As well as being compared against other compacts, the Kodak Slice is also often compared to ultra compacts, entry-level DSLRs, travel zooms and super zooms. The Kodak Slice's top rivals come from Kodak (such as the EasyShare M590 and the EasyShare Touch M577) and Olympus (such as the Stylus SZ-16 iHS and the SZ10)

compared toCompact competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Kodak Slice compared to other compact competitors include: it has a much larger screen (3.5" vs 3"), is slightly smaller (super compact (104×60×17 mm) vs compact (98×58×27 mm)), has a touch screen and is thinner (0.7" vs 1").

However, on average it has a much narrower aperture (f/4.8 vs f/2.8), records lower quality movies (848 x 480 @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps), has a much narrower wide angle lens (35 mm vs 24 mm), doesn't record high-speed movies (none vs 240 fps) and has a CCD-family sensor (CCD vs CMOS).

Canon PowerShot A3400 IS

Canon PowerShot A3400 IS
2 years newer
$145

Significant advantages of the A3400 IS (vs the Slice)

  • Much wider aperture: f/2.8 vs f/4.8
  • Much better wide angle: 28 mm vs 35 mm
  • Much better macro capability: 3.0 cm vs 10.0 cm

Significant disadvantages of the A3400 IS (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"

common strengths of the A3400 IS and Slice

  • Larger than average screens: 3" vs 3.5"
  • Fairly small: Super compact (95×56×21 mm) vs Super compact (104×60×17 mm)
  • Good image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs
    1. Lens

Canon PowerShot S120

Canon PowerShot S120
3 years newer
$349

Significant advantages of the S120 (vs the Slice)

  • Records high-speed movies: 240 fps vs None
  • Much wider aperture: f/1.8 vs f/4.8
  • Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 35 mm

Significant disadvantages of the S120 (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • Significantly larger: Compact (100×59×29 mm) vs Super compact (104×60×17 mm)
  • Much thicker: 1.1" vs 0.7"

common strengths of the S120 and Slice

  • Larger than average screens: 3" vs 3.5"
  • Good image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs
    1. Lens
  • Have touch screens

Nikon Coolpix S6100

Nikon Coolpix S6100
1 year newer
$238

Significant advantages of the S6100 (vs the Slice)

  • Much better wide angle: 28 mm vs 35 mm
  • Significantly wider aperture: f/3.7 vs f/4.8
  • Much better macro capability: 3.0 cm vs 10.0 cm

Significant disadvantages of the S6100 (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • Significantly thicker: 1" vs 0.7"

common strengths of the S6100 and Slice

  • Larger than average screens: 3" vs 3.5"
  • Fairly small: Compact (98×58×27 mm) vs Super compact (104×60×17 mm)
  • Good image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs
    1. Lens

Canon PowerShot SD3500 IS

Canon PowerShot SD3500 IS
similar age

Significant advantages of the SD3500 IS (vs the Slice)

  • Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 35 mm
  • Much wider aperture: f/2.8 vs f/4.8
  • Much better macro capability: 3.0 cm vs 10.0 cm

Significant disadvantages of the SD3500 IS (vs the Slice)

  • None found

common strengths of the SD3500 IS and Slice

  • Very large screens: 3.5" vs 3.5"
  • Fairly small: Super compact (99×56×22 mm) vs Super compact (104×60×17 mm)
  • Good image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs
    1. Lens

Nikon Coolpix P310

Nikon Coolpix P310
2 years newer
$298

Significant advantages of the P310 (vs the Slice)

  • Much wider aperture: f/1.8 vs f/4.8
  • Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 35 mm
  • Much better macro capability: 2.0 cm vs 10.0 cm

Significant disadvantages of the P310 (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen
  • Significantly larger: Compact (103×58×32 mm) vs Super compact (104×60×17 mm)

common strengths of the P310 and Slice

  • Larger than average screens: 3" vs 3.5"
  • Good image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs
    1. Lens

Fujifilm FinePix Z90

Fujifilm FinePix Z90
1 year newer
$110

Significant advantages of the Z90 (vs the Slice)

  • Much better wide angle: 28 mm vs 35 mm
  • Significantly wider aperture: f/3.9 vs f/4.8

Significant disadvantages of the Z90 (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • Worse image stabilization:
    1. Digital
    vs
    1. Lens

common strengths of the Z90 and Slice

  • Larger than average screens: 3" vs 3.5"
  • Fairly small: Super compact (95×57×20 mm) vs Super compact (104×60×17 mm)
  • Have touch screens

compared toUltra compact competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Kodak Slice compared to ultra compact competitors include: it has a much larger screen (3.5" vs 2.7"), has a touch screen and has a faster max shutter speed (1/2000 of a second vs 1/1200 of a second).

However, on average it has a much narrower aperture (f/4.8 vs f/2.6), records lower quality movies (848 x 480 @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps), has a much narrower wide angle lens (35 mm vs 26 mm), slightly lower maximum light sensitivity (3,200 ISO vs 12,800 ISO) and doesn't shoot as fast continuously (3 fps vs 10 fps).

Kodak EasyShare M590

Kodak EasyShare M590
7 months newer
$119

Significant advantages of the M590 (vs the Slice)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the M590 (vs the Slice)

  • None found

common strengths of the M590 and Slice

  • None found

Sony Cyber-shot WX50

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX50
2 years newer
$185

Significant advantages of the WX50 (vs the Slice)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the WX50 (vs the Slice)

  • None found

common strengths of the WX50 and Slice

  • None found

Samsung ST95

Samsung ST95
1 year newer
$175

Significant advantages of the ST95 (vs the Slice)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the ST95 (vs the Slice)

  • None found

common strengths of the ST95 and Slice

  • None found

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX30

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX30
3 years newer
$228 - $270

Significant advantages of the DSC-TX30 (vs the Slice)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-TX30 (vs the Slice)

  • None found

common strengths of the DSC-TX30 and Slice

  • None found

Sony Cybershot DSC-WX30

Sony Cybershot DSC-WX30
1 year newer
$240

Significant advantages of the DSC-WX30 (vs the Slice)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-WX30 (vs the Slice)

  • None found

common strengths of the DSC-WX30 and Slice

  • None found

compared toEntry-level DSLR competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Kodak Slice compared to entry-level DSLR competitors include: it has a much larger screen (3.5" vs 3"), has image stabilization (lens vs none), has a touch screen, is much smaller (super compact (104×60×17 mm) vs professional size (132×101×78 mm)) and is slightly less expensive ($249.00 vs $714.99).

However, on average it records lower quality movies (848 x 480 @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 60fps), takes much lower resolution photos (9.7 MP vs 24 MP), slightly lower maximum light sensitivity (3,200 ISO vs 25,600 ISO), doesn't record movies in 24p and doesn't shoot as fast continuously (3 fps vs 5 fps).

Canon EOS Rebel T6s

Canon EOS Rebel T6s
5 years newer
$790 - $849 (body only)
$1,049 18-135mm lens

Significant advantages of the T6s (vs the Slice)

  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs 848 x 480 @ 30fps
  • Has a viewfinder: Pentamirror vs None
  • Supports 24p

Significant disadvantages of the T6s (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • Much larger: Professional size (132×111×78 mm) vs Super compact (104×60×17 mm)
  • Much thicker: 3.1" vs 0.7"

common strengths of the T6s and Slice

  • Have touch screens

Canon EOS Rebel T6i

Canon EOS Rebel T6i
5 years newer
$715 - $749 (body only)
$749 18-55mm lens

Significant advantages of the T6i (vs the Slice)

  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs 848 x 480 @ 30fps
  • Has a viewfinder: Pentamirror vs None
  • Supports 24p

Significant disadvantages of the T6i (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • Much larger: Professional size (132×101×78 mm) vs Super compact (104×60×17 mm)
  • Much thicker: 3.1" vs 0.7"

common strengths of the T6i and Slice

  • Have touch screens

Canon Rebel T3i

Canon Rebel T3i
1 year newer
$687 (body only)
$599 18-55mm lens

Significant advantages of the T3i (vs the Slice)

  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs 848 x 480 @ 30fps
  • Has a viewfinder: Pentamirror vs None
  • Supports 24p

Significant disadvantages of the T3i (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • Much larger: Professional size (133×100×80 mm) vs Super compact (104×60×17 mm)
  • Much thicker: 3.1" vs 0.7"

common strengths of the T3i and Slice

  • None found

Nikon D3300

Nikon D3300
4 years newer
$294 (body only)
$400 - $447 18-55mm lens

Significant advantages of the D3300 (vs the Slice)

  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 60fps vs 848 x 480 @ 30fps
  • Has a viewfinder: Pentamirror vs None
  • Supports 24p

Significant disadvantages of the D3300 (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • Much larger: Prosumer size (124×98×76 mm) vs Super compact (104×60×17 mm)
  • No image stabilization: None vs
    1. Lens

common strengths of the D3300 and Slice

  • Light weight: 430 g vs 158 g
  • Inexpensive: $294.00 vs $249.00

compared toTravel zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Kodak Slice compared to travel zoom competitors include: it has a much larger screen (3.5" vs 2.7") and has a touch screen.

However, on average it has a much narrower wide angle lens (35 mm vs 24 mm), has a much narrower aperture (f/4.8 vs f/3.3), doesn't have a built-in GPS, records lower quality movies (848 x 480 @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps) and doesn't record high-speed movies (none vs 220 fps).

Olympus Stylus SZ-16 iHS

Olympus Stylus SZ-16 iHS
3 years newer
$248

Significant advantages of the SZ-16 iHS (vs the Slice)

  • Much wider aperture: f/3 vs f/4.8
  • Records high-speed movies: 240 fps vs None
  • Much better wide angle: 25 mm vs 35 mm

Significant disadvantages of the SZ-16 iHS (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the SZ-16 iHS and Slice

  • None found

Nikon Coolpix S3600

Nikon Coolpix S3600
4 years newer
$80

Significant advantages of the S3600 (vs the Slice)

  • Much better wide angle: 25 mm vs 35 mm
  • Significantly wider aperture: f/3.7 vs f/4.8
  • Much better macro capability: 2.0 cm vs 10.0 cm

Significant disadvantages of the S3600 (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the S3600 and Slice

  • None found

Panasonic Lumix ZS20

Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS20
2 years newer
$564

Significant advantages of the ZS20 (vs the Slice)

  • Takes 3D photos
  • Much wider aperture: f/3.3 vs f/4.8
  • Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 35 mm

Significant disadvantages of the ZS20 (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"

common strengths of the ZS20 and Slice

  • Have touch screens

Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS10

Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS10
1 year newer
$450

Significant advantages of the DMC-ZS10 (vs the Slice)

  • Takes 3D photos
  • Much wider aperture: f/3.3 vs f/4.8
  • Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 35 mm

Significant disadvantages of the DMC-ZS10 (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"

common strengths of the DMC-ZS10 and Slice

  • Have touch screens

Panasonic Lumix ZS30

Panasonic Lumix ZS30
3 years newer
$220

Significant advantages of the ZS30 (vs the Slice)

  • Takes 3D photos
  • Much wider aperture: f/3.3 vs f/4.8
  • Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 35 mm

Significant disadvantages of the ZS30 (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"

common strengths of the ZS30 and Slice

  • Have touch screens

Nikon Coolpix S6300

Nikon Coolpix S6300
2 years newer
$159

Significant advantages of the S6300 (vs the Slice)

  • Much wider aperture: f/3.2 vs f/4.8
  • Takes 3D photos
  • Much better wide angle: 25 mm vs 35 mm

Significant disadvantages of the S6300 (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the S6300 and Slice

  • None found

compared toSuper zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Kodak Slice compared to super zoom competitors include: it has a much larger screen (3.5" vs 3"), is significantly smaller (super compact (104×60×17 mm) vs prosumer size (114×89×96 mm)), has a touch screen, is thinner (0.7" vs 3.8") and is significantly lighter (158 g vs 538 g).

However, on average it has a much narrower aperture (f/4.8 vs f/3.1), has slightly less zoom (5x vs 36x), records lower quality movies (848 x 480 @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps), has a much narrower wide angle lens (35 mm vs 23 mm) and doesn't record high-speed movies (none vs 240 fps).

Nikon Coolpix L840

Nikon Coolpix L840
5 years newer
$179 - $197

Significant advantages of the L840 (vs the Slice)

  • Much wider aperture: f/3 vs f/4.8
  • Much better wide angle: 23 mm vs 35 mm
  • More zoom: 37.2x vs 5x

Significant disadvantages of the L840 (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • Significantly larger: Prosumer size (114×89×96 mm) vs Super compact (104×60×17 mm)
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the L840 and Slice

  • Inexpensive: $179.00 vs $249.00

Nikon Coolpix P500

Nikon Coolpix P500
1 year newer
$139

Significant advantages of the P500 (vs the Slice)

  • Records high-speed movies: 240 fps vs None
  • Much wider aperture: f/3.5 vs f/4.8
  • Much better wide angle: 23 mm vs 35 mm

Significant disadvantages of the P500 (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • Significantly larger: Professional size (116×84×103 mm) vs Super compact (104×60×17 mm)
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the P500 and Slice

  • Light weight: 481 g vs 158 g
  • Inexpensive: $139.00 vs $249.00

Nikon Coolpix L810

Nikon Coolpix L810
2 years newer
$230

Significant advantages of the L810 (vs the Slice)

  • Much wider aperture: f/3.1 vs f/4.8
  • Much better wide angle: 23 mm vs 35 mm
  • Much better macro capability: 1.0 cm vs 10.0 cm

Significant disadvantages of the L810 (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen
  • Significantly larger: Prosumer size (111×76×83 mm) vs Super compact (104×60×17 mm)

common strengths of the L810 and Slice

  • Fairly small: Prosumer size (111×76×83 mm) vs Super compact (104×60×17 mm)
  • Thin: 3.3" vs 0.7"
  • Light weight: 430 g vs 158 g