As well as being compared against other compacts, the Kodak Slice is also often compared to travel zooms, super zooms, entry-level DSLRs and ultra compacts. The Kodak Slice's top rivals come from Canon (such as the Rebel T5i and the EOS Rebel T6s) and Panasonic (such as the Lumix ZS25 and the Lumix ZS30)
Generally, some of the advantages of the Kodak Slice compared to other compact competitors include: it has a much larger screen (3.5" vs 3"), is slightly smaller (super compact (104×60×17 mm) vs compact (100×59×29 mm)), has a touch screen, is thinner (0.7" vs 1.1") and is slightly less expensive ($140.99 vs $349.00).
However, on average it has a much narrower aperture (f/4.8 vs f/1.8), records lower quality movies (848 x 480 @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 24fps), has a much narrower wide angle lens (35 mm vs 24 mm), doesn't record high-speed movies (none vs 240 fps) and has a CCD-family sensor (CCD vs CMOS).
Generally, some of the advantages of the Kodak Slice compared to travel zoom competitors include: it has a much larger screen (3.5" vs 3"), is significantly smaller (super compact (104×60×17 mm) vs compact (105×58×33 mm)), has a touch screen, is thinner (0.7" vs 1.3") and is slightly lighter (158 g vs 208 g).
However, on average it has significantly less zoom (5x vs 20x), has a much narrower wide angle lens (35 mm vs 24 mm), has a much narrower aperture (f/4.8 vs f/3.3), doesn't have a built-in GPS and records lower quality movies (848 x 480 @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 60fps).
Generally, some of the advantages of the Kodak Slice compared to super zoom competitors include: it has a much larger screen (3.5" vs 3"), is significantly smaller (super compact (104×60×17 mm) vs prosumer size (114×89×96 mm)), has a touch screen, is thinner (0.7" vs 3.8") and is significantly lighter (158 g vs 538 g).
However, on average it has a much narrower aperture (f/4.8 vs f/3), has much less zoom (5x vs 41.7x), has a much narrower wide angle lens (35 mm vs 23 mm), doesn't record high-speed movies (none vs 120 fps) and doesn't have a screen which flips out.
Generally, some of the advantages of the Kodak Slice compared to entry-level DSLR competitors include: it has a much larger screen (3.5" vs 3"), has image stabilization (lens vs none), is much smaller (super compact (104×60×17 mm) vs professional size (132×111×78 mm)), is much less expensive ($140.99 vs $1,099.00) and is thinner (0.7" vs 3.1").
However, on average it records lower quality movies (848 x 480 @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps), takes much lower resolution photos (9.7 MP vs 24 MP), slightly lower maximum light sensitivity (3,200 ISO vs 25,600 ISO), doesn't record movies in 24p and doesn't shoot as fast continuously (3 fps vs 5 fps).
Generally, some of the advantages of the Kodak Slice compared to ultra compact competitors include: it has a much larger screen (3.5" vs 2.7"), has a touch screen and has a faster max shutter speed (1/2000 of a second vs 1/1600 of a second).
However, on average it has a much narrower aperture (f/4.8 vs f/2.8), records lower quality movies (848 x 480 @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps), has a much narrower wide angle lens (35 mm vs 25 mm), doesn't shoot as fast continuously (3 fps vs 10 fps) and has a CCD-family sensor (CCD vs CMOS).
