As well as being compared against other super zooms, the Nikon Coolpix L810 is also often compared to entry-level DSLRs and travel zooms. The Nikon Coolpix L810's top rivals come from Nikon (such as the Coolpix L820 and the Coolpix L830) and Canon (such as the PowerShot SX510 HS and the PowerShot SX500 IS)

compared toSuper zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Nikon L810 compared to other super zoom competitors include: it has a slightly higher resolution screen (921k dots vs 461k dots), creates panoramas in-camera and captures 3D images.

However, on average it records lower quality movies (720p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 24fps), doesn't record high-speed movies (none vs 240 fps), doesn't record movies in 24p, has a CCD-family sensor (CCD vs CMOS) and lacks a built in HDR feature.

Nikon Coolpix L820

Nikon Coolpix L820
1 year newer
$168 - $279

Significant advantages of the L820 (vs the L810)

  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs 720p @ 30fps
  • Has a CMOS-family sensor: CMOS vs CCD
  • Has in-camera HDR

Significant disadvantages of the L820 (vs the L810)

  • None found

common strengths of the L820 and L810

  • High resolution screens: 921k dots vs 921k dots
  • Fairly small: Prosumer size 111x76x85 mm vs Prosumer size 111x76x83 mm
  • Both can take 3D photos, many cameras like these don't
arrow Compare the Coolpix L820 vs the Coolpix L810

Nikon Coolpix L830

Nikon Coolpix L830
1 year newer
$197

Significant advantages of the L830 (vs the L810)

  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs 720p @ 30fps
  • Has a flip-out screen
  • Has a CMOS-family sensor: CMOS vs CCD

Significant disadvantages of the L830 (vs the L810)

  • Doesn't take 3D photos

common strengths of the L830 and L810

  • High resolution screens: 921k dots vs 921k dots
  • Fairly small: Prosumer size 111x75x91 mm vs Prosumer size 111x76x83 mm
  • Inexpensive: $196.95 vs $189.99
arrow Compare the Coolpix L830 vs the Coolpix L810

Nikon Coolpix L120

Nikon Coolpix L120
1 year older
$257

Significant advantages of the L120 (vs the L810)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the L120 (vs the L810)

  • Doesn't take 3D photos
  • Lacks in-camera panoramic stitching

common strengths of the L120 and L810

  • High resolution screens: 920k dots vs 921k dots
  • Fairly small: Prosumer size 110x77x78 mm vs Prosumer size 111x76x83 mm
  • Light weight: 406 g vs 430 g
arrow Compare the Coolpix L120 vs the Coolpix L810

Nikon Coolpix P510

Nikon Coolpix P510
similar age
$313

Significant advantages of the P510 (vs the L810)

  • More zoom: 41.7x vs 25.4x
  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs 720p @ 30fps
  • Has a CMOS-family sensor: CMOS vs CCD

Significant disadvantages of the P510 (vs the L810)

  • Shorter battery life: 200 shots vs 300 shots

common strengths of the P510 and L810

  • High resolution screens: 921k dots vs 921k dots
  • Both can take 3D photos, many cameras like these don't
arrow Compare the P510 vs the L810

Canon PowerShot SX510 HS

Canon PowerShot SX510 HS
1 year newer
$199 - $250

Significant advantages of the SX510 HS (vs the L810)

  • Supports 24p
  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 24fps vs 720p @ 30fps
  • Has a CMOS-family sensor: CMOS vs CCD

Significant disadvantages of the SX510 HS (vs the L810)

  • Doesn't take 3D photos
  • Significantly lower resolution screen: 461k dots vs 921k dots
  • Lacks in-camera panoramic stitching

common strengths of the SX510 HS and L810

  • Fairly small: Standard size 104x70x80 mm vs Prosumer size 111x76x83 mm
  • Light weight: 349 g vs 430 g
  • Inexpensive: $199.00 vs $189.99
arrow Compare the Canon PowerShot SX510 HS vs the Nikon Coolpix L810

Nikon Coolpix L320

Nikon Coolpix L320
1 year newer
$212

Significant advantages of the L320 (vs the L810)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the L320 (vs the L810)

  • Much lower resolution screen: 230k dots vs 921k dots
  • Doesn't take 3D photos

common strengths of the L320 and L810

  • Fairly small: Prosumer size 111x76x83 mm vs Prosumer size 111x76x83 mm
  • Light weight: 430 g vs 430 g
  • Inexpensive: $212.22 vs $189.99
arrow Compare the Coolpix L320 vs the Coolpix L810

compared toEntry-level DSLR competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Nikon L810 compared to entry-level DSLR competitors include: it has a much larger screen (3.0" vs 2.5"), has a much higher resolution screen (921k dots vs 230k dots), has image stabilization (lens vs none), creates panoramas in-camera and captures 3D images.

However, on average it records lower quality movies (720p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 24fps), takes slightly lower resolution photos (9.7 MP vs 14.2 MP), doesn't record movies in 24p, doesn't shoot as fast continuously (1.2 fps vs 4 fps) and has a much smaller sensor (1/2.3" 6.2x4.6mm vs APS-C 23.1x15.4mm).

Nikon D3200

Nikon D3200
similar age
$319 (body only)
$389 - $506 18-55mm lens

Significant advantages of the D3200 (vs the L810)

  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs 720p @ 30fps
  • Much larger sensor: APS-C 23.2x15.4mm vs 1/2.3" 6.2x4.6mm
  • Has a viewfinder: Pentamirror vs None

Significant disadvantages of the D3200 (vs the L810)

  • No image stabilization: None vs Lens
  • Doesn't take 3D photos
  • Lacks in-camera panoramic stitching

common strengths of the D3200 and L810

  • Inexpensive: $319.00 vs $189.99
  • Light weight: 505 g vs 430 g
arrow Compare the D3200 vs the Coolpix L810

Canon EOS 30D

Canon EOS 30D
6 years older

Significant advantages of the 30D (vs the L810)

  • Much larger sensor: APS-C 22.5x15.0mm vs 1/2.3" 6.2x4.6mm
  • Has a viewfinder: Pentaprism vs None
  • Faster autofocus: Phase detection vs Contrast detection

Significant disadvantages of the 30D (vs the L810)

  • Does not take movies: None vs 720p @ 30fps
  • Much smaller screen: 2.5" vs 3.0"
  • Much lower resolution screen: 230k dots vs 921k dots

common strengths of the 30D and L810

  • None found
arrow Compare the Canon EOS 30D vs the Nikon Coolpix L810

Nikon D3100

Nikon D3100
1 year older
$285 (body only)
$427 18-55mm lens

Significant advantages of the D3100 (vs the L810)

  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 24fps vs 720p @ 30fps
  • Much larger sensor: APS-C 23.1x15.4mm vs 1/2.3" 6.2x4.6mm
  • Has a viewfinder: Pentamirror vs None

Significant disadvantages of the D3100 (vs the L810)

  • Much lower resolution screen: 230k dots vs 921k dots
  • No image stabilization: None vs Lens
  • Doesn't take 3D photos

common strengths of the D3100 and L810

  • Fairly small: Prosumer size 124x96x73 mm vs Prosumer size 111x76x83 mm
  • Inexpensive: $284.99 vs $189.99
  • Light weight: 505 g vs 430 g
arrow Compare the D3100 vs the Coolpix L810

Canon Rebel T3

Canon Rebel T3
1 year older
$225 - $389 (body only)
$399 - $550 18-55mm lens

Significant advantages of the T3 (vs the L810)

  • Much larger sensor: APS-C 22.2x14.7mm vs 1/2.3" 6.2x4.6mm
  • Has a viewfinder: Pentamirror vs None
  • Faster autofocus: Phase detection vs Contrast detection

Significant disadvantages of the T3 (vs the L810)

  • Much lower resolution screen: 230k dots vs 921k dots
  • Significantly smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.0"
  • No image stabilization: None vs Lens

common strengths of the T3 and L810

  • Very inexpensive: $224.95 vs $189.99
  • Light weight: 459 g vs 430 g
arrow Compare the Canon Rebel T3 vs the Nikon Coolpix L810

Canon EOS 20D

Canon EOS 20D
7 years older

Significant advantages of the 20D (vs the L810)

  • Much larger sensor: APS-C 22.5x15.0mm vs 1/2.3" 6.2x4.6mm
  • Has a viewfinder: Pentaprism vs None
  • Shoots RAW

Significant disadvantages of the 20D (vs the L810)

  • Does not take movies: None vs 720p @ 30fps
  • Much smaller screen: 1.8" vs 3.0"
  • Much lower resolution screen: 118k dots vs 921k dots

common strengths of the 20D and L810

  • None found
arrow Compare the Canon EOS 20D vs the Nikon Coolpix L810

compared toTravel zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Nikon L810 compared to travel zoom competitors include: it has a slightly wider wide angle lens (23 mm vs 28 mm), has a significantly higher resolution screen (921k dots vs 230k dots), creates panoramas in-camera, captures 3D images and has a slightly longer battery life (300 shots vs 210 shots).

However, on average it doesn't have a built-in GPS, records lower quality movies (720p @ 30fps vs 1080p), is slightly larger (prosumer size 111x76x83 mm vs mid size 108x69x34 mm), has a CCD-family sensor (CCD vs CMOS) and is older (february, 2012 vs january, 2013).

Canon PowerShot SX160 IS

Canon PowerShot SX160 IS
6 months newer
$140 - $248

Significant advantages of the SX160 IS (vs the L810)

  • Thinner: 1.7" vs 3.3"

Significant disadvantages of the SX160 IS (vs the L810)

  • Worse wide angle: 28 mm vs 23 mm
  • Much lower resolution screen: 230k dots vs 921k dots
  • Doesn't take 3D photos

common strengths of the SX160 IS and L810

  • Good macro capabilities: 1 cm vs 1 cm
arrow Compare the Canon PowerShot SX160 IS vs the Nikon Coolpix L810

Canon PowerShot SX150 IS

Canon PowerShot SX150 IS
5 months older
$130

Significant advantages of the SX150 IS (vs the L810)

  • Thinner: 1.8" vs 3.3"

Significant disadvantages of the SX150 IS (vs the L810)

  • Worse wide angle: 28 mm vs 23 mm
  • Much lower resolution screen: 230k dots vs 921k dots
  • Doesn't take 3D photos

common strengths of the SX150 IS and L810

  • Good macro capabilities: 1 cm vs 1 cm
arrow Compare the Canon PowerShot SX150 IS vs the Nikon Coolpix L810

Canon PowerShot SX280 HS

Canon PowerShot SX280 HS
1 year newer
$320

Significant advantages of the SX280 HS (vs the L810)

  • Has a GPS
  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 60fps vs 720p @ 30fps
  • Smaller: Compact 106x63x33 mm vs Prosumer size 111x76x83 mm

Significant disadvantages of the SX280 HS (vs the L810)

  • Doesn't take 3D photos
  • Significantly lower resolution screen: 461k dots vs 921k dots
  • Lacks in-camera panoramic stitching

common strengths of the SX280 HS and L810

  • None found
arrow Compare the Canon PowerShot SX280 HS vs the Nikon Coolpix L810

Canon PowerShot SX170 IS

Canon PowerShot SX170 IS
1 year newer
$149 - $180

Significant advantages of the SX170 IS (vs the L810)

  • Thinner: 1.7" vs 3.3"

Significant disadvantages of the SX170 IS (vs the L810)

  • Worse wide angle: 28 mm vs 23 mm
  • Much lower resolution screen: 230k dots vs 921k dots
  • Doesn't take 3D photos

common strengths of the SX170 IS and L810

  • Good macro capabilities: 1 cm vs 1 cm
arrow Compare the Canon PowerShot SX170 IS vs the Nikon Coolpix L810

Nikon Coolpix L610

Nikon Coolpix L610
6 months newer
$139

Significant advantages of the L610 (vs the L810)

  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p vs 720p @ 30fps
  • Has a CMOS-family sensor: CMOS vs CCD
  • Smaller: Mid size 108x69x34 mm vs Prosumer size 111x76x83 mm

Significant disadvantages of the L610 (vs the L810)

  • Significantly lower resolution screen: 460k dots vs 921k dots
  • Significantly shorter battery life: 120 shots vs 300 shots

common strengths of the L610 and L810

  • Both can take 3D photos, many cameras like these don't
  • Good macro capabilities: 1 cm vs 1 cm
  • In-camera panoramas
arrow Compare the Coolpix L610 vs the Coolpix L810

Nikon Coolpix S6500

Nikon Coolpix S6500
1 year newer
$100 - $220

Significant advantages of the S6500 (vs the L810)

  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs 720p @ 30fps
  • Significantly smaller: Compact 95x58x26 mm vs Prosumer size 111x76x83 mm
  • Has a CMOS-family sensor: CMOS vs CCD

Significant disadvantages of the S6500 (vs the L810)

  • Significantly lower resolution screen: 460k dots vs 921k dots
  • Significantly shorter battery life: 150 shots vs 300 shots

common strengths of the S6500 and L810

  • None found
arrow Compare the Coolpix S6500 vs the Coolpix L810