Nikon Coolpix A100

5x, f/3.2, 26 mm
Retailer
    Style
      Color
        You save

        Summary Nikon Coolpix A100

        Prices Price
        Camera only
        $110
        all Coolpix A100 prices
        Score Snapsort rank
        Within its price range
        #n/a of 0
        Among similar cameras
        #n/a of 12
        Specifications Key specs
        Zoom
        Help 5x
        Screen size
        Help 2.7"
        Aperture
        Help f/3.2
        Screen resolution
        Help 230k dots
        Wide angle
        Help 26 mm
        Movie format
        Help 720p @ 30fps
        see all specifications

        Pros

        Report a correction

        The Nikon Coolpix A100 vs other recent compacts

        Built-in flash Built-in flash Help
        Usually standard
        Size Quite small Help
        Super compact (95×59×20 mm)
        Weight Light Help
        119 g
        Popularity Very popular Help
        Among snapsort users
        Zoom Above average zoom Help
        5x
        Thickness Thin Help
        0.8"
        Lowest price Inexpensive Help
        $99.60

        Cons

        Report a correction

        The Nikon Coolpix A100 vs other recent compacts

        Movie format HD movies Help
        720p @ 30fps
        Image stabilization Image stabilization Help
        1. Digital
        Touch screen No touch screen Help
        More buttons
        Sensor size Slightly smaller than average sensor Help
        1/2.3" 6.17x4.55mm
        Announced Old Help
        January 2016
        Screen resolution Low resolution screen Help
        230k dots
        Continuous shooting Slow continuous shooting Help
        1.1 fps
        True resolution Lower true resolution Help
        9.7 MP
        Sensor type Sensor type Help
        CCD
        Fastest shutter speed Slow shutter speed Help
        1/2000 of a second

        Appearance

        front photo of the Nikon Coolpix A100

        Discussion

        Nikon Coolpix A100
        Coolpix A100
        Nikon

        Report a correction

        Showing 0 comments