As well as being compared against other compacts, the Kodak Slice is also often compared to boutiques, ultra compacts, entry-level DSLRs and travel zooms. The Kodak Slice's top rivals come from Sony (such as the Cyber-shot DSC-R1 and the Cyber-shot DSC-TX9) and Canon (such as the Rebel T4i and the PowerShot SD40)

compared toCompact competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Kodak Slice compared to other compact competitors include: it has a much larger screen (3.5" vs 2.7"), has better image stabilization (lens vs none) and has a touch screen.

However, on average it has a much narrower aperture (f/4.8 vs f/2.8), records lower quality movies (848 x 480 @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 24fps), has a significantly narrower wide angle lens (35 mm vs 25 mm), doesn't record high-speed movies (none vs 240 fps) and doesn't record movies in 24p.

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX9

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX9
similar age
$178

Significant advantages of the DSC-TX9 (vs the Slice)

  • Much wider aperture: f/3.5 vs f/4.8
  • Much better wide angle: 25 mm vs 35 mm
  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 25fps vs 848 x 480 @ 30fps

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-TX9 (vs the Slice)

  • None found

common strengths of the DSC-TX9 and Slice

  • Very large screens: 3.5" vs 3.5"
  • Fairly small: Super compact 98x60x18 mm vs Super compact 104x60x17 mm
  • Good image stabilization: Lens vs Lens
arrow Compare the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX9 vs the Kodak Slice

Canon PowerShot SD40

Canon PowerShot SD40
3 years older
$360

Significant advantages of the SD40 (vs the Slice)

  • Much wider aperture: f/3.2 vs f/4.8

Significant disadvantages of the SD40 (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 1.8" vs 3.5"
  • No image stabilization: None vs Lens
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the SD40 and Slice

  • Fairly small: Super compact 96x45x24 mm vs Super compact 104x60x17 mm
  • Thin: 0.9" vs 0.7"
arrow Compare the Canon PowerShot SD40 vs the Kodak Slice

Canon PowerShot SD1300 IS

Canon PowerShot SD1300 IS
similar age
$180

Significant advantages of the SD1300 IS (vs the Slice)

  • Much wider aperture: f/2.8 vs f/4.8
  • Significantly better wide angle: 28 mm vs 35 mm
  • Much better macro capability: 3 cm vs 10 cm

Significant disadvantages of the SD1300 IS (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the SD1300 IS and Slice

  • Fairly small: Super compact 91x56x22 mm vs Super compact 104x60x17 mm
  • Good image stabilization: Lens vs Lens
  • Thin: 0.9" vs 0.7"
arrow Compare the Canon PowerShot SD1300 IS vs the Kodak Slice

Canon PowerShot ELPH 110 HS

Canon PowerShot ELPH 110 HS
2 years newer
$185

Significant advantages of the ELPH 110 HS (vs the Slice)

  • Much wider aperture: f/2.7 vs f/4.8
  • Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 35 mm
  • Supports 24p

Significant disadvantages of the ELPH 110 HS (vs the Slice)

  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the ELPH 110 HS and Slice

  • Fairly small: Super compact 93x57x20 mm vs Super compact 104x60x17 mm
  • Good image stabilization: Lens vs Lens
  • Thin: 0.8" vs 0.7"
arrow Compare the Canon PowerShot ELPH 110 HS vs the Kodak Slice

Canon ELPH 320 HS

Canon PowerShot ELPH 320 HS
2 years newer
$159 - $250

Significant advantages of the 320 HS (vs the Slice)

  • Much wider aperture: f/2.7 vs f/4.8
  • Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 35 mm
  • Supports 24p

Significant disadvantages of the 320 HS (vs the Slice)

  • None found

common strengths of the 320 HS and Slice

  • Larger than average screens: 3.2" vs 3.5"
  • Fairly small: Super compact 94x57x21 mm vs Super compact 104x60x17 mm
  • Good image stabilization: Lens vs Lens
arrow Compare the Canon PowerShot ELPH 320 HS vs the Kodak Slice

Canon ELPH 300 HS

Canon ELPH 300 HS
1 year newer
$180 - $220

Significant advantages of the 300 HS (vs the Slice)

  • Much wider aperture: f/2.7 vs f/4.8
  • Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 35 mm
  • Supports 24p

Significant disadvantages of the 300 HS (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the 300 HS and Slice

  • Fairly small: Super compact 92x55x19 mm vs Super compact 104x60x17 mm
  • Good image stabilization: Lens vs Lens
  • Thin: 0.8" vs 0.7"
arrow Compare the Canon ELPH 300 HS vs the Kodak Slice

compared toBoutique competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Kodak Slice compared to boutique competitors include: it has a much larger screen (3.5" vs 2.0"), is much smaller (super compact 104x60x17 mm vs large 139x168x97 mm), has image stabilization (lens vs none), has a touch screen and is newer (january, 2010 vs september, 2005).

However, on average it has a much narrower aperture (f/4.8 vs f/2.8), has a significantly narrower wide angle lens (35 mm vs 24 mm), has a significantly smaller sensor (1/2.3" 6.2x4.6mm vs sigma x3 21.5x14.4mm), doesn't shoot RAW and has a CCD-family sensor (CCD vs CMOS).

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-R1

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-R1
4 years older

Significant advantages of the DSC-R1 (vs the Slice)

  • Much wider aperture: f/2.8 vs f/4.8
  • Significantly better wide angle: 24 mm vs 35 mm
  • Shoots RAW

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-R1 (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 2.0" vs 3.5"
  • Much larger: Large 139x168x97 mm vs Super compact 104x60x17 mm
  • Much heavier: 995 g vs 158 g

common strengths of the DSC-R1 and Slice

  • Great zoom: 5x vs 5x
arrow Compare the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-R1 vs the Kodak Slice

compared toUltra compact competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Kodak Slice compared to ultra compact competitors include: it has a significantly larger screen (3.5" vs 2.7") and has a touch screen.

However, on average it has a much narrower aperture (f/4.8 vs f/3.2), records lower quality movies (848 x 480 @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 24fps), has a significantly narrower wide angle lens (35 mm vs 28 mm), doesn't record movies in 24p and has a CCD-family sensor (CCD vs CMOS).

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX1

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX1
5 months older
$200

Significant advantages of the DSC-TX1 (vs the Slice)

  • Much wider aperture: f/3.5 vs f/4.8
  • Much better macro capability: 1 cm vs 10 cm
  • Has a CMOS-family sensor: CMOS vs CCD

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-TX1 (vs the Slice)

  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"

common strengths of the DSC-TX1 and Slice

  • Built-in flashes
  • Larger than average screens: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • Very good image stabilization: Lens vs Lens
arrow Compare the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX1 vs the Kodak Slice

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX20

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX20
2 years newer
$210

Significant advantages of the DSC-TX20 (vs the Slice)

  • Much wider aperture: f/3.5 vs f/4.8
  • Much better wide angle: 25 mm vs 35 mm
  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 60fps vs 848 x 480 @ 30fps

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-TX20 (vs the Slice)

  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"

common strengths of the DSC-TX20 and Slice

  • Built-in flashes
  • Larger than average screens: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • Very good image stabilization: Lens vs Lens
arrow Compare the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX20 vs the Kodak Slice

Kodak EasyShare M590

Kodak EasyShare M590
7 months newer
$128

Significant advantages of the M590 (vs the Slice)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the M590 (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the M590 and Slice

  • Built-in flashes
  • Very good image stabilization: Lens vs Lens
  • Very thin: 0.6" vs 0.7"
arrow Compare the EasyShare M590 vs the Slice

Nikon Coolpix S3100

Nikon Coolpix S3100
1 year newer
$119

Significant advantages of the S3100 (vs the Slice)

  • Much wider aperture: f/3.2 vs f/4.8
  • Much better wide angle: 26 mm vs 35 mm
  • Can create panoramas in-camera

Significant disadvantages of the S3100 (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the S3100 and Slice

  • Built-in flashes
  • Good image stabilization: Sensor shift vs Lens
  • Thin: 0.7" vs 0.7"
arrow Compare the Nikon Coolpix S3100 vs the Kodak Slice

Canon PowerShot ELPH 520 HS

Canon ELPH 520 HS
2 years newer
$119 - $376

Significant advantages of the ELPH 520 HS (vs the Slice)

  • Much wider aperture: f/3.4 vs f/4.8
  • Significantly better wide angle: 28 mm vs 35 mm
  • Supports 24p

Significant disadvantages of the ELPH 520 HS (vs the Slice)

  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the ELPH 520 HS and Slice

  • Built-in flashes
  • Larger than average screens: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • Very good image stabilization: Lens vs Lens
arrow Compare the Canon ELPH 520 HS vs the Kodak Slice

Sony Cyber-shot WX50

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX50
2 years newer
$199

Significant advantages of the WX50 (vs the Slice)

  • Much wider aperture: f/2.6 vs f/4.8
  • Much better wide angle: 25 mm vs 35 mm
  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 60fps vs 848 x 480 @ 30fps

Significant disadvantages of the WX50 (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the WX50 and Slice

  • Built-in flashes
  • Very good image stabilization: Lens vs Lens
  • Thin: 0.7" vs 0.7"
arrow Compare the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX50 vs the Kodak Slice

compared toEntry-level DSLR competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Kodak Slice compared to entry-level DSLR competitors include: it has a much larger screen (3.5" vs 3.0"), has image stabilization (lens vs none), has a touch screen, is much smaller (super compact 104x60x17 mm vs professional size 133x99x79 mm) and is much less expensive ($104.95 vs $599.00).

However, on average it records lower quality movies (848 x 480 @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps), takes much lower resolution photos (9.7 MP vs 17.9 MP), doesn't record movies in 24p, doesn't shoot as fast continuously (3 fps vs 5 fps) and doesn't have a screen which flips out.

Canon Rebel T4i

Canon Rebel T4i
2 years newer
$669 - $700 (body only)
$845 - $970 18-135mm lens

Significant advantages of the T4i (vs the Slice)

  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs 848 x 480 @ 30fps
  • Much larger sensor: APS-C 22.3x14.9mm vs 1/2.3" 6.2x4.6mm
  • Has a viewfinder: Pentamirror vs None

Significant disadvantages of the T4i (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • Much larger: Professional size 133x99x78 mm vs Super compact 104x60x17 mm
  • No image stabilization: None vs Lens

common strengths of the T4i and Slice

  • Have touch screens
arrow Compare the Canon Rebel T4i vs the Kodak Slice

Canon Rebel T3i

Canon Rebel T3i
1 year newer
$499 - $550 (body only)
$549 - $575 18-55mm lens

Significant advantages of the T3i (vs the Slice)

  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs 848 x 480 @ 30fps
  • Much larger sensor: APS-C 22.3x14.9mm vs 1/2.3" 6.2x4.6mm
  • Has a viewfinder: Pentamirror vs None

Significant disadvantages of the T3i (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • Much larger: Professional size 133x99x79 mm vs Super compact 104x60x17 mm
  • No image stabilization: None vs Lens

common strengths of the T3i and Slice

  • None found
arrow Compare the Canon Rebel T3i vs the Kodak Slice

Canon Rebel T5i

Canon Rebel T5i
3 years newer
$749 - $1,098 18-55mm lens

Significant advantages of the T5i (vs the Slice)

  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs 848 x 480 @ 30fps
  • Much larger sensor: APS-C 22.3x14.9mm vs 1/2.3" 6.2x4.6mm
  • Has a viewfinder: Pentamirror vs None

Significant disadvantages of the T5i (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • Much larger: Professional size 133x100x79 mm vs Super compact 104x60x17 mm
  • No image stabilization: None vs Lens

common strengths of the T5i and Slice

  • Have touch screens
arrow Compare the Canon Rebel T5i vs the Kodak Slice

compared toTravel zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Kodak Slice compared to travel zoom competitors include: it has a significantly larger screen (3.5" vs 2.7"), is slightly smaller (super compact 104x60x17 mm vs compact 102x64x30 mm), has a touch screen and is thinner (0.7" vs 1.2").

However, on average it has slightly less zoom (5x vs 12.5x), has a much narrower wide angle lens (35 mm vs 24 mm), has a much narrower aperture (f/4.8 vs f/3.0), records lower quality movies (848 x 480 @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps) and doesn't record movies in 24p.

Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS10

Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS10
1 year newer
$300 - $310

Significant advantages of the DMC-ZS10 (vs the Slice)

  • Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 35 mm
  • Has a GPS
  • Much wider aperture: f/3.3 vs f/4.8

Significant disadvantages of the DMC-ZS10 (vs the Slice)

  • Significantly larger: Compact 105x58x33 mm vs Super compact 104x60x17 mm
  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • Much thicker: 1.3" vs 0.7"

common strengths of the DMC-ZS10 and Slice

  • Have touch screens
arrow Compare the Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS10 vs the Kodak Slice

Canon PowerShot ELPH 140 IS

Canon PowerShot ELPH 140 IS
4 years newer
$119 - $162

Significant advantages of the ELPH 140 IS (vs the Slice)

  • Much wider aperture: f/3.2 vs f/4.8
  • Significantly better wide angle: 28 mm vs 35 mm
  • Much better macro capability: 1 cm vs 10 cm

Significant disadvantages of the ELPH 140 IS (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the ELPH 140 IS and Slice

  • Fairly small: Super compact 95x54x22 mm vs Super compact 104x60x17 mm
  • Thin: 0.9" vs 0.7"
  • Light weight: 130 g vs 158 g
arrow Compare the Canon PowerShot ELPH 140 IS vs the Kodak Slice

Panasonic Lumix ZS15

Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS15
2 years newer
$445

Significant advantages of the ZS15 (vs the Slice)

  • Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 35 mm
  • Much wider aperture: f/3.3 vs f/4.8
  • More zoom: 16x vs 5x

Significant disadvantages of the ZS15 (vs the Slice)

  • Significantly larger: Compact 105x58x33 mm vs Super compact 104x60x17 mm
  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the ZS15 and Slice

  • None found
arrow Compare the Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS15 vs the Kodak Slice

Kodak EasyShare M580

Kodak EasyShare M580
similar age
$110

Significant advantages of the M580 (vs the Slice)

  • Significantly better wide angle: 28 mm vs 35 mm

Significant disadvantages of the M580 (vs the Slice)

  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen
  • Thicker: 1" vs 0.7"

common strengths of the M580 and Slice

  • Fairly small: Compact 100x59x25 mm vs Super compact 104x60x17 mm
  • Thin: 1" vs 0.7"
  • Light weight: 150 g vs 158 g
arrow Compare the EasyShare M580 vs the Slice

Canon ELPH 310 HS

Canon ELPH 310 HS
1 year newer
$250

Significant advantages of the 310 HS (vs the Slice)

  • Much wider aperture: f/3.0 vs f/4.8
  • Significantly better wide angle: 28 mm vs 35 mm
  • Supports 24p

Significant disadvantages of the 310 HS (vs the Slice)

  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the 310 HS and Slice

  • Fairly small: Super compact 96x57x22 mm vs Super compact 104x60x17 mm
  • Thin: 0.9" vs 0.7"
  • Light weight: 140 g vs 158 g
arrow Compare the Canon ELPH 310 HS vs the Kodak Slice

Olympus SZ-20

Olympus SZ-20
1 year newer
$199

Significant advantages of the SZ-20 (vs the Slice)

  • Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 35 mm
  • Much wider aperture: f/3.0 vs f/4.8
  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs 848 x 480 @ 30fps

Significant disadvantages of the SZ-20 (vs the Slice)

  • Significantly larger: Compact 102x64x30 mm vs Super compact 104x60x17 mm
  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the SZ-20 and Slice

  • None found
arrow Compare the Olympus SZ-20 vs the Kodak Slice