As well as being compared against other compacts, the Kodak Slice is also often compared to boutiques, ultra compacts, entry-level DSLRs, travel zooms and super zooms. The Kodak Slice's top rivals come from Sony (such as the Cyber-shot DSC-TX30 and the Cyber-shot DSC-RX1) and Nikon (such as the Coolpix S80 and the Coolpix S6300)

compared toCompact competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Kodak Slice compared to other compact competitors include: it has a much larger screen (3.5" vs 3"), has a touch screen, is thinner (0.7" vs 1") and has a faster max shutter speed (1/2000 of a second vs 1/1600 of a second).

However, on average it has a much narrower aperture (f/4.8 vs f/2.7), records lower quality movies (848 x 480 @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 24fps), has a much narrower wide angle lens (35 mm vs 26 mm), doesn't record high-speed movies (none vs 240 fps) and doesn't record movies in 24p.

Nikon Coolpix S80

Nikon Coolpix S80
8 months newer
$180

Significant advantages of the S80 (vs the Slice)

  • Significantly wider aperture: f/3.6 vs f/4.8
  • Has an OLED screen: OLED vs LCD
  • Supports 24p

Significant disadvantages of the S80 (vs the Slice)

  • Significantly slower max shutter speed: 1/1500 of a second vs 1/2000 of a second

common strengths of the S80 and Slice

  • Very large screens: 3.5" vs 3.5"
  • Very small: Super compact (99×63×17 mm) vs Super compact (104×60×17 mm)
  • Good image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs
    1. Lens

Nikon Coolpix P310

Nikon Coolpix P310
2 years newer
$348

Significant advantages of the P310 (vs the Slice)

  • Much wider aperture: f/1.8 vs f/4.8
  • Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 35 mm
  • Has a CMOS-family sensor: CMOS vs CCD

Significant disadvantages of the P310 (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen
  • Significantly larger: Compact (103×58×32 mm) vs Super compact (104×60×17 mm)

common strengths of the P310 and Slice

  • Larger than average screens: 3" vs 3.5"
  • Good image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs
    1. Lens

Canon ELPH 320 HS

Canon PowerShot ELPH 320 HS
2 years newer
$170

Significant advantages of the 320 HS (vs the Slice)

  • Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 35 mm
  • Records high-speed movies: 240 fps vs None
  • Much wider aperture: f/2.7 vs f/4.8

Significant disadvantages of the 320 HS (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 3.2" vs 3.5"

common strengths of the 320 HS and Slice

  • Very large screens: 3.2" vs 3.5"
  • Fairly small: Super compact (94×57×21 mm) vs Super compact (104×60×17 mm)
  • Good image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs
    1. Lens

Canon PowerShot A3300 IS

Canon PowerShot A3300 IS
1 year newer
$150

Significant advantages of the A3300 IS (vs the Slice)

  • Much wider aperture: f/2.8 vs f/4.8
  • Much better wide angle: 28 mm vs 35 mm

Significant disadvantages of the A3300 IS (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen
  • Thicker: 1" vs 0.7"

common strengths of the A3300 IS and Slice

  • Larger than average screens: 3" vs 3.5"
  • Fairly small: Compact (95×57×24 mm) vs Super compact (104×60×17 mm)
  • Good image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs
    1. Lens

Olympus VG-160

Olympus VG-160
2 years newer
$138

Significant advantages of the VG-160 (vs the Slice)

  • Much better wide angle: 26 mm vs 35 mm
  • Much wider aperture: f/2.8 vs f/4.8

Significant disadvantages of the VG-160 (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen
  • Worse image stabilization:
    1. Digital
    vs
    1. Lens

common strengths of the VG-160 and Slice

  • Larger than average screens: 3" vs 3.5"
  • Very small: Super compact (96×57×19 mm) vs Super compact (104×60×17 mm)
  • Very thin: 0.7" vs 0.7"

Canon ELPH 100 HS

Canon ELPH 100 HS
1 year newer
$145

Significant advantages of the 100 HS (vs the Slice)

  • Records high-speed movies: 240 fps vs None
  • Much wider aperture: f/2.8 vs f/4.8
  • Much better wide angle: 28 mm vs 35 mm

Significant disadvantages of the 100 HS (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen
  • Significantly slower max shutter speed: 1/1500 of a second vs 1/2000 of a second

common strengths of the 100 HS and Slice

  • Larger than average screens: 3" vs 3.5"
  • Very small: Super compact (93×56×20 mm) vs Super compact (104×60×17 mm)
  • Good image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs
    1. Lens

compared toBoutique competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Kodak Slice compared to boutique competitors include: it has way more more zoom (5x vs 1x), has a much larger screen (3.5" vs 3"), is significantly smaller (super compact (104×60×17 mm) vs standard size (113×65×70 mm)), has image stabilization (lens vs none) and has a touch screen.

However, on average it has a much narrower aperture (f/4.8 vs f/2), records lower quality movies (848 x 480 @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 60fps), takes slightly lower resolution photos (9.7 MP vs 24 MP), slightly lower maximum light sensitivity (3,200 ISO vs 25,600 ISO) and doesn't record movies in 24p.

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX1

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX1
2 years newer
$2,798 - $2,800

Significant advantages of the DSC-RX1 (vs the Slice)

  • Much wider aperture: f/2 vs f/4.8
  • Has in-camera HDR
  • Can create panoramas in-camera

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-RX1 (vs the Slice)

  • Much less zoom: 1x vs 5x
  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • Much worse macro capability: 14.0 cm vs 10.0 cm

common strengths of the DSC-RX1 and Slice

  • Fairly small: Standard size (113×65×70 mm) vs Super compact (104×60×17 mm)
  • Each has a built-in flash

compared toUltra compact competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Kodak Slice compared to ultra compact competitors include: it has a much larger screen (3.5" vs 2.7"), has a touch screen and has a faster max shutter speed (1/2000 of a second vs 1/1500 of a second).

However, on average it has a significantly narrower aperture (f/4.8 vs f/3.2), records lower quality movies (848 x 480 @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 60fps), has a much narrower wide angle lens (35 mm vs 26 mm), doesn't shoot as fast continuously (3 fps vs 10 fps) and has a CCD-family sensor (CCD vs CMOS).

Kodak EasyShare M590

Kodak EasyShare M590
7 months newer
$119

Significant advantages of the M590 (vs the Slice)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the M590 (vs the Slice)

  • None found

common strengths of the M590 and Slice

  • None found

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX30

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX30
3 years newer
$228

Significant advantages of the DSC-TX30 (vs the Slice)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-TX30 (vs the Slice)

  • None found

common strengths of the DSC-TX30 and Slice

  • None found

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX20

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX20
2 years newer
$315

Significant advantages of the DSC-TX20 (vs the Slice)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-TX20 (vs the Slice)

  • None found

common strengths of the DSC-TX20 and Slice

  • None found

Sony Cybershot TX10

Sony Cybershot DSC-TX10
1 year newer
$344

Significant advantages of the TX10 (vs the Slice)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the TX10 (vs the Slice)

  • None found

common strengths of the TX10 and Slice

  • None found

Canon PowerShot SD780 IS

Canon PowerShot SD780 IS
10 months older
$240

Significant advantages of the SD780 IS (vs the Slice)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the SD780 IS (vs the Slice)

  • None found

common strengths of the SD780 IS and Slice

  • None found

Nikon Coolpix S3100

Nikon Coolpix S3100
1 year newer
$149

Significant advantages of the S3100 (vs the Slice)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the S3100 (vs the Slice)

  • None found

common strengths of the S3100 and Slice

  • None found

compared toEntry-level DSLR competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Kodak Slice compared to entry-level DSLR competitors include: it has a much larger screen (3.5" vs 3"), has image stabilization (lens vs none), has a touch screen, is much smaller (super compact (104×60×17 mm) vs professional size (132×101×78 mm)) and is significantly less expensive ($140.99 vs $679.00).

However, on average it records lower quality movies (848 x 480 @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps), takes much lower resolution photos (9.7 MP vs 24 MP), doesn't record movies in 24p, doesn't shoot as fast continuously (3 fps vs 5 fps) and doesn't have a screen which flips out.

Canon EOS Rebel T6i

Canon EOS Rebel T6i
5 years newer
$799 18-55mm lens

Significant advantages of the T6i (vs the Slice)

  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs 848 x 480 @ 30fps
  • Has a viewfinder: Pentamirror vs None
  • Much higher true resolution: 24 MP vs 9.7 MP

Significant disadvantages of the T6i (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • Much thicker: 3.1" vs 0.7"
  • Much larger: Professional size (132×101×78 mm) vs Super compact (104×60×17 mm)

common strengths of the T6i and Slice

  • Have touch screens

Canon Rebel T4i

Canon Rebel T4i
2 years newer
$699 (body only)
$679 18-55mm lens

Significant advantages of the T4i (vs the Slice)

  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs 848 x 480 @ 30fps
  • Has a viewfinder: Pentamirror vs None
  • Supports 24p

Significant disadvantages of the T4i (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • Much thicker: 3.1" vs 0.7"
  • Much larger: Professional size (133×100×79 mm) vs Super compact (104×60×17 mm)

common strengths of the T4i and Slice

  • Have touch screens

Canon Rebel T3i

Canon Rebel T3i
1 year newer
$430 18-55mm lens

Significant advantages of the T3i (vs the Slice)

  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs 848 x 480 @ 30fps
  • Has a viewfinder: Pentamirror vs None
  • Supports 24p

Significant disadvantages of the T3i (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • Much thicker: 3.1" vs 0.7"
  • Much larger: Professional size (133×100×80 mm) vs Super compact (104×60×17 mm)

common strengths of the T3i and Slice

  • Inexpensive: $429.99 vs $140.99

Nikon D3200

Nikon D3200
2 years newer
$317 (body only)
$520 18-55mm lens

Significant advantages of the D3200 (vs the Slice)

  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs 848 x 480 @ 30fps
  • Has a viewfinder: Pentamirror vs None
  • Much higher true resolution: 24.1 MP vs 9.7 MP

Significant disadvantages of the D3200 (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • Much thicker: 3" vs 0.7"
  • No image stabilization: None vs
    1. Lens

common strengths of the D3200 and Slice

  • Light weight: 505 g vs 158 g
  • Inexpensive: $316.90 vs $140.99

compared toTravel zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Kodak Slice compared to travel zoom competitors include: it has a much larger screen (3.5" vs 2.7"), is significantly smaller (super compact (104×60×17 mm) vs compact (105×58×33 mm)), has a touch screen, is thinner (0.7" vs 1.3") and is slightly lighter (158 g vs 214 g).

However, on average it has slightly less zoom (5x vs 20x), has a much narrower wide angle lens (35 mm vs 24 mm), has a much narrower aperture (f/4.8 vs f/3.3), doesn't have a built-in GPS and records lower quality movies (848 x 480 @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 24fps).

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX300

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX300
3 years newer
$287

Significant advantages of the DSC-WX300 (vs the Slice)

  • Much better wide angle: 25 mm vs 35 mm
  • Significantly wider aperture: f/3.5 vs f/4.8
  • Has a CMOS-family sensor: CMOS vs CCD

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-WX300 (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen
  • Significantly thicker: 1" vs 0.7"

common strengths of the DSC-WX300 and Slice

  • Very small: Compact (96×55×25 mm) vs Super compact (104×60×17 mm)
  • Very thin: 1" vs 0.7"
  • Light weight: 166 g vs 158 g

Nikon Coolpix S6300

Nikon Coolpix S6300
2 years newer
$200

Significant advantages of the S6300 (vs the Slice)

  • Much better wide angle: 25 mm vs 35 mm
  • Much wider aperture: f/3.2 vs f/4.8
  • Has a CMOS-family sensor: CMOS vs CCD

Significant disadvantages of the S6300 (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen
  • Significantly thicker: 1" vs 0.7"

common strengths of the S6300 and Slice

  • Very small: Compact (94×58×26 mm) vs Super compact (104×60×17 mm)
  • Thin: 1" vs 0.7"
  • Light weight: 160 g vs 158 g

Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS10

Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS10
1 year newer
$610

Significant advantages of the DMC-ZS10 (vs the Slice)

  • Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 35 mm
  • Records high-speed movies: 220 fps vs None
  • Much wider aperture: f/3.3 vs f/4.8

Significant disadvantages of the DMC-ZS10 (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • Much larger: Compact (105×58×33 mm) vs Super compact (104×60×17 mm)
  • Much thicker: 1.3" vs 0.7"

common strengths of the DMC-ZS10 and Slice

  • Have touch screens

Canon PowerShot ELPH 150 IS

Canon PowerShot ELPH 150 IS
4 years newer
$352

Significant advantages of the ELPH 150 IS (vs the Slice)

  • Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 35 mm
  • Much wider aperture: f/3 vs f/4.8

Significant disadvantages of the ELPH 150 IS (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen
  • Thicker: 0.9" vs 0.7"

common strengths of the ELPH 150 IS and Slice

  • Very small: Compact (95×57×24 mm) vs Super compact (104×60×17 mm)
  • Very thin: 0.9" vs 0.7"
  • Light weight: 142 g vs 158 g

Panasonic Lumix DMC-TZ60

Panasonic Lumix DMC-TZ60
4 years newer
$251

Significant advantages of the DMC-TZ60 (vs the Slice)

  • Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 35 mm
  • Much more zoom: 30x vs 5x
  • Much wider aperture: f/3.3 vs f/4.8

Significant disadvantages of the DMC-TZ60 (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • Much larger: Compact (111×64×34 mm) vs Super compact (104×60×17 mm)
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the DMC-TZ60 and Slice

  • None found

Canon PowerShot SX260 HS

Canon PowerShot SX260 HS
2 years newer
$419

Significant advantages of the SX260 HS (vs the Slice)

  • Much better wide angle: 25 mm vs 35 mm
  • Records high-speed movies: 240 fps vs None
  • Has a GPS

Significant disadvantages of the SX260 HS (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • Much larger: Compact (106×61×33 mm) vs Super compact (104×60×17 mm)
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the SX260 HS and Slice

  • None found

compared toSuper zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Kodak Slice compared to super zoom competitors include: it has a much larger screen (3.5" vs 3"), is significantly smaller (super compact (104×60×17 mm) vs professional size (116×84×103 mm)), has better image stabilization (lens vs sensor shift), has a touch screen and is thinner (0.7" vs 3.6").

However, on average it has a much narrower aperture (f/4.8 vs f/3.1), has slightly less zoom (5x vs 34.8x), has a much narrower wide angle lens (35 mm vs 23 mm), doesn't record high-speed movies (none vs 240 fps) and doesn't have a screen which flips out.

Kodak EashShare Z5120

Kodak EasyShare Z5120
2 years newer
$189

Significant advantages of the Z5120 (vs the Slice)

  • Much better wide angle: 26 mm vs 35 mm
  • Much wider aperture: f/3.1 vs f/4.8

Significant disadvantages of the Z5120 (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • Larger: Prosumer size (117×79×76 mm) vs Super compact (104×60×17 mm)
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the Z5120 and Slice

  • Fairly small: Prosumer size (117×79×76 mm) vs Super compact (104×60×17 mm)
  • Thin: 3" vs 0.7"
  • Light weight: 508 g vs 158 g

Nikon Coolpix P500

Nikon Coolpix P500
1 year newer
$490

Significant advantages of the P500 (vs the Slice)

  • Much better wide angle: 23 mm vs 35 mm
  • Records high-speed movies: 240 fps vs None
  • Much wider aperture: f/3.5 vs f/4.8

Significant disadvantages of the P500 (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • Significantly larger: Professional size (116×84×103 mm) vs Super compact (104×60×17 mm)
  • Worse image stabilization:
    1. Sensor shift
    vs
    1. Lens

common strengths of the P500 and Slice

  • Light weight: 481 g vs 158 g
  • Inexpensive: $489.99 vs $140.99

Nikon Coolpix L830

Nikon Coolpix L830
4 years newer
$169

Significant advantages of the L830 (vs the Slice)

  • Much better wide angle: 22 mm vs 35 mm
  • Much wider aperture: f/3 vs f/4.8
  • Records high-speed movies: 240 fps vs None

Significant disadvantages of the L830 (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • Significantly larger: Prosumer size (111×76×91 mm) vs Super compact (104×60×17 mm)
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the L830 and Slice

  • Fairly small: Prosumer size (111×76×91 mm) vs Super compact (104×60×17 mm)
  • Light weight: 508 g vs 158 g
  • Very inexpensive: $169.00 vs $140.99