As well as being compared against other compacts, the Kodak EasyShare M575 is also often compared to pro DSLRs and travel zooms. The Kodak EasyShare M575's top rivals come from Fujifilm (such as the FinePix AV200) and Olympus (such as the Stylus 1050 SW)

Competitor classes

compared toCompact competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Kodak M575 compared to other compact competitors include: it records lower quality movies (720p @ 30fps vs 480p @ 30fps), has a much wider wide angle lens (28 mm vs 36 mm), has a significantly larger screen (3" vs 2.7"), is slightly smaller (super compact (99×58×19 mm) vs compact (93×60×28 mm)) and is thinner (0.7" vs 1.1").

However, on average it doesn't have image stabilization (none vs digital), doesn't have a touch screen and is older (january 2010 vs august 2010).

Fujifilm FinePix AV200

Fujifilm FinePix AV200
1 year newer

Significant advantages of the AV200 (vs the M575)

  • Image stabilization:
    1. Digital
    vs None

Significant disadvantages of the AV200 (vs the M575)

  • Significantly worse wide angle: 32 mm vs 28 mm
  • Significantly smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3"
  • Larger: Compact (93×60×28 mm) vs Super compact (99×58×19 mm)

common strengths of the AV200 and M575

  • None found

Olympus Stylus 1050 SW

Olympus Stylus 1050 SW
1 year older
$189

Significant advantages of the 1050 SW (vs the M575)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the 1050 SW (vs the M575)

  • Much worse wide angle: 38 mm vs 28 mm
  • Significantly smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3"
  • Lower resolution movies: 480p @ 30fps vs 720p @ 30fps

common strengths of the 1050 SW and M575

  • Fairly small: Compact (93×62×23 mm) vs Super compact (99×58×19 mm)
  • Thin: 0.9" vs 0.7"

Kodak EasyShare M531

Kodak EasyShare M531
7 months newer
$150

Significant advantages of the M531 (vs the M575)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the M531 (vs the M575)

  • Much worse wide angle: 36 mm vs 28 mm
  • Significantly smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3"
  • Lower resolution movies: 480p @ 30fps vs 720p @ 30fps

common strengths of the M531 and M575

  • Fairly small: Super compact (94×57×23 mm) vs Super compact (99×58×19 mm)
  • Thin: 0.9" vs 0.7"
  • Light weight: 130 g vs 152 g

Kodak EasyShare Touch M577

Kodak EasyShare Touch M577
1 year newer
$160

Significant advantages of the M577 (vs the M575)

  • Has a touch screen
  • Significantly faster max shutter speed: 1/1600 of a second vs 1/1400 of a second

Significant disadvantages of the M577 (vs the M575)

  • None found

common strengths of the M577 and M575

  • Fairly small: Super compact (99×58×20 mm) vs Super compact (99×58×19 mm)
  • Thin: 0.8" vs 0.7"
  • Light weight: 150 g vs 152 g

Kodak Easyshare C1530

Kodak Easyshare C1530
1 year newer
$145

Significant advantages of the C1530 (vs the M575)

  • Image stabilization:
    1. Sensor shift
    vs None

Significant disadvantages of the C1530 (vs the M575)

  • Significantly worse wide angle: 32 mm vs 28 mm
  • Significantly larger: Compact (96×62×31 mm) vs Super compact (99×58×19 mm)
  • Lower resolution movies: 480p @ 30fps vs 720p @ 30fps

common strengths of the C1530 and M575

  • Larger than average screens: 3" vs 3"

compared toPro DSLR competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Kodak M575 compared to pro DSLR competitors include: it is much smaller (super compact (99×58×19 mm) vs professional size (143×104×81 mm)), is slightly less expensive ($179.96 vs $1,499.00), is thinner (0.7" vs 3.2") and is significantly lighter (152 g vs 732 g).

However, on average it records lower quality movies (720p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 60fps), has a significantly lower resolution screen (230k dots vs 921k dots), doesn't have image stabilization (none vs sensor shift), takes much lower resolution photos (9.8 MP vs 24 MP) and doesn't record movies in 24p.

Sony SLT A77

Sony SLT-A77
1 year newer
$1,531 (body only)
$1,499 16-50mm lens

Significant advantages of the SLT A77 (vs the M575)

  • Has a viewfinder: Digital vs None
  • Image stabilization:
    1. Sensor shift
    vs None
  • Supports 24p

Significant disadvantages of the SLT A77 (vs the M575)

  • Much thicker: 3.2" vs 0.7"
  • Much larger: Professional size (143×104×81 mm) vs Super compact (99×58×19 mm)
  • Significantly heavier: 732 g vs 152 g

common strengths of the SLT A77 and M575

  • Fairly small: Professional size (143×104×81 mm) vs Super compact (99×58×19 mm)
  • Light weight: 732 g vs 152 g
  • Inexpensive: $1,499.00 vs $179.96

compared toTravel zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Kodak M575 compared to travel zoom competitors include: it is much smaller (super compact (99×58×19 mm) vs compact (110×64×35 mm)), is thinner (0.7" vs 1.4") and is slightly lighter (152 g vs 232 g).

However, on average it has much less zoom (5x vs 30x), has a significantly narrower wide angle lens (28 mm vs 25 mm), doesn't have a built-in GPS, records lower quality movies (720p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps) and has a slightly lower resolution screen (230k dots vs 921k dots).

Nikon Coolpix S9700

Nikon Coolpix S9700
4 years newer
$189

Significant advantages of the S9700 (vs the M575)

  • Much more zoom: 30x vs 5x
  • Has a GPS
  • Image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs None

Significant disadvantages of the S9700 (vs the M575)

  • Much larger: Compact (110×64×35 mm) vs Super compact (99×58×19 mm)
  • Much thicker: 1.4" vs 0.7"
  • Significantly heavier: 232 g vs 152 g

common strengths of the S9700 and M575

  • Larger than average screens: 3" vs 3"

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H55

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H55
similar age
$195

Significant advantages of the DSC-H55 (vs the M575)

  • Image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs None
  • Significantly better wide angle: 25 mm vs 28 mm
  • Much longer exposures: 30 seconds vs 8 seconds

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-H55 (vs the M575)

  • Significantly larger: Compact (103×58×29 mm) vs Super compact (99×58×19 mm)
  • Significantly thicker: 1.1" vs 0.7"

common strengths of the DSC-H55 and M575

  • Fairly small: Compact (103×58×29 mm) vs Super compact (99×58×19 mm)
  • Larger than average screens: 3" vs 3"
  • Thin: 1.1" vs 0.7"