As well as being compared against other compacts, the Kodak Slice is also often compared to ultra compacts, super zooms, travel zooms and entry-level DSLRs. The Kodak Slice's top rivals come from Canon (such as the PowerShot SX410 IS and the PowerShot SD40) and Kodak (such as the EasyShare M590 and the EasyShare Z915)

compared toCompact competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Kodak Slice compared to other compact competitors include: it has a much larger screen (3.5" vs 2.7"), has better image stabilization (lens vs none), has a touch screen and is thinner (0.7" vs 0.9").

However, on average it has a much narrower aperture (f/4.8 vs f/2.7), records lower quality movies (848 x 480 @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 24fps), has a much narrower wide angle lens (35 mm vs 25 mm), doesn't record high-speed movies (none vs 240 fps) and doesn't record movies in 24p.

Canon PowerShot SD40

Canon PowerShot SD40
3 years older
$199

Significant advantages of the SD40 (vs the Slice)

  • Much wider aperture: f/3.2 vs f/4.8

Significant disadvantages of the SD40 (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 1.8" vs 3.5"
  • No image stabilization: None vs
    1. Lens
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the SD40 and Slice

  • Very small: Super compact (96×45×24 mm) vs Super compact (104×60×17 mm)
  • Thin: 0.9" vs 0.7"
  • Light weight: 120 g vs 158 g

Sony Cybershot W520

Sony Cybershot DSC-W520
1 year newer
$153

Significant advantages of the W520 (vs the Slice)

  • Much better wide angle: 25 mm vs 35 mm
  • Much wider aperture: f/3.3 vs f/4.8
  • Much better macro capability: 5.0 cm vs 10.0 cm

Significant disadvantages of the W520 (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the W520 and Slice

  • Very small: Super compact (96×56×21 mm) vs Super compact (104×60×17 mm)
  • Good image stabilization:
    1. Digital
    2. Lens
    vs
    1. Lens
  • Thin: 0.8" vs 0.7"

Nikon Coolpix P310

Nikon Coolpix P310
2 years newer
$349

Significant advantages of the P310 (vs the Slice)

  • Much wider aperture: f/1.8 vs f/4.8
  • Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 35 mm
  • Much better macro capability: 2.0 cm vs 10.0 cm

Significant disadvantages of the P310 (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen
  • Much larger: Compact (103×58×32 mm) vs Super compact (104×60×17 mm)

common strengths of the P310 and Slice

  • Larger than average screens: 3" vs 3.5"
  • Good image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs
    1. Lens

Canon ELPH 320 HS

Canon PowerShot ELPH 320 HS
2 years newer
$174

Significant advantages of the 320 HS (vs the Slice)

  • Records high-speed movies: 240 fps vs None
  • Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 35 mm
  • Much wider aperture: f/2.7 vs f/4.8

Significant disadvantages of the 320 HS (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 3.2" vs 3.5"

common strengths of the 320 HS and Slice

  • Very large screens: 3.2" vs 3.5"
  • Very small: Super compact (94×57×21 mm) vs Super compact (104×60×17 mm)
  • Good image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs
    1. Lens

Canon ELPH 300 HS

Canon ELPH 300 HS
1 year newer
$275

Significant advantages of the 300 HS (vs the Slice)

  • Records high-speed movies: 240 fps vs None
  • Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 35 mm
  • Much wider aperture: f/2.7 vs f/4.8

Significant disadvantages of the 300 HS (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the 300 HS and Slice

  • Very small: Super compact (92×56×20 mm) vs Super compact (104×60×17 mm)
  • Good image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs
    1. Lens
  • Very thin: 0.8" vs 0.7"

Nikon Coolpix S80

Nikon Coolpix S80
8 months newer
$180

Significant advantages of the S80 (vs the Slice)

  • Significantly wider aperture: f/3.6 vs f/4.8
  • Has an OLED screen: OLED vs LCD
  • Supports 24p

Significant disadvantages of the S80 (vs the Slice)

  • Significantly slower max shutter speed: 1/1500 of a second vs 1/2000 of a second

common strengths of the S80 and Slice

  • Very large screens: 3.5" vs 3.5"
  • Very small: Super compact (99×63×17 mm) vs Super compact (104×60×17 mm)
  • Good image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs
    1. Lens

compared toUltra compact competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Kodak Slice compared to ultra compact competitors include: it has a much larger screen (3.5" vs 2.7"), has better image stabilization (lens vs sensor shift), has a touch screen and has a faster max shutter speed (1/2000 of a second vs 1/1500 of a second).

However, on average it has a much narrower aperture (f/4.8 vs f/2.8), has a much narrower wide angle lens (35 mm vs 28 mm), lacks built-in panoramas, much worse macro focusing (10.0 cm vs 5.0 cm) and is older (january 2010 vs september 2011).

Kodak EasyShare M590

Kodak EasyShare M590
7 months newer
$119

Significant advantages of the M590 (vs the Slice)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the M590 (vs the Slice)

  • None found

common strengths of the M590 and Slice

  • None found

Canon PowerShot SD780 IS

Canon PowerShot SD780 IS
10 months older
$240

Significant advantages of the SD780 IS (vs the Slice)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the SD780 IS (vs the Slice)

  • None found

common strengths of the SD780 IS and Slice

  • None found

Panasonic Lumix DMC-XS3

Panasonic Lumix DMC-XS3
3 years newer

Significant advantages of the DMC-XS3 (vs the Slice)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the DMC-XS3 (vs the Slice)

  • None found

common strengths of the DMC-XS3 and Slice

  • None found

Panasonic Lumix DMC-XS1

Panasonic Lumix DMC-XS1
3 years newer
$117 - $118

Significant advantages of the DMC-XS1 (vs the Slice)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the DMC-XS1 (vs the Slice)

  • None found

common strengths of the DMC-XS1 and Slice

  • None found

Kodak Easyshare M5370

Kodak Easyshare M5370
1 year newer
$179

Significant advantages of the M5370 (vs the Slice)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the M5370 (vs the Slice)

  • None found

common strengths of the M5370 and Slice

  • None found

Nikon Coolpix S3100

Nikon Coolpix S3100
1 year newer
$149

Significant advantages of the S3100 (vs the Slice)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the S3100 (vs the Slice)

  • None found

common strengths of the S3100 and Slice

  • None found

compared toSuper zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Kodak Slice compared to super zoom competitors include: it has a much larger screen (3.5" vs 3"), is significantly smaller (super compact (104×60×17 mm) vs prosumer size (119×86×98 mm)), has a touch screen, is thinner (0.7" vs 3.6") and is slightly lighter (158 g vs 508 g).

However, on average it has a much narrower aperture (f/4.8 vs f/3), has significantly less zoom (5x vs 52x), has a much narrower wide angle lens (35 mm vs 22 mm), doesn't record high-speed movies (none vs 120 fps) and has a CCD-family sensor (CCD vs CMOS).

Canon PowerShot SX410 IS

Canon PowerShot SX410 IS
5 years newer
$199

Significant advantages of the SX410 IS (vs the Slice)

  • Much wider aperture: f/3.5 vs f/4.8
  • Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 35 mm
  • Significantly more zoom: 40x vs 5x

Significant disadvantages of the SX410 IS (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen
  • Larger: Standard size (104×69×85 mm) vs Super compact (104×60×17 mm)

common strengths of the SX410 IS and Slice

  • Fairly small: Standard size (104×69×85 mm) vs Super compact (104×60×17 mm)
  • Good image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs
    1. Lens
  • Light weight: 325 g vs 158 g

Nikon Coolpix L830

Nikon Coolpix L830
4 years newer
$199

Significant advantages of the L830 (vs the Slice)

  • Records high-speed movies: 240 fps vs None
  • Much wider aperture: f/3 vs f/4.8
  • Much better wide angle: 22 mm vs 35 mm

Significant disadvantages of the L830 (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • Significantly larger: Prosumer size (111×76×91 mm) vs Super compact (104×60×17 mm)
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the L830 and Slice

  • Fairly small: Prosumer size (111×76×91 mm) vs Super compact (104×60×17 mm)
  • Good image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs
    1. Lens
  • Inexpensive: $199.00 vs $140.99

Kodak PixPro AZ521

Kodak PixPro AZ521
3 years newer
$278

Significant advantages of the AZ521 (vs the Slice)

  • Much wider aperture: f/2.9 vs f/4.8
  • Much more zoom: 52x vs 5x
  • Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 35 mm

Significant disadvantages of the AZ521 (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • Significantly larger: Prosumer size (119×86×98 mm) vs Super compact (104×60×17 mm)
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the AZ521 and Slice

  • Good image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs
    1. Lens
  • Inexpensive: $278.10 vs $140.99

Kodak PixPro AZ361

Kodak PixPro AZ361
3 years newer
$160

Significant advantages of the AZ361 (vs the Slice)

  • Much wider aperture: f/2.9 vs f/4.8
  • Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 35 mm
  • More zoom: 36x vs 5x

Significant disadvantages of the AZ361 (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • Significantly larger: Prosumer size (113×82×77 mm) vs Super compact (104×60×17 mm)
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the AZ361 and Slice

  • Fairly small: Prosumer size (113×82×77 mm) vs Super compact (104×60×17 mm)
  • Good image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs
    1. Lens
  • Thin: 3" vs 0.7"

compared toTravel zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Kodak Slice compared to travel zoom competitors include: it has a much larger screen (3.5" vs 2.7"), is significantly smaller (super compact (104×60×17 mm) vs compact (105×59×28 mm)), has a touch screen, is thinner (0.7" vs 1.3") and is slightly lighter (158 g vs 194 g).

However, on average it has slightly less zoom (5x vs 15x), has a much narrower wide angle lens (35 mm vs 25 mm), has a much narrower aperture (f/4.8 vs f/3.3), doesn't have a built-in GPS and records lower quality movies (848 x 480 @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 24fps).

Kodak EasyShare Z915

Kodak EasyShare Z915
1 year older
$260

Significant advantages of the Z915 (vs the Slice)

  • Much wider aperture: f/3.5 vs f/4.8

Significant disadvantages of the Z915 (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 2.5" vs 3.5"
  • Much larger: Compact (90×64×39 mm) vs Super compact (104×60×17 mm)
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the Z915 and Slice

  • Light weight: 194 g vs 158 g

Nikon Coolpix S3600

Nikon Coolpix S3600
4 years newer
$90

Significant advantages of the S3600 (vs the Slice)

  • Much better wide angle: 25 mm vs 35 mm
  • Significantly wider aperture: f/3.7 vs f/4.8
  • Much better macro capability: 2.0 cm vs 10.0 cm

Significant disadvantages of the S3600 (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen
  • Significantly slower max shutter speed: 1/1500 of a second vs 1/2000 of a second

common strengths of the S3600 and Slice

  • Very small: Super compact (97×58×20 mm) vs Super compact (104×60×17 mm)
  • Very thin: 0.8" vs 0.7"
  • Light weight: 125 g vs 158 g

Canon IXUS 132

Canon IXUS 132
3 years newer
$210

Significant advantages of the IXUS 132 (vs the Slice)

  • Much better wide angle: 28 mm vs 35 mm
  • Much wider aperture: f/3.2 vs f/4.8
  • Much better macro capability: 1.0 cm vs 10.0 cm

Significant disadvantages of the IXUS 132 (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen
  • Worse image stabilization:
    1. Sensor shift
    vs
    1. Lens

common strengths of the IXUS 132 and Slice

  • Very small: Super compact (93×52×22 mm) vs Super compact (104×60×17 mm)
  • Very thin: 0.9" vs 0.7"
  • Light weight: 133 g vs 158 g

Panasonic Lumix ZS30

Panasonic Lumix ZS30
3 years newer
$220

Significant advantages of the ZS30 (vs the Slice)

  • Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 35 mm
  • Records high-speed movies: 220 fps vs None
  • Much wider aperture: f/3.3 vs f/4.8

Significant disadvantages of the ZS30 (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • Significantly larger: Compact (105×59×28 mm) vs Super compact (104×60×17 mm)
  • Much thicker: 1.1" vs 0.7"

common strengths of the ZS30 and Slice

  • Fairly small: Compact (105×59×28 mm) vs Super compact (104×60×17 mm)
  • Have touch screens
  • Thin: 1.1" vs 0.7"

Samsung HZ30W

Samsung HZ30W
similar age

Significant advantages of the HZ30W (vs the Slice)

  • Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 35 mm
  • Much wider aperture: f/3.2 vs f/4.8
  • Much better macro capability: 3.0 cm vs 10.0 cm

Significant disadvantages of the HZ30W (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen
  • Significantly larger: Compact (107×61×28 mm) vs Super compact (104×60×17 mm)

common strengths of the HZ30W and Slice

  • Fairly small: Compact (107×61×28 mm) vs Super compact (104×60×17 mm)
  • Thin: 1.1" vs 0.7"

Canon PowerShot SX260 HS

Canon PowerShot SX260 HS
2 years newer
$300

Significant advantages of the SX260 HS (vs the Slice)

  • Much better wide angle: 25 mm vs 35 mm
  • Records high-speed movies: 240 fps vs None
  • Much wider aperture: f/3.5 vs f/4.8

Significant disadvantages of the SX260 HS (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • Much larger: Compact (106×61×33 mm) vs Super compact (104×60×17 mm)
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the SX260 HS and Slice

  • None found

compared toEntry-level DSLR competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Kodak Slice compared to entry-level DSLR competitors include: it has a much larger screen (3.5" vs 3"), has image stabilization (lens vs none), has a touch screen, is much smaller (super compact (104×60×17 mm) vs professional size (133×100×79 mm)) and is significantly less expensive ($140.99 vs $679.00).

However, on average it records lower quality movies (848 x 480 @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps), takes much lower resolution photos (9.7 MP vs 24.1 MP), doesn't record movies in 24p, doesn't shoot as fast continuously (3 fps vs 5 fps) and doesn't have a screen which flips out.

Canon Rebel T5i

Canon Rebel T5i
3 years newer
$429 - $649 (body only)
$520 - $649 18-55mm lens

Significant advantages of the T5i (vs the Slice)

  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs 848 x 480 @ 30fps
  • Has a viewfinder: Pentamirror vs None
  • Supports 24p

Significant disadvantages of the T5i (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • Much thicker: 3.1" vs 0.7"
  • Much larger: Professional size (133×100×79 mm) vs Super compact (104×60×17 mm)

common strengths of the T5i and Slice

  • Have touch screens
  • Inexpensive: $429.00 vs $140.99

Canon Rebel T4i

Canon Rebel T4i
2 years newer
$699 (body only)
$679 18-55mm lens

Significant advantages of the T4i (vs the Slice)

  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs 848 x 480 @ 30fps
  • Has a viewfinder: Pentamirror vs None
  • Supports 24p

Significant disadvantages of the T4i (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • Much thicker: 3.1" vs 0.7"
  • Much larger: Professional size (133×100×79 mm) vs Super compact (104×60×17 mm)

common strengths of the T4i and Slice

  • Have touch screens

Nikon D3200

Nikon D3200
2 years newer
$269 (body only)
$349 - $447 18-55mm lens

Significant advantages of the D3200 (vs the Slice)

  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs 848 x 480 @ 30fps
  • Has a viewfinder: Pentamirror vs None
  • Much higher true resolution: 24.1 MP vs 9.7 MP

Significant disadvantages of the D3200 (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • Much thicker: 3" vs 0.7"
  • No image stabilization: None vs
    1. Lens

common strengths of the D3200 and Slice

  • Light weight: 505 g vs 158 g
  • Inexpensive: $269.00 vs $140.99