As well as being compared against other compacts, the Kodak EasyShare M575 is also often compared to ultra compacts, entry-level DSLRs and travel zooms. The Kodak EasyShare M575's top rivals come from Canon (such as the PowerShot SD1400 IS and the Rebel T4i) and Kodak (such as the EasyShare M531 and the EasyShare Touch M577)

compared toCompact competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Kodak M575 compared to other compact competitors include: it has a slightly wider wide angle lens (28 mm vs 35 mm), is slightly smaller (super compact (99×58×19 mm) vs compact (110×65×25 mm)), is thinner (0.7" vs 1"), is slightly less expensive ($408.41 vs $825.99) and has a faster max shutter speed (1/1400 of a second vs 1 seconds).

However, on average it has a slightly lower resolution screen (230k dots vs 614k dots), doesn't have image stabilization (none vs lens), doesn't have a touch screen, has a CCD-family sensor (CCD vs CMOS) and doesn't have an OLED screen (LCD vs OLED).

Kodak EasyShare M531

Kodak EasyShare M531
7 months newer
$266

Significant advantages of the M531 (vs the M575)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the M531 (vs the M575)

  • Much worse wide angle: 36 mm vs 28 mm

common strengths of the M531 and M575

  • Each has a built-in flash
  • Fairly small: Super compact (94×57×23 mm) vs Super compact (99×58×19 mm)
  • Very thin: 0.9" vs 0.7"

Panasonic Lumix TS5

Panasonic Lumix TS5
3 years newer
$1,123

Significant advantages of the TS5 (vs the M575)

  • Image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs None
  • Has a CMOS-family sensor: CMOS vs CCD
  • Has a GPS

Significant disadvantages of the TS5 (vs the M575)

  • Significantly larger: Compact (110×64×29 mm) vs Super compact (99×58×19 mm)
  • Significantly thicker: 1.1" vs 0.7"
  • Heavier: 214 g vs 152 g

common strengths of the TS5 and M575

  • Each has a built-in flash
  • Larger than average screens: 3" vs 3"
  • Thin: 1.1" vs 0.7"

Casio Exilim EX-TR10

Casio Exilim EX-TR10
3 years newer
$826

Significant advantages of the EX-TR10 (vs the M575)

  • Much better wide angle: 21 mm vs 28 mm
  • Has a CMOS-family sensor: CMOS vs CCD
  • Significantly higher resolution screen: 921k dots vs 230k dots

Significant disadvantages of the EX-TR10 (vs the M575)

  • Much slower max shutter speed: 1 seconds vs 1/1400 of a second

common strengths of the EX-TR10 and M575

  • Each has a built-in flash
  • Fairly small: Super compact (129×62×15 mm) vs Super compact (99×58×19 mm)
  • Larger than average screens: 3" vs 3"

Kodak EasyShare Touch M577

Kodak EasyShare Touch M577
1 year newer

Significant advantages of the M577 (vs the M575)

  • Has a touch screen

Significant disadvantages of the M577 (vs the M575)

  • None found

common strengths of the M577 and M575

  • Each has a built-in flash
  • Fairly small: Super compact (99×58×20 mm) vs Super compact (99×58×19 mm)
  • Very thin: 0.8" vs 0.7"

Nikon Coolpix AW110

Nikon Coolpix AW110
3 years newer
$462

Significant advantages of the AW110 (vs the M575)

  • Image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs None
  • Has a CMOS-family sensor: CMOS vs CCD
  • Has an OLED screen: OLED vs LCD

Significant disadvantages of the AW110 (vs the M575)

  • Larger: Compact (110×65×25 mm) vs Super compact (99×58×19 mm)
  • Thicker: 1" vs 0.7"

common strengths of the AW110 and M575

  • Each has a built-in flash
  • Larger than average screens: 3" vs 3"
  • Very thin: 1" vs 0.7"

Kodak EasyShare Z1275

Kodak EasyShare Z1275
2 years older

Significant advantages of the Z1275 (vs the M575)

  • Faster max shutter speed: 1/2000 of a second vs 1/1400 of a second

Significant disadvantages of the Z1275 (vs the M575)

  • Much worse wide angle: 35 mm vs 28 mm
  • Significantly larger: Compact (90×65×32 mm) vs Super compact (99×58×19 mm)
  • Much thicker: 1.3" vs 0.7"

common strengths of the Z1275 and M575

  • Each has a built-in flash

compared toUltra compact competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Kodak M575 compared to ultra compact competitors include: it has a slightly larger screen (3" vs 2.7").

However, on average it doesn't have image stabilization (none vs lens).

Canon PowerShot SD1400 IS

Canon PowerShot SD1400 IS
similar age
$299

Significant advantages of the SD1400 IS (vs the M575)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the SD1400 IS (vs the M575)

  • None found

common strengths of the SD1400 IS and M575

  • None found

compared toEntry-level DSLR competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Kodak M575 compared to entry-level DSLR competitors include: it is much smaller (super compact (99×58×19 mm) vs professional size (133×100×79 mm)), is much less expensive ($408.41 vs $1,232.08), is thinner (0.7" vs 3.1") and is much lighter (152 g vs 575 g).

However, on average it records lower quality movies (720p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps), has a much lower resolution screen (230k dots vs 1,040k dots), takes much lower resolution photos (9.8 MP vs 17.9 MP), doesn't have a touch screen and doesn't record movies in 24p.

Canon Rebel T4i

Canon Rebel T4i
2 years newer
$1,232 18-55mm lens

Significant advantages of the T4i (vs the M575)

  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs 720p @ 30fps
  • Much higher resolution screen: 1,040k dots vs 230k dots
  • Has a viewfinder: Pentamirror vs None

Significant disadvantages of the T4i (vs the M575)

  • Much larger: Professional size (133×100×79 mm) vs Super compact (99×58×19 mm)
  • Much thicker: 3.1" vs 0.7"
  • Much heavier: 575 g vs 152 g

common strengths of the T4i and M575

  • None found

compared toTravel zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Kodak M575 compared to travel zoom competitors include: it is slightly smaller (super compact (99×58×19 mm) vs compact (105×59×28 mm)), is thinner (0.7" vs 1.1") and is slightly lighter (152 g vs 193 g).

However, on average it has slightly less zoom (5x vs 20x), has a much narrower wide angle lens (28 mm vs 24 mm), has a slightly lower resolution screen (230k dots vs 460k dots), doesn't have image stabilization (none vs lens) and has a CCD-family sensor (CCD vs CMOS).

Panasonic Lumix ZS25

Panasonic Lumix ZS25
3 years newer

Significant advantages of the ZS25 (vs the M575)

  • Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 28 mm
  • Image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs None
  • Has a CMOS-family sensor: CMOS vs CCD

Significant disadvantages of the ZS25 (vs the M575)

  • Larger: Compact (105×59×28 mm) vs Super compact (99×58×19 mm)
  • Significantly thicker: 1.1" vs 0.7"

common strengths of the ZS25 and M575

  • Very small: Compact (105×59×28 mm) vs Super compact (99×58×19 mm)
  • Very thin: 1.1" vs 0.7"
  • Very light: 193 g vs 152 g