As well as being compared against other compacts, the Nikon Coolpix S2700 is also often compared to super zooms and travel zooms. The Nikon Coolpix S2700's top rivals come from Canon (such as the PowerShot A2300 IS and the PowerShot A2200) and Nikon (such as the Coolpix A100 and the Coolpix S4300)
Generally, some of the advantages of the Nikon S2700 compared to other compact competitors include: it has a significantly wider wide angle lens (26 mm vs 37 mm), is slightly smaller (super compact (95×58×21 mm) vs compact (94×62×31 mm)) and is newer (january 2013 vs february 2012).
However, on average it has a slightly narrower aperture (f/3.5 vs f/3).
Generally, some of the advantages of the Nikon S2700 compared to super zoom competitors include: it is significantly smaller (super compact (95×58×21 mm) vs large (140×103×137 mm)), is newer (january 2013 vs february 2011), is thinner (0.8" vs 5.4"), is significantly lighter (125 g vs 899 g) and is slightly less expensive ($241.47 vs $545.98).
However, on average it has a slightly narrower aperture (f/3.5 vs f/3.1), has slightly less zoom (6x vs 83.3x), has a slightly narrower wide angle lens (26 mm vs 23 mm), has a much smaller screen (2.7" vs 3.2") and has a much lower resolution screen (230k dots vs 920k dots).
Generally, some of the advantages of the Nikon S2700 compared to travel zoom competitors include: it is much smaller (super compact (95×58×21 mm) vs compact (133×71×19 mm)), is newer (january 2013 vs january 2010), is thinner (0.8" vs 1.1"), is much lighter (125 g vs 283 g) and is much less expensive ($241.47 vs $1,639.09).
However, on average it has a slightly narrower wide angle lens (26 mm vs 23 mm), doesn't have a built-in GPS, has a much smaller screen (2.7" vs 4.8"), has a slightly lower resolution screen (230k dots vs 1,036k dots) and slightly lower maximum light sensitivity (1,600 ISO vs 3,200 ISO).
