As well as being compared against other ultra compacts, the Kodak EasyShare M883 is also often compared to compacts. The Kodak EasyShare M883's top rivals come from Panasonic (such as the Lumix DMC-S2) and Kodak (such as the EasyShare M873)

Competitor classes

compared toUltra compact competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Kodak M883 compared to other ultra compact competitors include: it has a much larger screen (3" vs 2.5") and slightly higher maximum light sensitivity (3,200 ISO vs 1,600 ISO).

However, on average it is slightly larger (ultra compact (92×57×19 mm) vs ultra compact (92×56×18 mm)).

Kodak EasyShare M873

Kodak EasyShare M873
similar age

Significant advantages of the M873 (vs the M883)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the M873 (vs the M883)

  • None found

common strengths of the M873 and M883

  • None found

compared toCompact competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Kodak M883 compared to compact competitors include: it has a much larger screen (3" vs 2.7"), is significantly smaller (ultra compact (92×57×19 mm) vs super compact (98×57×21 mm)) and slightly higher maximum light sensitivity (3,200 ISO vs 1,600 ISO).

However, on average it has a much narrower wide angle lens (38 mm vs 28 mm), doesn't have image stabilization (none vs lens), is older (june 2007 vs january 2012), is significantly heavier (166 g vs 112 g) and has a slower max shutter speed (1/1000 of a second vs 1/1600 of a second).

Panasonic Lumix DMC-S2

Panasonic Lumix DMC-S2
4 years newer
$128

Significant advantages of the DMC-S2 (vs the M883)

  • Much better wide angle: 28 mm vs 38 mm
  • Image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs None
  • Significantly lighter: 112 g vs 166 g

Significant disadvantages of the DMC-S2 (vs the M883)

  • Much smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3"
  • Significantly larger: Super compact (98×57×21 mm) vs Ultra compact (92×57×19 mm)

common strengths of the DMC-S2 and M883

  • Very small: Super compact (98×57×21 mm) vs Ultra compact (92×57×19 mm)
  • Very thin: 0.8" vs 0.7"
  • Very light: 112 g vs 166 g