Generally, some of the advantages of the Nikon S230 compared to travel zoom competitors include: it has a slightly larger screen (3" vs 2.7") and shoots faster continuously (11 fps vs 0.8 fps).
However, on average it has a much narrower wide angle lens (35 mm vs 28 mm), is older (february 2009 vs january 2015) and is slightly more expensive ($279.00 vs $134.47).
Canon PowerShot ELPH 160
6 years newer
$134
Significant advantages of the ELPH 160 (vs the S230)
- Much better wide angle: 28 mm vs 35 mm
Significant disadvantages of the ELPH 160 (vs the S230)
- Shoots significantly slower: 0.8 fps vs 11 fps
common strengths of the ELPH 160 and S230
- Very small: Super compact (95×54×22 mm) vs Super compact (57×91×20 mm)
- Very thin: 0.9" vs 0.8"
- Very light: 127 g vs 115 g