As well as being compared against other compacts, the Kodak Slice is also often compared to entry-level DSLRs, boutiques, ultra compacts and travel zooms. The Kodak Slice's top rivals come from Canon (such as the PowerShot A3000 IS and the ELPH 500 HS) and Nikon (such as the D3100 and the Coolpix S80)

compared toCompact competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Kodak Slice compared to other compact competitors include: it has a significantly larger screen (3.5" vs 3.0"), has a touch screen and is thinner (0.7" vs 1").

However, on average it has a much narrower aperture (f/4.8 vs f/2.8), records lower quality movies (848 x 480 @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 24fps), has a significantly narrower wide angle lens (35 mm vs 24 mm), doesn't record high-speed movies (none vs 240 fps) and doesn't record movies in 24p.

Canon PowerShot A3000 IS

Canon PowerShot A3000 IS
similar age

Significant advantages of the A3000 IS (vs the Slice)

  • Much wider aperture: f/2.7 vs f/4.8
  • Much better macro capability: 3 cm vs 10 cm

Significant disadvantages of the A3000 IS (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen
  • Larger: Compact 97x58x28 mm vs Super compact 104x60x17 mm

common strengths of the A3000 IS and Slice

  • Good image stabilization: Lens vs Lens
arrow Compare the Canon PowerShot A3000 IS vs the Kodak Slice

Canon ELPH 500 HS

Canon ELPH 500 HS
1 year newer
$149

Significant advantages of the 500 HS (vs the Slice)

  • Much wider aperture: f/2.0 vs f/4.8
  • Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 35 mm
  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 24fps vs 848 x 480 @ 30fps

Significant disadvantages of the 500 HS (vs the Slice)

  • Thicker: 1" vs 0.7"

common strengths of the 500 HS and Slice

  • Larger than average screens: 3.2" vs 3.5"
  • Good image stabilization: Lens vs Lens
  • Have touch screens
arrow Compare the Canon ELPH 500 HS vs the Kodak Slice

Fujifilm FinePix Z90

Fujifilm FinePix Z90
1 year newer

Significant advantages of the Z90 (vs the Slice)

  • Significantly wider aperture: f/3.9 vs f/4.8
  • Significantly better wide angle: 28 mm vs 35 mm

Significant disadvantages of the Z90 (vs the Slice)

  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • Worse image stabilization: Digital vs Lens

common strengths of the Z90 and Slice

  • Fairly small: Super compact 95x56x20 mm vs Super compact 104x60x17 mm
  • Have touch screens
  • Thin: 0.8" vs 0.7"
arrow Compare the Fujifilm FinePix Z90 vs the Kodak Slice

Canon ELPH 300 HS

Canon ELPH 300 HS
1 year newer
$199

Significant advantages of the 300 HS (vs the Slice)

  • Much wider aperture: f/2.7 vs f/4.8
  • Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 35 mm
  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 24fps vs 848 x 480 @ 30fps

Significant disadvantages of the 300 HS (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the 300 HS and Slice

  • Fairly small: Super compact 92x55x19 mm vs Super compact 104x60x17 mm
  • Good image stabilization: Lens vs Lens
  • Thin: 0.8" vs 0.7"
arrow Compare the Canon ELPH 300 HS vs the Kodak Slice

Fujifilm FinePix Z1000 EXR

Fujifilm FinePix Z1000 EXR
2 years newer

Significant advantages of the Z1000 EXR (vs the Slice)

  • Significantly wider aperture: f/3.9 vs f/4.8
  • Significantly better wide angle: 28 mm vs 35 mm
  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs 848 x 480 @ 30fps

Significant disadvantages of the Z1000 EXR (vs the Slice)

  • None found

common strengths of the Z1000 EXR and Slice

  • Very large screens: 3.5" vs 3.5"
  • Fairly small: Super compact 102x60x18 mm vs Super compact 104x60x17 mm
  • Have touch screens
arrow Compare the Fujifilm FinePix Z1000 EXR vs the Kodak Slice

Canon ELPH 100 HS

Canon ELPH 100 HS
1 year newer
$180 - $471

Significant advantages of the 100 HS (vs the Slice)

  • Much wider aperture: f/2.8 vs f/4.8
  • Significantly better wide angle: 28 mm vs 35 mm
  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 24fps vs 848 x 480 @ 30fps

Significant disadvantages of the 100 HS (vs the Slice)

  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the 100 HS and Slice

  • Fairly small: Super compact 93x55x19 mm vs Super compact 104x60x17 mm
  • Good image stabilization: Lens vs Lens
  • Thin: 0.8" vs 0.7"
arrow Compare the Canon ELPH 100 HS vs the Kodak Slice

compared toEntry-level DSLR competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Kodak Slice compared to entry-level DSLR competitors include: it has a much larger screen (3.5" vs 3.0"), has image stabilization (lens vs none), has a touch screen, is much smaller (super compact 104x60x17 mm vs professional size 133x99x78 mm) and is thinner (0.7" vs 3.1").

However, on average it records lower quality movies (848 x 480 @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps), takes significantly lower resolution photos (9.7 MP vs 17.9 MP), doesn't record movies in 24p, doesn't shoot as fast continuously (3 fps vs 5 fps) and doesn't have a screen which flips out.

Nikon D3100

Nikon D3100
7 months newer
$278 (body only)
$392 - $427 18-55mm lens

Significant advantages of the D3100 (vs the Slice)

  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 24fps vs 848 x 480 @ 30fps
  • Much larger sensor: APS-C 23.1x15.4mm vs 1/2.3" 6.2x4.6mm
  • Has a viewfinder: Pentamirror vs None

Significant disadvantages of the D3100 (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • Much larger: Prosumer size 124x96x73 mm vs Super compact 104x60x17 mm
  • No image stabilization: None vs Lens

common strengths of the D3100 and Slice

  • Fairly small: Prosumer size 124x96x73 mm vs Super compact 104x60x17 mm
  • Thin: 2.9" vs 0.7"
  • Light weight: 505 g vs 158 g
arrow Compare the Nikon D3100 vs the Kodak Slice

Canon Rebel T5i

Canon Rebel T5i
3 years newer
$599 (body only)
$200 - $1,148 18-55mm lens

Significant advantages of the T5i (vs the Slice)

  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs 848 x 480 @ 30fps
  • Much larger sensor: APS-C 22.3x14.9mm vs 1/2.3" 6.2x4.6mm
  • Has a viewfinder: Pentamirror vs None

Significant disadvantages of the T5i (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • Much larger: Professional size 133x100x79 mm vs Super compact 104x60x17 mm
  • No image stabilization: None vs Lens

common strengths of the T5i and Slice

  • Have touch screens
arrow Compare the Canon Rebel T5i vs the Kodak Slice

Canon Rebel T3i

Canon Rebel T3i
1 year newer
$499 - $774 (body only)
$200 - $617 18-55mm lens

Significant advantages of the T3i (vs the Slice)

  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs 848 x 480 @ 30fps
  • Much larger sensor: APS-C 22.3x14.9mm vs 1/2.3" 6.2x4.6mm
  • Has a viewfinder: Pentamirror vs None

Significant disadvantages of the T3i (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • Much larger: Professional size 133x99x79 mm vs Super compact 104x60x17 mm
  • No image stabilization: None vs Lens

common strengths of the T3i and Slice

  • None found
arrow Compare the Canon Rebel T3i vs the Kodak Slice

Canon Rebel T4i

Canon Rebel T4i
2 years newer
$650 - $700 (body only)
$200 - $699 18-55mm lens

Significant advantages of the T4i (vs the Slice)

  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs 848 x 480 @ 30fps
  • Much larger sensor: APS-C 22.3x14.9mm vs 1/2.3" 6.2x4.6mm
  • Has a viewfinder: Pentamirror vs None

Significant disadvantages of the T4i (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • Much larger: Professional size 133x99x78 mm vs Super compact 104x60x17 mm
  • No image stabilization: None vs Lens

common strengths of the T4i and Slice

  • Have touch screens
arrow Compare the Canon Rebel T4i vs the Kodak Slice

compared toBoutique competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Kodak Slice compared to boutique competitors include: it has significantly more zoom (5x vs 1x), has a much larger screen (3.5" vs 2.0"), is much smaller (super compact 104x60x17 mm vs large 139x168x97 mm), has image stabilization (lens vs none) and has a touch screen.

However, on average it has a much narrower aperture (f/4.8 vs f/2.0), records lower quality movies (848 x 480 @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 60fps), has a slightly narrower wide angle lens (35 mm vs 24 mm), takes significantly lower resolution photos (9.7 MP vs 24 MP) and slightly lower maximum light sensitivity (3,200 ISO vs 25,600 ISO).

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-R1

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-R1
4 years older

Significant advantages of the DSC-R1 (vs the Slice)

  • Much wider aperture: f/2.8 vs f/4.8
  • Significantly better wide angle: 24 mm vs 35 mm
  • Shoots RAW

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-R1 (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 2.0" vs 3.5"
  • Much larger: Large 139x168x97 mm vs Super compact 104x60x17 mm
  • No image stabilization: None vs Lens

common strengths of the DSC-R1 and Slice

  • Incredible zoom: 5x vs 5x
arrow Compare the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-R1 vs the Kodak Slice

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX1

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX1
2 years newer
$2,798 - $2,799

Significant advantages of the DSC-RX1 (vs the Slice)

  • Much wider aperture: f/2.0 vs f/4.8
  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 60fps vs 848 x 480 @ 30fps
  • Much larger sensor: Full frame 35.8x23.8mm vs 1/2.3" 6.2x4.6mm

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-RX1 (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • Much less zoom: 1x vs 5x
  • No image stabilization: None vs Lens

common strengths of the DSC-RX1 and Slice

  • None found
arrow Compare the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX1 vs the Kodak Slice

compared toUltra compact competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Kodak Slice compared to ultra compact competitors include: it has a significantly larger screen (3.5" vs 3.0") and has a touch screen.

However, on average it has a much narrower aperture (f/4.8 vs f/2.6), records lower quality movies (848 x 480 @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 24fps), has a significantly narrower wide angle lens (35 mm vs 28 mm), slightly lower maximum light sensitivity (3,200 ISO vs 12,800 ISO) and doesn't record movies in 24p.

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX30

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX30
3 years newer
$198 - $199

Significant advantages of the DSC-TX30 (vs the Slice)

  • Much wider aperture: f/3.5 vs f/4.8
  • Much better wide angle: 26 mm vs 35 mm
  • Has an OLED screen: OLED vs LCD

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-TX30 (vs the Slice)

  • None found

common strengths of the DSC-TX30 and Slice

  • Each has a built-in flash
  • Very large screens: 3.3" vs 3.5"
  • Very good image stabilization: Lens vs Lens
arrow Compare the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX30 vs the Kodak Slice

Kodak EasyShare M590

Kodak EasyShare M590
7 months newer

Significant advantages of the M590 (vs the Slice)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the M590 (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the M590 and Slice

  • Each has a built-in flash
  • Very good image stabilization: Lens vs Lens
  • Very thin: 0.6" vs 0.7"
arrow Compare the EasyShare M590 vs the Slice

Canon PowerShot ELPH 520 HS

Canon ELPH 520 HS
2 years newer
$155 - $175

Significant advantages of the ELPH 520 HS (vs the Slice)

  • Much wider aperture: f/3.4 vs f/4.8
  • Significantly better wide angle: 28 mm vs 35 mm
  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 24fps vs 848 x 480 @ 30fps

Significant disadvantages of the ELPH 520 HS (vs the Slice)

  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the ELPH 520 HS and Slice

  • Each has a built-in flash
  • Larger than average screens: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • Very good image stabilization: Lens vs Lens
arrow Compare the Canon ELPH 520 HS vs the Kodak Slice

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900
10 months older

Significant advantages of the DSC-T900 (vs the Slice)

  • Much wider aperture: f/3.5 vs f/4.8

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-T900 (vs the Slice)

  • No touch screen

common strengths of the DSC-T900 and Slice

  • Each has a built-in flash
  • Very large screens: 3.5" vs 3.5"
  • Very good image stabilization: Lens vs Lens
arrow Compare the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900 vs the Kodak Slice

Sony Cyber-shot WX50

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX50
2 years newer
$199

Significant advantages of the WX50 (vs the Slice)

  • Much wider aperture: f/2.6 vs f/4.8
  • Much better wide angle: 25 mm vs 35 mm
  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 60fps vs 848 x 480 @ 30fps

Significant disadvantages of the WX50 (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the WX50 and Slice

  • Each has a built-in flash
  • Very good image stabilization: Lens vs Lens
  • Thin: 0.7" vs 0.7"
arrow Compare the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX50 vs the Kodak Slice

compared toTravel zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Kodak Slice compared to travel zoom competitors include: it has a significantly larger screen (3.5" vs 2.7"), is slightly smaller (super compact 104x60x17 mm vs compact 104x58x28 mm), has a touch screen, is thinner (0.7" vs 1.1") and is slightly lighter (158 g vs 193 g).

However, on average it has significantly less zoom (5x vs 20x), has a much narrower wide angle lens (35 mm vs 25 mm), has a much narrower aperture (f/4.8 vs f/3.2), doesn't have a built-in GPS and records lower quality movies (848 x 480 @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps).

Canon ELPH 310 HS

Canon ELPH 310 HS
1 year newer
$369

Significant advantages of the 310 HS (vs the Slice)

  • Much wider aperture: f/3.0 vs f/4.8
  • Significantly better wide angle: 28 mm vs 35 mm
  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs 848 x 480 @ 30fps

Significant disadvantages of the 310 HS (vs the Slice)

  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the 310 HS and Slice

  • Fairly small: Super compact 96x57x22 mm vs Super compact 104x60x17 mm
  • Thin: 0.9" vs 0.7"
  • Light weight: 140 g vs 158 g
arrow Compare the Canon ELPH 310 HS vs the Kodak Slice

Canon PowerShot ELPH 140 IS

Canon PowerShot ELPH 140 IS
4 years newer
$129 - $162

Significant advantages of the ELPH 140 IS (vs the Slice)

  • Much wider aperture: f/3.2 vs f/4.8
  • Significantly better wide angle: 28 mm vs 35 mm
  • Much better macro capability: 1 cm vs 10 cm

Significant disadvantages of the ELPH 140 IS (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the ELPH 140 IS and Slice

  • Very small: Super compact 95x54x22 mm vs Super compact 104x60x17 mm
  • Thin: 0.9" vs 0.7"
  • Light weight: 130 g vs 158 g
arrow Compare the Canon PowerShot ELPH 140 IS vs the Kodak Slice

Panasonic Lumix ZS30

Panasonic Lumix ZS30
3 years newer
$350 - $440

Significant advantages of the ZS30 (vs the Slice)

  • Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 35 mm
  • Much wider aperture: f/3.3 vs f/4.8
  • Has a GPS

Significant disadvantages of the ZS30 (vs the Slice)

  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • Significantly larger: Compact 105x59x28 mm vs Super compact 104x60x17 mm
  • Significantly thicker: 1.1" vs 0.7"

common strengths of the ZS30 and Slice

  • Have touch screens
arrow Compare the Panasonic Lumix ZS30 vs the Kodak Slice

Panasonic Lumix ZS25

Panasonic Lumix ZS25
3 years newer
$149 - $240

Significant advantages of the ZS25 (vs the Slice)

  • Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 35 mm
  • Much wider aperture: f/3.3 vs f/4.8
  • Significantly more zoom: 20x vs 5x

Significant disadvantages of the ZS25 (vs the Slice)

  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen
  • Significantly larger: Compact 104x58x28 mm vs Super compact 104x60x17 mm

common strengths of the ZS25 and Slice

  • None found
arrow Compare the Panasonic Lumix ZS25 vs the Kodak Slice

Samsung HZ30W

Samsung HZ30W
similar age

Significant advantages of the HZ30W (vs the Slice)

  • Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 35 mm
  • Much wider aperture: f/3.2 vs f/4.8
  • Much better macro capability: 3 cm vs 10 cm

Significant disadvantages of the HZ30W (vs the Slice)

  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen
  • Significantly larger: Compact 107x61x28 mm vs Super compact 104x60x17 mm

common strengths of the HZ30W and Slice

  • None found
arrow Compare the Samsung HZ30W vs the Kodak Slice

Nikon Coolpix S9500

Nikon Coolpix S9500
3 years newer
$211

Significant advantages of the S9500 (vs the Slice)

  • Much better wide angle: 25 mm vs 35 mm
  • Much more zoom: 22x vs 5x
  • Has a GPS

Significant disadvantages of the S9500 (vs the Slice)

  • Significantly larger: Compact 110x60x31 mm vs Super compact 104x60x17 mm
  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the S9500 and Slice

  • None found
arrow Compare the Nikon Coolpix S9500 vs the Kodak Slice