As well as being compared against other compacts, the Kodak EasyShare M575 is also often compared to ultra compacts and travel zooms. The Kodak EasyShare M575's top rivals come from Canon (such as the PowerShot SD1400 IS) and Kodak (such as the EasyShare M883 and the PixPro FZ41)

Competitor classes

compared toCompact competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Kodak M575 compared to other compact competitors include: it has a much wider wide angle lens (28 mm vs 35 mm), has a significantly larger screen (3" vs 2.7"), is slightly smaller (super compact (99×58×19 mm) vs compact (93×60×27 mm)), is newer (january 2010 vs january 2008) and is thinner (0.7" vs 1").

However, on average it doesn't have image stabilization (none vs digital), doesn't have a touch screen and is slightly more expensive ($370.44 vs $129.99).

Kodak PixPro FZ41

Kodak PixPro FZ41
3 years newer

Significant advantages of the FZ41 (vs the M575)

  • Image stabilization:
    1. Digital
    vs None

Significant disadvantages of the FZ41 (vs the M575)

  • Much slower max shutter speed: 4 seconds vs 1/1400 of a second
  • Significantly smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3"
  • Significantly thicker: 1" vs 0.7"

common strengths of the FZ41 and M575

  • Light weight: 116 g vs 152 g

Kodak EasyShare Z1275

Kodak EasyShare Z1275
2 years older

Significant advantages of the Z1275 (vs the M575)

  • Much faster max shutter speed: 1/2000 of a second vs 1/1400 of a second

Significant disadvantages of the Z1275 (vs the M575)

  • Much worse wide angle: 35 mm vs 28 mm
  • Much smaller screen: 2.5" vs 3"
  • Significantly larger: Compact (90×65×32 mm) vs Super compact (99×58×19 mm)

common strengths of the Z1275 and M575

  • None found

Kodak EasyShare V550

Kodak EasyShare V550
4 years older
$338

Significant advantages of the V550 (vs the M575)

  • Has a viewfinder: Tunnel vs None

Significant disadvantages of the V550 (vs the M575)

  • Much worse wide angle: 36 mm vs 28 mm
  • Much smaller screen: 2.5" vs 3"
  • Lower resolution movies: 480p @ 30fps vs 720p @ 30fps

common strengths of the V550 and M575

  • Fairly small: Super compact (94×56×22 mm) vs Super compact (99×58×19 mm)
  • Thin: 0.9" vs 0.7"

Kodak EasyShare M1033

Kodak EasyShare M1033
2 years older
$245

Significant advantages of the M1033 (vs the M575)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the M1033 (vs the M575)

  • Much worse wide angle: 35 mm vs 28 mm

common strengths of the M1033 and M575

  • Fairly small: Super compact (94×58×21 mm) vs Super compact (99×58×19 mm)
  • Larger than average screens: 3" vs 3"
  • Thin: 0.8" vs 0.7"

Kodak EasyShare Touch M577

Kodak EasyShare Touch M577
1 year newer

Significant advantages of the M577 (vs the M575)

  • Has a touch screen
  • Significantly faster max shutter speed: 1/1600 of a second vs 1/1400 of a second

Significant disadvantages of the M577 (vs the M575)

  • None found

common strengths of the M577 and M575

  • Fairly small: Super compact (99×58×20 mm) vs Super compact (99×58×19 mm)
  • Thin: 0.8" vs 0.7"
  • Light weight: 150 g vs 152 g

Kodak EasyShare M530

Kodak EasyShare M530
similar age
$130

Significant advantages of the M530 (vs the M575)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the M530 (vs the M575)

  • Much worse wide angle: 36 mm vs 28 mm
  • Significantly smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3"
  • Lower resolution movies: 480p @ 30fps vs 720p @ 30fps

common strengths of the M530 and M575

  • Fairly small: Super compact (94×57×23 mm) vs Super compact (99×58×19 mm)
  • Thin: 0.9" vs 0.7"
  • Light weight: 150 g vs 152 g

compared toUltra compact competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Kodak M575 compared to ultra compact competitors include: it records lower quality movies (720p @ 30fps vs 480p @ 30fps), has a much wider wide angle lens (28 mm vs 38 mm), has a slightly larger screen (3" vs 2.7"), is newer (january 2010 vs june 2007) and has a faster max shutter speed (1/1400 of a second vs 1/1000 of a second).

However, on average it doesn't have image stabilization (none vs lens) and is slightly more expensive ($370.44 vs $179.99).

Canon PowerShot SD1400 IS

Canon PowerShot SD1400 IS
similar age
$180

Significant advantages of the SD1400 IS (vs the M575)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the SD1400 IS (vs the M575)

  • None found

common strengths of the SD1400 IS and M575

  • None found

Kodak EasyShare M883

Kodak EasyShare M883
2 years older

Significant advantages of the M883 (vs the M575)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the M883 (vs the M575)

  • None found

common strengths of the M883 and M575

  • None found

compared toTravel zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Kodak M575 compared to travel zoom competitors include: it has a slightly larger screen (3" vs 2.7"), is slightly smaller (super compact (99×58×19 mm) vs compact (103×58×29 mm)) and is thinner (0.7" vs 1.1").

However, on average it has a significantly narrower wide angle lens (28 mm vs 25 mm), doesn't have image stabilization (none vs lens), is older (january 2010 vs january 2014), is slightly more expensive ($370.44 vs $99.00) and is less popular.

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W830

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W830
4 years newer
$99 - $118

Significant advantages of the DSC-W830 (vs the M575)

  • Image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs None
  • Significantly better wide angle: 25 mm vs 28 mm
  • Significantly faster max shutter speed: 1/1600 of a second vs 1/1400 of a second

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-W830 (vs the M575)

  • Significantly smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3"

common strengths of the DSC-W830 and M575

  • Very small: Super compact (93×52×23 mm) vs Super compact (99×58×19 mm)
  • Very thin: 0.9" vs 0.7"
  • Light weight: 122 g vs 152 g

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H55

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H55
similar age

Significant advantages of the DSC-H55 (vs the M575)

  • Image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs None
  • Significantly better wide angle: 25 mm vs 28 mm
  • Much longer exposures: 30 seconds vs 8 seconds

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-H55 (vs the M575)

  • Significantly larger: Compact (103×58×29 mm) vs Super compact (99×58×19 mm)
  • Significantly thicker: 1.1" vs 0.7"

common strengths of the DSC-H55 and M575

  • Fairly small: Compact (103×58×29 mm) vs Super compact (99×58×19 mm)
  • Larger than average screens: 3" vs 3"
  • Thin: 1.1" vs 0.7"