As well as being compared against other compacts, the Kodak Slice is also often compared to ultra compacts, travel zooms, entry-level DSLRs and super zooms. The Kodak Slice's top rivals come from Nikon (such as the Coolpix S80 and the Coolpix L26) and Kodak (such as the EasyShare M590 and the EasyShare Sport C123)

compared toCompact competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Kodak Slice compared to other compact competitors include: it has a much larger screen (3.5" vs 2.7"), is slightly smaller (super compact (104×60×17 mm) vs compact (96×60×29 mm)), has better image stabilization (lens vs none), has a touch screen and is thinner (0.7" vs 0.9").

However, on average it has a much narrower aperture (f/4.8 vs f/3.2), has a significantly narrower wide angle lens (35 mm vs 26 mm), doesn't record movies in 24p, doesn't have an OLED screen (LCD vs OLED) and slightly worse macro focusing (10.0 cm vs 4.0 cm).

Nikon Coolpix S80

Nikon Coolpix S80
8 months newer
$180

Significant advantages of the S80 (vs the Slice)

  • Much wider aperture: f/3.6 vs f/4.8
  • Has an OLED screen: OLED vs LCD
  • Supports 24p

Significant disadvantages of the S80 (vs the Slice)

  • Significantly slower max shutter speed: 1/1500 of a second vs 1/2000 of a second

common strengths of the S80 and Slice

  • Very large screens: 3.5" vs 3.5"
  • Very small: Super compact (99×63×17 mm) vs Super compact (104×60×17 mm)
  • Good image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs
    1. Lens

Olympus FE-4040

Olympus FE-4040
similar age
$214

Significant advantages of the FE-4040 (vs the Slice)

  • Much wider aperture: f/2.6 vs f/4.8
  • Much better wide angle: 26 mm vs 35 mm
  • Much better macro capability: 4.0 cm vs 10.0 cm

Significant disadvantages of the FE-4040 (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.5"
  • No image stabilization: None vs
    1. Lens
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the FE-4040 and Slice

  • Fairly small: Super compact (97×56×22 mm) vs Super compact (104×60×17 mm)
  • Thin: 0.9" vs 0.7"
  • Light weight: 137 g vs 158 g

Nikon Coolpix L26

Nikon Coolpix L26
2 years newer
$99

Significant advantages of the L26 (vs the Slice)

  • Much better wide angle: 26 mm vs 35 mm
  • Much wider aperture: f/3.2 vs f/4.8

Significant disadvantages of the L26 (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen
  • Significantly larger: Compact (96×60×29 mm) vs Super compact (104×60×17 mm)

common strengths of the L26 and Slice

  • Larger than average screens: 3" vs 3.5"

Kodak EasyShare Sport C123

Kodak Easyshare Sport C123
1 year newer

Significant advantages of the Sport C123 (vs the Slice)

  • Significantly wider aperture: f/3.9 vs f/4.8
  • Waterproof

Significant disadvantages of the Sport C123 (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 2.4" vs 3.5"
  • No image stabilization: None vs
    1. Lens
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the Sport C123 and Slice

  • Thin: 0.9" vs 0.7"

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FP3

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FP3
similar age
$112

Significant advantages of the DMC-FP3 (vs the Slice)

  • Much wider aperture: f/3.5 vs f/4.8
  • Much longer exposures: 60 seconds vs 8 seconds

Significant disadvantages of the DMC-FP3 (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"

common strengths of the DMC-FP3 and Slice

  • Larger than average screens: 3" vs 3.5"
  • Fairly small: Super compact (99×59×19 mm) vs Super compact (104×60×17 mm)
  • Good image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs
    1. Lens

Canon PowerShot SD630

Canon PowerShot SD630
3 years older

Significant advantages of the SD630 (vs the Slice)

  • Much wider aperture: f/2.8 vs f/4.8
  • Much better macro capability: 3.0 cm vs 10.0 cm

Significant disadvantages of the SD630 (vs the Slice)

  • No image stabilization: None vs
    1. Lens
  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the SD630 and Slice

  • Larger than average screens: 3" vs 3.5"
  • Very small: Super compact (90×57×20 mm) vs Super compact (104×60×17 mm)
  • Thin: 0.8" vs 0.7"

compared toUltra compact competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Kodak Slice compared to ultra compact competitors include: it has a much larger screen (3.5" vs 2.7"), has a touch screen and has a faster max shutter speed (1/2000 of a second vs 1/1600 of a second).

However, on average it has a much narrower aperture (f/4.8 vs f/2.8), records lower quality movies (848 x 480 @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 24fps), has a much narrower wide angle lens (35 mm vs 25 mm), doesn't record high-speed movies (none vs 240 fps) and doesn't record movies in 24p.

Kodak EasyShare M590

Kodak EasyShare M590
7 months newer
$119

Significant advantages of the M590 (vs the Slice)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the M590 (vs the Slice)

  • None found

common strengths of the M590 and Slice

  • None found

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX20

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX20
2 years newer
$228

Significant advantages of the DSC-TX20 (vs the Slice)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-TX20 (vs the Slice)

  • None found

common strengths of the DSC-TX20 and Slice

  • None found

Sony Cyber-shot WX50

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX50
2 years newer
$149

Significant advantages of the WX50 (vs the Slice)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the WX50 (vs the Slice)

  • None found

common strengths of the WX50 and Slice

  • None found

Canon PowerShot ELPH 520 HS

Canon ELPH 520 HS
2 years newer
$210

Significant advantages of the ELPH 520 HS (vs the Slice)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the ELPH 520 HS (vs the Slice)

  • None found

common strengths of the ELPH 520 HS and Slice

  • None found

Panasonic Lumix DMC-XS3

Panasonic Lumix DMC-XS3
3 years newer
$164

Significant advantages of the DMC-XS3 (vs the Slice)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the DMC-XS3 (vs the Slice)

  • None found

common strengths of the DMC-XS3 and Slice

  • None found

Kodak Easyshare M5370

Kodak Easyshare M5370
1 year newer
$280

Significant advantages of the M5370 (vs the Slice)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the M5370 (vs the Slice)

  • None found

common strengths of the M5370 and Slice

  • None found

compared toTravel zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Kodak Slice compared to travel zoom competitors include: it has a much larger screen (3.5" vs 2.7"), is slightly smaller (super compact (104×60×17 mm) vs compact (107×61×28 mm)), has a touch screen and is thinner (0.7" vs 1.1").

However, on average it has a much narrower wide angle lens (35 mm vs 25 mm), has a much narrower aperture (f/4.8 vs f/3.2), lacks built-in panoramas, doesn't take 3D photos and significantly worse macro focusing (10.0 cm vs 3.0 cm).

Canon PowerShot ELPH 140 IS

Canon PowerShot ELPH 140 IS
4 years newer
$318

Significant advantages of the ELPH 140 IS (vs the Slice)

  • Much better wide angle: 28 mm vs 35 mm
  • Much wider aperture: f/3.2 vs f/4.8
  • Much better macro capability: 1.0 cm vs 10.0 cm

Significant disadvantages of the ELPH 140 IS (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the ELPH 140 IS and Slice

  • Very small: Super compact (95×54×22 mm) vs Super compact (104×60×17 mm)
  • Very thin: 0.9" vs 0.7"
  • Light weight: 130 g vs 158 g

Kodak EasyShare Z915

Kodak EasyShare Z915
1 year older
$244

Significant advantages of the Z915 (vs the Slice)

  • Much wider aperture: f/3.5 vs f/4.8

Significant disadvantages of the Z915 (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 2.5" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen
  • Much larger: Compact (90×64×39 mm) vs Super compact (104×60×17 mm)

common strengths of the Z915 and Slice

  • None found

Nikon Coolpix S3600

Nikon Coolpix S3600
4 years newer
$80

Significant advantages of the S3600 (vs the Slice)

  • Much better wide angle: 25 mm vs 35 mm
  • Significantly wider aperture: f/3.7 vs f/4.8
  • Much better macro capability: 2.0 cm vs 10.0 cm

Significant disadvantages of the S3600 (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen
  • Significantly slower max shutter speed: 1/1500 of a second vs 1/2000 of a second

common strengths of the S3600 and Slice

  • Very small: Super compact (97×58×20 mm) vs Super compact (104×60×17 mm)
  • Very thin: 0.8" vs 0.7"
  • Light weight: 125 g vs 158 g

Nikon Coolpix S6300

Nikon Coolpix S6300
2 years newer
$290

Significant advantages of the S6300 (vs the Slice)

  • Much better wide angle: 25 mm vs 35 mm
  • Much wider aperture: f/3.2 vs f/4.8
  • Takes 3D photos

Significant disadvantages of the S6300 (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen
  • Significantly thicker: 1" vs 0.7"

common strengths of the S6300 and Slice

  • Fairly small: Compact (94×58×26 mm) vs Super compact (104×60×17 mm)
  • Thin: 1" vs 0.7"
  • Light weight: 160 g vs 158 g

Nikon Coolpix S6200

Nikon Coolpix S6200
1 year newer
$133

Significant advantages of the S6200 (vs the Slice)

  • Much better wide angle: 25 mm vs 35 mm
  • Much wider aperture: f/3.2 vs f/4.8

Significant disadvantages of the S6200 (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen
  • Significantly thicker: 1" vs 0.7"

common strengths of the S6200 and Slice

  • Fairly small: Compact (93×58×26 mm) vs Super compact (104×60×17 mm)
  • Thin: 1" vs 0.7"
  • Light weight: 160 g vs 158 g

Samsung HZ30W

Samsung HZ30W
similar age

Significant advantages of the HZ30W (vs the Slice)

  • Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 35 mm
  • Much wider aperture: f/3.2 vs f/4.8
  • Much better macro capability: 3.0 cm vs 10.0 cm

Significant disadvantages of the HZ30W (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen
  • Significantly larger: Compact (107×61×28 mm) vs Super compact (104×60×17 mm)

common strengths of the HZ30W and Slice

  • Thin: 1.1" vs 0.7"

compared toEntry-level DSLR competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Kodak Slice compared to entry-level DSLR competitors include: it has a much larger screen (3.5" vs 3"), has image stabilization (lens vs none), has a touch screen, is much smaller (super compact (104×60×17 mm) vs professional size (133×100×80 mm)) and is significantly less expensive ($150.99 vs $639.00).

However, on average it records lower quality movies (848 x 480 @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps), takes much lower resolution photos (9.7 MP vs 17.9 MP), doesn't record movies in 24p, doesn't shoot as fast continuously (3 fps vs 5 fps) and doesn't have a screen which flips out.

Canon Rebel T5i

Canon Rebel T5i
3 years newer
$395 - $649 (body only)
$495 - $599 18-55mm lens

Significant advantages of the T5i (vs the Slice)

  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs 848 x 480 @ 30fps
  • Has a viewfinder: Pentamirror vs None
  • Supports 24p

Significant disadvantages of the T5i (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • Much thicker: 3.1" vs 0.7"
  • Much larger: Professional size (133×100×79 mm) vs Super compact (104×60×17 mm)

common strengths of the T5i and Slice

  • Have touch screens
  • Inexpensive: $395.00 vs $150.99

Canon Rebel T3i

Canon Rebel T3i
1 year newer
$639 18-55mm lens

Significant advantages of the T3i (vs the Slice)

  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs 848 x 480 @ 30fps
  • Has a viewfinder: Pentamirror vs None
  • Supports 24p

Significant disadvantages of the T3i (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • Much thicker: 3.1" vs 0.7"
  • Much larger: Professional size (133×100×80 mm) vs Super compact (104×60×17 mm)

common strengths of the T3i and Slice

  • None found

compared toSuper zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Kodak Slice compared to super zoom competitors include: it has a much larger screen (3.5" vs 3"), is significantly smaller (super compact (104×60×17 mm) vs professional size (123×84×98 mm)), has a touch screen, is thinner (0.7" vs 4.1") and is significantly lighter (158 g vs 494 g).

However, on average it has a much narrower aperture (f/4.8 vs f/3), has significantly less zoom (5x vs 41.7x), records lower quality movies (848 x 480 @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps), has a much narrower wide angle lens (35 mm vs 23 mm) and doesn't record high-speed movies (none vs 240 fps).

Nikon Coolpix P500

Nikon Coolpix P500
1 year newer
$450

Significant advantages of the P500 (vs the Slice)

  • Records high-speed movies: 240 fps vs None
  • Much wider aperture: f/3.5 vs f/4.8
  • Much better wide angle: 23 mm vs 35 mm

Significant disadvantages of the P500 (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • Significantly larger: Professional size (116×84×103 mm) vs Super compact (104×60×17 mm)
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the P500 and Slice

  • Light weight: 481 g vs 158 g

Nikon Coolpix P530

Nikon Coolpix P530
4 years newer
$179

Significant advantages of the P530 (vs the Slice)

  • Much wider aperture: f/3 vs f/4.8
  • Records high-speed movies: 120 fps vs None
  • Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 35 mm

Significant disadvantages of the P530 (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • Significantly larger: Professional size (123×84×98 mm) vs Super compact (104×60×17 mm)
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the P530 and Slice

  • Light weight: 494 g vs 158 g
  • Inexpensive: $179.00 vs $150.99