As well as being compared against other compacts, the Kodak Slice is also often compared to travel zooms, ultra compacts, super zooms and entry-level DSLRs. The Kodak Slice's top rivals come from Panasonic (such as the Lumix DMC-TZ3 and the Lumix DMC-FH25) and Nikon (such as the Coolpix S80 and the Coolpix P310)
Generally, some of the advantages of the Kodak Slice compared to other compact competitors include: it has a significantly larger screen (3.5" vs 2.7"), has better image stabilization (lens vs digital), has a touch screen, is thinner (0.7" vs 0.8") and is slightly less expensive ($104.99 vs $219.00).
However, on average it has a much narrower aperture (f/4.8 vs f/3.2), records lower quality movies (848 x 480 @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 24fps), has a significantly narrower wide angle lens (35 mm vs 28 mm), doesn't record movies in 24p and doesn't have an OLED screen (LCD vs OLED).
Generally, some of the advantages of the Kodak Slice compared to travel zoom competitors include: it has a significantly larger screen (3.5" vs 2.7"), is slightly smaller (super compact 104x60x17 mm vs compact 104x58x28 mm), has a touch screen, is thinner (0.7" vs 1.1") and is slightly lighter (158 g vs 193 g).
However, on average it has slightly less zoom (5x vs 20x), has a significantly narrower wide angle lens (35 mm vs 24 mm), has a much narrower aperture (f/4.8 vs f/3.3), records lower quality movies (848 x 480 @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 24fps) and doesn't record high-speed movies (none vs 220 fps).
Generally, some of the advantages of the Kodak Slice compared to ultra compact competitors include: it has a much larger screen (3.5" vs 2.7"), has a touch screen, is slightly less expensive ($104.99 vs $288.02) and has a faster max shutter speed (1/2000 of a second vs 1/1600 of a second).
However, on average it has a much narrower aperture (f/4.8 vs f/2.8), records lower quality movies (848 x 480 @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps), has a significantly narrower wide angle lens (35 mm vs 26 mm), slightly lower maximum light sensitivity (3,200 ISO vs 6,400 ISO) and doesn't shoot as fast continuously (3 fps vs 10 fps).
Generally, some of the advantages of the Kodak Slice compared to super zoom competitors include: it has a significantly larger screen (3.5" vs 3.0"), is significantly smaller (super compact 104x60x17 mm vs professional size 124x86x93 mm), has a touch screen, is thinner (0.7" vs 3.6") and is significantly lighter (158 g vs 589 g).
However, on average it has a much narrower aperture (f/4.8 vs f/2.8), has slightly less zoom (5x vs 34.8x), records lower quality movies (848 x 480 @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps), has a much narrower wide angle lens (35 mm vs 23 mm) and doesn't record high-speed movies (none vs 240 fps).
Generally, some of the advantages of the Kodak Slice compared to entry-level DSLR competitors include: it has a much larger screen (3.5" vs 3.0"), has image stabilization (lens vs none), has a touch screen, is much smaller (super compact 104x60x17 mm vs professional size 133x99x79 mm) and is significantly less expensive ($104.99 vs $599.00).
However, on average it records lower quality movies (848 x 480 @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps), takes much lower resolution photos (9.7 MP vs 17.9 MP), doesn't record movies in 24p, doesn't shoot as fast continuously (3 fps vs 5 fps) and doesn't have a screen which flips out.
