As well as being compared against other compacts, the Kodak EasyShare V570 is also often compared to super zooms and travel zooms. The Kodak EasyShare V570's top rivals come from Kodak (such as the EasyShare V705) and Nikon (such as the Coolpix P530)

Competitor classes

compared toCompact competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Kodak V570 compared to other compact competitors include: it has a faster max shutter speed (1/1448 of a second vs 1/1170 of a second).

However, on average it has a significantly narrower aperture (f/3.9 vs f/2.8), has a much narrower wide angle lens (39 mm vs 23 mm) and is older (january 2006 vs august 2006).

Kodak EasyShare V705

Kodak EasyShare V705
7 months newer

Significant advantages of the V705 (vs the V570)

  • Much better wide angle: 23 mm vs 39 mm
  • Significantly wider aperture: f/2.8 vs f/3.9

Significant disadvantages of the V705 (vs the V570)

  • Significantly slower max shutter speed: 1/1170 of a second vs 1/1448 of a second

common strengths of the V705 and V570

  • Very small: Super compact (101×50×20 mm) vs Super compact (101×50×20 mm)
  • Very thin: 0.8" vs 0.8"
  • Very light: 165 g vs 175 g

compared toSuper zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Kodak V570 compared to super zoom competitors include: it is slightly smaller (super compact (101×50×20 mm) vs professional size (123×84×98 mm)), is thinner (0.8" vs 3.9") and is slightly lighter (175 g vs 494 g).

However, on average it has a significantly narrower aperture (f/3.9 vs f/3), has a much narrower wide angle lens (39 mm vs 24 mm), has a much smaller screen (2.5" vs 3"), has a much lower resolution screen (230k dots vs 921k dots) and doesn't have image stabilization (none vs lens).

Nikon Coolpix P530

Nikon Coolpix P530
8 years newer
$344

Significant advantages of the P530 (vs the V570)

  • Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 39 mm
  • Much larger screen: 3" vs 2.5"
  • Image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs None

Significant disadvantages of the P530 (vs the V570)

  • Larger: Professional size (123×84×98 mm) vs Super compact (101×50×20 mm)
  • Significantly thicker: 3.9" vs 0.8"
  • Heavier: 494 g vs 175 g

common strengths of the P530 and V570

  • Fairly small: Professional size (123×84×98 mm) vs Super compact (101×50×20 mm)
  • Light weight: 494 g vs 175 g
  • Thin: 3.9" vs 0.8"

compared toTravel zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Kodak V570 compared to travel zoom competitors include: it is much smaller (super compact (101×50×20 mm) vs compact (105×58×33 mm)), is thinner (0.8" vs 1.3") and is slightly lighter (175 g vs 210 g).

However, on average it has slightly less zoom (3x vs 16x), has a much narrower wide angle lens (39 mm vs 24 mm), has a slightly narrower aperture (f/3.9 vs f/3.3), has a much smaller screen (2.5" vs 3") and doesn't have image stabilization (none vs lens).

Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS8

Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS8
5 years newer

Significant advantages of the DMC-ZS8 (vs the V570)

  • Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 39 mm
  • Image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs None
  • Much larger screen: 3" vs 2.5"

Significant disadvantages of the DMC-ZS8 (vs the V570)

  • Much larger: Compact (105×58×33 mm) vs Super compact (101×50×20 mm)
  • Much thicker: 1.3" vs 0.8"

common strengths of the DMC-ZS8 and V570

  • Very small: Compact (105×58×33 mm) vs Super compact (101×50×20 mm)
  • Thin: 1.3" vs 0.8"
  • Very light: 210 g vs 175 g