As well as being compared against other compacts, the Kodak Slice is also often compared to ultra compacts, entry-level DSLRs, travel zooms and super zooms. The Kodak Slice's top rivals come from Canon (such as the PowerShot SD980 IS and the Rebel T5i) and Fujifilm (such as the FinePix Z90 and the FinePix Z1000 EXR)

compared toCompact competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Kodak Slice compared to other compact competitors include: it has a much larger screen (3.5" vs 2.7"), is slightly smaller (super compact (104×60×17 mm) vs compact (103×58×32 mm)), has a touch screen, is thinner (0.7" vs 1.3") and is slightly less expensive ($199.00 vs $295.00).

However, on average it has a much narrower aperture (f/4.8 vs f/1.8), records lower quality movies (848 x 480 @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 24fps), has a much narrower wide angle lens (35 mm vs 24 mm), doesn't record high-speed movies (none vs 240 fps) and doesn't record movies in 24p.

Fujifilm FinePix Z90

Fujifilm FinePix Z90
1 year newer
$269

Significant advantages of the Z90 (vs the Slice)

  • Much better wide angle: 28 mm vs 35 mm
  • Significantly wider aperture: f/3.9 vs f/4.8

Significant disadvantages of the Z90 (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • Worse image stabilization:
    1. Digital
    vs
    1. Lens

common strengths of the Z90 and Slice

  • Larger than average screens: 3" vs 3.5"
  • Fairly small: Super compact (95×57×20 mm) vs Super compact (104×60×17 mm)
  • Have touch screens

Canon PowerShot SD980 IS

Canon PowerShot SD980 IS
4 months older
$180

Significant advantages of the SD980 IS (vs the Slice)

  • Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 35 mm
  • Much wider aperture: f/2.8 vs f/4.8
  • Much better macro capability: 3.0 cm vs 10.0 cm

Significant disadvantages of the SD980 IS (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"

common strengths of the SD980 IS and Slice

  • Larger than average screens: 3" vs 3.5"
  • Fairly small: Super compact (100×53×23 mm) vs Super compact (104×60×17 mm)
  • Good image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs
    1. Lens

Nikon Coolpix P340

Nikon Coolpix P340
4 years newer
$334

Significant advantages of the P340 (vs the Slice)

  • Much wider aperture: f/1.8 vs f/4.8
  • Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 35 mm
  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs 848 x 480 @ 30fps

Significant disadvantages of the P340 (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen
  • Significantly larger: Compact (103×58×32 mm) vs Super compact (104×60×17 mm)

common strengths of the P340 and Slice

  • Larger than average screens: 3" vs 3.5"
  • Good image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs
    1. Lens

Nikon Coolpix P310

Nikon Coolpix P310
2 years newer
$398

Significant advantages of the P310 (vs the Slice)

  • Much wider aperture: f/1.8 vs f/4.8
  • Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 35 mm
  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs 848 x 480 @ 30fps

Significant disadvantages of the P310 (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen
  • Significantly larger: Compact (103×58×32 mm) vs Super compact (104×60×17 mm)

common strengths of the P310 and Slice

  • Larger than average screens: 3" vs 3.5"
  • Good image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs
    1. Lens

Canon ELPH 300 HS

Canon ELPH 300 HS
1 year newer
$295

Significant advantages of the 300 HS (vs the Slice)

  • Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 35 mm
  • Much wider aperture: f/2.7 vs f/4.8
  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 24fps vs 848 x 480 @ 30fps

Significant disadvantages of the 300 HS (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the 300 HS and Slice

  • Fairly small: Super compact (92×56×20 mm) vs Super compact (104×60×17 mm)
  • Good image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs
    1. Lens
  • Thin: 0.8" vs 0.7"

Canon ELPH 320 HS

Canon PowerShot ELPH 320 HS
2 years newer
$220

Significant advantages of the 320 HS (vs the Slice)

  • Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 35 mm
  • Much wider aperture: f/2.7 vs f/4.8
  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 24fps vs 848 x 480 @ 30fps

Significant disadvantages of the 320 HS (vs the Slice)

  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.2" vs 3.5"

common strengths of the 320 HS and Slice

  • Very large screens: 3.2" vs 3.5"
  • Fairly small: Super compact (94×57×21 mm) vs Super compact (104×60×17 mm)
  • Good image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs
    1. Lens

compared toUltra compact competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Kodak Slice compared to ultra compact competitors include: it has a much larger screen (3.5" vs 2.7"), has a touch screen and has a faster max shutter speed (1/2000 of a second vs 1/1200 of a second).

However, on average it has a much narrower aperture (f/4.8 vs f/3.2), records lower quality movies (848 x 480 @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps), has a much narrower wide angle lens (35 mm vs 28 mm), doesn't shoot as fast continuously (3 fps vs 10 fps) and has a CCD-family sensor (CCD vs CMOS).

Canon PowerShot SD1400 IS

Canon PowerShot SD1400 IS
similar age
$225

Significant advantages of the SD1400 IS (vs the Slice)

  • Much wider aperture: f/2.8 vs f/4.8
  • Much better wide angle: 28 mm vs 35 mm
  • Much better macro capability: 3.0 cm vs 10.0 cm

Significant disadvantages of the SD1400 IS (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen
  • Slower max shutter speed: 1/1500 of a second vs 1/2000 of a second

common strengths of the SD1400 IS and Slice

  • Built-in flashes
  • Very good image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs
    1. Lens
  • Very thin: 0.7" vs 0.7"

Canon PowerShot SD780 IS

Canon PowerShot SD780 IS
10 months older
$398

Significant advantages of the SD780 IS (vs the Slice)

  • Much wider aperture: f/3.2 vs f/4.8
  • Much better macro capability: 3.0 cm vs 10.0 cm
  • Better wide angle: 33 mm vs 35 mm

Significant disadvantages of the SD780 IS (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 2.5" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen
  • Slower max shutter speed: 1/1500 of a second vs 1/2000 of a second

common strengths of the SD780 IS and Slice

  • Built-in flashes
  • Very good image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs
    1. Lens
  • Very thin: 0.7" vs 0.7"

Sony Cybershot DSC-TX55

Sony Cybershot DSC-TX55
1 year newer
$467

Significant advantages of the DSC-TX55 (vs the Slice)

  • Much better wide angle: 26 mm vs 35 mm
  • Much wider aperture: f/3.5 vs f/4.8
  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs 848 x 480 @ 30fps

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-TX55 (vs the Slice)

  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.3" vs 3.5"

common strengths of the DSC-TX55 and Slice

  • Built-in flashes
  • Very large screens: 3.3" vs 3.5"
  • Very good image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs
    1. Lens

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX30

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX30
3 years newer
$188 - $198

Significant advantages of the DSC-TX30 (vs the Slice)

  • Much better wide angle: 26 mm vs 35 mm
  • Much wider aperture: f/3.5 vs f/4.8
  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 60fps vs 848 x 480 @ 30fps

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-TX30 (vs the Slice)

  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.3" vs 3.5"

common strengths of the DSC-TX30 and Slice

  • Built-in flashes
  • Very large screens: 3.3" vs 3.5"
  • Very good image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs
    1. Lens

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX20

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX20
2 years newer
$200

Significant advantages of the DSC-TX20 (vs the Slice)

  • Much better wide angle: 25 mm vs 35 mm
  • Much wider aperture: f/3.5 vs f/4.8
  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 60fps vs 848 x 480 @ 30fps

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-TX20 (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"

common strengths of the DSC-TX20 and Slice

  • Built-in flashes
  • Larger than average screens: 3" vs 3.5"
  • Very good image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs
    1. Lens

Kodak EasyShare M590

Kodak EasyShare M590
7 months newer
$119

Significant advantages of the M590 (vs the Slice)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the M590 (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen
  • Much slower max shutter speed: 1/1200 of a second vs 1/2000 of a second

common strengths of the M590 and Slice

  • Built-in flashes
  • Very good image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs
    1. Lens
  • Very thin: 0.6" vs 0.7"

compared toEntry-level DSLR competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Kodak Slice compared to entry-level DSLR competitors include: it has a much larger screen (3.5" vs 3"), has image stabilization (lens vs none), has a touch screen, is much smaller (super compact (104×60×17 mm) vs professional size (133×100×79 mm)) and is significantly less expensive ($199.00 vs $749.00).

However, on average it records lower quality movies (848 x 480 @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps), takes much lower resolution photos (9.7 MP vs 24 MP), slightly lower maximum light sensitivity (3,200 ISO vs 25,600 ISO), doesn't record movies in 24p and doesn't shoot as fast continuously (3 fps vs 5 fps).

Canon Rebel T5i

Canon Rebel T5i
3 years newer
$465 - $650 (body only)
$589 - $650 18-55mm lens

Significant advantages of the T5i (vs the Slice)

  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs 848 x 480 @ 30fps
  • Has a viewfinder: Pentamirror vs None
  • Supports 24p

Significant disadvantages of the T5i (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • Much larger: Professional size (133×100×79 mm) vs Super compact (104×60×17 mm)
  • No image stabilization: None vs
    1. Lens

common strengths of the T5i and Slice

  • Have touch screens

Canon EOS Rebel T6i

Canon EOS Rebel T6i
5 years newer
$749 - $750 (body only)
$1,049 18-135mm lens

Significant advantages of the T6i (vs the Slice)

  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs 848 x 480 @ 30fps
  • Has a viewfinder: Pentamirror vs None
  • Supports 24p

Significant disadvantages of the T6i (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • Much larger: Professional size (132×101×78 mm) vs Super compact (104×60×17 mm)
  • Much thicker: 3.1" vs 0.7"

common strengths of the T6i and Slice

  • Have touch screens

Canon Rebel T3i

Canon Rebel T3i
1 year newer
$479 (body only)
$566 18-55mm lens

Significant advantages of the T3i (vs the Slice)

  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs 848 x 480 @ 30fps
  • Has a viewfinder: Pentamirror vs None
  • Supports 24p

Significant disadvantages of the T3i (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • Much larger: Professional size (133×100×80 mm) vs Super compact (104×60×17 mm)
  • No image stabilization: None vs
    1. Lens

common strengths of the T3i and Slice

  • None found

compared toTravel zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Kodak Slice compared to travel zoom competitors include: it has a much larger screen (3.5" vs 2.7"), is slightly smaller (super compact (104×60×17 mm) vs compact (105×59×28 mm)), has a touch screen and is thinner (0.7" vs 1.1").

However, on average it has significantly less zoom (5x vs 20x), has a much narrower wide angle lens (35 mm vs 25 mm), has a much narrower aperture (f/4.8 vs f/3.3), doesn't have a built-in GPS and records lower quality movies (848 x 480 @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps).

Canon PowerShot ELPH 140 IS

Canon PowerShot ELPH 140 IS
4 years newer
$150

Significant advantages of the ELPH 140 IS (vs the Slice)

  • Much better wide angle: 28 mm vs 35 mm
  • Much wider aperture: f/3.2 vs f/4.8
  • Much better macro capability: 1.0 cm vs 10.0 cm

Significant disadvantages of the ELPH 140 IS (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the ELPH 140 IS and Slice

  • Very small: Super compact (95×54×22 mm) vs Super compact (104×60×17 mm)
  • Thin: 0.9" vs 0.7"
  • Light weight: 130 g vs 158 g

Panasonic Lumix ZS30

Panasonic Lumix ZS30
3 years newer
$407

Significant advantages of the ZS30 (vs the Slice)

  • Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 35 mm
  • Has a GPS
  • Much wider aperture: f/3.3 vs f/4.8

Significant disadvantages of the ZS30 (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • Significantly larger: Compact (105×59×28 mm) vs Super compact (104×60×17 mm)
  • Significantly thicker: 1.1" vs 0.7"

common strengths of the ZS30 and Slice

  • Have touch screens

Panasonic Lumix ZS25

Panasonic Lumix ZS25
3 years newer
$376

Significant advantages of the ZS25 (vs the Slice)

  • Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 35 mm
  • Much wider aperture: f/3.3 vs f/4.8
  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 60fps vs 848 x 480 @ 30fps

Significant disadvantages of the ZS25 (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen
  • Significantly larger: Compact (105×59×28 mm) vs Super compact (104×60×17 mm)

common strengths of the ZS25 and Slice

  • None found

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH20

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH20
similar age

Significant advantages of the DMC-FH20 (vs the Slice)

  • Much better wide angle: 28 mm vs 35 mm
  • Much wider aperture: f/3.3 vs f/4.8
  • Much better macro capability: 5.0 cm vs 10.0 cm

Significant disadvantages of the DMC-FH20 (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen
  • Larger: Compact (100×56×28 mm) vs Super compact (104×60×17 mm)

common strengths of the DMC-FH20 and Slice

  • Fairly small: Compact (100×56×28 mm) vs Super compact (104×60×17 mm)

Canon PowerShot ELPH 130 IS

Canon PowerShot ELPH 130 IS
3 years newer
$237

Significant advantages of the ELPH 130 IS (vs the Slice)

  • Much better wide angle: 28 mm vs 35 mm
  • Much wider aperture: f/3.2 vs f/4.8
  • Much better macro capability: 1.0 cm vs 10.0 cm

Significant disadvantages of the ELPH 130 IS (vs the Slice)

  • None found

common strengths of the ELPH 130 IS and Slice

  • Very small: Super compact (95×56×21 mm) vs Super compact (104×60×17 mm)
  • Thin: 0.8" vs 0.7"
  • Light weight: 133 g vs 158 g

Nikon Coolpix S9700

Nikon Coolpix S9700
4 years newer
$197

Significant advantages of the S9700 (vs the Slice)

  • Much better wide angle: 25 mm vs 35 mm
  • Much more zoom: 30x vs 5x
  • Has a GPS

Significant disadvantages of the S9700 (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • Much larger: Compact (110×64×35 mm) vs Super compact (104×60×17 mm)
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the S9700 and Slice

  • None found

compared toSuper zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Kodak Slice compared to super zoom competitors include: it has a much larger screen (3.5" vs 3"), is significantly smaller (super compact (104×60×17 mm) vs prosumer size (111×76×91 mm)), has a touch screen, is thinner (0.7" vs 3.6") and is significantly lighter (158 g vs 508 g).

However, on average it has a much narrower aperture (f/4.8 vs f/3), has slightly less zoom (5x vs 34.8x), records lower quality movies (848 x 480 @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps), has a much narrower wide angle lens (35 mm vs 22 mm) and doesn't record high-speed movies (none vs 240 fps).

Nikon Coolpix L830

Nikon Coolpix L830
4 years newer
$159

Significant advantages of the L830 (vs the Slice)

  • Much wider aperture: f/3 vs f/4.8
  • Much better wide angle: 22 mm vs 35 mm
  • Much better macro capability: 1.0 cm vs 10.0 cm

Significant disadvantages of the L830 (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen
  • Significantly larger: Prosumer size (111×76×91 mm) vs Super compact (104×60×17 mm)

common strengths of the L830 and Slice

  • Fairly small: Prosumer size (111×76×91 mm) vs Super compact (104×60×17 mm)
  • Inexpensive: $159.00 vs $199.00

Kodak EashShare Z5120

Kodak EasyShare Z5120
2 years newer

Significant advantages of the Z5120 (vs the Slice)

  • Much wider aperture: f/3.1 vs f/4.8
  • Much better wide angle: 26 mm vs 35 mm
  • Can create panoramas in-camera

Significant disadvantages of the Z5120 (vs the Slice)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen
  • Significantly larger: Prosumer size (117×79×76 mm) vs Super compact (104×60×17 mm)

common strengths of the Z5120 and Slice

  • Fairly small: Prosumer size (117×79×76 mm) vs Super compact (104×60×17 mm)
  • Thin: 3" vs 0.7"