As well as being compared against other compacts, the Kodak Slice is also often compared to ultra compacts, travel zooms, entry-level DSLRs and super zooms. The Kodak Slice's top rivals come from Canon (such as the ELPH 100 HS and the ELPH 300 HS) and Sony (such as the Cyber-shot DSC-TX1 and the Cyber-shot DSC-TX100v)

compared toCompact competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Kodak Slice compared to other compact competitors include: it has a slightly larger screen (3.5" vs 3.0") and has a touch screen.

However, on average it has a much narrower aperture (f/4.8 vs f/2.8), records lower quality movies (848 x 480 @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 24fps), has a significantly narrower wide angle lens (35 mm vs 27 mm), doesn't record high-speed movies (none vs 240 fps) and doesn't record movies in 24p.

Canon ELPH 100 HS

Canon ELPH 100 HS
1 year newer
$90 - $180

Significant advantages of the 100 HS (vs the Slice)

  • Much wider aperture: f/2.8 vs f/4.8
  • Significantly better wide angle: 28 mm vs 35 mm
  • Supports 24p

Significant disadvantages of the 100 HS (vs the Slice)

  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen
  • Slower max shutter speed: 1/1500 of a second vs 1/2000 of a second

common strengths of the 100 HS and Slice

  • Fairly small: Super compact 93x55x19 mm vs Super compact 104x60x17 mm
  • Good image stabilization: Lens vs Lens
  • Thin: 0.8" vs 0.7"

Nikon Coolpix S80

Nikon Coolpix S80
8 months newer
$130

Significant advantages of the S80 (vs the Slice)

  • Significantly wider aperture: f/3.6 vs f/4.8
  • Has an OLED screen: OLED vs LCD
  • Supports 24p

Significant disadvantages of the S80 (vs the Slice)

  • Slower max shutter speed: 1/1500 of a second vs 1/2000 of a second

common strengths of the S80 and Slice

  • Very large screens: 3.5" vs 3.5"
  • Fairly small: Super compact 99x63x17 mm vs Super compact 104x60x17 mm
  • Good image stabilization: Lens vs Lens

Fujifilm FinePix Z90

Fujifilm FinePix Z90
1 year newer
$110

Significant advantages of the Z90 (vs the Slice)

  • Significantly wider aperture: f/3.9 vs f/4.8
  • Significantly better wide angle: 28 mm vs 35 mm

Significant disadvantages of the Z90 (vs the Slice)

  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • Worse image stabilization: Digital vs Lens

common strengths of the Z90 and Slice

  • Fairly small: Super compact 95x56x20 mm vs Super compact 104x60x17 mm
  • Have touch screens
  • Thin: 0.8" vs 0.7"

Canon ELPH 300 HS

Canon ELPH 300 HS
1 year newer
$229

Significant advantages of the 300 HS (vs the Slice)

  • Much wider aperture: f/2.7 vs f/4.8
  • Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 35 mm
  • Supports 24p

Significant disadvantages of the 300 HS (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the 300 HS and Slice

  • Fairly small: Super compact 92x55x19 mm vs Super compact 104x60x17 mm
  • Good image stabilization: Lens vs Lens
  • Thin: 0.8" vs 0.7"

Canon PowerShot SD3500 IS

Canon PowerShot SD3500 IS
similar age
$269

Significant advantages of the SD3500 IS (vs the Slice)

  • Much wider aperture: f/2.8 vs f/4.8
  • Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 35 mm
  • Much better macro capability: 3 cm vs 10 cm

Significant disadvantages of the SD3500 IS (vs the Slice)

  • None found

common strengths of the SD3500 IS and Slice

  • Very large screens: 3.5" vs 3.5"
  • Fairly small: Super compact 99x56x22 mm vs Super compact 104x60x17 mm
  • Good image stabilization: Lens vs Lens

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX100v

Sony Cybershot DSC-TX100V
1 year newer
$80

Significant advantages of the DSC-TX100v (vs the Slice)

  • Much wider aperture: f/3.5 vs f/4.8
  • Significantly better wide angle: 27 mm vs 35 mm
  • Has an OLED screen: OLED vs LCD

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-TX100v (vs the Slice)

  • None found

common strengths of the DSC-TX100v and Slice

  • Very large screens: 3.5" vs 3.5"
  • Fairly small: Super compact 96x58x17 mm vs Super compact 104x60x17 mm
  • Good image stabilization: Lens vs Lens

compared toUltra compact competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Kodak Slice compared to ultra compact competitors include: it has a much larger screen (3.5" vs 2.7"), has a touch screen and has a faster max shutter speed (1/2000 of a second vs 1/1250 of a second).

However, on average it has a much narrower aperture (f/4.8 vs f/2.8), records lower quality movies (848 x 480 @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 24fps), has a slightly narrower wide angle lens (35 mm vs 28 mm), doesn't record movies in 24p and has a CCD-family sensor (CCD vs CMOS).

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX1

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX1
5 months older
$90

Significant advantages of the DSC-TX1 (vs the Slice)

  • Much wider aperture: f/3.5 vs f/4.8
  • Much better macro capability: 1 cm vs 10 cm
  • Has a CMOS-family sensor: CMOS vs CCD

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-TX1 (vs the Slice)

  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • Significantly slower max shutter speed: 1/1250 of a second vs 1/2000 of a second

common strengths of the DSC-TX1 and Slice

  • Each has a built-in flash
  • Larger than average screens: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • Very good image stabilization: Lens vs Lens

Kodak EasyShare M590

Kodak EasyShare M590
7 months newer
$119

Significant advantages of the M590 (vs the Slice)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the M590 (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen
  • Much slower max shutter speed: 1/1200 of a second vs 1/2000 of a second

common strengths of the M590 and Slice

  • Each has a built-in flash
  • Very good image stabilization: Lens vs Lens
  • Thin: 0.6" vs 0.7"

Panasonic Lumix DMC-XS3

Panasonic Lumix DMC-XS3
3 years newer
$98

Significant advantages of the DMC-XS3 (vs the Slice)

  • Much wider aperture: f/2.8 vs f/4.8
  • Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 35 mm
  • Higher resolution movies: 1980 x 1080 vs 848 x 480 @ 30fps

Significant disadvantages of the DMC-XS3 (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the DMC-XS3 and Slice

  • Each has a built-in flash
  • Very good image stabilization: Lens vs Lens
  • Thin: 0.7" vs 0.7"

Panasonic Lumix DMC-XS1

Panasonic Lumix DMC-XS1
3 years newer
$131

Significant advantages of the DMC-XS1 (vs the Slice)

  • Much wider aperture: f/2.8 vs f/4.8
  • Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 35 mm
  • Can create panoramas in-camera

Significant disadvantages of the DMC-XS1 (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the DMC-XS1 and Slice

  • Each has a built-in flash
  • Very good image stabilization: Lens vs Lens
  • Thin: 0.7" vs 0.7"

Canon PowerShot ELPH 520 HS

Canon ELPH 520 HS
2 years newer
$150 - $189

Significant advantages of the ELPH 520 HS (vs the Slice)

  • Much wider aperture: f/3.4 vs f/4.8
  • Significantly better wide angle: 28 mm vs 35 mm
  • Supports 24p

Significant disadvantages of the ELPH 520 HS (vs the Slice)

  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the ELPH 520 HS and Slice

  • Each has a built-in flash
  • Larger than average screens: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • Very good image stabilization: Lens vs Lens

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T77

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T77
1 year older
$260

Significant advantages of the DSC-T77 (vs the Slice)

  • Much wider aperture: f/3.5 vs f/4.8
  • Much better macro capability: 1 cm vs 10 cm

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-T77 (vs the Slice)

  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • Much slower max shutter speed: 1/1000 of a second vs 1/2000 of a second

common strengths of the DSC-T77 and Slice

  • Each has a built-in flash
  • Larger than average screens: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • Very good image stabilization: Lens vs Lens

compared toTravel zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Kodak Slice compared to travel zoom competitors include: it has a significantly larger screen (3.5" vs 2.7"), is significantly smaller (super compact 104x60x17 mm vs compact 106x63x33 mm), has a touch screen, is thinner (0.7" vs 1.3") and is slightly lighter (158 g vs 206 g).

However, on average it has much less zoom (5x vs 20x), has a much narrower wide angle lens (35 mm vs 25 mm), has a much narrower aperture (f/4.8 vs f/3.3), doesn't have a built-in GPS and records lower quality movies (848 x 480 @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps).

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH20

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH20
similar age

Significant advantages of the DMC-FH20 (vs the Slice)

  • Much wider aperture: f/3.3 vs f/4.8
  • Significantly better wide angle: 28 mm vs 35 mm
  • Much better macro capability: 5 cm vs 10 cm

Significant disadvantages of the DMC-FH20 (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen
  • Larger: Compact 100x56x28 mm vs Super compact 104x60x17 mm

common strengths of the DMC-FH20 and Slice

  • Fairly small: Compact 100x56x28 mm vs Super compact 104x60x17 mm

Panasonic Lumix ZS20

Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS20
2 years newer
$300

Significant advantages of the ZS20 (vs the Slice)

  • Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 35 mm
  • Has a GPS
  • Much wider aperture: f/3.3 vs f/4.8

Significant disadvantages of the ZS20 (vs the Slice)

  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • Significantly larger: Compact 105x59x28 mm vs Super compact 104x60x17 mm
  • Significantly thicker: 1.1" vs 0.7"

common strengths of the ZS20 and Slice

  • Have touch screens

Panasonic Lumix ZS25

Panasonic Lumix ZS25
3 years newer
$220 - $240

Significant advantages of the ZS25 (vs the Slice)

  • Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 35 mm
  • Much wider aperture: f/3.3 vs f/4.8
  • Significantly more zoom: 20x vs 5x

Significant disadvantages of the ZS25 (vs the Slice)

  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen
  • Significantly larger: Compact 104x58x28 mm vs Super compact 104x60x17 mm

common strengths of the ZS25 and Slice

  • None found

Nikon Coolpix S9700

Nikon Coolpix S9700
4 years newer
$222 - $300

Significant advantages of the S9700 (vs the Slice)

  • Much more zoom: 30x vs 5x
  • Much better wide angle: 25 mm vs 35 mm
  • Has a GPS

Significant disadvantages of the S9700 (vs the Slice)

  • Much larger: Compact 109x63x34 mm vs Super compact 104x60x17 mm
  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the S9700 and Slice

  • None found

Canon PowerShot SX270 HS

Canon PowerShot SX270 HS
3 years newer
$325

Significant advantages of the SX270 HS (vs the Slice)

  • Much better wide angle: 25 mm vs 35 mm
  • Much wider aperture: f/3.5 vs f/4.8
  • Significantly more zoom: 20x vs 5x

Significant disadvantages of the SX270 HS (vs the Slice)

  • Much larger: Compact 106x63x33 mm vs Super compact 104x60x17 mm
  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the SX270 HS and Slice

  • None found

Canon PowerShot ELPH 130 IS

Canon PowerShot ELPH 130 IS
3 years newer
$128 - $237

Significant advantages of the ELPH 130 IS (vs the Slice)

  • Much wider aperture: f/3.2 vs f/4.8
  • Significantly better wide angle: 28 mm vs 35 mm
  • Much better macro capability: 1 cm vs 10 cm

Significant disadvantages of the ELPH 130 IS (vs the Slice)

  • None found

common strengths of the ELPH 130 IS and Slice

  • Fairly small: Super compact 95x56x21 mm vs Super compact 104x60x17 mm
  • Thin: 0.8" vs 0.7"
  • Light weight: 133 g vs 158 g

compared toEntry-level DSLR competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Kodak Slice compared to entry-level DSLR competitors include: it has a much larger screen (3.5" vs 3.0"), has image stabilization (lens vs none), has a touch screen, is much smaller (super compact 104x60x17 mm vs professional size 133x99x79 mm) and is much less expensive ($104.99 vs $589.89).

However, on average it records lower quality movies (848 x 480 @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps), takes much lower resolution photos (9.7 MP vs 17.9 MP), doesn't record movies in 24p, doesn't shoot as fast continuously (3 fps vs 5 fps) and doesn't have a screen which flips out.

Canon Rebel T5i

Canon Rebel T5i
3 years newer
$599 - $699 (body only)
$590 - $750 18-55mm lens

Significant advantages of the T5i (vs the Slice)

  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs 848 x 480 @ 30fps
  • Has a viewfinder: Pentamirror vs None
  • Faster autofocus: Phase detection vs Contrast detection

Significant disadvantages of the T5i (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • Much larger: Professional size 133x100x79 mm vs Super compact 104x60x17 mm
  • No image stabilization: None vs Lens

common strengths of the T5i and Slice

  • Have touch screens

Canon Rebel T3i

Canon Rebel T3i
1 year newer
$499 - $550 (body only)
$550 - $600 18-55mm lens

Significant advantages of the T3i (vs the Slice)

  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs 848 x 480 @ 30fps
  • Has a viewfinder: Pentamirror vs None
  • Faster autofocus: Phase detection vs Contrast detection

Significant disadvantages of the T3i (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • Much larger: Professional size 133x99x79 mm vs Super compact 104x60x17 mm
  • No image stabilization: None vs Lens

common strengths of the T3i and Slice

  • None found

compared toSuper zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Kodak Slice compared to super zoom competitors include: it has a significantly larger screen (3.5" vs 3.0"), is significantly smaller (super compact 104x60x17 mm vs professional size 124x86x93 mm), has a touch screen, is thinner (0.7" vs 3.7") and is significantly lighter (158 g vs 589 g).

However, on average it has a much narrower aperture (f/4.8 vs f/2.8), has slightly less zoom (5x vs 30x), records lower quality movies (848 x 480 @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps), has a much narrower wide angle lens (35 mm vs 23 mm) and doesn't record high-speed movies (none vs 240 fps).

Kodak Easyshare Z990 MAX

Kodak Easyshare Z990 MAX
1 year newer

Significant advantages of the Z990 MAX (vs the Slice)

  • Much wider aperture: f/2.8 vs f/4.8
  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs 848 x 480 @ 30fps
  • Significantly better wide angle: 28 mm vs 35 mm

Significant disadvantages of the Z990 MAX (vs the Slice)

  • Much larger: Professional size 124x86x93 mm vs Super compact 104x60x17 mm
  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the Z990 MAX and Slice

  • None found

Nikon Coolpix L820

Nikon Coolpix L820
3 years newer
$149 - $270

Significant advantages of the L820 (vs the Slice)

  • Much wider aperture: f/3.0 vs f/4.8
  • Much better wide angle: 23 mm vs 35 mm
  • Takes 3D photos

Significant disadvantages of the L820 (vs the Slice)

  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen
  • Significantly larger: Prosumer size 111x76x85 mm vs Super compact 104x60x17 mm

common strengths of the L820 and Slice

  • Fairly small: Prosumer size 111x76x85 mm vs Super compact 104x60x17 mm
  • Light weight: 470 g vs 158 g
  • Inexpensive: $149.00 vs $104.99