As well as being compared against other super zooms, the Nikon Coolpix L110 is also often compared to entry-level DSLRs, ultra compacts, compacts and travel zooms. The Nikon Coolpix L110's top rivals come from Nikon (such as the Coolpix L310 and the Coolpix L810) and Canon (such as the EOS Digital Rebel and the EOS Digital Rebel XT)

compared toSuper zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Nikon L110 compared to other super zoom competitors include: it has a slightly larger screen (3" vs 1.8") and has an external mic jack.

However, on average it has a slightly narrower aperture (f/3.5 vs f/2.8), has a slightly narrower wide angle lens (28 mm vs 26 mm), doesn't have a screen which flips out, has a CCD-family sensor (CCD vs CMOS) and is older (february 2010 vs february 2012).

Nikon Coolpix L310

Nikon Coolpix L310
2 years newer
$270

Significant advantages of the L310 (vs the L110)

  • Significantly better wide angle: 25 mm vs 28 mm
  • Significantly faster max shutter speed: 1/4000 of a second vs 1/2000 of a second

Significant disadvantages of the L310 (vs the L110)

  • Lacks an external mic jack
  • Lower resolution screen: 230k dots vs 460k dots

common strengths of the L310 and L110

  • Very small: Prosumer size (110×77×78 mm) vs Standard size (109×74×78 mm)
  • Very light: 435 g vs 406 g
  • Thin: 3.1" vs 3.1"

Nikon Coolpix L810

Nikon Coolpix L810
2 years newer
$277

Significant advantages of the L810 (vs the L110)

  • Much better wide angle: 23 mm vs 28 mm
  • Much higher resolution screen: 921k dots vs 460k dots
  • Better image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs
    1. Sensor shift

Significant disadvantages of the L810 (vs the L110)

  • Lacks an external mic jack
  • Slower max shutter speed: 1/1500 of a second vs 1/2000 of a second

common strengths of the L810 and L110

  • Very small: Prosumer size (111×76×83 mm) vs Standard size (109×74×78 mm)
  • Very light: 430 g vs 406 g
  • Thin: 3.3" vs 3.1"

Nikon Coolpix P900

Nikon Coolpix P900
5 years newer
$458 - $597

Significant advantages of the P900 (vs the L110)

  • Significantly more zoom: 83.3x vs 15x
  • Significantly wider aperture: f/2.8 vs f/3.5
  • Has a CMOS-family sensor: CMOS vs CCD

Significant disadvantages of the P900 (vs the L110)

  • Significantly larger: Large (140×103×137 mm) vs Standard size (109×74×78 mm)
  • Lacks an external mic jack
  • Significantly heavier: 899 g vs 406 g

common strengths of the P900 and L110

  • None found

Fujifilm FinePix S1600

Fujifilm FinePix S1600
similar age

Significant advantages of the S1600 (vs the L110)

  • Has a viewfinder: Digital vs None

Significant disadvantages of the S1600 (vs the L110)

  • Lacks an external mic jack
  • Lower resolution screen: 230k dots vs 460k dots

common strengths of the S1600 and L110

  • Very small: Prosumer size (110×73×81 mm) vs Standard size (109×74×78 mm)
  • Very light: 337 g vs 406 g
  • Thin: 3.2" vs 3.1"

Nikon Coolpix P90

Nikon Coolpix P90
1 year older
$1,000

Significant advantages of the P90 (vs the L110)

  • Significantly wider aperture: f/2.8 vs f/3.5
  • Has a flip-out screen
  • Better image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs
    1. Sensor shift

Significant disadvantages of the P90 (vs the L110)

  • Lacks an external mic jack
  • Lower resolution screen: 230k dots vs 460k dots

common strengths of the P90 and L110

  • Fairly small: Prosumer size (83×114×99 mm) vs Standard size (109×74×78 mm)
  • Very light: 400 g vs 406 g
  • Thin: 3.9" vs 3.1"

Nikon Coolpix 8700

Nikon Coolpix 8700
6 years older

Significant advantages of the 8700 (vs the L110)

  • Significantly wider aperture: f/2.8 vs f/3.5
  • Supports an external flash
  • Has a viewfinder: Digital vs None

Significant disadvantages of the 8700 (vs the L110)

  • Much worse wide angle: 35 mm vs 28 mm
  • Much smaller screen: 1.8" vs 3"
  • No image stabilization: None vs
    1. Sensor shift

common strengths of the 8700 and L110

  • Fairly small: Prosumer size (113×105×78 mm) vs Standard size (109×74×78 mm)
  • Light weight: 512 g vs 406 g
  • Thin: 3.1" vs 3.1"

compared toEntry-level DSLR competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Nikon L110 compared to entry-level DSLR competitors include: it records lower quality movies (720p @ 30fps vs none), has a much larger screen (3" vs 1.8"), has a much higher resolution screen (460k dots vs 118k dots), has image stabilization (sensor shift vs none) and takes much higher resolution photos (9.8 MP vs 8 MP).

However, on average it doesn't shoot as fast continuously (1 fps vs 2.8 fps), has a much smaller sensor (1/2.3" 6.16x4.62mm vs APS-C 23.6x15.8mm), doesn't have a viewfinder (none vs pentamirror), users slower contrast detection autofocus (contrast detection vs phase detection) and has a built-in lens.

Canon EOS Digital Rebel

Placeholder
6 years older
$499 (body only)
$349 - $449 18-55mm lens

Significant advantages of the Rebel (vs the L110)

  • Has a viewfinder: Pentamirror vs None
  • Has interchangeable lenses
  • Shoots significantly faster: 2.5 fps vs 1 fps

Significant disadvantages of the Rebel (vs the L110)

  • Much lower true resolution: 6.3 MP vs 9.8 MP
  • Much smaller screen: 1.8" vs 3"
  • Much lower resolution screen: 118k dots vs 460k dots

common strengths of the Rebel and L110

  • None found

Canon EOS Digital Rebel XT

Placeholder
5 years older
$400 18-55mm lens

Significant advantages of the Rebel XT (vs the L110)

  • Has a viewfinder: Pentamirror vs None
  • Has interchangeable lenses
  • Shoots significantly faster: 2.8 fps vs 1 fps

Significant disadvantages of the Rebel XT (vs the L110)

  • Much lower true resolution: 8 MP vs 9.8 MP
  • Much smaller screen: 1.8" vs 3"
  • Much lower resolution screen: 115k dots vs 460k dots

common strengths of the Rebel XT and L110

  • Very small: Prosumer size (127×94×64 mm) vs Standard size (109×74×78 mm)

Nikon D60

Nikon D60
2 years older
$398 18-55mm lens

Significant advantages of the D60 (vs the L110)

  • Has a viewfinder: Pentamirror vs None
  • Much higher true resolution: 10 MP vs 9.8 MP
  • Has interchangeable lenses

Significant disadvantages of the D60 (vs the L110)

  • Much smaller screen: 2.5" vs 3"
  • No image stabilization: None vs
    1. Sensor shift
  • Much lower resolution screen: 230k dots vs 460k dots

common strengths of the D60 and L110

  • Very small: Prosumer size (126×94×64 mm) vs Standard size (109×74×78 mm)

compared toUltra compact competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Nikon L110 compared to ultra compact competitors include: it has a much wider wide angle lens (28 mm vs 39 mm), has a significantly larger screen (3" vs 1.5"), has a slightly higher resolution screen (460k dots vs 78k dots), has better image stabilization (sensor shift vs none) and takes slightly higher resolution photos (9.8 MP vs 5 MP).

However, on average it is much larger (standard size (109×74×78 mm) vs ultra compact (90×47×19 mm)), doesn't have a touch screen, is thicker (3.1" vs 0.6") and is much heavier (406 g vs 140 g).

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T77

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T77
1 year older

Significant advantages of the DSC-T77 (vs the L110)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-T77 (vs the L110)

  • None found

common strengths of the DSC-T77 and L110

  • None found

Canon PowerShot SD20

Placeholder
5 years older
$139

Significant advantages of the SD20 (vs the L110)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the SD20 (vs the L110)

  • None found

common strengths of the SD20 and L110

  • None found

compared toCompact competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Nikon L110 compared to compact competitors include: it has a slightly larger screen (3" vs 2.7"), has a slightly higher resolution screen (460k dots vs 230k dots), has better image stabilization (sensor shift vs digital) and has an external mic jack.

However, on average it has a slightly narrower wide angle lens (28 mm vs 26 mm), is much larger (standard size (109×74×78 mm) vs compact (59×96×29 mm)), is older (february 2010 vs january 2013), is thicker (3.1" vs 1.1") and is much heavier (406 g vs 161 g).

Nikon Coolpix L27

Nikon Coolpix L27
3 years newer
$221

Significant advantages of the L27 (vs the L110)

  • Much smaller: Compact (59×96×29 mm) vs Standard size (109×74×78 mm)
  • Much thinner: 1.1" vs 3.1"
  • Much lighter: 161 g vs 406 g

Significant disadvantages of the L27 (vs the L110)

  • Lacks an external mic jack
  • Worse image stabilization:
    1. Digital
    vs
    1. Sensor shift

common strengths of the L27 and L110

  • Each has a built-in flash

compared toTravel zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Nikon L110 compared to travel zoom competitors include: it has an external mic jack.

However, on average it has a significantly narrower wide angle lens (28 mm vs 25 mm), has a significantly lower resolution screen (460k dots vs 961k dots), is much larger (standard size (109×74×78 mm) vs compact (104×59×33 mm)), has worse image stabilization (sensor shift vs lens) and doesn't shoot as fast continuously (1 fps vs 7.5 fps).

Nikon Coolpix S9400

Nikon Coolpix S9400
3 years newer

Significant advantages of the S9400 (vs the L110)

  • Much smaller: Compact (109×61×31 mm) vs Standard size (109×74×78 mm)
  • Significantly better wide angle: 25 mm vs 28 mm
  • Much thinner: 1.2" vs 3.1"

Significant disadvantages of the S9400 (vs the L110)

  • Lacks an external mic jack

common strengths of the S9400 and L110

  • None found

Nikon Coolpix S8200

Nikon Coolpix S8200
1 year newer

Significant advantages of the S8200 (vs the L110)

  • Much smaller: Compact (104×59×33 mm) vs Standard size (109×74×78 mm)
  • Significantly better wide angle: 25 mm vs 28 mm
  • Has a CMOS-family sensor: CMOS vs CCD

Significant disadvantages of the S8200 (vs the L110)

  • Lacks an external mic jack

common strengths of the S8200 and L110

  • None found