As well as being compared against other compacts, the Kodak Slice is also often compared to ultra compacts, entry-level DSLRs, travel zooms and super zooms. The Kodak Slice's top rivals come from Canon (such as the Rebel T4i and the PowerShot SD40) and Kodak (such as the EasyShare M590 and the EasyShare Z915)

compared toCompact competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Kodak Slice compared to other compact competitors include: it has a much larger screen (3.5" vs 2.7"), has better image stabilization (lens vs digital), has a touch screen, is thinner (0.7" vs 0.9") and has a faster max shutter speed (1/2000 of a second vs 1/1600 of a second).

However, on average it has a much narrower aperture (f/4.8 vs f/3.2), records lower quality movies (848 x 480 @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 24fps), has a much narrower wide angle lens (35 mm vs 28 mm), doesn't record high-speed movies (none vs 240 fps) and doesn't record movies in 24p.

Canon PowerShot SD40

Canon PowerShot SD40
3 years older
$360

Significant advantages of the SD40 (vs the Slice)

  • Much wider aperture: f/3.2 vs f/4.8

Significant disadvantages of the SD40 (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 1.8" vs 3.5"
  • No image stabilization: None vs
    1. Lens
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the SD40 and Slice

  • Fairly small: Super compact (96×45×24 mm) vs Super compact (104×60×17 mm)
  • Thin: 0.9" vs 0.7"

Nikon Coolpix S70

Nikon Coolpix S70
5 months older
$180

Significant advantages of the S70 (vs the Slice)

  • Much better wide angle: 28 mm vs 35 mm
  • Has an OLED screen: OLED vs LCD
  • Significantly wider aperture: f/3.9 vs f/4.8

Significant disadvantages of the S70 (vs the Slice)

  • None found

common strengths of the S70 and Slice

  • Very large screens: 3.5" vs 3.5"
  • Fairly small: Super compact (97×61×20 mm) vs Super compact (104×60×17 mm)
  • Good image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs
    1. Lens

Nikon Coolpix L31

Nikon Coolpix L31
5 years newer
$100

Significant advantages of the L31 (vs the Slice)

  • Much better wide angle: 26 mm vs 35 mm
  • Much wider aperture: f/3.2 vs f/4.8
  • Has a flip-out screen

Significant disadvantages of the L31 (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.5"
  • Worse image stabilization:
    1. Digital
    vs
    1. Lens
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the L31 and Slice

  • None found

Canon ELPH 100 HS

Canon ELPH 100 HS
1 year newer
$160

Significant advantages of the 100 HS (vs the Slice)

  • Much wider aperture: f/2.8 vs f/4.8
  • Much better wide angle: 28 mm vs 35 mm
  • Records high-speed movies: 240 fps vs None

Significant disadvantages of the 100 HS (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen
  • Significantly slower max shutter speed: 1/1500 of a second vs 1/2000 of a second

common strengths of the 100 HS and Slice

  • Larger than average screens: 3" vs 3.5"
  • Fairly small: Super compact (93×56×20 mm) vs Super compact (104×60×17 mm)
  • Good image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs
    1. Lens

Canon ELPH 300 HS

Canon ELPH 300 HS
1 year newer
$319

Significant advantages of the 300 HS (vs the Slice)

  • Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 35 mm
  • Much wider aperture: f/2.7 vs f/4.8
  • Records high-speed movies: 240 fps vs None

Significant disadvantages of the 300 HS (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the 300 HS and Slice

  • Fairly small: Super compact (92×56×20 mm) vs Super compact (104×60×17 mm)
  • Good image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs
    1. Lens
  • Thin: 0.8" vs 0.7"

Nikon Coolpix S80

Nikon Coolpix S80
8 months newer
$162

Significant advantages of the S80 (vs the Slice)

  • Significantly wider aperture: f/3.6 vs f/4.8
  • Has an OLED screen: OLED vs LCD
  • Supports 24p

Significant disadvantages of the S80 (vs the Slice)

  • Significantly slower max shutter speed: 1/1500 of a second vs 1/2000 of a second

common strengths of the S80 and Slice

  • Very large screens: 3.5" vs 3.5"
  • Fairly small: Super compact (99×63×17 mm) vs Super compact (104×60×17 mm)
  • Good image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs
    1. Lens

compared toUltra compact competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Kodak Slice compared to ultra compact competitors include: it has a much larger screen (3.5" vs 2.7"), has a touch screen and has a faster max shutter speed (1/2000 of a second vs 1/1200 of a second).

However, on average it has a significantly narrower aperture (f/4.8 vs f/3.5), records lower quality movies (848 x 480 @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 60fps), has a much narrower wide angle lens (35 mm vs 28 mm), has a CCD-family sensor (CCD vs CMOS) and doesn't have an OLED screen (LCD vs OLED).

Kodak EasyShare M590

Kodak EasyShare M590
7 months newer
$119

Significant advantages of the M590 (vs the Slice)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the M590 (vs the Slice)

  • None found

common strengths of the M590 and Slice

  • None found

Canon PowerShot SD780 IS

Canon PowerShot SD780 IS
10 months older
$239

Significant advantages of the SD780 IS (vs the Slice)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the SD780 IS (vs the Slice)

  • None found

common strengths of the SD780 IS and Slice

  • None found

Sony Cybershot T110

Sony Cybershot DSC-T110
1 year newer
$171

Significant advantages of the T110 (vs the Slice)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the T110 (vs the Slice)

  • None found

common strengths of the T110 and Slice

  • None found

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX200V

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX200V
2 years newer

Significant advantages of the DSC-TX200V (vs the Slice)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-TX200V (vs the Slice)

  • None found

common strengths of the DSC-TX200V and Slice

  • None found

Kodak Easyshare M5370

Kodak Easyshare M5370
1 year newer
$179

Significant advantages of the M5370 (vs the Slice)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the M5370 (vs the Slice)

  • None found

common strengths of the M5370 and Slice

  • None found

Sony Cybershot TX10

Sony Cybershot DSC-TX10
1 year newer
$389

Significant advantages of the TX10 (vs the Slice)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the TX10 (vs the Slice)

  • None found

common strengths of the TX10 and Slice

  • None found

compared toEntry-level DSLR competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Kodak Slice compared to entry-level DSLR competitors include: it has a much larger screen (3.5" vs 3"), has image stabilization (lens vs none), has a touch screen, is much smaller (super compact (104×60×17 mm) vs professional size (133×100×79 mm)) and is significantly less expensive ($221.99 vs $678.00).

However, on average it records lower quality movies (848 x 480 @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps), takes much lower resolution photos (9.7 MP vs 24.1 MP), doesn't record movies in 24p, doesn't shoot as fast continuously (3 fps vs 5 fps) and doesn't have a screen which flips out.

Canon Rebel T4i

Canon Rebel T4i
2 years newer
$825 (body only)
$678 18-55mm lens

Significant advantages of the T4i (vs the Slice)

  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs 848 x 480 @ 30fps
  • Has a viewfinder: Pentamirror vs None
  • Supports 24p

Significant disadvantages of the T4i (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • No image stabilization: None vs
    1. Lens
  • Much thicker: 3.1" vs 0.7"

common strengths of the T4i and Slice

  • Have touch screens

Nikon D3200

Nikon D3200
2 years newer
$389 (body only)
$399 - $699 18-55mm lens

Significant advantages of the D3200 (vs the Slice)

  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs 848 x 480 @ 30fps
  • Has a viewfinder: Pentamirror vs None
  • Much higher true resolution: 24.1 MP vs 9.7 MP

Significant disadvantages of the D3200 (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • No image stabilization: None vs
    1. Lens
  • Much thicker: 3" vs 0.7"

common strengths of the D3200 and Slice

  • Light weight: 505 g vs 158 g
  • Inexpensive: $389.00 vs $221.99

Canon Rebel T3i

Canon Rebel T3i
1 year newer
$499 (body only)
$759 18-55mm lens

Significant advantages of the T3i (vs the Slice)

  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs 848 x 480 @ 30fps
  • Has a viewfinder: Pentamirror vs None
  • Supports 24p

Significant disadvantages of the T3i (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • No image stabilization: None vs
    1. Lens
  • Much thicker: 3.1" vs 0.7"

common strengths of the T3i and Slice

  • Inexpensive: $499.00 vs $221.99

compared toTravel zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Kodak Slice compared to travel zoom competitors include: it has a much larger screen (3.5" vs 2.7") and has a touch screen.

However, on average it has a much narrower wide angle lens (35 mm vs 25 mm), has a much narrower aperture (f/4.8 vs f/3.2), has a CCD-family sensor (CCD vs CMOS), lacks a built-in HDR feature and lacks built-in panoramas.

Kodak EasyShare Z915

Kodak EasyShare Z915
1 year older
$280

Significant advantages of the Z915 (vs the Slice)

  • Significantly wider aperture: f/3.5 vs f/4.8

Significant disadvantages of the Z915 (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 2.5" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the Z915 and Slice

  • None found

Canon PowerShot ELPH 140 IS

Canon PowerShot ELPH 140 IS
4 years newer

Significant advantages of the ELPH 140 IS (vs the Slice)

  • Much better wide angle: 28 mm vs 35 mm
  • Much wider aperture: f/3.2 vs f/4.8

Significant disadvantages of the ELPH 140 IS (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the ELPH 140 IS and Slice

  • None found

Canon PowerShot ELPH 150 IS

Canon PowerShot ELPH 150 IS
4 years newer
$173

Significant advantages of the ELPH 150 IS (vs the Slice)

  • Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 35 mm
  • Much wider aperture: f/3 vs f/4.8

Significant disadvantages of the ELPH 150 IS (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the ELPH 150 IS and Slice

  • None found

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX300

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX300
3 years newer
$270

Significant advantages of the DSC-WX300 (vs the Slice)

  • Much better wide angle: 25 mm vs 35 mm
  • Significantly wider aperture: f/3.5 vs f/4.8
  • Has a CMOS-family sensor: CMOS vs CCD

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-WX300 (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the DSC-WX300 and Slice

  • Larger than average screens: 3" vs 3.5"

Nikon Coolpix S6300

Nikon Coolpix S6300
2 years newer
$200

Significant advantages of the S6300 (vs the Slice)

  • Much better wide angle: 25 mm vs 35 mm
  • Much wider aperture: f/3.2 vs f/4.8
  • Has a CMOS-family sensor: CMOS vs CCD

Significant disadvantages of the S6300 (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the S6300 and Slice

  • None found

Canon PowerShot SX150 IS

Canon PowerShot SX150 IS
1 year newer
$65

Significant advantages of the SX150 IS (vs the Slice)

  • Much better wide angle: 28 mm vs 35 mm
  • Much wider aperture: f/3.4 vs f/4.8

Significant disadvantages of the SX150 IS (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the SX150 IS and Slice

  • Larger than average screens: 3" vs 3.5"

compared toSuper zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Kodak Slice compared to super zoom competitors include: it has a much larger screen (3.5" vs 3"), is significantly smaller (super compact (104×60×17 mm) vs professional size (116×84×103 mm)), has better image stabilization (lens vs sensor shift), has a touch screen and is thinner (0.7" vs 4.1").

However, on average it has a much narrower aperture (f/4.8 vs f/2.9), has much less zoom (5x vs 40x), has a much narrower wide angle lens (35 mm vs 23 mm), doesn't record high-speed movies (none vs 240 fps) and doesn't have a screen which flips out.

Canon PowerShot SX410 IS

Canon PowerShot SX410 IS
5 years newer
$170

Significant advantages of the SX410 IS (vs the Slice)

  • Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 35 mm
  • Significantly wider aperture: f/3.5 vs f/4.8
  • Significantly more zoom: 40x vs 5x

Significant disadvantages of the SX410 IS (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen
  • Larger: Standard size (104×69×85 mm) vs Super compact (104×60×17 mm)

common strengths of the SX410 IS and Slice

  • Fairly small: Standard size (104×69×85 mm) vs Super compact (104×60×17 mm)
  • Light weight: 325 g vs 158 g
  • Thin: 3.3" vs 0.7"

Kodak PixPro AZ361

Kodak PixPro AZ361
3 years newer
$227

Significant advantages of the AZ361 (vs the Slice)

  • Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 35 mm
  • Much wider aperture: f/2.9 vs f/4.8
  • Significantly more zoom: 36x vs 5x

Significant disadvantages of the AZ361 (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • Significantly larger: Prosumer size (113×82×77 mm) vs Super compact (104×60×17 mm)
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the AZ361 and Slice

  • Fairly small: Prosumer size (113×82×77 mm) vs Super compact (104×60×17 mm)
  • Thin: 3" vs 0.7"
  • Light weight: 416 g vs 158 g

Nikon Coolpix P500

Nikon Coolpix P500
1 year newer
$499

Significant advantages of the P500 (vs the Slice)

  • Records high-speed movies: 240 fps vs None
  • Much better wide angle: 23 mm vs 35 mm
  • Significantly wider aperture: f/3.5 vs f/4.8

Significant disadvantages of the P500 (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • Significantly larger: Professional size (116×84×103 mm) vs Super compact (104×60×17 mm)
  • Worse image stabilization:
    1. Sensor shift
    vs
    1. Lens

common strengths of the P500 and Slice

  • Light weight: 481 g vs 158 g