Generally, some of the advantages of the Leica D-LUX 4 compared to boutique competitors include: it has a significantly wider aperture (f/2.0 vs f/2.8), has a significantly wider wide angle lens (24 mm vs 35 mm), has a slightly larger screen (3.0" vs 2.8"), is much smaller (compact 109x56x27 mm vs standard size 127x75x54 mm) and has better image stabilization (lens vs none).
However, on average it slightly lower maximum light sensitivity (3,200 ISO vs 12,800 ISO), doesn't shoot as fast continuously (2.5 fps vs 5 fps), doesn't have a screen which flips out, has a much smaller sensor (1/1.7" 7.9x5.8mm vs APS-C 23.6x15.8mm) and lacks a built in HDR feature.
Fujifilm FinePix X100
2 years newer
$1,199
|
Significant advantages of the X100 (vs the D-LUX 4)
- Much larger sensor: APS-C 23.6x15.8mm vs 1/1.7" 7.9x5.8mm
- Shoots significantly faster: 5 fps vs 2.5 fps
- Has a CMOS-family sensor: CMOS vs CCD
Significant disadvantages of the X100 (vs the D-LUX 4)
- Much larger: Standard size 127x75x54 mm vs Compact 109x56x27 mm
- Much worse wide angle: 35 mm vs 24 mm
- No image stabilization: None vs Lens
common strengths of the X100 and D-LUX 4
- Wide aperture: f/2.0 vs f/2.0
|
|
|
|
Leica X1
1 year newer
$2,242
|
Significant advantages of the X1 (vs the D-LUX 4)
- Much larger sensor: APS-C 23.6x15.8mm vs 1/1.7" 7.9x5.8mm
- Has a CMOS-family sensor: CMOS vs CCD
Significant disadvantages of the X1 (vs the D-LUX 4)
- Much narrower aperture: f/2.8 vs f/2.0
- Much worse wide angle: 36 mm vs 24 mm
- Significantly smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.0"
common strengths of the X1 and D-LUX 4
- Very small: Compact 124x60x32 mm vs Compact 109x56x27 mm
- Very thin: 1.3" vs 1.1"
- Light weight: 306 g vs 248 g
|
|
|
|
Canon PowerShot G1X
3 years newer
$799 - $800
|
Significant advantages of the G1X (vs the D-LUX 4)
- Much larger sensor: Four thirds 18.7x14.0mm vs 1/1.7" 7.9x5.8mm
- More zoom: 4x vs 2.5x
- Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 24fps vs 720p @ 24fps
Significant disadvantages of the G1X (vs the D-LUX 4)
- Much larger: Standard size 117x81x65 mm vs Compact 109x56x27 mm
- Much narrower aperture: f/2.8 vs f/2.0
- Much thicker: 2.6" vs 1.1"
common strengths of the G1X and D-LUX 4
- Larger than average screens: 3.0" vs 3.0"
- Good image stabilization: Lens vs Lens
- 24p support
|
|
|
|