As well as being compared against other compacts, the Kodak Slice is also often compared to entry-level DSLRs, travel zooms, super zooms and ultra compacts. The Kodak Slice's top rivals come from Canon (such as the Rebel T4i and the PowerShot SX410 IS) and Kodak (such as the EasyShare Z915 and the EasyShare M580)
Generally, some of the advantages of the Kodak Slice compared to other compact competitors include: it has a significantly larger screen (3.5" vs 3"), has better image stabilization (lens vs digital) and is thinner (0.7" vs 0.8").
However, on average it has a significantly narrower aperture (f/4.8 vs f/3.9), records lower quality movies (848 x 480 @ 30fps vs 720p @ 30fps), has a much narrower wide angle lens (35 mm vs 28 mm), doesn't have an OLED screen (LCD vs OLED) and is older (january 2010 vs february 2011).
Generally, some of the advantages of the Kodak Slice compared to entry-level DSLR competitors include: it has a much larger screen (3.5" vs 3"), has image stabilization (lens vs none), has a touch screen, is much smaller (super compact (104×60×17 mm) vs professional size (133×100×79 mm)) and is thinner (0.7" vs 3.1").
However, on average it records lower quality movies (848 x 480 @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps), takes much lower resolution photos (9.7 MP vs 24.1 MP), doesn't record movies in 24p, doesn't shoot as fast continuously (3 fps vs 5 fps) and doesn't have a screen which flips out.
Generally, some of the advantages of the Kodak Slice compared to travel zoom competitors include: it has a much larger screen (3.5" vs 2.5"), is significantly smaller (super compact (104×60×17 mm) vs compact (90×64×39 mm)), has a touch screen, is newer (january 2010 vs january 2009) and is thinner (0.7" vs 1.5").
However, on average it has a significantly narrower wide angle lens (35 mm vs 28 mm) and has a significantly narrower aperture (f/4.8 vs f/3.5).
Generally, some of the advantages of the Kodak Slice compared to super zoom competitors include: it has a much larger screen (3.5" vs 3"), is slightly smaller (super compact (104×60×17 mm) vs standard size (104×69×85 mm)), has a touch screen, is thinner (0.7" vs 3.3") and is slightly lighter (158 g vs 325 g).
However, on average it has a significantly narrower aperture (f/4.8 vs f/3.5), has significantly less zoom (5x vs 40x), has a much narrower wide angle lens (35 mm vs 24 mm), is older (january 2010 vs february 2015) and has a slower max shutter speed (1/2000 of a second vs 1/4000 of a second).
Generally, some of the advantages of the Kodak Slice compared to ultra compact competitors include: it has a much larger screen (3.5" vs 2.5"), has a touch screen, is newer (january 2010 vs february 2009) and has a faster max shutter speed (1/2000 of a second vs 1/1000 of a second).
However, on average it has a much narrower aperture (f/4.8 vs f/3.2), records lower quality movies (848 x 480 @ 30fps vs 720p @ 30fps) and doesn't have a viewfinder (none vs tunnel).
