As well as being compared against other compacts, the Kodak Slice is also often compared to ultra compacts, travel zooms, entry-level DSLRs and super zooms. The Kodak Slice's top rivals come from Canon (such as the ELPH 100 HS and the ELPH 300 HS) and Sony (such as the Cyber-shot DSC-TX1 and the Cyber-shot DSC-TX100v)
Generally, some of the advantages of the Kodak Slice compared to other compact competitors include: it has a slightly larger screen (3.5" vs 3.0") and has a touch screen.
However, on average it has a much narrower aperture (f/4.8 vs f/2.8), records lower quality movies (848 x 480 @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 24fps), has a significantly narrower wide angle lens (35 mm vs 27 mm), doesn't record high-speed movies (none vs 240 fps) and doesn't record movies in 24p.
Generally, some of the advantages of the Kodak Slice compared to ultra compact competitors include: it has a much larger screen (3.5" vs 2.7"), has a touch screen and has a faster max shutter speed (1/2000 of a second vs 1/1250 of a second).
However, on average it has a much narrower aperture (f/4.8 vs f/2.8), records lower quality movies (848 x 480 @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 24fps), has a slightly narrower wide angle lens (35 mm vs 28 mm), doesn't record movies in 24p and has a CCD-family sensor (CCD vs CMOS).
Generally, some of the advantages of the Kodak Slice compared to travel zoom competitors include: it has a significantly larger screen (3.5" vs 2.7"), is significantly smaller (super compact 104x60x17 mm vs compact 106x63x33 mm), has a touch screen, is thinner (0.7" vs 1.3") and is slightly lighter (158 g vs 206 g).
However, on average it has much less zoom (5x vs 20x), has a much narrower wide angle lens (35 mm vs 25 mm), has a much narrower aperture (f/4.8 vs f/3.3), doesn't have a built-in GPS and records lower quality movies (848 x 480 @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps).
Generally, some of the advantages of the Kodak Slice compared to entry-level DSLR competitors include: it has a much larger screen (3.5" vs 3.0"), has image stabilization (lens vs none), has a touch screen, is much smaller (super compact 104x60x17 mm vs professional size 133x99x79 mm) and is much less expensive ($104.99 vs $589.89).
However, on average it records lower quality movies (848 x 480 @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps), takes much lower resolution photos (9.7 MP vs 17.9 MP), doesn't record movies in 24p, doesn't shoot as fast continuously (3 fps vs 5 fps) and doesn't have a screen which flips out.
Generally, some of the advantages of the Kodak Slice compared to super zoom competitors include: it has a significantly larger screen (3.5" vs 3.0"), is significantly smaller (super compact 104x60x17 mm vs professional size 124x86x93 mm), has a touch screen, is thinner (0.7" vs 3.7") and is significantly lighter (158 g vs 589 g).
However, on average it has a much narrower aperture (f/4.8 vs f/2.8), has slightly less zoom (5x vs 30x), records lower quality movies (848 x 480 @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps), has a much narrower wide angle lens (35 mm vs 23 mm) and doesn't record high-speed movies (none vs 240 fps).
