As well as being compared against other compacts, the Kodak Slice is also often compared to travel zooms, entry-level DSLRs and ultra compacts. The Kodak Slice's top rivals come from Nikon (such as the Coolpix P340) and Kodak (such as the EasyShare Z915)

compared toCompact competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Kodak Slice compared to other compact competitors include: it has a much larger screen (3.5" vs 1.8"), is slightly smaller (super compact (104×60×17 mm) vs compact (103×58×32 mm)), has better image stabilization (lens vs none), has a touch screen and is thinner (0.7" vs 1.3").

However, on average it has a much narrower aperture (f/4.8 vs f/1.8), records lower quality movies (848 x 480 @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps), has a much narrower wide angle lens (35 mm vs 28 mm), doesn't record high-speed movies (none vs 240 fps) and has a CCD-family sensor (CCD vs CMOS).

Nikon Coolpix P340

Nikon Coolpix P340
4 years newer

Significant advantages of the P340 (vs the Slice)

  • Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 35 mm
  • Much wider aperture: f/1.8 vs f/4.8
  • Records high-speed movies: 240 fps vs None

Significant disadvantages of the P340 (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • Significantly larger: Compact (103×58×32 mm) vs Super compact (104×60×17 mm)
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the P340 and Slice

  • None found

Canon PowerShot SD40

Canon PowerShot SD40
3 years older
$179

Significant advantages of the SD40 (vs the Slice)

  • Significantly wider aperture: f/3.2 vs f/4.8

Significant disadvantages of the SD40 (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 1.8" vs 3.5"
  • No image stabilization: None vs
    1. Lens
  • Significantly worse wide angle: 38 mm vs 35 mm

common strengths of the SD40 and Slice

  • Fairly small: Super compact (96×45×24 mm) vs Super compact (104×60×17 mm)
  • Thin: 0.9" vs 0.7"
  • Light weight: 120 g vs 158 g

Canon PowerShot A2200

Canon PowerShot A2200
1 year newer
$190

Significant advantages of the A2200 (vs the Slice)

  • Much better wide angle: 28 mm vs 35 mm
  • Much wider aperture: f/2.8 vs f/4.8

Significant disadvantages of the A2200 (vs the Slice)

  • No image stabilization: None vs
    1. Lens
  • Much smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the A2200 and Slice

  • Fairly small: Super compact (94×56×23 mm) vs Super compact (104×60×17 mm)
  • Thin: 0.9" vs 0.7"
  • Light weight: 135 g vs 158 g

compared toTravel zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Kodak Slice compared to travel zoom competitors include: it has a much larger screen (3.5" vs 2.5"), is much smaller (super compact (104×60×17 mm) vs compact (90×64×39 mm)), has a touch screen, is newer (january 2010 vs january 2009) and is thinner (0.7" vs 1.5").

However, on average it has a significantly narrower aperture (f/4.8 vs f/3.5).

Kodak EasyShare Z915

Kodak EasyShare Z915
1 year older
$220

Significant advantages of the Z915 (vs the Slice)

  • Significantly wider aperture: f/3.5 vs f/4.8

Significant disadvantages of the Z915 (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 2.5" vs 3.5"
  • Much larger: Compact (90×64×39 mm) vs Super compact (104×60×17 mm)
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the Z915 and Slice

  • None found

compared toEntry-level DSLR competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Kodak Slice compared to entry-level DSLR competitors include: it has a much larger screen (3.5" vs 3"), has image stabilization (lens vs none), is much smaller (super compact (104×60×17 mm) vs professional size (133×100×79 mm)), is significantly less expensive ($199.99 vs $550.00) and is thinner (0.7" vs 3.1").

However, on average it records lower quality movies (848 x 480 @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps), takes much lower resolution photos (9.7 MP vs 17.9 MP), doesn't record movies in 24p, doesn't shoot as fast continuously (3 fps vs 5 fps) and doesn't have a screen which flips out.

Canon Rebel T4i

Canon Rebel T4i
2 years newer
$699 (body only)
$550 18-55mm lens

Significant advantages of the T4i (vs the Slice)

  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs 848 x 480 @ 30fps
  • Has a viewfinder: Pentamirror vs None
  • Supports 24p

Significant disadvantages of the T4i (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • Much thicker: 3.1" vs 0.7"
  • No image stabilization: None vs
    1. Lens

common strengths of the T4i and Slice

  • Have touch screens
  • Inexpensive: $550.00 vs $199.99

compared toUltra compact competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Kodak Slice compared to ultra compact competitors include: it has a much larger screen (3.5" vs 2.5"), has a touch screen, is newer (january 2010 vs february 2009) and has a faster max shutter speed (1/2000 of a second vs 1/1500 of a second).

However, on average it has a significantly narrower aperture (f/4.8 vs f/3.2), records lower quality movies (848 x 480 @ 30fps vs 720p @ 30fps), has a slightly narrower wide angle lens (35 mm vs 33 mm), doesn't have a viewfinder (none vs tunnel) and slightly shorter exposures (8 seconds vs 15 seconds).

Canon PowerShot SD780 IS

Canon PowerShot SD780 IS
10 months older
$339

Significant advantages of the SD780 IS (vs the Slice)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the SD780 IS (vs the Slice)

  • None found

common strengths of the SD780 IS and Slice

  • None found