As well as being compared against other compacts, the Kodak Slice is also often compared to ultra compacts, waterproofs, travel zooms, entry-level DSLRs and super zooms. The Kodak Slice's top rivals come from Nikon (such as the Coolpix S80 and the Coolpix S3100) and Samsung (such as the ST95 and the HZ30W)

compared toCompact competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Kodak Slice compared to other compact competitors include: it has a slightly larger screen (3.5" vs 3.0") and has a touch screen.

However, on average it has a much narrower aperture (f/4.8 vs f/2.8), records lower quality movies (848 x 480 @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 24fps), has a significantly narrower wide angle lens (35 mm vs 28 mm), doesn't record high-speed movies (none vs 240 fps) and doesn't record movies in 24p.

Nikon Coolpix S80

Nikon Coolpix S80
8 months newer
$170 - $210

Significant advantages of the S80 (vs the Slice)

  • Significantly wider aperture: f/3.6 vs f/4.8
  • Has an OLED screen: OLED vs LCD
  • Supports 24p

Significant disadvantages of the S80 (vs the Slice)

  • None found

common strengths of the S80 and Slice

  • Very large screens: 3.5" vs 3.5"
  • Fairly small: Super compact 99x63x17 mm vs Super compact 104x60x17 mm
  • Have touch screens
arrow Compare the Nikon Coolpix S80 vs the Kodak Slice

Canon ELPH 300 HS

Canon ELPH 300 HS
1 year newer
$235

Significant advantages of the 300 HS (vs the Slice)

  • Much wider aperture: f/2.7 vs f/4.8
  • Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 35 mm
  • Supports 24p

Significant disadvantages of the 300 HS (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the 300 HS and Slice

  • Fairly small: Super compact 92x55x19 mm vs Super compact 104x60x17 mm
  • Thin: 0.8" vs 0.7"
arrow Compare the Canon ELPH 300 HS vs the Kodak Slice

Fujifilm FinePix Z90

Fujifilm FinePix Z90
1 year newer
$167

Significant advantages of the Z90 (vs the Slice)

  • Significantly wider aperture: f/3.9 vs f/4.8
  • Significantly better wide angle: 28 mm vs 35 mm

Significant disadvantages of the Z90 (vs the Slice)

  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • Worse image stabilization: Digital vs Lens

common strengths of the Z90 and Slice

  • Fairly small: Super compact 95x56x20 mm vs Super compact 104x60x17 mm
  • Have touch screens
  • Thin: 0.8" vs 0.7"
arrow Compare the Fujifilm FinePix Z90 vs the Kodak Slice

Canon PowerShot ELPH 110 HS

Canon PowerShot ELPH 110 HS
2 years newer
$200

Significant advantages of the ELPH 110 HS (vs the Slice)

  • Much wider aperture: f/2.7 vs f/4.8
  • Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 35 mm
  • Supports 24p

Significant disadvantages of the ELPH 110 HS (vs the Slice)

  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the ELPH 110 HS and Slice

  • Fairly small: Super compact 93x57x20 mm vs Super compact 104x60x17 mm
  • Thin: 0.8" vs 0.7"
arrow Compare the Canon PowerShot ELPH 110 HS vs the Kodak Slice

Canon ELPH 100 HS

Canon ELPH 100 HS
1 year newer
$110 - $180

Significant advantages of the 100 HS (vs the Slice)

  • Much wider aperture: f/2.8 vs f/4.8
  • Significantly better wide angle: 28 mm vs 35 mm
  • Supports 24p

Significant disadvantages of the 100 HS (vs the Slice)

  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the 100 HS and Slice

  • Fairly small: Super compact 93x55x19 mm vs Super compact 104x60x17 mm
  • Thin: 0.8" vs 0.7"
arrow Compare the Canon ELPH 100 HS vs the Kodak Slice

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T300

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T300
1 year older

Significant advantages of the DSC-T300 (vs the Slice)

  • Much wider aperture: f/3.5 vs f/4.8
  • Much better macro capability: 1 cm vs 10 cm

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-T300 (vs the Slice)

  • None found

common strengths of the DSC-T300 and Slice

  • Very large screens: 3.5" vs 3.5"
  • Fairly small: Super compact 94x59x21 mm vs Super compact 104x60x17 mm
  • Have touch screens
arrow Compare the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T300 vs the Kodak Slice

compared toUltra compact competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Kodak Slice compared to ultra compact competitors include: it has a much larger screen (3.5" vs 2.7"), has better image stabilization (lens vs sensor shift) and has a touch screen.

However, on average it has a much narrower aperture (f/4.8 vs f/2.8), records lower quality movies (848 x 480 @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 60fps), has a significantly narrower wide angle lens (35 mm vs 26 mm), slightly lower maximum light sensitivity (3,200 ISO vs 6,400 ISO) and lacks a built in HDR feature.

Samsung ST95

Samsung ST95
1 year newer

Significant advantages of the ST95 (vs the Slice)

  • Much wider aperture: f/3.3 vs f/4.8
  • Much better wide angle: 26 mm vs 35 mm
  • Much better macro capability: 5 cm vs 10 cm

Significant disadvantages of the ST95 (vs the Slice)

  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • Worse image stabilization: Digital vs Lens

common strengths of the ST95 and Slice

  • Each has a built-in flash
  • Larger than average screens: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • Have touch screens
arrow Compare the Samsung ST95 vs the Kodak Slice

Nikon Coolpix S3100

Nikon Coolpix S3100
1 year newer
$131

Significant advantages of the S3100 (vs the Slice)

  • Much wider aperture: f/3.2 vs f/4.8
  • Much better wide angle: 26 mm vs 35 mm
  • Can create panoramas in-camera

Significant disadvantages of the S3100 (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the S3100 and Slice

  • Each has a built-in flash
  • Good image stabilization: Sensor shift vs Lens
  • Thin: 0.7" vs 0.7"
arrow Compare the Nikon Coolpix S3100 vs the Kodak Slice

Panasonic Lumix DMC-XS1

Panasonic Lumix DMC-XS1
3 years newer
$86

Significant advantages of the DMC-XS1 (vs the Slice)

  • Much wider aperture: f/2.8 vs f/4.8
  • Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 35 mm
  • Can create panoramas in-camera

Significant disadvantages of the DMC-XS1 (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the DMC-XS1 and Slice

  • Each has a built-in flash
  • Very good image stabilization: Lens vs Lens
  • Very thin: 0.7" vs 0.7"
arrow Compare the Panasonic Lumix DMC-XS1 vs the Kodak Slice

Kodak EasyShare M590

Kodak EasyShare M590
7 months newer

Significant advantages of the M590 (vs the Slice)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the M590 (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the M590 and Slice

  • Each has a built-in flash
  • Very good image stabilization: Lens vs Lens
  • Very thin: 0.6" vs 0.7"
arrow Compare the EasyShare M590 vs the Slice

Sony Cyber-shot WX50

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX50
2 years newer
$150

Significant advantages of the WX50 (vs the Slice)

  • Much wider aperture: f/2.6 vs f/4.8
  • Much better wide angle: 25 mm vs 35 mm
  • Takes 3D photos

Significant disadvantages of the WX50 (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the WX50 and Slice

  • Each has a built-in flash
  • Very good image stabilization: Lens vs Lens
  • Thin: 0.7" vs 0.7"
arrow Compare the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX50 vs the Kodak Slice

Kodak Easyshare M5370

Kodak Easyshare M5370
1 year newer

Significant advantages of the M5370 (vs the Slice)

  • Significantly wider aperture: f/3.9 vs f/4.8
  • Significantly better wide angle: 28 mm vs 35 mm
  • Can create panoramas in-camera

Significant disadvantages of the M5370 (vs the Slice)

  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • Worse image stabilization: Digital vs Lens

common strengths of the M5370 and Slice

  • Each has a built-in flash
  • Larger than average screens: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • Have touch screens
arrow Compare the Easyshare M5370 vs the Slice

compared toWaterproof competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Kodak Slice compared to waterproof competitors include: it has a much larger screen (3.5" vs 2.7"), takes significantly higher resolution photos (9.7 MP vs 6 MP), has a touch screen, has a marginally larger sensor (1/2.3" 6.2x4.6mm vs 1/3" 4.8x3.6mm) and is thinner (0.7" vs 1.7").

However, on average it has a much narrower aperture (f/4.8 vs f/3.3), records lower quality movies (848 x 480 @ 30fps vs 720p @ 30fps), has a significantly narrower wide angle lens (35 mm vs 29 mm), much worse macro focusing (10 cm vs 5 cm) and is older (january, 2010 vs january, 2013).

Nikon Coolpix S31

Nikon Coolpix S31
3 years newer
$120

Significant advantages of the S31 (vs the Slice)

  • Much wider aperture: f/3.3 vs f/4.8
  • Significantly better wide angle: 29 mm vs 35 mm
  • Much better macro capability: 5 cm vs 10 cm

Significant disadvantages of the S31 (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen
  • Significantly lower true resolution: 6 MP vs 9.7 MP

common strengths of the S31 and Slice

  • Each has a built-in flash
arrow Compare the Nikon Coolpix S31 vs the Kodak Slice

compared toTravel zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Kodak Slice compared to travel zoom competitors include: it has a significantly larger screen (3.5" vs 2.7"), is slightly smaller (super compact 104x60x17 mm vs compact 105x59x28 mm), has a touch screen and is thinner (0.7" vs 1.1").

However, on average it has slightly less zoom (5x vs 16x), has a much narrower wide angle lens (35 mm vs 24 mm), has a much narrower aperture (f/4.8 vs f/3.0), doesn't have a built-in GPS and records lower quality movies (848 x 480 @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps).

Olympus SZ-20

Olympus SZ-20
1 year newer
$240

Significant advantages of the SZ-20 (vs the Slice)

  • Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 35 mm
  • Much wider aperture: f/3.0 vs f/4.8
  • Much better macro capability: 1 cm vs 10 cm

Significant disadvantages of the SZ-20 (vs the Slice)

  • Significantly larger: Compact 102x64x30 mm vs Super compact 104x60x17 mm
  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the SZ-20 and Slice

  • None found
arrow Compare the Olympus SZ-20 vs the Kodak Slice

Canon PowerShot ELPH 140 IS

Canon PowerShot ELPH 140 IS
4 years newer
$114 - $164

Significant advantages of the ELPH 140 IS (vs the Slice)

  • Much wider aperture: f/3.2 vs f/4.8
  • Significantly better wide angle: 28 mm vs 35 mm
  • Much better macro capability: 1 cm vs 10 cm

Significant disadvantages of the ELPH 140 IS (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the ELPH 140 IS and Slice

  • Very small: Super compact 95x54x22 mm vs Super compact 104x60x17 mm
  • Thin: 0.9" vs 0.7"
  • Light weight: 130 g vs 158 g
arrow Compare the Canon PowerShot ELPH 140 IS vs the Kodak Slice

Canon ELPH 310 HS

Canon ELPH 310 HS
1 year newer

Significant advantages of the 310 HS (vs the Slice)

  • Much wider aperture: f/3.0 vs f/4.8
  • Significantly better wide angle: 28 mm vs 35 mm
  • Much better macro capability: 1 cm vs 10 cm

Significant disadvantages of the 310 HS (vs the Slice)

  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the 310 HS and Slice

  • Fairly small: Super compact 96x57x22 mm vs Super compact 104x60x17 mm
  • Thin: 0.9" vs 0.7"
  • Light weight: 140 g vs 158 g
arrow Compare the Canon ELPH 310 HS vs the Kodak Slice

Panasonic Lumix ZS20

Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS20
2 years newer
$300 - $399

Significant advantages of the ZS20 (vs the Slice)

  • Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 35 mm
  • Much wider aperture: f/3.3 vs f/4.8
  • Has a GPS

Significant disadvantages of the ZS20 (vs the Slice)

  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • Significantly larger: Compact 105x59x28 mm vs Super compact 104x60x17 mm
  • Significantly thicker: 1.1" vs 0.7"

common strengths of the ZS20 and Slice

  • Have touch screens
arrow Compare the Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS20 vs the Kodak Slice

Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS10

Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS10
1 year newer
$300 - $335

Significant advantages of the DMC-ZS10 (vs the Slice)

  • Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 35 mm
  • Much wider aperture: f/3.3 vs f/4.8
  • Has a GPS

Significant disadvantages of the DMC-ZS10 (vs the Slice)

  • Significantly larger: Compact 105x58x33 mm vs Super compact 104x60x17 mm
  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • Much thicker: 1.3" vs 0.7"

common strengths of the DMC-ZS10 and Slice

  • Have touch screens
arrow Compare the Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS10 vs the Kodak Slice

Panasonic Lumix ZS30

Panasonic Lumix ZS30
3 years newer
$269 - $319

Significant advantages of the ZS30 (vs the Slice)

  • Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 35 mm
  • Much wider aperture: f/3.3 vs f/4.8
  • Has a GPS

Significant disadvantages of the ZS30 (vs the Slice)

  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • Significantly larger: Compact 105x59x28 mm vs Super compact 104x60x17 mm
  • Significantly thicker: 1.1" vs 0.7"

common strengths of the ZS30 and Slice

  • Have touch screens
arrow Compare the Panasonic Lumix ZS30 vs the Kodak Slice

compared toEntry-level DSLR competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Kodak Slice compared to entry-level DSLR competitors include: it has a much larger screen (3.5" vs 2.5"), has image stabilization (lens vs none), has a touch screen, is much smaller (super compact 104x60x17 mm vs professional size 133x99x78 mm) and is thinner (0.7" vs 3.1").

However, on average it records lower quality movies (848 x 480 @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps), takes significantly lower resolution photos (9.7 MP vs 17.9 MP), doesn't record movies in 24p, doesn't shoot as fast continuously (3 fps vs 5 fps) and doesn't have a screen which flips out.

Canon Rebel T3i

Canon Rebel T3i
1 year newer
$499 - $648 (body only)
$200 - $579 18-55mm lens

Significant advantages of the T3i (vs the Slice)

  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs 848 x 480 @ 30fps
  • Much larger sensor: APS-C 22.3x14.9mm vs 1/2.3" 6.2x4.6mm
  • Has a viewfinder: Pentamirror vs None

Significant disadvantages of the T3i (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • Much larger: Professional size 133x99x79 mm vs Super compact 104x60x17 mm
  • No image stabilization: None vs Lens

common strengths of the T3i and Slice

  • None found
arrow Compare the Canon Rebel T3i vs the Kodak Slice

Canon Rebel T5i

Canon Rebel T5i
3 years newer
$200 18-55mm lens

Significant advantages of the T5i (vs the Slice)

  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs 848 x 480 @ 30fps
  • Much larger sensor: APS-C 22.3x14.9mm vs 1/2.3" 6.2x4.6mm
  • Has a viewfinder: Pentamirror vs None

Significant disadvantages of the T5i (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • Much larger: Professional size 133x100x79 mm vs Super compact 104x60x17 mm
  • No image stabilization: None vs Lens

common strengths of the T5i and Slice

  • Have touch screens
arrow Compare the Canon Rebel T5i vs the Kodak Slice

Canon Rebel T4i

Canon Rebel T4i
2 years newer
$700 (body only)
$200 - $725 18-55mm lens

Significant advantages of the T4i (vs the Slice)

  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs 848 x 480 @ 30fps
  • Much larger sensor: APS-C 22.3x14.9mm vs 1/2.3" 6.2x4.6mm
  • Has a viewfinder: Pentamirror vs None

Significant disadvantages of the T4i (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • Much larger: Professional size 133x99x78 mm vs Super compact 104x60x17 mm
  • No image stabilization: None vs Lens

common strengths of the T4i and Slice

  • Have touch screens
arrow Compare the Canon Rebel T4i vs the Kodak Slice

Nikon D40X

Nikon D40X
2 years older

Significant advantages of the D40X (vs the Slice)

  • Much larger sensor: APS-C 23.7x15.6mm vs 1/2.3" 6.2x4.6mm
  • Has a viewfinder: Pentamirror vs None
  • Shoots RAW

Significant disadvantages of the D40X (vs the Slice)

  • Does not take movies: None vs 848 x 480 @ 30fps
  • Much smaller screen: 2.5" vs 3.5"
  • Much larger: Prosumer size 124x94x64 mm vs Super compact 104x60x17 mm

common strengths of the D40X and Slice

  • Very small: Prosumer size 124x94x64 mm vs Super compact 104x60x17 mm
  • Very thin: 2.5" vs 0.7"
  • Light weight: 522 g vs 158 g
arrow Compare the Nikon D40X vs the Kodak Slice

compared toSuper zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Kodak Slice compared to super zoom competitors include: it has a significantly larger screen (3.5" vs 3.0"), is significantly smaller (super compact 104x60x17 mm vs professional size 125x84x102 mm), has a touch screen, is thinner (0.7" vs 4") and is significantly lighter (158 g vs 550 g).

However, on average it has a much narrower aperture (f/4.8 vs f/3.0), has significantly less zoom (5x vs 41.7x), records lower quality movies (848 x 480 @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 60fps), has a much narrower wide angle lens (35 mm vs 23 mm) and doesn't record high-speed movies (none vs 240 fps).

Nikon Coolpix P520

Nikon Coolpix P520
3 years newer
$429

Significant advantages of the P520 (vs the Slice)

  • Much wider aperture: f/3.0 vs f/4.8
  • Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 35 mm
  • Significantly more zoom: 41.7x vs 5x

Significant disadvantages of the P520 (vs the Slice)

  • Much larger: Professional size 125x84x102 mm vs Super compact 104x60x17 mm
  • No touch screen
  • Much thicker: 4" vs 0.7"

common strengths of the P520 and Slice

  • Larger than average screens: 3.2" vs 3.5"
arrow Compare the Nikon Coolpix P520 vs the Kodak Slice

Nikon Coolpix L820

Nikon Coolpix L820
3 years newer
$168 - $279

Significant advantages of the L820 (vs the Slice)

  • Much wider aperture: f/3.0 vs f/4.8
  • Much better wide angle: 23 mm vs 35 mm
  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs 848 x 480 @ 30fps

Significant disadvantages of the L820 (vs the Slice)

  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen
  • Significantly larger: Prosumer size 111x76x85 mm vs Super compact 104x60x17 mm

common strengths of the L820 and Slice

  • Fairly small: Prosumer size 111x76x85 mm vs Super compact 104x60x17 mm
arrow Compare the Nikon Coolpix L820 vs the Kodak Slice