As well as being compared against other compacts, the Kodak Slice is also often compared to boutiques, ultra compacts, travel zooms and entry-level DSLRs. The Kodak Slice's top rivals come from Canon (such as the Rebel T4i and the PowerShot ELPH 110 HS) and Sony (such as the Cyber-shot DSC-R1 and the Cyber-shot DSC-TX1)

compared toCompact competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Kodak Slice compared to other compact competitors include: it has a much larger screen (3.5" vs 2.7"), has better image stabilization (lens vs none), has a touch screen and is thinner (0.7" vs 0.9").

However, on average it has a much narrower aperture (f/4.8 vs f/2.8), records lower quality movies (848 x 480 @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 24fps), has a significantly narrower wide angle lens (35 mm vs 28 mm), doesn't record high-speed movies (none vs 240 fps) and doesn't record movies in 24p.

Canon PowerShot ELPH 110 HS

Canon PowerShot ELPH 110 HS
2 years newer
$185

Significant advantages of the ELPH 110 HS (vs the Slice)

  • Much wider aperture: f/2.7 vs f/4.8
  • Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 35 mm
  • Supports 24p

Significant disadvantages of the ELPH 110 HS (vs the Slice)

  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the ELPH 110 HS and Slice

  • Fairly small: Super compact 93x57x20 mm vs Super compact 104x60x17 mm
  • Good image stabilization: Lens vs Lens
  • Thin: 0.8" vs 0.7"
arrow Compare the Canon PowerShot ELPH 110 HS vs the Kodak Slice

Canon PowerShot SD40

Canon PowerShot SD40
3 years older
$360

Significant advantages of the SD40 (vs the Slice)

  • Much wider aperture: f/3.2 vs f/4.8

Significant disadvantages of the SD40 (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 1.8" vs 3.5"
  • No image stabilization: None vs Lens
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the SD40 and Slice

  • Fairly small: Super compact 96x45x24 mm vs Super compact 104x60x17 mm
  • Thin: 0.9" vs 0.7"
arrow Compare the Canon PowerShot SD40 vs the Kodak Slice

Canon PowerShot SD1300 IS

Canon PowerShot SD1300 IS
similar age
$179

Significant advantages of the SD1300 IS (vs the Slice)

  • Much wider aperture: f/2.8 vs f/4.8
  • Significantly better wide angle: 28 mm vs 35 mm
  • Much better macro capability: 3 cm vs 10 cm

Significant disadvantages of the SD1300 IS (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the SD1300 IS and Slice

  • Fairly small: Super compact 91x56x22 mm vs Super compact 104x60x17 mm
  • Good image stabilization: Lens vs Lens
  • Thin: 0.9" vs 0.7"
arrow Compare the Canon PowerShot SD1300 IS vs the Kodak Slice

Canon ELPH 320 HS

Canon PowerShot ELPH 320 HS
2 years newer
$159 - $250

Significant advantages of the 320 HS (vs the Slice)

  • Much wider aperture: f/2.7 vs f/4.8
  • Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 35 mm
  • Supports 24p

Significant disadvantages of the 320 HS (vs the Slice)

  • None found

common strengths of the 320 HS and Slice

  • Larger than average screens: 3.2" vs 3.5"
  • Fairly small: Super compact 94x57x21 mm vs Super compact 104x60x17 mm
  • Good image stabilization: Lens vs Lens
arrow Compare the Canon PowerShot ELPH 320 HS vs the Kodak Slice

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W370

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W370
similar age
$170

Significant advantages of the DSC-W370 (vs the Slice)

  • Significantly wider aperture: f/3.6 vs f/4.8

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-W370 (vs the Slice)

  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen
  • Thicker: 1" vs 0.7"

common strengths of the DSC-W370 and Slice

  • Good image stabilization: Lens vs Lens
arrow Compare the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W370 vs the Kodak Slice

Canon ELPH 300 HS

Canon ELPH 300 HS
1 year newer
$220

Significant advantages of the 300 HS (vs the Slice)

  • Much wider aperture: f/2.7 vs f/4.8
  • Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 35 mm
  • Supports 24p

Significant disadvantages of the 300 HS (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the 300 HS and Slice

  • Fairly small: Super compact 92x55x19 mm vs Super compact 104x60x17 mm
  • Good image stabilization: Lens vs Lens
  • Thin: 0.8" vs 0.7"
arrow Compare the Canon ELPH 300 HS vs the Kodak Slice

compared toBoutique competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Kodak Slice compared to boutique competitors include: it has a much larger screen (3.5" vs 2.0"), is much smaller (super compact 104x60x17 mm vs large 139x168x97 mm), has image stabilization (lens vs none), has a touch screen and is newer (january, 2010 vs september, 2005).

However, on average it has a much narrower aperture (f/4.8 vs f/2.8), has a significantly narrower wide angle lens (35 mm vs 24 mm), has a significantly smaller sensor (1/2.3" 6.2x4.6mm vs sigma x3 21.5x14.4mm), doesn't shoot RAW and has a CCD-family sensor (CCD vs CMOS).

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-R1

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-R1
4 years older

Significant advantages of the DSC-R1 (vs the Slice)

  • Much wider aperture: f/2.8 vs f/4.8
  • Significantly better wide angle: 24 mm vs 35 mm
  • Shoots RAW

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-R1 (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 2.0" vs 3.5"
  • Much larger: Large 139x168x97 mm vs Super compact 104x60x17 mm
  • Much heavier: 995 g vs 158 g

common strengths of the DSC-R1 and Slice

  • Great zoom: 5x vs 5x
arrow Compare the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-R1 vs the Kodak Slice

compared toUltra compact competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Kodak Slice compared to ultra compact competitors include: it has a significantly larger screen (3.5" vs 2.7") and has a touch screen.

However, on average it has a much narrower aperture (f/4.8 vs f/3.2), records lower quality movies (848 x 480 @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 24fps), has a significantly narrower wide angle lens (35 mm vs 28 mm), doesn't record movies in 24p and has a CCD-family sensor (CCD vs CMOS).

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX1

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX1
5 months older
$200

Significant advantages of the DSC-TX1 (vs the Slice)

  • Much wider aperture: f/3.5 vs f/4.8
  • Much better macro capability: 1 cm vs 10 cm
  • Has a CMOS-family sensor: CMOS vs CCD

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-TX1 (vs the Slice)

  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"

common strengths of the DSC-TX1 and Slice

  • Built-in flashes
  • Larger than average screens: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • Very good image stabilization: Lens vs Lens
arrow Compare the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX1 vs the Kodak Slice

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX20

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX20
2 years newer
$210

Significant advantages of the DSC-TX20 (vs the Slice)

  • Much wider aperture: f/3.5 vs f/4.8
  • Much better wide angle: 25 mm vs 35 mm
  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 60fps vs 848 x 480 @ 30fps

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-TX20 (vs the Slice)

  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"

common strengths of the DSC-TX20 and Slice

  • Built-in flashes
  • Larger than average screens: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • Very good image stabilization: Lens vs Lens
arrow Compare the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX20 vs the Kodak Slice

Canon PowerShot ELPH 520 HS

Canon ELPH 520 HS
2 years newer
$150 - $189

Significant advantages of the ELPH 520 HS (vs the Slice)

  • Much wider aperture: f/3.4 vs f/4.8
  • Significantly better wide angle: 28 mm vs 35 mm
  • Supports 24p

Significant disadvantages of the ELPH 520 HS (vs the Slice)

  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the ELPH 520 HS and Slice

  • Built-in flashes
  • Larger than average screens: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • Very good image stabilization: Lens vs Lens
arrow Compare the Canon ELPH 520 HS vs the Kodak Slice

Kodak EasyShare M590

Kodak EasyShare M590
7 months newer
$128

Significant advantages of the M590 (vs the Slice)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the M590 (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the M590 and Slice

  • Built-in flashes
  • Very good image stabilization: Lens vs Lens
  • Very thin: 0.6" vs 0.7"
arrow Compare the EasyShare M590 vs the Slice

Sony Cyber-shot WX50

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX50
2 years newer
$195

Significant advantages of the WX50 (vs the Slice)

  • Much wider aperture: f/2.6 vs f/4.8
  • Much better wide angle: 25 mm vs 35 mm
  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 60fps vs 848 x 480 @ 30fps

Significant disadvantages of the WX50 (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the WX50 and Slice

  • Built-in flashes
  • Very good image stabilization: Lens vs Lens
  • Thin: 0.7" vs 0.7"
arrow Compare the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX50 vs the Kodak Slice

Nikon Coolpix S3100

Nikon Coolpix S3100
1 year newer
$119

Significant advantages of the S3100 (vs the Slice)

  • Much wider aperture: f/3.2 vs f/4.8
  • Much better wide angle: 26 mm vs 35 mm
  • Can create panoramas in-camera

Significant disadvantages of the S3100 (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the S3100 and Slice

  • Built-in flashes
  • Good image stabilization: Sensor shift vs Lens
  • Thin: 0.7" vs 0.7"
arrow Compare the Nikon Coolpix S3100 vs the Kodak Slice

compared toTravel zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Kodak Slice compared to travel zoom competitors include: it has a significantly larger screen (3.5" vs 2.7"), is significantly smaller (super compact 104x60x17 mm vs compact 105x58x33 mm), has a touch screen, is thinner (0.7" vs 1.2") and is slightly lighter (158 g vs 205 g).

However, on average it has significantly less zoom (5x vs 20x), has a much narrower wide angle lens (35 mm vs 25 mm), has a much narrower aperture (f/4.8 vs f/3.3), doesn't have a built-in GPS and records lower quality movies (848 x 480 @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps).

Panasonic Lumix ZS30

Panasonic Lumix ZS30
3 years newer
$319

Significant advantages of the ZS30 (vs the Slice)

  • Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 35 mm
  • Has a GPS
  • Much wider aperture: f/3.3 vs f/4.8

Significant disadvantages of the ZS30 (vs the Slice)

  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • Significantly larger: Compact 105x59x28 mm vs Super compact 104x60x17 mm
  • Significantly thicker: 1.1" vs 0.7"

common strengths of the ZS30 and Slice

  • Have touch screens
arrow Compare the Panasonic Lumix ZS30 vs the Kodak Slice

Canon PowerShot ELPH 140 IS

Canon PowerShot ELPH 140 IS
4 years newer
$119 - $162

Significant advantages of the ELPH 140 IS (vs the Slice)

  • Much wider aperture: f/3.2 vs f/4.8
  • Significantly better wide angle: 28 mm vs 35 mm
  • Much better macro capability: 1 cm vs 10 cm

Significant disadvantages of the ELPH 140 IS (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the ELPH 140 IS and Slice

  • Fairly small: Super compact 95x54x22 mm vs Super compact 104x60x17 mm
  • Thin: 0.9" vs 0.7"
  • Light weight: 130 g vs 158 g
arrow Compare the Canon PowerShot ELPH 140 IS vs the Kodak Slice

Panasonic Lumix ZS15

Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS15
2 years newer
$445

Significant advantages of the ZS15 (vs the Slice)

  • Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 35 mm
  • Much wider aperture: f/3.3 vs f/4.8
  • More zoom: 16x vs 5x

Significant disadvantages of the ZS15 (vs the Slice)

  • Significantly larger: Compact 105x58x33 mm vs Super compact 104x60x17 mm
  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the ZS15 and Slice

  • None found
arrow Compare the Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS15 vs the Kodak Slice

Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS10

Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS10
1 year newer
$300 - $310

Significant advantages of the DMC-ZS10 (vs the Slice)

  • Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 35 mm
  • Has a GPS
  • Much wider aperture: f/3.3 vs f/4.8

Significant disadvantages of the DMC-ZS10 (vs the Slice)

  • Significantly larger: Compact 105x58x33 mm vs Super compact 104x60x17 mm
  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • Much thicker: 1.3" vs 0.7"

common strengths of the DMC-ZS10 and Slice

  • Have touch screens
arrow Compare the Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS10 vs the Kodak Slice

Nikon Coolpix S9500

Nikon Coolpix S9500
3 years newer
$221

Significant advantages of the S9500 (vs the Slice)

  • Much better wide angle: 25 mm vs 35 mm
  • Has a GPS
  • Much more zoom: 22x vs 5x

Significant disadvantages of the S9500 (vs the Slice)

  • Significantly larger: Compact 110x60x31 mm vs Super compact 104x60x17 mm
  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the S9500 and Slice

  • None found
arrow Compare the Nikon Coolpix S9500 vs the Kodak Slice

Canon PowerShot SX270 HS

Canon PowerShot SX270 HS
3 years newer
$515

Significant advantages of the SX270 HS (vs the Slice)

  • Much better wide angle: 25 mm vs 35 mm
  • Much wider aperture: f/3.5 vs f/4.8
  • Significantly more zoom: 20x vs 5x

Significant disadvantages of the SX270 HS (vs the Slice)

  • Much larger: Compact 106x63x33 mm vs Super compact 104x60x17 mm
  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the SX270 HS and Slice

  • None found
arrow Compare the Canon PowerShot SX270 HS vs the Kodak Slice

compared toEntry-level DSLR competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Kodak Slice compared to entry-level DSLR competitors include: it has a much larger screen (3.5" vs 3.0"), has image stabilization (lens vs none), has a touch screen, is much smaller (super compact 104x60x17 mm vs professional size 133x99x79 mm) and is much less expensive ($104.95 vs $525.00).

However, on average it records lower quality movies (848 x 480 @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps), takes much lower resolution photos (9.7 MP vs 17.9 MP), doesn't record movies in 24p, doesn't shoot as fast continuously (3 fps vs 5 fps) and doesn't have a screen which flips out.

Canon Rebel T4i

Canon Rebel T4i
2 years newer
$525 - $700 (body only)
$845 - $950 18-135mm lens

Significant advantages of the T4i (vs the Slice)

  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs 848 x 480 @ 30fps
  • Much larger sensor: APS-C 22.3x14.9mm vs 1/2.3" 6.2x4.6mm
  • Has a viewfinder: Pentamirror vs None

Significant disadvantages of the T4i (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • Much larger: Professional size 133x99x78 mm vs Super compact 104x60x17 mm
  • No image stabilization: None vs Lens

common strengths of the T4i and Slice

  • Have touch screens
arrow Compare the Canon Rebel T4i vs the Kodak Slice

Canon Rebel T3i

Canon Rebel T3i
1 year newer
$499 - $774 (body only)
$549 - $575 18-55mm lens

Significant advantages of the T3i (vs the Slice)

  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs 848 x 480 @ 30fps
  • Much larger sensor: APS-C 22.3x14.9mm vs 1/2.3" 6.2x4.6mm
  • Has a viewfinder: Pentamirror vs None

Significant disadvantages of the T3i (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • Much larger: Professional size 133x99x79 mm vs Super compact 104x60x17 mm
  • No image stabilization: None vs Lens

common strengths of the T3i and Slice

  • None found
arrow Compare the Canon Rebel T3i vs the Kodak Slice