As well as being compared against other compacts, the Nikon Coolpix A10 is also often compared to travel zooms, ultra compacts, digicams and super zooms. The Nikon Coolpix A10's top rivals come from Nikon (such as the Coolpix L32 and the Coolpix S33) and Sony (such as the Cyber-shot DSC-W810 and the CyberShot DSC-W800)

compared toCompact competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Nikon Coolpix A10 compared to other compact competitors include: it is newer (january 2016 vs january 2014) and is significantly less expensive ($78.29 vs $2,808.03).

However, on average it has a slightly smaller screen (2.7" vs 3"), is slightly larger (compact (96×59×29 mm) vs super compact (95×59×20 mm)), doesn't have a screen which flips out, has a CCD-family sensor (CCD vs CMOS) and has a slightly shorter battery life (200 shots vs 250 shots).

Nikon Coolpix L32

Nikon Coolpix L32
1 year older
$199

Significant advantages of the L32 (vs the Coolpix A10)

  • Has a CMOS-family sensor: CMOS vs CCD
  • Much larger screen: 3" vs 2.7"
  • Much longer battery life: 320 shots vs 200 shots

Significant disadvantages of the L32 (vs the Coolpix A10)

  • None found

common strengths of the L32 and Coolpix A10

  • Very small: Compact (95×60×29 mm) vs Compact (96×59×29 mm)
  • Very light: 164 g vs 160 g
  • Thin: 1.1" vs 1.1"

Nikon Coolpix S33

Nikon Coolpix S33
1 year older
$150

Significant advantages of the S33 (vs the Coolpix A10)

  • Has a CMOS-family sensor: CMOS vs CCD
  • Waterproof

Significant disadvantages of the S33 (vs the Coolpix A10)

  • Much larger: Compact (110×66×27 mm) vs Compact (96×59×29 mm)
  • Significantly worse wide angle: 30 mm vs 26 mm
  • Significantly heavier: 221 g vs 160 g

common strengths of the S33 and Coolpix A10

  • Very small: Compact (110×66×27 mm) vs Compact (96×59×29 mm)
  • Thin: 1.1" vs 1.1"
  • Inexpensive: $149.98 vs $78.29

Nikon Coolpix A100

Nikon Coolpix A100
similar age
$100

Significant advantages of the Coolpix A100 (vs the Coolpix A10)

  • Much smaller: Super compact (95×59×20 mm) vs Compact (96×59×29 mm)
  • Significantly longer battery life: 250 shots vs 200 shots
  • Significantly thinner: 0.8" vs 1.1"

Significant disadvantages of the Coolpix A100 (vs the Coolpix A10)

  • None found

common strengths of the Coolpix A100 and Coolpix A10

  • Very small: Super compact (95×59×20 mm) vs Compact (96×59×29 mm)
  • Very light: 119 g vs 160 g
  • Thin: 0.8" vs 1.1"

Nikon Coolpix L26

Nikon Coolpix L26
4 years older
$2,808

Significant advantages of the L26 (vs the Coolpix A10)

  • Much larger screen: 3" vs 2.7"

Significant disadvantages of the L26 (vs the Coolpix A10)

  • None found

common strengths of the L26 and Coolpix A10

  • Very small: Compact (96×60×29 mm) vs Compact (96×59×29 mm)
  • Very light: 164 g vs 160 g
  • Thin: 1.1" vs 1.1"

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W810

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W810
2 years older
$100

Significant advantages of the DSC-W810 (vs the Coolpix A10)

  • Much smaller: Super compact (93×53×23 mm) vs Compact (96×59×29 mm)
  • Better image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs
    1. Digital
  • Significantly thinner: 0.9" vs 1.1"

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-W810 (vs the Coolpix A10)

  • Significantly slower max shutter speed: 1/1500 of a second vs 1/2000 of a second

common strengths of the DSC-W810 and Coolpix A10

  • Very small: Super compact (93×53×23 mm) vs Compact (96×59×29 mm)
  • Very light: 120 g vs 160 g
  • Thin: 0.9" vs 1.1"

Nikon Coolpix L31

Nikon Coolpix L31
1 year older
$140

Significant advantages of the L31 (vs the Coolpix A10)

  • Has a CMOS-family sensor: CMOS vs CCD
  • Has a flip-out screen

Significant disadvantages of the L31 (vs the Coolpix A10)

  • None found

common strengths of the L31 and Coolpix A10

  • Very small: Compact (96×59×29 mm) vs Compact (96×59×29 mm)
  • Very light: 160 g vs 160 g
  • Thin: 1.1" vs 1.1"

compared toTravel zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Nikon Coolpix A10 compared to travel zoom competitors include: it is newer (january 2016 vs january 2015).

However, on average it is much larger (compact (96×59×29 mm) vs super compact (95×54×22 mm)), has worse image stabilization (digital vs lens), is thicker (1.1" vs 0.8"), is slightly heavier (160 g vs 127 g) and slightly shorter exposures (4 seconds vs 15 seconds).

Canon PowerShot ELPH 180

Canon PowerShot ELPH 180
similar age
$118 - $119

Significant advantages of the PowerShot ELPH 180 (vs the Coolpix A10)

  • Much smaller: Super compact (95×54×22 mm) vs Compact (96×59×29 mm)
  • Better image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs
    1. Digital
  • Significantly thinner: 0.9" vs 1.1"

Significant disadvantages of the PowerShot ELPH 180 (vs the Coolpix A10)

  • None found

common strengths of the PowerShot ELPH 180 and Coolpix A10

  • Very small: Super compact (95×54×22 mm) vs Compact (96×59×29 mm)
  • Very light: 126 g vs 160 g
  • Very thin: 0.9" vs 1.1"

Nikon Coolpix S3700

Nikon Coolpix S3700
1 year older
$200

Significant advantages of the S3700 (vs the Coolpix A10)

  • Much smaller: Super compact (96×58×20 mm) vs Compact (96×59×29 mm)
  • Better image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs
    1. Digital
  • Longer battery life: 240 shots vs 200 shots

Significant disadvantages of the S3700 (vs the Coolpix A10)

  • Significantly slower max shutter speed: 1/1500 of a second vs 1/2000 of a second

common strengths of the S3700 and Coolpix A10

  • Very small: Super compact (96×58×20 mm) vs Compact (96×59×29 mm)
  • Very light: 118 g vs 160 g
  • Very thin: 0.8" vs 1.1"

Nikon Coolpix S3600

Nikon Coolpix S3600
2 years older
$186

Significant advantages of the S3600 (vs the Coolpix A10)

  • Much smaller: Super compact (97×58×20 mm) vs Compact (96×59×29 mm)
  • Better image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs
    1. Digital
  • Significantly thinner: 0.8" vs 1.1"

Significant disadvantages of the S3600 (vs the Coolpix A10)

  • Significantly slower max shutter speed: 1/1500 of a second vs 1/2000 of a second

common strengths of the S3600 and Coolpix A10

  • Very small: Super compact (97×58×20 mm) vs Compact (96×59×29 mm)
  • Very light: 125 g vs 160 g
  • Very thin: 0.8" vs 1.1"

Canon PowerShot ELPH 170 IS

Canon PowerShot ELPH 170 IS
1 year older
$158

Significant advantages of the ELPH 170 IS (vs the Coolpix A10)

  • Much smaller: Compact (100×58×23 mm) vs Compact (96×59×29 mm)
  • Better image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs
    1. Digital
  • Thinner: 0.9" vs 1.1"

Significant disadvantages of the ELPH 170 IS (vs the Coolpix A10)

  • None found

common strengths of the ELPH 170 IS and Coolpix A10

  • Very small: Compact (100×58×23 mm) vs Compact (96×59×29 mm)
  • Very light: 141 g vs 160 g
  • Very thin: 0.9" vs 1.1"

Canon PowerShot ELPH 190 IS

Canon PowerShot ELPH 190 IS
similar age
$149 - $169

Significant advantages of the PowerShot ELPH 190 IS (vs the Coolpix A10)

  • Much smaller: Compact (95×57×24 mm) vs Compact (96×59×29 mm)
  • Better image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs
    1. Digital

Significant disadvantages of the PowerShot ELPH 190 IS (vs the Coolpix A10)

  • None found

common strengths of the PowerShot ELPH 190 IS and Coolpix A10

  • Very small: Compact (95×57×24 mm) vs Compact (96×59×29 mm)
  • Very light: 138 g vs 160 g
  • Very thin: 0.9" vs 1.1"

Canon PowerShot ELPH 160

Canon PowerShot ELPH 160
1 year older
$134

Significant advantages of the ELPH 160 (vs the Coolpix A10)

  • Much smaller: Super compact (95×54×22 mm) vs Compact (96×59×29 mm)
  • Significantly thinner: 0.9" vs 1.1"

Significant disadvantages of the ELPH 160 (vs the Coolpix A10)

  • None found

common strengths of the ELPH 160 and Coolpix A10

  • Very small: Super compact (95×54×22 mm) vs Compact (96×59×29 mm)
  • Very light: 127 g vs 160 g
  • Very thin: 0.9" vs 1.1"

compared toUltra compact competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Nikon Coolpix A10 compared to ultra compact competitors include: it is newer (january 2016 vs january 2013) and has a faster max shutter speed (1/2000 of a second vs 1/1500 of a second).

However, on average it has a slightly narrower wide angle lens (26 mm vs 24 mm), is much larger (compact (96×59×29 mm) vs ultra compact (50×22×54 mm)), has worse image stabilization (digital vs lens), has a significantly shorter battery life (200 shots vs 290 shots) and is slightly heavier (160 g vs 103 g).

Sony CyberShot DSC-W800

Sony CyberShot DSC-W800
1 year older
$80 - $105

Significant advantages of the DSC-W800 (vs the Coolpix A10)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-W800 (vs the Coolpix A10)

  • None found

common strengths of the DSC-W800 and Coolpix A10

  • None found

Panasonic Lumix DMC-XS1

Panasonic Lumix DMC-XS1
3 years older
$117

Significant advantages of the DMC-XS1 (vs the Coolpix A10)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the DMC-XS1 (vs the Coolpix A10)

  • None found

common strengths of the DMC-XS1 and Coolpix A10

  • None found

Panasonic Lumix FH10

Panasonic Lumix FH10
3 years older
$160

Significant advantages of the FH10 (vs the Coolpix A10)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the FH10 (vs the Coolpix A10)

  • None found

common strengths of the FH10 and Coolpix A10

  • None found

compared toDigicam competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Nikon Coolpix A10 compared to digicam competitors include: it has a slightly wider wide angle lens (26 mm vs 30 mm) and is newer (january 2016 vs january 2013).

However, on average it has a significantly smaller screen (2.7" vs 3"), has worse image stabilization (digital vs lens), has a CCD-family sensor (CCD vs CMOS) and has a slower max shutter speed (1/2000 of a second vs 1/4000 of a second).

Nikon Coolpix W100

Nikon Coolpix W100
6 months newer
$99 - $157

Significant advantages of the Coolpix W100 (vs the Coolpix A10)

  • Has a CMOS-family sensor: CMOS vs CCD

Significant disadvantages of the Coolpix W100 (vs the Coolpix A10)

  • Significantly worse wide angle: 30 mm vs 26 mm

common strengths of the Coolpix W100 and Coolpix A10

  • Light weight: 177 g vs 160 g
  • Very inexpensive: $99.00 vs $78.29

Nikon Coolpix S5200

Nikon Coolpix S5200
3 years older

Significant advantages of the S5200 (vs the Coolpix A10)

  • Much larger screen: 3" vs 2.7"
  • Has a CMOS-family sensor: CMOS vs CCD
  • Better image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs
    1. Digital

Significant disadvantages of the S5200 (vs the Coolpix A10)

  • None found

common strengths of the S5200 and Coolpix A10

  • Light weight: 146 g vs 160 g

compared toSuper zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Nikon Coolpix A10 compared to super zoom competitors include: it has a slightly wider aperture (f/3.2 vs f/3.5), has a much wider wide angle lens (26 mm vs 38 mm), is slightly smaller (compact (96×59×29 mm) vs prosumer size (106×76×81 mm)), has better image stabilization (digital vs none) and is newer (january 2016 vs february 2007).

However, on average it has a slightly smaller screen (2.7" vs 3") and doesn't have a viewfinder (none vs digital).

Canon PowerShot SX400 IS

Canon PowerShot SX400 IS
1 year older
$180

Significant advantages of the SX400 IS (vs the Coolpix A10)

  • Much larger screen: 3" vs 2.7"
  • Better image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs
    1. Digital

Significant disadvantages of the SX400 IS (vs the Coolpix A10)

  • Thicker: 3.1" vs 1.1"

common strengths of the SX400 IS and Coolpix A10

  • Very small: Standard size (104×69×80 mm) vs Compact (96×59×29 mm)
  • Very light: 313 g vs 160 g
  • Thin: 3.1" vs 1.1"

Fujifilm FinePix S5700 Zoom

Fujifilm FinePix S5700 Zoom
9 years older

Significant advantages of the S5700 Zoom (vs the Coolpix A10)

  • Has a viewfinder: Digital vs None

Significant disadvantages of the S5700 Zoom (vs the Coolpix A10)

  • Much worse wide angle: 38 mm vs 26 mm
  • No image stabilization: None vs
    1. Digital
  • Much smaller screen: 2.5" vs 2.7"

common strengths of the S5700 Zoom and Coolpix A10

  • Fairly small: Prosumer size (106×76×81 mm) vs Compact (96×59×29 mm)
  • Very light: 406 g vs 160 g
  • Thin: 3.2" vs 1.1"