Summary Kodak Z1012 IS

Prices Price
Camera only
Unknown
Score Snapsort rank
Among similar cameras
#n/a of 9
Specifications Key specs
Zoom
Help 12x
Screen size
Help 2.5"
Aperture
Help f/2.8
Screen resolution
Help 230k dots
Wide angle
Help 33 mm
Movie format
Help 720p @ 30fps
see all specifications

gallery

Explore our gallery of 12 sample photos taken by the Kodak EasyShare Z1012 IS.

Pros

Report a correction

The Kodak Z1012 IS vs other recent digicams

Image stabilization Image stabilization Help
  1. Lens
Fastest shutter speed Fast shutter speed Help
1/3200 of a second
Viewfinder Doesn't use battery, see more detail Help
Digital
Report a correction

The Kodak Z1012 IS vs other recent super zooms

Size Quite small Help
Standard size (109×74×77 mm)
Weight Light Help
375 g
Thickness Thin Help
3"

Cons

Report a correction

The Kodak Z1012 IS vs other recent digicams

Screen resolution Very low resolution screen Help
230k dots
Touch screen No touch screen Help
More buttons
Sensor size Slightly smaller than average sensor Help
1/2.3" 6.13x4.6mm
Announced Old Help
August 2007
Light sensitivity Poor maximum light sensitivity Help
3,200 ISO
True resolution Lower true resolution Help
9.8 MP
Sensor type Sensor type Help
CCD
Longest exposure Short exposures Help
1/30 of a second
Report a correction

The Kodak Z1012 IS vs other recent super zooms

Zoom Poor zoom Help
12x
Wide angle Very poor wide angle lens Help
33 mm
High-speed framerate High speed movies Help
Not supported
Screen flips out Fixed screen Help
Less flexible
Screen type Screen type Help
LCD
Popularity Not so popular Help
Among snapsort users
Movie format HD movies Help
720p @ 30fps
Screen size Very small screen Help
2.5"
Continuous shooting Slow continuous shooting Help
1.6 fps
External mic jack Lacks an external mic jack Help
Limited to the in-camera mic
External flash No external flash Help
Less expandable

Discussion

Placeholder
EasyShare Z1012 IS
Kodak

Report a correction

Showing 1 comments

Avatar for RENATO MENDES RENATO MENDES (7:38 PM, July 07, 2011)
Não recomendo. tava muito e lenta demais!