Generally, some of the advantages of the Nikon P5100 compared to entry-level DSLR competitors include: it has better image stabilization (lens vs none), is much smaller (mid size 98x65x41 mm vs prosumer size 127x96x78 mm), is thinner (1.6" vs 3") and is much lighter (250 g vs 598 g).
However, on average it records lower quality movies (480p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 24fps), has a much smaller screen (2.5" vs 3.0"), has a significantly lower resolution screen (230k dots vs 920k dots), takes significantly lower resolution photos (12 MP vs 17.9 MP) and slightly lower maximum light sensitivity (2,000 ISO vs 12,800 ISO).
Nikon D5100
3 years newer
$500 - $597 (body only)
$600 - $697 18-55mm lens
|
Significant advantages of the D5100 (vs the P5100)
- Much larger sensor: APS-C 23.6x15.6mm vs 1/1.8" 7.4x5.6mm
- Much larger screen: 3.0" vs 2.5"
- Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs 480p @ 30fps
Significant disadvantages of the D5100 (vs the P5100)
- No image stabilization: None vs Lens
- Much larger: Prosumer size 127x96x78 mm vs Mid size 98x65x41 mm
- Much thicker: 3.1" vs 1.6"
common strengths of the D5100 and P5100
- Fairly small: Prosumer size 127x96x78 mm vs Mid size 98x65x41 mm
- Inexpensive: $499.99 vs $532.82
|
|
|
|
Nikon D3100
3 years newer
$500 - $547 18-55mm lens
|
Significant advantages of the D3100 (vs the P5100)
- Much larger sensor: APS-C 23.1x15.4mm vs 1/1.8" 7.4x5.6mm
- Much larger screen: 3.0" vs 2.5"
- Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 24fps vs 480p @ 30fps
Significant disadvantages of the D3100 (vs the P5100)
- No image stabilization: None vs Lens
- Much larger: Prosumer size 124x96x73 mm vs Mid size 98x65x41 mm
- Much thicker: 2.9" vs 1.6"
common strengths of the D3100 and P5100
- Fairly small: Prosumer size 124x96x73 mm vs Mid size 98x65x41 mm
- Thin: 2.9" vs 1.6"
- Light weight: 505 g vs 250 g
|
|
|
|
Canon Rebel T3i
3 years newer
$619 - $700 (body only)
$745 - $1,000 18-55mm lens
|
Significant advantages of the T3i (vs the P5100)
- Much larger sensor: APS-C 22.3x14.9mm vs 1/1.8" 7.4x5.6mm
- Much larger screen: 3.0" vs 2.5"
- Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs 480p @ 30fps
Significant disadvantages of the T3i (vs the P5100)
- No image stabilization: None vs Lens
- Much larger: Professional size 133x99x79 mm vs Mid size 98x65x41 mm
- Much thicker: 3.1" vs 1.6"
common strengths of the T3i and P5100
|
|
|
|
Nikon D7000
3 years newer
$1,000 - $1,197 (body only)
$1,100 55-200mm lens
|
Significant advantages of the D7000 (vs the P5100)
- Much larger sensor: APS-C 23.6x15.6mm vs 1/1.8" 7.4x5.6mm
- Much larger screen: 3.0" vs 2.5"
- Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 24fps vs 480p @ 30fps
Significant disadvantages of the D7000 (vs the P5100)
- No image stabilization: None vs Lens
- Much larger: Professional size 132x105x77 mm vs Mid size 98x65x41 mm
- Much thicker: 3" vs 1.6"
common strengths of the D7000 and P5100
|
|
|
|
Nikon D3200
4 years newer
$699 - $700 18-55mm lens
|
Significant advantages of the D3200 (vs the P5100)
- Much larger sensor: APS-C 23.2x15.4mm vs 1/1.8" 7.4x5.6mm
- Much larger screen: 3.0" vs 2.5"
- Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs 480p @ 30fps
Significant disadvantages of the D3200 (vs the P5100)
- No image stabilization: None vs Lens
- Much larger: Prosumer size 125x96x76 mm vs Mid size 98x65x41 mm
- Much thicker: 3" vs 1.6"
common strengths of the D3200 and P5100
- Fairly small: Prosumer size 125x96x76 mm vs Mid size 98x65x41 mm
- Light weight: 455 g vs 250 g
|
|
|
|
Pentax K-r
3 years newer
$647 - $649 18-55mm lens
|
Significant advantages of the K-r (vs the P5100)
- Much larger sensor: APS-C 23.6x15.8mm vs 1/1.8" 7.4x5.6mm
- Much larger screen: 3.0" vs 2.5"
- Faster autofocus: Phase detection vs Contrast detection
Significant disadvantages of the K-r (vs the P5100)
- Much larger: Prosumer size 125x97x68 mm vs Mid size 98x65x41 mm
- Much thicker: 2.7" vs 1.6"
- Much heavier: 598 g vs 250 g
common strengths of the K-r and P5100
- Good image stabilization: Sensor shift vs Lens
- Very small: Prosumer size 125x97x68 mm vs Mid size 98x65x41 mm
- Very thin: 2.7" vs 1.6"
|
|
|
|