As well as being compared against other compacts, the Kodak Slice is also often compared to entry-level DSLRs. The Kodak Slice's top rivals come from Nikon (such as the Coolpix S80 and the D3200) and Fujifilm (such as the FinePix Z90)
Generally, some of the advantages of the Kodak Slice compared to other compact competitors include: it has a slightly larger screen (3.5" vs 3"), has better image stabilization (lens vs none), has a touch screen, is thinner (0.7" vs 0.8") and has a faster max shutter speed (1/2000 of a second vs 1/1500 of a second).
However, on average it has a significantly narrower aperture (f/4.8 vs f/2.8), has a much narrower wide angle lens (35 mm vs 28 mm), doesn't have an OLED screen (LCD vs OLED) and is older (january 2010 vs september 2010).
Generally, some of the advantages of the Kodak Slice compared to entry-level DSLR competitors include: it has a much larger screen (3.5" vs 3"), has image stabilization (lens vs none), has a touch screen, is much smaller (super compact (104×60×17 mm) vs prosumer size (125×96×77 mm)) and is thinner (0.7" vs 3").
However, on average it records lower quality movies (848 x 480 @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps), takes much lower resolution photos (9.7 MP vs 24.1 MP), doesn't record movies in 24p, doesn't shoot as fast continuously (3 fps vs 4 fps) and has a much smaller sensor (1/2.3" 6.18x4.55mm vs APS-C 23.2x15.4mm).
