As well as being compared against other compacts, the Kodak EasyShare M341 is also often compared to travel zooms. The Kodak EasyShare M341's top rivals come from Kodak (such as the EasyShare C143 and the EasyShare M530) and Canon (such as the ELPH 310 HS)

Competitor classes

compared toCompact competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Kodak M341 compared to other compact competitors include: it has a slightly wider aperture (f/3 vs f/4.6), has a slightly larger screen (3" vs 2.4") and is thinner (0.7" vs 1.2").

However, on average it doesn't have image stabilization (none vs digital), is older (july 2009 vs january 2010) and has a slower max shutter speed (1/1400 of a second vs 1/2000 of a second).

Kodak EasyShare C143

Kodak EasyShare C143
1 year newer
$100

Significant advantages of the C143 (vs the M341)

  • Significantly better wide angle: 32 mm vs 35 mm

Significant disadvantages of the C143 (vs the M341)

  • Larger: Compact (94×62×30 mm) vs Super compact (96×59×19 mm)
  • Much thicker: 1.2" vs 0.7"

common strengths of the C143 and M341

  • Each has a built-in flash
  • Thin: 1.2" vs 0.7"
  • Light weight: 172 g vs 135 g

Olympus T100

Olympus T-100
7 months newer

Significant advantages of the T100 (vs the M341)

  • Image stabilization:
    1. Digital
    vs None
  • Much faster max shutter speed: 1/2000 of a second vs 1/1400 of a second

Significant disadvantages of the T100 (vs the M341)

  • Much narrower aperture: f/4.6 vs f/3
  • Significantly smaller screen: 2.4" vs 3"

common strengths of the T100 and M341

  • Each has a built-in flash
  • Fairly small: Compact (93×60×23 mm) vs Super compact (96×59×19 mm)
  • Very thin: 0.9" vs 0.7"

Kodak EasyShare M530

Kodak EasyShare M530
5 months newer
$120

Significant advantages of the M530 (vs the M341)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the M530 (vs the M341)

  • None found

common strengths of the M530 and M341

  • Each has a built-in flash
  • Fairly small: Super compact (94×57×23 mm) vs Super compact (96×59×19 mm)
  • Very thin: 0.9" vs 0.7"

Kodak EasyShare M340

Kodak EasyShare M340
6 months older

Significant advantages of the M340 (vs the M341)

  • Much faster max shutter speed: 1/4000 of a second vs 1/1400 of a second

Significant disadvantages of the M340 (vs the M341)

  • None found

common strengths of the M340 and M341

  • Each has a built-in flash
  • Very small: Super compact (96×59×19 mm) vs Super compact (96×59×19 mm)
  • Very thin: 0.7" vs 0.7"

compared toTravel zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Kodak M341 compared to travel zoom competitors include: it is thinner (0.7" vs 0.9").

However, on average it has a much narrower wide angle lens (35 mm vs 28 mm), has a slightly lower resolution screen (230k dots vs 461k dots), doesn't have image stabilization (none vs LensSensor shift), has a CCD-family sensor (CCD vs CMOS) and is older (july 2009 vs august 2011).

Canon ELPH 310 HS

Canon ELPH 310 HS
2 years newer
$235

Significant advantages of the 310 HS (vs the M341)

  • Much better wide angle: 28 mm vs 35 mm
  • Image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    2. Sensor shift
    vs None
  • Has a CMOS-family sensor: CMOS vs CCD

Significant disadvantages of the 310 HS (vs the M341)

  • None found

common strengths of the 310 HS and M341

  • Very small: Super compact (96×57×22 mm) vs Super compact (96×59×19 mm)
  • Very thin: 0.9" vs 0.7"
  • Very light: 140 g vs 135 g