As well as being compared against other super zooms, the Nikon Coolpix L110 is also often compared to entry-level DSLRs and travel zooms. The Nikon Coolpix L110's top rivals come from Nikon (such as the Coolpix L120 and the Coolpix L810) and Fujifilm (such as the FinePix S2950 and the FinePix S1800)

compared toSuper zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Nikon L110 compared to other super zoom competitors include: it is slightly smaller (standard size 109x74x78 mm vs prosumer size 110x90x91 mm) and slightly higher boost light sensitivity (6,400 ISO vs none).

However, on average it has a slightly narrower aperture (f/3.5 vs f/2.8), has significantly less zoom (15x vs 25.4x), has a slightly narrower wide angle lens (28 mm vs 26 mm), doesn't shoot as fast continuously (1 fps vs 10 fps) and doesn't have a screen which flips out.

Nikon Coolpix L120

Nikon Coolpix L120
1 year newer
$180 - $218

Significant advantages of the L120 (vs the L110)

  • Significantly higher resolution screen: 920k dots vs 460k dots
  • Significantly better wide angle: 25 mm vs 28 mm

Significant disadvantages of the L120 (vs the L110)

  • None found

common strengths of the L120 and L110

  • Fairly small: Prosumer size 110x77x78 mm vs Standard size 109x74x78 mm
  • Light weight: 406 g vs 406 g
  • Thin: 3.1" vs 3.1"
arrow Compare the L120 vs the L110

Nikon Coolpix L810

Nikon Coolpix L810
2 years newer
$250 - $265

Significant advantages of the L810 (vs the L110)

  • Much better wide angle: 23 mm vs 28 mm
  • Significantly more zoom: 25.4x vs 15x
  • Significantly higher resolution screen: 921k dots vs 460k dots

Significant disadvantages of the L810 (vs the L110)

  • Slower max shutter speed: 1/1500 of a second vs 1/2000 of a second

common strengths of the L810 and L110

  • Fairly small: Prosumer size 111x76x83 mm vs Standard size 109x74x78 mm
  • Light weight: 430 g vs 406 g
  • Thin: 3.3" vs 3.1"
arrow Compare the Coolpix L810 vs the Coolpix L110

Fujifilm FinePix S2950

Fujifilm FinePix S2950
1 year newer
$159 - $160

Significant advantages of the S2950 (vs the L110)

  • Can create panoramas in-camera
  • Has a viewfinder: Digital vs None

Significant disadvantages of the S2950 (vs the L110)

  • None found

common strengths of the S2950 and L110

  • Fairly small: Prosumer size 110x73x81 mm vs Standard size 109x74x78 mm
  • Light weight: 437 g vs 406 g
  • Thin: 3.2" vs 3.1"
arrow Compare the Fujifilm FinePix S2950 vs the Nikon Coolpix L110

Nikon Coolpix P100

Nikon Coolpix P100
similar age

Significant advantages of the P100 (vs the L110)

  • Significantly wider aperture: f/2.8 vs f/3.5
  • Significantly more zoom: 26.1x vs 15x
  • Has a flip-out screen

Significant disadvantages of the P100 (vs the L110)

  • Larger: Prosumer size 114x83x99 mm vs Standard size 109x74x78 mm
  • No boost ISO: None vs 6,400 ISO

common strengths of the P100 and L110

  • None found
arrow Compare the P100 vs the L110

Olympus SP-600 UZ

Olympus SP-600 UZ
similar age
$305

Significant advantages of the SP-600 UZ (vs the L110)

  • Shoots significantly faster: 10 fps vs 1 fps

Significant disadvantages of the SP-600 UZ (vs the L110)

  • No image stabilization: None vs Sensor shift
  • Significantly smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.0"
  • No boost ISO: None vs 6,400 ISO

common strengths of the SP-600 UZ and L110

  • Light weight: 455 g vs 406 g
arrow Compare the Olympus SP-600 UZ vs the Nikon Coolpix L110

Kodak EasyShare Z981

Kodak EasyShare Z981
similar age
$270

Significant advantages of the Z981 (vs the L110)

  • Significantly wider aperture: f/2.8 vs f/3.5
  • Significantly more zoom: 26x vs 15x
  • Shoots RAW

Significant disadvantages of the Z981 (vs the L110)

  • Significantly larger: Professional size 124x85x105 mm vs Standard size 109x74x78 mm
  • Thicker: 4.1" vs 3.1"
  • Heavier: 540 g vs 406 g

common strengths of the Z981 and L110

  • None found
arrow Compare the Kodak EasyShare Z981 vs the Nikon Coolpix L110

compared toEntry-level DSLR competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Nikon L110 compared to entry-level DSLR competitors include: it has a slightly larger screen (3.0" vs 2.7"), has better image stabilization (sensor shift vs none), is newer (february, 2010 vs august, 2008), is much smaller (standard size 109x74x78 mm vs professional size 130x100x78 mm) and is significantly lighter (406 g vs 598 g).

However, on average it takes slightly lower resolution photos (9.8 MP vs 12.2 MP), slightly lower maximum light sensitivity (1,600 ISO vs 6,400 ISO), doesn't record movies in 24p, doesn't shoot as fast continuously (1 fps vs 4.5 fps) and has a much smaller sensor (1/2.3" 6.2x4.6mm vs APS-C 23.1x15.4mm).

Nikon D3100

Nikon D3100
6 months newer
$500 - $547 18-55mm lens

Significant advantages of the D3100 (vs the L110)

  • Much larger sensor: APS-C 23.1x15.4mm vs 1/2.3" 6.2x4.6mm
  • Has a viewfinder: Pentamirror vs None
  • Faster autofocus: Phase detection vs Contrast detection

Significant disadvantages of the D3100 (vs the L110)

  • No image stabilization: None vs Sensor shift
  • Significantly larger: Prosumer size 124x96x73 mm vs Standard size 109x74x78 mm

common strengths of the D3100 and L110

  • Larger than average screens: 3.0" vs 3.0"
  • Fairly small: Prosumer size 124x96x73 mm vs Standard size 109x74x78 mm
  • Light weight: 505 g vs 406 g
arrow Compare the D3100 vs the Coolpix L110

Pentax K-r

Pentax K-r
7 months newer
$647 - $649 18-55mm lens

Significant advantages of the K-r (vs the L110)

  • Much larger sensor: APS-C 23.6x15.8mm vs 1/2.3" 6.2x4.6mm
  • Has a viewfinder: Pentamirror vs None
  • Faster autofocus: Phase detection vs Contrast detection

Significant disadvantages of the K-r (vs the L110)

  • Significantly larger: Prosumer size 125x97x68 mm vs Standard size 109x74x78 mm
  • Significantly heavier: 598 g vs 406 g

common strengths of the K-r and L110

  • Larger than average screens: 3.0" vs 3.0"
  • Good image stabilization: Sensor shift vs Sensor shift
  • Very small: Prosumer size 125x97x68 mm vs Standard size 109x74x78 mm
arrow Compare the Pentax K-r vs the Nikon Coolpix L110

Nikon D90

Nikon D90
1 year older
$830 - $897 (body only)
$1,047 55-200mm lens

Significant advantages of the D90 (vs the L110)

  • Much larger sensor: APS-C 23.6x15.8mm vs 1/2.3" 6.2x4.6mm
  • Has a viewfinder: Pentaprism vs None
  • Faster autofocus: Phase detection vs Contrast detection

Significant disadvantages of the D90 (vs the L110)

  • No image stabilization: None vs Sensor shift
  • Much larger: Professional size 132x103x77 mm vs Standard size 109x74x78 mm
  • Much heavier: 703 g vs 406 g

common strengths of the D90 and L110

  • Larger than average screens: 3.0" vs 3.0"
arrow Compare the D90 vs the Coolpix L110

Canon EOS Digital Rebel XSi

Canon EOS Digital Rebel XSi
2 years older
$468 (body only)
$599 18-55mm lens

Significant advantages of the Rebel XSi (vs the L110)

  • Much larger sensor: APS-C 22.2x14.8mm vs 1/2.3" 6.2x4.6mm
  • Has a viewfinder: Pentamirror vs None
  • Faster autofocus: Phase detection vs Contrast detection

Significant disadvantages of the Rebel XSi (vs the L110)

  • No image stabilization: None vs Sensor shift
  • Does not take movies: None vs 720p @ 30fps
  • Larger: Prosumer size 129x98x62 mm vs Standard size 109x74x78 mm

common strengths of the Rebel XSi and L110

  • Larger than average screens: 3.0" vs 3.0"
  • Very small: Prosumer size 129x98x62 mm vs Standard size 109x74x78 mm
  • Light weight: 524 g vs 406 g
arrow Compare the Canon EOS Digital Rebel XSi vs the Nikon Coolpix L110

Canon Rebel T3

Canon Rebel T3
1 year newer
$333 (body only)
$489 - $500 18-55mm lens

Significant advantages of the T3 (vs the L110)

  • Much larger sensor: APS-C 22.2x14.7mm vs 1/2.3" 6.2x4.6mm
  • Has a viewfinder: Pentamirror vs None
  • Faster autofocus: Phase detection vs Contrast detection

Significant disadvantages of the T3 (vs the L110)

  • Much smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.0"
  • No image stabilization: None vs Sensor shift
  • Much larger: Professional size 130x100x78 mm vs Standard size 109x74x78 mm

common strengths of the T3 and L110

  • Light weight: 459 g vs 406 g
arrow Compare the Canon Rebel T3 vs the Nikon Coolpix L110

Sony Alpha DSLR-A100

Sony Alpha DSLR-A100
3 years older

Significant advantages of the DSLR-A100 (vs the L110)

  • Much larger sensor: APS-C 23.6x15.8mm vs 1/2.3" 6.2x4.6mm
  • Has a viewfinder: Pentamirror vs None
  • Shoots RAW

Significant disadvantages of the DSLR-A100 (vs the L110)

  • Much smaller screen: 2.5" vs 3.0"
  • Does not take movies: None vs 720p @ 30fps
  • Much larger: Prosumer size 133x95x71 mm vs Standard size 109x74x78 mm

common strengths of the DSLR-A100 and L110

  • Good image stabilization: Sensor shift vs Sensor shift
  • Fairly small: Prosumer size 133x95x71 mm vs Standard size 109x74x78 mm
arrow Compare the Sony Alpha DSLR-A100 vs the Nikon Coolpix L110

compared toTravel zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Nikon L110 compared to travel zoom competitors include: it slightly closer macro focusing (1 cm vs 4 cm).

However, on average it has a slightly narrower wide angle lens (28 mm vs 25 mm), doesn't have a built-in GPS, records lower quality movies (720p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps), is slightly larger (standard size 109x74x78 mm vs compact 105x62x35 mm) and doesn't record high-speed movies (none vs 240 fps).

Canon PowerShot SX130 IS

Canon PowerShot SX130 IS
6 months newer
$141 - $245

Significant advantages of the SX130 IS (vs the L110)

  • Significantly thinner: 1.8" vs 3.1"

Significant disadvantages of the SX130 IS (vs the L110)

  • No boost ISO: None vs 6,400 ISO

common strengths of the SX130 IS and L110

  • Good macro capabilities: 1 cm vs 1 cm
arrow Compare the Canon PowerShot SX130 IS vs the Nikon Coolpix L110

Canon PowerShot SX150 IS

Canon PowerShot SX150 IS
1 year newer
$128 - $179

Significant advantages of the SX150 IS (vs the L110)

  • Significantly thinner: 1.8" vs 3.1"

Significant disadvantages of the SX150 IS (vs the L110)

  • None found

common strengths of the SX150 IS and L110

  • Good macro capabilities: 1 cm vs 1 cm
arrow Compare the Canon PowerShot SX150 IS vs the Nikon Coolpix L110

Fujifilm FinePix F550 EXR

Fujifilm FinePix F550 EXR
1 year newer
$248

Significant advantages of the F550 EXR (vs the L110)

  • Has a GPS
  • Significantly better wide angle: 24 mm vs 28 mm
  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs 720p @ 30fps

Significant disadvantages of the F550 EXR (vs the L110)

  • Significantly worse macro capability: 5 cm vs 1 cm

common strengths of the F550 EXR and L110

  • None found
arrow Compare the Fujifilm FinePix F550 EXR vs the Nikon Coolpix L110

Nikon Coolpix S9100

Nikon Coolpix S9100
1 year newer
$273 - $328

Significant advantages of the S9100 (vs the L110)

  • Significantly better wide angle: 25 mm vs 28 mm
  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs 720p @ 30fps
  • Significantly higher resolution screen: 921k dots vs 460k dots

Significant disadvantages of the S9100 (vs the L110)

  • None found

common strengths of the S9100 and L110

  • None found
arrow Compare the S9100 vs the L110