As well as being compared against other travel zooms, the Kodak EasyShare M580 is also often compared to waterproofs and compacts. The Kodak EasyShare M580's top rivals come from Nikon (such as the Coolpix S9900 and the Coolpix S33) and Kodak (such as the EasyShare M532)

compared toTravel zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Kodak M580 compared to other travel zoom competitors include: it has a significantly larger screen (3" vs 2.7").

However, on average it has a slightly narrower wide angle lens (28 mm vs 25 mm), doesn't have a built-in GPS, has a significantly lower resolution screen (230k dots vs 921k dots), doesn't have a screen which flips out and has a CCD-family sensor (CCD vs CMOS).

Nikon Coolpix S9900

Nikon Coolpix S9900
5 years newer
$600

Significant advantages of the S9900 (vs the M580)

  • Has a GPS
  • Much higher resolution screen: 921k dots vs 230k dots
  • Significantly better wide angle: 25 mm vs 28 mm

Significant disadvantages of the S9900 (vs the M580)

  • None found

common strengths of the S9900 and M580

  • None found

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH25

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH25
1 year newer

Significant advantages of the DMC-FH25 (vs the M580)

  • Much longer exposures: 60 seconds vs 8 seconds

Significant disadvantages of the DMC-FH25 (vs the M580)

  • Much smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3"

common strengths of the DMC-FH25 and M580

  • None found

compared toWaterproof competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Kodak M580 compared to waterproof competitors include: it has a slightly wider wide angle lens (28 mm vs 30 mm), has a much larger screen (3" vs 2.7"), is much smaller (compact (101×60×26 mm) vs compact (110×66×27 mm)), takes slightly higher resolution photos (9.7 MP vs 5.7 MP) and is significantly lighter (150 g vs 221 g).

However, on average it has a CCD-family sensor (CCD vs CMOS), is older (january 2010 vs february 2015), is not waterproof and has a slower max shutter speed (1/1400 of a second vs 1/2000 of a second).

Nikon Coolpix S33

Nikon Coolpix S33
5 years newer
$150

Significant advantages of the S33 (vs the M580)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the S33 (vs the M580)

  • None found

common strengths of the S33 and M580

  • None found

compared toCompact competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Kodak M580 compared to compact competitors include: it has a much larger screen (3" vs 2.7").

However, on average it is much larger (compact (101×60×26 mm) vs super compact (94×56×20 mm)), is older (january 2010 vs february 2011), is thicker (1" vs 0.8") and has a slower max shutter speed (1/1400 of a second vs 1/1600 of a second).

Kodak EasyShare M532

Kodak EasyShare M532
1 year newer
$106

Significant advantages of the M532 (vs the M580)

  • Much smaller: Super compact (94×56×20 mm) vs Compact (101×60×26 mm)
  • Thinner: 0.8" vs 1"

Significant disadvantages of the M532 (vs the M580)

  • Much smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3"

common strengths of the M532 and M580

  • Very small: Super compact (94×56×20 mm) vs Compact (101×60×26 mm)
  • Very light: 130 g vs 150 g
  • Very thin: 0.8" vs 1"