Leica TL

3.7", 1,230k dots, 1080p @ 30fps
Retailer
    Style
      Color
        You save

        Summary Leica TL

        Prices Price
        Camera only
        $1,425
        all TL prices
        Score Snapsort rank
        Within its price range
        #n/a of 6
        Among similar cameras
        #n/a of 16
        Specifications Key specs
        Zoom
        Help Unknown
        Screen size
        Help 3.7"
        Aperture
        Help Unknown
        Screen resolution
        Help 1,230k dots
        Wide angle
        Help Unknown
        Movie format
        Help 1080p @ 30fps
        see all specifications

        Pros

        Report a correction

        The Leica TL vs other recent boutiques

        Screen size Huge screen Help
        3.7"
        Battery life Above average battery life Help
        400 shots
        Thickness Thin Help
        1.3"
        Built-in flash Built-in flash Help
        Usually standard
        Size Quite small Help
        Mid size (134×69×33 mm)
        GPS Built-in GPS Help
        Great for travel
        Weight Light Help
        384 g
        Lowest price Inexpensive Help
        $1,240.00

        Cons

        Report a correction

        The Leica TL vs other recent boutiques

        Continuous shooting Slow continuous shooting Help
        5 fps
        True resolution Lower true resolution Help
        16.1 MP
        Autofocus contrast detection autofocus Help
        slower focusing
        Sensor size Slightly smaller than average sensor Help
        APS-C 23.6x15.7mm
        Popularity Not so popular Help
        Among snapsort users
        Light sensitivity Poor maximum light sensitivity Help
        12,500 ISO
        Screen flips out Fixed screen Help
        Less flexible
        External mic jack Lacks an external mic jack Help
        Limited to the in-camera mic
        Announced Old Help
        November 2016

        Appearance

        front photo of the Leica TL

        Discussion

        Leica TL
        TL
        Leica

        Report a correction

        Showing 0 comments