As well as being compared against other compacts, the Kodak Slice is also often compared to boutiques, mirrorless, ultra compacts, super zooms, travel zooms and entry-level DSLRs. The Kodak Slice's top rivals come from Sony (such as the Cyber-shot DSC-R1 and the Alpha A6000) and Nikon (such as the Coolpix S80 and the Coolpix P520)

compared toCompact competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Kodak Slice compared to other compact competitors include: it has a much larger screen (3.5" vs 2.7"), is slightly smaller (super compact 104x60x17 mm vs compact 87x57x28 mm), has better image stabilization (lens vs digital), takes slightly higher resolution photos (9.7 MP vs 3.9 MP) and has a touch screen.

However, on average it has a much narrower aperture (f/4.8 vs f/2.8), records lower quality movies (848 x 480 @ 30fps vs 720p @ 24fps), has a significantly narrower wide angle lens (35 mm vs 28 mm), doesn't record movies in 24p and doesn't have an OLED screen (LCD vs OLED).

Nikon Coolpix S80

Nikon Coolpix S80
8 months newer

Significant advantages of the S80 (vs the Slice)

  • Much wider aperture: f/3.6 vs f/4.8
  • Supports 24p
  • Has an OLED screen: OLED vs LCD

Significant disadvantages of the S80 (vs the Slice)

  • None found

common strengths of the S80 and Slice

  • Very large screens: 3.5" vs 3.5"
  • Fairly small: Super compact 99x63x17 mm vs Super compact 104x60x17 mm
  • Good image stabilization: Lens vs Lens
arrow Compare the Nikon Coolpix S80 vs the Kodak Slice

Olympus VG-180

Olympus VG-180
3 years newer

Significant advantages of the VG-180 (vs the Slice)

  • Much wider aperture: f/2.8 vs f/4.8
  • Much better wide angle: 26 mm vs 35 mm
  • Much better macro capability: 1 cm vs 10 cm

Significant disadvantages of the VG-180 (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.5"
  • Significantly larger: Compact 104x60x28 mm vs Super compact 104x60x17 mm
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the VG-180 and Slice

  • None found
arrow Compare the Olympus VG-180 vs the Kodak Slice

Fujifilm FinePix Z90

Fujifilm FinePix Z90
1 year newer
$149

Significant advantages of the Z90 (vs the Slice)

  • Significantly wider aperture: f/3.9 vs f/4.8
  • Much better wide angle: 28 mm vs 35 mm

Significant disadvantages of the Z90 (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • Worse image stabilization: Digital vs Lens

common strengths of the Z90 and Slice

  • Fairly small: Super compact 95x56x20 mm vs Super compact 104x60x17 mm
  • Have touch screens
  • Thin: 0.8" vs 0.7"
arrow Compare the Fujifilm FinePix Z90 vs the Kodak Slice

Canon PowerShot S410

Placeholder
5 years older

Significant advantages of the S410 (vs the Slice)

  • Much wider aperture: f/2.8 vs f/4.8
  • Significantly better macro capability: 5 cm vs 10 cm
  • Has a viewfinder: Tunnel vs None

Significant disadvantages of the S410 (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 1.5" vs 3.5"
  • No image stabilization: None vs Lens
  • Much lower true resolution: 3.9 MP vs 9.7 MP

common strengths of the S410 and Slice

  • None found
arrow Compare the Canon PowerShot S410 vs the Kodak Slice

Olympus VG-160

Olympus VG-160
2 years newer
$65 - $100

Significant advantages of the VG-160 (vs the Slice)

  • Much wider aperture: f/2.8 vs f/4.8
  • Much better wide angle: 26 mm vs 35 mm
  • Much better macro capability: 2 cm vs 10 cm

Significant disadvantages of the VG-160 (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen
  • Worse image stabilization: Digital vs Lens

common strengths of the VG-160 and Slice

  • Fairly small: Super compact 96x57x19 mm vs Super compact 104x60x17 mm
  • Thin: 0.7" vs 0.7"
arrow Compare the Olympus VG-160 vs the Kodak Slice

Nikon Coolpix P310

Nikon Coolpix P310
2 years newer
$370

Significant advantages of the P310 (vs the Slice)

  • Much wider aperture: f/1.8 vs f/4.8
  • Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 35 mm
  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs 848 x 480 @ 30fps

Significant disadvantages of the P310 (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • Significantly larger: Compact 103x58x32 mm vs Super compact 104x60x17 mm
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the P310 and Slice

  • Good image stabilization: Lens vs Lens
arrow Compare the Nikon Coolpix P310 vs the Kodak Slice

compared toBoutique competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Kodak Slice compared to boutique competitors include: it records higher quality movies (848 x 480 @ 30fps vs none), has a much larger screen (3.5" vs 2.0"), is much smaller (super compact 104x60x17 mm vs large 139x168x97 mm), has image stabilization (lens vs none) and has a touch screen.

However, on average it has a much narrower aperture (f/4.8 vs f/2.8), has a significantly narrower wide angle lens (35 mm vs 24 mm), has a slightly smaller sensor (1/2.3" 6.2x4.6mm vs sigma x3 21.5x14.4mm), doesn't shoot RAW and has a CCD-family sensor (CCD vs CMOS).

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-R1

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-R1
4 years older

Significant advantages of the DSC-R1 (vs the Slice)

  • Much wider aperture: f/2.8 vs f/4.8
  • Significantly better wide angle: 24 mm vs 35 mm
  • Shoots RAW

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-R1 (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 2.0" vs 3.5"
  • Much larger: Large 139x168x97 mm vs Super compact 104x60x17 mm
  • No image stabilization: None vs Lens

common strengths of the DSC-R1 and Slice

  • Incredible zoom: 5x vs 5x
arrow Compare the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-R1 vs the Kodak Slice

compared toMirrorless interchangeable-lens competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Kodak Slice compared to mirrorless interchangeable-lens competitors include: it has a significantly larger screen (3.5" vs 3.0"), has better image stabilization (lens vs none), has a touch screen, is significantly smaller (super compact 104x60x17 mm vs standard size 123x71x55 mm) and is thinner (0.7" vs 2.2").

However, on average it records lower quality movies (848 x 480 @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 60fps), doesn't have a viewfinder (none vs digital), takes much lower resolution photos (9.7 MP vs 24.3 MP), much lower maximum light sensitivity (3,200 ISO vs 25,600 ISO) and doesn't record movies in 24p.

Panasonic GX7

Panasonic GX7
3 years newer
$745 - $809 (body only)
$925 - $1,098 14-42mm lens

Significant advantages of the GX7 (vs the Slice)

  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 60fps vs 848 x 480 @ 30fps
  • Shoots RAW
  • Has a viewfinder: Digital vs None

Significant disadvantages of the GX7 (vs the Slice)

  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • Significantly larger: Standard size 123x71x55 mm vs Super compact 104x60x17 mm
  • Much thicker: 2.2" vs 0.7"

common strengths of the GX7 and Slice

  • Good image stabilization: Sensor shift vs Lens
  • Have touch screens
  • Each has a built-in flash
arrow Compare the Panasonic GX7 vs the Kodak Slice

Sony Alpha A6000

Sony Alpha A6000
4 years newer
$648 (body only)
$798 16-50mm lens

Significant advantages of the A6000 (vs the Slice)

  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 60fps vs 848 x 480 @ 30fps
  • Much higher true resolution: 24.3 MP vs 9.7 MP
  • Shoots RAW

Significant disadvantages of the A6000 (vs the Slice)

  • No image stabilization: None vs Lens
  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the A6000 and Slice

  • Each has a built-in flash
arrow Compare the Sony Alpha A6000 vs the Kodak Slice

compared toUltra compact competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Kodak Slice compared to ultra compact competitors include: it has a much larger screen (3.5" vs 2.7") and has a touch screen.

However, on average it has a much narrower aperture (f/4.8 vs f/2.6), records lower quality movies (848 x 480 @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps), has a significantly narrower wide angle lens (35 mm vs 26 mm), slightly lower maximum light sensitivity (3,200 ISO vs 12,800 ISO) and doesn't shoot as fast continuously (3 fps vs 10 fps).

Kodak EasyShare M590

Kodak EasyShare M590
7 months newer

Significant advantages of the M590 (vs the Slice)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the M590 (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the M590 and Slice

  • Each has a built-in flash
  • Good image stabilization: Lens vs Lens
  • Thin: 0.6" vs 0.7"
arrow Compare the EasyShare M590 vs the Slice

Sony Cyber-shot WX50

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX50
2 years newer
$159

Significant advantages of the WX50 (vs the Slice)

  • Much wider aperture: f/2.6 vs f/4.8
  • Much better wide angle: 25 mm vs 35 mm
  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 60fps vs 848 x 480 @ 30fps

Significant disadvantages of the WX50 (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the WX50 and Slice

  • Each has a built-in flash
  • Good image stabilization: Lens vs Lens
  • Thin: 0.7" vs 0.7"
arrow Compare the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX50 vs the Kodak Slice

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX30

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX30
3 years newer
$198 - $298

Significant advantages of the DSC-TX30 (vs the Slice)

  • Much wider aperture: f/3.5 vs f/4.8
  • Much better wide angle: 26 mm vs 35 mm
  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 60fps vs 848 x 480 @ 30fps

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-TX30 (vs the Slice)

  • None found

common strengths of the DSC-TX30 and Slice

  • Each has a built-in flash
  • Very large screens: 3.3" vs 3.5"
  • Good image stabilization: Lens vs Lens
arrow Compare the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX30 vs the Kodak Slice

Sony Cybershot DSC-WX30

Sony Cybershot DSC-WX30
1 year newer

Significant advantages of the DSC-WX30 (vs the Slice)

  • Much wider aperture: f/2.6 vs f/4.8
  • Much better wide angle: 25 mm vs 35 mm
  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs 848 x 480 @ 30fps

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-WX30 (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"

common strengths of the DSC-WX30 and Slice

  • Each has a built-in flash
  • Larger than average screens: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • Good image stabilization: Lens vs Lens
arrow Compare the Sony Cybershot DSC-WX30 vs the Kodak Slice

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX1

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX1
5 months older

Significant advantages of the DSC-TX1 (vs the Slice)

  • Much wider aperture: f/3.5 vs f/4.8
  • Much better macro capability: 1 cm vs 10 cm
  • Can create panoramas in-camera

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-TX1 (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"

common strengths of the DSC-TX1 and Slice

  • Each has a built-in flash
  • Larger than average screens: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • Good image stabilization: Lens vs Lens
arrow Compare the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX1 vs the Kodak Slice

compared toSuper zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Kodak Slice compared to super zoom competitors include: it has a much larger screen (3.5" vs 3.0"), is significantly smaller (super compact 104x60x17 mm vs prosumer size 118x85x97 mm), has a touch screen, is thinner (0.7" vs 3.6") and is significantly lighter (158 g vs 508 g).

However, on average it has a much narrower aperture (f/4.8 vs f/3.1), has significantly less zoom (5x vs 41.7x), records lower quality movies (848 x 480 @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps), has a much narrower wide angle lens (35 mm vs 23 mm) and doesn't have a screen which flips out.

Nikon Coolpix P520

Nikon Coolpix P520
3 years newer
$323 - $376

Significant advantages of the P520 (vs the Slice)

  • Much wider aperture: f/3.0 vs f/4.8
  • Much more zoom: 41.7x vs 5x
  • Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 35 mm

Significant disadvantages of the P520 (vs the Slice)

  • Much larger: Professional size 125x84x102 mm vs Super compact 104x60x17 mm
  • No touch screen
  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.2" vs 3.5"

common strengths of the P520 and Slice

  • Larger than average screens: 3.2" vs 3.5"
arrow Compare the Nikon Coolpix P520 vs the Kodak Slice

Kodak PixPro AZ521

Kodak PixPro AZ521
3 years newer

Significant advantages of the AZ521 (vs the Slice)

  • Much wider aperture: f/2.9 vs f/4.8
  • Much more zoom: 52x vs 5x
  • Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 35 mm

Significant disadvantages of the AZ521 (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • Much larger: Prosumer size 118x85x97 mm vs Super compact 104x60x17 mm
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the AZ521 and Slice

  • None found
arrow Compare the PixPro AZ521 vs the Slice

Nikon Coolpix L810

Nikon Coolpix L810
2 years newer
$198

Significant advantages of the L810 (vs the Slice)

  • Much wider aperture: f/3.1 vs f/4.8
  • Much better wide angle: 23 mm vs 35 mm
  • Much better macro capability: 1 cm vs 10 cm

Significant disadvantages of the L810 (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen
  • Significantly larger: Prosumer size 111x76x83 mm vs Super compact 104x60x17 mm

common strengths of the L810 and Slice

  • Fairly small: Prosumer size 111x76x83 mm vs Super compact 104x60x17 mm
  • Thin: 3.3" vs 0.7"
  • Light weight: 430 g vs 158 g
arrow Compare the Nikon Coolpix L810 vs the Kodak Slice

Kodak PixPro AZ251

Kodak PixPro AZ251
3 years newer
$129

Significant advantages of the AZ251 (vs the Slice)

  • Much wider aperture: f/3.7 vs f/4.8
  • Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 35 mm
  • Much better macro capability: 3 cm vs 10 cm

Significant disadvantages of the AZ251 (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen
  • Larger: Standard size 115x74x69 mm vs Super compact 104x60x17 mm

common strengths of the AZ251 and Slice

  • Fairly small: Standard size 115x74x69 mm vs Super compact 104x60x17 mm
  • Thin: 2.7" vs 0.7"
  • Light weight: 354 g vs 158 g
arrow Compare the PixPro AZ251 vs the Slice

Nikon Coolpix L830

Nikon Coolpix L830
4 years newer
$249 - $267

Significant advantages of the L830 (vs the Slice)

  • Much wider aperture: f/3.0 vs f/4.8
  • Much better wide angle: 22 mm vs 35 mm
  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs 848 x 480 @ 30fps

Significant disadvantages of the L830 (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen
  • Significantly larger: Prosumer size 111x75x91 mm vs Super compact 104x60x17 mm

common strengths of the L830 and Slice

  • Fairly small: Prosumer size 111x75x91 mm vs Super compact 104x60x17 mm
arrow Compare the Nikon Coolpix L830 vs the Kodak Slice

Kodak EashShare Z5120

Kodak EasyShare Z5120
2 years newer

Significant advantages of the Z5120 (vs the Slice)

  • Much wider aperture: f/3.1 vs f/4.8
  • Significantly better wide angle: 26 mm vs 35 mm
  • Can create panoramas in-camera

Significant disadvantages of the Z5120 (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen
  • Significantly larger: Prosumer size 116x78x76 mm vs Super compact 104x60x17 mm

common strengths of the Z5120 and Slice

  • Fairly small: Prosumer size 116x78x76 mm vs Super compact 104x60x17 mm
  • Thin: 3" vs 0.7"
arrow Compare the EashShare Z5120 vs the Slice

compared toTravel zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Kodak Slice compared to travel zoom competitors include: it has a much larger screen (3.5" vs 2.7") and has a touch screen.

However, on average it has a significantly narrower wide angle lens (35 mm vs 25 mm), has a much narrower aperture (f/4.8 vs f/3.3), doesn't have a built-in GPS, records lower quality movies (848 x 480 @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 24fps) and doesn't record high-speed movies (none vs 220 fps).

Panasonic Lumix ZS25

Panasonic Lumix ZS25
3 years newer
$235 - $295

Significant advantages of the ZS25 (vs the Slice)

  • Much wider aperture: f/3.3 vs f/4.8
  • Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 35 mm
  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 60fps vs 848 x 480 @ 30fps

Significant disadvantages of the ZS25 (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the ZS25 and Slice

  • None found
arrow Compare the Panasonic Lumix ZS25 vs the Kodak Slice

Canon PowerShot SX260 HS

Canon PowerShot SX260 HS
2 years newer
$200 - $300

Significant advantages of the SX260 HS (vs the Slice)

  • Has a GPS
  • Much wider aperture: f/3.5 vs f/4.8
  • Much better wide angle: 25 mm vs 35 mm

Significant disadvantages of the SX260 HS (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the SX260 HS and Slice

  • None found
arrow Compare the Canon PowerShot SX260 HS vs the Kodak Slice

Nikon Coolpix S9500

Nikon Coolpix S9500
3 years newer
$175

Significant advantages of the S9500 (vs the Slice)

  • Much wider aperture: f/3.4 vs f/4.8
  • Has a GPS
  • Much better wide angle: 25 mm vs 35 mm

Significant disadvantages of the S9500 (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the S9500 and Slice

  • None found
arrow Compare the Nikon Coolpix S9500 vs the Kodak Slice

Fujifilm FinePix T400

Fujifilm FinePix T400
2 years newer
$183

Significant advantages of the T400 (vs the Slice)

  • Much wider aperture: f/3.4 vs f/4.8
  • Significantly better wide angle: 28 mm vs 35 mm
  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs 848 x 480 @ 30fps

Significant disadvantages of the T400 (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the T400 and Slice

  • None found
arrow Compare the Fujifilm FinePix T400 vs the Kodak Slice

Canon PowerShot SX150 IS

Canon PowerShot SX150 IS
1 year newer
$99 - $250

Significant advantages of the SX150 IS (vs the Slice)

  • Much wider aperture: f/3.4 vs f/4.8
  • Significantly better wide angle: 28 mm vs 35 mm
  • Much better macro capability: 1 cm vs 10 cm

Significant disadvantages of the SX150 IS (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the SX150 IS and Slice

  • None found
arrow Compare the Canon PowerShot SX150 IS vs the Kodak Slice

Canon ELPH 310 HS

Canon ELPH 310 HS
1 year newer
$179

Significant advantages of the 310 HS (vs the Slice)

  • Much wider aperture: f/3.0 vs f/4.8
  • Significantly better wide angle: 28 mm vs 35 mm
  • Supports 24p

Significant disadvantages of the 310 HS (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the 310 HS and Slice

  • None found
arrow Compare the Canon ELPH 310 HS vs the Kodak Slice

compared toEntry-level DSLR competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Kodak Slice compared to entry-level DSLR competitors include: it has a much larger screen (3.5" vs 2.5"), has image stabilization (lens vs none), has a touch screen, is much smaller (super compact 104x60x17 mm vs professional size 133x100x79 mm) and is thinner (0.7" vs 3.1").

However, on average it records lower quality movies (848 x 480 @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps), takes significantly lower resolution photos (9.7 MP vs 17.9 MP), doesn't record movies in 24p, doesn't have a screen which flips out and has a much smaller sensor (1/2.3" 6.2x4.6mm vs APS-C 23.7x15.6mm).

Canon Rebel T5i

Canon Rebel T5i
3 years newer
$599 (body only)
$749 - $1,148 18-55mm lens

Significant advantages of the T5i (vs the Slice)

  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs 848 x 480 @ 30fps
  • Much larger sensor: APS-C 22.3x14.9mm vs 1/2.3" 6.2x4.6mm
  • Has a viewfinder: Pentamirror vs None

Significant disadvantages of the T5i (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • Much larger: Professional size 133x100x79 mm vs Super compact 104x60x17 mm
  • No image stabilization: None vs Lens

common strengths of the T5i and Slice

  • Have touch screens
arrow Compare the Canon Rebel T5i vs the Kodak Slice

Nikon D40X

Nikon D40X
2 years older

Significant advantages of the D40X (vs the Slice)

  • Much larger sensor: APS-C 23.7x15.6mm vs 1/2.3" 6.2x4.6mm
  • Has a viewfinder: Pentamirror vs None
  • Shoots RAW

Significant disadvantages of the D40X (vs the Slice)

  • Does not take movies: None vs 848 x 480 @ 30fps
  • Much smaller screen: 2.5" vs 3.5"
  • Much larger: Prosumer size 124x94x64 mm vs Super compact 104x60x17 mm

common strengths of the D40X and Slice

  • Very small: Prosumer size 124x94x64 mm vs Super compact 104x60x17 mm
  • Very thin: 2.5" vs 0.7"
  • Light weight: 522 g vs 158 g
arrow Compare the Nikon D40X vs the Kodak Slice

Canon Rebel T3i

Canon Rebel T3i
1 year newer
$499 - $749 (body only)
$550 - $600 18-55mm lens

Significant advantages of the T3i (vs the Slice)

  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs 848 x 480 @ 30fps
  • Much larger sensor: APS-C 22.3x14.9mm vs 1/2.3" 6.2x4.6mm
  • Has a viewfinder: Pentamirror vs None

Significant disadvantages of the T3i (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • Much larger: Professional size 133x99x79 mm vs Super compact 104x60x17 mm
  • No image stabilization: None vs Lens

common strengths of the T3i and Slice

  • None found
arrow Compare the Canon Rebel T3i vs the Kodak Slice