The Kyocera Finecam M410R is mostly gets compared to pro digicams and compacts. The Kyocera Finecam M410R's top rivals come from Canon (such as the PowerShot S200) and Pentax (such as the Optio M40)

Competitor classes

compared toPro digicam competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Kyocera M410R compared to pro digicam competitors include: it has a viewfinder (digital vs none).

However, on average it has a marginally smaller sensor (1/3" 5.27x3.96mm vs 1/1.7" 7.6x5.7mm), has a significantly narrower aperture (f/2.8 vs f/1.8), has a much narrower wide angle lens (37 mm vs 24 mm), has a much smaller screen (1.5" vs 3") and has a slightly lower resolution screen (110k dots vs 461k dots).

Canon PowerShot S200

Canon PowerShot S200
10 years newer
$232

Significant advantages of the S200 (vs the M410R)

  • Much smaller: Compact (100×59×26 mm) vs Prosumer size (107×73×88 mm)
  • Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 37 mm
  • Image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs None

Significant disadvantages of the S200 (vs the M410R)

  • No viewfinder: None vs Digital

common strengths of the S200 and M410R

  • None found

compared toCompact competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Kyocera M410R compared to compact competitors include: it has higher quality type of viewfinder (digital vs none) and has a faster max shutter speed (1/2000 of a second vs 1/1500 of a second).

However, on average it has a slightly smaller screen (1.5" vs 2.5"), is much larger (prosumer size (107×73×88 mm) vs super compact (97×58×18 mm)), takes slightly lower resolution photos (3.9 MP vs 8 MP), is older (february 2004 vs july 2007) and is thicker (3.4" vs 0.7").

Pentax Optio M40

Pentax Optio M40
3 years newer

Significant advantages of the M40 (vs the M410R)

  • Much smaller: Super compact (97×58×18 mm) vs Prosumer size (107×73×88 mm)
  • Much thinner: 0.7" vs 3.4"
  • Much larger screen: 2.5" vs 1.5"

Significant disadvantages of the M40 (vs the M410R)

  • None found

common strengths of the M40 and M410R

  • Each has a built-in flash
  • Viewfinders: Tunnel vs Digital

Olympus D-425

Placeholder
10 months newer

Significant advantages of the D-425 (vs the M410R)

  • Much smaller: Compact (101×52×36 mm) vs Prosumer size (107×73×88 mm)
  • Much thinner: 1.4" vs 3.4"
  • Much lighter: 170 g vs 340 g

Significant disadvantages of the D-425 (vs the M410R)

  • No viewfinder: None vs Digital
  • Significantly slower max shutter speed: 1/1500 of a second vs 1/2000 of a second

common strengths of the D-425 and M410R

  • Each has a built-in flash