As well as being compared against other compacts, the Kodak LS633 is also often compared to ultra compacts. The Kodak LS633's top rivals come from Olympus (such as the FE-4030) and Samsung (such as the Digimax i5)

Competitor classes

compared toCompact competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Kodak LS633 compared to other compact competitors include: it has a viewfinder (tunnel vs none).

However, on average it has a much narrower wide angle lens (37 mm vs 26 mm), has a slightly smaller screen (2.2" vs 2.7"), is significantly larger (compact (114×55×31 mm) vs super compact (92×56×22 mm)), is older (march 2003 vs january 2010) and is thicker (1.2" vs 0.9").

Olympus FE-4030

Olympus FE-4030
6 years newer
$125

Significant advantages of the FE-4030 (vs the LS633)

  • Much better wide angle: 26 mm vs 37 mm
  • Significantly smaller: Super compact (92×56×22 mm) vs Compact (114×55×31 mm)
  • Larger screen: 2.7" vs 2.2"

Significant disadvantages of the FE-4030 (vs the LS633)

  • No viewfinder: None vs Tunnel

common strengths of the FE-4030 and LS633

  • Wide aperture: f/2.6 vs f/2.7
  • Each has a built-in flash
  • Thin: 0.9" vs 1.2"

compared toUltra compact competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Kodak LS633 compared to ultra compact competitors include: it has a slightly wider aperture (f/2.7 vs f/3.5), has a slightly wider wide angle lens (37 mm vs 39 mm) and has a viewfinder (tunnel vs none).

However, on average it has a slightly smaller screen (2.2" vs 2.5"), is significantly larger (compact (114×55×31 mm) vs ultra compact (90×60×17 mm)), is older (march 2003 vs may 2005), is thicker (1.2" vs 0.7") and is significantly heavier (260 g vs 155 g).

Samsung Digimax i5

Samsung Digimax i5
2 years newer

Significant advantages of the i5 (vs the LS633)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the i5 (vs the LS633)

  • None found

common strengths of the i5 and LS633

  • None found