Kodak Slice Competitors

5x, f/4.8, 35 mm

As well as being compared against other compacts, the Kodak Slice is also often compared to boutiques, mirrorless, entry-level DSLRs, ultra compacts, travel zooms and super zooms. The Kodak Slice's top rivals come from Panasonic (such as the GX7 and the Lumix ZS30) and Canon (such as the Rebel T5i and the ELPH 320 HS)

Competitor classes

compared toCompact competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Kodak Slice compared to other compact competitors include: it has a much larger screen (3.5" vs 2.7"), has better image stabilization (lens vs digital), takes slightly higher resolution photos (9.7 MP vs 3.9 MP), has a touch screen and is thinner (0.7" vs 1.1").

However, on average it has a much narrower aperture (f/4.8 vs f/2.8), records lower quality movies (848 x 480 @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 24fps), has a much narrower wide angle lens (35 mm vs 25 mm), doesn't record movies in 24p and has a CCD-family sensor (CCD vs CMOS).

Fujifilm FinePix Z90

Fujifilm FinePix Z90
1 year newer
$149

Significant advantages of the Z90 (vs the Slice)

  • Significantly wider aperture: f/3.9 vs f/4.8
  • Much better wide angle: 28 mm vs 35 mm

Significant disadvantages of the Z90 (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • Worse image stabilization: Digital vs Lens

common strengths of the Z90 and Slice

  • Fairly small: Super compact 95x56x20 mm vs Super compact 104x60x17 mm
  • Have touch screens
  • Thin: 0.8" vs 0.7"
arrow Compare the Fujifilm FinePix Z90 vs the Kodak Slice

Canon ELPH 320 HS

Canon PowerShot ELPH 320 HS
2 years newer
$159 - $250

Significant advantages of the 320 HS (vs the Slice)

  • Much wider aperture: f/2.7 vs f/4.8
  • Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 35 mm
  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 24fps vs 848 x 480 @ 30fps

Significant disadvantages of the 320 HS (vs the Slice)

  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.2" vs 3.5"

common strengths of the 320 HS and Slice

  • Larger than average screens: 3.2" vs 3.5"
  • Fairly small: Super compact 94x57x21 mm vs Super compact 104x60x17 mm
  • Good image stabilization: Lens vs Lens
arrow Compare the Canon PowerShot ELPH 320 HS vs the Kodak Slice

Canon PowerShot S410

Placeholder
5 years older

Significant advantages of the S410 (vs the Slice)

  • Much wider aperture: f/2.8 vs f/4.8
  • Significantly better macro capability: 5 cm vs 10 cm
  • Has a viewfinder: Tunnel vs None

Significant disadvantages of the S410 (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 1.5" vs 3.5"
  • No image stabilization: None vs Lens
  • Much lower true resolution: 3.9 MP vs 9.7 MP

common strengths of the S410 and Slice

  • None found
arrow Compare the Canon PowerShot S410 vs the Kodak Slice

Sony Cybershot WX9

Sony Cybershot DSC-WX9
1 year newer
$344

Significant advantages of the WX9 (vs the Slice)

  • Much wider aperture: f/2.6 vs f/4.8
  • Much better wide angle: 25 mm vs 35 mm
  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 60fps vs 848 x 480 @ 30fps

Significant disadvantages of the WX9 (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the WX9 and Slice

  • Fairly small: Super compact 94x56x19 mm vs Super compact 104x60x17 mm
  • Good image stabilization: Lens vs Lens
  • Thin: 0.8" vs 0.7"
arrow Compare the Sony Cybershot DSC-WX9 vs the Kodak Slice

Canon ELPH 300 HS

Canon ELPH 300 HS
1 year newer
$136

Significant advantages of the 300 HS (vs the Slice)

  • Much wider aperture: f/2.7 vs f/4.8
  • Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 35 mm
  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 24fps vs 848 x 480 @ 30fps

Significant disadvantages of the 300 HS (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the 300 HS and Slice

  • Fairly small: Super compact 92x55x19 mm vs Super compact 104x60x17 mm
  • Good image stabilization: Lens vs Lens
  • Thin: 0.8" vs 0.7"
arrow Compare the Canon ELPH 300 HS vs the Kodak Slice

Fujifilm FinePix Z1000 EXR

Fujifilm FinePix Z1000 EXR
2 years newer
$140 - $306

Significant advantages of the Z1000 EXR (vs the Slice)

  • Significantly wider aperture: f/3.9 vs f/4.8
  • Much better wide angle: 28 mm vs 35 mm
  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs 848 x 480 @ 30fps

Significant disadvantages of the Z1000 EXR (vs the Slice)

  • None found

common strengths of the Z1000 EXR and Slice

  • Very large screens: 3.5" vs 3.5"
  • Fairly small: Super compact 102x60x18 mm vs Super compact 104x60x17 mm
  • Have touch screens
arrow Compare the Fujifilm FinePix Z1000 EXR vs the Kodak Slice

compared toBoutique competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Kodak Slice compared to boutique competitors include: it has significantly more zoom (5x vs 1x), has a much larger screen (3.5" vs 2.0"), is much smaller (super compact 104x60x17 mm vs large 139x168x97 mm), has image stabilization (lens vs none) and has a touch screen.

However, on average it has a much narrower aperture (f/4.8 vs f/2.0), records lower quality movies (848 x 480 @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 60fps), has a slightly narrower wide angle lens (35 mm vs 24 mm), takes significantly lower resolution photos (9.7 MP vs 24 MP) and significantly lower maximum light sensitivity (3,200 ISO vs 25,600 ISO).

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX1

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX1
2 years newer
$2,798

Significant advantages of the DSC-RX1 (vs the Slice)

  • Much wider aperture: f/2.0 vs f/4.8
  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 60fps vs 848 x 480 @ 30fps
  • Much larger sensor: Full frame 35.8x23.8mm vs 1/2.3" 6.2x4.6mm

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-RX1 (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • Much less zoom: 1x vs 5x
  • No image stabilization: None vs Lens

common strengths of the DSC-RX1 and Slice

  • None found
arrow Compare the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX1 vs the Kodak Slice

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-R1

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-R1
4 years older

Significant advantages of the DSC-R1 (vs the Slice)

  • Much wider aperture: f/2.8 vs f/4.8
  • Significantly better wide angle: 24 mm vs 35 mm
  • Shoots RAW

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-R1 (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 2.0" vs 3.5"
  • Much larger: Large 139x168x97 mm vs Super compact 104x60x17 mm
  • No image stabilization: None vs Lens

common strengths of the DSC-R1 and Slice

  • Incredible zoom: 5x vs 5x
arrow Compare the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-R1 vs the Kodak Slice

compared toMirrorless interchangeable-lens competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Kodak Slice compared to mirrorless interchangeable-lens competitors include: it has a significantly larger screen (3.5" vs 3.0"), has better image stabilization (lens vs none), is significantly smaller (super compact 104x60x17 mm vs standard size 123x71x55 mm), is thinner (0.7" vs 2.2") and is significantly lighter (158 g vs 402 g).

However, on average it records lower quality movies (848 x 480 @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 60fps), doesn't have a viewfinder (none vs digital), takes significantly lower resolution photos (9.7 MP vs 16 MP), much lower maximum light sensitivity (3,200 ISO vs 25,600 ISO) and doesn't record movies in 24p.

Panasonic GX7

Panasonic GX7
3 years newer
$719 - $809 (body only)
$959 14-42mm lens

Significant advantages of the GX7 (vs the Slice)

  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 60fps vs 848 x 480 @ 30fps
  • Better maximum light sensitivity: 25,600 ISO vs 3,200 ISO
  • Has a viewfinder: Digital vs None

Significant disadvantages of the GX7 (vs the Slice)

  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • Significantly larger: Standard size 123x71x55 mm vs Super compact 104x60x17 mm
  • Much thicker: 2.2" vs 0.7"

common strengths of the GX7 and Slice

  • Good image stabilization: Sensor shift vs Lens
  • Have touch screens
  • Each has a built-in flash
arrow Compare the Panasonic GX7 vs the Kodak Slice

Sony NEX-5T

Sony NEX-5T
3 years newer
$448 - $548 (body only)
$598 - $599 16-50mm lens

Significant advantages of the NEX-5T (vs the Slice)

  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 60fps vs 848 x 480 @ 30fps
  • Better maximum light sensitivity: 25,600 ISO vs 3,200 ISO
  • Shoots RAW

Significant disadvantages of the NEX-5T (vs the Slice)

  • No image stabilization: None vs Lens
  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • Significantly thicker: 1.5" vs 0.7"

common strengths of the NEX-5T and Slice

  • Have touch screens
  • Fairly small: Mid size 111x59x39 mm vs Super compact 104x60x17 mm
  • Light weight: 276 g vs 158 g
arrow Compare the Sony NEX-5T vs the Kodak Slice

compared toEntry-level DSLR competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Kodak Slice compared to entry-level DSLR competitors include: it has a much larger screen (3.5" vs 3.0"), has image stabilization (lens vs none), has a touch screen, is much smaller (super compact 104x60x17 mm vs professional size 133x99x79 mm) and is thinner (0.7" vs 3.1").

However, on average it records lower quality movies (848 x 480 @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps), takes much lower resolution photos (9.7 MP vs 17.9 MP), doesn't record movies in 24p, doesn't shoot as fast continuously (3 fps vs 5 fps) and doesn't have a screen which flips out.

Canon Rebel T5i

Canon Rebel T5i
3 years newer
$649 - $681 (body only)
$799 - $838 18-55mm lens

Significant advantages of the T5i (vs the Slice)

  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs 848 x 480 @ 30fps
  • Much larger sensor: APS-C 22.3x14.9mm vs 1/2.3" 6.2x4.6mm
  • Has a viewfinder: Pentamirror vs None

Significant disadvantages of the T5i (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • Much larger: Professional size 133x100x79 mm vs Super compact 104x60x17 mm
  • No image stabilization: None vs Lens

common strengths of the T5i and Slice

  • Have touch screens
arrow Compare the Canon Rebel T5i vs the Kodak Slice

Canon Rebel T4i

Canon Rebel T4i
2 years newer
$610 (body only)
$715 - $720 18-55mm lens

Significant advantages of the T4i (vs the Slice)

  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs 848 x 480 @ 30fps
  • Much larger sensor: APS-C 22.3x14.9mm vs 1/2.3" 6.2x4.6mm
  • Has a viewfinder: Pentamirror vs None

Significant disadvantages of the T4i (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • Much larger: Professional size 133x99x78 mm vs Super compact 104x60x17 mm
  • No image stabilization: None vs Lens

common strengths of the T4i and Slice

  • Have touch screens
arrow Compare the Canon Rebel T4i vs the Kodak Slice

Canon Rebel T3i

Canon Rebel T3i
1 year newer
$490 - $500 (body only)
$549 - $600 18-55mm lens

Significant advantages of the T3i (vs the Slice)

  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs 848 x 480 @ 30fps
  • Much larger sensor: APS-C 22.3x14.9mm vs 1/2.3" 6.2x4.6mm
  • Has a viewfinder: Pentamirror vs None

Significant disadvantages of the T3i (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • Much larger: Professional size 133x99x79 mm vs Super compact 104x60x17 mm
  • No image stabilization: None vs Lens

common strengths of the T3i and Slice

  • None found
arrow Compare the Canon Rebel T3i vs the Kodak Slice

compared toUltra compact competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Kodak Slice compared to ultra compact competitors include: it has a significantly larger screen (3.5" vs 3.0") and has a touch screen.

However, on average it has a much narrower aperture (f/4.8 vs f/3.5), records lower quality movies (848 x 480 @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 60fps), has a slightly narrower wide angle lens (35 mm vs 26 mm), slightly lower maximum light sensitivity (3,200 ISO vs 12,800 ISO) and has a CCD-family sensor (CCD vs CMOS).

Kodak EasyShare M590

Kodak EasyShare M590
7 months newer

Significant advantages of the M590 (vs the Slice)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the M590 (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the M590 and Slice

  • Each has a built-in flash
  • Good image stabilization: Lens vs Lens
  • Thin: 0.6" vs 0.7"
arrow Compare the EasyShare M590 vs the Slice

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX200V

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX200V
2 years newer
$213 - $280

Significant advantages of the DSC-TX200V (vs the Slice)

  • Much wider aperture: f/3.5 vs f/4.8
  • Much better wide angle: 26 mm vs 35 mm
  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 60fps vs 848 x 480 @ 30fps

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-TX200V (vs the Slice)

  • None found

common strengths of the DSC-TX200V and Slice

  • Each has a built-in flash
  • Very large screens: 3.3" vs 3.5"
  • Good image stabilization: Lens vs Lens
arrow Compare the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX200V vs the Kodak Slice

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900
10 months older

Significant advantages of the DSC-T900 (vs the Slice)

  • Much wider aperture: f/3.5 vs f/4.8

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-T900 (vs the Slice)

  • No touch screen

common strengths of the DSC-T900 and Slice

  • Each has a built-in flash
  • Very large screens: 3.5" vs 3.5"
  • Good image stabilization: Lens vs Lens
arrow Compare the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900 vs the Kodak Slice

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX1

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX1
5 months older

Significant advantages of the DSC-TX1 (vs the Slice)

  • Much wider aperture: f/3.5 vs f/4.8
  • Much better macro capability: 1 cm vs 10 cm
  • Can create panoramas in-camera

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-TX1 (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"

common strengths of the DSC-TX1 and Slice

  • Each has a built-in flash
  • Larger than average screens: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • Good image stabilization: Lens vs Lens
arrow Compare the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX1 vs the Kodak Slice

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX30

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX30
3 years newer
$230 - $269

Significant advantages of the DSC-TX30 (vs the Slice)

  • Much wider aperture: f/3.5 vs f/4.8
  • Much better wide angle: 26 mm vs 35 mm
  • Has an OLED screen: OLED vs LCD

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-TX30 (vs the Slice)

  • None found

common strengths of the DSC-TX30 and Slice

  • Each has a built-in flash
  • Very large screens: 3.3" vs 3.5"
  • Good image stabilization: Lens vs Lens
arrow Compare the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX30 vs the Kodak Slice

compared toTravel zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Kodak Slice compared to travel zoom competitors include: it has a much larger screen (3.5" vs 2.7") and has a touch screen.

However, on average it has a significantly narrower wide angle lens (35 mm vs 24 mm), has a much narrower aperture (f/4.8 vs f/3.3), doesn't have a built-in GPS, records lower quality movies (848 x 480 @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps) and doesn't record high-speed movies (none vs 220 fps).

Panasonic Lumix ZS30

Panasonic Lumix ZS30
3 years newer
$300 - $399

Significant advantages of the ZS30 (vs the Slice)

  • Has a GPS
  • Much wider aperture: f/3.3 vs f/4.8
  • Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 35 mm

Significant disadvantages of the ZS30 (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"

common strengths of the ZS30 and Slice

  • Have touch screens
arrow Compare the Panasonic Lumix ZS30 vs the Kodak Slice

Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS10

Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS10
1 year newer
$270 - $300

Significant advantages of the DMC-ZS10 (vs the Slice)

  • Has a GPS
  • Much wider aperture: f/3.3 vs f/4.8
  • Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 35 mm

Significant disadvantages of the DMC-ZS10 (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"

common strengths of the DMC-ZS10 and Slice

  • Have touch screens
arrow Compare the Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS10 vs the Kodak Slice

Canon IXUS 132

Canon IXUS 132
3 years newer
$95

Significant advantages of the IXUS 132 (vs the Slice)

  • Much wider aperture: f/3.2 vs f/4.8
  • Faster autofocus: Phase detection vs Contrast detection
  • Significantly better wide angle: 28 mm vs 35 mm

Significant disadvantages of the IXUS 132 (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the IXUS 132 and Slice

  • None found
arrow Compare the Canon IXUS 132 vs the Kodak Slice

Canon PowerShot SX150 IS

Canon PowerShot SX150 IS
1 year newer
$98 - $250

Significant advantages of the SX150 IS (vs the Slice)

  • Much wider aperture: f/3.4 vs f/4.8
  • Significantly better wide angle: 28 mm vs 35 mm
  • Much better macro capability: 1 cm vs 10 cm

Significant disadvantages of the SX150 IS (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the SX150 IS and Slice

  • None found
arrow Compare the Canon PowerShot SX150 IS vs the Kodak Slice

Fujifilm FinePix T550

Fujifilm FinePix T550
3 years newer
$99 - $157

Significant advantages of the T550 (vs the Slice)

  • Much wider aperture: f/3.4 vs f/4.8
  • Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 35 mm
  • Takes 3D photos

Significant disadvantages of the T550 (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the T550 and Slice

  • None found
arrow Compare the Fujifilm FinePix T550 vs the Kodak Slice

Panasonic Lumix ZS20

Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS20
2 years newer
$162 - $399

Significant advantages of the ZS20 (vs the Slice)

  • Has a GPS
  • Much wider aperture: f/3.3 vs f/4.8
  • Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 35 mm

Significant disadvantages of the ZS20 (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"

common strengths of the ZS20 and Slice

  • Have touch screens
arrow Compare the Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS20 vs the Kodak Slice

compared toSuper zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Kodak Slice compared to super zoom competitors include: it has a much larger screen (3.5" vs 2.5"), is significantly smaller (super compact 104x60x17 mm vs prosumer size 111x76x85 mm), takes slightly higher resolution photos (9.7 MP vs 5 MP), has a touch screen and is thinner (0.7" vs 3.3").

However, on average it has a much narrower aperture (f/4.8 vs f/3.1), has slightly less zoom (5x vs 29.3x), records lower quality movies (848 x 480 @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps), has a significantly narrower wide angle lens (35 mm vs 24 mm) and doesn't have a screen which flips out.

Nikon Coolpix L830

Nikon Coolpix L830
4 years newer
$267 - $297

Significant advantages of the L830 (vs the Slice)

  • Much wider aperture: f/3.0 vs f/4.8
  • Much better wide angle: 22 mm vs 35 mm
  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs 848 x 480 @ 30fps

Significant disadvantages of the L830 (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen
  • Significantly larger: Prosumer size 111x75x91 mm vs Super compact 104x60x17 mm

common strengths of the L830 and Slice

  • Fairly small: Prosumer size 111x75x91 mm vs Super compact 104x60x17 mm
arrow Compare the Nikon Coolpix L830 vs the Kodak Slice

Kodak PixPro AZ251

Kodak PixPro AZ251
3 years newer
$149

Significant advantages of the AZ251 (vs the Slice)

  • Much wider aperture: f/3.7 vs f/4.8
  • Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 35 mm
  • Much better macro capability: 3 cm vs 10 cm

Significant disadvantages of the AZ251 (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen
  • Larger: Standard size 115x74x69 mm vs Super compact 104x60x17 mm

common strengths of the AZ251 and Slice

  • Fairly small: Standard size 115x74x69 mm vs Super compact 104x60x17 mm
  • Thin: 2.7" vs 0.7"
  • Light weight: 354 g vs 158 g
arrow Compare the PixPro AZ251 vs the Slice

Nikon Coolpix L820

Nikon Coolpix L820
3 years newer
$179 - $279

Significant advantages of the L820 (vs the Slice)

  • Much wider aperture: f/3.0 vs f/4.8
  • Much better wide angle: 23 mm vs 35 mm
  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs 848 x 480 @ 30fps

Significant disadvantages of the L820 (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen
  • Significantly larger: Prosumer size 111x76x85 mm vs Super compact 104x60x17 mm

common strengths of the L820 and Slice

  • Fairly small: Prosumer size 111x76x85 mm vs Super compact 104x60x17 mm
  • Light weight: 470 g vs 158 g
arrow Compare the Nikon Coolpix L820 vs the Kodak Slice

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H1

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H1
4 years older

Significant advantages of the DSC-H1 (vs the Slice)

  • Much wider aperture: f/2.8 vs f/4.8
  • Much better macro capability: 2 cm vs 10 cm
  • Has a viewfinder: Digital vs None

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-H1 (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 2.5" vs 3.5"
  • Much lower true resolution: 5 MP vs 9.7 MP
  • Significantly larger: Prosumer size 108x81x92 mm vs Super compact 104x60x17 mm

common strengths of the DSC-H1 and Slice

  • Fairly small: Prosumer size 108x81x92 mm vs Super compact 104x60x17 mm
arrow Compare the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H1 vs the Kodak Slice

Nikon Coolpix L810

Nikon Coolpix L810
2 years newer
$173

Significant advantages of the L810 (vs the Slice)

  • Much wider aperture: f/3.1 vs f/4.8
  • Much better wide angle: 23 mm vs 35 mm
  • Much better macro capability: 1 cm vs 10 cm

Significant disadvantages of the L810 (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen
  • Significantly larger: Prosumer size 111x76x83 mm vs Super compact 104x60x17 mm

common strengths of the L810 and Slice

  • Fairly small: Prosumer size 111x76x83 mm vs Super compact 104x60x17 mm
  • Thin: 3.3" vs 0.7"
  • Light weight: 430 g vs 158 g
arrow Compare the Nikon Coolpix L810 vs the Kodak Slice