As well as being compared against other pro digicams, the Leica D-LUX 4 is also often compared to boutiques, mirrorless, entry-level DSLRs, travel zooms and super zooms. The Leica D-LUX 4's top rivals come from Leica (such as the D-LUX 5 and the D-LUX 3) and Panasonic (such as the Lumix DMC-LX5 and the Lumix DMC-LX3)

compared toPro digicam competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Leica D-LUX 4 compared to other pro digicam competitors include: it has a slightly wider wide angle lens (24 mm vs 28 mm), records movies in 24p, supports an external flash and slightly longer exposures (60 seconds vs 30 seconds).

However, on average it has a marginally smaller sensor (1/1.7" 7.9x5.8mm vs 1/1.7" 8.3x6.2mm), records lower quality movies (720p @ 24fps vs 1080p @ 24fps), takes significantly lower resolution photos (10 MP vs 12 MP), doesn't shoot as fast continuously (2.5 fps vs 6 fps) and has a CCD-family sensor (CCD vs CMOS).

Leica D-LUX 5

Leica D-LUX 5
2 years newer
$798

Significant advantages of the D-LUX 5 (vs the D-LUX 4)

  • Significantly larger sensor: 1/1.7" 8.3x6.2mm vs 1/1.7" 7.9x5.8mm
  • Has boost ISO: 12,800 ISO vs None
  • Significantly faster max shutter speed: 1/4000 of a second vs 1/2000 of a second

Significant disadvantages of the D-LUX 5 (vs the D-LUX 4)

  • No 24p support

common strengths of the D-LUX 5 and D-LUX 4

  • Large sensors: 1/1.7" 8.3x6.2mm vs 1/1.7" 7.9x5.8mm
  • Supports RAW
  • Good wide angle: 24 mm vs 24 mm
arrow Compare the D-LUX 5 vs the D-LUX 4

Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX5

Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX5
1 year newer
$350

Significant advantages of the DMC-LX5 (vs the D-LUX 4)

  • Significantly larger sensor: 1/1.7" 8.3x6.2mm vs 1/1.7" 7.9x5.8mm
  • Has boost ISO: 12,800 ISO vs None
  • Significantly faster max shutter speed: 1/4000 of a second vs 1/2000 of a second

Significant disadvantages of the DMC-LX5 (vs the D-LUX 4)

  • No 24p support

common strengths of the DMC-LX5 and D-LUX 4

  • Large sensors: 1/1.7" 8.3x6.2mm vs 1/1.7" 7.9x5.8mm
  • Supports RAW
  • Good wide angle: 24 mm vs 24 mm
arrow Compare the Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX5 vs the Leica D-LUX 4

Canon Powershot S100

Canon Powershot S100
3 years newer
$372 - $430

Significant advantages of the S100 (vs the D-LUX 4)

  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 24fps vs 720p @ 24fps
  • Much higher true resolution: 12 MP vs 10 MP
  • Records high-speed movies: 240 fps vs None

Significant disadvantages of the S100 (vs the D-LUX 4)

  • Significantly smaller sensor: 1/1.8" 7.5x5.5mm vs 1/1.7" 7.9x5.8mm
  • No external flash support
  • Much shorter max exposures: 15 seconds vs 60 seconds

common strengths of the S100 and D-LUX 4

  • Supports RAW
  • Good wide angle: 24 mm vs 24 mm
  • Fairly small: Compact 99x60x28 mm vs Compact 109x56x27 mm
arrow Compare the Canon Powershot S100 vs the Leica D-LUX 4

Leica D-LUX 3

Leica D-LUX 3
2 years older
$836

Significant advantages of the D-LUX 3 (vs the D-LUX 4)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the D-LUX 3 (vs the D-LUX 4)

  • Significantly narrower aperture: f/2.8 vs f/2.0
  • Significantly smaller sensor: 1/1.8" 8.5x4.8mm vs 1/1.7" 7.9x5.8mm
  • No 24p support

common strengths of the D-LUX 3 and D-LUX 4

  • Supports RAW
  • Fairly small: Compact 106x56x26 mm vs Compact 109x56x27 mm
  • Thin: 1" vs 1.1"
arrow Compare the D-LUX 3 vs the D-LUX 4

Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX3

Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX3
similar age
$575

Significant advantages of the DMC-LX3 (vs the D-LUX 4)

  • Significantly larger sensor: 1/1.7" 8.3x6.2mm vs 1/1.7" 7.9x5.8mm
  • Has boost ISO: 6,400 ISO vs None

Significant disadvantages of the DMC-LX3 (vs the D-LUX 4)

  • None found

common strengths of the DMC-LX3 and D-LUX 4

  • Large sensors: 1/1.7" 8.3x6.2mm vs 1/1.7" 7.9x5.8mm
  • Supports RAW
  • Good wide angle: 24 mm vs 24 mm
arrow Compare the Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX3 vs the Leica D-LUX 4

Fujifilm Finepix X10

Fujifilm Finepix X10
3 years newer
$599

Significant advantages of the X10 (vs the D-LUX 4)

  • Much larger sensor: 1/1.7" 8.8x6.6mm vs 1/1.7" 7.9x5.8mm
  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs 720p @ 24fps
  • Much higher true resolution: 12 MP vs 10 MP

Significant disadvantages of the X10 (vs the D-LUX 4)

  • No 24p support
  • Significantly worse wide angle: 28 mm vs 24 mm
  • Smaller screen: 2.8" vs 3.0"

common strengths of the X10 and D-LUX 4

  • Large sensors: 1/1.7" 8.8x6.6mm vs 1/1.7" 7.9x5.8mm
  • Supports RAW
  • Support external flash
arrow Compare the Fujifilm Finepix X10 vs the Leica D-LUX 4

compared toBoutique competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Leica D-LUX 4 compared to boutique competitors include: it has a significantly wider aperture (f/2.0 vs f/2.8), has a significantly wider wide angle lens (24 mm vs 35 mm), has a slightly larger screen (3.0" vs 2.8"), is much smaller (compact 109x56x27 mm vs standard size 127x75x54 mm) and has better image stabilization (lens vs none).

However, on average it slightly lower maximum light sensitivity (3,200 ISO vs 12,800 ISO), doesn't shoot as fast continuously (2.5 fps vs 5 fps), doesn't have a screen which flips out, has a much smaller sensor (1/1.7" 7.9x5.8mm vs APS-C 23.6x15.8mm) and lacks a built in HDR feature.

Fujifilm FinePix X100

Fujifilm FinePix X100
2 years newer
$1,199

Significant advantages of the X100 (vs the D-LUX 4)

  • Much larger sensor: APS-C 23.6x15.8mm vs 1/1.7" 7.9x5.8mm
  • Shoots significantly faster: 5 fps vs 2.5 fps
  • Has a CMOS-family sensor: CMOS vs CCD

Significant disadvantages of the X100 (vs the D-LUX 4)

  • Much larger: Standard size 127x75x54 mm vs Compact 109x56x27 mm
  • Much worse wide angle: 35 mm vs 24 mm
  • No image stabilization: None vs Lens

common strengths of the X100 and D-LUX 4

  • Wide aperture: f/2.0 vs f/2.0
arrow Compare the Fujifilm FinePix X100 vs the Leica D-LUX 4

Leica X1

Leica X1
1 year newer
$2,242

Significant advantages of the X1 (vs the D-LUX 4)

  • Much larger sensor: APS-C 23.6x15.8mm vs 1/1.7" 7.9x5.8mm
  • Has a CMOS-family sensor: CMOS vs CCD

Significant disadvantages of the X1 (vs the D-LUX 4)

  • Much narrower aperture: f/2.8 vs f/2.0
  • Much worse wide angle: 36 mm vs 24 mm
  • Significantly smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.0"

common strengths of the X1 and D-LUX 4

  • Very small: Compact 124x60x32 mm vs Compact 109x56x27 mm
  • Very thin: 1.3" vs 1.1"
  • Light weight: 306 g vs 248 g
arrow Compare the X1 vs the D-LUX 4

Canon PowerShot G1X

Canon PowerShot G1X
3 years newer
$799 - $800

Significant advantages of the G1X (vs the D-LUX 4)

  • Much larger sensor: Four thirds 18.7x14.0mm vs 1/1.7" 7.9x5.8mm
  • More zoom: 4x vs 2.5x
  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 24fps vs 720p @ 24fps

Significant disadvantages of the G1X (vs the D-LUX 4)

  • Much larger: Standard size 117x81x65 mm vs Compact 109x56x27 mm
  • Much narrower aperture: f/2.8 vs f/2.0
  • Much thicker: 2.6" vs 1.1"

common strengths of the G1X and D-LUX 4

  • Larger than average screens: 3.0" vs 3.0"
  • Good image stabilization: Lens vs Lens
  • 24p support
arrow Compare the Canon PowerShot G1X vs the Leica D-LUX 4

compared toMirrorless interchangeable-lens competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Leica D-LUX 4 compared to mirrorless interchangeable-lens competitors include: it has better image stabilization (lens vs none), records movies in 24p, is slightly smaller (compact 109x56x27 mm vs mid size 121x70x36 mm), is thinner (1.1" vs 1.5") and is slightly lighter (248 g vs 355 g).

However, on average it records lower quality movies (720p @ 24fps vs 1080p @ 30fps), has a slightly lower resolution screen (460k dots vs 610k dots), doesn't have a viewfinder (none vs digital), doesn't record high-speed movies (none vs 1,200 fps) and takes slightly lower resolution photos (10 MP vs 15.9 MP).

Olympus OM-D E-M5

Olympus OM-D E-M5
3 years newer
$1,000 - $1,299 (body only)
$1,100 14-42mm lens

Significant advantages of the E-M5 (vs the D-LUX 4)

  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 60fps vs 720p @ 24fps
  • Better maximum light sensitivity: 25,600 ISO vs 3,200 ISO
  • Has a viewfinder: Digital vs None

Significant disadvantages of the E-M5 (vs the D-LUX 4)

  • No 24p support
  • Much larger: Standard size 122x89x43 mm vs Compact 109x56x27 mm
  • Significantly thicker: 1.7" vs 1.1"

common strengths of the E-M5 and D-LUX 4

  • Good image stabilization: Sensor shift vs Lens
  • Long exposures: 60 seconds vs 60 seconds
arrow Compare the Olympus OM-D E-M5 vs the Leica D-LUX 4

Olympus PEN E-P2

Olympus PEN E-P2
1 year newer
$480 17mm lens

Significant advantages of the PEN E-P2 (vs the D-LUX 4)

  • Has interchangeable lenses
  • Significantly larger sensor: Four thirds 18.0x13.5mm vs 1/1.7" 7.9x5.8mm
  • Has a CMOS-family sensor: NMOS vs CCD

Significant disadvantages of the PEN E-P2 (vs the D-LUX 4)

  • No 24p support
  • No built-in flash

common strengths of the PEN E-P2 and D-LUX 4

  • Good image stabilization: Sensor shift vs Lens
  • Long exposures: 60 seconds vs 60 seconds
arrow Compare the Olympus PEN E-P2 vs the Leica D-LUX 4

Nikon 1 J1

Nikon 1 J1
3 years newer
$547 10-30mm lens

Significant advantages of the J1 (vs the D-LUX 4)

  • Records high-speed movies: 1,200 fps vs None
  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs 720p @ 24fps
  • Shoots much faster: 60 fps vs 2.5 fps

Significant disadvantages of the J1 (vs the D-LUX 4)

  • No image stabilization: None vs Lens
  • No 24p support
  • No external flash support

common strengths of the J1 and D-LUX 4

  • Fairly small: Compact 106x61x29 mm vs Compact 109x56x27 mm
  • Thin: 1.2" vs 1.1"
  • Light weight: 277 g vs 248 g
arrow Compare the Nikon 1 J1 vs the Leica D-LUX 4

Nikon 1 V1

Nikon 1 V1
3 years newer
$797 - $947 10-30mm lens

Significant advantages of the V1 (vs the D-LUX 4)

  • Records high-speed movies: 1,200 fps vs None
  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs 720p @ 24fps
  • Shoots much faster: 60 fps vs 2.5 fps

Significant disadvantages of the V1 (vs the D-LUX 4)

  • No image stabilization: None vs Lens
  • No 24p support
  • Significantly larger: Mid size 113x76x43 mm vs Compact 109x56x27 mm

common strengths of the V1 and D-LUX 4

  • None found
arrow Compare the Nikon 1 V1 vs the Leica D-LUX 4

Sony NEX-5N

Sony NEX-5N
2 years newer
$598 - $600 (body only)
$698 - $700 18-55mm lens

Significant advantages of the NEX-5N (vs the D-LUX 4)

  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 60fps vs 720p @ 24fps
  • Better maximum light sensitivity: 25,600 ISO vs 3,200 ISO
  • Significantly higher resolution screen: 920k dots vs 460k dots

Significant disadvantages of the NEX-5N (vs the D-LUX 4)

  • No image stabilization: None vs Lens
  • Thicker: 1.5" vs 1.1"
  • Significantly shorter max exposures: 30 seconds vs 60 seconds

common strengths of the NEX-5N and D-LUX 4

  • Both support 24p, which is uncommon in cameras similar to these
  • Fairly small: Compact 111x59x38 mm vs Compact 109x56x27 mm
  • Light weight: 269 g vs 248 g
arrow Compare the Sony NEX-5N vs the Leica D-LUX 4

Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF3

Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF3
2 years newer
$469 (body only)

Significant advantages of the DMC-GF3 (vs the D-LUX 4)

  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs 720p @ 24fps
  • Has interchangeable lenses
  • Has a touch screen

Significant disadvantages of the DMC-GF3 (vs the D-LUX 4)

  • No image stabilization: None vs Lens
  • No 24p support
  • No external flash support

common strengths of the DMC-GF3 and D-LUX 4

  • Fairly small: Compact 107x67x32 mm vs Compact 109x56x27 mm
  • Thin: 1.3" vs 1.1"
  • Light weight: 264 g vs 248 g
arrow Compare the Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF3 vs the Leica D-LUX 4

compared toEntry-level DSLR competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Leica D-LUX 4 compared to entry-level DSLR competitors include: it has a slightly larger screen (3.0" vs 2.5"), has image stabilization (lens vs none), is much smaller (compact 109x56x27 mm vs professional size 132x103x77 mm), is thinner (1.1" vs 3") and is much lighter (248 g vs 668 g).

However, on average it records lower quality movies (720p @ 24fps vs 1080p @ 24fps), has a slightly lower resolution screen (460k dots vs 920k dots), takes significantly lower resolution photos (10 MP vs 16.1 MP), doesn't shoot as fast continuously (2.5 fps vs 4.5 fps) and has a much smaller sensor (1/1.7" 7.9x5.8mm vs APS-C 23.6x15.6mm).

Nikon D80

Nikon D80
2 years older
$700 (body only)

Significant advantages of the D80 (vs the D-LUX 4)

  • Much larger sensor: APS-C 23.6x15.8mm vs 1/1.7" 7.9x5.8mm
  • Has a viewfinder: Pentaprism vs None
  • Has interchangeable lenses

Significant disadvantages of the D80 (vs the D-LUX 4)

  • Much smaller screen: 2.5" vs 3.0"
  • No image stabilization: None vs Lens
  • Much larger: Professional size 132x103x77 mm vs Compact 109x56x27 mm

common strengths of the D80 and D-LUX 4

  • None found
arrow Compare the Nikon D80 vs the Leica D-LUX 4

Nikon D5100

Nikon D5100
2 years newer
$500 - $597 (body only)
$600 - $697 18-55mm lens

Significant advantages of the D5100 (vs the D-LUX 4)

  • Much larger sensor: APS-C 23.6x15.6mm vs 1/1.7" 7.9x5.8mm
  • Has a viewfinder: Pentamirror vs None
  • Faster autofocus: Phase detection vs Contrast detection

Significant disadvantages of the D5100 (vs the D-LUX 4)

  • No image stabilization: None vs Lens
  • Much larger: Prosumer size 127x96x78 mm vs Compact 109x56x27 mm
  • Much thicker: 3.1" vs 1.1"

common strengths of the D5100 and D-LUX 4

  • Larger than average screens: 3.0" vs 3.0"
  • 24p support
  • Fairly small: Prosumer size 127x96x78 mm vs Compact 109x56x27 mm
arrow Compare the Nikon D5100 vs the Leica D-LUX 4

Nikon D3100

Nikon D3100
1 year newer
$500 - $547 18-55mm lens

Significant advantages of the D3100 (vs the D-LUX 4)

  • Much larger sensor: APS-C 23.1x15.4mm vs 1/1.7" 7.9x5.8mm
  • Has a viewfinder: Pentamirror vs None
  • Faster autofocus: Phase detection vs Contrast detection

Significant disadvantages of the D3100 (vs the D-LUX 4)

  • No image stabilization: None vs Lens
  • Much larger: Prosumer size 124x96x73 mm vs Compact 109x56x27 mm
  • Much thicker: 2.9" vs 1.1"

common strengths of the D3100 and D-LUX 4

  • Larger than average screens: 3.0" vs 3.0"
  • 24p support
  • Fairly small: Prosumer size 124x96x73 mm vs Compact 109x56x27 mm
arrow Compare the Nikon D3100 vs the Leica D-LUX 4

Nikon D7000

Nikon D7000
2 years newer
$1,000 - $1,197 (body only)
$1,100 55-200mm lens

Significant advantages of the D7000 (vs the D-LUX 4)

  • Much larger sensor: APS-C 23.6x15.6mm vs 1/1.7" 7.9x5.8mm
  • Has a viewfinder: Pentaprism vs None
  • Faster autofocus: Phase detection vs Contrast detection

Significant disadvantages of the D7000 (vs the D-LUX 4)

  • No image stabilization: None vs Lens
  • Much larger: Professional size 132x105x77 mm vs Compact 109x56x27 mm
  • Much thicker: 3" vs 1.1"

common strengths of the D7000 and D-LUX 4

  • Larger than average screens: 3.0" vs 3.0"
  • 24p support
arrow Compare the Nikon D7000 vs the Leica D-LUX 4

Nikon D90

Nikon D90
similar age
$830 - $897 (body only)
$1,047 55-200mm lens

Significant advantages of the D90 (vs the D-LUX 4)

  • Much larger sensor: APS-C 23.6x15.8mm vs 1/1.7" 7.9x5.8mm
  • Has a viewfinder: Pentaprism vs None
  • Faster autofocus: Phase detection vs Contrast detection

Significant disadvantages of the D90 (vs the D-LUX 4)

  • No image stabilization: None vs Lens
  • Much larger: Professional size 132x103x77 mm vs Compact 109x56x27 mm
  • Much thicker: 3" vs 1.1"

common strengths of the D90 and D-LUX 4

  • Larger than average screens: 3.0" vs 3.0"
  • 24p support
arrow Compare the Nikon D90 vs the Leica D-LUX 4

Canon Rebel T2i

Canon EOS Rebel T2i
1 year newer
$544 - $949 (body only)
$649 - $867 18-55mm lens

Significant advantages of the T2i (vs the D-LUX 4)

  • Much larger sensor: APS-C 22.3x14.9mm vs 1/1.7" 7.9x5.8mm
  • Has a viewfinder: Pentamirror vs None
  • Faster autofocus: Phase detection vs Contrast detection

Significant disadvantages of the T2i (vs the D-LUX 4)

  • No image stabilization: None vs Lens
  • Much larger: Prosumer size 129x98x62 mm vs Compact 109x56x27 mm
  • Much thicker: 2.4" vs 1.1"

common strengths of the T2i and D-LUX 4

  • Larger than average screens: 3.0" vs 3.0"
  • 24p support
  • Very small: Prosumer size 129x98x62 mm vs Compact 109x56x27 mm
arrow Compare the Canon EOS Rebel T2i vs the Leica D-LUX 4

compared toTravel zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Leica D-LUX 4 compared to travel zoom competitors include: it has a much wider aperture (f/2.0 vs f/3.3), is slightly smaller (compact 109x56x27 mm vs compact 103x60x33 mm), slightly higher maximum light sensitivity (3,200 ISO vs 1,600 ISO), records movies in 24p and has a much larger sensor (1/1.7" 7.9x5.8mm vs 1/2.3" 6.1x4.6mm).

However, on average it has much less zoom (2.5x vs 16x), doesn't have a built-in GPS, records lower quality movies (720p @ 24fps vs 1080p @ 30fps), doesn't record high-speed movies (none vs 220 fps) and doesn't have a touch screen.

Leica V-LUX 20

Leica V-LUX 20
1 year newer
$742

Significant advantages of the V-LUX 20 (vs the D-LUX 4)

  • Has a GPS
  • Significantly more zoom: 12x vs 2.5x
  • Has boost ISO: 6,400 ISO vs None

Significant disadvantages of the V-LUX 20 (vs the D-LUX 4)

  • Much narrower aperture: f/3.3 vs f/2.0
  • Much smaller sensor: 1/2.3" 6.1x4.6mm vs 1/1.7" 7.9x5.8mm
  • No 24p support

common strengths of the V-LUX 20 and D-LUX 4

  • Very long exposure times: 60 seconds vs 60 seconds
arrow Compare the V-LUX 20 vs the D-LUX 4

Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS10

Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS10
2 years newer
$328

Significant advantages of the DMC-ZS10 (vs the D-LUX 4)

  • Much more zoom: 16x vs 2.5x
  • Has a GPS
  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs 720p @ 24fps

Significant disadvantages of the DMC-ZS10 (vs the D-LUX 4)

  • Much narrower aperture: f/3.3 vs f/2.0
  • Much smaller sensor: 1/2.3" 6.1x4.6mm vs 1/1.7" 7.9x5.8mm
  • No 24p support

common strengths of the DMC-ZS10 and D-LUX 4

  • Good wide angle: 24 mm vs 24 mm
  • Very long exposure times: 60 seconds vs 60 seconds
arrow Compare the Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS10 vs the Leica D-LUX 4

compared toSuper zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Leica D-LUX 4 compared to super zoom competitors include: it has a significantly wider aperture (f/2.0 vs f/3.0), has a slightly larger screen (3.0" vs 2.7"), is much smaller (compact 109x56x27 mm vs professional size 123x92x108 mm), records movies in 24p and has a much larger sensor (1/1.7" 7.9x5.8mm vs 1/2.3" 6.2x4.6mm).

However, on average it has way more less zoom (2.5x vs 35x), records lower quality movies (720p @ 24fps vs 1080p @ 24fps), doesn't record high-speed movies (none vs 240 fps), doesn't shoot as fast continuously (2.5 fps vs 10.3 fps) and doesn't have a screen which flips out.

Nikon Coolpix P510

Nikon Coolpix P510
3 years newer
$397 - $400

Significant advantages of the P510 (vs the D-LUX 4)

  • Much more zoom: 41.7x vs 2.5x
  • Has a flip-out screen
  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs 720p @ 24fps

Significant disadvantages of the P510 (vs the D-LUX 4)

  • Much narrower aperture: f/3.0 vs f/2.0
  • Much larger: Professional size 120x83x102 mm vs Compact 109x56x27 mm
  • Much smaller sensor: 1/2.3" 6.2x4.6mm vs 1/1.7" 7.9x5.8mm

common strengths of the P510 and D-LUX 4

  • None found
arrow Compare the Nikon Coolpix P510 vs the Leica D-LUX 4

Canon Powershot SX40

Canon Powershot SX40
3 years newer
$347 - $380

Significant advantages of the SX40 (vs the D-LUX 4)

  • Much more zoom: 35x vs 2.5x
  • Has a flip-out screen
  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 24fps vs 720p @ 24fps

Significant disadvantages of the SX40 (vs the D-LUX 4)

  • Much larger: Professional size 123x92x108 mm vs Compact 109x56x27 mm
  • Significantly narrower aperture: f/2.7 vs f/2.0
  • Much smaller sensor: 1/2.3" 6.2x4.6mm vs 1/1.7" 7.9x5.8mm

common strengths of the SX40 and D-LUX 4

  • Wide aperture: f/2.7 vs f/2.0
  • Both support 24p, which is uncommon in cameras similar to these
  • Support external flash
arrow Compare the Canon Powershot SX40 vs the Leica D-LUX 4

Leica V-Lux 2

Leica V-Lux 2
2 years newer
$1,177

Significant advantages of the V-Lux 2 (vs the D-LUX 4)

  • Much more zoom: 24x vs 2.5x
  • Has a flip-out screen
  • Has a CMOS-family sensor: CMOS vs CCD

Significant disadvantages of the V-Lux 2 (vs the D-LUX 4)

  • Significantly narrower aperture: f/2.8 vs f/2.0
  • Much larger: Prosumer size 124x80x95 mm vs Compact 109x56x27 mm
  • Much smaller sensor: 1/2.3" 6.1x4.6mm vs 1/1.7" 7.9x5.8mm

common strengths of the V-Lux 2 and D-LUX 4

  • RAW support
  • Support external flash
  • Very long exposure times: 60 seconds vs 60 seconds
arrow Compare the V-Lux 2 vs the D-LUX 4