As well as being compared against other compacts, the Kodak Slice is also often compared to entry-level DSLRs, travel zooms and ultra compacts. The Kodak Slice's top rivals come from Canon (such as the Rebel T4i and the Rebel T3i) and Fujifilm (such as the FinePix Z90)

compared toCompact competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Kodak Slice compared to other compact competitors include: it has a significantly larger screen (3.5" vs 3"), has better image stabilization (lens vs digital) and is thinner (0.7" vs 0.8").

However, on average it has a significantly narrower aperture (f/4.8 vs f/3.9), records lower quality movies (848 x 480 @ 30fps vs 720p @ 30fps), has a much narrower wide angle lens (35 mm vs 28 mm), doesn't have an OLED screen (LCD vs OLED) and is older (january 2010 vs february 2011).

Fujifilm FinePix Z90

Fujifilm FinePix Z90
1 year newer
$159

Significant advantages of the Z90 (vs the Slice)

  • Much better wide angle: 28 mm vs 35 mm
  • Significantly wider aperture: f/3.9 vs f/4.8

Significant disadvantages of the Z90 (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • Worse image stabilization:
    1. Digital
    vs
    1. Lens

common strengths of the Z90 and Slice

  • Larger than average screens: 3" vs 3.5"
  • Fairly small: Super compact (95×57×20 mm) vs Super compact (104×60×17 mm)
  • Have touch screens

Nikon Coolpix S70

Nikon Coolpix S70
5 months older
$180

Significant advantages of the S70 (vs the Slice)

  • Much better wide angle: 28 mm vs 35 mm
  • Has an OLED screen: OLED vs LCD
  • Significantly wider aperture: f/3.9 vs f/4.8

Significant disadvantages of the S70 (vs the Slice)

  • None found

common strengths of the S70 and Slice

  • Very large screens: 3.5" vs 3.5"
  • Fairly small: Super compact (97×61×20 mm) vs Super compact (104×60×17 mm)
  • Good image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs
    1. Lens

compared toEntry-level DSLR competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Kodak Slice compared to entry-level DSLR competitors include: it has a much larger screen (3.5" vs 3"), has image stabilization (lens vs none), has a touch screen, is much smaller (super compact (104×60×17 mm) vs professional size (133×100×79 mm)) and is slightly less expensive ($199.99 vs $500.00).

However, on average it records lower quality movies (848 x 480 @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps), takes much lower resolution photos (9.7 MP vs 24.1 MP), doesn't record movies in 24p, doesn't shoot as fast continuously (3 fps vs 4 fps) and doesn't have a screen which flips out.

Canon Rebel T4i

Canon Rebel T4i
2 years newer
$699 (body only)
$700 18-55mm lens

Significant advantages of the T4i (vs the Slice)

  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs 848 x 480 @ 30fps
  • Has a viewfinder: Pentamirror vs None
  • Supports 24p

Significant disadvantages of the T4i (vs the Slice)

  • No image stabilization: None vs
    1. Lens
  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • Much larger: Professional size (133×100×79 mm) vs Super compact (104×60×17 mm)

common strengths of the T4i and Slice

  • Have touch screens

Canon Rebel T3i

Canon Rebel T3i
1 year newer
$500 (body only)
$752 18-135mm lens

Significant advantages of the T3i (vs the Slice)

  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs 848 x 480 @ 30fps
  • Has a viewfinder: Pentamirror vs None
  • Supports 24p

Significant disadvantages of the T3i (vs the Slice)

  • No image stabilization: None vs
    1. Lens
  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • Much larger: Professional size (133×100×80 mm) vs Super compact (104×60×17 mm)

common strengths of the T3i and Slice

  • Inexpensive: $500.00 vs $199.99

Nikon D3200

Nikon D3200
2 years newer
$299 (body only)
$419 18-55mm lens

Significant advantages of the D3200 (vs the Slice)

  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs 848 x 480 @ 30fps
  • Has a viewfinder: Pentamirror vs None
  • Much higher true resolution: 24.1 MP vs 9.7 MP

Significant disadvantages of the D3200 (vs the Slice)

  • No image stabilization: None vs
    1. Lens
  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • Much thicker: 3" vs 0.7"

common strengths of the D3200 and Slice

  • Fairly small: Prosumer size (125×96×77 mm) vs Super compact (104×60×17 mm)
  • Light weight: 505 g vs 158 g
  • Inexpensive: $299.00 vs $199.99

Canon EOS Rebel T5

Canon EOS Rebel T5
4 years newer
$349 (body only)
$420 18-55mm lens

Significant advantages of the Rebel T5 (vs the Slice)

  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs 848 x 480 @ 30fps
  • Has a viewfinder: Pentamirror vs None
  • Supports 24p

Significant disadvantages of the Rebel T5 (vs the Slice)

  • No image stabilization: None vs
    1. Lens
  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • Much larger: Professional size (130×100×78 mm) vs Super compact (104×60×17 mm)

common strengths of the Rebel T5 and Slice

  • Light weight: 480 g vs 158 g
  • Inexpensive: $349.00 vs $199.99

compared toTravel zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Kodak Slice compared to travel zoom competitors include: it has a much larger screen (3.5" vs 2.5"), is significantly smaller (super compact (104×60×17 mm) vs compact (90×64×39 mm)), has a touch screen, is newer (january 2010 vs january 2009) and is thinner (0.7" vs 1.5").

However, on average it has a significantly narrower wide angle lens (35 mm vs 28 mm) and has a significantly narrower aperture (f/4.8 vs f/3.5).

Kodak EasyShare M580

Kodak EasyShare M580
similar age
$189

Significant advantages of the M580 (vs the Slice)

  • Much better wide angle: 28 mm vs 35 mm

Significant disadvantages of the M580 (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen
  • Larger: Compact (101×60×26 mm) vs Super compact (104×60×17 mm)

common strengths of the M580 and Slice

  • Larger than average screens: 3" vs 3.5"
  • Fairly small: Compact (101×60×26 mm) vs Super compact (104×60×17 mm)
  • Thin: 1" vs 0.7"

Kodak EasyShare Z915

Kodak EasyShare Z915
1 year older
$220

Significant advantages of the Z915 (vs the Slice)

  • Much wider aperture: f/3.5 vs f/4.8

Significant disadvantages of the Z915 (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 2.5" vs 3.5"
  • Much larger: Compact (90×64×39 mm) vs Super compact (104×60×17 mm)
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the Z915 and Slice

  • None found

compared toUltra compact competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Kodak Slice compared to ultra compact competitors include: it has a much larger screen (3.5" vs 2.5"), has a touch screen, is newer (january 2010 vs february 2009) and has a faster max shutter speed (1/2000 of a second vs 1/1500 of a second).

However, on average it has a much narrower aperture (f/4.8 vs f/3.2), records lower quality movies (848 x 480 @ 30fps vs 720p @ 30fps), has a slightly narrower wide angle lens (35 mm vs 33 mm), doesn't have a viewfinder (none vs tunnel) and slightly shorter exposures (8 seconds vs 15 seconds).

Canon PowerShot SD780 IS

Canon PowerShot SD780 IS
10 months older

Significant advantages of the SD780 IS (vs the Slice)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the SD780 IS (vs the Slice)

  • None found

common strengths of the SD780 IS and Slice

  • None found