As well as being compared against other compacts, the Kodak Slice is also often compared to ultra compacts, entry-level DSLRs, super zooms, travel zooms and digicams. The Kodak Slice's top rivals come from Kodak (such as the EasyShare M590 and the EasyShare M580) and Canon (such as the PowerShot SX410 IS and the Rebel T4i)

compared toCompact competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Kodak Slice compared to other compact competitors include: it has a much larger screen (3.5" vs 2.7"), is slightly smaller (super compact (104×60×17 mm) vs compact (104×60×28 mm)), has better image stabilization (lens vs digital), has a touch screen and is thinner (0.7" vs 0.9").

However, on average it has a much narrower aperture (f/4.8 vs f/2.8), records lower quality movies (848 x 480 @ 30fps vs 720p @ 24fps), has a much narrower wide angle lens (35 mm vs 28 mm), doesn't record high-speed movies (none vs 240 fps) and doesn't record movies in 24p.

Fujifilm FinePix Z90

Fujifilm FinePix Z90
1 year newer
$120

Significant advantages of the Z90 (vs the Slice)

  • Much better wide angle: 28 mm vs 35 mm
  • Significantly wider aperture: f/3.9 vs f/4.8

Significant disadvantages of the Z90 (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • Worse image stabilization:
    1. Digital
    vs
    1. Lens

common strengths of the Z90 and Slice

  • Larger than average screens: 3" vs 3.5"
  • Fairly small: Super compact (95×57×20 mm) vs Super compact (104×60×17 mm)
  • Have touch screens

Nikon Coolpix S70

Nikon Coolpix S70
5 months older
$93

Significant advantages of the S70 (vs the Slice)

  • Much better wide angle: 28 mm vs 35 mm
  • Has an OLED screen: OLED vs LCD
  • Significantly wider aperture: f/3.9 vs f/4.8

Significant disadvantages of the S70 (vs the Slice)

  • None found

common strengths of the S70 and Slice

  • Very large screens: 3.5" vs 3.5"
  • Fairly small: Super compact (97×61×20 mm) vs Super compact (104×60×17 mm)
  • Good image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs
    1. Lens

Canon PowerShot SD40

Canon PowerShot SD40
3 years older
$249

Significant advantages of the SD40 (vs the Slice)

  • Much wider aperture: f/3.2 vs f/4.8

Significant disadvantages of the SD40 (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 1.8" vs 3.5"
  • No image stabilization: None vs
    1. Lens
  • Significantly worse wide angle: 38 mm vs 35 mm

common strengths of the SD40 and Slice

  • Fairly small: Super compact (96×45×24 mm) vs Super compact (104×60×17 mm)
  • Thin: 0.9" vs 0.7"

Nikon Coolpix P340

Nikon Coolpix P340
4 years newer
$506

Significant advantages of the P340 (vs the Slice)

  • Much wider aperture: f/1.8 vs f/4.8
  • Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 35 mm
  • Records high-speed movies: 240 fps vs None

Significant disadvantages of the P340 (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • Significantly larger: Compact (103×58×32 mm) vs Super compact (104×60×17 mm)
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the P340 and Slice

  • Larger than average screens: 3" vs 3.5"
  • Good image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs
    1. Lens

Olympus VG-180

Olympus VG-180
3 years newer
$99

Significant advantages of the VG-180 (vs the Slice)

  • Much better wide angle: 26 mm vs 35 mm
  • Much wider aperture: f/2.8 vs f/4.8

Significant disadvantages of the VG-180 (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.5"
  • Significantly larger: Compact (104×60×28 mm) vs Super compact (104×60×17 mm)
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the VG-180 and Slice

  • None found

Nikon Coolpix S80

Nikon Coolpix S80
8 months newer
$120

Significant advantages of the S80 (vs the Slice)

  • Significantly wider aperture: f/3.6 vs f/4.8
  • Has an OLED screen: OLED vs LCD
  • Supports 24p

Significant disadvantages of the S80 (vs the Slice)

  • Much slower max shutter speed: 1/1500 of a second vs 1/2000 of a second

common strengths of the S80 and Slice

  • Very large screens: 3.5" vs 3.5"
  • Fairly small: Super compact (99×63×17 mm) vs Super compact (104×60×17 mm)
  • Good image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs
    1. Lens

compared toUltra compact competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Kodak Slice compared to ultra compact competitors include: it has a much larger screen (3.5" vs 2.7"), has a touch screen, is newer (january 2010 vs august 2009) and has a faster max shutter speed (1/2000 of a second vs 1/1200 of a second).

However, on average it has a significantly narrower aperture (f/4.8 vs f/3.2), records lower quality movies (848 x 480 @ 30fps vs 720p @ 30fps), has a CCD-family sensor (CCD vs CMOS) and doesn't have a viewfinder (none vs tunnel).

Kodak EasyShare M590

Kodak EasyShare M590
7 months newer
$119

Significant advantages of the M590 (vs the Slice)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the M590 (vs the Slice)

  • None found

common strengths of the M590 and Slice

  • None found

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX1

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX1
5 months older
$229

Significant advantages of the DSC-TX1 (vs the Slice)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-TX1 (vs the Slice)

  • None found

common strengths of the DSC-TX1 and Slice

  • None found

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900
10 months older
$600

Significant advantages of the DSC-T900 (vs the Slice)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-T900 (vs the Slice)

  • None found

common strengths of the DSC-T900 and Slice

  • None found

Canon PowerShot SD780 IS

Canon PowerShot SD780 IS
10 months older
$220

Significant advantages of the SD780 IS (vs the Slice)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the SD780 IS (vs the Slice)

  • None found

common strengths of the SD780 IS and Slice

  • None found

compared toEntry-level DSLR competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Kodak Slice compared to entry-level DSLR competitors include: it has a much larger screen (3.5" vs 2.5"), has image stabilization (lens vs none), has a touch screen, is much smaller (super compact (104×60×17 mm) vs professional size (133×100×79 mm)) and is significantly less expensive ($221.99 vs $669.00).

However, on average it records lower quality movies (848 x 480 @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps), takes much lower resolution photos (9.7 MP vs 17.9 MP), doesn't record movies in 24p, doesn't shoot as fast continuously (3 fps vs 4 fps) and doesn't have a screen which flips out.

Canon Rebel T4i

Canon Rebel T4i
2 years newer
$841 (body only)
$669 18-55mm lens

Significant advantages of the T4i (vs the Slice)

  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs 848 x 480 @ 30fps
  • Has a viewfinder: Pentamirror vs None
  • Supports 24p

Significant disadvantages of the T4i (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • No image stabilization: None vs
    1. Lens
  • Much thicker: 3.1" vs 0.7"

common strengths of the T4i and Slice

  • Have touch screens

Canon EOS Digital Rebel XS

Canon EOS Digital Rebel XS
1 year older
$476 18-55mm lens

Significant advantages of the Rebel XS (vs the Slice)

  • Has a viewfinder: Pentamirror vs None
  • Shoots RAW
  • Has interchangeable lenses

Significant disadvantages of the Rebel XS (vs the Slice)

  • Does not take movies: None vs 848 x 480 @ 30fps
  • Much smaller screen: 2.5" vs 3.5"
  • No image stabilization: None vs
    1. Lens

common strengths of the Rebel XS and Slice

  • Fairly small: Prosumer size (126×98×65 mm) vs Super compact (104×60×17 mm)
  • Very thin: 2.6" vs 0.7"
  • Light weight: 502 g vs 158 g

Nikon D3200

Nikon D3200
2 years newer
$389 (body only)
$390 18-55mm lens

Significant advantages of the D3200 (vs the Slice)

  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs 848 x 480 @ 30fps
  • Has a viewfinder: Pentamirror vs None
  • Much higher true resolution: 24.1 MP vs 9.7 MP

Significant disadvantages of the D3200 (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • No image stabilization: None vs
    1. Lens
  • Much thicker: 3" vs 0.7"

common strengths of the D3200 and Slice

  • Light weight: 505 g vs 158 g
  • Inexpensive: $389.00 vs $221.99

compared toSuper zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Kodak Slice compared to super zoom competitors include: it has a much larger screen (3.5" vs 3"), is significantly smaller (super compact (104×60×17 mm) vs professional size (116×84×103 mm)), has better image stabilization (lens vs sensor shift), has a touch screen and is thinner (0.7" vs 4.1").

However, on average it has a significantly narrower aperture (f/4.8 vs f/3.5), has significantly less zoom (5x vs 40x), has a much narrower wide angle lens (35 mm vs 23 mm), doesn't record high-speed movies (none vs 240 fps) and doesn't have a screen which flips out.

Canon PowerShot SX410 IS

Canon PowerShot SX410 IS
5 years newer
$70

Significant advantages of the SX410 IS (vs the Slice)

  • Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 35 mm
  • Significantly wider aperture: f/3.5 vs f/4.8
  • Significantly more zoom: 40x vs 5x

Significant disadvantages of the SX410 IS (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen
  • Larger: Standard size (104×69×85 mm) vs Super compact (104×60×17 mm)

common strengths of the SX410 IS and Slice

  • Fairly small: Standard size (104×69×85 mm) vs Super compact (104×60×17 mm)
  • Light weight: 325 g vs 158 g
  • Thin: 3.3" vs 0.7"

Nikon Coolpix P500

Nikon Coolpix P500
1 year newer
$499

Significant advantages of the P500 (vs the Slice)

  • Records high-speed movies: 240 fps vs None
  • Much better wide angle: 23 mm vs 35 mm
  • Significantly wider aperture: f/3.5 vs f/4.8

Significant disadvantages of the P500 (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • Significantly larger: Professional size (116×84×103 mm) vs Super compact (104×60×17 mm)
  • Worse image stabilization:
    1. Sensor shift
    vs
    1. Lens

common strengths of the P500 and Slice

  • Light weight: 481 g vs 158 g

compared toTravel zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Kodak Slice compared to travel zoom competitors include: it has a much larger screen (3.5" vs 3"), is slightly smaller (super compact (104×60×17 mm) vs compact (101×60×26 mm)), has a touch screen, is thinner (0.7" vs 1") and has a faster max shutter speed (1/2000 of a second vs 1/1400 of a second).

However, on average it has a much narrower wide angle lens (35 mm vs 28 mm) and records lower quality movies (848 x 480 @ 30fps vs 720p @ 30fps).

Kodak EasyShare M580

Kodak EasyShare M580
similar age
$159

Significant advantages of the M580 (vs the Slice)

  • Much better wide angle: 28 mm vs 35 mm

Significant disadvantages of the M580 (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen
  • Larger: Compact (101×60×26 mm) vs Super compact (104×60×17 mm)

common strengths of the M580 and Slice

  • Larger than average screens: 3" vs 3.5"
  • Fairly small: Compact (101×60×26 mm) vs Super compact (104×60×17 mm)
  • Thin: 1" vs 0.7"

compared toDigicam competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Kodak Slice compared to digicam competitors include: it has a much larger screen (3.5" vs 3"), has better image stabilization (lens vs sensor shift), has a touch screen and has a faster max shutter speed (1/2000 of a second vs 1/700 of a second).

However, on average it has a much narrower aperture (f/4.8 vs f/3), has a much narrower wide angle lens (35 mm vs 25 mm) and is older (january 2010 vs january 2012).

Olympus SZ-14

Olympus SZ-14
2 years newer
$248

Significant advantages of the SZ-14 (vs the Slice)

  • Much better wide angle: 25 mm vs 35 mm
  • Much wider aperture: f/3 vs f/4.8

Significant disadvantages of the SZ-14 (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • Much slower max shutter speed: 1/700 of a second vs 1/2000 of a second

common strengths of the SZ-14 and Slice

  • Inexpensive: $248.47 vs $221.99

Olympus SZ-11

Olympus SZ-11
1 year newer
$378

Significant advantages of the SZ-11 (vs the Slice)

  • Much wider aperture: f/3 vs f/4.8
  • Much better wide angle: 28 mm vs 35 mm

Significant disadvantages of the SZ-11 (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • Worse image stabilization:
    1. Sensor shift
    vs
    1. Lens
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the SZ-11 and Slice

  • None found