As well as being compared against other compacts, the Kodak Slice is also often compared to travel zooms, ultra compacts, entry-level DSLRs and waterproofs. The Kodak Slice's top rivals come from Canon (such as the ELPH 100 HS and the PowerShot ELPH 110 HS) and Sony (such as the Cybershot DSC-HX9v and the Cyber-shot DSC-TX100v)

compared toCompact competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Kodak Slice compared to other compact competitors include: it has a slightly larger screen (3.5" vs 3.2") and has a touch screen.

However, on average it has a much narrower aperture (f/4.8 vs f/2.8), records lower quality movies (848 x 480 @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 24fps), has a significantly narrower wide angle lens (35 mm vs 27 mm), doesn't record high-speed movies (none vs 240 fps) and doesn't record movies in 24p.

Canon ELPH 100 HS

Canon ELPH 100 HS
1 year newer
$124 - $180

Significant advantages of the 100 HS (vs the Slice)

  • Much wider aperture: f/2.8 vs f/4.8
  • Significantly better wide angle: 28 mm vs 35 mm
  • Supports 24p

Significant disadvantages of the 100 HS (vs the Slice)

  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the 100 HS and Slice

  • Fairly small: Super compact 93x55x19 mm vs Super compact 104x60x17 mm
  • Good image stabilization: Lens vs Lens
  • Thin: 0.8" vs 0.7"

Canon PowerShot ELPH 110 HS

Canon PowerShot ELPH 110 HS
2 years newer
$199

Significant advantages of the ELPH 110 HS (vs the Slice)

  • Much wider aperture: f/2.7 vs f/4.8
  • Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 35 mm
  • Supports 24p

Significant disadvantages of the ELPH 110 HS (vs the Slice)

  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the ELPH 110 HS and Slice

  • Fairly small: Super compact 93x57x20 mm vs Super compact 104x60x17 mm
  • Good image stabilization: Lens vs Lens
  • Thin: 0.8" vs 0.7"

Canon PowerShot SD3500 IS

Canon PowerShot SD3500 IS
similar age
$269

Significant advantages of the SD3500 IS (vs the Slice)

  • Much wider aperture: f/2.8 vs f/4.8
  • Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 35 mm
  • Much better macro capability: 3 cm vs 10 cm

Significant disadvantages of the SD3500 IS (vs the Slice)

  • None found

common strengths of the SD3500 IS and Slice

  • Very large screens: 3.5" vs 3.5"
  • Fairly small: Super compact 99x56x22 mm vs Super compact 104x60x17 mm
  • Good image stabilization: Lens vs Lens

Nikon Coolpix S80

Nikon Coolpix S80
8 months newer
$130

Significant advantages of the S80 (vs the Slice)

  • Significantly wider aperture: f/3.6 vs f/4.8
  • Has an OLED screen: OLED vs LCD
  • Supports 24p

Significant disadvantages of the S80 (vs the Slice)

  • None found

common strengths of the S80 and Slice

  • Very large screens: 3.5" vs 3.5"
  • Fairly small: Super compact 99x63x17 mm vs Super compact 104x60x17 mm
  • Good image stabilization: Lens vs Lens

Canon ELPH 320 HS

Canon PowerShot ELPH 320 HS
2 years newer
$180 - $250

Significant advantages of the 320 HS (vs the Slice)

  • Much wider aperture: f/2.7 vs f/4.8
  • Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 35 mm
  • Supports 24p

Significant disadvantages of the 320 HS (vs the Slice)

  • None found

common strengths of the 320 HS and Slice

  • Larger than average screens: 3.2" vs 3.5"
  • Fairly small: Super compact 94x57x21 mm vs Super compact 104x60x17 mm
  • Good image stabilization: Lens vs Lens

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX100v

Sony Cybershot DSC-TX100V
1 year newer
$180

Significant advantages of the DSC-TX100v (vs the Slice)

  • Much wider aperture: f/3.5 vs f/4.8
  • Significantly better wide angle: 27 mm vs 35 mm
  • Has an OLED screen: OLED vs LCD

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-TX100v (vs the Slice)

  • None found

common strengths of the DSC-TX100v and Slice

  • Very large screens: 3.5" vs 3.5"
  • Fairly small: Super compact 96x58x17 mm vs Super compact 104x60x17 mm
  • Good image stabilization: Lens vs Lens

compared toTravel zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Kodak Slice compared to travel zoom competitors include: it has a significantly larger screen (3.5" vs 3.0"), is slightly smaller (super compact 104x60x17 mm vs compact 104x58x28 mm), has a touch screen, is thinner (0.7" vs 1.1") and is slightly lighter (158 g vs 231 g).

However, on average it has significantly less zoom (5x vs 16x), has a much narrower wide angle lens (35 mm vs 25 mm), has a much narrower aperture (f/4.8 vs f/3.3), doesn't have a built-in GPS and records lower quality movies (848 x 480 @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 24fps).

Sony Cybershot DSC-HX9v

Sony Cybershot DSC-HX9v
1 year newer

Significant advantages of the DSC-HX9v (vs the Slice)

  • Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 35 mm
  • Has a GPS
  • Much wider aperture: f/3.3 vs f/4.8

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-HX9v (vs the Slice)

  • Much larger: Compact 105x59x34 mm vs Super compact 104x60x17 mm
  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the DSC-HX9v and Slice

  • None found

Panasonic Lumix ZS25

Panasonic Lumix ZS25
3 years newer
$193 - $209

Significant advantages of the ZS25 (vs the Slice)

  • Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 35 mm
  • Much wider aperture: f/3.3 vs f/4.8
  • Significantly more zoom: 20x vs 5x

Significant disadvantages of the ZS25 (vs the Slice)

  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen
  • Significantly larger: Compact 104x58x28 mm vs Super compact 104x60x17 mm

common strengths of the ZS25 and Slice

  • None found

Canon PowerShot ELPH 520 HS

Canon ELPH 520 HS
2 years newer
$150 - $189

Significant advantages of the ELPH 520 HS (vs the Slice)

  • Much wider aperture: f/3.4 vs f/4.8
  • Significantly better wide angle: 28 mm vs 35 mm
  • Supports 24p

Significant disadvantages of the ELPH 520 HS (vs the Slice)

  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the ELPH 520 HS and Slice

  • Very small: Ultra compact 87x54x19 mm vs Super compact 104x60x17 mm
  • Thin: 0.7" vs 0.7"
  • Light weight: 155 g vs 158 g

Canon PowerShot ELPH 130 IS

Canon PowerShot ELPH 130 IS
3 years newer
$128 - $237

Significant advantages of the ELPH 130 IS (vs the Slice)

  • Much wider aperture: f/3.2 vs f/4.8
  • Significantly better wide angle: 28 mm vs 35 mm
  • Much better macro capability: 1 cm vs 10 cm

Significant disadvantages of the ELPH 130 IS (vs the Slice)

  • None found

common strengths of the ELPH 130 IS and Slice

  • Very small: Super compact 95x56x21 mm vs Super compact 104x60x17 mm
  • Thin: 0.8" vs 0.7"
  • Light weight: 133 g vs 158 g

Samsung HZ30W

Samsung HZ30W
similar age

Significant advantages of the HZ30W (vs the Slice)

  • Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 35 mm
  • Much wider aperture: f/3.2 vs f/4.8
  • More zoom: 15x vs 5x

Significant disadvantages of the HZ30W (vs the Slice)

  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • Significantly larger: Compact 107x61x28 mm vs Super compact 104x60x17 mm
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the HZ30W and Slice

  • None found

Canon PowerShot SX260 HS

Canon PowerShot SX260 HS
2 years newer
$300 - $350

Significant advantages of the SX260 HS (vs the Slice)

  • Much better wide angle: 25 mm vs 35 mm
  • Has a GPS
  • Significantly more zoom: 20x vs 5x

Significant disadvantages of the SX260 HS (vs the Slice)

  • Much larger: Compact 106x61x33 mm vs Super compact 104x60x17 mm
  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the SX260 HS and Slice

  • None found

compared toUltra compact competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Kodak Slice compared to ultra compact competitors include: it has a significantly larger screen (3.5" vs 2.7") and has a touch screen.

However, on average it has a much narrower aperture (f/4.8 vs f/2.6), records lower quality movies (848 x 480 @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 60fps), has a slightly narrower wide angle lens (35 mm vs 26 mm), significantly lower maximum light sensitivity (3,200 ISO vs 12,800 ISO) and has a CCD-family sensor (CCD vs CMOS).

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX200V

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX200V
2 years newer
$300

Significant advantages of the DSC-TX200V (vs the Slice)

  • Much wider aperture: f/3.5 vs f/4.8
  • Much better wide angle: 26 mm vs 35 mm
  • Takes 3D photos

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-TX200V (vs the Slice)

  • None found

common strengths of the DSC-TX200V and Slice

  • Built-in flashes
  • Very large screens: 3.3" vs 3.5"
  • Very good image stabilization: Lens vs Lens

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900
10 months older
$290

Significant advantages of the DSC-T900 (vs the Slice)

  • Much wider aperture: f/3.5 vs f/4.8

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-T900 (vs the Slice)

  • No touch screen

common strengths of the DSC-T900 and Slice

  • Built-in flashes
  • Very large screens: 3.5" vs 3.5"
  • Very good image stabilization: Lens vs Lens

Sony Cyber-shot WX50

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX50
2 years newer
$200

Significant advantages of the WX50 (vs the Slice)

  • Much wider aperture: f/2.6 vs f/4.8
  • Much better wide angle: 25 mm vs 35 mm
  • Takes 3D photos

Significant disadvantages of the WX50 (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the WX50 and Slice

  • Built-in flashes
  • Very good image stabilization: Lens vs Lens
  • Thin: 0.7" vs 0.7"

Kodak EasyShare M590

Kodak EasyShare M590
7 months newer
$119

Significant advantages of the M590 (vs the Slice)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the M590 (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the M590 and Slice

  • Built-in flashes
  • Very good image stabilization: Lens vs Lens
  • Very thin: 0.6" vs 0.7"

compared toEntry-level DSLR competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Kodak Slice compared to entry-level DSLR competitors include: it has a much larger screen (3.5" vs 2.5"), has image stabilization (lens vs none), has a touch screen, is much smaller (super compact 104x60x17 mm vs professional size 133x99x78 mm) and is significantly less expensive ($104.99 vs $525.00).

However, on average it records lower quality movies (848 x 480 @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 24fps), takes much lower resolution photos (9.7 MP vs 17.9 MP), doesn't record movies in 24p, doesn't shoot as fast continuously (3 fps vs 4 fps) and doesn't have a screen which flips out.

Canon Rebel T4i

Canon Rebel T4i
2 years newer
$525 - $700 (body only)
$950 - $1,000 18-135mm lens

Significant advantages of the T4i (vs the Slice)

  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs 848 x 480 @ 30fps
  • Much larger sensor: APS-C 22.3x14.9mm vs 1/2.3" 6.2x4.6mm
  • Has a viewfinder: Pentamirror vs None

Significant disadvantages of the T4i (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • Much larger: Professional size 133x99x78 mm vs Super compact 104x60x17 mm
  • No image stabilization: None vs Lens

common strengths of the T4i and Slice

  • Have touch screens

Nikon D40X

Nikon D40X
2 years older
$1,000 (body only)
$850 18-55mm lens

Significant advantages of the D40X (vs the Slice)

  • Much larger sensor: APS-C 23.7x15.6mm vs 1/2.3" 6.2x4.6mm
  • Has a viewfinder: Pentamirror vs None
  • Shoots RAW

Significant disadvantages of the D40X (vs the Slice)

  • Does not take movies: None vs 848 x 480 @ 30fps
  • Much smaller screen: 2.5" vs 3.5"
  • No image stabilization: None vs Lens

common strengths of the D40X and Slice

  • Very small: Prosumer size 124x94x64 mm vs Super compact 104x60x17 mm
  • Very thin: 2.5" vs 0.7"
  • Light weight: 522 g vs 158 g

Nikon D3200

Nikon D3200
2 years newer
$309 - $527 (body only)
$389 - $447 18-55mm lens

Significant advantages of the D3200 (vs the Slice)

  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs 848 x 480 @ 30fps
  • Much larger sensor: APS-C 23.2x15.4mm vs 1/2.3" 6.2x4.6mm
  • Has a viewfinder: Pentamirror vs None

Significant disadvantages of the D3200 (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • Much larger: Prosumer size 125x96x76 mm vs Super compact 104x60x17 mm
  • No image stabilization: None vs Lens

common strengths of the D3200 and Slice

  • Light weight: 505 g vs 158 g
  • Inexpensive: $309.00 vs $104.99

Canon Rebel T5i

Canon Rebel T5i
3 years newer
$599 - $750 (body only)
$597 - $700 18-55mm lens

Significant advantages of the T5i (vs the Slice)

  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs 848 x 480 @ 30fps
  • Much larger sensor: APS-C 22.3x14.9mm vs 1/2.3" 6.2x4.6mm
  • Has a viewfinder: Pentamirror vs None

Significant disadvantages of the T5i (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • Much larger: Professional size 133x100x79 mm vs Super compact 104x60x17 mm
  • No image stabilization: None vs Lens

common strengths of the T5i and Slice

  • Have touch screens

Nikon D3100

Nikon D3100
7 months newer
$272 (body only)
$390 - $409 18-55mm lens

Significant advantages of the D3100 (vs the Slice)

  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 24fps vs 848 x 480 @ 30fps
  • Much larger sensor: APS-C 23.1x15.4mm vs 1/2.3" 6.2x4.6mm
  • Has a viewfinder: Pentamirror vs None

Significant disadvantages of the D3100 (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • Much larger: Prosumer size 124x96x73 mm vs Super compact 104x60x17 mm
  • No image stabilization: None vs Lens

common strengths of the D3100 and Slice

  • Fairly small: Prosumer size 124x96x73 mm vs Super compact 104x60x17 mm
  • Light weight: 505 g vs 158 g
  • Inexpensive: $272.29 vs $104.99

Canon Rebel T3i

Canon Rebel T3i
1 year newer
$499 - $550 (body only)
$549 - $630 18-55mm lens

Significant advantages of the T3i (vs the Slice)

  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs 848 x 480 @ 30fps
  • Much larger sensor: APS-C 22.3x14.9mm vs 1/2.3" 6.2x4.6mm
  • Has a viewfinder: Pentamirror vs None

Significant disadvantages of the T3i (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • Much larger: Professional size 133x99x79 mm vs Super compact 104x60x17 mm
  • No image stabilization: None vs Lens

common strengths of the T3i and Slice

  • None found

compared toWaterproof competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Kodak Slice compared to waterproof competitors include: it has a much larger screen (3.5" vs 2.7"), takes significantly higher resolution photos (9.7 MP vs 6 MP), has a touch screen, has a marginally larger sensor (1/2.3" 6.2x4.6mm vs 1/3" 4.8x3.6mm) and is thinner (0.7" vs 1.7").

However, on average it has a much narrower aperture (f/4.8 vs f/3.3), records lower quality movies (848 x 480 @ 30fps vs 720p @ 30fps), has a significantly narrower wide angle lens (35 mm vs 29 mm), much worse macro focusing (10 cm vs 5 cm) and is older (january, 2010 vs january, 2013).

Nikon Coolpix S31

Nikon Coolpix S31
3 years newer
$177

Significant advantages of the S31 (vs the Slice)

  • Much wider aperture: f/3.3 vs f/4.8
  • Significantly better wide angle: 29 mm vs 35 mm
  • Much better macro capability: 5 cm vs 10 cm

Significant disadvantages of the S31 (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen
  • Significantly lower true resolution: 6 MP vs 9.7 MP

common strengths of the S31 and Slice

  • Each has a built-in flash