As well as being compared against other compacts, the Kodak Slice is also often compared to travel zooms, ultra compacts and entry-level DSLRs. The Kodak Slice's top rivals come from Canon (such as the ELPH 310 HS and the ELPH 320 HS) and Nikon (such as the Coolpix S80 and the D40X)

compared toCompact competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Kodak Slice compared to other compact competitors include: it has a significantly larger screen (3.5" vs 3.0"), has better image stabilization (lens vs digital), has a touch screen and is thinner (0.7" vs 0.8").

However, on average it has a much narrower aperture (f/4.8 vs f/2.8), records lower quality movies (848 x 480 @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 24fps), has a significantly narrower wide angle lens (35 mm vs 28 mm), doesn't record movies in 24p and doesn't have an OLED screen (LCD vs OLED).

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W370

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W370
similar age

Significant advantages of the DSC-W370 (vs the Slice)

  • Significantly wider aperture: f/3.6 vs f/4.8

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-W370 (vs the Slice)

  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen
  • Thicker: 1" vs 0.7"

common strengths of the DSC-W370 and Slice

  • None found
arrow Compare the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W370 vs the Kodak Slice

Nikon Coolpix S80

Nikon Coolpix S80
8 months newer
$210

Significant advantages of the S80 (vs the Slice)

  • Significantly wider aperture: f/3.6 vs f/4.8
  • Has an OLED screen: OLED vs LCD
  • Supports 24p

Significant disadvantages of the S80 (vs the Slice)

  • None found

common strengths of the S80 and Slice

  • Very large screens: 3.5" vs 3.5"
  • Fairly small: Super compact 99x63x17 mm vs Super compact 104x60x17 mm
  • Have touch screens
arrow Compare the Nikon Coolpix S80 vs the Kodak Slice

Canon ELPH 320 HS

Canon PowerShot ELPH 320 HS
2 years newer
$160 - $250

Significant advantages of the 320 HS (vs the Slice)

  • Much wider aperture: f/2.7 vs f/4.8
  • Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 35 mm
  • Supports 24p

Significant disadvantages of the 320 HS (vs the Slice)

  • None found

common strengths of the 320 HS and Slice

  • Larger than average screens: 3.2" vs 3.5"
  • Fairly small: Super compact 94x57x21 mm vs Super compact 104x60x17 mm
  • Have touch screens
arrow Compare the Canon PowerShot ELPH 320 HS vs the Kodak Slice

Fujifilm FinePix Z90

Fujifilm FinePix Z90
1 year newer
$167

Significant advantages of the Z90 (vs the Slice)

  • Significantly wider aperture: f/3.9 vs f/4.8
  • Significantly better wide angle: 28 mm vs 35 mm

Significant disadvantages of the Z90 (vs the Slice)

  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • Worse image stabilization: Digital vs Lens

common strengths of the Z90 and Slice

  • Fairly small: Super compact 95x56x20 mm vs Super compact 104x60x17 mm
  • Have touch screens
  • Thin: 0.8" vs 0.7"
arrow Compare the Fujifilm FinePix Z90 vs the Kodak Slice

Olympus VG-160

Olympus VG-160
2 years newer
$112

Significant advantages of the VG-160 (vs the Slice)

  • Much wider aperture: f/2.8 vs f/4.8
  • Much better wide angle: 26 mm vs 35 mm
  • Much better macro capability: 2 cm vs 10 cm

Significant disadvantages of the VG-160 (vs the Slice)

  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen
  • Worse image stabilization: Digital vs Lens

common strengths of the VG-160 and Slice

  • Fairly small: Super compact 96x57x19 mm vs Super compact 104x60x17 mm
  • Thin: 0.7" vs 0.7"
arrow Compare the Olympus VG-160 vs the Kodak Slice

Canon PowerShot A2200

Canon PowerShot A2200
1 year newer
$100

Significant advantages of the A2200 (vs the Slice)

  • Much wider aperture: f/2.8 vs f/4.8
  • Significantly better wide angle: 28 mm vs 35 mm
  • Much better macro capability: 3 cm vs 10 cm

Significant disadvantages of the A2200 (vs the Slice)

  • No image stabilization: None vs Lens
  • Much smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the A2200 and Slice

  • Fairly small: Super compact 93x55x22 mm vs Super compact 104x60x17 mm
  • Thin: 0.9" vs 0.7"
arrow Compare the Canon PowerShot A2200 vs the Kodak Slice

compared toTravel zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Kodak Slice compared to travel zoom competitors include: it has a significantly larger screen (3.5" vs 3.0"), is significantly smaller (super compact 104x60x17 mm vs compact 105x58x33 mm), has a touch screen, is thinner (0.7" vs 1.3") and is slightly lighter (158 g vs 206 g).

However, on average it has significantly less zoom (5x vs 20x), has a much narrower wide angle lens (35 mm vs 24 mm), has a much narrower aperture (f/4.8 vs f/3.0), doesn't have a built-in GPS and records lower quality movies (848 x 480 @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 60fps).

Canon ELPH 310 HS

Canon ELPH 310 HS
1 year newer
$330

Significant advantages of the 310 HS (vs the Slice)

  • Much wider aperture: f/3.0 vs f/4.8
  • Significantly better wide angle: 28 mm vs 35 mm
  • Much better macro capability: 1 cm vs 10 cm

Significant disadvantages of the 310 HS (vs the Slice)

  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the 310 HS and Slice

  • Very small: Super compact 96x57x22 mm vs Super compact 104x60x17 mm
  • Thin: 0.9" vs 0.7"
  • Light weight: 140 g vs 158 g
arrow Compare the Canon ELPH 310 HS vs the Kodak Slice

Panasonic Lumix ZS30

Panasonic Lumix ZS30
3 years newer
$319

Significant advantages of the ZS30 (vs the Slice)

  • Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 35 mm
  • Much wider aperture: f/3.3 vs f/4.8
  • Has a GPS

Significant disadvantages of the ZS30 (vs the Slice)

  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • Significantly larger: Compact 105x59x28 mm vs Super compact 104x60x17 mm
  • Significantly thicker: 1.1" vs 0.7"

common strengths of the ZS30 and Slice

  • Have touch screens
arrow Compare the Panasonic Lumix ZS30 vs the Kodak Slice

Panasonic Lumix ZS15

Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS15
2 years newer

Significant advantages of the ZS15 (vs the Slice)

  • Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 35 mm
  • Much wider aperture: f/3.3 vs f/4.8
  • Takes 3D photos

Significant disadvantages of the ZS15 (vs the Slice)

  • Significantly larger: Compact 105x58x33 mm vs Super compact 104x60x17 mm
  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the ZS15 and Slice

  • None found
arrow Compare the Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS15 vs the Kodak Slice

Panasonic Lumix ZS40

Panasonic Lumix ZS40
4 years newer
$419 - $448

Significant advantages of the ZS40 (vs the Slice)

  • Much more zoom: 30x vs 5x
  • Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 35 mm
  • Much wider aperture: f/3.3 vs f/4.8

Significant disadvantages of the ZS40 (vs the Slice)

  • Much larger: Compact 111x64x34 mm vs Super compact 104x60x17 mm
  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the ZS40 and Slice

  • None found
arrow Compare the Panasonic Lumix ZS40 vs the Kodak Slice

Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS10

Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS10
1 year newer
$300 - $335

Significant advantages of the DMC-ZS10 (vs the Slice)

  • Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 35 mm
  • Much wider aperture: f/3.3 vs f/4.8
  • Has a GPS

Significant disadvantages of the DMC-ZS10 (vs the Slice)

  • Significantly larger: Compact 105x58x33 mm vs Super compact 104x60x17 mm
  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • Much thicker: 1.3" vs 0.7"

common strengths of the DMC-ZS10 and Slice

  • Have touch screens
arrow Compare the Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS10 vs the Kodak Slice

Panasonic Lumix ZS20

Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS20
2 years newer
$290 - $399

Significant advantages of the ZS20 (vs the Slice)

  • Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 35 mm
  • Much wider aperture: f/3.3 vs f/4.8
  • Has a GPS

Significant disadvantages of the ZS20 (vs the Slice)

  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • Significantly larger: Compact 105x59x28 mm vs Super compact 104x60x17 mm
  • Significantly thicker: 1.1" vs 0.7"

common strengths of the ZS20 and Slice

  • Have touch screens
arrow Compare the Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS20 vs the Kodak Slice

compared toUltra compact competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Kodak Slice compared to ultra compact competitors include: it has a significantly larger screen (3.5" vs 2.7"), has better image stabilization (lens vs sensor shift) and has a touch screen.

However, on average it has a much narrower aperture (f/4.8 vs f/3.2), records lower quality movies (848 x 480 @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 60fps), has a much narrower wide angle lens (35 mm vs 24 mm), slightly lower maximum light sensitivity (3,200 ISO vs 6,400 ISO) and has a CCD-family sensor (CCD vs CMOS).

Samsung ST95

Samsung ST95
1 year newer

Significant advantages of the ST95 (vs the Slice)

  • Much wider aperture: f/3.3 vs f/4.8
  • Much better wide angle: 26 mm vs 35 mm
  • Much better macro capability: 5 cm vs 10 cm

Significant disadvantages of the ST95 (vs the Slice)

  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • Worse image stabilization: Digital vs Lens

common strengths of the ST95 and Slice

  • Each has a built-in flash
  • Larger than average screens: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • Have touch screens
arrow Compare the Samsung ST95 vs the Kodak Slice

Nikon Coolpix S3100

Nikon Coolpix S3100
1 year newer
$131

Significant advantages of the S3100 (vs the Slice)

  • Much wider aperture: f/3.2 vs f/4.8
  • Much better wide angle: 26 mm vs 35 mm
  • Can create panoramas in-camera

Significant disadvantages of the S3100 (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the S3100 and Slice

  • Each has a built-in flash
  • Good image stabilization: Sensor shift vs Lens
  • Thin: 0.7" vs 0.7"
arrow Compare the Nikon Coolpix S3100 vs the Kodak Slice

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX200V

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX200V
2 years newer
$340

Significant advantages of the DSC-TX200V (vs the Slice)

  • Much wider aperture: f/3.5 vs f/4.8
  • Much better wide angle: 26 mm vs 35 mm
  • Takes 3D photos

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-TX200V (vs the Slice)

  • None found

common strengths of the DSC-TX200V and Slice

  • Each has a built-in flash
  • Very large screens: 3.3" vs 3.5"
  • Very good image stabilization: Lens vs Lens
arrow Compare the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX200V vs the Kodak Slice

Panasonic Lumix DMC-XS1

Panasonic Lumix DMC-XS1
3 years newer
$131

Significant advantages of the DMC-XS1 (vs the Slice)

  • Much wider aperture: f/2.8 vs f/4.8
  • Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 35 mm
  • Can create panoramas in-camera

Significant disadvantages of the DMC-XS1 (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the DMC-XS1 and Slice

  • Each has a built-in flash
  • Very good image stabilization: Lens vs Lens
  • Very thin: 0.7" vs 0.7"
arrow Compare the Panasonic Lumix DMC-XS1 vs the Kodak Slice

compared toEntry-level DSLR competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Kodak Slice compared to entry-level DSLR competitors include: it has a much larger screen (3.5" vs 2.5"), has image stabilization (lens vs none), has a touch screen, is much smaller (super compact 104x60x17 mm vs professional size 133x100x79 mm) and is thinner (0.7" vs 3").

However, on average it records lower quality movies (848 x 480 @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps), takes much lower resolution photos (9.7 MP vs 17.9 MP), doesn't record movies in 24p, doesn't have a screen which flips out and has a much smaller sensor (1/2.3" 6.2x4.6mm vs APS-C 23.2x15.4mm).

Canon Rebel T5i

Canon Rebel T5i
3 years newer
$200 18-55mm lens

Significant advantages of the T5i (vs the Slice)

  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs 848 x 480 @ 30fps
  • Much larger sensor: APS-C 22.3x14.9mm vs 1/2.3" 6.2x4.6mm
  • Has a viewfinder: Pentamirror vs None

Significant disadvantages of the T5i (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • Much larger: Professional size 133x100x79 mm vs Super compact 104x60x17 mm
  • No image stabilization: None vs Lens

common strengths of the T5i and Slice

  • Have touch screens
arrow Compare the Canon Rebel T5i vs the Kodak Slice

Nikon D40X

Nikon D40X
2 years older

Significant advantages of the D40X (vs the Slice)

  • Much larger sensor: APS-C 23.7x15.6mm vs 1/2.3" 6.2x4.6mm
  • Has a viewfinder: Pentamirror vs None
  • Shoots RAW

Significant disadvantages of the D40X (vs the Slice)

  • Does not take movies: None vs 848 x 480 @ 30fps
  • Much smaller screen: 2.5" vs 3.5"
  • Much larger: Prosumer size 124x94x64 mm vs Super compact 104x60x17 mm

common strengths of the D40X and Slice

  • Very small: Prosumer size 124x94x64 mm vs Super compact 104x60x17 mm
  • Very thin: 2.5" vs 0.7"
  • Light weight: 522 g vs 158 g
arrow Compare the Nikon D40X vs the Kodak Slice

Nikon D3200

Nikon D3200
2 years newer
$319 (body only)
$477 18-55mm lens

Significant advantages of the D3200 (vs the Slice)

  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs 848 x 480 @ 30fps
  • Much larger sensor: APS-C 23.2x15.4mm vs 1/2.3" 6.2x4.6mm
  • Has a viewfinder: Pentamirror vs None

Significant disadvantages of the D3200 (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • Much larger: Prosumer size 125x96x76 mm vs Super compact 104x60x17 mm
  • No image stabilization: None vs Lens

common strengths of the D3200 and Slice

  • Light weight: 505 g vs 158 g
arrow Compare the Nikon D3200 vs the Kodak Slice

Canon Rebel T3i

Canon Rebel T3i
1 year newer
$499 - $648 (body only)
$200 - $570 18-55mm lens

Significant advantages of the T3i (vs the Slice)

  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs 848 x 480 @ 30fps
  • Much larger sensor: APS-C 22.3x14.9mm vs 1/2.3" 6.2x4.6mm
  • Has a viewfinder: Pentamirror vs None

Significant disadvantages of the T3i (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • Much larger: Professional size 133x99x79 mm vs Super compact 104x60x17 mm
  • No image stabilization: None vs Lens

common strengths of the T3i and Slice

  • None found
arrow Compare the Canon Rebel T3i vs the Kodak Slice