Kodak Slice Competitors

As well as being compared against other compacts, the Kodak Slice is also often compared to entry-level DSLRs, travel zooms, ultra compacts and super zooms. The Kodak Slice's top rivals come from Canon (such as the Rebel T3i and the ELPH 320 HS) and Panasonic (such as the Lumix ZS25 and the Lumix ZS20)

Generally, some of the advantages of the Kodak Slice compared to other compact competitors include: it has a slightly larger screen (3.5" vs 3.2").

However, on average it has a much narrower aperture (f/4.8 vs f/2.8), records lower quality movies (848 x 480 @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 24fps), has a significantly narrower wide angle lens (35 mm vs 24 mm), doesn't record high-speed movies (none vs 240 fps) and doesn't record movies in 24p.

Canon ELPH 320 HS 2 years newer $160 - $250	Significant advantages of the 320 HS (vs the Slice) Much wider aperture: f/2.7 vs f/4.8 Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 35 mm Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 24fps vs 848 x 480 @ 30fps Significant disadvantages of the 320 HS (vs the Slice) None found common strengths of the 320 HS and Slice Larger than average screens: 3.2" vs 3.5" Fairly small: Super compact 94x57x21 mm vs Super compact 104x60x17 mm Good image stabilization: Lens vs Lens
	Compare the Canon PowerShot ELPH 320 HS vs the Kodak Slice
Canon PowerShot ELPH 110 HS 2 years newer $215	Significant advantages of the ELPH 110 HS (vs the Slice) Much wider aperture: f/2.7 vs f/4.8 Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 35 mm Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 24fps vs 848 x 480 @ 30fps Significant disadvantages of the ELPH 110 HS (vs the Slice) Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5" No touch screen common strengths of the ELPH 110 HS and Slice Fairly small: Super compact 93x57x20 mm vs Super compact 104x60x17 mm Good image stabilization: Lens vs Lens Thin: 0.8" vs 0.7"
	Compare the Canon PowerShot ELPH 110 HS vs the Kodak Slice
Nikon Coolpix S80 8 months newer $338	Significant advantages of the S80 (vs the Slice) Significantly wider aperture: f/3.6 vs f/4.8 Has an OLED screen: OLED vs LCD Supports 24p Significant disadvantages of the S80 (vs the Slice) None found common strengths of the S80 and Slice Very large screens: 3.5" vs 3.5" Fairly small: Super compact 99x63x17 mm vs Super compact 104x60x17 mm Good image stabilization: Lens vs Lens
	Compare the Nikon Coolpix S80 vs the Kodak Slice
Nikon Coolpix S70 5 months older	Significant advantages of the S70 (vs the Slice) Significantly wider aperture: f/3.9 vs f/4.8 Significantly better wide angle: 28 mm vs 35 mm Has an OLED screen: OLED vs LCD Significant disadvantages of the S70 (vs the Slice) None found common strengths of the S70 and Slice Very large screens: 3.5" vs 3.5" Fairly small: Super compact 97x61x20 mm vs Super compact 104x60x17 mm Good image stabilization: Lens vs Lens
	Compare the Nikon Coolpix S70 vs the Kodak Slice
Fujifilm FinePix Z90 1 year newer	Significant advantages of the Z90 (vs the Slice) Significantly wider aperture: f/3.9 vs f/4.8 Significantly better wide angle: 28 mm vs 35 mm Significant disadvantages of the Z90 (vs the Slice) Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5" Worse image stabilization: Digital vs Lens common strengths of the Z90 and Slice Fairly small: Super compact 95x56x20 mm vs Super compact 104x60x17 mm Have touch screens Thin: 0.8" vs 0.7"
	Compare the Fujifilm FinePix Z90 vs the Kodak Slice
Canon PowerShot SD3500 IS similar age	Significant advantages of the SD3500 IS (vs the Slice) Much wider aperture: f/2.8 vs f/4.8 Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 35 mm Much better macro capability: 3 cm vs 10 cm Significant disadvantages of the SD3500 IS (vs the Slice) None found common strengths of the SD3500 IS and Slice Very large screens: 3.5" vs 3.5" Fairly small: Super compact 99x56x22 mm vs Super compact 104x60x17 mm Good image stabilization: Lens vs Lens
	Compare the Canon PowerShot SD3500 IS vs the Kodak Slice

Generally, some of the advantages of the Kodak Slice compared to entry-level DSLR competitors include: it has a much larger screen (3.5" vs 3.0"), has image stabilization (lens vs none), has a touch screen, is much smaller (super compact 104x60x17 mm vs professional size 133x99x79 mm) and is thinner (0.7" vs 3.1").

However, on average it records lower quality movies (848 x 480 @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps), takes much lower resolution photos (9.7 MP vs 17.9 MP), doesn't record movies in 24p, doesn't shoot as fast continuously (3 fps vs 5 fps) and doesn't have a screen which flips out.

Canon Rebel T3i 1 year newer $499 - $774 (body only) $200 - $617 18-55mm lens	Significant advantages of the T3i (vs the Slice) Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs 848 x 480 @ 30fps Much larger sensor: APS-C 22.3x14.9mm vs 1/2.3" 6.2x4.6mm Has a viewfinder: Pentamirror vs None Significant disadvantages of the T3i (vs the Slice) Much smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5" Much larger: Professional size 133x99x79 mm vs Super compact 104x60x17 mm No image stabilization: None vs Lens common strengths of the T3i and Slice None found
	Compare the Canon Rebel T3i vs the Kodak Slice
Canon Rebel T4i 2 years newer $609 (body only) $200 - $660 18-55mm lens	Significant advantages of the T4i (vs the Slice) Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs 848 x 480 @ 30fps Much larger sensor: APS-C 22.3x14.9mm vs 1/2.3" 6.2x4.6mm Has a viewfinder: Pentamirror vs None Significant disadvantages of the T4i (vs the Slice) Much smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5" Much larger: Professional size 133x99x78 mm vs Super compact 104x60x17 mm No image stabilization: None vs Lens common strengths of the T4i and Slice Have touch screens
	Compare the Canon Rebel T4i vs the Kodak Slice
Canon Rebel T5i 3 years newer $599 (body only) $200 - $749 18-55mm lens	Significant advantages of the T5i (vs the Slice) Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs 848 x 480 @ 30fps Much larger sensor: APS-C 22.3x14.9mm vs 1/2.3" 6.2x4.6mm Has a viewfinder: Pentamirror vs None Significant disadvantages of the T5i (vs the Slice) Much smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5" Much larger: Professional size 133x100x79 mm vs Super compact 104x60x17 mm No image stabilization: None vs Lens common strengths of the T5i and Slice Have touch screens
	Compare the Canon Rebel T5i vs the Kodak Slice

Generally, some of the advantages of the Kodak Slice compared to travel zoom competitors include: it has a significantly larger screen (3.5" vs 3.0") and has a touch screen.

However, on average it has a much narrower wide angle lens (35 mm vs 24 mm), has a much narrower aperture (f/4.8 vs f/3.3), doesn't have a built-in GPS, records lower quality movies (848 x 480 @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps) and doesn't record high-speed movies (none vs 220 fps).

Panasonic Lumix ZS25 3 years newer $210 - $220	Significant advantages of the ZS25 (vs the Slice) Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 35 mm Much wider aperture: f/3.3 vs f/4.8 Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 60fps vs 848 x 480 @ 30fps Significant disadvantages of the ZS25 (vs the Slice) Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5" No touch screen common strengths of the ZS25 and Slice None found
	Compare the Panasonic Lumix ZS25 vs the Kodak Slice
Panasonic Lumix ZS20 2 years newer $280 - $399	Significant advantages of the ZS20 (vs the Slice) Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 35 mm Has a GPS Much wider aperture: f/3.3 vs f/4.8 Significant disadvantages of the ZS20 (vs the Slice) Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5" common strengths of the ZS20 and Slice Have touch screens
	Compare the Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS20 vs the Kodak Slice
Olympus SZ10 1 year newer $276	Significant advantages of the SZ10 (vs the Slice) Much wider aperture: f/3.1 vs f/4.8 Much better wide angle: 28 mm vs 35 mm Much better macro capability: 1 cm vs 10 cm Significant disadvantages of the SZ10 (vs the Slice) Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5" No touch screen common strengths of the SZ10 and Slice None found
	Compare the Olympus SZ-10 vs the Kodak Slice
Panasonic Lumix ZS30 3 years newer $329	Significant advantages of the ZS30 (vs the Slice) Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 35 mm Has a GPS Much wider aperture: f/3.3 vs f/4.8 Significant disadvantages of the ZS30 (vs the Slice) Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5" common strengths of the ZS30 and Slice Have touch screens
	Compare the Panasonic Lumix ZS30 vs the Kodak Slice
Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS10 1 year newer $230 - $300	Significant advantages of the DMC-ZS10 (vs the Slice) Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 35 mm Has a GPS Much wider aperture: f/3.3 vs f/4.8 Significant disadvantages of the DMC-ZS10 (vs the Slice) Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5" common strengths of the DMC-ZS10 and Slice Have touch screens
	Compare the Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS10 vs the Kodak Slice
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX300 3 years newer $223 - $328	Significant advantages of the DSC-WX300 (vs the Slice) Much better wide angle: 25 mm vs 35 mm Much wider aperture: f/3.5 vs f/4.8 Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 60fps vs 848 x 480 @ 30fps Significant disadvantages of the DSC-WX300 (vs the Slice) Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5" No touch screen common strengths of the DSC-WX300 and Slice None found
	Compare the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX300 vs the Kodak Slice

Generally, some of the advantages of the Kodak Slice compared to ultra compact competitors include: it has a significantly larger screen (3.5" vs 3.0") and has a touch screen.

However, on average it has a much narrower aperture (f/4.8 vs f/3.2), records lower quality movies (848 x 480 @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 60fps), has a slightly narrower wide angle lens (35 mm vs 26 mm), has a CCD-family sensor (CCD vs CMOS) and doesn't have an OLED screen (LCD vs OLED).

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX200V 2 years newer $239	Significant advantages of the DSC-TX200V (vs the Slice) Much wider aperture: f/3.5 vs f/4.8 Much better wide angle: 26 mm vs 35 mm Has an OLED screen: OLED vs LCD Significant disadvantages of the DSC-TX200V (vs the Slice) None found common strengths of the DSC-TX200V and Slice Each has a built-in flash Very large screens: 3.3" vs 3.5" Good image stabilization: Lens vs Lens
	Compare the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX200V vs the Kodak Slice
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX1 5 months older $188	Significant advantages of the DSC-TX1 (vs the Slice) Much wider aperture: f/3.5 vs f/4.8 Much better macro capability: 1 cm vs 10 cm Has a CMOS-family sensor: CMOS vs CCD Significant disadvantages of the DSC-TX1 (vs the Slice) Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5" common strengths of the DSC-TX1 and Slice Each has a built-in flash Larger than average screens: 3.0" vs 3.5" Good image stabilization: Lens vs Lens
	Compare the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX1 vs the Kodak Slice
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900 10 months older	Significant advantages of the DSC-T900 (vs the Slice) Much wider aperture: f/3.5 vs f/4.8 Significant disadvantages of the DSC-T900 (vs the Slice) No touch screen common strengths of the DSC-T900 and Slice Each has a built-in flash Very large screens: 3.5" vs 3.5" Good image stabilization: Lens vs Lens
	Compare the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900 vs the Kodak Slice
Kodak EasyShare M590 7 months newer	Significant advantages of the M590 (vs the Slice) None found Significant disadvantages of the M590 (vs the Slice) Much smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.5" No touch screen common strengths of the M590 and Slice Each has a built-in flash Good image stabilization: Lens vs Lens Thin: 0.6" vs 0.7"
	Compare the EasyShare M590 vs the Slice
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX30 3 years newer $198 - $298	Significant advantages of the DSC-TX30 (vs the Slice) Much wider aperture: f/3.5 vs f/4.8 Much better wide angle: 26 mm vs 35 mm Has an OLED screen: OLED vs LCD Significant disadvantages of the DSC-TX30 (vs the Slice) None found common strengths of the DSC-TX30 and Slice Each has a built-in flash Very large screens: 3.3" vs 3.5" Good image stabilization: Lens vs Lens
	Compare the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX30 vs the Kodak Slice
Nikon Coolpix S3100 1 year newer	Significant advantages of the S3100 (vs the Slice) Much wider aperture: f/3.2 vs f/4.8 Much better wide angle: 26 mm vs 35 mm Can create panoramas in-camera Significant disadvantages of the S3100 (vs the Slice) Much smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.5" No touch screen common strengths of the S3100 and Slice Each has a built-in flash Good image stabilization: Sensor shift vs Lens Thin: 0.7" vs 0.7"
	Compare the Nikon Coolpix S3100 vs the Kodak Slice

Generally, some of the advantages of the Kodak Slice compared to super zoom competitors include: it has a significantly larger screen (3.5" vs 3.0"), is significantly smaller (super compact 104x60x17 mm vs prosumer size 118x85x97 mm), has a touch screen, is thinner (0.7" vs 3.8") and is significantly lighter (158 g vs 551 g).

However, on average it has a much narrower aperture (f/4.8 vs f/2.9), has much less zoom (5x vs 52x), records lower quality movies (848 x 480 @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps), has a much narrower wide angle lens (35 mm vs 22 mm) and doesn't record high-speed movies (none vs 240 fps).

Nikon Coolpix L830 4 years newer $227 - $255	Significant advantages of the L830 (vs the Slice) Much wider aperture: f/3.0 vs f/4.8 Much better wide angle: 22 mm vs 35 mm Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs 848 x 480 @ 30fps Significant disadvantages of the L830 (vs the Slice) Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5" Significantly larger: Prosumer size 111x75x91 mm vs Super compact 104x60x17 mm No touch screen common strengths of the L830 and Slice Fairly small: Prosumer size 111x75x91 mm vs Super compact 104x60x17 mm
	Compare the Nikon Coolpix L830 vs the Kodak Slice
Nikon Coolpix P530 4 years newer $347 - $397	Significant advantages of the P530 (vs the Slice) Much wider aperture: f/3.0 vs f/4.8 Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 35 mm Significantly more zoom: 41.7x vs 5x Significant disadvantages of the P530 (vs the Slice) Much larger: Professional size 122x84x98 mm vs Super compact 104x60x17 mm Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5" No touch screen common strengths of the P530 and Slice None found
	Compare the Nikon Coolpix P530 vs the Kodak Slice
Kodak PixPro AZ521 3 years newer $220	Significant advantages of the AZ521 (vs the Slice) Much wider aperture: f/2.9 vs f/4.8 Much more zoom: 52x vs 5x Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 35 mm Significant disadvantages of the AZ521 (vs the Slice) Much larger: Prosumer size 118x85x97 mm vs Super compact 104x60x17 mm Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5" No touch screen common strengths of the AZ521 and Slice None found
	Compare the PixPro AZ521 vs the Slice