As well as being compared against other super zooms, the Kodak EasyShare Z710 is also often compared to travel zooms, digicams, pro digicams and compacts. The Kodak EasyShare Z710's top rivals come from Olympus (such as the SP-550 UZ and the SP-590 UZ) and Canon (such as the PowerShot SX160 IS and the PowerShot S200)

compared toSuper zoom competitors

Generally, compared to other super zoom competitors the Kodak Z710 has a much narrower wide angle lens (38 mm vs 28 mm), has a much smaller screen (2" vs 3"), has a slightly lower resolution screen (201k dots vs 460k dots), doesn't have image stabilization (none vs sensor shift) and doesn't shoot as fast continuously (1.7 fps vs 10 fps).

Olympus SP-550 UZ

Olympus SP-550 UZ
4 months newer

Significant advantages of the SP-550 UZ (vs the Z710)

  • Much better wide angle: 28 mm vs 38 mm
  • Image stabilization:
    1. Sensor shift
    vs None
  • Significantly larger screen: 2.5" vs 2"

Significant disadvantages of the SP-550 UZ (vs the Z710)

  • None found

common strengths of the SP-550 UZ and Z710

  • Very small: Prosumer size (116×79×78 mm) vs Standard size (98×78×73 mm)
  • Light weight: 460 g vs 360 g
  • Thin: 3.1" vs 2.9"

Fujifilm FinePix S1600

Fujifilm FinePix S1600
3 years newer

Significant advantages of the S1600 (vs the Z710)

  • Much better wide angle: 28 mm vs 38 mm
  • Image stabilization:
    1. Sensor shift
    vs None
  • Much larger screen: 3" vs 2"

Significant disadvantages of the S1600 (vs the Z710)

  • None found

common strengths of the S1600 and Z710

  • Very small: Prosumer size (110×73×81 mm) vs Standard size (98×78×73 mm)
  • Very light: 337 g vs 360 g
  • Thin: 3.2" vs 2.9"

Olympus SP-590 UZ

Olympus SP-590 UZ
2 years newer

Significant advantages of the SP-590 UZ (vs the Z710)

  • Much better wide angle: 26 mm vs 38 mm
  • Image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    2. Sensor shift
    vs None
  • Much larger screen: 2.7" vs 2"

Significant disadvantages of the SP-590 UZ (vs the Z710)

  • None found

common strengths of the SP-590 UZ and Z710

  • Fairly small: Prosumer size (116×84×81 mm) vs Standard size (98×78×73 mm)
  • Very light: 413 g vs 360 g
  • Thin: 3.2" vs 2.9"

Nikon Coolpix P500

Nikon Coolpix P500
4 years newer
$546

Significant advantages of the P500 (vs the Z710)

  • Much better wide angle: 23 mm vs 38 mm
  • Image stabilization:
    1. Sensor shift
    vs None
  • Much larger screen: 3" vs 2"

Significant disadvantages of the P500 (vs the Z710)

  • Significantly narrower aperture: f/3.5 vs f/2.8

common strengths of the P500 and Z710

  • Fairly small: Professional size (116×84×103 mm) vs Standard size (98×78×73 mm)
  • Light weight: 481 g vs 360 g
  • Thin: 4.1" vs 2.9"

Panasonic Lumix DMC-LZ30

Panasonic Lumix DMC-LZ30
6 years newer

Significant advantages of the DMC-LZ30 (vs the Z710)

  • Much better wide angle: 25 mm vs 38 mm
  • Image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs None
  • Much larger screen: 3" vs 2"

Significant disadvantages of the DMC-LZ30 (vs the Z710)

  • No viewfinder: None vs Digital

common strengths of the DMC-LZ30 and Z710

  • Fairly small: Prosumer size (124×84×91 mm) vs Standard size (98×78×73 mm)
  • Light weight: 558 g vs 360 g
  • Thin: 3.6" vs 2.9"

Kodak EasyShare Z650

Kodak EasyShare Z650
8 months older
$100

Significant advantages of the Z650 (vs the Z710)

  • Much faster max shutter speed: 1/1700 of a second vs 1/1000 of a second

Significant disadvantages of the Z650 (vs the Z710)

  • None found

common strengths of the Z650 and Z710

  • Very small: Standard size (98×78×73 mm) vs Standard size (98×78×73 mm)
  • Very light: 320 g vs 360 g
  • Very thin: 2.9" vs 2.9"

compared toTravel zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Kodak Z710 compared to travel zoom competitors include: it has a significantly wider aperture (f/2.8 vs f/3.5) and has a viewfinder (digital vs none).

However, on average it has a much narrower wide angle lens (38 mm vs 25 mm), has a much smaller screen (2" vs 3"), has a slightly lower resolution screen (201k dots vs 460k dots), doesn't have image stabilization (none vs lens) and takes slightly lower resolution photos (7.1 MP vs 9.8 MP).

Canon PowerShot SX160 IS

Canon PowerShot SX160 IS
5 years newer

Significant advantages of the SX160 IS (vs the Z710)

  • Much better wide angle: 28 mm vs 38 mm
  • Image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs None
  • Much larger screen: 3" vs 2"

Significant disadvantages of the SX160 IS (vs the Z710)

  • Significantly narrower aperture: f/3.5 vs f/2.8
  • No viewfinder: None vs Digital

common strengths of the SX160 IS and Z710

  • None found

Nikon Coolpix L620

Nikon Coolpix L620
6 years newer
$380

Significant advantages of the L620 (vs the Z710)

  • Much better wide angle: 25 mm vs 38 mm
  • Image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs None
  • Much larger screen: 3" vs 2"

Significant disadvantages of the L620 (vs the Z710)

  • Narrower aperture: f/3.3 vs f/2.8
  • No viewfinder: None vs Digital

common strengths of the L620 and Z710

  • None found

compared toDigicam competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Kodak Z710 compared to digicam competitors include: it has a slightly larger screen (2" vs 1.8"), takes slightly higher resolution photos (7.1 MP vs 2.1 MP), is newer (september 2006 vs june 1999) and has a faster max shutter speed (1/1000 of a second vs 1/755 of a second).

However, on average it has a much narrower wide angle lens (38 mm vs 30 mm).

Kodak DC280

Placeholder
7 years older

Significant advantages of the DC280 (vs the Z710)

  • Much better wide angle: 30 mm vs 38 mm

Significant disadvantages of the DC280 (vs the Z710)

  • Lower true resolution: 2.1 MP vs 7.1 MP
  • Much slower max shutter speed: 1/755 of a second vs 1/1000 of a second

common strengths of the DC280 and Z710

  • Wide aperture: f/3 vs f/2.8
  • Viewfinders: Tunnel vs Digital

compared toPro digicam competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Kodak Z710 compared to pro digicam competitors include: it has higher quality type of viewfinder (digital vs none).

However, on average it has a slightly narrower aperture (f/2.8 vs f/1.8), has a much narrower wide angle lens (38 mm vs 24 mm), has a much smaller screen (2" vs 3"), doesn't have image stabilization (none vs lens) and is older (september 2006 vs february 2014).

Canon PowerShot S200

Canon PowerShot S200
7 years newer
$232

Significant advantages of the S200 (vs the Z710)

  • Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 38 mm
  • Image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs None
  • Much wider aperture: f/1.8 vs f/2.8

Significant disadvantages of the S200 (vs the Z710)

  • No viewfinder: None vs Digital

common strengths of the S200 and Z710

  • Each has a built-in flash

Kodak EasyShare P880

Placeholder
1 year older

Significant advantages of the P880 (vs the Z710)

  • Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 38 mm
  • Significantly larger screen: 2.5" vs 2"
  • Supports an external flash

Significant disadvantages of the P880 (vs the Z710)

  • None found

common strengths of the P880 and Z710

  • Each has a built-in flash
  • Both have digital viewfinders: Digital vs Digital

compared toCompact competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Kodak Z710 compared to compact competitors include: it is newer (september 2006 vs february 2006).

However, on average it has a slightly narrower wide angle lens (38 mm vs 36 mm), has a slightly smaller screen (2" vs 2.4"), is much larger (standard size (98×78×73 mm) vs compact (92×66×32 mm)), is thicker (2.9" vs 1.3") and is much heavier (360 g vs 195 g).

Kodak EasyShare C643

Kodak EasyShare C643
7 months older

Significant advantages of the C643 (vs the Z710)

  • Much smaller: Compact (92×66×32 mm) vs Standard size (98×78×73 mm)
  • Much thinner: 1.3" vs 2.9"
  • Much lighter: 195 g vs 360 g

Significant disadvantages of the C643 (vs the Z710)

  • None found

common strengths of the C643 and Z710

  • Wide aperture: f/2.7 vs f/2.8
  • Each has a built-in flash
  • Viewfinders: Tunnel vs Digital