As well as being compared against other super zooms, the Kodak EasyShare Z650 is also often compared to travel zooms, pro digicams, compacts, ultra compacts and entry-level DSLRs. The Kodak EasyShare Z650's top rivals come from Canon (such as the PowerShot SX120 IS and the Powershot S100) and Sony (such as the Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 II and the Cyber-shot WX50)

compared toSuper zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Kodak Z650 compared to other super zoom competitors include: it is newer (january 2006 vs february 2005), is significantly less expensive ($99.99 vs $504.16) and has a faster max shutter speed (1/1700 of a second vs 1/1000 of a second).

However, on average it doesn't have image stabilization (none vs lens) and doesn't support an external flash.

Kodak EasyShare Z710

Kodak EasyShare Z710
8 months newer

Significant advantages of the Z710 (vs the Z650)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the Z710 (vs the Z650)

  • Much slower max shutter speed: 1/1000 of a second vs 1/1700 of a second

common strengths of the Z710 and Z650

  • Very small: Standard size (98×78×73 mm) vs Standard size (98×78×73 mm)
  • Very light: 360 g vs 320 g
  • Very thin: 2.9" vs 2.9"

Fujifilm FinePix S5200 Zoom

Fujifilm FinePix S5200 Zoom
5 months older

Significant advantages of the S5200 Zoom (vs the Z650)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the S5200 Zoom (vs the Z650)

  • None found

common strengths of the S5200 Zoom and Z650

  • Fairly small: Professional size (114×85×112 mm) vs Standard size (98×78×73 mm)
  • Light weight: 470 g vs 320 g
  • Thin: 4.4" vs 2.9"

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H1

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H1
10 months older
$504

Significant advantages of the DSC-H1 (vs the Z650)

  • Image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs None
  • Significantly larger screen: 2.5" vs 2"

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-H1 (vs the Z650)

  • Much slower max shutter speed: 1/1000 of a second vs 1/1700 of a second

common strengths of the DSC-H1 and Z650

  • Fairly small: Prosumer size (108×81×92 mm) vs Standard size (98×78×73 mm)
  • Light weight: 591 g vs 320 g
  • Thin: 3.6" vs 2.9"

Kodak DX7590

Placeholder
1 year older

Significant advantages of the DX7590 (vs the Z650)

  • Supports an external flash

Significant disadvantages of the DX7590 (vs the Z650)

  • Much slower max shutter speed: 1/1000 of a second vs 1/1700 of a second

common strengths of the DX7590 and Z650

  • Very small: Standard size (97×81×80 mm) vs Standard size (98×78×73 mm)
  • Very light: 400 g vs 320 g
  • Thin: 3.1" vs 2.9"

compared toTravel zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Kodak Z650 compared to travel zoom competitors include: it has a viewfinder (digital vs none).

However, on average it has a slightly narrower wide angle lens (38 mm vs 36 mm), has a much smaller screen (2" vs 3"), doesn't have image stabilization (none vs lens), takes slightly lower resolution photos (6.1 MP vs 8.6 MP) and is older (january 2006 vs august 2009).

Canon PowerShot SX120 IS

Canon PowerShot SX120 IS
3 years newer

Significant advantages of the SX120 IS (vs the Z650)

  • Image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs None
  • Much larger screen: 3" vs 2"
  • Significantly faster max shutter speed: 1/2500 of a second vs 1/1700 of a second

Significant disadvantages of the SX120 IS (vs the Z650)

  • No viewfinder: None vs Digital

common strengths of the SX120 IS and Z650

  • Wide aperture: f/2.8 vs f/2.8

compared toPro digicam competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Kodak Z650 compared to pro digicam competitors include: it is slightly less expensive ($99.99 vs $598.00) and has a viewfinder (digital vs none).

However, on average it has a significantly smaller sensor (1/2.5" 5.75x4.31mm vs 1" 13.2x8.8mm), has a slightly narrower aperture (f/2.8 vs f/1.8), has a much narrower wide angle lens (38 mm vs 24 mm), has a much smaller screen (2" vs 3") and is much larger (standard size (98×78×73 mm) vs compact (99×60×28 mm)).

Canon Powershot S100

Canon Powershot S100
5 years newer
$382

Significant advantages of the S100 (vs the Z650)

  • Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 38 mm
  • Much smaller: Compact (99×60×28 mm) vs Standard size (98×78×73 mm)
  • Image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs None

Significant disadvantages of the S100 (vs the Z650)

  • No viewfinder: None vs Digital

common strengths of the S100 and Z650

  • Inexpensive: $197.00 vs $99.99

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 II

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 II
7 years newer
$598

Significant advantages of the DSC-RX100 II (vs the Z650)

  • Much smaller: Compact (102×58×38 mm) vs Standard size (98×78×73 mm)
  • Much better wide angle: 28 mm vs 38 mm
  • Much larger sensor: 1" 13.2x8.8mm vs 1/2.5" 5.75x4.31mm

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-RX100 II (vs the Z650)

  • No viewfinder: None vs Digital

common strengths of the DSC-RX100 II and Z650

  • None found

compared toCompact competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Kodak Z650 compared to compact competitors include: it has higher quality type of viewfinder (digital vs none) and has a faster max shutter speed (1/1700 of a second vs 1/1000 of a second).

However, on average it has a significantly narrower wide angle lens (38 mm vs 28 mm), has a slightly smaller screen (2" vs 3"), is much larger (standard size (98×78×73 mm) vs compact (97×58×23 mm)), doesn't have image stabilization (none vs sensor shift) and is thicker (2.9" vs 0.9").

Casio Exilim EX-Z250

Casio Exilim EX-Z250
2 years newer

Significant advantages of the EX-Z250 (vs the Z650)

  • Much smaller: Compact (97×58×23 mm) vs Standard size (98×78×73 mm)
  • Much better wide angle: 28 mm vs 38 mm
  • Image stabilization:
    1. Sensor shift
    vs None

Significant disadvantages of the EX-Z250 (vs the Z650)

  • No viewfinder: None vs Digital

common strengths of the EX-Z250 and Z650

  • Wide aperture: f/2.6 vs f/2.8
  • Each has a built-in flash

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-P72

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-P72
2 years older

Significant advantages of the DSC-P72 (vs the Z650)

  • Much smaller: Compact (120×58×33 mm) vs Standard size (98×78×73 mm)
  • Much thinner: 1.3" vs 2.9"
  • Lighter: 259 g vs 320 g

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-P72 (vs the Z650)

  • Smaller screen: 1.5" vs 2"
  • Much slower max shutter speed: 1/1000 of a second vs 1/1700 of a second

common strengths of the DSC-P72 and Z650

  • Wide aperture: f/2.8 vs f/2.8
  • Each has a built-in flash
  • Viewfinders: Tunnel vs Digital

compared toUltra compact competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Kodak Z650 compared to ultra compact competitors include: it has a viewfinder (digital vs none).

However, on average it has a much narrower wide angle lens (38 mm vs 25 mm), has a significantly smaller screen (2" vs 2.7"), is much larger (standard size (98×78×73 mm) vs ultra compact (92×52×19 mm)), doesn't have image stabilization (none vs lens) and takes slightly lower resolution photos (6.1 MP vs 9.7 MP).

Sony Cyber-shot WX50

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX50
6 years newer
$120

Significant advantages of the WX50 (vs the Z650)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the WX50 (vs the Z650)

  • None found

common strengths of the WX50 and Z650

  • None found

compared toEntry-level DSLR competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Kodak Z650 compared to entry-level DSLR competitors include: it is much smaller (standard size (98×78×73 mm) vs professional size (133×100×80 mm)), is thinner (2.9" vs 3.1") and is significantly lighter (320 g vs 570 g).

However, on average it records lower quality movies (480p @ 11fps vs 1080p @ 30fps), has a much smaller screen (2" vs 3"), takes much lower resolution photos (6.1 MP vs 17.9 MP), doesn't record movies in 24p and doesn't shoot as fast continuously (3 fps vs 3.7 fps).

Canon Rebel T3i

Canon Rebel T3i
5 years newer

Significant advantages of the T3i (vs the Z650)

  • Much higher true resolution: 17.9 MP vs 6.1 MP
  • Much larger screen: 3" vs 2"
  • Supports 24p

Significant disadvantages of the T3i (vs the Z650)

  • Much larger: Professional size (133×100×80 mm) vs Standard size (98×78×73 mm)
  • Significantly thicker: 3.1" vs 2.9"
  • Significantly heavier: 570 g vs 320 g

common strengths of the T3i and Z650

  • None found