As well as being compared against other compacts, the Kodak Slice is also often compared to ultra compacts, entry-level DSLRs, super zooms and travel zooms. The Kodak Slice's top rivals come from Canon (such as the Rebel T5i and the PowerShot SD780 IS) and Kodak (such as the Easyshare M5370 and the EasyShare M590)

compared toCompact competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Kodak Slice compared to other compact competitors include: it has a much larger screen (3.5" vs 3"), has better image stabilization (lens vs digital), has a touch screen, is thinner (0.7" vs 0.8") and is slightly less expensive ($140.99 vs $275.00).

However, on average it has a much narrower aperture (f/4.8 vs f/3.2), records lower quality movies (848 x 480 @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 24fps), has a much narrower wide angle lens (35 mm vs 28 mm), doesn't record high-speed movies (none vs 240 fps) and doesn't record movies in 24p.

Canon PowerShot SD40

Canon PowerShot SD40
3 years older
$199

Significant advantages of the SD40 (vs the Slice)

  • Much wider aperture: f/3.2 vs f/4.8

Significant disadvantages of the SD40 (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 1.8" vs 3.5"
  • No image stabilization: None vs
    1. Lens
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the SD40 and Slice

  • Very small: Super compact (96×45×24 mm) vs Super compact (104×60×17 mm)
  • Thin: 0.9" vs 0.7"
  • Light weight: 120 g vs 158 g

Nikon Coolpix S80

Nikon Coolpix S80
8 months newer
$180

Significant advantages of the S80 (vs the Slice)

  • Much wider aperture: f/3.6 vs f/4.8
  • Has an OLED screen: OLED vs LCD
  • Supports 24p

Significant disadvantages of the S80 (vs the Slice)

  • Significantly slower max shutter speed: 1/1500 of a second vs 1/2000 of a second

common strengths of the S80 and Slice

  • Very large screens: 3.5" vs 3.5"
  • Very small: Super compact (99×63×17 mm) vs Super compact (104×60×17 mm)
  • Good image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs
    1. Lens

Fujifilm FinePix Z90

Fujifilm FinePix Z90
1 year newer
$165

Significant advantages of the Z90 (vs the Slice)

  • Much better wide angle: 28 mm vs 35 mm
  • Significantly wider aperture: f/3.9 vs f/4.8

Significant disadvantages of the Z90 (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • Worse image stabilization:
    1. Digital
    vs
    1. Lens

common strengths of the Z90 and Slice

  • Larger than average screens: 3" vs 3.5"
  • Fairly small: Super compact (95×57×20 mm) vs Super compact (104×60×17 mm)
  • Have touch screens

Canon PowerShot ELPH 110 HS

Canon PowerShot ELPH 110 HS
2 years newer
$275

Significant advantages of the ELPH 110 HS (vs the Slice)

  • Records high-speed movies: 240 fps vs None
  • Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 35 mm
  • Much wider aperture: f/2.7 vs f/4.8

Significant disadvantages of the ELPH 110 HS (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the ELPH 110 HS and Slice

  • Larger than average screens: 3" vs 3.5"
  • Very small: Super compact (93×57×20 mm) vs Super compact (104×60×17 mm)
  • Good image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs
    1. Lens

Canon ELPH 320 HS

Canon PowerShot ELPH 320 HS
2 years newer
$219

Significant advantages of the 320 HS (vs the Slice)

  • Records high-speed movies: 240 fps vs None
  • Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 35 mm
  • Much wider aperture: f/2.7 vs f/4.8

Significant disadvantages of the 320 HS (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 3.2" vs 3.5"

common strengths of the 320 HS and Slice

  • Very large screens: 3.2" vs 3.5"
  • Fairly small: Super compact (94×57×21 mm) vs Super compact (104×60×17 mm)
  • Good image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs
    1. Lens

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T300

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T300
1 year older
$344

Significant advantages of the DSC-T300 (vs the Slice)

  • Much wider aperture: f/3.5 vs f/4.8
  • Much better macro capability: 1.0 cm vs 10.0 cm
  • Better wide angle: 33 mm vs 35 mm

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-T300 (vs the Slice)

  • Much slower max shutter speed: 1/1000 of a second vs 1/2000 of a second

common strengths of the DSC-T300 and Slice

  • Very large screens: 3.5" vs 3.5"
  • Fairly small: Super compact (94×59×21 mm) vs Super compact (104×60×17 mm)
  • Good image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs
    1. Lens

compared toUltra compact competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Kodak Slice compared to ultra compact competitors include: it has a much larger screen (3.5" vs 2.7"), has a touch screen and has a faster max shutter speed (1/2000 of a second vs 1/1200 of a second).

However, on average it has a much narrower aperture (f/4.8 vs f/3.2), records lower quality movies (848 x 480 @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 60fps), has a much narrower wide angle lens (35 mm vs 28 mm), doesn't shoot as fast continuously (3 fps vs 10 fps) and has a CCD-family sensor (CCD vs CMOS).

Canon PowerShot SD780 IS

Canon PowerShot SD780 IS
10 months older
$240

Significant advantages of the SD780 IS (vs the Slice)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the SD780 IS (vs the Slice)

  • None found

common strengths of the SD780 IS and Slice

  • None found

Kodak Easyshare M5370

Kodak Easyshare M5370
1 year newer
$278

Significant advantages of the M5370 (vs the Slice)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the M5370 (vs the Slice)

  • None found

common strengths of the M5370 and Slice

  • None found

Kodak EasyShare M590

Kodak EasyShare M590
7 months newer
$70

Significant advantages of the M590 (vs the Slice)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the M590 (vs the Slice)

  • None found

common strengths of the M590 and Slice

  • None found

Panasonic Lumix DMC-XS3

Panasonic Lumix DMC-XS3
3 years newer
$165

Significant advantages of the DMC-XS3 (vs the Slice)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the DMC-XS3 (vs the Slice)

  • None found

common strengths of the DMC-XS3 and Slice

  • None found

Sony Cyber-shot WX50

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX50
2 years newer
$149

Significant advantages of the WX50 (vs the Slice)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the WX50 (vs the Slice)

  • None found

common strengths of the WX50 and Slice

  • None found

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900
10 months older
$218

Significant advantages of the DSC-T900 (vs the Slice)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-T900 (vs the Slice)

  • None found

common strengths of the DSC-T900 and Slice

  • None found

compared toEntry-level DSLR competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Kodak Slice compared to entry-level DSLR competitors include: it has a much larger screen (3.5" vs 3"), has image stabilization (lens vs none), has a touch screen, is much smaller (super compact (104×60×17 mm) vs professional size (133×100×80 mm)) and is significantly less expensive ($140.99 vs $679.00).

However, on average it records lower quality movies (848 x 480 @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps), takes much lower resolution photos (9.7 MP vs 17.9 MP), doesn't record movies in 24p, doesn't shoot as fast continuously (3 fps vs 5 fps) and doesn't have a screen which flips out.

Canon Rebel T5i

Canon Rebel T5i
3 years newer
$404 - $649 (body only)
$520 - $599 18-55mm lens

Significant advantages of the T5i (vs the Slice)

  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs 848 x 480 @ 30fps
  • Has a viewfinder: Pentamirror vs None
  • Supports 24p

Significant disadvantages of the T5i (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • Much thicker: 3.1" vs 0.7"
  • Much larger: Professional size (133×100×79 mm) vs Super compact (104×60×17 mm)

common strengths of the T5i and Slice

  • Have touch screens
  • Inexpensive: $404.00 vs $140.99

Canon Rebel T3i

Canon Rebel T3i
1 year newer
$699 (body only)
$699 18-55mm lens

Significant advantages of the T3i (vs the Slice)

  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs 848 x 480 @ 30fps
  • Has a viewfinder: Pentamirror vs None
  • Supports 24p

Significant disadvantages of the T3i (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • Much thicker: 3.1" vs 0.7"
  • Much larger: Professional size (133×100×80 mm) vs Super compact (104×60×17 mm)

common strengths of the T3i and Slice

  • None found

Canon Rebel T4i

Canon Rebel T4i
2 years newer
$699 (body only)
$679 18-55mm lens

Significant advantages of the T4i (vs the Slice)

  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs 848 x 480 @ 30fps
  • Has a viewfinder: Pentamirror vs None
  • Supports 24p

Significant disadvantages of the T4i (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • Much thicker: 3.1" vs 0.7"
  • Much larger: Professional size (133×100×79 mm) vs Super compact (104×60×17 mm)

common strengths of the T4i and Slice

  • Have touch screens

compared toSuper zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Kodak Slice compared to super zoom competitors include: it has a much larger screen (3.5" vs 3"), is significantly smaller (super compact (104×60×17 mm) vs prosumer size (119×86×98 mm)), has a touch screen, is thinner (0.7" vs 3.8") and is significantly lighter (158 g vs 470 g).

However, on average it has a much narrower aperture (f/4.8 vs f/3), has significantly less zoom (5x vs 41.7x), records lower quality movies (848 x 480 @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps), has a much narrower wide angle lens (35 mm vs 23 mm) and doesn't record high-speed movies (none vs 120 fps).

Canon PowerShot SX410 IS

Canon PowerShot SX410 IS
5 years newer
$179

Significant advantages of the SX410 IS (vs the Slice)

  • Much wider aperture: f/3.5 vs f/4.8
  • Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 35 mm
  • Significantly more zoom: 40x vs 5x

Significant disadvantages of the SX410 IS (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen
  • Larger: Standard size (104×69×85 mm) vs Super compact (104×60×17 mm)

common strengths of the SX410 IS and Slice

  • Fairly small: Standard size (104×69×85 mm) vs Super compact (104×60×17 mm)
  • Light weight: 325 g vs 158 g
  • Thin: 3.3" vs 0.7"

Kodak PixPro AZ361

Kodak PixPro AZ361
3 years newer
$151

Significant advantages of the AZ361 (vs the Slice)

  • Much wider aperture: f/2.9 vs f/4.8
  • Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 35 mm
  • More zoom: 36x vs 5x

Significant disadvantages of the AZ361 (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen
  • Significantly larger: Prosumer size (113×82×77 mm) vs Super compact (104×60×17 mm)

common strengths of the AZ361 and Slice

  • Fairly small: Prosumer size (113×82×77 mm) vs Super compact (104×60×17 mm)
  • Thin: 3" vs 0.7"
  • Light weight: 416 g vs 158 g

Nikon Coolpix L820

Nikon Coolpix L820
3 years newer
$180

Significant advantages of the L820 (vs the Slice)

  • Records high-speed movies: 240 fps vs None
  • Much wider aperture: f/3 vs f/4.8
  • Much better wide angle: 23 mm vs 35 mm

Significant disadvantages of the L820 (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen
  • Significantly larger: Prosumer size (111×76×85 mm) vs Super compact (104×60×17 mm)

common strengths of the L820 and Slice

  • Fairly small: Prosumer size (111×76×85 mm) vs Super compact (104×60×17 mm)
  • Thin: 3.3" vs 0.7"
  • Light weight: 470 g vs 158 g

Nikon Coolpix P530

Nikon Coolpix P530
4 years newer
$199

Significant advantages of the P530 (vs the Slice)

  • Much wider aperture: f/3 vs f/4.8
  • Records high-speed movies: 120 fps vs None
  • Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 35 mm

Significant disadvantages of the P530 (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • Significantly larger: Professional size (123×84×98 mm) vs Super compact (104×60×17 mm)
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the P530 and Slice

  • Light weight: 494 g vs 158 g
  • Inexpensive: $199.00 vs $140.99

Kodak PixPro AZ521

Kodak PixPro AZ521
3 years newer
$345

Significant advantages of the AZ521 (vs the Slice)

  • Much wider aperture: f/2.9 vs f/4.8
  • Records high-speed movies: 120 fps vs None
  • Much more zoom: 52x vs 5x

Significant disadvantages of the AZ521 (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • Significantly larger: Prosumer size (119×86×98 mm) vs Super compact (104×60×17 mm)
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the AZ521 and Slice

  • Inexpensive: $344.85 vs $140.99

compared toTravel zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Kodak Slice compared to travel zoom competitors include: it has a much larger screen (3.5" vs 3"), has a touch screen and is thinner (0.7" vs 1.8").

However, on average it has a much narrower wide angle lens (35 mm vs 25 mm), has a much narrower aperture (f/4.8 vs f/3.4), doesn't have a built-in GPS, records lower quality movies (848 x 480 @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 24fps) and doesn't record high-speed movies (none vs 220 fps).

Panasonic Lumix DMC-TZ60

Panasonic Lumix DMC-TZ60
4 years newer
$251

Significant advantages of the DMC-TZ60 (vs the Slice)

  • Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 35 mm
  • Takes 3D photos
  • Much wider aperture: f/3.3 vs f/4.8

Significant disadvantages of the DMC-TZ60 (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the DMC-TZ60 and Slice

  • Larger than average screens: 3" vs 3.5"

Panasonic Lumix ZS25

Panasonic Lumix ZS25
3 years newer
$320

Significant advantages of the ZS25 (vs the Slice)

  • Records high-speed movies: 220 fps vs None
  • Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 35 mm
  • Takes 3D photos

Significant disadvantages of the ZS25 (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the ZS25 and Slice

  • Larger than average screens: 3" vs 3.5"

Canon PowerShot SX150 IS

Canon PowerShot SX150 IS
1 year newer
$163

Significant advantages of the SX150 IS (vs the Slice)

  • Much wider aperture: f/3.4 vs f/4.8
  • Significantly better wide angle: 28 mm vs 35 mm
  • Much better macro capability: 1.0 cm vs 10.0 cm

Significant disadvantages of the SX150 IS (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the SX150 IS and Slice

  • Larger than average screens: 3" vs 3.5"

Canon PowerShot SX270 HS

Canon PowerShot SX270 HS
3 years newer
$187

Significant advantages of the SX270 HS (vs the Slice)

  • Records high-speed movies: 240 fps vs None
  • Much better wide angle: 25 mm vs 35 mm
  • Much wider aperture: f/3.5 vs f/4.8

Significant disadvantages of the SX270 HS (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the SX270 HS and Slice

  • Larger than average screens: 3" vs 3.5"

Canon PowerShot SX260 HS

Canon PowerShot SX260 HS
2 years newer
$450

Significant advantages of the SX260 HS (vs the Slice)

  • Records high-speed movies: 240 fps vs None
  • Much better wide angle: 25 mm vs 35 mm
  • Has a GPS

Significant disadvantages of the SX260 HS (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the SX260 HS and Slice

  • Larger than average screens: 3" vs 3.5"