As well as being compared against other compacts, the Kodak EasyShare M575 is also often compared to travel zooms. The Kodak EasyShare M575's top rivals come from Kodak (such as the EasyShare M531 and the EasyShare V550) and Canon (such as the PowerShot ELPH 350 HS)

Competitor classes

compared toCompact competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Kodak M575 compared to other compact competitors include: it has significantly more zoom (5x vs 3x), has a significantly wider wide angle lens (28 mm vs 36 mm), has a slightly larger screen (3" vs 2.5"), is thinner (0.7" vs 0.9") and has a faster max shutter speed (1/1400 of a second vs 4 seconds).

However, on average it doesn't have image stabilization (none vs digital), is slightly more expensive ($427.92 vs $119.48) and doesn't have a viewfinder (none vs tunnel).

Kodak EasyShare M531

Kodak EasyShare M531
7 months newer
$116

Significant advantages of the M531 (vs the M575)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the M531 (vs the M575)

  • Much worse wide angle: 36 mm vs 28 mm
  • Much less zoom: 3x vs 5x

common strengths of the M531 and M575

  • Each has a built-in flash
  • Fairly small: Super compact (94×57×23 mm) vs Super compact (99×58×19 mm)
  • Very thin: 0.9" vs 0.7"

Kodak EasyShare V550

Kodak EasyShare V550
4 years older
$329

Significant advantages of the V550 (vs the M575)

  • Has a viewfinder: Tunnel vs None

Significant disadvantages of the V550 (vs the M575)

  • Much worse wide angle: 36 mm vs 28 mm
  • Much less zoom: 3x vs 5x

common strengths of the V550 and M575

  • Each has a built-in flash
  • Fairly small: Super compact (94×56×22 mm) vs Super compact (99×58×19 mm)
  • Very thin: 0.9" vs 0.7"

Kodak PixPro FZ51

Kodak PixPro FZ51
3 years newer
$119

Significant advantages of the FZ51 (vs the M575)

  • Image stabilization:
    1. Digital
    vs None

Significant disadvantages of the FZ51 (vs the M575)

  • Much slower max shutter speed: 4 seconds vs 1/1400 of a second

common strengths of the FZ51 and M575

  • Each has a built-in flash
  • Great zoom: 5x vs 5x
  • Fairly small: Super compact (92×57×23 mm) vs Super compact (99×58×19 mm)

Fujifilm FinePix JX250

Fujifilm FinePix JX250
similar age

Significant advantages of the JX250 (vs the M575)

  • Image stabilization:
    1. Digital
    vs None

Significant disadvantages of the JX250 (vs the M575)

  • None found

common strengths of the JX250 and M575

  • Each has a built-in flash
  • Great zoom: 5x vs 5x
  • Fairly small: Super compact (93×55×23 mm) vs Super compact (99×58×19 mm)

compared toTravel zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Kodak M575 compared to travel zoom competitors include: it is thinner (0.7" vs 0.9").

However, on average it has way more less zoom (5x vs 12x), has a significantly narrower wide angle lens (28 mm vs 25 mm), doesn't have a built-in GPS, has a slightly lower resolution screen (230k dots vs 461k dots) and doesn't have image stabilization (none vs lens).

Canon PowerShot ELPH 350 HS

Canon PowerShot ELPH 350 HS
5 years newer
$194

Significant advantages of the ELPH 350 HS (vs the M575)

  • Much more zoom: 12x vs 5x
  • Has a GPS
  • Image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs None

Significant disadvantages of the ELPH 350 HS (vs the M575)

  • None found

common strengths of the ELPH 350 HS and M575

  • Very small: Compact (100×58×23 mm) vs Super compact (99×58×19 mm)
  • Very thin: 0.9" vs 0.7"
  • Very light: 147 g vs 152 g