As well as being compared against other compacts, the Kodak Slice is also often compared to ultra compacts, entry-level DSLRs, travel zooms, super zooms and digicams. The Kodak Slice's top rivals come from Sony (such as the Cyber-shot DSC-TX1 and the Cyber-shot DSC-T300) and Nikon (such as the Coolpix S80 and the D3100)

compared toCompact competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Kodak Slice compared to other compact competitors include: it has a slightly larger screen (3.5" vs 3.0") and has a touch screen.

However, on average it has a much narrower aperture (f/4.8 vs f/2.8), records lower quality movies (848 x 480 @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 24fps), has a significantly narrower wide angle lens (35 mm vs 24 mm), doesn't record high-speed movies (none vs 240 fps) and doesn't record movies in 24p.

Fujifilm FinePix Z90

Fujifilm FinePix Z90
1 year newer
$97

Significant advantages of the Z90 (vs the Slice)

  • Significantly wider aperture: f/3.9 vs f/4.8
  • Significantly better wide angle: 28 mm vs 35 mm

Significant disadvantages of the Z90 (vs the Slice)

  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • Worse image stabilization: Digital vs Lens

common strengths of the Z90 and Slice

  • Fairly small: Super compact 95x56x20 mm vs Super compact 104x60x17 mm
  • Have touch screens
  • Thin: 0.8" vs 0.7"
arrow Compare the Fujifilm FinePix Z90 vs the Kodak Slice

Nikon Coolpix S80

Nikon Coolpix S80
8 months newer
$249

Significant advantages of the S80 (vs the Slice)

  • Significantly wider aperture: f/3.6 vs f/4.8
  • Has an OLED screen: OLED vs LCD
  • Supports 24p

Significant disadvantages of the S80 (vs the Slice)

  • None found

common strengths of the S80 and Slice

  • Very large screens: 3.5" vs 3.5"
  • Fairly small: Super compact 99x63x17 mm vs Super compact 104x60x17 mm
  • Good image stabilization: Lens vs Lens
arrow Compare the Nikon Coolpix S80 vs the Kodak Slice

Canon ELPH 100 HS

Canon ELPH 100 HS
1 year newer
$109 - $180

Significant advantages of the 100 HS (vs the Slice)

  • Much wider aperture: f/2.8 vs f/4.8
  • Significantly better wide angle: 28 mm vs 35 mm
  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 24fps vs 848 x 480 @ 30fps

Significant disadvantages of the 100 HS (vs the Slice)

  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the 100 HS and Slice

  • Fairly small: Super compact 93x55x19 mm vs Super compact 104x60x17 mm
  • Good image stabilization: Lens vs Lens
  • Thin: 0.8" vs 0.7"
arrow Compare the Canon ELPH 100 HS vs the Kodak Slice

Canon ELPH 300 HS

Canon ELPH 300 HS
1 year newer
$149 - $179

Significant advantages of the 300 HS (vs the Slice)

  • Much wider aperture: f/2.7 vs f/4.8
  • Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 35 mm
  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 24fps vs 848 x 480 @ 30fps

Significant disadvantages of the 300 HS (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the 300 HS and Slice

  • Fairly small: Super compact 92x55x19 mm vs Super compact 104x60x17 mm
  • Good image stabilization: Lens vs Lens
  • Thin: 0.8" vs 0.7"
arrow Compare the Canon ELPH 300 HS vs the Kodak Slice

Nikon Coolpix S70

Nikon Coolpix S70
5 months older

Significant advantages of the S70 (vs the Slice)

  • Significantly wider aperture: f/3.9 vs f/4.8
  • Has an OLED screen: OLED vs LCD
  • Significantly better wide angle: 28 mm vs 35 mm

Significant disadvantages of the S70 (vs the Slice)

  • None found

common strengths of the S70 and Slice

  • Very large screens: 3.5" vs 3.5"
  • Fairly small: Super compact 97x61x20 mm vs Super compact 104x60x17 mm
  • Good image stabilization: Lens vs Lens
arrow Compare the Nikon Coolpix S70 vs the Kodak Slice

Canon PowerShot ELPH 110 HS

Canon PowerShot ELPH 110 HS
2 years newer
$199

Significant advantages of the ELPH 110 HS (vs the Slice)

  • Much wider aperture: f/2.7 vs f/4.8
  • Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 35 mm
  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 24fps vs 848 x 480 @ 30fps

Significant disadvantages of the ELPH 110 HS (vs the Slice)

  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the ELPH 110 HS and Slice

  • Fairly small: Super compact 93x57x20 mm vs Super compact 104x60x17 mm
  • Good image stabilization: Lens vs Lens
  • Thin: 0.8" vs 0.7"
arrow Compare the Canon PowerShot ELPH 110 HS vs the Kodak Slice

compared toUltra compact competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Kodak Slice compared to ultra compact competitors include: it has a significantly larger screen (3.5" vs 3.0") and has a touch screen.

However, on average it has a much narrower aperture (f/4.8 vs f/2.6), records lower quality movies (848 x 480 @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 24fps), has a significantly narrower wide angle lens (35 mm vs 28 mm), doesn't record movies in 24p and doesn't shoot as fast continuously (3 fps vs 10 fps).

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX1

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX1
5 months older
$494

Significant advantages of the DSC-TX1 (vs the Slice)

  • Much wider aperture: f/3.5 vs f/4.8
  • Much better macro capability: 1 cm vs 10 cm
  • Has a CMOS-family sensor: CMOS vs CCD

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-TX1 (vs the Slice)

  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"

common strengths of the DSC-TX1 and Slice

  • Each has a built-in flash
  • Larger than average screens: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • Very good image stabilization: Lens vs Lens
arrow Compare the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX1 vs the Kodak Slice

Kodak EasyShare M590

Kodak EasyShare M590
7 months newer

Significant advantages of the M590 (vs the Slice)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the M590 (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the M590 and Slice

  • Each has a built-in flash
  • Very good image stabilization: Lens vs Lens
  • Very thin: 0.6" vs 0.7"
arrow Compare the EasyShare M590 vs the Slice

Sony Cybershot DSC-WX30

Sony Cybershot DSC-WX30
1 year newer

Significant advantages of the DSC-WX30 (vs the Slice)

  • Much wider aperture: f/2.6 vs f/4.8
  • Much better wide angle: 25 mm vs 35 mm
  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs 848 x 480 @ 30fps

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-WX30 (vs the Slice)

  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"

common strengths of the DSC-WX30 and Slice

  • Each has a built-in flash
  • Larger than average screens: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • Very good image stabilization: Lens vs Lens
arrow Compare the Sony Cybershot DSC-WX30 vs the Kodak Slice

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX200V

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX200V
2 years newer
$298

Significant advantages of the DSC-TX200V (vs the Slice)

  • Much wider aperture: f/3.5 vs f/4.8
  • Much better wide angle: 26 mm vs 35 mm
  • Has an OLED screen: OLED vs LCD

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-TX200V (vs the Slice)

  • None found

common strengths of the DSC-TX200V and Slice

  • Each has a built-in flash
  • Very large screens: 3.3" vs 3.5"
  • Very good image stabilization: Lens vs Lens
arrow Compare the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX200V vs the Kodak Slice

Canon PowerShot ELPH 520 HS

Canon ELPH 520 HS
2 years newer
$159 - $175

Significant advantages of the ELPH 520 HS (vs the Slice)

  • Much wider aperture: f/3.4 vs f/4.8
  • Significantly better wide angle: 28 mm vs 35 mm
  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 24fps vs 848 x 480 @ 30fps

Significant disadvantages of the ELPH 520 HS (vs the Slice)

  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the ELPH 520 HS and Slice

  • Each has a built-in flash
  • Larger than average screens: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • Very good image stabilization: Lens vs Lens
arrow Compare the Canon ELPH 520 HS vs the Kodak Slice

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX30

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX30
3 years newer
$198 - $214

Significant advantages of the DSC-TX30 (vs the Slice)

  • Much wider aperture: f/3.5 vs f/4.8
  • Much better wide angle: 26 mm vs 35 mm
  • Has an OLED screen: OLED vs LCD

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-TX30 (vs the Slice)

  • None found

common strengths of the DSC-TX30 and Slice

  • Each has a built-in flash
  • Very large screens: 3.3" vs 3.5"
  • Very good image stabilization: Lens vs Lens
arrow Compare the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX30 vs the Kodak Slice

compared toEntry-level DSLR competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Kodak Slice compared to entry-level DSLR competitors include: it has a much larger screen (3.5" vs 3.0"), has image stabilization (lens vs none), has a touch screen, is much smaller (super compact 104x60x17 mm vs professional size 133x100x79 mm) and is thinner (0.7" vs 3.1").

However, on average it records lower quality movies (848 x 480 @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps), takes significantly lower resolution photos (9.7 MP vs 17.9 MP), doesn't record movies in 24p, doesn't have a screen which flips out and has a much smaller sensor (1/2.3" 6.2x4.6mm vs APS-C 23.1x15.4mm).

Nikon D3100

Nikon D3100
7 months newer
$278 (body only)
$380 - $427 18-55mm lens

Significant advantages of the D3100 (vs the Slice)

  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 24fps vs 848 x 480 @ 30fps
  • Much larger sensor: APS-C 23.1x15.4mm vs 1/2.3" 6.2x4.6mm
  • Has a viewfinder: Pentamirror vs None

Significant disadvantages of the D3100 (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • Much larger: Prosumer size 124x96x73 mm vs Super compact 104x60x17 mm
  • No image stabilization: None vs Lens

common strengths of the D3100 and Slice

  • Fairly small: Prosumer size 124x96x73 mm vs Super compact 104x60x17 mm
  • Thin: 2.9" vs 0.7"
  • Light weight: 505 g vs 158 g
arrow Compare the Nikon D3100 vs the Kodak Slice

Canon Rebel T3i

Canon Rebel T3i
1 year newer
$499 - $774 (body only)
$200 - $729 18-55mm lens

Significant advantages of the T3i (vs the Slice)

  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs 848 x 480 @ 30fps
  • Much larger sensor: APS-C 22.3x14.9mm vs 1/2.3" 6.2x4.6mm
  • Has a viewfinder: Pentamirror vs None

Significant disadvantages of the T3i (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • Much larger: Professional size 133x99x79 mm vs Super compact 104x60x17 mm
  • No image stabilization: None vs Lens

common strengths of the T3i and Slice

  • Very inexpensive: $199.95 vs $199.99
arrow Compare the Canon Rebel T3i vs the Kodak Slice

Canon Rebel T5i

Canon Rebel T5i
3 years newer
$200 - $1,148 18-55mm lens

Significant advantages of the T5i (vs the Slice)

  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs 848 x 480 @ 30fps
  • Much larger sensor: APS-C 22.3x14.9mm vs 1/2.3" 6.2x4.6mm
  • Has a viewfinder: Pentamirror vs None

Significant disadvantages of the T5i (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • Much larger: Professional size 133x100x79 mm vs Super compact 104x60x17 mm
  • No image stabilization: None vs Lens

common strengths of the T5i and Slice

  • Have touch screens
  • Very inexpensive: $199.95 vs $199.99
arrow Compare the Canon Rebel T5i vs the Kodak Slice

compared toTravel zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Kodak Slice compared to travel zoom competitors include: it has a much larger screen (3.5" vs 2.7") and has a touch screen.

However, on average it has a much narrower wide angle lens (35 mm vs 24 mm), has a much narrower aperture (f/4.8 vs f/3.1), doesn't have a built-in GPS, records lower quality movies (848 x 480 @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps) and doesn't record high-speed movies (none vs 220 fps).

Canon IXUS 132

Canon IXUS 132
3 years newer
$110

Significant advantages of the IXUS 132 (vs the Slice)

  • Much wider aperture: f/3.2 vs f/4.8
  • Much better wide angle: 28 mm vs 35 mm
  • Faster autofocus: Phase detection vs Contrast detection

Significant disadvantages of the IXUS 132 (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the IXUS 132 and Slice

  • None found
arrow Compare the Canon IXUS 132 vs the Kodak Slice

Canon ELPH 310 HS

Canon ELPH 310 HS
1 year newer
$199

Significant advantages of the 310 HS (vs the Slice)

  • Much wider aperture: f/3.0 vs f/4.8
  • Much better wide angle: 28 mm vs 35 mm
  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs 848 x 480 @ 30fps

Significant disadvantages of the 310 HS (vs the Slice)

  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the 310 HS and Slice

  • None found
arrow Compare the Canon ELPH 310 HS vs the Kodak Slice

Panasonic Lumix ZS30

Panasonic Lumix ZS30
3 years newer
$500

Significant advantages of the ZS30 (vs the Slice)

  • Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 35 mm
  • Has a GPS
  • Much wider aperture: f/3.3 vs f/4.8

Significant disadvantages of the ZS30 (vs the Slice)

  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"

common strengths of the ZS30 and Slice

  • Have touch screens
arrow Compare the Panasonic Lumix ZS30 vs the Kodak Slice

Olympus SZ10

Olympus SZ-10
1 year newer
$276

Significant advantages of the SZ10 (vs the Slice)

  • Much wider aperture: f/3.1 vs f/4.8
  • Much better wide angle: 28 mm vs 35 mm
  • Takes 3D photos

Significant disadvantages of the SZ10 (vs the Slice)

  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the SZ10 and Slice

  • None found
arrow Compare the Olympus SZ-10 vs the Kodak Slice

Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS10

Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS10
1 year newer
$235 - $300

Significant advantages of the DMC-ZS10 (vs the Slice)

  • Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 35 mm
  • Has a GPS
  • Much wider aperture: f/3.3 vs f/4.8

Significant disadvantages of the DMC-ZS10 (vs the Slice)

  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"

common strengths of the DMC-ZS10 and Slice

  • Have touch screens
arrow Compare the Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS10 vs the Kodak Slice

Samsung HZ30W

Samsung HZ30W
similar age

Significant advantages of the HZ30W (vs the Slice)

  • Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 35 mm
  • Much wider aperture: f/3.2 vs f/4.8
  • Much better macro capability: 3 cm vs 10 cm

Significant disadvantages of the HZ30W (vs the Slice)

  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the HZ30W and Slice

  • None found
arrow Compare the Samsung HZ30W vs the Kodak Slice

compared toSuper zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Kodak Slice compared to super zoom competitors include: it has a significantly larger screen (3.5" vs 3.0"), is significantly smaller (super compact 104x60x17 mm vs professional size 124x86x93 mm), has a touch screen, is thinner (0.7" vs 3.7") and is significantly lighter (158 g vs 589 g).

However, on average it has a much narrower aperture (f/4.8 vs f/2.8), has significantly less zoom (5x vs 34.8x), records lower quality movies (848 x 480 @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps), has a much narrower wide angle lens (35 mm vs 24 mm) and doesn't record high-speed movies (none vs 240 fps).

Kodak Easyshare Z990 MAX

Kodak Easyshare Z990 MAX
1 year newer

Significant advantages of the Z990 MAX (vs the Slice)

  • Much wider aperture: f/2.8 vs f/4.8
  • Much better wide angle: 28 mm vs 35 mm
  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs 848 x 480 @ 30fps

Significant disadvantages of the Z990 MAX (vs the Slice)

  • Much larger: Professional size 124x86x93 mm vs Super compact 104x60x17 mm
  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the Z990 MAX and Slice

  • None found
arrow Compare the Easyshare Z990 MAX vs the Slice

Nikon Coolpix L830

Nikon Coolpix L830
4 years newer
$227

Significant advantages of the L830 (vs the Slice)

  • Much wider aperture: f/3.0 vs f/4.8
  • Much better wide angle: 22 mm vs 35 mm
  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs 848 x 480 @ 30fps

Significant disadvantages of the L830 (vs the Slice)

  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • Significantly larger: Prosumer size 111x75x91 mm vs Super compact 104x60x17 mm
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the L830 and Slice

  • Fairly small: Prosumer size 111x75x91 mm vs Super compact 104x60x17 mm
arrow Compare the Nikon Coolpix L830 vs the Kodak Slice

Nikon Coolpix P530

Nikon Coolpix P530
4 years newer
$347

Significant advantages of the P530 (vs the Slice)

  • Much wider aperture: f/3.0 vs f/4.8
  • Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 35 mm
  • Significantly more zoom: 41.7x vs 5x

Significant disadvantages of the P530 (vs the Slice)

  • Much larger: Professional size 122x84x98 mm vs Super compact 104x60x17 mm
  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the P530 and Slice

  • None found
arrow Compare the Nikon Coolpix P530 vs the Kodak Slice

Nikon Coolpix L820

Nikon Coolpix L820
3 years newer
$160 - $279

Significant advantages of the L820 (vs the Slice)

  • Much wider aperture: f/3.0 vs f/4.8
  • Much better wide angle: 23 mm vs 35 mm
  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs 848 x 480 @ 30fps

Significant disadvantages of the L820 (vs the Slice)

  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen
  • Significantly larger: Prosumer size 111x76x85 mm vs Super compact 104x60x17 mm

common strengths of the L820 and Slice

  • Fairly small: Prosumer size 111x76x85 mm vs Super compact 104x60x17 mm
  • Inexpensive: $159.95 vs $199.99
arrow Compare the Nikon Coolpix L820 vs the Kodak Slice

compared toDigicam competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Kodak Slice compared to digicam competitors include: it has a significantly larger screen (3.5" vs 3.0") and has a touch screen.

However, on average it has a much narrower aperture (f/4.8 vs f/3.0), records lower quality movies (848 x 480 @ 30fps vs 720p @ 30fps), has a much narrower wide angle lens (35 mm vs 25 mm), doesn't shoot as fast continuously (3 fps vs 10 fps) and lacks a built in panoramas.

Olympus SZ-14

Olympus SZ-14
2 years newer
$149

Significant advantages of the SZ-14 (vs the Slice)

  • Much wider aperture: f/3.0 vs f/4.8
  • Much better wide angle: 25 mm vs 35 mm
  • Takes 3D photos

Significant disadvantages of the SZ-14 (vs the Slice)

  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"

common strengths of the SZ-14 and Slice

  • None found
arrow Compare the Olympus SZ-14 vs the Kodak Slice

Olympus SZ-11

Olympus SZ-11
1 year newer

Significant advantages of the SZ-11 (vs the Slice)

  • Much wider aperture: f/3.0 vs f/4.8
  • Much better wide angle: 28 mm vs 35 mm
  • Takes 3D photos

Significant disadvantages of the SZ-11 (vs the Slice)

  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the SZ-11 and Slice

  • None found
arrow Compare the Olympus SZ-11 vs the Kodak Slice