As well as being compared against other travel zooms, the Leica C-Lux is also often compared to boutiques, waterproofs, mirrorless, pro digicams and super zooms. The Leica C-Lux's top rivals come from Nikon (such as the Coolpix A1000 and the Coolpix W300) and Panasonic (such as the Lumix DC-ZS200 (Lumix DC-TZ200) and the Lumix DC-GX9)

compared toTravel zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Leica C-Lux compared to other travel zoom competitors include: it has a slightly higher resolution screen (1,240k dots vs 1,040k dots), takes significantly higher resolution photos (20 MP vs 9.7 MP), significantly higher maximum light sensitivity (25,600 ISO vs 6,400 ISO), has a slightly larger sensor (nikon CX 13.2x8.8mm vs 1/2.3" 6.17x4.55mm) and has a significantly longer battery life (370 shots vs 265 shots).

However, on average it doesn't have a screen which flips out, users slower contrast detection autofocus (contrast detection vs phase detection), has slightly fewer focus points (49 vs 315), is older (june 2018 vs september 2018) and is significantly more expensive ($999.00 vs $476.95).

Nikon Coolpix A1000

Placeholder
7 months newer
$477

Significant advantages of the Coolpix A1000 (vs the C-Lux)

  • Has a flip-out screen
  • Significantly faster max shutter speed: 1/4000 of a second vs 1/2000 of a second

Significant disadvantages of the Coolpix A1000 (vs the C-Lux)

  • Significantly lower resolution screen: 921k dots vs 1,240k dots
  • Worse maximum light sensitivity: 6,400 ISO vs 25,600 ISO
  • Much lower true resolution: 9.7 MP vs 20 MP

common strengths of the Coolpix A1000 and C-Lux

  • None found

Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS200 (Lumix DC-TZ200)

Placeholder
4 months older

Significant advantages of the Lumix DC-ZS200 (Lumix DC-TZ200) (vs the C-Lux)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the Lumix DC-ZS200 (Lumix DC-TZ200) (vs the C-Lux)

  • None found

common strengths of the Lumix DC-ZS200 (Lumix DC-TZ200) and C-Lux

  • High resolution screens: 1,240k dots vs 1,240k dots
  • Extremely good maximum light sensitivity: 25,600 ISO vs 25,600 ISO
  • Capture very high resolution images: 20 MP vs 20 MP

Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS80 (Lumix DC-TZ95)

Placeholder
8 months newer

Significant advantages of the Lumix DC-ZS80 (Lumix DC-TZ95) (vs the C-Lux)

  • Has a flip-out screen

Significant disadvantages of the Lumix DC-ZS80 (Lumix DC-TZ95) (vs the C-Lux)

  • Worse maximum light sensitivity: 6,400 ISO vs 25,600 ISO
  • Much lower true resolution: 9.7 MP vs 20 MP
  • Much smaller sensor: 1/2.3" 6.17x4.55mm vs Nikon CX 13.2x8.8mm

common strengths of the Lumix DC-ZS80 (Lumix DC-TZ95) and C-Lux

  • Great battery life: 380 shots vs 370 shots

Canon PowerShot SX740 HS

Placeholder
similar age
$338 - $399

Significant advantages of the PowerShot SX740 HS (vs the C-Lux)

  • Has a flip-out screen
  • Significantly faster max shutter speed: 1/3200 of a second vs 1/2000 of a second

Significant disadvantages of the PowerShot SX740 HS (vs the C-Lux)

  • Worse maximum light sensitivity: 3,200 ISO vs 25,600 ISO
  • Significantly lower resolution screen: 922k dots vs 1,240k dots
  • Much lower true resolution: 9.7 MP vs 20 MP

common strengths of the PowerShot SX740 HS and C-Lux

  • None found

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX99

Placeholder
similar age
$448

Significant advantages of the Cyber-shot DSC-HX99 (vs the C-Lux)

  • Has a flip-out screen

Significant disadvantages of the Cyber-shot DSC-HX99 (vs the C-Lux)

  • Significantly lower resolution screen: 921k dots vs 1,240k dots
  • Much lower true resolution: 9.7 MP vs 20 MP
  • Much smaller sensor: 1/2.3" 6.17x4.55mm vs Nikon CX 13.2x8.8mm

common strengths of the Cyber-shot DSC-HX99 and C-Lux

  • None found

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 VI

Placeholder
similar age
$1,198

Significant advantages of the Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 VI (vs the C-Lux)

  • Wider aperture: f/2.8 vs f/3.3
  • Faster autofocus: Phase detection vs Contrast detection
  • Shoots much faster: 24 fps vs 10 fps

Significant disadvantages of the Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 VI (vs the C-Lux)

  • Much shorter battery life: 240 shots vs 370 shots
  • Worse maximum light sensitivity: 12,800 ISO vs 25,600 ISO
  • Significantly shorter max exposures: 30 seconds vs 60 seconds

common strengths of the Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 VI and C-Lux

  • High resolution screens: 1,228k dots vs 1,240k dots
  • Capture very high resolution images: 20 MP vs 20 MP
  • Large sensors: Nikon CX 13.2x8.8mm vs Nikon CX 13.2x8.8mm

compared toBoutique competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Leica C-Lux compared to boutique competitors include: it has way more more zoom (15x vs 3.1x), has a touch screen, is newer (june 2018 vs january 2017) and has a built-in flash.

However, on average it has a much narrower aperture (f/3.3 vs f/1.7), has a slightly smaller screen (3" vs 3.7"), has a marginally smaller sensor (nikon CX 13.2x8.8mm vs APS-C 23.5x15.6mm), slightly smaller viewfinder (0.19x vs 0.67x) and users slower contrast detection autofocus (contrast detection vs phase detection).

Leica D-Lux (Typ 109)

Leica D-Lux (Typ 109)
3 years older
$895 - $966

Significant advantages of the D-Lux (Typ 109) (vs the C-Lux)

  • Much wider aperture: f/1.7 vs f/3.3
  • Significantly larger viewfinder: 0.67x vs 0.19x
  • Supports an external flash

Significant disadvantages of the D-Lux (Typ 109) (vs the C-Lux)

  • Much less zoom: 3.1x vs 15x
  • No touch screen
  • Shorter battery life: 300 shots vs 370 shots

common strengths of the D-Lux (Typ 109) and C-Lux

  • Great zoom: 3.1x vs 15x
  • Fairly small: Mid size (118×66×55 mm) vs Mid size (113×67×46 mm)
  • Good image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs
    1. Lens

Panasonic Lumix DC-LX100 II

Placeholder
similar age
$898

Significant advantages of the Lumix DC-LX100 II (vs the C-Lux)

  • Much wider aperture: f/1.7 vs f/3.3
  • Supports an external flash
  • Much longer exposures: 1800 seconds vs 60 seconds

Significant disadvantages of the Lumix DC-LX100 II (vs the C-Lux)

  • Much less zoom: 3.1x vs 15x
  • No built-in flash

common strengths of the Lumix DC-LX100 II and C-Lux

  • Great zoom: 3.1x vs 15x
  • Fairly small: Standard size (115×66×64 mm) vs Mid size (113×67×46 mm)
  • Good image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs
    1. Lens

Leica D-Lux 7

Placeholder
5 months newer
$1,195

Significant advantages of the D-Lux 7 (vs the C-Lux)

  • Much wider aperture: f/1.7 vs f/3.3
  • Supports an external flash
  • Much longer exposures: 1800 seconds vs 60 seconds

Significant disadvantages of the D-Lux 7 (vs the C-Lux)

  • Much less zoom: 3.1x vs 15x
  • No built-in flash

common strengths of the D-Lux 7 and C-Lux

  • Great zoom: 3.1x vs 15x
  • Fairly small: Standard size (118×66×64 mm) vs Mid size (113×67×46 mm)
  • Good image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs
    1. Lens

Leica TL

Leica TL
1 year older
$1,425

Significant advantages of the TL (vs the C-Lux)

  • Much larger screen: 3.7" vs 3"
  • Has a GPS
  • Supports an external flash

Significant disadvantages of the TL (vs the C-Lux)

  • Shoots significantly slower: 5 fps vs 10 fps

common strengths of the TL and C-Lux

  • Fairly small: Mid size (134×69×33 mm) vs Mid size (113×67×46 mm)
  • Great battery life: 400 shots vs 370 shots
  • Thin: 1.3" vs 1.8"

Ricoh GR III

Placeholder
3 months newer
$900

Significant advantages of the GR III (vs the C-Lux)

  • Faster autofocus: Phase detection vs Contrast detection
  • Supports an external flash
  • Significantly faster max shutter speed: 1/4000 of a second vs 1/2000 of a second

Significant disadvantages of the GR III (vs the C-Lux)

  • Worse image stabilization:
    1. Sensor shift
    vs
    1. Lens
  • No built-in flash

common strengths of the GR III and C-Lux

  • Fairly small: Compact (109×62×33 mm) vs Mid size (113×67×46 mm)
  • Light weight: 257 g vs 340 g
  • Thin: 1.3" vs 1.8"

Fujifilm X100F

Fujifilm X100F
1 year older
$1,050 - $1,299

Significant advantages of the X100F (vs the C-Lux)

  • Much wider aperture: f/2 vs f/3.3
  • Faster autofocus: Phase detection vs Contrast detection
  • Has an external mic jack

Significant disadvantages of the X100F (vs the C-Lux)

  • No touch screen

common strengths of the X100F and C-Lux

  • Fairly small: Standard size (127×75×52 mm) vs Mid size (113×67×46 mm)
  • Great battery life: 390 shots vs 370 shots
  • Thin: 2" vs 1.8"

compared toWaterproof competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Leica C-Lux compared to waterproof competitors include: it has a slightly higher resolution screen (1,240k dots vs 921k dots), takes much higher resolution photos (20 MP vs 9.7 MP), much higher maximum light sensitivity (25,600 ISO vs 6,400 ISO), has a touch screen and has a much larger sensor (nikon CX 13.2x8.8mm vs 1/2.3" 6.17x4.55mm).

However, on average it has a slightly narrower aperture (f/3.3 vs f/2.8), is much larger (mid size (113×67×46 mm) vs compact (110×66×27 mm)), doesn't have an OLED screen (LCD vs OLED), is thicker (1.8" vs 1.1") and is significantly heavier (340 g vs 221 g).

Nikon Coolpix W300

Placeholder
1 year older
$339 - $387

Significant advantages of the Coolpix W300 (vs the C-Lux)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the Coolpix W300 (vs the C-Lux)

  • None found

common strengths of the Coolpix W300 and C-Lux

  • None found

Nikon AW130

Nikon AW130
3 years older
$430

Significant advantages of the AW130 (vs the C-Lux)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the AW130 (vs the C-Lux)

  • None found

common strengths of the AW130 and C-Lux

  • None found

compared toMirrorless interchangeable-lens competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Leica C-Lux compared to mirrorless interchangeable-lens competitors include: it has a slightly higher resolution screen (1,240k dots vs 1,040k dots), has better image stabilization (lens vs sensor shift), is slightly smaller (mid size (113×67×46 mm) vs professional size (137×97×92 mm)), is thinner (1.8" vs 3") and is slightly lighter (340 g vs 658 g).

However, on average it much smaller viewfinder (0.19x vs 0.72x), doesn't shoot as fast continuously (10 fps vs 30 fps), doesn't have a screen which flips out, has a marginally smaller sensor (nikon CX 13.2x8.8mm vs APS-C 23.5x15.6mm) and lacks and external mic jack.

Panasonic Lumix DC-GX9

Placeholder
4 months older
$784 (body only)
$798 12-60mm lens

Significant advantages of the Lumix DC-GX9 (vs the C-Lux)

  • Much larger viewfinder: 0.67x vs 0.19x
  • Has a flip-out screen
  • Has interchangeable lenses

Significant disadvantages of the Lumix DC-GX9 (vs the C-Lux)

  • Worse image stabilization:
    1. Sensor shift
    vs
    1. Lens

common strengths of the Lumix DC-GX9 and C-Lux

  • High resolution screens: 1,240k dots vs 1,240k dots
  • Fairly small: Mid size (124×72×47 mm) vs Mid size (113×67×46 mm)
  • Light weight: 407 g vs 340 g

Panasonic Lumix DC-G9

Placeholder
7 months older
$1,198 - $2,046 (body only)
$1,898 - $1,899 12-60mm lens

Significant advantages of the Lumix DC-G9 (vs the C-Lux)

  • Much larger viewfinder: 0.80x vs 0.19x
  • Has a flip-out screen
  • Has interchangeable lenses

Significant disadvantages of the Lumix DC-G9 (vs the C-Lux)

  • Worse image stabilization:
    1. Sensor shift
    vs
    1. Lens
  • Lower resolution screen: 1,040k dots vs 1,240k dots
  • Much larger: Professional size (137×97×92 mm) vs Mid size (113×67×46 mm)

common strengths of the Lumix DC-G9 and C-Lux

  • Long exposures: 60 seconds vs 60 seconds

Olympus PEN E-PL9

Placeholder
4 months older
$549 - $600 (body only)
$699 - $700 14-42mm lens

Significant advantages of the PEN E-PL9 (vs the C-Lux)

  • Has a flip-out screen
  • Has interchangeable lenses
  • Supports an external flash

Significant disadvantages of the PEN E-PL9 (vs the C-Lux)

  • Worse image stabilization:
    1. Sensor shift
    vs
    1. Lens
  • No viewfinder: None vs Digital
  • Lower resolution screen: 1,040k dots vs 1,240k dots

common strengths of the PEN E-PL9 and C-Lux

  • Fairly small: Mid size (117×68×39 mm) vs Mid size (113×67×46 mm)
  • Thin: 1.5" vs 1.8"
  • Light weight: 380 g vs 340 g

Olympus OM-D E-M1X

Placeholder
7 months newer
$2,999 (body only)
$3,798 12-40mm lens

Significant advantages of the OM-D E-M1X (vs the C-Lux)

  • Much larger viewfinder: 0.72x vs 0.19x
  • Shoots much faster: 60 fps vs 10 fps
  • Has a flip-out screen

Significant disadvantages of the OM-D E-M1X (vs the C-Lux)

  • Worse image stabilization:
    1. Sensor shift
    vs
    1. Lens
  • Lower resolution screen: 1,037k dots vs 1,240k dots
  • Much larger: Large (144×147×75 mm) vs Mid size (113×67×46 mm)

common strengths of the OM-D E-M1X and C-Lux

  • Long exposures: 60 seconds vs 60 seconds

Fujifilm X-T30

Placeholder
8 months newer
$899 (body only)
$999 - $1,039 15-45mm lens

Significant advantages of the X-T30 (vs the C-Lux)

  • Much larger viewfinder: 0.61x vs 0.19x
  • Has a flip-out screen
  • Has interchangeable lenses

Significant disadvantages of the X-T30 (vs the C-Lux)

  • Lower resolution screen: 1,040k dots vs 1,240k dots
  • Significantly shorter max exposures: 30 seconds vs 60 seconds

common strengths of the X-T30 and C-Lux

  • Fairly small: Standard size (118×83×47 mm) vs Mid size (113×67×46 mm)
  • Light weight: 383 g vs 340 g
  • Thin: 1.9" vs 1.8"

compared toPro digicam competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Leica C-Lux compared to pro digicam competitors include: it has a built-in flash, significantly higher maximum light sensitivity (25,600 ISO vs 12,800 ISO), has a touch screen, has a much longer battery life (370 shots vs 220 shots) and is newer (june 2018 vs february 2016).

However, on average it has a much narrower aperture (f/3.3 vs f/1.8), doesn't shoot as fast continuously (10 fps vs 24 fps), doesn't have a screen which flips out, doesn't have an OLED screen (LCD vs OLED) and users slower contrast detection autofocus (contrast detection vs phase detection).

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V
1 year older
$998 - $1,010

Significant advantages of the Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V (vs the C-Lux)

  • Much wider aperture: f/1.8 vs f/3.3
  • Faster autofocus: Phase detection vs Contrast detection
  • Shoots much faster: 24 fps vs 10 fps

Significant disadvantages of the Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V (vs the C-Lux)

  • Much shorter battery life: 220 shots vs 370 shots
  • No touch screen
  • Worse maximum light sensitivity: 12,800 ISO vs 25,600 ISO

common strengths of the Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V and C-Lux

  • Large sensors: Nikon CX 13.2x8.8mm vs Nikon CX 13.2x8.8mm
  • Each has a built-in flash
  • High resolution screens: 1,228k dots vs 1,240k dots

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 IV

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 IV
3 years older
$650 - $898

Significant advantages of the DSC-RX100 IV (vs the C-Lux)

  • Much wider aperture: f/1.8 vs f/3.3
  • Has a flip-out screen

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-RX100 IV (vs the C-Lux)

  • No touch screen
  • Worse maximum light sensitivity: 12,800 ISO vs 25,600 ISO
  • Significantly shorter battery life: 280 shots vs 370 shots

common strengths of the DSC-RX100 IV and C-Lux

  • Large sensors: Nikon CX 13.2x8.8mm vs Nikon CX 13.2x8.8mm
  • Each has a built-in flash
  • High resolution screens: 1,228k dots vs 1,240k dots

Nikon DL18-50

Nikon DL18-50
2 years older

Significant advantages of the DL18-50 (vs the C-Lux)

  • Much wider aperture: f/1.8 vs f/3.3
  • Shoots much faster: 60 fps vs 10 fps
  • Much better wide angle: 18 mm vs 24 mm

Significant disadvantages of the DL18-50 (vs the C-Lux)

  • No built-in flash
  • Worse maximum light sensitivity: 12,800 ISO vs 25,600 ISO
  • Significantly shorter battery life: 290 shots vs 370 shots

common strengths of the DL18-50 and C-Lux

  • Large sensors: Nikon CX 13.2x8.8mm vs Nikon CX 13.2x8.8mm
  • Have touch screens
  • Capture very high resolution images: 20.7 MP vs 20 MP

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 VA

Placeholder
similar age
$998

Significant advantages of the Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 VA (vs the C-Lux)

  • Much wider aperture: f/1.8 vs f/3.3
  • Faster autofocus: Phase detection vs Contrast detection
  • Shoots much faster: 24 fps vs 10 fps

Significant disadvantages of the Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 VA (vs the C-Lux)

  • Much shorter battery life: 220 shots vs 370 shots
  • No touch screen
  • Worse maximum light sensitivity: 12,800 ISO vs 25,600 ISO

common strengths of the Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 VA and C-Lux

  • Large sensors: Nikon CX 13.2x8.8mm vs Nikon CX 13.2x8.8mm
  • Each has a built-in flash
  • High resolution screens: 1,228k dots vs 1,240k dots

Canon PowerShot G7 X Mark II

Canon PowerShot G7 X Mark II
2 years older
$532 - $649

Significant advantages of the PowerShot G7 X Mark II (vs the C-Lux)

  • Much wider aperture: f/1.8 vs f/3.3
  • Has a flip-out screen

Significant disadvantages of the PowerShot G7 X Mark II (vs the C-Lux)

  • Significantly shorter battery life: 265 shots vs 370 shots
  • No viewfinder: None vs Digital
  • Significantly shorter max exposures: 30 seconds vs 60 seconds

common strengths of the PowerShot G7 X Mark II and C-Lux

  • Large sensors: Nikon CX 13.2x8.8mm vs Nikon CX 13.2x8.8mm
  • Each has a built-in flash
  • Extremely good maximum light sensitivity: 25,600 ISO vs 25,600 ISO

Canon PowerShot G7 X

Canon PowerShot G7 X
3 years older
$534

Significant advantages of the G7 X (vs the C-Lux)

  • Much wider aperture: f/1.8 vs f/3.3
  • Has a flip-out screen

Significant disadvantages of the G7 X (vs the C-Lux)

  • Much shorter battery life: 210 shots vs 370 shots
  • Worse maximum light sensitivity: 12,800 ISO vs 25,600 ISO
  • No viewfinder: None vs Digital

common strengths of the G7 X and C-Lux

  • Large sensors: Nikon CX 13.2x8.8mm vs Nikon CX 13.2x8.8mm
  • Each has a built-in flash
  • Have touch screens

compared toSuper zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Leica C-Lux compared to super zoom competitors include: it has a slightly higher resolution screen (1,240k dots vs 922k dots), is significantly smaller (mid size (113×67×46 mm) vs large (137×99×131 mm)), takes slightly higher resolution photos (20 MP vs 11.8 MP), significantly higher maximum light sensitivity (25,600 ISO vs 12,800 ISO) and has a touch screen.

However, on average it has a slightly narrower aperture (f/3.3 vs f/2.8), has slightly less zoom (15x vs 65x), doesn't shoot as fast continuously (10 fps vs 60 fps), doesn't have a screen which flips out and doesn't have an OLED screen (LCD vs OLED).

Canon PowerShot SX70 HS

Placeholder
3 months newer
$478 - $549

Significant advantages of the PowerShot SX70 HS (vs the C-Lux)

  • Significantly better wide angle: 21 mm vs 24 mm
  • More zoom: 65x vs 15x
  • Has an external mic jack

Significant disadvantages of the PowerShot SX70 HS (vs the C-Lux)

  • Worse maximum light sensitivity: 3,200 ISO vs 25,600 ISO
  • Significantly lower resolution screen: 922k dots vs 1,240k dots
  • Significantly larger: Large (127×91×117 mm) vs Mid size (113×67×46 mm)

common strengths of the PowerShot SX70 HS and C-Lux

  • Fairly small: Large (127×91×117 mm) vs Mid size (113×67×46 mm)
  • Light weight: 608 g vs 340 g

Nikon Coolpix P1000

Placeholder
similar age
$849 - $997

Significant advantages of the Coolpix P1000 (vs the C-Lux)

  • Much more zoom: 125x vs 15x
  • Wider aperture: f/2.8 vs f/3.3
  • Has an external mic jack

Significant disadvantages of the Coolpix P1000 (vs the C-Lux)

  • Much larger: 146×119×181 mm vs Mid size (113×67×46 mm)
  • Significantly lower resolution screen: 921k dots vs 1,240k dots
  • Worse maximum light sensitivity: 6,400 ISO vs 25,600 ISO

common strengths of the Coolpix P1000 and C-Lux

  • Long exposures: 60 seconds vs 60 seconds

Nikon DL24-500

Nikon DL24-500
2 years older

Significant advantages of the DL24-500 (vs the C-Lux)

  • Shoots much faster: 60 fps vs 10 fps
  • Has an OLED screen: OLED vs LCD
  • Wider aperture: f/2.8 vs f/3.3

Significant disadvantages of the DL24-500 (vs the C-Lux)

  • Significantly larger: Large (123×90×139 mm) vs Mid size (113×67×46 mm)
  • Worse maximum light sensitivity: 12,800 ISO vs 25,600 ISO
  • Significantly shorter battery life: 290 shots vs 370 shots

common strengths of the DL24-500 and C-Lux

  • Capture very high resolution images: 20.7 MP vs 20 MP
  • Have touch screens
  • Large sensors: Nikon CX 13.2x8.8mm vs Nikon CX 13.2x8.8mm

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ2500 (Lumix DMC-FZ2000)

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ2500 (Lumix DMC-FZ2000)
1 year older

Significant advantages of the Lumix DMC-FZ2500 (Lumix DMC-FZ2000) (vs the C-Lux)

  • Wider aperture: f/2.8 vs f/3.3
  • Has an external mic jack
  • Has a flip-out screen

Significant disadvantages of the Lumix DMC-FZ2500 (Lumix DMC-FZ2000) (vs the C-Lux)

  • Much larger: Large (138×102×135 mm) vs Mid size (113×67×46 mm)
  • Much thicker: 5.3" vs 1.8"
  • Significantly heavier: 915 g vs 340 g

common strengths of the Lumix DMC-FZ2500 (Lumix DMC-FZ2000) and C-Lux

  • Extremely good maximum light sensitivity: 25,600 ISO vs 25,600 ISO
  • Capture very high resolution images: 20 MP vs 20 MP
  • Have touch screens

Olympus Stylus 1s

Olympus Stylus 1s
3 years older
$441

Significant advantages of the 1s (vs the C-Lux)

  • Wider aperture: f/2.8 vs f/3.3
  • Has a flip-out screen
  • Significantly longer battery life: 450 shots vs 370 shots

Significant disadvantages of the 1s (vs the C-Lux)

  • Significantly worse wide angle: 28 mm vs 24 mm
  • Significantly lower true resolution: 11.8 MP vs 20 MP
  • Significantly smaller sensor: 1/1.8" 7.44x5.58mm vs Nikon CX 13.2x8.8mm

common strengths of the 1s and C-Lux

  • Very small: Standard size (116×87×57 mm) vs Mid size (113×67×46 mm)
  • Have touch screens
  • Great battery life: 450 shots vs 370 shots

Leica V-Lux (Typ 114)

Leica V-Lux (Typ 114)
3 years older
$995 - $1,195

Significant advantages of the V-Lux (Typ 114) (vs the C-Lux)

  • Wider aperture: f/2.8 vs f/3.3
  • Has an external mic jack
  • Has a flip-out screen

Significant disadvantages of the V-Lux (Typ 114) (vs the C-Lux)

  • Significantly larger: Large (137×99×131 mm) vs Mid size (113×67×46 mm)
  • Significantly lower resolution screen: 921k dots vs 1,240k dots
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the V-Lux (Typ 114) and C-Lux

  • Extremely good maximum light sensitivity: 25,600 ISO vs 25,600 ISO
  • Capture very high resolution images: 20 MP vs 20 MP
  • Large sensors: Nikon CX 13.2x8.8mm vs Nikon CX 13.2x8.8mm