Nikon Coolpix S9300

18x, f/3.5, 25 mm
Retailer
    Style
      Color
        You save

        Summary Nikon S9300

        Prices Price
        Camera only
        $349
        all S9300 prices
        Score Snapsort rank
        Within its price range
        #n/a of 9
        Among similar cameras
        #n/a of 11
        Specifications Key specs
        Zoom
        Help 18x
        Screen size
        Help 3"
        Aperture
        Help f/3.5
        Screen resolution
        Help 921k dots
        Wide angle
        Help 25 mm
        Movie format
        Help 1080p @ 30fps
        see all specifications
        Nikon Coolpix S9300Nikon Coolpix S9300

        Replacement

        Nikon has replaced the Coolpix S9300 with the S9500.

        Nikon Coolpix S9500
        Nikon Coolpix S9500 announced January 2013
        Screen type Has an OLED screen
        Zoom More zoom
        Aperture Slightly wider aperture

        Compare the new Nikon S9500 vs the S9300

        gallery

        Explore our gallery of 3 sample photos taken by the Nikon Coolpix S9300.

        Videos

        Nikon Coolpix S9300 Camera Rev...

        Nikon Coolpix S9300 Camera Review
        • Image quality
        • Review

        Pros

        Report a correction

        The Nikon S9300 vs other recent compacts

        Zoom Above average zoom Help
        18x
        Screen resolution High resolution screen Help
        921k dots
        High-speed framerate High speed movies Help
        120 fps
        Sensor type CMOS Sensor Help
        Better in low light
        Movie format Full HD Help
        1080p @ 30fps
        Screen size Above average sized screen Help
        3"
        Image stabilization Image stabilization Help
        1. Lens
        Fastest shutter speed Fast shutter speed Help
        1/4000 of a second
        Report a correction

        The Nikon S9300 vs other recent travel zooms

        GPS Built-in GPS Help
        Great for travel

        Cons

        Report a correction

        The Nikon S9300 vs other recent compacts

        Size Slightly large Help
        Compact (109×62×31 mm)
        Screen flips out Fixed screen Help
        Less flexible
        Thickness Thick Help
        1.2"
        Popularity Not so popular Help
        Among snapsort users
        Light sensitivity Poor maximum light sensitivity Help
        3,200 ISO
        Announced Old Help
        February 2012
        Weight Heavy Help
        215 g
        Report a correction

        The Nikon S9300 vs other recent travel zooms

        Zoom Below average zoom Help
        18x
        Continuous shooting Slow continuous shooting Help
        6.9 fps
        Battery life Shorter battery life Help
        200 shots
        Longest exposure Short exposures Help
        4 seconds
        Movie format Full HD Help
        1080p @ 30fps
        Touch screen No touch screen Help
        More buttons
        Viewfinder Can only preview photos on the screen Help
        None

        Appearance

        front photo of the Nikon Coolpix S9300back photo of the Nikon Coolpix S9300angle photo of the Nikon Coolpix S9300

        Discussion

        Nikon Coolpix S9300
        Coolpix S9300
        Nikon

        Report a correction

        Showing 5 comments

        Guest (3:25 PM, May 28, 2012)
        If it's 200 shots for the battery life then how much video can it contain before the batter dies?
         
        Ccrtorres (3:03 AM, May 18, 2012)
        very good
         
        Avatar for Snapsort Snapsort (3:06 PM, April 19, 2012)
        I think so: 
        http://snapsort.com/compare/Nikon-S8200-vs-Nikon-S9300
         
        Asingleton08 (3:02 PM, April 19, 2012)
        Is the S9300 worth the extra $100 over the s8200. I bought the S8200 but haven't opened it and am debating retruning it and going with the S9300.
         
        Al (11:02 AM, April 09, 2012)


        ¿Which one of the new 2012 travel zoom cameras of
        Canon (SX 240 and SX 260), Nikon S9300) and Sony (HX20V) is better in photo
        quality? ¿What about in video quality? Thanks.