As well as being compared against other compacts, the Kodak EasyShare V1073 is also often compared to travel zooms, entry-level DSLRs, pro digicams, super zooms and digicams. The Kodak EasyShare V1073's top rivals come from Panasonic (such as the Lumix SZ9 and the Lumix DMC-TS30) and Canon (such as the EOS Rebel T6i and the PowerShot G7 X)
Generally, some of the advantages of the Kodak V1073 compared to other compact competitors include: it is slightly smaller (super compact (93×58×21 mm) vs compact (94×62×31 mm)) and is thinner (0.8" vs 1.2").
However, on average it has a much narrower wide angle lens (37 mm vs 28 mm), doesn't have image stabilization (none vs digital), doesn't have a touch screen, has a CCD-family sensor (CCD vs CMOS) and is older (january 2008 vs february 2011).
Generally, some of the advantages of the Kodak V1073 compared to travel zoom competitors include: it has a slightly wider aperture (f/3.1 vs f/3.8), has a marginally larger sensor (1/1.6" 8.3x6.2mm vs 1/2.3" 6.17x4.55mm) and is slightly less expensive ($375.49 vs $2,192.19).
However, on average it has a much narrower wide angle lens (37 mm vs 24 mm), doesn't have a built-in GPS, has a much lower resolution screen (230k dots vs 920k dots), doesn't have image stabilization (none vs lens) and doesn't shoot as fast continuously (3 fps vs 40 fps).
/panasonic-lumix-dmc-zs60-(lumix-dmc-tz80)_front_small.jpg "Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS60 (Lumix DMC-TZ80)")
Generally, some of the advantages of the Kodak V1073 compared to entry-level DSLR competitors include: it is much smaller (super compact (93×58×21 mm) vs professional size (132×101×78 mm)), is slightly less expensive ($375.49 vs $549.00), is thinner (0.8" vs 3.1") and is much lighter (188 g vs 555 g).
However, on average it records lower quality movies (720p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps), has a much lower resolution screen (230k dots vs 1,040k dots), takes much lower resolution photos (10 MP vs 24 MP), doesn't have a touch screen and doesn't record movies in 24p.
Generally, some of the advantages of the Kodak V1073 compared to pro digicam competitors include: it has a slightly larger screen (3" vs 2.5"), is significantly smaller (super compact (93×58×21 mm) vs large (131×98×128 mm)), is thinner (0.8" vs 5"), is significantly lighter (188 g vs 813 g) and is significantly less expensive ($375.49 vs $798.00).
However, on average it has a marginally smaller sensor (1/1.6" 8.3x6.2mm vs nikon CX 13.2x8.8mm), has a slightly narrower aperture (f/3.1 vs f/2.8), has a much narrower wide angle lens (37 mm vs 24 mm), has a much lower resolution screen (230k dots vs 1,229k dots) and doesn't have image stabilization (none vs lens).
Generally, some of the advantages of the Kodak V1073 compared to super zoom competitors include: it is slightly smaller (super compact (93×58×21 mm) vs prosumer size (114×89×96 mm)), has a marginally larger sensor (1/1.6" 8.3x6.2mm vs 1/2.7" 5.6x4.2mm), is thinner (0.8" vs 4.8") and is slightly lighter (188 g vs 538 g).
However, on average it has a much narrower wide angle lens (37 mm vs 4 mm), has a significantly lower resolution screen (230k dots vs 921k dots), doesn't have image stabilization (none vs lens), doesn't have a screen which flips out and has a CCD-family sensor (CCD vs CMOS).
Generally, some of the advantages of the Kodak V1073 compared to digicam competitors include: it has a significantly larger screen (3" vs 2"), takes slightly higher resolution photos (10 MP vs 1.2 MP), has a marginally larger sensor (1/1.6" 8.3x6.2mm vs 1/3" 5.27x3.96mm) and is thinner (0.8" vs 2.7").
However, on average it has a much narrower wide angle lens (37 mm vs 30 mm), has a slightly lower resolution screen (230k dots vs 1,040k dots), doesn't have image stabilization (none vs digital), doesn't have a screen which flips out and has a CCD-family sensor (CCD vs CMOS).
