Kyocera Finecam 3300
Competitors

As well as being compared against other compacts, the Kyocera Finecam 3300 is also often compared to super zooms, entry-level DSLRs, mirrorless, pro DSLRs, travel zooms and digicams. The Kyocera Finecam 3300's top rivals come from Olympus (such as the SP-810 UZ and the FE-4030) and Fujifilm (such as the FinePix S3300 and the FinePix HS30 EXR)

Generally, some of the advantages of the Kyocera 3300 compared to other compact competitors include: it has a much larger sensor (1/1.8" 7.2x5.3mm vs 1/3.6" 5.3x4.0mm).

However, on average it records lower quality movies (320 x 240 vs 720p @ 30fps), has a much narrower wide angle lens (38 mm vs 28 mm), has a much smaller screen (1.5" vs 2.7"), is much larger (compact 38x94x66 mm vs compact 95x56x24 mm) and doesn't have image stabilization (none vs lens).

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH1 9 years newer $122	Significant advantages of the DMC-FH1 (vs the 3300) Much higher true resolution: 9.8 MP vs 3.1 MP Much larger screen: 2.7" vs 1.5" Much better wide angle: 28 mm vs 38 mm Significant disadvantages of the DMC-FH1 (vs the 3300) Much smaller sensor: 1/2.3" 6.1x4.6mm vs 1/1.8" 7.2x5.3mm common strengths of the DMC-FH1 and 3300 None found
	Compare the Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH1 vs the Kyocera Finecam 3300
Canon PowerShot A2200 10 years newer $91 - $142	Significant advantages of the A2200 (vs the 3300) Much higher true resolution: 9.8 MP vs 3.1 MP Much larger screen: 2.7" vs 1.5" Much better wide angle: 28 mm vs 38 mm Significant disadvantages of the A2200 (vs the 3300) Much smaller sensor: 1/2.3" 6.2x4.6mm vs 1/1.8" 7.2x5.3mm common strengths of the A2200 and 3300 None found
	Compare the Canon PowerShot A2200 vs the Kyocera Finecam 3300
Pentax Optio RS1000 10 years newer $138 - $236	Significant advantages of the RS1000 (vs the 3300) Much higher true resolution: 9.7 MP vs 3.1 MP Much larger screen: 3.0" vs 1.5" Much better wide angle: 27 mm vs 38 mm Significant disadvantages of the RS1000 (vs the 3300) Much smaller sensor: 1/2.3" 6.2x4.6mm vs 1/1.8" 7.2x5.3mm common strengths of the RS1000 and 3300 None found
	Compare the Pentax Optio RS1000 vs the Kyocera Finecam 3300
Olympus FE-4030 9 years newer	Significant advantages of the FE-4030 (vs the 3300) Much higher true resolution: 9.8 MP vs 3.1 MP Much better wide angle: 26 mm vs 38 mm Much larger screen: 2.7" vs 1.5" Significant disadvantages of the FE-4030 (vs the 3300) Much smaller sensor: 1/2.3" 6.1x4.6mm vs 1/1.8" 7.2x5.3mm common strengths of the FE-4030 and 3300 None found
	Compare the Olympus FE-4030 vs the Kyocera Finecam 3300
Canon PowerShot A3200 IS 10 years newer $122 - $207	Significant advantages of the A3200 IS (vs the 3300) Much higher true resolution: 9.8 MP vs 3.1 MP Much larger screen: 2.7" vs 1.5" Much better wide angle: 28 mm vs 38 mm Significant disadvantages of the A3200 IS (vs the 3300) Much smaller sensor: 1/2.3" 6.2x4.6mm vs 1/1.8" 7.2x5.3mm common strengths of the A3200 IS and 3300 None found
	Compare the Canon PowerShot A3200 IS vs the Kyocera Finecam 3300
Nikon Coolpix 3200 3 years newer $200	Significant advantages of the 3200 (vs the 3300) Much thinner: 1.5" vs 2.6" Significantly better macro capability: 4 cm vs 10 cm Has a viewfinder: Tunnel vs None Significant disadvantages of the 3200 (vs the 3300) Much smaller sensor: 1/3.6" 5.3x4.0mm vs 1/1.8" 7.2x5.3mm common strengths of the 3200 and 3300 None found
	Compare the Nikon Coolpix 3200 vs the Kyocera Finecam 3300

Generally, some of the advantages of the Kyocera 3300 compared to super zoom competitors include: it is much smaller (compact 38x94x66 mm vs large 131x91x126 mm), has a much larger sensor (1/1.8" 7.2x5.3mm vs 1/2.3" 6.2x4.6mm), is thinner (2.6" vs 5") and is much lighter (240 g vs 589 g).

However, on average it has way more less zoom (2x vs 36x), records lower quality movies (320 x 240 vs 1080p @ 30fps), has a much narrower wide angle lens (38 mm vs 24 mm), has a much smaller screen (1.5" vs 3.0") and doesn't record high-speed movies (none vs 320 fps).

Olympus SP-810 UZ 11 years newer $269	Significant advantages of the SP-810 UZ (vs the 3300) Much larger screen: 3.0" vs 1.5" Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 38 mm Much more zoom: 36x vs 2x Significant disadvantages of the SP-810 UZ (vs the 3300) Much smaller sensor: 1/2.3" 6.2x4.6mm vs 1/1.8" 7.2x5.3mm Larger: Standard size 105x75x73 mm vs Compact 38x94x66 mm Significantly heavier: 413 g vs 240 g common strengths of the SP-810 UZ and 3300 Fairly small: Standard size 105x75x73 mm vs Compact 38x94x66 mm Light weight: 413 g vs 240 g Thin: 2.9" vs 2.6"
	Compare the Olympus SP-810 UZ vs the Kyocera Finecam 3300
Fujifilm FinePix S3300 10 years newer $272	Significant advantages of the S3300 (vs the 3300) Much larger screen: 3.0" vs 1.5" Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 38 mm Much higher true resolution: 9.7 MP vs 3.1 MP Significant disadvantages of the S3300 (vs the 3300) Much larger: Prosumer size 118x80x99 mm vs Compact 38x94x66 mm Much smaller sensor: 1/2.3" 6.2x4.6mm vs 1/1.8" 7.2x5.3mm Much heavier: 540 g vs 240 g common strengths of the S3300 and 3300 None found
	Compare the Fujifilm FinePix S3300 vs the Kyocera Finecam 3300
Kodak Easyshare Z990 MAX 10 years newer	Significant advantages of the Z990 MAX (vs the 3300) Much larger screen: 3.0" vs 1.5" Much higher true resolution: 9.6 MP vs 3.1 MP Much better wide angle: 28 mm vs 38 mm Significant disadvantages of the Z990 MAX (vs the 3300) Much larger: Professional size 124x86x93 mm vs Compact 38x94x66 mm Much smaller sensor: 1/2.5" 6.1x4.5mm vs 1/1.8" 7.2x5.3mm Much heavier: 589 g vs 240 g common strengths of the Z990 MAX and 3300 None found
	Compare the Kodak Easyshare Z990 MAX vs the Kyocera Finecam 3300
Fujifilm FinePix HS30 EXR 11 years newer $438 - $500	Significant advantages of the HS30 EXR (vs the 3300) Much larger screen: 3.0" vs 1.5" Much higher true resolution: 10.6 MP vs 3.1 MP Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 38 mm Significant disadvantages of the HS30 EXR (vs the 3300) Much larger: Large 131x97x126 mm vs Compact 38x94x66 mm Much smaller sensor: 1/2" 6.4x4.8mm vs 1/1.8" 7.2x5.3mm Much heavier: 687 g vs 240 g common strengths of the HS30 EXR and 3300 None found
	Compare the Fujifilm FinePix HS30 EXR vs the Kyocera Finecam 3300
Nikon Coolpix P510 11 years newer $397 - $400	Significant advantages of the P510 (vs the 3300) Much more zoom: 41.7x vs 2x Much larger screen: 3.0" vs 1.5" Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 38 mm Significant disadvantages of the P510 (vs the 3300) Much larger: Professional size 120x83x102 mm vs Compact 38x94x66 mm Much smaller sensor: 1/2.3" 6.2x4.6mm vs 1/1.8" 7.2x5.3mm Much heavier: 555 g vs 240 g common strengths of the P510 and 3300 None found
	Compare the Nikon Coolpix P510 vs the Kyocera Finecam 3300
Fujifilm FinePix HS10 9 years newer $569	Significant advantages of the HS10 (vs the 3300) Much larger screen: 3.0" vs 1.5" Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 38 mm Much higher true resolution: 9.8 MP vs 3.1 MP Significant disadvantages of the HS10 (vs the 3300) Much larger: Large 131x91x126 mm vs Compact 38x94x66 mm Much smaller sensor: 1/2.3" 6.2x4.6mm vs 1/1.8" 7.2x5.3mm Much heavier: 666 g vs 240 g common strengths of the HS10 and 3300 None found
	Compare the Fujifilm FinePix HS10 vs the Kyocera Finecam 3300

Generally, some of the advantages of the Kyocera 3300 compared to entry-level DSLR competitors include: it is much smaller (compact 38x94x66 mm vs prosumer size 127x96x78 mm), is thinner (2.6" vs 3") and is much lighter (240 g vs 560 g).

However, on average it records lower quality movies (320 x 240 vs 1080p @ 24fps), has a much smaller screen (1.5" vs 3.0"), takes much lower resolution photos (3.1 MP vs 16 MP), slightly lower maximum light sensitivity (400 ISO vs 12,800 ISO) and doesn't record movies in 24p.

Nikon D5100 10 years newer $500 - $597 (body only) $600 - $697 18-55mm lens	Significant advantages of the D5100 (vs the 3300) Much larger screen: 3.0" vs 1.5" Much larger sensor: APS-C 23.6x15.6mm vs 1/1.8" 7.2x5.3mm Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs 320 x 240 Significant disadvantages of the D5100 (vs the 3300) Much larger: Prosumer size 127x96x78 mm vs Compact 38x94x66 mm Much heavier: 560 g vs 240 g Much thicker: 3.1" vs 2.6" common strengths of the D5100 and 3300 Fairly small: Prosumer size 127x96x78 mm vs Compact 38x94x66 mm
	Compare the Nikon D5100 vs the Kyocera Finecam 3300
Nikon D7000 10 years newer $1,000 - $1,197 (body only) $1,100 55-200mm lens	Significant advantages of the D7000 (vs the 3300) Much larger screen: 3.0" vs 1.5" Much larger sensor: APS-C 23.6x15.6mm vs 1/1.8" 7.2x5.3mm Has a viewfinder: Pentaprism vs None Significant disadvantages of the D7000 (vs the 3300) Much larger: Professional size 132x105x77 mm vs Compact 38x94x66 mm Much heavier: 780 g vs 240 g Significantly thicker: 3" vs 2.6" common strengths of the D7000 and 3300 None found
	Compare the Nikon D7000 vs the Kyocera Finecam 3300
Nikon D3100 10 years newer $500 - $547 18-55mm lens	Significant advantages of the D3100 (vs the 3300) Much larger screen: 3.0" vs 1.5" Much larger sensor: APS-C 23.1x15.4mm vs 1/1.8" 7.2x5.3mm Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 24fps vs 320 x 240 Significant disadvantages of the D3100 (vs the 3300) Much larger: Prosumer size 124x96x73 mm vs Compact 38x94x66 mm Much heavier: 505 g vs 240 g Significantly thicker: 2.9" vs 2.6" common strengths of the D3100 and 3300 Fairly small: Prosumer size 124x96x73 mm vs Compact 38x94x66 mm Light weight: 505 g vs 240 g Thin: 2.9" vs 2.6"
	Compare the Nikon D3100 vs the Kyocera Finecam 3300
Sony SLT-A55 10 years newer $598 (body only) $729 18-55mm lens	Significant advantages of the SLT-A55 (vs the 3300) Much larger screen: 3.0" vs 1.5" Much larger sensor: APS-C 23.5x15.6mm vs 1/1.8" 7.2x5.3mm Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs 320 x 240 Significant disadvantages of the SLT-A55 (vs the 3300) Much larger: Prosumer size 124x92x85 mm vs Compact 38x94x66 mm Much thicker: 3.3" vs 2.6" Much heavier: 500 g vs 240 g common strengths of the SLT-A55 and 3300 Light weight: 500 g vs 240 g
	Compare the Sony SLT-A55 vs the Kyocera Finecam 3300
Canon Rebel T2i 9 years newer $544 - $949 (body only) $649 - $867 18-55mm lens	Significant advantages of the T2i (vs the 3300) Much larger screen: 3.0" vs 1.5" Much larger sensor: APS-C 22.3x14.9mm vs 1/1.8" 7.2x5.3mm Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs 320 x 240 Significant disadvantages of the T2i (vs the 3300) Much larger: Prosumer size 129x98x62 mm vs Compact 38x94x66 mm Much heavier: 530 g vs 240 g common strengths of the T2i and 3300 Very small: Prosumer size 129x98x62 mm vs Compact 38x94x66 mm Very thin: 2.4" vs 2.6"
	Compare the Canon EOS Rebel T2i vs the Kyocera Finecam 3300
Canon Rebel T3 10 years newer $333 (body only) $489 - $500 18-55mm lens	Significant advantages of the T3 (vs the 3300) Much larger screen: 2.7" vs 1.5" Much larger sensor: APS-C 22.2x14.7mm vs 1/1.8" 7.2x5.3mm Has a viewfinder: Pentamirror vs None Significant disadvantages of the T3 (vs the 3300) Much larger: Professional size 130x100x78 mm vs Compact 38x94x66 mm Significantly heavier: 459 g vs 240 g Significantly thicker: 3.1" vs 2.6" common strengths of the T3 and 3300 Light weight: 459 g vs 240 g
	Compare the Canon Rebel T3 vs the Kyocera Finecam 3300

Generally, some of the advantages of the Kyocera 3300 compared to mirrorless interchangeable-lens competitors include: it is slightly lighter (240 g vs 350 g).

However, on average it records lower quality movies (320 x 240 vs 1080p @ 60fps), has a much smaller screen (1.5" vs 3.0"), doesn't have a viewfinder (none vs digital), takes much lower resolution photos (3.1 MP vs 24 MP) and much lower maximum light sensitivity (400 ISO vs 16,000 ISO).

Sony NEX-7 11 years newer $1,200 (body only) $1,350 - $1,499 18-55mm lens	Significant advantages of the NEX-7 (vs the 3300) Much larger screen: 3.0" vs 1.5" Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 60fps vs 320 x 240 Much higher true resolution: 24 MP vs 3.1 MP Significant disadvantages of the NEX-7 (vs the 3300) None found common strengths of the NEX-7 and 3300 Fairly small: Compact 111x59x38 mm vs Compact 38x94x66 mm Each has a built-in flash
	Compare the Sony NEX-7 vs the Kyocera Finecam 3300

Generally, some of the advantages of the Kyocera 3300 compared to pro DSLR competitors include: it is much smaller (compact 38x94x66 mm vs large 137x149x76 mm), is thinner (2.6" vs 3.1"), is much lighter (240 g vs 950 g) and has a built-in flash.

However, on average it has a much smaller screen (1.5" vs 2.5"), doesn't have image stabilization (none vs sensor shift), takes much lower resolution photos (3.1 MP vs 22.1 MP), slightly lower maximum light sensitivity (400 ISO vs 25,600 ISO) and doesn't record movies in 24p.

Canon EOS 5D Mark III 11 years newer $3,499 - $3,500 (body only) $4,299 - $4,300 24-105mm lens	Significant advantages of the 5D Mark III (vs the 3300) Much larger screen: 3.2" vs 1.5" Has a viewfinder: Pentaprism vs None Much higher true resolution: 22.1 MP vs 3.1 MP Significant disadvantages of the 5D Mark III (vs the 3300) Much larger: Professional size 152x116x76 mm vs Compact 38x94x66 mm Much heavier: 950 g vs 240 g Significantly thicker: 3" vs 2.6" common strengths of the 5D Mark III and 3300 Fairly small: Professional size 152x116x76 mm vs Compact 38x94x66 mm Thin: 3" vs 2.6"
	Compare the Canon EOS 5D Mark III vs the Kyocera Finecam 3300
Konica Minolta Dynax 7D 4 years newer	Significant advantages of the Dynax 7D (vs the 3300) Much larger screen: 2.5" vs 1.5" Has a viewfinder: Pentaprism vs None Image stabilization: Sensor shift vs None Significant disadvantages of the Dynax 7D (vs the 3300) Much larger: Professional size 150x106x78 mm vs Compact 38x94x66 mm Much heavier: 845 g vs 240 g Much thicker: 3.1" vs 2.6" common strengths of the Dynax 7D and 3300 Fairly small: Professional size 150x106x78 mm vs Compact 38x94x66 mm Light weight: 845 g vs 240 g Thin: 3.1" vs 2.6"
	Compare the Konica Minolta Dynax 7D vs the Kyocera Finecam 3300
Kodak DCS Pro SLR/c 3 years newer	Significant advantages of the DCS Pro SLR/c (vs the 3300) Has a viewfinder: Pentaprism vs None Much larger sensor: Full frame 36.0x24.0mm vs 1/1.8" 7.2x5.3mm Much larger screen: 1.8" vs 1.5" Significant disadvantages of the DCS Pro SLR/c (vs the 3300) Much larger: Large 137x149x76 mm vs Compact 38x94x66 mm Much heavier: 1,000 g vs 240 g Significantly thicker: 3" vs 2.6" common strengths of the DCS Pro SLR/c and 3300 Thin: 3" vs 2.6"
	Compare the Kodak DCS Pro SLR/c vs the Kyocera Finecam 3300

Generally, some of the advantages of the Kyocera 3300 compared to travel zoom competitors include: it has a much larger sensor (1/1.8" 7.2x5.3mm vs 1/2.3" 6.2x4.6mm).

However, on average it has slightly less zoom (2x vs 21x), has a much narrower wide angle lens (38 mm vs 25 mm), records lower quality movies (320 x 240 vs 1080p @ 30fps), has a much smaller screen (1.5" vs 3.0") and doesn't record high-speed movies (none vs 240 fps).

Canon ELPH 310 HS 11 years newer $195 - $196	Significant advantages of the 310 HS (vs the 3300) Much better wide angle: 28 mm vs 38 mm Much larger screen: 3.0" vs 1.5" Much higher true resolution: 9.8 MP vs 3.1 MP Significant disadvantages of the 310 HS (vs the 3300) Much smaller sensor: 1/2.3" 6.2x4.6mm vs 1/1.8" 7.2x5.3mm common strengths of the 310 HS and 3300 Wide aperture: f/3.0 vs f/3.0
	Compare the Canon ELPH 310 HS vs the Kyocera Finecam 3300
Olympus 620 UZ 11 years newer $249 - $294	Significant advantages of the 620 UZ (vs the 3300) Much better wide angle: 25 mm vs 38 mm Much larger screen: 3.0" vs 1.5" Much higher true resolution: 9.7 MP vs 3.1 MP Significant disadvantages of the 620 UZ (vs the 3300) Much smaller sensor: 1/2.3" 6.2x4.6mm vs 1/1.8" 7.2x5.3mm Significantly heavier: 435 g vs 240 g Slower max shutter speed: 1/1500 of a second vs 1/2000 of a second common strengths of the 620 UZ and 3300 None found
	Compare the Olympus SP-620 UZ vs the Kyocera Finecam 3300
Nikon Coolpix S8100 10 years newer $100	Significant advantages of the S8100 (vs the 3300) Much larger screen: 3.0" vs 1.5" Much higher true resolution: 9.8 MP vs 3.1 MP Much better wide angle: 30 mm vs 38 mm Significant disadvantages of the S8100 (vs the 3300) Narrower aperture: f/3.5 vs f/3.0 Much smaller sensor: 1/2.3" 6.2x4.6mm vs 1/1.8" 7.2x5.3mm common strengths of the S8100 and 3300 None found
	Compare the Nikon Coolpix S8100 vs the Kyocera Finecam 3300

Generally, some of the advantages of the Kyocera 3300 compared to digicam competitors include: it takes much higher resolution photos (3.1 MP vs 1.2 MP), has a much larger sensor (1/1.8" 7.2x5.3mm vs 1/3.6" 4.8x3.6mm), is newer (july, 2000 vs june, 1998) and has a faster max shutter speed (1/2000 of a second vs 1/1000 of a second).

However, on average it has a slightly narrower wide angle lens (38 mm vs 35 mm), has a much smaller screen (1.5" vs 2.0"), is thicker (2.6" vs 1.4") and doesn't have a viewfinder (none vs tunnel).

Ricoh RDC-4300 2 years older	Significant advantages of the RDC-4300 (vs the 3300) Much larger screen: 2.0" vs 1.5" Significantly better wide angle: 35 mm vs 38 mm Has a viewfinder: Tunnel vs None Significant disadvantages of the RDC-4300 (vs the 3300) Much smaller sensor: 1/3.6" 4.8x3.6mm vs 1/1.8" 7.2x5.3mm Much lower true resolution: 1.2 MP vs 3.1 MP common strengths of the RDC-4300 and 3300 None found
	Compare the Ricoh RDC-4300 vs the Kyocera Finecam 3300
Fujifilm FinePix 2600 Zoom 1 year newer	Significant advantages of the 2600 Zoom (vs the 3300) Significantly larger screen: 1.8" vs 1.5" Has a viewfinder: Tunnel vs None Significant disadvantages of the 2600 Zoom (vs the 3300) Much smaller sensor: 1/3.6" 5.3x4.0mm vs 1/1.8" 7.2x5.3mm Much lower true resolution: 1.9 MP vs 3.1 MP Much slower max shutter speed: 1/1000 of a second vs 1/2000 of a second common strengths of the 2600 Zoom and 3300 None found
	Compare the Fujifilm FinePix 2600 Zoom vs the Kyocera Finecam 3300