As well as being compared against other compacts, the Kodak Slice is also often compared to ultra compacts, travel zooms, pro digicams, super zooms, mirrorless and entry-level DSLRs. The Kodak Slice's top rivals come from Kodak (such as the EasyShare Z915 and the EasyShare M590) and Panasonic (such as the Lumix ZS25 and the Lumix DMC-TS10)

compared toCompact competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Kodak Slice compared to other compact competitors include: it has a significantly larger screen (3.5" vs 2.7"), has a touch screen, is thinner (0.7" vs 0.9") and has a faster max shutter speed (1/2000 of a second vs 1/1600 of a second).

However, on average it has a much narrower aperture (f/4.8 vs f/2.8), records lower quality movies (848 x 480 @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 24fps), has a much narrower wide angle lens (35 mm vs 28 mm), doesn't record high-speed movies (none vs 240 fps) and doesn't record movies in 24p.

Fujifilm FinePix Z90

Fujifilm FinePix Z90
1 year newer
$269

Significant advantages of the Z90 (vs the Slice)

  • Much better wide angle: 28 mm vs 35 mm
  • Significantly wider aperture: f/3.9 vs f/4.8

Significant disadvantages of the Z90 (vs the Slice)

  • Worse image stabilization: Digital vs Lens
  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"

common strengths of the Z90 and Slice

  • Fairly small: Super compact 95x56x20 mm vs Super compact 104x60x17 mm
  • Have touch screens
  • Thin: 0.8" vs 0.7"

Nikon Coolpix S80

Nikon Coolpix S80
8 months newer
$120

Significant advantages of the S80 (vs the Slice)

  • Much wider aperture: f/3.6 vs f/4.8
  • Has an OLED screen: OLED vs LCD
  • Supports 24p

Significant disadvantages of the S80 (vs the Slice)

  • Slower max shutter speed: 1/1500 of a second vs 1/2000 of a second

common strengths of the S80 and Slice

  • Very large screens: 3.5" vs 3.5"
  • Fairly small: Super compact 99x63x17 mm vs Super compact 104x60x17 mm
  • Good image stabilization: Lens vs Lens

Canon ELPH 100 HS

Canon ELPH 100 HS
1 year newer
$129

Significant advantages of the 100 HS (vs the Slice)

  • Much wider aperture: f/2.8 vs f/4.8
  • Much better wide angle: 28 mm vs 35 mm
  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 24fps vs 848 x 480 @ 30fps

Significant disadvantages of the 100 HS (vs the Slice)

  • No touch screen
  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • Slower max shutter speed: 1/1500 of a second vs 1/2000 of a second

common strengths of the 100 HS and Slice

  • Fairly small: Super compact 93x55x19 mm vs Super compact 104x60x17 mm
  • Good image stabilization: Lens vs Lens
  • Thin: 0.8" vs 0.7"

Panasonic Lumix DMC-TS10

Panasonic Lumix DMC-TS10
6 months newer
$226

Significant advantages of the DMC-TS10 (vs the Slice)

  • Much wider aperture: f/3.5 vs f/4.8
  • Significantly better macro capability: 5 cm vs 10 cm
  • Waterproof

Significant disadvantages of the DMC-TS10 (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the DMC-TS10 and Slice

  • Fairly small: Compact 100x64x22 mm vs Super compact 104x60x17 mm
  • Good image stabilization: Lens vs Lens
  • Thin: 0.9" vs 0.7"

Nikon Coolpix P340

Nikon Coolpix P340
4 years newer
$330

Significant advantages of the P340 (vs the Slice)

  • Much wider aperture: f/1.8 vs f/4.8
  • Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 35 mm
  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs 848 x 480 @ 30fps

Significant disadvantages of the P340 (vs the Slice)

  • No touch screen
  • Significantly larger: Compact 103x58x32 mm vs Super compact 104x60x17 mm
  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"

common strengths of the P340 and Slice

  • Good image stabilization: Lens vs Lens

Canon ELPH 300 HS

Canon ELPH 300 HS
1 year newer
$220

Significant advantages of the 300 HS (vs the Slice)

  • Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 35 mm
  • Much wider aperture: f/2.7 vs f/4.8
  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 24fps vs 848 x 480 @ 30fps

Significant disadvantages of the 300 HS (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the 300 HS and Slice

  • Fairly small: Super compact 92x55x19 mm vs Super compact 104x60x17 mm
  • Good image stabilization: Lens vs Lens
  • Thin: 0.8" vs 0.7"

compared toUltra compact competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Kodak Slice compared to ultra compact competitors include: it has a significantly larger screen (3.5" vs 2.7"), has a touch screen and has a faster max shutter speed (1/2000 of a second vs 1/1200 of a second).

However, on average it has a much narrower aperture (f/4.8 vs f/2.6), records lower quality movies (848 x 480 @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 60fps), has a much narrower wide angle lens (35 mm vs 26 mm), significantly lower maximum light sensitivity (3,200 ISO vs 12,800 ISO) and doesn't shoot as fast continuously (3 fps vs 10 fps).

Kodak EasyShare M590

Kodak EasyShare M590
7 months newer
$119

Significant advantages of the M590 (vs the Slice)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the M590 (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen
  • Much slower max shutter speed: 1/1200 of a second vs 1/2000 of a second

common strengths of the M590 and Slice

  • Built-in flashes
  • Very good image stabilization: Lens vs Lens
  • Very thin: 0.6" vs 0.7"

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX200V

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX200V
2 years newer
$290

Significant advantages of the DSC-TX200V (vs the Slice)

  • Much better wide angle: 26 mm vs 35 mm
  • Much wider aperture: f/3.5 vs f/4.8
  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 60fps vs 848 x 480 @ 30fps

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-TX200V (vs the Slice)

  • None found

common strengths of the DSC-TX200V and Slice

  • Built-in flashes
  • Very large screens: 3.3" vs 3.5"
  • Very good image stabilization: Lens vs Lens

Sony Cyber-shot WX50

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX50
2 years newer
$194

Significant advantages of the WX50 (vs the Slice)

  • Much better wide angle: 25 mm vs 35 mm
  • Much wider aperture: f/2.6 vs f/4.8
  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 60fps vs 848 x 480 @ 30fps

Significant disadvantages of the WX50 (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the WX50 and Slice

  • Built-in flashes
  • Very good image stabilization: Lens vs Lens
  • Very thin: 0.7" vs 0.7"

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX30

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX30
3 years newer
$198 - $229

Significant advantages of the DSC-TX30 (vs the Slice)

  • Much better wide angle: 26 mm vs 35 mm
  • Much wider aperture: f/3.5 vs f/4.8
  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 60fps vs 848 x 480 @ 30fps

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-TX30 (vs the Slice)

  • None found

common strengths of the DSC-TX30 and Slice

  • Built-in flashes
  • Very large screens: 3.3" vs 3.5"
  • Very good image stabilization: Lens vs Lens

compared toTravel zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Kodak Slice compared to travel zoom competitors include: it has a much larger screen (3.5" vs 2.7"), is significantly smaller (super compact 104x60x17 mm vs compact 90x64x39 mm), has a touch screen, is thinner (0.7" vs 1.4") and is slightly less expensive ($199.00 vs $386.49).

However, on average it has significantly less zoom (5x vs 20x), has a much narrower wide angle lens (35 mm vs 24 mm), has a much narrower aperture (f/4.8 vs f/3.3), doesn't have a built-in GPS and records lower quality movies (848 x 480 @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 50fps).

Kodak EasyShare Z915

Kodak EasyShare Z915
1 year older
$450

Significant advantages of the Z915 (vs the Slice)

  • Much wider aperture: f/3.5 vs f/4.8

Significant disadvantages of the Z915 (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 2.5" vs 3.5"
  • Much larger: Compact 90x64x39 mm vs Super compact 104x60x17 mm
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the Z915 and Slice

  • None found

Panasonic Lumix ZS25

Panasonic Lumix ZS25
3 years newer
$239

Significant advantages of the ZS25 (vs the Slice)

  • Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 35 mm
  • Much wider aperture: f/3.3 vs f/4.8
  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 60fps vs 848 x 480 @ 30fps

Significant disadvantages of the ZS25 (vs the Slice)

  • No touch screen
  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • Significantly larger: Compact 104x58x28 mm vs Super compact 104x60x17 mm

common strengths of the ZS25 and Slice

  • None found

Canon PowerShot ELPH 140 IS

Canon PowerShot ELPH 140 IS
4 years newer
$179

Significant advantages of the ELPH 140 IS (vs the Slice)

  • Much better wide angle: 28 mm vs 35 mm
  • Much wider aperture: f/3.2 vs f/4.8
  • Much better macro capability: 1 cm vs 10 cm

Significant disadvantages of the ELPH 140 IS (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the ELPH 140 IS and Slice

  • Very small: Super compact 95x54x22 mm vs Super compact 104x60x17 mm
  • Thin: 0.9" vs 0.7"
  • Light weight: 130 g vs 158 g

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH25

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH25
1 year newer
$300

Significant advantages of the DMC-FH25 (vs the Slice)

  • Much better wide angle: 28 mm vs 35 mm
  • Much wider aperture: f/3.3 vs f/4.8
  • Significantly better macro capability: 5 cm vs 10 cm

Significant disadvantages of the DMC-FH25 (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen
  • Larger: Compact 99x56x27 mm vs Super compact 104x60x17 mm

common strengths of the DMC-FH25 and Slice

  • Fairly small: Compact 99x56x27 mm vs Super compact 104x60x17 mm
  • Light weight: 135 g vs 158 g

Panasonic Lumix ZS30

Panasonic Lumix ZS30
3 years newer
$386

Significant advantages of the ZS30 (vs the Slice)

  • Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 35 mm
  • Much wider aperture: f/3.3 vs f/4.8
  • Has a GPS

Significant disadvantages of the ZS30 (vs the Slice)

  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • Significantly larger: Compact 105x59x28 mm vs Super compact 104x60x17 mm
  • Significantly thicker: 1.1" vs 0.7"

common strengths of the ZS30 and Slice

  • Have touch screens

Panasonic Lumix DMC-TZ60

Panasonic Lumix DMC-TZ60
4 years newer
$281

Significant advantages of the DMC-TZ60 (vs the Slice)

  • Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 35 mm
  • Much more zoom: 30x vs 5x
  • Much wider aperture: f/3.3 vs f/4.8

Significant disadvantages of the DMC-TZ60 (vs the Slice)

  • Much larger: Compact 110x64x34 mm vs Super compact 104x60x17 mm
  • No touch screen
  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"

common strengths of the DMC-TZ60 and Slice

  • None found

compared toPro digicam competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Kodak Slice compared to pro digicam competitors include: it has a much larger screen (3.5" vs 2.5"), is significantly smaller (super compact 104x60x17 mm vs professional size 116x97x91 mm), has image stabilization (lens vs none), takes slightly higher resolution photos (9.7 MP vs 8 MP) and slightly higher maximum light sensitivity (3,200 ISO vs 400 ISO).

However, on average it has a marginally smaller sensor (1/2.3" 6.2x4.6mm vs 1/1.8" 7.2x5.3mm), doesn't shoot RAW, has a much narrower aperture (f/4.8 vs f/2.8), has a much narrower wide angle lens (35 mm vs 24 mm) and much worse macro focusing (10 cm vs 5 cm).

Kodak EasyShare P880

Placeholder
4 years older

Significant advantages of the P880 (vs the Slice)

  • Much wider aperture: f/2.8 vs f/4.8
  • Shoots RAW
  • Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 35 mm

Significant disadvantages of the P880 (vs the Slice)

  • No image stabilization: None vs Lens
  • Much smaller screen: 2.5" vs 3.5"
  • Significantly larger: Professional size 116x97x91 mm vs Super compact 104x60x17 mm

common strengths of the P880 and Slice

  • None found

compared toSuper zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Kodak Slice compared to super zoom competitors include: it has a significantly larger screen (3.5" vs 3.0"), is significantly smaller (super compact 104x60x17 mm vs professional size 124x86x93 mm), has a touch screen, is thinner (0.7" vs 3.6") and is significantly lighter (158 g vs 589 g).

However, on average it has a much narrower aperture (f/4.8 vs f/2.8), has slightly less zoom (5x vs 34.8x), records lower quality movies (848 x 480 @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps), has a much narrower wide angle lens (35 mm vs 23 mm) and doesn't record high-speed movies (none vs 240 fps).

Kodak EashShare Z5120

Kodak EasyShare Z5120
2 years newer

Significant advantages of the Z5120 (vs the Slice)

  • Much wider aperture: f/3.1 vs f/4.8
  • Much better wide angle: 26 mm vs 35 mm
  • Can create panoramas in-camera

Significant disadvantages of the Z5120 (vs the Slice)

  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen
  • Significantly larger: Prosumer size 116x78x76 mm vs Super compact 104x60x17 mm

common strengths of the Z5120 and Slice

  • Fairly small: Prosumer size 116x78x76 mm vs Super compact 104x60x17 mm
  • Thin: 3" vs 0.7"

Kodak Easyshare Z990 MAX

Kodak Easyshare Z990 MAX
1 year newer

Significant advantages of the Z990 MAX (vs the Slice)

  • Much wider aperture: f/2.8 vs f/4.8
  • Significantly better wide angle: 28 mm vs 35 mm
  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs 848 x 480 @ 30fps

Significant disadvantages of the Z990 MAX (vs the Slice)

  • Significantly larger: Professional size 124x86x93 mm vs Super compact 104x60x17 mm
  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the Z990 MAX and Slice

  • None found

Nikon Coolpix L830

Nikon Coolpix L830
4 years newer
$159 - $207

Significant advantages of the L830 (vs the Slice)

  • Much wider aperture: f/3.0 vs f/4.8
  • Much better wide angle: 22 mm vs 35 mm
  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs 848 x 480 @ 30fps

Significant disadvantages of the L830 (vs the Slice)

  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen
  • Significantly larger: Prosumer size 111x75x91 mm vs Super compact 104x60x17 mm

common strengths of the L830 and Slice

  • Fairly small: Prosumer size 111x75x91 mm vs Super compact 104x60x17 mm
  • Inexpensive: $159.00 vs $199.00

Nikon Coolpix L820

Nikon Coolpix L820
3 years newer
$150

Significant advantages of the L820 (vs the Slice)

  • Much wider aperture: f/3.0 vs f/4.8
  • Much better wide angle: 23 mm vs 35 mm
  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs 848 x 480 @ 30fps

Significant disadvantages of the L820 (vs the Slice)

  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen
  • Significantly larger: Prosumer size 111x76x85 mm vs Super compact 104x60x17 mm

common strengths of the L820 and Slice

  • Fairly small: Prosumer size 111x76x85 mm vs Super compact 104x60x17 mm
  • Light weight: 470 g vs 158 g
  • Inexpensive: $149.95 vs $199.00

compared toMirrorless interchangeable-lens competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Kodak Slice compared to mirrorless interchangeable-lens competitors include: it has a significantly larger screen (3.5" vs 3.0"), has a touch screen, is slightly smaller (super compact 104x60x17 mm vs mid size 120x67x45 mm), is thinner (0.7" vs 1.8") and is slightly lighter (158 g vs 285 g).

However, on average it records lower quality movies (848 x 480 @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 60fps), doesn't have a viewfinder (none vs digital), takes much lower resolution photos (9.7 MP vs 24 MP), doesn't record movies in 24p and doesn't shoot as fast continuously (3 fps vs 11 fps).

Sony Alpha A6000

Sony Alpha A6000
4 years newer
$548 (body only)
$698 16-50mm lens

Significant advantages of the A6000 (vs the Slice)

  • Has a viewfinder: Digital vs None
  • Much higher true resolution: 24 MP vs 9.7 MP
  • Has in-camera HDR

Significant disadvantages of the A6000 (vs the Slice)

  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen
  • Significantly thicker: 1.8" vs 0.7"

common strengths of the A6000 and Slice

  • Very good image stabilization: Lens vs Lens
  • Each has a built-in flash

compared toEntry-level DSLR competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Kodak Slice compared to entry-level DSLR competitors include: it has a much larger screen (3.5" vs 3.0"), has image stabilization (lens vs none), has a touch screen, is much smaller (super compact 104x60x17 mm vs professional size 133x99x78 mm) and is significantly less expensive ($199.00 vs $569.99).

However, on average it records lower quality movies (848 x 480 @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 60fps), takes much lower resolution photos (9.7 MP vs 24 MP), doesn't record movies in 24p, doesn't shoot as fast continuously (3 fps vs 5 fps) and doesn't have a screen which flips out.

Canon Rebel T5i

Canon Rebel T5i
3 years newer
$649 - $650 (body only)
$649 - $650 18-55mm lens

Significant advantages of the T5i (vs the Slice)

  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs 848 x 480 @ 30fps
  • Has a viewfinder: Pentamirror vs None
  • Supports 24p

Significant disadvantages of the T5i (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • Much larger: Professional size 133x100x79 mm vs Super compact 104x60x17 mm
  • No image stabilization: None vs Lens

common strengths of the T5i and Slice

  • Have touch screens

Canon Rebel T4i

Canon Rebel T4i
2 years newer
$525 (body only)
$630 18-135mm lens

Significant advantages of the T4i (vs the Slice)

  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs 848 x 480 @ 30fps
  • Has a viewfinder: Pentamirror vs None
  • Supports 24p

Significant disadvantages of the T4i (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • Much larger: Professional size 133x99x78 mm vs Super compact 104x60x17 mm
  • No image stabilization: None vs Lens

common strengths of the T4i and Slice

  • Have touch screens

Nikon D5300

Nikon D5300
3 years newer
$647 (body only)
$570 - $747 18-55mm lens

Significant advantages of the D5300 (vs the Slice)

  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 60fps vs 848 x 480 @ 30fps
  • Has a viewfinder: Pentamirror vs None
  • Supports 24p

Significant disadvantages of the D5300 (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 3.2" vs 3.5"
  • No image stabilization: None vs Lens
  • Much larger: Prosumer size 124x99x76 mm vs Super compact 104x60x17 mm

common strengths of the D5300 and Slice

  • Larger than average screens: 3.2" vs 3.5"
  • Light weight: 480 g vs 158 g

Canon Rebel T3i

Canon Rebel T3i
1 year newer
$629 (body only)
$549 - $629 18-55mm lens

Significant advantages of the T3i (vs the Slice)

  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs 848 x 480 @ 30fps
  • Has a viewfinder: Pentamirror vs None
  • Supports 24p

Significant disadvantages of the T3i (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • Much larger: Professional size 133x99x79 mm vs Super compact 104x60x17 mm
  • No image stabilization: None vs Lens

common strengths of the T3i and Slice

  • None found