the 100 HS (vs the S570)

  • Image stabilization: Lens vs None
  • Significantly larger screen: 3.0" vs 2.7"
  • Has a CMOS-family sensor: CMOS vs CCD

Significant disadvantages of the 100 HS (vs the S570)

  • None found

common strengths of the 100 HS and S570

  • Wide aperture: f/2.8 vs f/2.7
  • Fairly small: Super compact 93x55x19 mm vs Super compact 92x57x22 mm
  • Good macro capabilities: 3 cm vs 3 cm
arrow Compare the Canon ELPH 100 HS vs the Nikon Coolpix S570

Nikon Coolpix S3000

Nikon Coolpix S3000
6 months newer
$104 - $215

Significant advantages of the S3000 (vs the S570)

  • Image stabilization: Digital vs None

Significant disadvantages of the S3000 (vs the S570)

  • Narrower aperture: f/3.2 vs f/2.7
  • Significantly worse macro capability: 8 cm vs 3 cm

common strengths of the S3000 and S570

  • Fairly small: Super compact 94x56x19 mm vs Super compact 92x57x22 mm
  • Light weight: 116 g vs 140 g
  • Inexpensive: $104.37 vs $138.81
arrow Compare the S3000 vs the S570

Sony Cybershot W520

Sony Cybershot DSC-W520
1 year newer
$128 - $145

Significant advantages of the W520 (vs the S570)

  • Better wide angle: 25 mm vs 28 mm
  • Image stabilization: Digital vs None

Significant disadvantages of the W520 (vs the S570)

  • Significantly narrower aperture: f/3.3 vs f/2.7

common strengths of the W520 and S570

  • Fairly small: Super compact 96x55x21 mm vs Super compact 92x57x22 mm
  • Light weight: 125 g vs 140 g
  • Inexpensive: $128.48 vs $138.81
arrow Compare the Sony Cybershot DSC-W520 vs the Nikon Coolpix S570

Canon PowerShot A3300 IS

Canon PowerShot A3300 IS
1 year newer
$98 - $103

Significant advantages of the A3300 IS (vs the S570)

  • Image stabilization: Lens vs None
  • Significantly larger screen: 3.0" vs 2.7"

Significant disadvantages of the A3300 IS (vs the S570)

  • None found

common strengths of the A3300 IS and S570

  • Wide aperture: f/2.8 vs f/2.7
  • Good macro capabilities: 3 cm vs 3 cm
  • Inexpensive: $98.00 vs $138.81
arrow Compare the Canon PowerShot A3300 IS vs the Nikon Coolpix S570

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS15

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS15
6 months older
$266

Significant advantages of the DMC-FS15 (vs the S570)

  • Image stabilization: Lens vs None
  • Has boost ISO: 6,400 ISO vs None

Significant disadvantages of the DMC-FS15 (vs the S570)

  • Significantly narrower aperture: f/3.3 vs f/2.7

common strengths of the DMC-FS15 and S570

  • Fairly small: Super compact 97x54x22 mm vs Super compact 92x57x22 mm
  • Light weight: 136 g vs 140 g
arrow Compare the Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS15 vs the Nikon Coolpix S570

compared toUltra compact competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Nikon S570 compared to ultra compact competitors include: it has a slightly wider aperture (f/2.7 vs f/3.1) and slightly closer macro focusing (3 cm vs 8 cm).

However, on average it is slightly larger (super compact 92x57x22 mm vs ultra compact 93x52x17 mm), doesn't have image stabilization (none vs sensor shift), is older (august, 2009 vs january, 2011) and is thicker (0.9" vs 0.6").

Nikon Coolpix S3100

Nikon Coolpix S3100
1 year newer
$77 - $80

Significant advantages of the S3100 (vs the S570)

  • Image stabilization: Sensor shift vs None

Significant disadvantages of the S3100 (vs the S570)

  • Narrower aperture: f/3.2 vs f/2.7
  • Much worse macro capability: 10 cm vs 3 cm

common strengths of the S3100 and S570

  • None found
arrow Compare the S3100 vs the S570

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W320

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W320
5 months newer
$175

Significant advantages of the DSC-W320 (vs the S570)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-W320 (vs the S570)

  • None found

common strengths of the DSC-W320 and S570

  • Wide aperture: f/2.7 vs f/2.7
  • Capture very high resolution images: 9.8 MP vs 9.8 MP
arrow Compare the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W320 vs the Nikon Coolpix S570

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T90

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T90
5 months older
$477

Significant advantages of the DSC-T90 (vs the S570)

  • Image stabilization: Lens vs None
  • Significantly larger screen: 3.0" vs 2.7"
  • Significantly thinner: 0.6" vs 0.9"

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-T90 (vs the S570)

  • Much worse wide angle: 35 mm vs 28 mm
  • Significantly narrower aperture: f/3.5 vs f/2.7

common strengths of the DSC-T90 and S570

  • Capture very high resolution images: 9.8 MP vs 9.8 MP
arrow Compare the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T90 vs the Nikon Coolpix S570

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W350

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W350
5 months newer
$139 - $183

Significant advantages of the DSC-W350 (vs the S570)

  • Image stabilization: Lens vs None

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-W350 (vs the S570)

  • None found

common strengths of the DSC-W350 and S570

  • Wide aperture: f/2.7 vs f/2.7
  • Capture very high resolution images: 9.8 MP vs 9.8 MP
arrow Compare the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W350 vs the Nikon Coolpix S570

Samsung TL105

Samsung TL105
5 months newer
$79

Significant advantages of the TL105 (vs the S570)

  • Image stabilization: Digital vs None
  • Significantly lighter: 96 g vs 140 g
  • Thinner: 0.6" vs 0.9"

Significant disadvantages of the TL105 (vs the S570)

  • Narrower aperture: f/3.2 vs f/2.7
  • Significantly worse macro capability: 8 cm vs 3 cm

common strengths of the TL105 and S570

  • None found
arrow Compare the Samsung TL105 vs the Nikon Coolpix S570

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH2

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH2
1 year newer
$129

Significant advantages of the DMC-FH2 (vs the S570)

  • Image stabilization: Lens vs None
  • Has boost ISO: 6,400 ISO vs None

Significant disadvantages of the DMC-FH2 (vs the S570)

  • None found

common strengths of the DMC-FH2 and S570

  • None found
arrow Compare the Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH2 vs the Nikon Coolpix S570

compared toTravel zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Nikon S570 compared to travel zoom competitors include: it has a significantly wider aperture (f/2.7 vs f/3.4), takes slightly higher resolution photos (9.8 MP vs 7.1 MP), slightly higher maximum light sensitivity (3,200 ISO vs 1,600 ISO), is thinner (0.9" vs 1.5") and is slightly lighter (140 g vs 280 g).

However, on average it doesn't have a built-in GPS, has a significantly smaller screen (2.7" vs 3.0"), has a slightly lower resolution screen (230k dots vs 461k dots), doesn't have image stabilization (none vs lens, sensor shift) and has a CCD-family sensor (CCD vs CMOS).

Nikon Coolpix S8100

Nikon Coolpix S8100
1 year newer
$300

Significant advantages of the S8100 (vs the S570)

  • Image stabilization: Lens, Sensor shift vs None
  • Significantly higher resolution screen: 921k dots vs 230k dots
  • Significantly larger screen: 3.0" vs 2.7"

Significant disadvantages of the S8100 (vs the S570)

  • Significantly narrower aperture: f/3.5 vs f/2.7

common strengths of the S8100 and S570

  • None found
arrow Compare the S8100 vs the S570

Canon PowerShot SX230 HS

Canon PowerShot SX230 HS
1 year newer
$219 - $304

Significant advantages of the SX230 HS (vs the S570)

  • Has a GPS
  • Image stabilization: Lens vs None
  • Significantly larger screen: 3.0" vs 2.7"

Significant disadvantages of the SX230 HS (vs the S570)

  • None found

common strengths of the SX230 HS and S570

  • None found
arrow Compare the Canon PowerShot SX230 HS vs the Nikon Coolpix S570

Canon PowerShot SX130 IS

Canon PowerShot SX130 IS
1 year newer
$127 - $245

Significant advantages of the SX130 IS (vs the S570)

  • Image stabilization: Lens vs None
  • Significantly larger screen: 3.0" vs 2.7"

Significant disadvantages of the SX130 IS (vs the S570)

  • Significantly narrower aperture: f/3.4 vs f/2.7
  • Significantly heavier: 308 g vs 140 g

common strengths of the SX130 IS and S570

  • Inexpensive: $126.70 vs $138.81
arrow Compare the Canon PowerShot SX130 IS vs the Nikon Coolpix S570

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH25

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH25
1 year newer
$125 - $150

Significant advantages of the DMC-FH25 (vs the S570)

  • Image stabilization: Lens vs None
  • Has boost ISO: 6,400 ISO vs None

Significant disadvantages of the DMC-FH25 (vs the S570)

  • Significantly narrower aperture: f/3.3 vs f/2.7

common strengths of the DMC-FH25 and S570

  • Inexpensive: $124.95 vs $138.81
arrow Compare the Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH25 vs the Nikon Coolpix S570

Panasonic Lumix DMC-TZ3

Panasonic Lumix DMC-TZ3
2 years older

Significant advantages of the DMC-TZ3 (vs the S570)

  • Image stabilization: Lens vs None
  • Significantly larger screen: 3.0" vs 2.7"

Significant disadvantages of the DMC-TZ3 (vs the S570)

  • Significantly narrower aperture: f/3.3 vs f/2.7
  • Much lower true resolution: 7.1 MP vs 9.8 MP
  • Smaller sensor: 1/2.7" 5.7x4.3mm vs 1/2.3" 6.2x4.6mm

common strengths of the DMC-TZ3 and S570

  • None found
arrow Compare the Panasonic Lumix DMC-TZ3 vs the Nikon Coolpix S570

compared toMirrorless interchangeable-lens competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Nikon S570 compared to mirrorless interchangeable-lens competitors include: it is slightly smaller (super compact 92x57x22 mm vs mid size 119x71x36 mm), is much less expensive ($138.81 vs $999.99), is thinner (0.9" vs 1.5"), is significantly lighter (140 g vs 330 g) and has a built-in flash.

However, on average it has a much smaller screen (2.7" vs 3.0"), has a significantly lower resolution screen (230k dots vs 920k dots), takes slightly lower resolution photos (9.8 MP vs 14 MP), slightly lower maximum light sensitivity (3,200 ISO vs 12,800 ISO) and doesn't have a screen which flips out.

Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF1

Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF1
similar age
$1,000 20mm lens

Significant advantages of the DMC-GF1 (vs the S570)

  • Much larger screen: 3.0" vs 2.7"
  • Shoots RAW
  • Has interchangeable lenses

Significant disadvantages of the DMC-GF1 (vs the S570)

  • Larger: Mid size 119x71x36 mm vs Super compact 92x57x22 mm
  • Much heavier: 330 g vs 140 g
  • Thicker: 1.4" vs 0.9"

common strengths of the DMC-GF1 and S570

  • Each has a built-in flash
arrow Compare the Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF1 vs the Nikon Coolpix S570

Sony Alpha NEX-5

Sony Alpha NEX-5
9 months newer
$569 18-55mm lens

Significant advantages of the NEX-5 (vs the S570)

  • Much larger screen: 3.0" vs 2.7"
  • Much higher resolution screen: 920k dots vs 230k dots
  • Much larger sensor: APS-C 23.4x15.6mm vs 1/2.3" 6.2x4.6mm

Significant disadvantages of the NEX-5 (vs the S570)

  • Significantly heavier: 287 g vs 140 g
  • Significantly thicker: 1.5" vs 0.9"
  • No built-in flash

common strengths of the NEX-5 and S570

  • Fairly small: Compact 111x59x38 mm vs Super compact 92x57x22 mm
  • Light weight: 287 g vs 140 g
arrow Compare the Sony Alpha NEX-5 vs the Nikon Coolpix S570

compared toDigicam competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Nikon S570 compared to digicam competitors include: it has a much wider wide angle lens (28 mm vs 35 mm), has a much larger screen (2.7" vs 2.0"), takes much higher resolution photos (9.8 MP vs 7.1 MP), slightly higher maximum light sensitivity (3,200 ISO vs 800 ISO) and has a marginally larger sensor (1/2.3" 6.2x4.6mm vs 1/2.5" 5.8x4.3mm).

However, on average it doesn't have a viewfinder (none vs tunnel).

Canon PowerShot A550

Canon PowerShot A550
2 years older

Significant advantages of the A550 (vs the S570)

  • Has a viewfinder: Tunnel vs None

Significant disadvantages of the A550 (vs the S570)

  • Much smaller screen: 2.0" vs 2.7"
  • Much worse wide angle: 35 mm vs 28 mm
  • Much lower true resolution: 7.1 MP vs 9.8 MP

common strengths of the A550 and S570

  • Wide aperture: f/2.6 vs f/2.7
arrow Compare the Canon PowerShot A550 vs the Nikon Coolpix S570