As well as being compared against other super zooms, the Nikon Coolpix L810 is also often compared to entry-level DSLRs, pro DSLRs and travel zooms. The Nikon Coolpix L810's top rivals come from Nikon (such as the Coolpix L820 and the Coolpix L830) and Canon (such as the PowerShot SX510 HS and the PowerShot SX160 IS)

compared toSuper zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Nikon L810 compared to other super zoom competitors include: it has a slightly higher resolution screen (921k dots vs 460k dots), creates panoramas in-camera and captures 3D images.

However, on average it has a CCD-family sensor (CCD vs CMOS), lacks a built in HDR feature, is older (february, 2012 vs january, 2013) and is less popular.

Nikon Coolpix L820

Nikon Coolpix L820
1 year newer
$202 - $279

Significant advantages of the L820 (vs the L810)

  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs 720p @ 30fps
  • Has a CMOS-family sensor: CMOS vs CCD
  • Has in-camera HDR

Significant disadvantages of the L820 (vs the L810)

  • None found

common strengths of the L820 and L810

  • High resolution screens: 921k dots vs 921k dots
  • Fairly small: Prosumer size 111x76x85 mm vs Prosumer size 111x76x83 mm
  • Both can take 3D photos, many cameras like these don't
arrow Compare the Coolpix L820 vs the Coolpix L810

Nikon Coolpix L830

Nikon Coolpix L830
1 year newer
$227

Significant advantages of the L830 (vs the L810)

  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs 720p @ 30fps
  • Has a flip-out screen
  • Has a CMOS-family sensor: CMOS vs CCD

Significant disadvantages of the L830 (vs the L810)

  • Doesn't take 3D photos

common strengths of the L830 and L810

  • High resolution screens: 921k dots vs 921k dots
  • Fairly small: Prosumer size 111x75x91 mm vs Prosumer size 111x76x83 mm
arrow Compare the Coolpix L830 vs the Coolpix L810

Nikon Coolpix L120

Nikon Coolpix L120
1 year older

Significant advantages of the L120 (vs the L810)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the L120 (vs the L810)

  • Doesn't take 3D photos
  • Lacks in-camera panoramic stitching

common strengths of the L120 and L810

  • High resolution screens: 920k dots vs 921k dots
  • Fairly small: Prosumer size 110x77x78 mm vs Prosumer size 111x76x83 mm
  • Light weight: 406 g vs 430 g
arrow Compare the Coolpix L120 vs the Coolpix L810

Panasonic Lumix DMC-LZ20

Panasonic Lumix DMC-LZ20
5 months newer
$131

Significant advantages of the DMC-LZ20 (vs the L810)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the DMC-LZ20 (vs the L810)

  • Doesn't take 3D photos
  • Significantly lower resolution screen: 460k dots vs 921k dots

common strengths of the DMC-LZ20 and L810

  • Fairly small: Prosumer size 120x76x80 mm vs Prosumer size 111x76x83 mm
  • Inexpensive: $131.23 vs $174.77
arrow Compare the Panasonic Lumix DMC-LZ20 vs the Nikon Coolpix L810

Nikon Coolpix L320

Nikon Coolpix L320
1 year newer
$172

Significant advantages of the L320 (vs the L810)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the L320 (vs the L810)

  • Much lower resolution screen: 230k dots vs 921k dots
  • Doesn't take 3D photos

common strengths of the L320 and L810

  • Fairly small: Prosumer size 111x76x83 mm vs Prosumer size 111x76x83 mm
  • Light weight: 430 g vs 430 g
  • Inexpensive: $172.18 vs $174.77
arrow Compare the Coolpix L320 vs the Coolpix L810

Fujifilm FinePix S4500

Fujifilm FinePix S4500
similar age
$152 - $300

Significant advantages of the S4500 (vs the L810)

  • Has a viewfinder: Digital vs None

Significant disadvantages of the S4500 (vs the L810)

  • Much lower resolution screen: 230k dots vs 921k dots
  • Doesn't take 3D photos
  • Lacks in-camera panoramic stitching

common strengths of the S4500 and L810

  • Inexpensive: $152.39 vs $174.77
arrow Compare the Fujifilm FinePix S4500 vs the Nikon Coolpix L810

compared toEntry-level DSLR competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Nikon L810 compared to entry-level DSLR competitors include: it has a significantly higher resolution screen (921k dots vs 230k dots), has image stabilization (lens vs none), creates panoramas in-camera, captures 3D images and is newer (february, 2012 vs february, 2011).

However, on average it records lower quality movies (720p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 24fps), takes significantly lower resolution photos (9.7 MP vs 17.9 MP), doesn't record movies in 24p, doesn't shoot as fast continuously (1.2 fps vs 3.7 fps) and doesn't have a screen which flips out.

Canon Rebel T3

Canon Rebel T3
1 year older
$290 - $329 (body only)
$369 - $449 18-55mm lens

Significant advantages of the T3 (vs the L810)

  • Much larger sensor: APS-C 22.2x14.7mm vs 1/2.3" 6.2x4.6mm
  • Has a viewfinder: Pentamirror vs None
  • Faster autofocus: Phase detection vs Contrast detection

Significant disadvantages of the T3 (vs the L810)

  • Much lower resolution screen: 230k dots vs 921k dots
  • Significantly smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.0"
  • No image stabilization: None vs Lens

common strengths of the T3 and L810

  • Inexpensive: $289.95 vs $174.77
  • Light weight: 459 g vs 430 g
arrow Compare the Canon Rebel T3 vs the Nikon Coolpix L810

Nikon D3100

Nikon D3100
1 year older
$278 (body only)
$392 - $427 18-55mm lens

Significant advantages of the D3100 (vs the L810)

  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 24fps vs 720p @ 30fps
  • Much larger sensor: APS-C 23.1x15.4mm vs 1/2.3" 6.2x4.6mm
  • Has a viewfinder: Pentamirror vs None

Significant disadvantages of the D3100 (vs the L810)

  • Much lower resolution screen: 230k dots vs 921k dots
  • No image stabilization: None vs Lens
  • Doesn't take 3D photos

common strengths of the D3100 and L810

  • Fairly small: Prosumer size 124x96x73 mm vs Prosumer size 111x76x83 mm
  • Inexpensive: $278.29 vs $174.77
  • Light weight: 505 g vs 430 g
arrow Compare the D3100 vs the Coolpix L810

Nikon D3200

Nikon D3200
similar age
$319 - $567 (body only)
$477 18-55mm lens

Significant advantages of the D3200 (vs the L810)

  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs 720p @ 30fps
  • Much larger sensor: APS-C 23.2x15.4mm vs 1/2.3" 6.2x4.6mm
  • Has a viewfinder: Pentamirror vs None

Significant disadvantages of the D3200 (vs the L810)

  • No image stabilization: None vs Lens
  • Doesn't take 3D photos
  • Lacks in-camera panoramic stitching

common strengths of the D3200 and L810

  • Inexpensive: $319.00 vs $174.77
  • Light weight: 505 g vs 430 g
arrow Compare the D3200 vs the Coolpix L810

Canon Rebel T3i

Canon Rebel T3i
1 year older
$499 - $774 (body only)
$200 - $617 18-55mm lens

Significant advantages of the T3i (vs the L810)

  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs 720p @ 30fps
  • Much larger sensor: APS-C 22.3x14.9mm vs 1/2.3" 6.2x4.6mm
  • Has a viewfinder: Pentamirror vs None

Significant disadvantages of the T3i (vs the L810)

  • No image stabilization: None vs Lens
  • Doesn't take 3D photos
  • Lacks in-camera panoramic stitching

common strengths of the T3i and L810

  • Inexpensive: $199.95 vs $174.77
arrow Compare the Canon Rebel T3i vs the Nikon Coolpix L810

Nikon D5200

Nikon D5200
9 months newer
$597 (body only)
$579 - $697 18-55mm lens

Significant advantages of the D5200 (vs the L810)

  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 60fps vs 720p @ 30fps
  • Much larger sensor: APS-C 23.5x15.6mm vs 1/2.3" 6.2x4.6mm
  • Has a viewfinder: Pentamirror vs None

Significant disadvantages of the D5200 (vs the L810)

  • No image stabilization: None vs Lens
  • Doesn't take 3D photos
  • Lacks in-camera panoramic stitching

common strengths of the D5200 and L810

  • None found
arrow Compare the D5200 vs the Coolpix L810

Nikon D3000

Nikon D3000
2 years older
$330 (body only)
$398 - $407 18-55mm lens

Significant advantages of the D3000 (vs the L810)

  • Much larger sensor: APS-C 23.6x15.8mm vs 1/2.3" 6.2x4.6mm
  • Has a viewfinder: Pentamirror vs None
  • Much less shutter lag: 262 ms vs 580 ms

Significant disadvantages of the D3000 (vs the L810)

  • Does not take movies: None vs 720p @ 30fps
  • Much lower resolution screen: 230k dots vs 921k dots
  • No image stabilization: None vs Lens

common strengths of the D3000 and L810

  • Very small: Prosumer size 126x97x64 mm vs Prosumer size 111x76x83 mm
  • Inexpensive: $329.99 vs $174.77
arrow Compare the D3000 vs the Coolpix L810

compared toPro DSLR competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Nikon L810 compared to pro DSLR competitors include: it has image stabilization (lens vs none), creates panoramas in-camera, captures 3D images, is newer (february, 2012 vs august, 2010) and is significantly smaller (prosumer size 111x76x83 mm vs professional size 152x116x76 mm).

However, on average it records lower quality movies (720p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps), has a slightly smaller screen (3.0" vs 3.2"), has a slightly lower resolution screen (921k dots vs 1,040k dots), takes significantly lower resolution photos (9.7 MP vs 22.3 MP) and slightly lower maximum light sensitivity (1,600 ISO vs 25,600 ISO).

Canon EOS 5D Mark III

Canon EOS 5D Mark III
similar age
$3,399 (body only)
$3,990 - $3,999 24-105mm lens

Significant advantages of the 5D Mark III (vs the L810)

  • Has a viewfinder: Pentaprism vs None
  • Much less shutter lag: 120 ms vs 580 ms
  • Faster autofocus: Phase detection vs Contrast detection

Significant disadvantages of the 5D Mark III (vs the L810)

  • No image stabilization: None vs Lens
  • Doesn't take 3D photos
  • Lacks in-camera panoramic stitching

common strengths of the 5D Mark III and L810

  • Inexpensive: $249.95 vs $174.77
arrow Compare the Canon EOS 5D Mark III vs the Nikon Coolpix L810

Canon EOS 60D

Canon EOS 60D
1 year older
$699 - $871 (body only)
$450 - $1,182 18-135mm lens

Significant advantages of the 60D (vs the L810)

  • Has a viewfinder: Pentaprism vs None
  • Faster autofocus: Phase detection vs Contrast detection
  • Much less shutter lag: 253 ms vs 580 ms

Significant disadvantages of the 60D (vs the L810)

  • No image stabilization: None vs Lens
  • Doesn't take 3D photos
  • Lacks in-camera panoramic stitching

common strengths of the 60D and L810

  • Fairly small: Professional size 145x106x79 mm vs Prosumer size 111x76x83 mm
  • Light weight: 755 g vs 430 g
  • Inexpensive: $199.95 vs $174.77
arrow Compare the Canon EOS 60D vs the Nikon Coolpix L810

compared toTravel zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Nikon L810 compared to travel zoom competitors include: it has a slightly wider wide angle lens (23 mm vs 28 mm), has a slightly wider aperture (f/3.1 vs f/3.5), has a significantly higher resolution screen (921k dots vs 230k dots), creates panoramas in-camera and captures 3D images.

However, on average it doesn't have a built-in GPS, records lower quality movies (720p @ 30fps vs 1080p), is slightly larger (prosumer size 111x76x83 mm vs mid size 108x69x34 mm), doesn't record movies in 24p and has a CCD-family sensor (CCD vs CMOS).

Canon PowerShot SX160 IS

Canon PowerShot SX160 IS
6 months newer
$170 - $250

Significant advantages of the SX160 IS (vs the L810)

  • Significantly thinner: 1.7" vs 3.3"

Significant disadvantages of the SX160 IS (vs the L810)

  • Significantly worse wide angle: 28 mm vs 23 mm
  • Much lower resolution screen: 230k dots vs 921k dots
  • Doesn't take 3D photos

common strengths of the SX160 IS and L810

  • Good macro capabilities: 1 cm vs 1 cm
arrow Compare the Canon PowerShot SX160 IS vs the Nikon Coolpix L810

Nikon Coolpix L610

Nikon Coolpix L610
6 months newer
$167

Significant advantages of the L610 (vs the L810)

  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p vs 720p @ 30fps
  • Has a CMOS-family sensor: CMOS vs CCD
  • Smaller: Mid size 108x69x34 mm vs Prosumer size 111x76x83 mm

Significant disadvantages of the L610 (vs the L810)

  • Significantly lower resolution screen: 460k dots vs 921k dots
  • Significantly shorter battery life: 120 shots vs 300 shots

common strengths of the L610 and L810

  • Both can take 3D photos, many cameras like these don't
  • In-camera panoramas
  • Good macro capabilities: 1 cm vs 1 cm
arrow Compare the Coolpix L610 vs the Coolpix L810

Canon PowerShot SX170 IS

Canon PowerShot SX170 IS
1 year newer
$149 - $150

Significant advantages of the SX170 IS (vs the L810)

  • Significantly thinner: 1.7" vs 3.3"
  • Lighter: 251 g vs 430 g

Significant disadvantages of the SX170 IS (vs the L810)

  • Significantly worse wide angle: 28 mm vs 23 mm
  • Much lower resolution screen: 230k dots vs 921k dots
  • Doesn't take 3D photos

common strengths of the SX170 IS and L810

  • Good macro capabilities: 1 cm vs 1 cm
arrow Compare the Canon PowerShot SX170 IS vs the Nikon Coolpix L810

Canon PowerShot SX260 HS

Canon PowerShot SX260 HS
similar age
$235 - $300

Significant advantages of the SX260 HS (vs the L810)

  • Has a GPS
  • Supports 24p
  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 24fps vs 720p @ 30fps

Significant disadvantages of the SX260 HS (vs the L810)

  • Doesn't take 3D photos
  • Significantly lower resolution screen: 461k dots vs 921k dots
  • Significantly worse macro capability: 5 cm vs 1 cm

common strengths of the SX260 HS and L810

  • In-camera panoramas
arrow Compare the Canon PowerShot SX260 HS vs the Nikon Coolpix L810