As well as being compared against other compacts, the Kodak Slice is also often compared to entry-level DSLRs, travel zooms, ultra compacts and super zooms. The Kodak Slice's top rivals come from Canon (such as the Rebel T3i and the EOS Rebel T5) and Nikon (such as the Coolpix S80 and the Coolpix S70)

compared toCompact competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Kodak Slice compared to other compact competitors include: it has a much larger screen (3.5" vs 1.8"), has better image stabilization (lens vs digital), has a touch screen, is thinner (0.7" vs 0.9") and has a faster max shutter speed (1/2000 of a second vs 1/1600 of a second).

However, on average it has a significantly narrower aperture (f/4.8 vs f/3.2), records lower quality movies (848 x 480 @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps), has a much narrower wide angle lens (35 mm vs 28 mm), doesn't record high-speed movies (none vs 240 fps) and doesn't record movies in 24p.

Nikon Coolpix S80

Nikon Coolpix S80
8 months newer
$149

Significant advantages of the S80 (vs the Slice)

  • Significantly wider aperture: f/3.6 vs f/4.8
  • Has an OLED screen: OLED vs LCD
  • Supports 24p

Significant disadvantages of the S80 (vs the Slice)

  • Much slower max shutter speed: 1/1500 of a second vs 1/2000 of a second

common strengths of the S80 and Slice

  • Very large screens: 3.5" vs 3.5"
  • Very small: Super compact (99×63×17 mm) vs Super compact (104×60×17 mm)
  • Good image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs
    1. Lens

Nikon Coolpix S70

Nikon Coolpix S70
5 months older
$140

Significant advantages of the S70 (vs the Slice)

  • Much better wide angle: 28 mm vs 35 mm
  • Has an OLED screen: OLED vs LCD
  • Wider aperture: f/3.9 vs f/4.8

Significant disadvantages of the S70 (vs the Slice)

  • None found

common strengths of the S70 and Slice

  • Very large screens: 3.5" vs 3.5"
  • Fairly small: Super compact (97×61×20 mm) vs Super compact (104×60×17 mm)
  • Good image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs
    1. Lens

Nikon Coolpix P340

Nikon Coolpix P340
4 years newer
$904

Significant advantages of the P340 (vs the Slice)

  • Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 35 mm
  • Much wider aperture: f/1.8 vs f/4.8
  • Records high-speed movies: 240 fps vs None

Significant disadvantages of the P340 (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • Significantly larger: Compact (103×58×32 mm) vs Super compact (104×60×17 mm)
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the P340 and Slice

  • Larger than average screens: 3" vs 3.5"
  • Good image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs
    1. Lens

Fujifilm FinePix Z90

Fujifilm FinePix Z90
1 year newer
$159

Significant advantages of the Z90 (vs the Slice)

  • Much better wide angle: 28 mm vs 35 mm
  • Wider aperture: f/3.9 vs f/4.8

Significant disadvantages of the Z90 (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • Worse image stabilization:
    1. Digital
    vs
    1. Lens

common strengths of the Z90 and Slice

  • Larger than average screens: 3" vs 3.5"
  • Fairly small: Super compact (95×57×20 mm) vs Super compact (104×60×17 mm)
  • Have touch screens

Canon PowerShot SD40

Canon PowerShot SD40
3 years older
$179

Significant advantages of the SD40 (vs the Slice)

  • Much wider aperture: f/3.2 vs f/4.8

Significant disadvantages of the SD40 (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 1.8" vs 3.5"
  • No image stabilization: None vs
    1. Lens
  • Significantly worse wide angle: 38 mm vs 35 mm

common strengths of the SD40 and Slice

  • Very small: Super compact (96×45×24 mm) vs Super compact (104×60×17 mm)
  • Thin: 0.9" vs 0.7"
  • Light weight: 120 g vs 158 g

compared toEntry-level DSLR competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Kodak Slice compared to entry-level DSLR competitors include: it has a much larger screen (3.5" vs 3"), has image stabilization (lens vs none), has a touch screen, is much smaller (super compact (104×60×17 mm) vs professional size (133×100×79 mm)) and is slightly less expensive ($199.99 vs $825.25).

However, on average it records lower quality movies (848 x 480 @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps), takes much lower resolution photos (9.7 MP vs 18 MP), doesn't record movies in 24p, doesn't shoot as fast continuously (3 fps vs 5 fps) and doesn't have a screen which flips out.

Canon Rebel T3i

Canon Rebel T3i
1 year newer
$499 (body only)
$752 18-135mm lens

Significant advantages of the T3i (vs the Slice)

  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs 848 x 480 @ 30fps
  • Has a viewfinder: Pentamirror vs None
  • Supports 24p

Significant disadvantages of the T3i (vs the Slice)

  • No image stabilization: None vs
    1. Lens
  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • Much larger: Professional size (133×100×80 mm) vs Super compact (104×60×17 mm)

common strengths of the T3i and Slice

  • None found

Canon EOS Rebel T5

Canon EOS Rebel T5
4 years newer
$349 (body only)
$399 - $420 18-55mm lens

Significant advantages of the Rebel T5 (vs the Slice)

  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs 848 x 480 @ 30fps
  • Has a viewfinder: Pentamirror vs None
  • Supports 24p

Significant disadvantages of the Rebel T5 (vs the Slice)

  • No image stabilization: None vs
    1. Lens
  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • Much larger: Professional size (130×100×78 mm) vs Super compact (104×60×17 mm)

common strengths of the Rebel T5 and Slice

  • Light weight: 480 g vs 158 g
  • Inexpensive: $349.00 vs $199.99

Canon Rebel T4i

Canon Rebel T4i
2 years newer
$825 18-55mm lens

Significant advantages of the T4i (vs the Slice)

  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs 848 x 480 @ 30fps
  • Has a viewfinder: Pentamirror vs None
  • Supports 24p

Significant disadvantages of the T4i (vs the Slice)

  • No image stabilization: None vs
    1. Lens
  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • Much larger: Professional size (133×100×79 mm) vs Super compact (104×60×17 mm)

common strengths of the T4i and Slice

  • Have touch screens

compared toTravel zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Kodak Slice compared to travel zoom competitors include: it has a much larger screen (3.5" vs 2.5"), is significantly smaller (super compact (104×60×17 mm) vs compact (90×64×39 mm)), has a touch screen and is thinner (0.7" vs 1.5").

However, on average it has a much narrower wide angle lens (35 mm vs 28 mm), has a significantly narrower aperture (f/4.8 vs f/3.2) and is older (january 2010 vs february 2014).

Canon PowerShot ELPH 140 IS

Canon PowerShot ELPH 140 IS
4 years newer

Significant advantages of the ELPH 140 IS (vs the Slice)

  • Much better wide angle: 28 mm vs 35 mm
  • Much wider aperture: f/3.2 vs f/4.8

Significant disadvantages of the ELPH 140 IS (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the ELPH 140 IS and Slice

  • Very small: Super compact (95×54×22 mm) vs Super compact (104×60×17 mm)
  • Very thin: 0.9" vs 0.7"
  • Light weight: 130 g vs 158 g

Kodak EasyShare Z915

Kodak EasyShare Z915
1 year older
$207

Significant advantages of the Z915 (vs the Slice)

  • Significantly wider aperture: f/3.5 vs f/4.8

Significant disadvantages of the Z915 (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 2.5" vs 3.5"
  • Much larger: Compact (90×64×39 mm) vs Super compact (104×60×17 mm)
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the Z915 and Slice

  • Light weight: 194 g vs 158 g

compared toUltra compact competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Kodak Slice compared to ultra compact competitors include: it has a much larger screen (3.5" vs 2.5"), has a touch screen and has a faster max shutter speed (1/2000 of a second vs 1/1200 of a second).

However, on average it has a much narrower aperture (f/4.8 vs f/3.2), records lower quality movies (848 x 480 @ 30fps vs 720p @ 30fps), has a slightly narrower wide angle lens (35 mm vs 33 mm), doesn't have a viewfinder (none vs tunnel) and slightly shorter exposures (8 seconds vs 15 seconds).

Canon PowerShot SD780 IS

Canon PowerShot SD780 IS
10 months older

Significant advantages of the SD780 IS (vs the Slice)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the SD780 IS (vs the Slice)

  • None found

common strengths of the SD780 IS and Slice

  • None found

Kodak EasyShare M590

Kodak EasyShare M590
7 months newer
$113

Significant advantages of the M590 (vs the Slice)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the M590 (vs the Slice)

  • None found

common strengths of the M590 and Slice

  • None found

compared toSuper zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Kodak Slice compared to super zoom competitors include: it has a much larger screen (3.5" vs 3"), is slightly smaller (super compact (104×60×17 mm) vs standard size (104×69×85 mm)), has a touch screen, is thinner (0.7" vs 3.3") and is slightly lighter (158 g vs 325 g).

However, on average it has a significantly narrower aperture (f/4.8 vs f/3.5), has significantly less zoom (5x vs 40x), has a much narrower wide angle lens (35 mm vs 24 mm), is older (january 2010 vs february 2015) and has a slower max shutter speed (1/2000 of a second vs 1/4000 of a second).

Canon PowerShot SX410 IS

Canon PowerShot SX410 IS
5 years newer
$192

Significant advantages of the SX410 IS (vs the Slice)

  • Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 35 mm
  • Significantly wider aperture: f/3.5 vs f/4.8
  • Significantly more zoom: 40x vs 5x

Significant disadvantages of the SX410 IS (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen
  • Significantly thicker: 3.3" vs 0.7"

common strengths of the SX410 IS and Slice

  • Fairly small: Standard size (104×69×85 mm) vs Super compact (104×60×17 mm)
  • Very light: 325 g vs 158 g
  • Thin: 3.3" vs 0.7"