Nikon Coolpix 2500

3x, f/2.7, 37 mm
Retailer
    Style
      Color
        You save

        Summary Nikon 2500

        Prices Price
        Camera only
        $324
        all 2500 prices
        Score Snapsort rank
        Within its price range
        #n/a of 5
        Among similar cameras
        #n/a of 14
        Specifications Key specs
        Zoom
        Help 3x
        Screen size
        Help 1.5"
        Aperture
        Help f/2.7
        Screen resolution
        Help 110k dots
        Wide angle
        Help 37 mm
        Movie format
        Help Unknown
        see all specifications

        gallery

        Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Nikon Coolpix 2500.

        Pros

        The Nikon 2500 vs other recent compacts

        Built-in flash Built-in flash Help
        Usually standard
        Lowest price Inexpensive Help
        $323.84

        Cons

        The Nikon 2500 vs other recent compacts

        Zoom Below average zoom Help
        3x
        Screen resolution Very low resolution screen Help
        110k dots
        Size Slightly large Help
        Compact (114×60×32 mm)
        Light sensitivity Very poor maximum light sensitivity Help
        400 ISO
        True resolution Lower true resolution Help
        1.9 MP
        Sensor size Slightly smaller than average sensor Help
        1/3" 5.27x3.96mm
        Announced Old Help
        February 2002
        Viewfinder Can only preview photos on the screen Help
        None
        Popularity Not so popular Help
        Among snapsort users
        Wide angle Very poor wide angle lens Help
        37 mm
        Screen size Small screen Help
        1.5"
        Image stabilization No image stabilization Help
        Risk of blur
        Touch screen No touch screen Help
        More buttons
        Screen flips out Fixed screen Help
        Less flexible
        Sensor type Sensor type Help
        CCD
        Weight Heavy Help
        250 g
        Longest exposure Short exposures Help
        2 seconds

        Discussion

        Showing 0 comments