As well as being compared against other compacts, the Kodak Slice is also often compared to entry-level DSLRs, ultra compacts, super zooms and travel zooms. The Kodak Slice's top rivals come from Canon (such as the PowerShot SD40 and the Rebel T4i) and Nikon (such as the Coolpix S80 and the D3200)

compared toCompact competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Kodak Slice compared to other compact competitors include: it has a much larger screen (3.5" vs 2.7"), has better image stabilization (lens vs digital), has a touch screen, is thinner (0.7" vs 0.9") and has a faster max shutter speed (1/2000 of a second vs 1/1600 of a second).

However, on average it has a much narrower aperture (f/4.8 vs f/2.8), records lower quality movies (848 x 480 @ 30fps vs 720p @ 24fps), has a much narrower wide angle lens (35 mm vs 28 mm), doesn't record high-speed movies (none vs 240 fps) and doesn't record movies in 24p.

Nikon Coolpix S80

Nikon Coolpix S80
8 months newer
$162

Significant advantages of the S80 (vs the Slice)

  • Significantly wider aperture: f/3.6 vs f/4.8
  • Has an OLED screen: OLED vs LCD
  • Supports 24p

Significant disadvantages of the S80 (vs the Slice)

  • Significantly slower max shutter speed: 1/1500 of a second vs 1/2000 of a second

common strengths of the S80 and Slice

  • Very large screens: 3.5" vs 3.5"
  • Fairly small: Super compact (99×63×17 mm) vs Super compact (104×60×17 mm)
  • Good image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs
    1. Lens

Canon PowerShot SD40

Canon PowerShot SD40
3 years older
$175

Significant advantages of the SD40 (vs the Slice)

  • Much wider aperture: f/3.2 vs f/4.8

Significant disadvantages of the SD40 (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 1.8" vs 3.5"
  • No image stabilization: None vs
    1. Lens
  • Significantly worse wide angle: 38 mm vs 35 mm

common strengths of the SD40 and Slice

  • Fairly small: Super compact (96×45×24 mm) vs Super compact (104×60×17 mm)
  • Thin: 0.9" vs 0.7"

Canon PowerShot SD1300 IS

Canon PowerShot SD1300 IS
similar age
$194

Significant advantages of the SD1300 IS (vs the Slice)

  • Much wider aperture: f/2.8 vs f/4.8
  • Much better wide angle: 28 mm vs 35 mm

Significant disadvantages of the SD1300 IS (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen
  • Significantly slower max shutter speed: 1/1500 of a second vs 1/2000 of a second

common strengths of the SD1300 IS and Slice

  • Fairly small: Super compact (91×56×22 mm) vs Super compact (104×60×17 mm)
  • Good image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs
    1. Lens
  • Thin: 0.9" vs 0.7"

Fujifilm FinePix Z90

Fujifilm FinePix Z90
1 year newer
$120

Significant advantages of the Z90 (vs the Slice)

  • Much better wide angle: 28 mm vs 35 mm
  • Significantly wider aperture: f/3.9 vs f/4.8

Significant disadvantages of the Z90 (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • Worse image stabilization:
    1. Digital
    vs
    1. Lens

common strengths of the Z90 and Slice

  • Larger than average screens: 3" vs 3.5"
  • Fairly small: Super compact (95×57×20 mm) vs Super compact (104×60×17 mm)
  • Have touch screens

Canon ELPH 300 HS

Canon ELPH 300 HS
1 year newer
$300

Significant advantages of the 300 HS (vs the Slice)

  • Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 35 mm
  • Much wider aperture: f/2.7 vs f/4.8
  • Records high-speed movies: 240 fps vs None

Significant disadvantages of the 300 HS (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the 300 HS and Slice

  • Fairly small: Super compact (92×56×20 mm) vs Super compact (104×60×17 mm)
  • Good image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs
    1. Lens
  • Thin: 0.8" vs 0.7"

Olympus VG-160

Olympus VG-160
2 years newer
$123

Significant advantages of the VG-160 (vs the Slice)

  • Much better wide angle: 26 mm vs 35 mm
  • Much wider aperture: f/2.8 vs f/4.8

Significant disadvantages of the VG-160 (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • Worse image stabilization:
    1. Digital
    vs
    1. Lens
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the VG-160 and Slice

  • Larger than average screens: 3" vs 3.5"
  • Fairly small: Super compact (96×57×19 mm) vs Super compact (104×60×17 mm)
  • Thin: 0.7" vs 0.7"

compared toEntry-level DSLR competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Kodak Slice compared to entry-level DSLR competitors include: it has a much larger screen (3.5" vs 3"), has image stabilization (lens vs none), has a touch screen, is much smaller (super compact (104×60×17 mm) vs professional size (132×101×78 mm)) and is significantly less expensive ($150.00 vs $499.00).

However, on average it records lower quality movies (848 x 480 @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps), takes much lower resolution photos (9.7 MP vs 24 MP), doesn't record movies in 24p, doesn't shoot as fast continuously (3 fps vs 5 fps) and doesn't have a screen which flips out.

Canon Rebel T4i

Canon Rebel T4i
2 years newer
$400 (body only)
$669 18-55mm lens

Significant advantages of the T4i (vs the Slice)

  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs 848 x 480 @ 30fps
  • Has a viewfinder: Pentamirror vs None
  • Supports 24p

Significant disadvantages of the T4i (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • No image stabilization: None vs
    1. Lens
  • Much thicker: 3.1" vs 0.7"

common strengths of the T4i and Slice

  • Have touch screens
  • Inexpensive: $399.99 vs $150.00

Nikon D3200

Nikon D3200
2 years newer
$348 (body only)
$426 18-55mm lens

Significant advantages of the D3200 (vs the Slice)

  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs 848 x 480 @ 30fps
  • Has a viewfinder: Pentamirror vs None
  • Much higher true resolution: 24.1 MP vs 9.7 MP

Significant disadvantages of the D3200 (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • No image stabilization: None vs
    1. Lens
  • Much thicker: 3" vs 0.7"

common strengths of the D3200 and Slice

  • Light weight: 505 g vs 158 g
  • Inexpensive: $348.00 vs $150.00

Canon Rebel T5i

Canon Rebel T5i
3 years newer
$390 - $649 (body only)
$479 - $599 18-55mm lens

Significant advantages of the T5i (vs the Slice)

  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs 848 x 480 @ 30fps
  • Has a viewfinder: Pentamirror vs None
  • Supports 24p

Significant disadvantages of the T5i (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • No image stabilization: None vs
    1. Lens
  • Much thicker: 3.1" vs 0.7"

common strengths of the T5i and Slice

  • Have touch screens
  • Inexpensive: $390.00 vs $150.00

Canon Rebel T3i

Canon Rebel T3i
1 year newer
$499 (body only)
$759 18-55mm lens

Significant advantages of the T3i (vs the Slice)

  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs 848 x 480 @ 30fps
  • Has a viewfinder: Pentamirror vs None
  • Supports 24p

Significant disadvantages of the T3i (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • No image stabilization: None vs
    1. Lens
  • Much thicker: 3.1" vs 0.7"

common strengths of the T3i and Slice

  • Inexpensive: $499.00 vs $150.00

Canon EOS Rebel T6i

Canon EOS Rebel T6i
5 years newer
$799 18-55mm lens

Significant advantages of the T6i (vs the Slice)

  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs 848 x 480 @ 30fps
  • Has a viewfinder: Pentamirror vs None
  • Much higher true resolution: 24 MP vs 9.7 MP

Significant disadvantages of the T6i (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • Much thicker: 3.1" vs 0.7"
  • Much larger: Professional size (132×101×78 mm) vs Super compact (104×60×17 mm)

common strengths of the T6i and Slice

  • Have touch screens

compared toUltra compact competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Kodak Slice compared to ultra compact competitors include: it has a much larger screen (3.5" vs 2.7"), has a touch screen, is slightly less expensive ($150.00 vs $338.98) and has a faster max shutter speed (1/2000 of a second vs 1/1000 of a second).

However, on average it has a much narrower aperture (f/4.8 vs f/2.8), records lower quality movies (848 x 480 @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps), has a much narrower wide angle lens (35 mm vs 26 mm), is older (january 2010 vs february 2011) and is slightly heavier (158 g vs 118 g).

Canon PowerShot SD780 IS

Canon PowerShot SD780 IS
10 months older
$339

Significant advantages of the SD780 IS (vs the Slice)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the SD780 IS (vs the Slice)

  • None found

common strengths of the SD780 IS and Slice

  • None found

Panasonic Lumix DMC-XS1

Panasonic Lumix DMC-XS1
3 years newer
$129

Significant advantages of the DMC-XS1 (vs the Slice)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the DMC-XS1 (vs the Slice)

  • None found

common strengths of the DMC-XS1 and Slice

  • None found

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900
10 months older
$600

Significant advantages of the DSC-T900 (vs the Slice)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-T900 (vs the Slice)

  • None found

common strengths of the DSC-T900 and Slice

  • None found

Sony Cybershot DSC-WX30

Sony Cybershot DSC-WX30
1 year newer
$222

Significant advantages of the DSC-WX30 (vs the Slice)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-WX30 (vs the Slice)

  • None found

common strengths of the DSC-WX30 and Slice

  • None found

Nikon Coolpix S3100

Nikon Coolpix S3100
1 year newer
$138

Significant advantages of the S3100 (vs the Slice)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the S3100 (vs the Slice)

  • None found

common strengths of the S3100 and Slice

  • None found

compared toSuper zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Kodak Slice compared to super zoom competitors include: it has a much larger screen (3.5" vs 3"), is significantly smaller (super compact (104×60×17 mm) vs prosumer size (119×86×98 mm)), has a touch screen, is thinner (0.7" vs 3.8") and is slightly lighter (158 g vs 551 g).

However, on average it has a much narrower aperture (f/4.8 vs f/2.9), has much less zoom (5x vs 52x), has a much narrower wide angle lens (35 mm vs 24 mm), doesn't record high-speed movies (none vs 120 fps) and has a CCD-family sensor (CCD vs CMOS).

Canon PowerShot SX410 IS

Canon PowerShot SX410 IS
5 years newer
$212

Significant advantages of the SX410 IS (vs the Slice)

  • Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 35 mm
  • Significantly wider aperture: f/3.5 vs f/4.8
  • Significantly more zoom: 40x vs 5x

Significant disadvantages of the SX410 IS (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen
  • Larger: Standard size (104×69×85 mm) vs Super compact (104×60×17 mm)

common strengths of the SX410 IS and Slice

  • Fairly small: Standard size (104×69×85 mm) vs Super compact (104×60×17 mm)
  • Light weight: 325 g vs 158 g
  • Thin: 3.3" vs 0.7"

Kodak PixPro AZ521

Kodak PixPro AZ521
3 years newer
$271

Significant advantages of the AZ521 (vs the Slice)

  • Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 35 mm
  • Much wider aperture: f/2.9 vs f/4.8
  • Much more zoom: 52x vs 5x

Significant disadvantages of the AZ521 (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • Significantly larger: Prosumer size (119×86×98 mm) vs Super compact (104×60×17 mm)
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the AZ521 and Slice

  • Fairly small: Prosumer size (119×86×98 mm) vs Super compact (104×60×17 mm)
  • Inexpensive: $271.29 vs $150.00

compared toTravel zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Kodak Slice compared to travel zoom competitors include: it has a much larger screen (3.5" vs 2.7"), is significantly smaller (super compact (104×60×17 mm) vs compact (105×59×28 mm)), has a touch screen and is thinner (0.7" vs 1.2").

However, on average it has slightly less zoom (5x vs 20x), has a much narrower wide angle lens (35 mm vs 24 mm), has a much narrower aperture (f/4.8 vs f/3), records lower quality movies (848 x 480 @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps) and doesn't record high-speed movies (none vs 220 fps).

Canon PowerShot ELPH 150 IS

Canon PowerShot ELPH 150 IS
4 years newer
$167

Significant advantages of the ELPH 150 IS (vs the Slice)

  • Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 35 mm
  • Much wider aperture: f/3 vs f/4.8

Significant disadvantages of the ELPH 150 IS (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen
  • Thicker: 0.9" vs 0.7"

common strengths of the ELPH 150 IS and Slice

  • Very small: Compact (95×57×24 mm) vs Super compact (104×60×17 mm)
  • Thin: 0.9" vs 0.7"
  • Light weight: 142 g vs 158 g

Panasonic Lumix ZS25

Panasonic Lumix ZS25
3 years newer
$309

Significant advantages of the ZS25 (vs the Slice)

  • Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 35 mm
  • Records high-speed movies: 220 fps vs None
  • Much wider aperture: f/3.3 vs f/4.8

Significant disadvantages of the ZS25 (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen
  • Significantly larger: Compact (105×59×28 mm) vs Super compact (104×60×17 mm)

common strengths of the ZS25 and Slice

  • Larger than average screens: 3" vs 3.5"
  • Fairly small: Compact (105×59×28 mm) vs Super compact (104×60×17 mm)
  • Thin: 1.1" vs 0.7"

Canon ELPH 310 HS

Canon ELPH 310 HS
1 year newer
$329

Significant advantages of the 310 HS (vs the Slice)

  • Much better wide angle: 28 mm vs 35 mm
  • Much wider aperture: f/3 vs f/4.8
  • Records high-speed movies: 240 fps vs None

Significant disadvantages of the 310 HS (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the 310 HS and Slice

  • Larger than average screens: 3" vs 3.5"
  • Very small: Super compact (96×57×22 mm) vs Super compact (104×60×17 mm)
  • Very thin: 0.9" vs 0.7"

Olympus SZ-20

Olympus SZ-20
1 year newer

Significant advantages of the SZ-20 (vs the Slice)

  • Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 35 mm
  • Much wider aperture: f/3 vs f/4.8
  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs 848 x 480 @ 30fps

Significant disadvantages of the SZ-20 (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • Much larger: Compact (102×64×30 mm) vs Super compact (104×60×17 mm)
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the SZ-20 and Slice

  • Larger than average screens: 3" vs 3.5"

Kodak EasyShare Z915

Kodak EasyShare Z915
1 year older
$250

Significant advantages of the Z915 (vs the Slice)

  • Significantly wider aperture: f/3.5 vs f/4.8

Significant disadvantages of the Z915 (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 2.5" vs 3.5"
  • Much larger: Compact (90×64×39 mm) vs Super compact (104×60×17 mm)
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the Z915 and Slice

  • None found