As well as being compared against other compacts, the Kodak Slice is also often compared to ultra compacts, entry-level DSLRs, travel zooms and super zooms. The Kodak Slice's top rivals come from Sony (such as the Cyber-shot WX50 and the Cybershot DSC-HX9v) and Canon (such as the ELPH 310 HS and the Rebel T5i)

compared toCompact competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Kodak Slice compared to other compact competitors include: it has a slightly larger screen (3.5" vs 3.0"), is slightly smaller (super compact 104x60x17 mm vs compact 100x64x22 mm), has a touch screen and is thinner (0.7" vs 1.3").

However, on average it has a much narrower aperture (f/4.8 vs f/2.8), records lower quality movies (848 x 480 @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 24fps), has a much narrower wide angle lens (35 mm vs 26 mm), doesn't record high-speed movies (none vs 240 fps) and doesn't record movies in 24p.

Canon PowerShot SD3500 IS

Canon PowerShot SD3500 IS
similar age
$150

Significant advantages of the SD3500 IS (vs the Slice)

  • Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 35 mm
  • Much wider aperture: f/2.8 vs f/4.8
  • Much better macro capability: 3 cm vs 10 cm

Significant disadvantages of the SD3500 IS (vs the Slice)

  • None found

common strengths of the SD3500 IS and Slice

  • Very large screens: 3.5" vs 3.5"
  • Fairly small: Super compact 99x56x22 mm vs Super compact 104x60x17 mm
  • Good image stabilization: Lens vs Lens

Nikon Coolpix P340

Nikon Coolpix P340
4 years newer
$380

Significant advantages of the P340 (vs the Slice)

  • Much wider aperture: f/1.8 vs f/4.8
  • Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 35 mm
  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs 848 x 480 @ 30fps

Significant disadvantages of the P340 (vs the Slice)

  • No touch screen
  • Significantly larger: Compact 103x58x32 mm vs Super compact 104x60x17 mm
  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"

common strengths of the P340 and Slice

  • Good image stabilization: Lens vs Lens

Panasonic Lumix DMC-TS10

Panasonic Lumix DMC-TS10
6 months newer

Significant advantages of the DMC-TS10 (vs the Slice)

  • Much wider aperture: f/3.5 vs f/4.8
  • Significantly better macro capability: 5 cm vs 10 cm
  • Waterproof

Significant disadvantages of the DMC-TS10 (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the DMC-TS10 and Slice

  • Fairly small: Compact 100x64x22 mm vs Super compact 104x60x17 mm
  • Good image stabilization: Lens vs Lens
  • Thin: 0.9" vs 0.7"

Canon ELPH 320 HS

Canon PowerShot ELPH 320 HS
2 years newer
$203

Significant advantages of the 320 HS (vs the Slice)

  • Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 35 mm
  • Much wider aperture: f/2.7 vs f/4.8
  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 24fps vs 848 x 480 @ 30fps

Significant disadvantages of the 320 HS (vs the Slice)

  • Smaller screen: 3.2" vs 3.5"

common strengths of the 320 HS and Slice

  • Larger than average screens: 3.2" vs 3.5"
  • Fairly small: Super compact 94x57x21 mm vs Super compact 104x60x17 mm
  • Good image stabilization: Lens vs Lens

Nikon Coolpix S80

Nikon Coolpix S80
8 months newer
$120

Significant advantages of the S80 (vs the Slice)

  • Much wider aperture: f/3.6 vs f/4.8
  • Has an OLED screen: OLED vs LCD
  • Supports 24p

Significant disadvantages of the S80 (vs the Slice)

  • Slower max shutter speed: 1/1500 of a second vs 1/2000 of a second

common strengths of the S80 and Slice

  • Very large screens: 3.5" vs 3.5"
  • Fairly small: Super compact 99x63x17 mm vs Super compact 104x60x17 mm
  • Good image stabilization: Lens vs Lens

Olympus VG-160

Olympus VG-160
2 years newer
$107

Significant advantages of the VG-160 (vs the Slice)

  • Much better wide angle: 26 mm vs 35 mm
  • Much wider aperture: f/2.8 vs f/4.8
  • Much better macro capability: 2 cm vs 10 cm

Significant disadvantages of the VG-160 (vs the Slice)

  • Worse image stabilization: Digital vs Lens
  • No touch screen
  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"

common strengths of the VG-160 and Slice

  • Fairly small: Super compact 96x57x19 mm vs Super compact 104x60x17 mm
  • Thin: 0.7" vs 0.7"
  • Light weight: 125 g vs 158 g

compared toUltra compact competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Kodak Slice compared to ultra compact competitors include: it has a much larger screen (3.5" vs 2.7"), has a touch screen and has a faster max shutter speed (1/2000 of a second vs 1/1600 of a second).

However, on average it has a much narrower aperture (f/4.8 vs f/2.8), records lower quality movies (848 x 480 @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 24fps), has a much narrower wide angle lens (35 mm vs 26 mm), slightly lower maximum light sensitivity (3,200 ISO vs 12,800 ISO) and doesn't record movies in 24p.

Sony Cyber-shot WX50

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX50
2 years newer
$110

Significant advantages of the WX50 (vs the Slice)

  • Much better wide angle: 25 mm vs 35 mm
  • Much wider aperture: f/2.6 vs f/4.8
  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 60fps vs 848 x 480 @ 30fps

Significant disadvantages of the WX50 (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the WX50 and Slice

  • Built-in flashes
  • Very good image stabilization: Lens vs Lens
  • Very thin: 0.7" vs 0.7"

Nikon Coolpix S3100

Nikon Coolpix S3100
1 year newer
$110

Significant advantages of the S3100 (vs the Slice)

  • Much better wide angle: 26 mm vs 35 mm
  • Much wider aperture: f/3.2 vs f/4.8
  • Can create panoramas in-camera

Significant disadvantages of the S3100 (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen
  • Worse image stabilization: Sensor shift vs Lens

common strengths of the S3100 and Slice

  • Built-in flashes
  • Very good image stabilization: Sensor shift vs Lens
  • Very thin: 0.7" vs 0.7"

Panasonic Lumix DMC-XS3

Panasonic Lumix DMC-XS3
3 years newer
$97

Significant advantages of the DMC-XS3 (vs the Slice)

  • Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 35 mm
  • Much wider aperture: f/2.8 vs f/4.8
  • Higher resolution movies: 1980 x 1080 vs 848 x 480 @ 30fps

Significant disadvantages of the DMC-XS3 (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the DMC-XS3 and Slice

  • Built-in flashes
  • Very good image stabilization: Lens vs Lens
  • Very thin: 0.7" vs 0.7"

Kodak EasyShare M590

Kodak EasyShare M590
7 months newer
$160

Significant advantages of the M590 (vs the Slice)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the M590 (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen
  • Much slower max shutter speed: 1/1200 of a second vs 1/2000 of a second

common strengths of the M590 and Slice

  • Built-in flashes
  • Very good image stabilization: Lens vs Lens
  • Very thin: 0.6" vs 0.7"

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX200V

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX200V
2 years newer
$290

Significant advantages of the DSC-TX200V (vs the Slice)

  • Much better wide angle: 26 mm vs 35 mm
  • Much wider aperture: f/3.5 vs f/4.8
  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 60fps vs 848 x 480 @ 30fps

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-TX200V (vs the Slice)

  • None found

common strengths of the DSC-TX200V and Slice

  • Built-in flashes
  • Very large screens: 3.3" vs 3.5"
  • Very good image stabilization: Lens vs Lens

Canon PowerShot ELPH 520 HS

Canon ELPH 520 HS
2 years newer
$148

Significant advantages of the ELPH 520 HS (vs the Slice)

  • Much better wide angle: 28 mm vs 35 mm
  • Much wider aperture: f/3.4 vs f/4.8
  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 24fps vs 848 x 480 @ 30fps

Significant disadvantages of the ELPH 520 HS (vs the Slice)

  • No touch screen
  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"

common strengths of the ELPH 520 HS and Slice

  • Built-in flashes
  • Larger than average screens: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • Very good image stabilization: Lens vs Lens

compared toEntry-level DSLR competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Kodak Slice compared to entry-level DSLR competitors include: it has a much larger screen (3.5" vs 3.0"), has image stabilization (lens vs none), has a touch screen, is much smaller (super compact 104x60x17 mm vs professional size 133x99x78 mm) and is significantly less expensive ($199.00 vs $499.00).

However, on average it records lower quality movies (848 x 480 @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps), takes much lower resolution photos (9.7 MP vs 24.1 MP), doesn't record movies in 24p, doesn't shoot as fast continuously (3 fps vs 5 fps) and doesn't have a screen which flips out.

Canon Rebel T5i

Canon Rebel T5i
3 years newer
$649 - $650 (body only)
$620 - $700 18-55mm lens

Significant advantages of the T5i (vs the Slice)

  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs 848 x 480 @ 30fps
  • Has a viewfinder: Pentamirror vs None
  • Faster autofocus: Phase detection vs Contrast detection

Significant disadvantages of the T5i (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • Much larger: Professional size 133x100x79 mm vs Super compact 104x60x17 mm
  • No image stabilization: None vs Lens

common strengths of the T5i and Slice

  • Have touch screens

Canon Rebel T4i

Canon Rebel T4i
2 years newer
$525 (body only)
$630 18-135mm lens

Significant advantages of the T4i (vs the Slice)

  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs 848 x 480 @ 30fps
  • Has a viewfinder: Pentamirror vs None
  • Faster autofocus: Phase detection vs Contrast detection

Significant disadvantages of the T4i (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • Much larger: Professional size 133x99x78 mm vs Super compact 104x60x17 mm
  • No image stabilization: None vs Lens

common strengths of the T4i and Slice

  • Have touch screens

Nikon D3200

Nikon D3200
2 years newer
$279 - $557 (body only)
$349 - $447 18-55mm lens

Significant advantages of the D3200 (vs the Slice)

  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs 848 x 480 @ 30fps
  • Has a viewfinder: Pentamirror vs None
  • Much higher true resolution: 24.1 MP vs 9.7 MP

Significant disadvantages of the D3200 (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • Much larger: Prosumer size 125x96x76 mm vs Super compact 104x60x17 mm
  • No image stabilization: None vs Lens

common strengths of the D3200 and Slice

  • Light weight: 505 g vs 158 g
  • Very inexpensive: $279.00 vs $199.00

Canon Rebel T3i

Canon Rebel T3i
1 year newer
$499 - $569 (body only)
$566 - $599 18-55mm lens

Significant advantages of the T3i (vs the Slice)

  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs 848 x 480 @ 30fps
  • Has a viewfinder: Pentamirror vs None
  • Faster autofocus: Phase detection vs Contrast detection

Significant disadvantages of the T3i (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • Much larger: Professional size 133x99x79 mm vs Super compact 104x60x17 mm
  • No image stabilization: None vs Lens

common strengths of the T3i and Slice

  • Inexpensive: $499.00 vs $199.00

compared toTravel zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Kodak Slice compared to travel zoom competitors include: it has a significantly larger screen (3.5" vs 3.0"), is significantly smaller (super compact 104x60x17 mm vs compact 102x64x30 mm), has a touch screen, is thinner (0.7" vs 1.2") and is slightly lighter (158 g vs 214 g).

However, on average it has significantly less zoom (5x vs 20x), has a much narrower wide angle lens (35 mm vs 24 mm), has a much narrower aperture (f/4.8 vs f/3.0), doesn't have a built-in GPS and records lower quality movies (848 x 480 @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 50fps).

Canon ELPH 310 HS

Canon ELPH 310 HS
1 year newer
$258

Significant advantages of the 310 HS (vs the Slice)

  • Much better wide angle: 28 mm vs 35 mm
  • Much wider aperture: f/3.0 vs f/4.8
  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs 848 x 480 @ 30fps

Significant disadvantages of the 310 HS (vs the Slice)

  • No touch screen
  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"

common strengths of the 310 HS and Slice

  • Fairly small: Super compact 96x57x22 mm vs Super compact 104x60x17 mm
  • Thin: 0.9" vs 0.7"
  • Light weight: 140 g vs 158 g

Panasonic Lumix ZS20

Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS20
2 years newer
$300

Significant advantages of the ZS20 (vs the Slice)

  • Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 35 mm
  • Much wider aperture: f/3.3 vs f/4.8
  • Has a GPS

Significant disadvantages of the ZS20 (vs the Slice)

  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • Significantly larger: Compact 105x59x28 mm vs Super compact 104x60x17 mm
  • Significantly thicker: 1.1" vs 0.7"

common strengths of the ZS20 and Slice

  • Have touch screens

Canon PowerShot SX270 HS

Canon PowerShot SX270 HS
3 years newer
$225 - $361

Significant advantages of the SX270 HS (vs the Slice)

  • Much better wide angle: 25 mm vs 35 mm
  • Much wider aperture: f/3.5 vs f/4.8
  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 60fps vs 848 x 480 @ 30fps

Significant disadvantages of the SX270 HS (vs the Slice)

  • Much larger: Compact 106x63x33 mm vs Super compact 104x60x17 mm
  • No touch screen
  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"

common strengths of the SX270 HS and Slice

  • None found

Sony Cybershot DSC-HX9v

Sony Cybershot DSC-HX9v
1 year newer

Significant advantages of the DSC-HX9v (vs the Slice)

  • Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 35 mm
  • Much wider aperture: f/3.3 vs f/4.8
  • Has a GPS

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-HX9v (vs the Slice)

  • Much larger: Compact 105x59x34 mm vs Super compact 104x60x17 mm
  • No touch screen
  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"

common strengths of the DSC-HX9v and Slice

  • None found

Panasonic Lumix DMC-TZ60

Panasonic Lumix DMC-TZ60
4 years newer
$260

Significant advantages of the DMC-TZ60 (vs the Slice)

  • Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 35 mm
  • Much more zoom: 30x vs 5x
  • Much wider aperture: f/3.3 vs f/4.8

Significant disadvantages of the DMC-TZ60 (vs the Slice)

  • Much larger: Compact 110x64x34 mm vs Super compact 104x60x17 mm
  • No touch screen
  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"

common strengths of the DMC-TZ60 and Slice

  • None found

Olympus SZ-20

Olympus SZ-20
1 year newer

Significant advantages of the SZ-20 (vs the Slice)

  • Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 35 mm
  • Much wider aperture: f/3.0 vs f/4.8
  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs 848 x 480 @ 30fps

Significant disadvantages of the SZ-20 (vs the Slice)

  • Significantly larger: Compact 102x64x30 mm vs Super compact 104x60x17 mm
  • No touch screen
  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"

common strengths of the SZ-20 and Slice

  • None found

compared toSuper zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Kodak Slice compared to super zoom competitors include: it has a significantly larger screen (3.5" vs 3.0"), is significantly smaller (super compact 104x60x17 mm vs professional size 122x84x98 mm), has a touch screen, is thinner (0.7" vs 3.9") and is significantly lighter (158 g vs 494 g).

However, on average it has a much narrower aperture (f/4.8 vs f/3.0), has significantly less zoom (5x vs 41.7x), records lower quality movies (848 x 480 @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps), has a much narrower wide angle lens (35 mm vs 23 mm) and doesn't record high-speed movies (none vs 240 fps).

Nikon Coolpix L820

Nikon Coolpix L820
3 years newer
$160

Significant advantages of the L820 (vs the Slice)

  • Much wider aperture: f/3.0 vs f/4.8
  • Much better wide angle: 23 mm vs 35 mm
  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs 848 x 480 @ 30fps

Significant disadvantages of the L820 (vs the Slice)

  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen
  • Significantly larger: Prosumer size 111x76x85 mm vs Super compact 104x60x17 mm

common strengths of the L820 and Slice

  • Fairly small: Prosumer size 111x76x85 mm vs Super compact 104x60x17 mm
  • Light weight: 470 g vs 158 g
  • Inexpensive: $159.95 vs $199.00

Nikon Coolpix P530

Nikon Coolpix P530
4 years newer
$215 - $327

Significant advantages of the P530 (vs the Slice)

  • Much wider aperture: f/3.0 vs f/4.8
  • Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 35 mm
  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs 848 x 480 @ 30fps

Significant disadvantages of the P530 (vs the Slice)

  • Significantly larger: Professional size 122x84x98 mm vs Super compact 104x60x17 mm
  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the P530 and Slice

  • Inexpensive: $214.95 vs $199.00