As well as being compared against other compacts, the Kodak Slice is also often compared to entry-level DSLRs, travel zooms, super zooms and ultra compacts. The Kodak Slice's top rivals come from Canon (such as the PowerShot ELPH 110 HS and the PowerShot ELPH 140 IS) and Panasonic (such as the Lumix ZS25 and the Lumix ZS30)

compared toCompact competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Kodak Slice compared to other compact competitors include: it has a much larger screen (3.5" vs 1.8"), has better image stabilization (lens vs digital), has a touch screen, is thinner (0.7" vs 0.9") and is slightly less expensive ($140.99 vs $270.00).

However, on average it has a much narrower aperture (f/4.8 vs f/2.8), records lower quality movies (848 x 480 @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 24fps), has a much narrower wide angle lens (35 mm vs 28 mm), doesn't record high-speed movies (none vs 240 fps) and doesn't record movies in 24p.

Canon PowerShot ELPH 110 HS

Canon PowerShot ELPH 110 HS
2 years newer
$270

Significant advantages of the ELPH 110 HS (vs the Slice)

  • Records high-speed movies: 240 fps vs None
  • Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 35 mm
  • Much wider aperture: f/2.7 vs f/4.8

Significant disadvantages of the ELPH 110 HS (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the ELPH 110 HS and Slice

  • Larger than average screens: 3" vs 3.5"
  • Very small: Super compact (93×57×20 mm) vs Super compact (104×60×17 mm)
  • Good image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs
    1. Lens

Canon PowerShot SD40

Canon PowerShot SD40
3 years older
$199

Significant advantages of the SD40 (vs the Slice)

  • Much wider aperture: f/3.2 vs f/4.8

Significant disadvantages of the SD40 (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 1.8" vs 3.5"
  • No image stabilization: None vs
    1. Lens
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the SD40 and Slice

  • Very small: Super compact (96×45×24 mm) vs Super compact (104×60×17 mm)
  • Thin: 0.9" vs 0.7"
  • Light weight: 120 g vs 158 g

Canon ELPH 100 HS

Canon ELPH 100 HS
1 year newer
$160

Significant advantages of the 100 HS (vs the Slice)

  • Records high-speed movies: 240 fps vs None
  • Much wider aperture: f/2.8 vs f/4.8
  • Much better wide angle: 28 mm vs 35 mm

Significant disadvantages of the 100 HS (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen
  • Significantly slower max shutter speed: 1/1500 of a second vs 1/2000 of a second

common strengths of the 100 HS and Slice

  • Larger than average screens: 3" vs 3.5"
  • Very small: Super compact (93×56×20 mm) vs Super compact (104×60×17 mm)
  • Good image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs
    1. Lens

Fujifilm FinePix Z90

Fujifilm FinePix Z90
1 year newer
$165

Significant advantages of the Z90 (vs the Slice)

  • Much better wide angle: 28 mm vs 35 mm
  • Significantly wider aperture: f/3.9 vs f/4.8

Significant disadvantages of the Z90 (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • Worse image stabilization:
    1. Digital
    vs
    1. Lens

common strengths of the Z90 and Slice

  • Larger than average screens: 3" vs 3.5"
  • Fairly small: Super compact (95×57×20 mm) vs Super compact (104×60×17 mm)
  • Have touch screens

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FP7

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FP7
1 year newer
$190

Significant advantages of the DMC-FP7 (vs the Slice)

  • Much wider aperture: f/3.5 vs f/4.8
  • Much longer exposures: 60 seconds vs 8 seconds

Significant disadvantages of the DMC-FP7 (vs the Slice)

  • None found

common strengths of the DMC-FP7 and Slice

  • Very large screens: 3.5" vs 3.5"
  • Fairly small: Super compact (101×59×18 mm) vs Super compact (104×60×17 mm)
  • Good image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs
    1. Lens

Nikon Coolpix P340

Nikon Coolpix P340
4 years newer
$349

Significant advantages of the P340 (vs the Slice)

  • Much wider aperture: f/1.8 vs f/4.8
  • Records high-speed movies: 240 fps vs None
  • Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 35 mm

Significant disadvantages of the P340 (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen
  • Much larger: Compact (103×58×32 mm) vs Super compact (104×60×17 mm)

common strengths of the P340 and Slice

  • Larger than average screens: 3" vs 3.5"
  • Good image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs
    1. Lens

compared toEntry-level DSLR competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Kodak Slice compared to entry-level DSLR competitors include: it has a much larger screen (3.5" vs 3"), has image stabilization (lens vs none), has a touch screen, is much smaller (super compact (104×60×17 mm) vs professional size (132×101×78 mm)) and is significantly less expensive ($140.99 vs $749.00).

However, on average it records lower quality movies (848 x 480 @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 60fps), takes much lower resolution photos (9.7 MP vs 24 MP), slightly lower maximum light sensitivity (3,200 ISO vs 25,600 ISO), doesn't record movies in 24p and doesn't shoot as fast continuously (3 fps vs 5 fps).

Canon EOS Rebel T6i

Canon EOS Rebel T6i
5 years newer
$799 18-55mm lens

Significant advantages of the T6i (vs the Slice)

  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs 848 x 480 @ 30fps
  • Has a viewfinder: Pentamirror vs None
  • Much higher true resolution: 24 MP vs 9.7 MP

Significant disadvantages of the T6i (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • Much thicker: 3.1" vs 0.7"
  • Much larger: Professional size (132×101×78 mm) vs Super compact (104×60×17 mm)

common strengths of the T6i and Slice

  • Have touch screens

Canon Rebel T3i

Canon Rebel T3i
1 year newer
$749 (body only)
$799 18-55mm lens

Significant advantages of the T3i (vs the Slice)

  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs 848 x 480 @ 30fps
  • Has a viewfinder: Pentamirror vs None
  • Supports 24p

Significant disadvantages of the T3i (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • Much thicker: 3.1" vs 0.7"
  • Much larger: Professional size (133×100×80 mm) vs Super compact (104×60×17 mm)

common strengths of the T3i and Slice

  • None found

Canon EOS Rebel T6s

Canon EOS Rebel T6s
5 years newer

Significant advantages of the T6s (vs the Slice)

  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs 848 x 480 @ 30fps
  • Has a viewfinder: Pentamirror vs None
  • Much higher true resolution: 24 MP vs 9.7 MP

Significant disadvantages of the T6s (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • Much larger: Professional size (132×111×78 mm) vs Super compact (104×60×17 mm)
  • Much thicker: 3.1" vs 0.7"

common strengths of the T6s and Slice

  • Have touch screens

Canon Rebel T4i

Canon Rebel T4i
2 years newer
$699 (body only)
$550 18-55mm lens

Significant advantages of the T4i (vs the Slice)

  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs 848 x 480 @ 30fps
  • Has a viewfinder: Pentamirror vs None
  • Supports 24p

Significant disadvantages of the T4i (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • Much thicker: 3.1" vs 0.7"
  • Much larger: Professional size (133×100×79 mm) vs Super compact (104×60×17 mm)

common strengths of the T4i and Slice

  • Have touch screens

Nikon D3300

Nikon D3300
4 years newer
$329 (body only)
$399 - $547 18-55mm lens

Significant advantages of the D3300 (vs the Slice)

  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 60fps vs 848 x 480 @ 30fps
  • Has a viewfinder: Pentamirror vs None
  • Much higher true resolution: 24.2 MP vs 9.7 MP

Significant disadvantages of the D3300 (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • Much thicker: 3" vs 0.7"
  • No image stabilization: None vs
    1. Lens

common strengths of the D3300 and Slice

  • Fairly small: Prosumer size (124×98×76 mm) vs Super compact (104×60×17 mm)
  • Light weight: 430 g vs 158 g
  • Inexpensive: $329.00 vs $140.99

Nikon D5300

Nikon D5300
3 years newer
$512 - $697 (body only)
$514 - $797 18-55mm lens

Significant advantages of the D5300 (vs the Slice)

  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 60fps vs 848 x 480 @ 30fps
  • Has a viewfinder: Pentamirror vs None
  • Much higher true resolution: 24 MP vs 9.7 MP

Significant disadvantages of the D5300 (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 3.2" vs 3.5"
  • Much thicker: 3" vs 0.7"
  • No image stabilization: None vs
    1. Lens

common strengths of the D5300 and Slice

  • Very large screens: 3.2" vs 3.5"
  • Light weight: 480 g vs 158 g

compared toTravel zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Kodak Slice compared to travel zoom competitors include: it has a much larger screen (3.5" vs 2.7") and has a touch screen.

However, on average it has a much narrower wide angle lens (35 mm vs 25 mm), has a much narrower aperture (f/4.8 vs f/3.2), doesn't record high-speed movies (none vs 220 fps), has a CCD-family sensor (CCD vs CMOS) and lacks a built-in HDR feature.

Panasonic Lumix ZS25

Panasonic Lumix ZS25
3 years newer
$320

Significant advantages of the ZS25 (vs the Slice)

  • Records high-speed movies: 220 fps vs None
  • Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 35 mm
  • Takes 3D photos

Significant disadvantages of the ZS25 (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the ZS25 and Slice

  • Larger than average screens: 3" vs 3.5"

Canon PowerShot ELPH 140 IS

Canon PowerShot ELPH 140 IS
4 years newer
$318

Significant advantages of the ELPH 140 IS (vs the Slice)

  • Much wider aperture: f/3.2 vs f/4.8
  • Significantly better wide angle: 28 mm vs 35 mm
  • Much better macro capability: 1.0 cm vs 10.0 cm

Significant disadvantages of the ELPH 140 IS (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the ELPH 140 IS and Slice

  • None found

Panasonic Lumix ZS30

Panasonic Lumix ZS30
3 years newer
$220

Significant advantages of the ZS30 (vs the Slice)

  • Records high-speed movies: 220 fps vs None
  • Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 35 mm
  • Takes 3D photos

Significant disadvantages of the ZS30 (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"

common strengths of the ZS30 and Slice

  • Larger than average screens: 3" vs 3.5"
  • Have touch screens

Olympus SZ10

Olympus SZ-10
1 year newer
$191

Significant advantages of the SZ10 (vs the Slice)

  • Much wider aperture: f/3.1 vs f/4.8
  • Takes 3D photos
  • Significantly better wide angle: 28 mm vs 35 mm

Significant disadvantages of the SZ10 (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the SZ10 and Slice

  • Larger than average screens: 3" vs 3.5"

Nikon Coolpix S6200

Nikon Coolpix S6200
1 year newer
$124

Significant advantages of the S6200 (vs the Slice)

  • Much better wide angle: 25 mm vs 35 mm
  • Much wider aperture: f/3.2 vs f/4.8

Significant disadvantages of the S6200 (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the S6200 and Slice

  • None found

Samsung HZ30W

Samsung HZ30W
similar age

Significant advantages of the HZ30W (vs the Slice)

  • Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 35 mm
  • Much wider aperture: f/3.2 vs f/4.8
  • Much better macro capability: 3.0 cm vs 10.0 cm

Significant disadvantages of the HZ30W (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the HZ30W and Slice

  • Larger than average screens: 3" vs 3.5"

compared toSuper zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Kodak Slice compared to super zoom competitors include: it has a much larger screen (3.5" vs 3"), is significantly smaller (super compact (104×60×17 mm) vs prosumer size (114×89×96 mm)), has a touch screen, is thinner (0.7" vs 3.8") and is significantly lighter (158 g vs 538 g).

However, on average it has a much narrower aperture (f/4.8 vs f/3), has significantly less zoom (5x vs 41.7x), records lower quality movies (848 x 480 @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 60fps), has a much narrower wide angle lens (35 mm vs 23 mm) and doesn't record high-speed movies (none vs 240 fps).

Nikon Coolpix L840

Nikon Coolpix L840
5 years newer
$220 - $229

Significant advantages of the L840 (vs the Slice)

  • Much wider aperture: f/3 vs f/4.8
  • Much better wide angle: 23 mm vs 35 mm
  • More zoom: 37.2x vs 5x

Significant disadvantages of the L840 (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • Significantly larger: Prosumer size (114×89×96 mm) vs Super compact (104×60×17 mm)
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the L840 and Slice

  • Inexpensive: $219.51 vs $140.99

Nikon Coolpix L830

Nikon Coolpix L830
4 years newer
$198

Significant advantages of the L830 (vs the Slice)

  • Records high-speed movies: 240 fps vs None
  • Much wider aperture: f/3 vs f/4.8
  • Much better wide angle: 22 mm vs 35 mm

Significant disadvantages of the L830 (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • Significantly larger: Prosumer size (111×76×91 mm) vs Super compact (104×60×17 mm)
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the L830 and Slice

  • Fairly small: Prosumer size (111×76×91 mm) vs Super compact (104×60×17 mm)
  • Inexpensive: $198.12 vs $140.99

Nikon Coolpix P530

Nikon Coolpix P530
4 years newer
$230

Significant advantages of the P530 (vs the Slice)

  • Much wider aperture: f/3 vs f/4.8
  • Records high-speed movies: 120 fps vs None
  • Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 35 mm

Significant disadvantages of the P530 (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • Significantly larger: Professional size (123×84×98 mm) vs Super compact (104×60×17 mm)
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the P530 and Slice

  • Light weight: 494 g vs 158 g
  • Inexpensive: $229.99 vs $140.99

Nikon Coolpix P520

Nikon Coolpix P520
3 years newer
$315

Significant advantages of the P520 (vs the Slice)

  • Much wider aperture: f/3 vs f/4.8
  • Records high-speed movies: 120 fps vs None
  • Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 35 mm

Significant disadvantages of the P520 (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 3.2" vs 3.5"
  • Much larger: Professional size (125×84×102 mm) vs Super compact (104×60×17 mm)
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the P520 and Slice

  • Very large screens: 3.2" vs 3.5"
  • Inexpensive: $315.00 vs $140.99

Nikon Coolpix L820

Nikon Coolpix L820
3 years newer
$164

Significant advantages of the L820 (vs the Slice)

  • Records high-speed movies: 240 fps vs None
  • Much wider aperture: f/3 vs f/4.8
  • Much better wide angle: 23 mm vs 35 mm

Significant disadvantages of the L820 (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen
  • Significantly larger: Prosumer size (111×76×85 mm) vs Super compact (104×60×17 mm)

common strengths of the L820 and Slice

  • Fairly small: Prosumer size (111×76×85 mm) vs Super compact (104×60×17 mm)
  • Thin: 3.3" vs 0.7"
  • Light weight: 470 g vs 158 g

compared toUltra compact competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Kodak Slice compared to ultra compact competitors include: it has a much larger screen (3.5" vs 2.5"), has better image stabilization (lens vs sensor shift), has a touch screen, shoots faster continuously (3 fps vs 0.7 fps) and has a faster max shutter speed (1/2000 of a second vs 1/1500 of a second).

However, on average it has a much narrower aperture (f/4.8 vs f/3.2), has a much narrower wide angle lens (35 mm vs 26 mm), lacks built-in panoramas, significantly worse macro focusing (10.0 cm vs 3.0 cm) and doesn't have a viewfinder (none vs tunnel).

Nikon Coolpix S3100

Nikon Coolpix S3100
1 year newer
$140

Significant advantages of the S3100 (vs the Slice)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the S3100 (vs the Slice)

  • None found

common strengths of the S3100 and Slice

  • None found

Canon PowerShot SD780 IS

Canon PowerShot SD780 IS
10 months older
$300

Significant advantages of the SD780 IS (vs the Slice)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the SD780 IS (vs the Slice)

  • None found

common strengths of the SD780 IS and Slice

  • None found