Nikon Coolpix L810 Competitors

25.4x, f/3.1, 23 mm
Retailer
    Style
      Color
        You save

        As well as being compared against other super zooms, the Nikon Coolpix L810 is also often compared to entry-level DSLRs and travel zooms. The Nikon Coolpix L810's top rivals come from Nikon (such as the Coolpix L820 and the Coolpix L320) and Sony (such as the CyberShot DSC-H200 and the CyberShot DSC-H300)

        Competitor classes

        compared toSuper zoom competitors

        Generally, some of the advantages of the Nikon L810 compared to other super zoom competitors include: it has a significantly higher resolution screen (921k dots vs 461k dots) and captures 3D images.

        However, on average it is older (february, 2012 vs august, 2012) and is less popular.

        Nikon Coolpix L820

        Nikon Coolpix L820
        1 year newer
        $180 - $279

        Significant advantages of the L820 (vs the L810)

        • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs 720p @ 30fps
        • Has a CMOS-family sensor: CMOS vs CCD
        • Has in-camera HDR

        Significant disadvantages of the L820 (vs the L810)

        • None found

        common strengths of the L820 and L810

        • High resolution screens: 921k dots vs 921k dots
        • Fairly small: Prosumer size 111x76x85 mm vs Prosumer size 111x76x83 mm
        • Both can take 3D photos, many cameras like these don't
        arrow Compare the Coolpix L820 vs the Coolpix L810

        Sony CyberShot DSC-H200

        Sony CyberShot DSC-H200
        1 year newer
        $188 - $232

        Significant advantages of the DSC-H200 (vs the L810)

        • None found

        Significant disadvantages of the DSC-H200 (vs the L810)

        • Significantly lower resolution screen: 460k dots vs 921k dots
        • Doesn't take 3D photos

        common strengths of the DSC-H200 and L810

        • Fairly small: Prosumer size 123x83x87 mm vs Prosumer size 111x76x83 mm
        • Inexpensive: $179.00 vs $198.00
        arrow Compare the Sony CyberShot DSC-H200 vs the Nikon Coolpix L810

        Panasonic Lumix DMC-LZ20

        Panasonic Lumix DMC-LZ20
        5 months newer
        $265

        Significant advantages of the DMC-LZ20 (vs the L810)

        • None found

        Significant disadvantages of the DMC-LZ20 (vs the L810)

        • Significantly lower resolution screen: 460k dots vs 921k dots
        • Doesn't take 3D photos

        common strengths of the DMC-LZ20 and L810

        • Fairly small: Prosumer size 120x76x80 mm vs Prosumer size 111x76x83 mm
        • Thin: 3.1" vs 3.3"
        arrow Compare the Panasonic Lumix DMC-LZ20 vs the Nikon Coolpix L810

        Nikon Coolpix L320

        Nikon Coolpix L320
        1 year newer
        $115

        Significant advantages of the L320 (vs the L810)

        • None found

        Significant disadvantages of the L320 (vs the L810)

        • Much lower resolution screen: 230k dots vs 921k dots
        • Doesn't take 3D photos

        common strengths of the L320 and L810

        • Fairly small: Prosumer size 111x76x83 mm vs Prosumer size 111x76x83 mm
        • Light weight: 430 g vs 430 g
        • Thin: 3.3" vs 3.3"
        arrow Compare the Coolpix L320 vs the Coolpix L810

        Nikon Coolpix L120

        Nikon Coolpix L120
        1 year older
        $425

        Significant advantages of the L120 (vs the L810)

        • None found

        Significant disadvantages of the L120 (vs the L810)

        • Doesn't take 3D photos
        • Lacks in-camera panoramic stitching

        common strengths of the L120 and L810

        • High resolution screens: 920k dots vs 921k dots
        • Fairly small: Prosumer size 110x77x78 mm vs Prosumer size 111x76x83 mm
        • Light weight: 406 g vs 430 g
        arrow Compare the Coolpix L120 vs the Coolpix L810

        Canon PowerShot SX500 IS

        Canon PowerShot SX500 IS
        6 months newer
        $179 - $275

        Significant advantages of the SX500 IS (vs the L810)

        • None found

        Significant disadvantages of the SX500 IS (vs the L810)

        • Significantly lower resolution screen: 461k dots vs 921k dots

        common strengths of the SX500 IS and L810

        • Fairly small: Standard size 104x69x80 mm vs Prosumer size 111x76x83 mm
        • Light weight: 341 g vs 430 g
        • Thin: 3.2" vs 3.3"
        arrow Compare the Canon PowerShot SX500 IS vs the Nikon Coolpix L810

        compared toEntry-level DSLR competitors

        Generally, some of the advantages of the Nikon L810 compared to entry-level DSLR competitors include: it has a slightly larger screen (3.0" vs 2.7"), has a much higher resolution screen (921k dots vs 230k dots), has image stabilization (lens vs none), creates panoramas in-camera and captures 3D images.

        However, on average it records lower quality movies (720p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 24fps), takes significantly lower resolution photos (9.7 MP vs 24.2 MP), doesn't record movies in 24p, doesn't shoot as fast continuously (1.2 fps vs 4 fps) and doesn't have a screen which flips out.

        Nikon D3200

        Nikon D3200
        similar age
        $497 18-55mm lens

        Significant advantages of the D3200 (vs the L810)

        • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs 720p @ 30fps
        • Much larger sensor: APS-C 23.2x15.4mm vs 1/2.3" 6.2x4.6mm
        • Has a viewfinder: Pentamirror vs None

        Significant disadvantages of the D3200 (vs the L810)

        • No image stabilization: None vs Lens
        • Doesn't take 3D photos
        • Lacks in-camera panoramic stitching

        common strengths of the D3200 and L810

        • Inexpensive: $496.95 vs $198.00
        • Light weight: 505 g vs 430 g
        arrow Compare the D3200 vs the Coolpix L810

        Nikon D3100

        Nikon D3100
        1 year older
        $389 - $427 18-55mm lens

        Significant advantages of the D3100 (vs the L810)

        • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 24fps vs 720p @ 30fps
        • Much larger sensor: APS-C 23.1x15.4mm vs 1/2.3" 6.2x4.6mm
        • Has a viewfinder: Pentamirror vs None

        Significant disadvantages of the D3100 (vs the L810)

        • Much lower resolution screen: 230k dots vs 921k dots
        • No image stabilization: None vs Lens
        • Doesn't take 3D photos

        common strengths of the D3100 and L810

        • Fairly small: Prosumer size 124x96x73 mm vs Prosumer size 111x76x83 mm
        • Very inexpensive: $284.99 vs $198.00
        • Light weight: 505 g vs 430 g
        arrow Compare the D3100 vs the Coolpix L810

        Nikon D5000

        Nikon D5000
        2 years older
        $877 - $1,140 (body only)

        Significant advantages of the D5000 (vs the L810)

        • Much larger sensor: APS-C 23.6x15.8mm vs 1/2.3" 6.2x4.6mm
        • Has a viewfinder: Pentamirror vs None
        • Much less shutter lag: 276 ms vs 580 ms

        Significant disadvantages of the D5000 (vs the L810)

        • Much lower resolution screen: 230k dots vs 921k dots
        • Significantly smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.0"
        • No image stabilization: None vs Lens

        common strengths of the D5000 and L810

        • None found
        arrow Compare the D5000 vs the Coolpix L810

        Canon Rebel T3

        Canon Rebel T3
        1 year older
        $276 - $298 (body only)
        $385 - $450 18-55mm lens

        Significant advantages of the T3 (vs the L810)

        • Much larger sensor: APS-C 22.2x14.7mm vs 1/2.3" 6.2x4.6mm
        • Has a viewfinder: Pentamirror vs None
        • Faster autofocus: Phase detection vs Contrast detection

        Significant disadvantages of the T3 (vs the L810)

        • Much lower resolution screen: 230k dots vs 921k dots
        • Significantly smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.0"
        • No image stabilization: None vs Lens

        common strengths of the T3 and L810

        • Very inexpensive: $275.99 vs $198.00
        • Light weight: 459 g vs 430 g
        arrow Compare the Canon Rebel T3 vs the Nikon Coolpix L810

        compared toTravel zoom competitors

        Generally, some of the advantages of the Nikon L810 compared to travel zoom competitors include: it has a slightly wider wide angle lens (23 mm vs 28 mm), has a slightly wider aperture (f/3.1 vs f/3.5), has a significantly higher resolution screen (921k dots vs 230k dots), creates panoramas in-camera and captures 3D images.

        However, on average it doesn't have a built-in GPS, records lower quality movies (720p @ 30fps vs 1080p), is slightly larger (prosumer size 111x76x83 mm vs mid size 108x69x34 mm), doesn't have a touch screen and doesn't record movies in 24p.

        Canon PowerShot SX160 IS

        Canon PowerShot SX160 IS
        6 months newer
        $113 - $149

        Significant advantages of the SX160 IS (vs the L810)

        • Thinner: 1.7" vs 3.3"

        Significant disadvantages of the SX160 IS (vs the L810)

        • Much lower resolution screen: 230k dots vs 921k dots
        • Worse wide angle: 28 mm vs 23 mm
        • Doesn't take 3D photos

        common strengths of the SX160 IS and L810

        • Good macro capabilities: 1 cm vs 1 cm
        arrow Compare the Canon PowerShot SX160 IS vs the Nikon Coolpix L810

        Nikon Coolpix L610

        Nikon Coolpix L610
        6 months newer
        $139

        Significant advantages of the L610 (vs the L810)

        • Higher resolution movies: 1080p vs 720p @ 30fps
        • Has a CMOS-family sensor: CMOS vs CCD
        • Smaller: Mid size 108x69x34 mm vs Prosumer size 111x76x83 mm

        Significant disadvantages of the L610 (vs the L810)

        • Significantly lower resolution screen: 460k dots vs 921k dots
        • Significantly shorter battery life: 120 shots vs 300 shots

        common strengths of the L610 and L810

        • Both can take 3D photos, many cameras like these don't
        • Good macro capabilities: 1 cm vs 1 cm
        • In-camera panoramas
        arrow Compare the Coolpix L610 vs the Coolpix L810

        Canon PowerShot SX170 IS

        Canon PowerShot SX170 IS
        1 year newer
        $130 - $184

        Significant advantages of the SX170 IS (vs the L810)

        • Thinner: 1.7" vs 3.3"

        Significant disadvantages of the SX170 IS (vs the L810)

        • Much lower resolution screen: 230k dots vs 921k dots
        • Worse wide angle: 28 mm vs 23 mm
        • Doesn't take 3D photos

        common strengths of the SX170 IS and L810

        • Good macro capabilities: 1 cm vs 1 cm
        arrow Compare the Canon PowerShot SX170 IS vs the Nikon Coolpix L810

        Samsung WB250F

        Samsung WB250F
        1 year newer
        $111 - $169

        Significant advantages of the WB250F (vs the L810)

        • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs 720p @ 30fps
        • Has a touch screen
        • Significantly smaller: Compact 107x62x22 mm vs Prosumer size 111x76x83 mm

        Significant disadvantages of the WB250F (vs the L810)

        • Significantly lower resolution screen: 460k dots vs 921k dots
        • Doesn't take 3D photos
        • Significantly worse macro capability: 5 cm vs 1 cm

        common strengths of the WB250F and L810

        • In-camera panoramas
        arrow Compare the Samsung WB250F vs the Nikon Coolpix L810

        Canon PowerShot SX260 HS

        Canon PowerShot SX260 HS
        similar age
        $200 - $300

        Significant advantages of the SX260 HS (vs the L810)

        • Has a GPS
        • Supports 24p
        • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 24fps vs 720p @ 30fps

        Significant disadvantages of the SX260 HS (vs the L810)

        • Significantly lower resolution screen: 461k dots vs 921k dots
        • Doesn't take 3D photos
        • Significantly worse macro capability: 5 cm vs 1 cm

        common strengths of the SX260 HS and L810

        • In-camera panoramas
        arrow Compare the Canon PowerShot SX260 HS vs the Nikon Coolpix L810