As well as being compared against other compacts, the Kodak Slice is also often compared to travel zooms, ultra compacts, super zooms and entry-level DSLRs. The Kodak Slice's top rivals come from Panasonic (such as the Lumix DMC-TZ3 and the Lumix DMC-FH25) and Nikon (such as the Coolpix S80 and the Coolpix P310)

compared toCompact competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Kodak Slice compared to other compact competitors include: it has a significantly larger screen (3.5" vs 2.7"), has better image stabilization (lens vs digital), has a touch screen, is thinner (0.7" vs 0.8") and is slightly less expensive ($104.99 vs $219.00).

However, on average it has a much narrower aperture (f/4.8 vs f/3.2), records lower quality movies (848 x 480 @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 24fps), has a significantly narrower wide angle lens (35 mm vs 28 mm), doesn't record movies in 24p and doesn't have an OLED screen (LCD vs OLED).

Nikon Coolpix S80

Nikon Coolpix S80
8 months newer
$130

Significant advantages of the S80 (vs the Slice)

  • Much wider aperture: f/3.6 vs f/4.8
  • Supports 24p
  • Has an OLED screen: OLED vs LCD

Significant disadvantages of the S80 (vs the Slice)

  • Slower max shutter speed: 1/1500 of a second vs 1/2000 of a second

common strengths of the S80 and Slice

  • Very large screens: 3.5" vs 3.5"
  • Fairly small: Super compact 99x63x17 mm vs Super compact 104x60x17 mm
  • Have touch screens

Sony Cybershot DSC-W620

Sony Cybershot DSC-W620
2 years newer
$90

Significant advantages of the DSC-W620 (vs the Slice)

  • Much wider aperture: f/3.2 vs f/4.8
  • Significantly better wide angle: 28 mm vs 35 mm
  • Much better macro capability: 5 cm vs 10 cm

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-W620 (vs the Slice)

  • No image stabilization: None vs Lens
  • Much smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the DSC-W620 and Slice

  • Fairly small: Super compact 98x56x20 mm vs Super compact 104x60x17 mm
  • Thin: 0.8" vs 0.7"
  • Inexpensive: $90.00 vs $104.99

Fujifilm FinePix Z90

Fujifilm FinePix Z90
1 year newer
$269

Significant advantages of the Z90 (vs the Slice)

  • Significantly wider aperture: f/3.9 vs f/4.8
  • Significantly better wide angle: 28 mm vs 35 mm

Significant disadvantages of the Z90 (vs the Slice)

  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • Worse image stabilization: Digital vs Lens

common strengths of the Z90 and Slice

  • Fairly small: Super compact 95x56x20 mm vs Super compact 104x60x17 mm
  • Have touch screens
  • Thin: 0.8" vs 0.7"

Canon PowerShot SD1300 IS

Canon PowerShot SD1300 IS
similar age
$219

Significant advantages of the SD1300 IS (vs the Slice)

  • Much wider aperture: f/2.8 vs f/4.8
  • Significantly better wide angle: 28 mm vs 35 mm
  • Much better macro capability: 3 cm vs 10 cm

Significant disadvantages of the SD1300 IS (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen
  • Slower max shutter speed: 1/1500 of a second vs 1/2000 of a second

common strengths of the SD1300 IS and Slice

  • Fairly small: Super compact 91x56x22 mm vs Super compact 104x60x17 mm
  • Thin: 0.9" vs 0.7"

Canon ELPH 320 HS

Canon PowerShot ELPH 320 HS
2 years newer
$159

Significant advantages of the 320 HS (vs the Slice)

  • Much wider aperture: f/2.7 vs f/4.8
  • Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 35 mm
  • Supports 24p

Significant disadvantages of the 320 HS (vs the Slice)

  • None found

common strengths of the 320 HS and Slice

  • Larger than average screens: 3.2" vs 3.5"
  • Fairly small: Super compact 94x57x21 mm vs Super compact 104x60x17 mm
  • Have touch screens

Panasonic Lumix DMC-TS10

Panasonic Lumix DMC-TS10
6 months newer
$303

Significant advantages of the DMC-TS10 (vs the Slice)

  • Much wider aperture: f/3.5 vs f/4.8
  • Much better macro capability: 5 cm vs 10 cm
  • Waterproof

Significant disadvantages of the DMC-TS10 (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the DMC-TS10 and Slice

  • Fairly small: Compact 100x64x22 mm vs Super compact 104x60x17 mm
  • Thin: 0.9" vs 0.7"

compared toTravel zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Kodak Slice compared to travel zoom competitors include: it has a significantly larger screen (3.5" vs 2.7"), is slightly smaller (super compact 104x60x17 mm vs compact 104x58x28 mm), has a touch screen, is thinner (0.7" vs 1.1") and is slightly lighter (158 g vs 193 g).

However, on average it has slightly less zoom (5x vs 20x), has a significantly narrower wide angle lens (35 mm vs 24 mm), has a much narrower aperture (f/4.8 vs f/3.3), records lower quality movies (848 x 480 @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 24fps) and doesn't record high-speed movies (none vs 220 fps).

Panasonic Lumix DMC-TZ3

Panasonic Lumix DMC-TZ3
2 years older

Significant advantages of the DMC-TZ3 (vs the Slice)

  • Much wider aperture: f/3.3 vs f/4.8
  • Significantly better wide angle: 28 mm vs 35 mm
  • Much better macro capability: 5 cm vs 10 cm

Significant disadvantages of the DMC-TZ3 (vs the Slice)

  • Much larger: Compact 105x59x37 mm vs Super compact 104x60x17 mm
  • No touch screen
  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"

common strengths of the DMC-TZ3 and Slice

  • None found

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH25

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH25
1 year newer
$279

Significant advantages of the DMC-FH25 (vs the Slice)

  • Much wider aperture: f/3.3 vs f/4.8
  • Significantly better wide angle: 28 mm vs 35 mm
  • Much better macro capability: 5 cm vs 10 cm

Significant disadvantages of the DMC-FH25 (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen
  • Larger: Compact 99x56x27 mm vs Super compact 104x60x17 mm

common strengths of the DMC-FH25 and Slice

  • Fairly small: Compact 99x56x27 mm vs Super compact 104x60x17 mm
  • Light weight: 135 g vs 158 g

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH20

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH20
similar age

Significant advantages of the DMC-FH20 (vs the Slice)

  • Much wider aperture: f/3.3 vs f/4.8
  • Significantly better wide angle: 28 mm vs 35 mm
  • Much better macro capability: 5 cm vs 10 cm

Significant disadvantages of the DMC-FH20 (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen
  • Larger: Compact 100x56x28 mm vs Super compact 104x60x17 mm

common strengths of the DMC-FH20 and Slice

  • Fairly small: Compact 100x56x28 mm vs Super compact 104x60x17 mm

Canon PowerShot ELPH 520 HS

Canon ELPH 520 HS
2 years newer
$150

Significant advantages of the ELPH 520 HS (vs the Slice)

  • Much wider aperture: f/3.4 vs f/4.8
  • Significantly better wide angle: 28 mm vs 35 mm
  • Supports 24p

Significant disadvantages of the ELPH 520 HS (vs the Slice)

  • No touch screen
  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"

common strengths of the ELPH 520 HS and Slice

  • Very small: Ultra compact 87x54x19 mm vs Super compact 104x60x17 mm
  • Very thin: 0.7" vs 0.7"
  • Light weight: 155 g vs 158 g

Panasonic Lumix ZS30

Panasonic Lumix ZS30
3 years newer
$249

Significant advantages of the ZS30 (vs the Slice)

  • Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 35 mm
  • Much wider aperture: f/3.3 vs f/4.8
  • Has a GPS

Significant disadvantages of the ZS30 (vs the Slice)

  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • Significantly larger: Compact 105x59x28 mm vs Super compact 104x60x17 mm
  • Significantly thicker: 1.1" vs 0.7"

common strengths of the ZS30 and Slice

  • Have touch screens

Panasonic Lumix ZS25

Panasonic Lumix ZS25
3 years newer
$200

Significant advantages of the ZS25 (vs the Slice)

  • Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 35 mm
  • Much wider aperture: f/3.3 vs f/4.8
  • Significantly more zoom: 20x vs 5x

Significant disadvantages of the ZS25 (vs the Slice)

  • No touch screen
  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • Significantly larger: Compact 104x58x28 mm vs Super compact 104x60x17 mm

common strengths of the ZS25 and Slice

  • None found

compared toUltra compact competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Kodak Slice compared to ultra compact competitors include: it has a much larger screen (3.5" vs 2.7"), has a touch screen, is slightly less expensive ($104.99 vs $288.02) and has a faster max shutter speed (1/2000 of a second vs 1/1600 of a second).

However, on average it has a much narrower aperture (f/4.8 vs f/2.8), records lower quality movies (848 x 480 @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps), has a significantly narrower wide angle lens (35 mm vs 26 mm), slightly lower maximum light sensitivity (3,200 ISO vs 6,400 ISO) and doesn't shoot as fast continuously (3 fps vs 10 fps).

Canon PowerShot SD780 IS

Canon PowerShot SD780 IS
10 months older
$398

Significant advantages of the SD780 IS (vs the Slice)

  • Much wider aperture: f/3.2 vs f/4.8
  • Much better macro capability: 3 cm vs 10 cm
  • Has a viewfinder: Tunnel vs None

Significant disadvantages of the SD780 IS (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 2.5" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen
  • Slower max shutter speed: 1/1500 of a second vs 1/2000 of a second

common strengths of the SD780 IS and Slice

  • Each has a built-in flash
  • Very good image stabilization: Lens vs Lens
  • Very thin: 0.7" vs 0.7"

Panasonic Lumix DMC-XS1

Panasonic Lumix DMC-XS1
3 years newer
$112

Significant advantages of the DMC-XS1 (vs the Slice)

  • Much wider aperture: f/2.8 vs f/4.8
  • Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 35 mm
  • Can create panoramas in-camera

Significant disadvantages of the DMC-XS1 (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the DMC-XS1 and Slice

  • Each has a built-in flash
  • Very good image stabilization: Lens vs Lens
  • Very thin: 0.7" vs 0.7"

Sony Cyber-shot WX50

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX50
2 years newer
$236

Significant advantages of the WX50 (vs the Slice)

  • Much wider aperture: f/2.6 vs f/4.8
  • Much better wide angle: 25 mm vs 35 mm
  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 60fps vs 848 x 480 @ 30fps

Significant disadvantages of the WX50 (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the WX50 and Slice

  • Each has a built-in flash
  • Very good image stabilization: Lens vs Lens
  • Very thin: 0.7" vs 0.7"

Sony Cybershot DSC-TX55

Sony Cybershot DSC-TX55
1 year newer
$288

Significant advantages of the DSC-TX55 (vs the Slice)

  • Much wider aperture: f/3.5 vs f/4.8
  • Much better wide angle: 26 mm vs 35 mm
  • Has an OLED screen: OLED vs LCD

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-TX55 (vs the Slice)

  • None found

common strengths of the DSC-TX55 and Slice

  • Each has a built-in flash
  • Very large screens: 3.3" vs 3.5"
  • Very good image stabilization: Lens vs Lens

Samsung ST95

Samsung ST95
1 year newer
$170

Significant advantages of the ST95 (vs the Slice)

  • Much wider aperture: f/3.3 vs f/4.8
  • Much better wide angle: 26 mm vs 35 mm
  • Much better macro capability: 5 cm vs 10 cm

Significant disadvantages of the ST95 (vs the Slice)

  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • Worse image stabilization: Digital vs Lens

common strengths of the ST95 and Slice

  • Each has a built-in flash
  • Larger than average screens: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • Good image stabilization: Digital vs Lens

compared toSuper zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Kodak Slice compared to super zoom competitors include: it has a significantly larger screen (3.5" vs 3.0"), is significantly smaller (super compact 104x60x17 mm vs professional size 124x86x93 mm), has a touch screen, is thinner (0.7" vs 3.6") and is significantly lighter (158 g vs 589 g).

However, on average it has a much narrower aperture (f/4.8 vs f/2.8), has slightly less zoom (5x vs 34.8x), records lower quality movies (848 x 480 @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps), has a much narrower wide angle lens (35 mm vs 23 mm) and doesn't record high-speed movies (none vs 240 fps).

Nikon Coolpix L820

Nikon Coolpix L820
3 years newer
$149

Significant advantages of the L820 (vs the Slice)

  • Much wider aperture: f/3.0 vs f/4.8
  • Much better wide angle: 23 mm vs 35 mm
  • Takes 3D photos

Significant disadvantages of the L820 (vs the Slice)

  • No touch screen
  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • Significantly larger: Prosumer size 111x76x85 mm vs Super compact 104x60x17 mm

common strengths of the L820 and Slice

  • Fairly small: Prosumer size 111x76x85 mm vs Super compact 104x60x17 mm
  • Light weight: 470 g vs 158 g
  • Inexpensive: $149.00 vs $104.99

Nikon Coolpix L830

Nikon Coolpix L830
4 years newer
$185 - $237

Significant advantages of the L830 (vs the Slice)

  • Much wider aperture: f/3.0 vs f/4.8
  • Much better wide angle: 22 mm vs 35 mm
  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs 848 x 480 @ 30fps

Significant disadvantages of the L830 (vs the Slice)

  • No touch screen
  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • Significantly larger: Prosumer size 111x75x91 mm vs Super compact 104x60x17 mm

common strengths of the L830 and Slice

  • Fairly small: Prosumer size 111x75x91 mm vs Super compact 104x60x17 mm
  • Inexpensive: $184.99 vs $104.99

Kodak Easyshare Z990 MAX

Kodak Easyshare Z990 MAX
1 year newer

Significant advantages of the Z990 MAX (vs the Slice)

  • Much wider aperture: f/2.8 vs f/4.8
  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs 848 x 480 @ 30fps
  • Much better macro capability: 1 cm vs 10 cm

Significant disadvantages of the Z990 MAX (vs the Slice)

  • Significantly larger: Professional size 124x86x93 mm vs Super compact 104x60x17 mm
  • No touch screen
  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"

common strengths of the Z990 MAX and Slice

  • None found

compared toEntry-level DSLR competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Kodak Slice compared to entry-level DSLR competitors include: it has a much larger screen (3.5" vs 3.0"), has image stabilization (lens vs none), has a touch screen, is much smaller (super compact 104x60x17 mm vs professional size 133x99x79 mm) and is significantly less expensive ($104.99 vs $599.00).

However, on average it records lower quality movies (848 x 480 @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps), takes much lower resolution photos (9.7 MP vs 17.9 MP), doesn't record movies in 24p, doesn't shoot as fast continuously (3 fps vs 5 fps) and doesn't have a screen which flips out.

Canon Rebel T5i

Canon Rebel T5i
3 years newer
$599 - $699 (body only)
$620 - $700 18-55mm lens

Significant advantages of the T5i (vs the Slice)

  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs 848 x 480 @ 30fps
  • Has a viewfinder: Pentamirror vs None
  • Faster autofocus: Phase detection vs Contrast detection

Significant disadvantages of the T5i (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • Much larger: Professional size 133x100x79 mm vs Super compact 104x60x17 mm
  • No image stabilization: None vs Lens

common strengths of the T5i and Slice

  • Have touch screens

Canon Rebel T3i

Canon Rebel T3i
1 year newer
$499 - $539 (body only)
$553 - $599 18-55mm lens

Significant advantages of the T3i (vs the Slice)

  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs 848 x 480 @ 30fps
  • Has a viewfinder: Pentamirror vs None
  • Faster autofocus: Phase detection vs Contrast detection

Significant disadvantages of the T3i (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • Much larger: Professional size 133x99x79 mm vs Super compact 104x60x17 mm
  • No image stabilization: None vs Lens

common strengths of the T3i and Slice

  • None found