As well as being compared against other compacts, the Kodak EasyShare M575 is also often compared to ultra compacts and travel zooms. The Kodak EasyShare M575's top rivals come from Kodak (such as the EasyShare M531 and the EasyShare M530) and Olympus (such as the VG110 and the Stylus 1050 SW)

Competitor classes

compared toCompact competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Kodak M575 compared to other compact competitors include: it records lower quality movies (720p @ 30fps vs 480p @ 30fps), has a much wider wide angle lens (28 mm vs 36 mm), has a slightly larger screen (3" vs 2.7"), is slightly smaller (super compact (99×58×19 mm) vs compact (93×59×26 mm)) and is thinner (0.7" vs 1").

However, on average it doesn't have image stabilization (none vs sensor shift) and doesn't have a touch screen.

Kodak EasyShare M531

Kodak EasyShare M531
7 months newer
$150

Significant advantages of the M531 (vs the M575)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the M531 (vs the M575)

  • Much worse wide angle: 36 mm vs 28 mm
  • Significantly smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3"

common strengths of the M531 and M575

  • Fairly small: Super compact (94×57×23 mm) vs Super compact (99×58×19 mm)
  • Thin: 0.9" vs 0.7"
  • Light weight: 130 g vs 152 g

Kodak EasyShare M530

Kodak EasyShare M530
similar age
$130

Significant advantages of the M530 (vs the M575)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the M530 (vs the M575)

  • Much worse wide angle: 36 mm vs 28 mm
  • Significantly smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3"

common strengths of the M530 and M575

  • Fairly small: Super compact (94×57×23 mm) vs Super compact (99×58×19 mm)
  • Thin: 0.9" vs 0.7"
  • Light weight: 150 g vs 152 g

Olympus Stylus 1050 SW

Olympus Stylus 1050 SW
1 year older
$220

Significant advantages of the 1050 SW (vs the M575)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the 1050 SW (vs the M575)

  • Much worse wide angle: 38 mm vs 28 mm
  • Significantly smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3"
  • Much slower max shutter speed: 1/1000 of a second vs 1/1400 of a second

common strengths of the 1050 SW and M575

  • Fairly small: Compact (93×62×23 mm) vs Super compact (99×58×19 mm)
  • Thin: 0.9" vs 0.7"

Kodak Easyshare C1530

Kodak Easyshare C1530
1 year newer
$124

Significant advantages of the C1530 (vs the M575)

  • Image stabilization:
    1. Sensor shift
    vs None

Significant disadvantages of the C1530 (vs the M575)

  • Much worse wide angle: 32 mm vs 28 mm
  • Significantly larger: Compact (96×62×31 mm) vs Super compact (99×58×19 mm)
  • Significantly thicker: 1.2" vs 0.7"

common strengths of the C1530 and M575

  • Larger than average screens: 3" vs 3"

Kodak EasyShare Touch M577

Kodak EasyShare Touch M577
1 year newer
$160

Significant advantages of the M577 (vs the M575)

  • Has a touch screen
  • Significantly faster max shutter speed: 1/1600 of a second vs 1/1400 of a second

Significant disadvantages of the M577 (vs the M575)

  • None found

common strengths of the M577 and M575

  • Fairly small: Super compact (99×58×20 mm) vs Super compact (99×58×19 mm)
  • Thin: 0.8" vs 0.7"
  • Light weight: 150 g vs 152 g

Canon PowerShot SD870 IS

Canon PowerShot SD870 IS
2 years older

Significant advantages of the SD870 IS (vs the M575)

  • Image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs None
  • Significantly faster max shutter speed: 1/1600 of a second vs 1/1400 of a second

Significant disadvantages of the SD870 IS (vs the M575)

  • Thicker: 1" vs 0.7"

common strengths of the SD870 IS and M575

  • Fairly small: Compact (93×59×26 mm) vs Super compact (99×58×19 mm)
  • Larger than average screens: 3" vs 3"

compared toUltra compact competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Kodak M575 compared to ultra compact competitors include: it has a much wider wide angle lens (28 mm vs 35 mm), has a significantly larger screen (3" vs 2.7") and has a faster max shutter speed (1/1400 of a second vs 1/1200 of a second).

However, on average it doesn't have image stabilization (none vs lens).

Olympus VG110

Olympus VG-110
1 year newer
$94

Significant advantages of the VG110 (vs the M575)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the VG110 (vs the M575)

  • None found

common strengths of the VG110 and M575

  • None found

Canon PowerShot SD1400 IS

Canon PowerShot SD1400 IS
similar age
$99

Significant advantages of the SD1400 IS (vs the M575)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the SD1400 IS (vs the M575)

  • None found

common strengths of the SD1400 IS and M575

  • None found

Kodak EasyShare M883

Kodak EasyShare M883
2 years older

Significant advantages of the M883 (vs the M575)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the M883 (vs the M575)

  • None found

common strengths of the M883 and M575

  • None found

Kodak EasyShare M590

Kodak EasyShare M590
7 months newer
$113

Significant advantages of the M590 (vs the M575)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the M590 (vs the M575)

  • None found

common strengths of the M590 and M575

  • None found

compared toTravel zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Kodak M575 compared to travel zoom competitors include: it has a slightly larger screen (3" vs 2.7"), is significantly smaller (super compact (99×58×19 mm) vs compact (110×64×35 mm)), is thinner (0.7" vs 1.4") and is slightly lighter (152 g vs 225 g).

However, on average it has significantly less zoom (5x vs 30x), has a slightly narrower wide angle lens (28 mm vs 25 mm), doesn't have a built-in GPS, has a slightly lower resolution screen (230k dots vs 921k dots) and doesn't record high-speed movies (none vs 240 fps).

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H55

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H55
similar age
$201

Significant advantages of the DSC-H55 (vs the M575)

  • Image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs None
  • Significantly better wide angle: 25 mm vs 28 mm
  • Significantly longer exposures: 30 seconds vs 8 seconds

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-H55 (vs the M575)

  • Significantly larger: Compact (103×58×29 mm) vs Super compact (99×58×19 mm)
  • Significantly thicker: 1.1" vs 0.7"

common strengths of the DSC-H55 and M575

  • Fairly small: Compact (103×58×29 mm) vs Super compact (99×58×19 mm)
  • Thin: 1.1" vs 0.7"
  • Light weight: 200 g vs 152 g

Olympus Stylus 9000

Olympus Stylus 9000
1 year older
$141

Significant advantages of the 9000 (vs the M575)

  • Image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    2. Sensor shift
    vs None
  • Much faster max shutter speed: 1/2000 of a second vs 1/1400 of a second

Significant disadvantages of the 9000 (vs the M575)

  • Significantly smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3"
  • Significantly larger: Compact (96×60×31 mm) vs Super compact (99×58×19 mm)
  • Significantly thicker: 1.2" vs 0.7"

common strengths of the 9000 and M575

  • Fairly small: Compact (96×60×31 mm) vs Super compact (99×58×19 mm)

Nikon Coolpix S9700

Nikon Coolpix S9700
4 years newer
$189

Significant advantages of the S9700 (vs the M575)

  • Has a GPS
  • Much more zoom: 30x vs 5x
  • Image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs None

Significant disadvantages of the S9700 (vs the M575)

  • Much larger: Compact (110×64×35 mm) vs Super compact (99×58×19 mm)
  • Much thicker: 1.4" vs 0.7"
  • Significantly heavier: 232 g vs 152 g

common strengths of the S9700 and M575

  • None found