Nikon has replaced the Coolpix P300 with the P310.
|
Nikon Coolpix P310 announced February, 2012
|
|
|
![]() |
Nikon Coolpix P300 |
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Nikon has replaced the Coolpix P300 with the P310.
|
Nikon Coolpix P310 announced February, 2012
|
"At 100%, even low ISO images look 'crunchy' due to noise reduction and sharpening"dpreview.com | talking about the camera's iso-noise
"The P300's BSI (back side illuminated) CMOS sensor does pretty well in most shooting conditions and in normal use, image quality compares well to those of its peers with similar-sized sensors."dpreview.com | talking about the camera's image-quality
"Build quality is very high, and the same standard of construction applies to the main control points."dpreview.com | talking about the camera's build-quality
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||


Speech is free, but discussion at Snapsort is moderated! Please discuss your opinion of this camera here, and discuss feedback for Snapsort at our support community.
Showing 25 comments
I think this is an error
This camera can take up to 8fps in full resolution and more in smaller resolutions (up to 120fps)
Each have a number of advantages, I think the P7000 will have better image quality due to its larger sensor.
We have the sensor size as 6.2x4.6mm, is that not correct?
How big is 1/2.3"? :) A lot of people like to quote sensor size as fractions, like 1/2.5". Snapsort "translates" the actual sensor size (6.2 x 4.6mm) into a fraction, but its not very precise, it groups all sensors into one of: 1/3.6", 1/2.5", 1/1.7", four-thirds, aps-h, aps-c, full-frame.
http://www.nikonusa.com/Nikon-Products/Product/Compact-Digital-Cameras/26246/COOLPIX-P300.html#tab-ProductDetail.ProductTabs.TechSpecs