Generally, some of the advantages of the Kodak Slice compared to super zoom competitors include: it has a much larger screen (3.5" vs 3"), is slightly smaller (super compact (104×60×17 mm) vs standard size (104×69×85 mm)), has a touch screen, is thinner (0.7" vs 3.3") and is slightly lighter (158 g vs 325 g).
However, on average it has a significantly narrower aperture (f/4.8 vs f/3.5), has significantly less zoom (5x vs 40x), has a much narrower wide angle lens (35 mm vs 24 mm), is older (january 2010 vs february 2015) and has a slower max shutter speed (1/2000 of a second vs 1/4000 of a second).
Canon PowerShot SX410 IS
5 years newer
$180
Significant advantages of the SX410 IS (vs the Slice)
- Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 35 mm
- Significantly wider aperture: f/3.5 vs f/4.8
- Significantly more zoom: 40x vs 5x
Significant disadvantages of the SX410 IS (vs the Slice)
- Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
- No touch screen
- Significantly thicker: 3.3" vs 0.7"
common strengths of the SX410 IS and Slice
- Fairly small: Standard size (104×69×85 mm) vs Super compact (104×60×17 mm)
- Light weight: 325 g vs 158 g
- Thin: 3.3" vs 0.7"