The Kodak EasyShare Z760 is mostly gets compared to compacts. The Kodak EasyShare Z760's top rivals come from Canon (such as the ELPH 320 HS)

compared toCompact competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Kodak Z760 compared to compact competitors include: it has a viewfinder (tunnel vs none) and much longer exposures (64 seconds vs 15 seconds).

However, on average it has a much narrower wide angle lens (39 mm vs 24 mm), has a much smaller screen (2.2" vs 3.2"), has a slightly lower resolution screen (153k dots vs 461k dots), is much larger (mid size (100×69×40 mm) vs super compact (94×57×21 mm)) and doesn't have image stabilization (none vs lens).

Canon ELPH 320 HS

Canon PowerShot ELPH 320 HS
6 years newer

Significant advantages of the 320 HS (vs the Z760)

  • Much smaller: Super compact (94×57×21 mm) vs Mid size (100×69×40 mm)
  • Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 39 mm
  • Much larger screen: 3.2" vs 2.2"

Significant disadvantages of the 320 HS (vs the Z760)

  • No viewfinder: None vs Tunnel
  • Much shorter max exposures: 15 seconds vs 64 seconds

common strengths of the 320 HS and Z760

  • Wide aperture: f/2.7 vs f/2.8