Generally, some of the advantages of the Nikon S3500 compared to super zoom competitors include: it is significantly smaller (super compact (97×58×21 mm) vs large (140×103×137 mm)), has better image stabilization (lens vs sensor shift), is newer (february 2013 vs february 2010), is thinner (0.8" vs 5.4") and is significantly lighter (129 g vs 899 g).
However, on average it has a slightly narrower aperture (f/3.4 vs f/2.8), has significantly less zoom (7x vs 83.3x), has a slightly smaller screen (2.7" vs 3"), has a significantly lower resolution screen (230k dots vs 921k dots) and slightly lower maximum light sensitivity (1,600 ISO vs 12,800 ISO).
Fujifilm FinePix S1600
3 years older
Significant advantages of the S1600 (vs the S3500)
- Has a viewfinder: Digital vs None
Significant disadvantages of the S1600 (vs the S3500)
- Worse image stabilization:
- Sensor shift
vs - Lens
- Significantly thicker: 3.2" vs 0.8"
common strengths of the S1600 and S3500
- Very small: Prosumer size (110×73×81 mm) vs Super compact (97×58×21 mm)
- Very light: 337 g vs 129 g
- Thin: 3.2" vs 0.8"
Nikon Coolpix P900
2 years newer
$458 - $597
Significant advantages of the P900 (vs the S3500)
- Much higher resolution screen: 921k dots vs 230k dots
- Significantly more zoom: 83.3x vs 7x
- Has a CMOS-family sensor: CMOS vs CCD
Significant disadvantages of the P900 (vs the S3500)
- Much larger: Large (140×103×137 mm) vs Super compact (97×58×21 mm)
- Much thicker: 5.4" vs 0.8"
- Much heavier: 899 g vs 129 g
common strengths of the P900 and S3500
- Inexpensive: $458.00 vs $195.59