As well as being compared against other compacts, the Kodak Slice is also often compared to travel zooms and entry-level DSLRs. The Kodak Slice's top rivals come from Nikon (such as the Coolpix S6000 and the D3200) and Kodak (such as the EasyShare M580)
Generally, some of the advantages of the Kodak Slice compared to other compact competitors include: it has a much larger screen (3.5" vs 2.7"), is slightly smaller (super compact (104×60×17 mm) vs compact (97×55×25 mm)), has a touch screen and is thinner (0.7" vs 1").
However, on average it has a slightly narrower aperture (f/4.8 vs f/3.7), records lower quality movies (848 x 480 @ 30fps vs 720p @ 30fps) and has a much narrower wide angle lens (35 mm vs 28 mm).
Generally, some of the advantages of the Kodak Slice compared to travel zoom competitors include: it has a much larger screen (3.5" vs 3"), is slightly smaller (super compact (104×60×17 mm) vs compact (101×60×26 mm)), has a touch screen, is thinner (0.7" vs 1") and has a faster max shutter speed (1/2000 of a second vs 1/1400 of a second).
However, on average it has a much narrower wide angle lens (35 mm vs 28 mm) and records lower quality movies (848 x 480 @ 30fps vs 720p @ 30fps).
Generally, some of the advantages of the Kodak Slice compared to entry-level DSLR competitors include: it has a much larger screen (3.5" vs 3"), has image stabilization (lens vs none), has a touch screen, is much smaller (super compact (104×60×17 mm) vs professional size (130×100×78 mm)) and is thinner (0.7" vs 3.1").
However, on average it records lower quality movies (848 x 480 @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps), takes much lower resolution photos (9.7 MP vs 24.1 MP), doesn't record movies in 24p, has a much smaller sensor (1/2.3" 6.18x4.55mm vs APS-C 23.2x15.4mm) and doesn't have a viewfinder (none vs pentamirror).
