As well as being compared against other compacts, the Kodak Slice is also often compared to travel zooms, super zooms, entry-level DSLRs and ultra compacts. The Kodak Slice's top rivals come from Canon (such as the Rebel T5i and the EOS Rebel T6s) and Panasonic (such as the Lumix ZS25 and the Lumix ZS30)

compared toCompact competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Kodak Slice compared to other compact competitors include: it has a much larger screen (3.5" vs 3"), is slightly smaller (super compact (104×60×17 mm) vs compact (100×59×29 mm)), has a touch screen, is thinner (0.7" vs 1.1") and is slightly less expensive ($140.99 vs $349.00).

However, on average it has a much narrower aperture (f/4.8 vs f/1.8), records lower quality movies (848 x 480 @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 24fps), has a much narrower wide angle lens (35 mm vs 24 mm), doesn't record high-speed movies (none vs 240 fps) and has a CCD-family sensor (CCD vs CMOS).

Fujifilm FinePix Z90

Fujifilm FinePix Z90
1 year newer
$115

Significant advantages of the Z90 (vs the Slice)

  • Much better wide angle: 28 mm vs 35 mm
  • Significantly wider aperture: f/3.9 vs f/4.8

Significant disadvantages of the Z90 (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • Worse image stabilization:
    1. Digital
    vs
    1. Lens

common strengths of the Z90 and Slice

  • Larger than average screens: 3" vs 3.5"
  • Fairly small: Super compact (95×57×20 mm) vs Super compact (104×60×17 mm)
  • Have touch screens

Nikon Coolpix P310

Nikon Coolpix P310
2 years newer
$349

Significant advantages of the P310 (vs the Slice)

  • Much wider aperture: f/1.8 vs f/4.8
  • Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 35 mm
  • Has a CMOS-family sensor: CMOS vs CCD

Significant disadvantages of the P310 (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen
  • Significantly larger: Compact (103×58×32 mm) vs Super compact (104×60×17 mm)

common strengths of the P310 and Slice

  • Larger than average screens: 3" vs 3.5"
  • Good image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs
    1. Lens

Canon PowerShot S120

Canon PowerShot S120
3 years newer
$576

Significant advantages of the S120 (vs the Slice)

  • Much wider aperture: f/1.8 vs f/4.8
  • Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 35 mm
  • Records high-speed movies: 240 fps vs None

Significant disadvantages of the S120 (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • Significantly larger: Compact (100×59×29 mm) vs Super compact (104×60×17 mm)
  • Significantly thicker: 1.1" vs 0.7"

common strengths of the S120 and Slice

  • Larger than average screens: 3" vs 3.5"
  • Good image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs
    1. Lens
  • Have touch screens

Nikon Coolpix P340

Nikon Coolpix P340
4 years newer
$539

Significant advantages of the P340 (vs the Slice)

  • Much wider aperture: f/1.8 vs f/4.8
  • Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 35 mm
  • Records high-speed movies: 240 fps vs None

Significant disadvantages of the P340 (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen
  • Significantly larger: Compact (103×58×32 mm) vs Super compact (104×60×17 mm)

common strengths of the P340 and Slice

  • Larger than average screens: 3" vs 3.5"
  • Good image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs
    1. Lens

Canon ELPH 320 HS

Canon PowerShot ELPH 320 HS
2 years newer
$175

Significant advantages of the 320 HS (vs the Slice)

  • Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 35 mm
  • Records high-speed movies: 240 fps vs None
  • Much wider aperture: f/2.7 vs f/4.8

Significant disadvantages of the 320 HS (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 3.2" vs 3.5"

common strengths of the 320 HS and Slice

  • Very large screens: 3.2" vs 3.5"
  • Fairly small: Super compact (94×57×21 mm) vs Super compact (104×60×17 mm)
  • Good image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs
    1. Lens

Canon PowerShot SD3500 IS

Canon PowerShot SD3500 IS
similar age
$190

Significant advantages of the SD3500 IS (vs the Slice)

  • Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 35 mm
  • Much wider aperture: f/2.8 vs f/4.8
  • Significantly faster max shutter speed: 1/3000 of a second vs 1/2000 of a second

Significant disadvantages of the SD3500 IS (vs the Slice)

  • None found

common strengths of the SD3500 IS and Slice

  • Very large screens: 3.5" vs 3.5"
  • Fairly small: Super compact (99×56×22 mm) vs Super compact (104×60×17 mm)
  • Good image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs
    1. Lens

compared toTravel zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Kodak Slice compared to travel zoom competitors include: it has a much larger screen (3.5" vs 3"), is significantly smaller (super compact (104×60×17 mm) vs compact (105×58×33 mm)), has a touch screen, is thinner (0.7" vs 1.3") and is slightly lighter (158 g vs 208 g).

However, on average it has significantly less zoom (5x vs 20x), has a much narrower wide angle lens (35 mm vs 24 mm), has a much narrower aperture (f/4.8 vs f/3.3), doesn't have a built-in GPS and records lower quality movies (848 x 480 @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 60fps).

Panasonic Lumix ZS25

Panasonic Lumix ZS25
3 years newer
$239

Significant advantages of the ZS25 (vs the Slice)

  • Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 35 mm
  • Records high-speed movies: 220 fps vs None
  • Much wider aperture: f/3.3 vs f/4.8

Significant disadvantages of the ZS25 (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen
  • Significantly larger: Compact (105×59×28 mm) vs Super compact (104×60×17 mm)

common strengths of the ZS25 and Slice

  • Fairly small: Compact (105×59×28 mm) vs Super compact (104×60×17 mm)
  • Thin: 1.1" vs 0.7"
  • Light weight: 193 g vs 158 g

Panasonic Lumix ZS30

Panasonic Lumix ZS30
3 years newer
$210

Significant advantages of the ZS30 (vs the Slice)

  • Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 35 mm
  • Records high-speed movies: 220 fps vs None
  • Much wider aperture: f/3.3 vs f/4.8

Significant disadvantages of the ZS30 (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • Significantly larger: Compact (105×59×28 mm) vs Super compact (104×60×17 mm)
  • Significantly thicker: 1.1" vs 0.7"

common strengths of the ZS30 and Slice

  • Fairly small: Compact (105×59×28 mm) vs Super compact (104×60×17 mm)
  • Have touch screens
  • Thin: 1.1" vs 0.7"

Panasonic Lumix ZS15

Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS15
2 years newer
$78

Significant advantages of the ZS15 (vs the Slice)

  • Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 35 mm
  • Much wider aperture: f/3.3 vs f/4.8
  • Has a CMOS-family sensor: CMOS vs CCD

Significant disadvantages of the ZS15 (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • Much larger: Compact (105×58×33 mm) vs Super compact (104×60×17 mm)
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the ZS15 and Slice

  • Inexpensive: $77.99 vs $140.99

Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS10

Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS10
1 year newer
$610

Significant advantages of the DMC-ZS10 (vs the Slice)

  • Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 35 mm
  • Records high-speed movies: 220 fps vs None
  • Much wider aperture: f/3.3 vs f/4.8

Significant disadvantages of the DMC-ZS10 (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • Much larger: Compact (105×58×33 mm) vs Super compact (104×60×17 mm)
  • Much thicker: 1.3" vs 0.7"

common strengths of the DMC-ZS10 and Slice

  • Have touch screens

Canon ELPH 310 HS

Canon ELPH 310 HS
1 year newer
$329

Significant advantages of the 310 HS (vs the Slice)

  • Much better wide angle: 28 mm vs 35 mm
  • Records high-speed movies: 240 fps vs None
  • Much wider aperture: f/3 vs f/4.8

Significant disadvantages of the 310 HS (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the 310 HS and Slice

  • Very small: Super compact (96×57×22 mm) vs Super compact (104×60×17 mm)
  • Very thin: 0.9" vs 0.7"
  • Light weight: 140 g vs 158 g

Nikon Coolpix S9700

Nikon Coolpix S9700
4 years newer
$295

Significant advantages of the S9700 (vs the Slice)

  • Much better wide angle: 25 mm vs 35 mm
  • Records high-speed movies: 240 fps vs None
  • Much more zoom: 30x vs 5x

Significant disadvantages of the S9700 (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • Much larger: Compact (110×64×35 mm) vs Super compact (104×60×17 mm)
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the S9700 and Slice

  • None found

compared toSuper zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Kodak Slice compared to super zoom competitors include: it has a much larger screen (3.5" vs 3"), is significantly smaller (super compact (104×60×17 mm) vs prosumer size (114×89×96 mm)), has a touch screen, is thinner (0.7" vs 3.8") and is significantly lighter (158 g vs 538 g).

However, on average it has a much narrower aperture (f/4.8 vs f/3), has much less zoom (5x vs 41.7x), has a much narrower wide angle lens (35 mm vs 23 mm), doesn't record high-speed movies (none vs 120 fps) and doesn't have a screen which flips out.

Nikon Coolpix L830

Nikon Coolpix L830
4 years newer
$169

Significant advantages of the L830 (vs the Slice)

  • Much better wide angle: 22 mm vs 35 mm
  • Much wider aperture: f/3 vs f/4.8
  • Records high-speed movies: 240 fps vs None

Significant disadvantages of the L830 (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • Significantly larger: Prosumer size (111×76×91 mm) vs Super compact (104×60×17 mm)
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the L830 and Slice

  • Fairly small: Prosumer size (111×76×91 mm) vs Super compact (104×60×17 mm)
  • Light weight: 508 g vs 158 g
  • Inexpensive: $169.00 vs $140.99

Nikon Coolpix L840

Nikon Coolpix L840
5 years newer
$188 - $229

Significant advantages of the L840 (vs the Slice)

  • Much better wide angle: 23 mm vs 35 mm
  • Much wider aperture: f/3 vs f/4.8
  • Significantly more zoom: 37.2x vs 5x

Significant disadvantages of the L840 (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • Significantly larger: Prosumer size (114×89×96 mm) vs Super compact (104×60×17 mm)
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the L840 and Slice

  • Light weight: 538 g vs 158 g
  • Inexpensive: $188.00 vs $140.99

Kodak PixPro AZ521

Kodak PixPro AZ521
3 years newer
$281

Significant advantages of the AZ521 (vs the Slice)

  • Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 35 mm
  • Much wider aperture: f/2.9 vs f/4.8
  • Much more zoom: 52x vs 5x

Significant disadvantages of the AZ521 (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • Significantly larger: Prosumer size (119×86×98 mm) vs Super compact (104×60×17 mm)
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the AZ521 and Slice

  • Inexpensive: $280.60 vs $140.99

Nikon Coolpix P530

Nikon Coolpix P530
4 years newer
$200 - $210

Significant advantages of the P530 (vs the Slice)

  • Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 35 mm
  • Much wider aperture: f/3 vs f/4.8
  • Much more zoom: 41.7x vs 5x

Significant disadvantages of the P530 (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • Significantly larger: Professional size (123×84×98 mm) vs Super compact (104×60×17 mm)
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the P530 and Slice

  • Light weight: 494 g vs 158 g
  • Inexpensive: $199.95 vs $140.99

Nikon Coolpix P520

Nikon Coolpix P520
3 years newer
$380

Significant advantages of the P520 (vs the Slice)

  • Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 35 mm
  • Much wider aperture: f/3 vs f/4.8
  • Much more zoom: 41.7x vs 5x

Significant disadvantages of the P520 (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 3.2" vs 3.5"
  • Much larger: Professional size (125×84×102 mm) vs Super compact (104×60×17 mm)
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the P520 and Slice

  • Very large screens: 3.2" vs 3.5"
  • Inexpensive: $379.95 vs $140.99

Nikon Coolpix L810

Nikon Coolpix L810
2 years newer
$220

Significant advantages of the L810 (vs the Slice)

  • Much better wide angle: 23 mm vs 35 mm
  • Much wider aperture: f/3.1 vs f/4.8

Significant disadvantages of the L810 (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • Significantly larger: Prosumer size (111×76×83 mm) vs Super compact (104×60×17 mm)
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the L810 and Slice

  • Fairly small: Prosumer size (111×76×83 mm) vs Super compact (104×60×17 mm)
  • Thin: 3.3" vs 0.7"
  • Light weight: 430 g vs 158 g

compared toEntry-level DSLR competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Kodak Slice compared to entry-level DSLR competitors include: it has a much larger screen (3.5" vs 3"), has image stabilization (lens vs none), is much smaller (super compact (104×60×17 mm) vs professional size (132×111×78 mm)), is much less expensive ($140.99 vs $1,099.00) and is thinner (0.7" vs 3.1").

However, on average it records lower quality movies (848 x 480 @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps), takes much lower resolution photos (9.7 MP vs 24 MP), slightly lower maximum light sensitivity (3,200 ISO vs 25,600 ISO), doesn't record movies in 24p and doesn't shoot as fast continuously (3 fps vs 5 fps).

Canon Rebel T5i

Canon Rebel T5i
3 years newer
$429 - $649 (body only)
$520 - $649 18-55mm lens

Significant advantages of the T5i (vs the Slice)

  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs 848 x 480 @ 30fps
  • Has a viewfinder: Pentamirror vs None
  • Supports 24p

Significant disadvantages of the T5i (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • Much thicker: 3.1" vs 0.7"
  • No image stabilization: None vs
    1. Lens

common strengths of the T5i and Slice

  • Have touch screens
  • Inexpensive: $428.99 vs $140.99

Canon EOS Rebel T6s

Canon EOS Rebel T6s
5 years newer
$1,099 18-55mm, 75-300mm lenses

Significant advantages of the T6s (vs the Slice)

  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs 848 x 480 @ 30fps
  • Has a viewfinder: Pentamirror vs None
  • Much higher true resolution: 24 MP vs 9.7 MP

Significant disadvantages of the T6s (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • Much larger: Professional size (132×111×78 mm) vs Super compact (104×60×17 mm)
  • Much thicker: 3.1" vs 0.7"

common strengths of the T6s and Slice

  • Have touch screens

compared toUltra compact competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Kodak Slice compared to ultra compact competitors include: it has a much larger screen (3.5" vs 2.7"), has a touch screen and has a faster max shutter speed (1/2000 of a second vs 1/1600 of a second).

However, on average it has a much narrower aperture (f/4.8 vs f/2.8), records lower quality movies (848 x 480 @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps), has a much narrower wide angle lens (35 mm vs 25 mm), doesn't shoot as fast continuously (3 fps vs 10 fps) and has a CCD-family sensor (CCD vs CMOS).

Sony Cybershot TX10

Sony Cybershot DSC-TX10
1 year newer
$344

Significant advantages of the TX10 (vs the Slice)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the TX10 (vs the Slice)

  • None found

common strengths of the TX10 and Slice

  • None found

Panasonic Lumix DMC-XS1

Panasonic Lumix DMC-XS1
3 years newer
$119 - $174

Significant advantages of the DMC-XS1 (vs the Slice)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the DMC-XS1 (vs the Slice)

  • None found

common strengths of the DMC-XS1 and Slice

  • None found

Sony Cybershot DSC-TX55

Sony Cybershot DSC-TX55
1 year newer

Significant advantages of the DSC-TX55 (vs the Slice)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-TX55 (vs the Slice)

  • None found

common strengths of the DSC-TX55 and Slice

  • None found