As well as being compared against other compacts, the Kodak Slice is also often compared to travel zooms, ultra compacts and entry-level DSLRs. The Kodak Slice's top rivals come from Canon (such as the PowerShot IXUS 145 and the PowerShot ELPH 140 IS) and Nikon (such as the Coolpix P340 and the Coolpix P310)

compared toCompact competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Kodak Slice compared to other compact competitors include: it has a much larger screen (3.5" vs 3"), is slightly smaller (super compact (104×60×17 mm) vs compact (104×67×26 mm)), has better image stabilization (lens vs sensor shift), has a touch screen and is thinner (0.7" vs 1").

However, on average it has a much narrower aperture (f/4.8 vs f/2.8), records lower quality movies (848 x 480 @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 24fps), has a much narrower wide angle lens (35 mm vs 24 mm), doesn't record high-speed movies (none vs 240 fps) and doesn't record movies in 24p.

Nikon Coolpix P340

Nikon Coolpix P340
4 years newer
$350

Significant advantages of the P340 (vs the Slice)

  • Much wider aperture: f/1.8 vs f/4.8
  • Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 35 mm
  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs 848 x 480 @ 30fps

Significant disadvantages of the P340 (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • Significantly larger: Compact (103×58×32 mm) vs Super compact (104×60×17 mm)
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the P340 and Slice

  • Good image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs
    1. Lens

Nikon Coolpix P310

Nikon Coolpix P310
2 years newer
$369

Significant advantages of the P310 (vs the Slice)

  • Much wider aperture: f/1.8 vs f/4.8
  • Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 35 mm
  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs 848 x 480 @ 30fps

Significant disadvantages of the P310 (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • Significantly larger: Compact (103×58×32 mm) vs Super compact (104×60×17 mm)
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the P310 and Slice

  • Good image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs
    1. Lens

Canon PowerShot ELPH 110 HS

Canon PowerShot ELPH 110 HS
2 years newer
$250

Significant advantages of the ELPH 110 HS (vs the Slice)

  • Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 35 mm
  • Much wider aperture: f/2.7 vs f/4.8
  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 24fps vs 848 x 480 @ 30fps

Significant disadvantages of the ELPH 110 HS (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the ELPH 110 HS and Slice

  • Very small: Super compact (93×57×20 mm) vs Super compact (104×60×17 mm)
  • Good image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs
    1. Lens
  • Thin: 0.8" vs 0.7"

Fujifilm FinePix Z90

Fujifilm FinePix Z90
1 year newer
$170

Significant advantages of the Z90 (vs the Slice)

  • Much better wide angle: 28 mm vs 35 mm
  • Significantly wider aperture: f/3.9 vs f/4.8

Significant disadvantages of the Z90 (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • Worse image stabilization:
    1. Digital
    vs
    1. Lens

common strengths of the Z90 and Slice

  • Very small: Super compact (95×57×20 mm) vs Super compact (104×60×17 mm)
  • Have touch screens
  • Thin: 0.8" vs 0.7"

Canon PowerShot SD3500 IS

Canon PowerShot SD3500 IS
similar age
$320

Significant advantages of the SD3500 IS (vs the Slice)

  • Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 35 mm
  • Much wider aperture: f/2.8 vs f/4.8
  • Much better macro capability: 3.0 cm vs 10.0 cm

Significant disadvantages of the SD3500 IS (vs the Slice)

  • None found

common strengths of the SD3500 IS and Slice

  • Very large screens: 3.5" vs 3.5"
  • Fairly small: Super compact (99×56×22 mm) vs Super compact (104×60×17 mm)
  • Good image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs
    1. Lens

Fujifilm FinePix XP70

Fujifilm FinePix XP70
4 years newer
$139

Significant advantages of the XP70 (vs the Slice)

  • Much better wide angle: 28 mm vs 35 mm
  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs 848 x 480 @ 30fps
  • Significantly wider aperture: f/3.9 vs f/4.8

Significant disadvantages of the XP70 (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen
  • Significantly larger: Compact (104×67×26 mm) vs Super compact (104×60×17 mm)

common strengths of the XP70 and Slice

  • None found

compared toTravel zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Kodak Slice compared to travel zoom competitors include: it has a much larger screen (3.5" vs 2.7"), is significantly smaller (super compact (104×60×17 mm) vs compact (105×59×28 mm)), has a touch screen and is thinner (0.7" vs 1.3").

However, on average it has slightly less zoom (5x vs 20x), has a much narrower wide angle lens (35 mm vs 25 mm), has a much narrower aperture (f/4.8 vs f/3.3), doesn't have a built-in GPS and records lower quality movies (848 x 480 @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 60fps).

Canon PowerShot IXUS 145

Canon PowerShot IXUS 145
4 years newer
$320

Significant advantages of the IXUS 145 (vs the Slice)

  • Much better wide angle: 28 mm vs 35 mm
  • Much wider aperture: f/3.2 vs f/4.8
  • Much better macro capability: 1.0 cm vs 10.0 cm

Significant disadvantages of the IXUS 145 (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen
  • Worse image stabilization:
    1. Digital
    vs
    1. Lens

common strengths of the IXUS 145 and Slice

  • Very small: Super compact (95×54×22 mm) vs Super compact (104×60×17 mm)
  • Very thin: 0.9" vs 0.7"
  • Light weight: 127 g vs 158 g

Canon PowerShot ELPH 140 IS

Canon PowerShot ELPH 140 IS
4 years newer

Significant advantages of the ELPH 140 IS (vs the Slice)

  • Much better wide angle: 28 mm vs 35 mm
  • Much wider aperture: f/3.2 vs f/4.8
  • Much better macro capability: 1.0 cm vs 10.0 cm

Significant disadvantages of the ELPH 140 IS (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the ELPH 140 IS and Slice

  • Very small: Super compact (95×54×22 mm) vs Super compact (104×60×17 mm)
  • Very thin: 0.9" vs 0.7"
  • Light weight: 130 g vs 158 g

Kodak EasyShare Z915

Kodak EasyShare Z915
1 year older
$320

Significant advantages of the Z915 (vs the Slice)

  • Significantly wider aperture: f/3.5 vs f/4.8

Significant disadvantages of the Z915 (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 2.5" vs 3.5"
  • Much larger: Compact (90×64×39 mm) vs Super compact (104×60×17 mm)
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the Z915 and Slice

  • None found

Canon PowerShot SX270 HS

Canon PowerShot SX270 HS
3 years newer
$195

Significant advantages of the SX270 HS (vs the Slice)

  • Much better wide angle: 25 mm vs 35 mm
  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 60fps vs 848 x 480 @ 30fps
  • Records high-speed movies: 240 fps vs None

Significant disadvantages of the SX270 HS (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • Much larger: Compact (106×63×33 mm) vs Super compact (104×60×17 mm)
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the SX270 HS and Slice

  • None found

Panasonic Lumix ZS25

Panasonic Lumix ZS25
3 years newer
$306

Significant advantages of the ZS25 (vs the Slice)

  • Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 35 mm
  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 60fps vs 848 x 480 @ 30fps
  • Much wider aperture: f/3.3 vs f/4.8

Significant disadvantages of the ZS25 (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen
  • Significantly larger: Compact (105×59×28 mm) vs Super compact (104×60×17 mm)

common strengths of the ZS25 and Slice

  • Fairly small: Compact (105×59×28 mm) vs Super compact (104×60×17 mm)
  • Thin: 1.1" vs 0.7"

Panasonic Lumix ZS30

Panasonic Lumix ZS30
3 years newer
$220

Significant advantages of the ZS30 (vs the Slice)

  • Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 35 mm
  • Has a GPS
  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 60fps vs 848 x 480 @ 30fps

Significant disadvantages of the ZS30 (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • Significantly larger: Compact (105×59×28 mm) vs Super compact (104×60×17 mm)
  • Significantly thicker: 1.1" vs 0.7"

common strengths of the ZS30 and Slice

  • Fairly small: Compact (105×59×28 mm) vs Super compact (104×60×17 mm)
  • Have touch screens
  • Thin: 1.1" vs 0.7"

compared toUltra compact competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Kodak Slice compared to ultra compact competitors include: it has a much larger screen (3.5" vs 3"), has a touch screen and has a faster max shutter speed (1/2000 of a second vs 1/1200 of a second).

However, on average it has a significantly narrower aperture (f/4.8 vs f/3.5), records lower quality movies (848 x 480 @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 60fps), has a much narrower wide angle lens (35 mm vs 26 mm), doesn't shoot as fast continuously (3 fps vs 10 fps) and has a CCD-family sensor (CCD vs CMOS).

Kodak EasyShare M590

Kodak EasyShare M590
7 months newer
$119

Significant advantages of the M590 (vs the Slice)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the M590 (vs the Slice)

  • None found

common strengths of the M590 and Slice

  • Built-in flashes
  • Very good image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs
    1. Lens
  • Very thin: 0.6" vs 0.7"

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX30

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX30
3 years newer
$228 - $258

Significant advantages of the DSC-TX30 (vs the Slice)

  • Much better wide angle: 26 mm vs 35 mm
  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 60fps vs 848 x 480 @ 30fps
  • Significantly wider aperture: f/3.5 vs f/4.8

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-TX30 (vs the Slice)

  • None found

common strengths of the DSC-TX30 and Slice

  • Built-in flashes
  • Very good image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs
    1. Lens
  • Very thin: 0.6" vs 0.7"

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX20

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX20
2 years newer
$230

Significant advantages of the DSC-TX20 (vs the Slice)

  • Much better wide angle: 25 mm vs 35 mm
  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 60fps vs 848 x 480 @ 30fps
  • Significantly wider aperture: f/3.5 vs f/4.8

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-TX20 (vs the Slice)

  • None found

common strengths of the DSC-TX20 and Slice

  • Built-in flashes
  • Very good image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs
    1. Lens
  • Very thin: 0.7" vs 0.7"

compared toEntry-level DSLR competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Kodak Slice compared to entry-level DSLR competitors include: it has a much larger screen (3.5" vs 3"), has image stabilization (lens vs none), has a touch screen, is much smaller (super compact (104×60×17 mm) vs professional size (133×100×79 mm)) and is significantly less expensive ($249.99 vs $1,299.00).

However, on average it records lower quality movies (848 x 480 @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 60fps), takes much lower resolution photos (9.7 MP vs 24 MP), doesn't record movies in 24p, doesn't shoot as fast continuously (3 fps vs 5 fps) and doesn't have a screen which flips out.

Canon Kiss X5

Canon Kiss X5
1 year newer
$1,299 (body only)

Significant advantages of the X5 (vs the Slice)

  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs 848 x 480 @ 30fps
  • Has a viewfinder: Pentamirror vs None
  • Supports 24p

Significant disadvantages of the X5 (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • Much larger: Professional size (133×100×80 mm) vs Super compact (104×60×17 mm)
  • No image stabilization: None vs
    1. Lens

common strengths of the X5 and Slice

  • None found

Nikon D3300

Nikon D3300
4 years newer
$430 - $497 18-55mm lens

Significant advantages of the D3300 (vs the Slice)

  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 60fps vs 848 x 480 @ 30fps
  • Has a viewfinder: Pentamirror vs None
  • Supports 24p

Significant disadvantages of the D3300 (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • No image stabilization: None vs
    1. Lens
  • Much larger: Prosumer size (124×98×76 mm) vs Super compact (104×60×17 mm)

common strengths of the D3300 and Slice

  • Light weight: 430 g vs 158 g
  • Inexpensive: $329.99 vs $249.99

Nikon D5300

Nikon D5300
3 years newer
$480 - $647 (body only)
$549 - $747 18-55mm lens

Significant advantages of the D5300 (vs the Slice)

  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 60fps vs 848 x 480 @ 30fps
  • Has a viewfinder: Pentamirror vs None
  • Supports 24p

Significant disadvantages of the D5300 (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 3.2" vs 3.5"
  • No image stabilization: None vs
    1. Lens
  • Much larger: Prosumer size (124×99×76 mm) vs Super compact (104×60×17 mm)

common strengths of the D5300 and Slice

  • Larger than average screens: 3.2" vs 3.5"
  • Light weight: 480 g vs 158 g

Canon Rebel T5i

Canon Rebel T5i
3 years newer
$490 - $649 (body only)
$581 - $699 18-55mm lens

Significant advantages of the T5i (vs the Slice)

  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs 848 x 480 @ 30fps
  • Has a viewfinder: Pentamirror vs None
  • Supports 24p

Significant disadvantages of the T5i (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • Much larger: Professional size (133×100×79 mm) vs Super compact (104×60×17 mm)
  • No image stabilization: None vs
    1. Lens

common strengths of the T5i and Slice

  • Have touch screens

Canon Rebel T4i

Canon Rebel T4i
2 years newer
$670 (body only)
$615 18-55mm lens

Significant advantages of the T4i (vs the Slice)

  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs 848 x 480 @ 30fps
  • Has a viewfinder: Pentamirror vs None
  • Supports 24p

Significant disadvantages of the T4i (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • Much larger: Professional size (133×100×79 mm) vs Super compact (104×60×17 mm)
  • No image stabilization: None vs
    1. Lens

common strengths of the T4i and Slice

  • Have touch screens