As well as being compared against other compacts, the Kodak Slice is also often compared to ultra compacts, entry-level DSLRs, travel zooms and super zooms. The Kodak Slice's top rivals come from Kodak (such as the EasyShare M590 and the EasyShare Touch M577) and Canon (such as the ELPH 310 HS and the Rebel T3i)

compared toCompact competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Kodak Slice compared to other compact competitors include: it has a much larger screen (3.5" vs 2.7"), has better image stabilization (lens vs digital), has a touch screen and is thinner (0.7" vs 1.1").

However, on average it has a much narrower aperture (f/4.8 vs f/2.8), has a slightly narrower wide angle lens (35 mm vs 28 mm), doesn't record movies in 24p, doesn't have an OLED screen (LCD vs OLED) and significantly worse macro focusing (10 cm vs 3 cm).

Fujifilm FinePix Z90

Fujifilm FinePix Z90
1 year newer
$97

Significant advantages of the Z90 (vs the Slice)

  • Significantly wider aperture: f/3.9 vs f/4.8
  • Significantly better wide angle: 28 mm vs 35 mm

Significant disadvantages of the Z90 (vs the Slice)

  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • Worse image stabilization: Digital vs Lens

common strengths of the Z90 and Slice

  • Fairly small: Super compact 95x56x20 mm vs Super compact 104x60x17 mm
  • Have touch screens
  • Thin: 0.8" vs 0.7"
arrow Compare the Fujifilm FinePix Z90 vs the Kodak Slice

Canon PowerShot S410

Placeholder
5 years older
$170

Significant advantages of the S410 (vs the Slice)

  • Much wider aperture: f/2.8 vs f/4.8
  • Much better macro capability: 5 cm vs 10 cm
  • Has a viewfinder: Tunnel vs None

Significant disadvantages of the S410 (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 1.5" vs 3.5"
  • No image stabilization: None vs Lens
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the S410 and Slice

  • Fairly small: Compact 87x57x28 mm vs Super compact 104x60x17 mm
arrow Compare the Canon PowerShot S410 vs the Kodak Slice

Nikon Coolpix S80

Nikon Coolpix S80
8 months newer
$163 - $229

Significant advantages of the S80 (vs the Slice)

  • Significantly wider aperture: f/3.6 vs f/4.8
  • Has an OLED screen: OLED vs LCD
  • Supports 24p

Significant disadvantages of the S80 (vs the Slice)

  • None found

common strengths of the S80 and Slice

  • Very large screens: 3.5" vs 3.5"
  • Fairly small: Super compact 99x63x17 mm vs Super compact 104x60x17 mm
  • Have touch screens
arrow Compare the Nikon Coolpix S80 vs the Kodak Slice

Olympus VG-160

Olympus VG-160
2 years newer
$112

Significant advantages of the VG-160 (vs the Slice)

  • Much wider aperture: f/2.8 vs f/4.8
  • Much better wide angle: 26 mm vs 35 mm
  • Much better macro capability: 2 cm vs 10 cm

Significant disadvantages of the VG-160 (vs the Slice)

  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen
  • Worse image stabilization: Digital vs Lens

common strengths of the VG-160 and Slice

  • Fairly small: Super compact 96x57x19 mm vs Super compact 104x60x17 mm
  • Thin: 0.7" vs 0.7"
arrow Compare the Olympus VG-160 vs the Kodak Slice

Canon PowerShot ELPH 110 HS

Canon PowerShot ELPH 110 HS
2 years newer
$214

Significant advantages of the ELPH 110 HS (vs the Slice)

  • Much wider aperture: f/2.7 vs f/4.8
  • Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 35 mm
  • Supports 24p

Significant disadvantages of the ELPH 110 HS (vs the Slice)

  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the ELPH 110 HS and Slice

  • Fairly small: Super compact 93x57x20 mm vs Super compact 104x60x17 mm
  • Thin: 0.8" vs 0.7"
arrow Compare the Canon PowerShot ELPH 110 HS vs the Kodak Slice

Canon PowerShot A3000 IS

Canon PowerShot A3000 IS
similar age

Significant advantages of the A3000 IS (vs the Slice)

  • Much wider aperture: f/2.7 vs f/4.8
  • Much better macro capability: 3 cm vs 10 cm

Significant disadvantages of the A3000 IS (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen
  • Larger: Compact 97x58x28 mm vs Super compact 104x60x17 mm

common strengths of the A3000 IS and Slice

  • None found
arrow Compare the Canon PowerShot A3000 IS vs the Kodak Slice

compared toUltra compact competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Kodak Slice compared to ultra compact competitors include: it has a significantly larger screen (3.5" vs 2.7"), has better image stabilization (lens vs digital), has a touch screen and is slightly less expensive ($199.99 vs $493.97).

However, on average it has a much narrower aperture (f/4.8 vs f/3.3), records lower quality movies (848 x 480 @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps), has a slightly narrower wide angle lens (35 mm vs 28 mm), has a CCD-family sensor (CCD vs CMOS) and lacks a built in HDR feature.

Kodak EasyShare M590

Kodak EasyShare M590
7 months newer

Significant advantages of the M590 (vs the Slice)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the M590 (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the M590 and Slice

  • Built-in flashes
  • Very good image stabilization: Lens vs Lens
  • Very thin: 0.6" vs 0.7"
arrow Compare the EasyShare M590 vs the Slice

Samsung ST95

Samsung ST95
1 year newer

Significant advantages of the ST95 (vs the Slice)

  • Much wider aperture: f/3.3 vs f/4.8
  • Much better wide angle: 26 mm vs 35 mm
  • Much better macro capability: 5 cm vs 10 cm

Significant disadvantages of the ST95 (vs the Slice)

  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • Worse image stabilization: Digital vs Lens

common strengths of the ST95 and Slice

  • Built-in flashes
  • Larger than average screens: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • Have touch screens
arrow Compare the Samsung ST95 vs the Kodak Slice

Kodak Easyshare M5370

Kodak Easyshare M5370
1 year newer
$120

Significant advantages of the M5370 (vs the Slice)

  • Significantly wider aperture: f/3.9 vs f/4.8
  • Significantly better wide angle: 28 mm vs 35 mm
  • Can create panoramas in-camera

Significant disadvantages of the M5370 (vs the Slice)

  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • Worse image stabilization: Digital vs Lens

common strengths of the M5370 and Slice

  • Built-in flashes
  • Larger than average screens: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • Have touch screens
arrow Compare the Easyshare M5370 vs the Slice

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX1

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX1
5 months older
$494

Significant advantages of the DSC-TX1 (vs the Slice)

  • Much wider aperture: f/3.5 vs f/4.8
  • Much better macro capability: 1 cm vs 10 cm
  • Has a CMOS-family sensor: CMOS vs CCD

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-TX1 (vs the Slice)

  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"

common strengths of the DSC-TX1 and Slice

  • Built-in flashes
  • Larger than average screens: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • Very good image stabilization: Lens vs Lens
arrow Compare the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX1 vs the Kodak Slice

Sony Cybershot DSC-WX30

Sony Cybershot DSC-WX30
1 year newer

Significant advantages of the DSC-WX30 (vs the Slice)

  • Much wider aperture: f/2.6 vs f/4.8
  • Much better wide angle: 25 mm vs 35 mm
  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs 848 x 480 @ 30fps

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-WX30 (vs the Slice)

  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"

common strengths of the DSC-WX30 and Slice

  • Built-in flashes
  • Larger than average screens: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • Very good image stabilization: Lens vs Lens
arrow Compare the Sony Cybershot DSC-WX30 vs the Kodak Slice

compared toEntry-level DSLR competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Kodak Slice compared to entry-level DSLR competitors include: it has a much larger screen (3.5" vs 3.0"), has image stabilization (lens vs none), has a touch screen, is much smaller (super compact 104x60x17 mm vs professional size 133x100x79 mm) and is slightly less expensive ($199.99 vs $596.95).

However, on average it records lower quality movies (848 x 480 @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 60fps), takes much lower resolution photos (9.7 MP vs 24.2 MP), doesn't record movies in 24p, doesn't shoot as fast continuously (3 fps vs 5 fps) and doesn't have a screen which flips out.

Canon Rebel T3i

Canon Rebel T3i
1 year newer
$499 - $699 (body only)
$200 - $729 18-55mm lens

Significant advantages of the T3i (vs the Slice)

  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs 848 x 480 @ 30fps
  • Much larger sensor: APS-C 22.3x14.9mm vs 1/2.3" 6.2x4.6mm
  • Has a viewfinder: Pentamirror vs None

Significant disadvantages of the T3i (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • Much larger: Professional size 133x99x79 mm vs Super compact 104x60x17 mm
  • No image stabilization: None vs Lens

common strengths of the T3i and Slice

  • Very inexpensive: $199.95 vs $199.99
arrow Compare the Canon Rebel T3i vs the Kodak Slice

Nikon D3200

Nikon D3200
2 years newer
$339 - $567 (body only)
$477 18-55mm lens

Significant advantages of the D3200 (vs the Slice)

  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs 848 x 480 @ 30fps
  • Much larger sensor: APS-C 23.2x15.4mm vs 1/2.3" 6.2x4.6mm
  • Has a viewfinder: Pentamirror vs None

Significant disadvantages of the D3200 (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • Much larger: Prosumer size 125x96x76 mm vs Super compact 104x60x17 mm
  • No image stabilization: None vs Lens

common strengths of the D3200 and Slice

  • Light weight: 505 g vs 158 g
  • Inexpensive: $339.00 vs $199.99
arrow Compare the Nikon D3200 vs the Kodak Slice

Nikon D3100

Nikon D3100
7 months newer
$278 (body only)
$427 - $440 18-55mm lens

Significant advantages of the D3100 (vs the Slice)

  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 24fps vs 848 x 480 @ 30fps
  • Much larger sensor: APS-C 23.1x15.4mm vs 1/2.3" 6.2x4.6mm
  • Has a viewfinder: Pentamirror vs None

Significant disadvantages of the D3100 (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • Much larger: Prosumer size 124x96x73 mm vs Super compact 104x60x17 mm
  • No image stabilization: None vs Lens

common strengths of the D3100 and Slice

  • Fairly small: Prosumer size 124x96x73 mm vs Super compact 104x60x17 mm
  • Thin: 2.9" vs 0.7"
  • Light weight: 505 g vs 158 g
arrow Compare the Nikon D3100 vs the Kodak Slice

Nikon D5300

Nikon D5300
3 years newer
$747 (body only)
$679 - $847 18-55mm lens

Significant advantages of the D5300 (vs the Slice)

  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 60fps vs 848 x 480 @ 30fps
  • Much larger sensor: APS-C 23.5x15.6mm vs 1/2.3" 6.2x4.6mm
  • Has a viewfinder: Pentamirror vs None

Significant disadvantages of the D5300 (vs the Slice)

  • Much larger: Prosumer size 124x99x76 mm vs Super compact 104x60x17 mm
  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.2" vs 3.5"
  • No image stabilization: None vs Lens

common strengths of the D5300 and Slice

  • Larger than average screens: 3.2" vs 3.5"
  • Light weight: 479 g vs 158 g
arrow Compare the Nikon D5300 vs the Kodak Slice

Nikon D3300

Nikon D3300
4 years newer
$597 18-55mm lens

Significant advantages of the D3300 (vs the Slice)

  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 60fps vs 848 x 480 @ 30fps
  • Much larger sensor: APS-C 23.5x15.6mm vs 1/2.3" 6.2x4.6mm
  • Has a viewfinder: Pentamirror vs None

Significant disadvantages of the D3300 (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • Much larger: Prosumer size 124x98x75 mm vs Super compact 104x60x17 mm
  • No image stabilization: None vs Lens

common strengths of the D3300 and Slice

  • Light weight: 430 g vs 158 g
arrow Compare the Nikon D3300 vs the Kodak Slice

Canon Rebel T5i

Canon Rebel T5i
3 years newer
$200 - $1,148 18-55mm lens

Significant advantages of the T5i (vs the Slice)

  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs 848 x 480 @ 30fps
  • Much larger sensor: APS-C 22.3x14.9mm vs 1/2.3" 6.2x4.6mm
  • Has a viewfinder: Pentamirror vs None

Significant disadvantages of the T5i (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • Much larger: Professional size 133x100x79 mm vs Super compact 104x60x17 mm
  • No image stabilization: None vs Lens

common strengths of the T5i and Slice

  • Have touch screens
  • Very inexpensive: $199.95 vs $199.99
arrow Compare the Canon Rebel T5i vs the Kodak Slice

compared toTravel zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Kodak Slice compared to travel zoom competitors include: it has a significantly larger screen (3.5" vs 3.0") and has a touch screen.

However, on average it has a much narrower wide angle lens (35 mm vs 25 mm), has a much narrower aperture (f/4.8 vs f/3.0), doesn't have a built-in GPS, records lower quality movies (848 x 480 @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps) and doesn't record high-speed movies (none vs 220 fps).

Canon ELPH 310 HS

Canon ELPH 310 HS
1 year newer
$199

Significant advantages of the 310 HS (vs the Slice)

  • Much wider aperture: f/3.0 vs f/4.8
  • Significantly better wide angle: 28 mm vs 35 mm
  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs 848 x 480 @ 30fps

Significant disadvantages of the 310 HS (vs the Slice)

  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the 310 HS and Slice

  • None found
arrow Compare the Canon ELPH 310 HS vs the Kodak Slice

Panasonic Lumix ZS25

Panasonic Lumix ZS25
3 years newer
$225 - $240

Significant advantages of the ZS25 (vs the Slice)

  • Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 35 mm
  • Much wider aperture: f/3.3 vs f/4.8
  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 60fps vs 848 x 480 @ 30fps

Significant disadvantages of the ZS25 (vs the Slice)

  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the ZS25 and Slice

  • None found
arrow Compare the Panasonic Lumix ZS25 vs the Kodak Slice

Panasonic Lumix ZS30

Panasonic Lumix ZS30
3 years newer
$480

Significant advantages of the ZS30 (vs the Slice)

  • Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 35 mm
  • Has a GPS
  • Much wider aperture: f/3.3 vs f/4.8

Significant disadvantages of the ZS30 (vs the Slice)

  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"

common strengths of the ZS30 and Slice

  • Have touch screens
arrow Compare the Panasonic Lumix ZS30 vs the Kodak Slice

Nikon Coolpix S9500

Nikon Coolpix S9500
3 years newer
$202

Significant advantages of the S9500 (vs the Slice)

  • Much better wide angle: 25 mm vs 35 mm
  • Has a GPS
  • Much wider aperture: f/3.4 vs f/4.8

Significant disadvantages of the S9500 (vs the Slice)

  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the S9500 and Slice

  • None found
arrow Compare the Nikon Coolpix S9500 vs the Kodak Slice

Canon PowerShot SX150 IS

Canon PowerShot SX150 IS
1 year newer
$120 - $250

Significant advantages of the SX150 IS (vs the Slice)

  • Much wider aperture: f/3.4 vs f/4.8
  • Significantly better wide angle: 28 mm vs 35 mm
  • Much better macro capability: 1 cm vs 10 cm

Significant disadvantages of the SX150 IS (vs the Slice)

  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the SX150 IS and Slice

  • None found
arrow Compare the Canon PowerShot SX150 IS vs the Kodak Slice

Panasonic Lumix ZS20

Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS20
2 years newer
$330 - $399

Significant advantages of the ZS20 (vs the Slice)

  • Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 35 mm
  • Has a GPS
  • Much wider aperture: f/3.3 vs f/4.8

Significant disadvantages of the ZS20 (vs the Slice)

  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"

common strengths of the ZS20 and Slice

  • Have touch screens
arrow Compare the Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS20 vs the Kodak Slice

compared toSuper zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Kodak Slice compared to super zoom competitors include: it has a significantly larger screen (3.5" vs 3.0"), is significantly smaller (super compact 104x60x17 mm vs professional size 125x84x102 mm), has a touch screen, is thinner (0.7" vs 3.6") and is significantly lighter (158 g vs 550 g).

However, on average it has a much narrower aperture (f/4.8 vs f/3.0), has significantly less zoom (5x vs 34.8x), records lower quality movies (848 x 480 @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps), has a much narrower wide angle lens (35 mm vs 23 mm) and doesn't record high-speed movies (none vs 240 fps).

Nikon Coolpix P520

Nikon Coolpix P520
3 years newer
$439

Significant advantages of the P520 (vs the Slice)

  • Much wider aperture: f/3.0 vs f/4.8
  • Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 35 mm
  • Significantly more zoom: 41.7x vs 5x

Significant disadvantages of the P520 (vs the Slice)

  • Much larger: Professional size 125x84x102 mm vs Super compact 104x60x17 mm
  • No touch screen
  • Smaller screen: 3.2" vs 3.5"

common strengths of the P520 and Slice

  • Larger than average screens: 3.2" vs 3.5"
arrow Compare the Nikon Coolpix P520 vs the Kodak Slice

Nikon Coolpix L820

Nikon Coolpix L820
3 years newer
$194 - $279

Significant advantages of the L820 (vs the Slice)

  • Much wider aperture: f/3.0 vs f/4.8
  • Much better wide angle: 23 mm vs 35 mm
  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs 848 x 480 @ 30fps

Significant disadvantages of the L820 (vs the Slice)

  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen
  • Significantly larger: Prosumer size 111x76x85 mm vs Super compact 104x60x17 mm

common strengths of the L820 and Slice

  • Fairly small: Prosumer size 111x76x85 mm vs Super compact 104x60x17 mm
  • Inexpensive: $194.00 vs $199.99
arrow Compare the Nikon Coolpix L820 vs the Kodak Slice

Kodak EashShare Z5120

Kodak EasyShare Z5120
2 years newer
$230

Significant advantages of the Z5120 (vs the Slice)

  • Much wider aperture: f/3.1 vs f/4.8
  • Much better wide angle: 26 mm vs 35 mm
  • Can create panoramas in-camera

Significant disadvantages of the Z5120 (vs the Slice)

  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen
  • Significantly larger: Prosumer size 116x78x76 mm vs Super compact 104x60x17 mm

common strengths of the Z5120 and Slice

  • Fairly small: Prosumer size 116x78x76 mm vs Super compact 104x60x17 mm
  • Thin: 3" vs 0.7"
arrow Compare the EashShare Z5120 vs the Slice

Nikon Coolpix L830

Nikon Coolpix L830
4 years newer
$197 - $227

Significant advantages of the L830 (vs the Slice)

  • Much wider aperture: f/3.0 vs f/4.8
  • Much better wide angle: 22 mm vs 35 mm
  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs 848 x 480 @ 30fps

Significant disadvantages of the L830 (vs the Slice)

  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • Significantly larger: Prosumer size 111x75x91 mm vs Super compact 104x60x17 mm
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the L830 and Slice

  • Fairly small: Prosumer size 111x75x91 mm vs Super compact 104x60x17 mm
  • Inexpensive: $196.95 vs $199.99
arrow Compare the Nikon Coolpix L830 vs the Kodak Slice