As well as being compared against other travel zooms, the Kodak EasyShare M580 is also often compared to waterproofs, super zooms and compacts. The Kodak EasyShare M580's top rivals come from Kodak (such as the EasyShare Z950 and the EasyShare M532) and Nikon (such as the Coolpix P520 and the Coolpix S33)

compared toTravel zoom competitors

Generally, compared to other travel zoom competitors the Kodak M580 doesn't have a built-in GPS, has a much smaller screen (3" vs 4.8"), has a slightly lower resolution screen (230k dots vs 461k dots), doesn't record high-speed movies (none vs 120 fps) and doesn't shoot as fast continuously (3 fps vs 8.7 fps).

Kodak EasyShare Z950

Kodak EasyShare Z950
5 months older
$247

Significant advantages of the Z950 (vs the M580)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the Z950 (vs the M580)

  • Significantly worse wide angle: 35 mm vs 28 mm

common strengths of the Z950 and M580

  • None found

Samsung Galaxy Camera

Samsung Galaxy Camera
2 years newer
$77

Significant advantages of the Camera (vs the M580)

  • Much larger screen: 4.8" vs 3"
  • Has a GPS
  • Has a CMOS-family sensor: CMOS vs CCD

Significant disadvantages of the Camera (vs the M580)

  • None found

common strengths of the Camera and M580

  • None found

Canon ELPH 310 HS

Canon ELPH 310 HS
1 year newer
$240

Significant advantages of the 310 HS (vs the M580)

  • Records high-speed movies: 240 fps vs None
  • Has a CMOS-family sensor: CMOS vs CCD
  • Supports 24p

Significant disadvantages of the 310 HS (vs the M580)

  • None found

common strengths of the 310 HS and M580

  • None found

Sony Cybershot WX60

Sony Cybershot WX60
3 years newer
$255

Significant advantages of the WX60 (vs the M580)

  • Has a CMOS-family sensor: CMOS vs CCD

Significant disadvantages of the WX60 (vs the M580)

  • Much smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3"

common strengths of the WX60 and M580

  • None found

Nikon Coolpix S9900

Nikon Coolpix S9900
5 years newer
$259

Significant advantages of the S9900 (vs the M580)

  • Has a GPS
  • Has a CMOS-family sensor: CMOS vs CCD
  • Much higher resolution screen: 921k dots vs 230k dots

Significant disadvantages of the S9900 (vs the M580)

  • None found

common strengths of the S9900 and M580

  • None found

Fujifilm FinePix F80EXR

Fujifilm FinePix F80EXR
similar age
$400

Significant advantages of the F80EXR (vs the M580)

  • Significantly faster max shutter speed: 1/2000 of a second vs 1/1400 of a second

Significant disadvantages of the F80EXR (vs the M580)

  • None found

common strengths of the F80EXR and M580

  • None found

compared toWaterproof competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Kodak M580 compared to waterproof competitors include: it has a slightly wider wide angle lens (28 mm vs 30 mm), has a significantly larger screen (3" vs 2.7"), is slightly smaller (compact (101×60×26 mm) vs compact (110×66×27 mm)) and is slightly lighter (150 g vs 221 g).

However, on average it has a CCD-family sensor (CCD vs CMOS), is older (january 2010 vs february 2015), doesn't have a built-in GPS, is slightly more expensive ($299.95 vs $102.11) and is not waterproof.

Fujifilm FinePix XP30

Fujifilm FinePix XP30
1 year newer
$170

Significant advantages of the XP30 (vs the M580)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the XP30 (vs the M580)

  • None found

common strengths of the XP30 and M580

  • None found

Nikon Coolpix S33

Nikon Coolpix S33
5 years newer
$102

Significant advantages of the S33 (vs the M580)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the S33 (vs the M580)

  • None found

common strengths of the S33 and M580

  • None found

compared toSuper zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Kodak M580 compared to super zoom competitors include: it is significantly smaller (compact (101×60×26 mm) vs professional size (125×84×102 mm)), is thinner (1" vs 4") and is significantly lighter (150 g vs 550 g).

However, on average it has significantly less zoom (8x vs 41.7x), has a slightly narrower wide angle lens (28 mm vs 24 mm), has a significantly smaller screen (3" vs 3.2"), has a much lower resolution screen (230k dots vs 921k dots) and doesn't record high-speed movies (none vs 120 fps).

Nikon Coolpix P520

Nikon Coolpix P520
3 years newer
$360

Significant advantages of the P520 (vs the M580)

  • Records high-speed movies: 120 fps vs None
  • Has a CMOS-family sensor: CMOS vs CCD
  • Much higher resolution screen: 921k dots vs 230k dots

Significant disadvantages of the P520 (vs the M580)

  • Significantly larger: Professional size (125×84×102 mm) vs Compact (101×60×26 mm)
  • Significantly thicker: 4" vs 1"
  • Significantly heavier: 550 g vs 150 g

common strengths of the P520 and M580

  • Light weight: 550 g vs 150 g

compared toCompact competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Kodak M580 compared to compact competitors include: it has a much wider wide angle lens (28 mm vs 35 mm) and has a significantly larger screen (3" vs 2.7").

However, on average it is slightly larger (compact (101×60×26 mm) vs super compact (96×59×19 mm)), doesn't record high-speed movies (none vs 240 fps), is thicker (1" vs 0.8"), is slightly more expensive ($299.95 vs $107.02) and has a slower max shutter speed (1/1400 of a second vs 1/2000 of a second).

Kodak EasyShare M532

Kodak EasyShare M532
1 year newer
$107

Significant advantages of the M532 (vs the M580)

  • Smaller: Super compact (94×56×20 mm) vs Compact (101×60×26 mm)
  • Significantly faster max shutter speed: 1/1600 of a second vs 1/1400 of a second

Significant disadvantages of the M532 (vs the M580)

  • Significantly smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3"

common strengths of the M532 and M580

  • Fairly small: Super compact (94×56×20 mm) vs Compact (101×60×26 mm)
  • Light weight: 130 g vs 150 g

Kodak EasyShare M530

Kodak EasyShare M530
similar age
$130

Significant advantages of the M530 (vs the M580)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the M530 (vs the M580)

  • Much worse wide angle: 36 mm vs 28 mm
  • Significantly smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3"

common strengths of the M530 and M580

  • Fairly small: Super compact (94×57×23 mm) vs Compact (101×60×26 mm)
  • Light weight: 150 g vs 150 g

Kodak EasyShare V1273

Kodak EasyShare V1273
2 years older

Significant advantages of the V1273 (vs the M580)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the V1273 (vs the M580)

  • Much worse wide angle: 37 mm vs 28 mm
  • Much slower max shutter speed: 1/1164 of a second vs 1/1400 of a second

common strengths of the V1273 and M580

  • Fairly small: Super compact (93×58×21 mm) vs Compact (101×60×26 mm)
  • Larger than average screens: 3" vs 3"

Kodak EasyShare M340

Kodak EasyShare M340
1 year older
$149

Significant advantages of the M340 (vs the M580)

  • Much faster max shutter speed: 1/4000 of a second vs 1/1400 of a second

Significant disadvantages of the M340 (vs the M580)

  • Much worse wide angle: 35 mm vs 28 mm
  • Significantly smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3"

common strengths of the M340 and M580

  • Fairly small: Super compact (96×59×19 mm) vs Compact (101×60×26 mm)
  • Light weight: 115 g vs 150 g

Canon ELPH 300 HS

Canon ELPH 300 HS
1 year newer
$130

Significant advantages of the 300 HS (vs the M580)

  • Records high-speed movies: 240 fps vs None
  • Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 28 mm
  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 24fps vs 720p @ 30fps

Significant disadvantages of the 300 HS (vs the M580)

  • Significantly smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3"

common strengths of the 300 HS and M580

  • Fairly small: Super compact (92×56×20 mm) vs Compact (101×60×26 mm)
  • Light weight: 141 g vs 150 g