As well as being compared against other compacts, the Kodak EasyShare M320 is also often compared to ultra compacts and digicams. The Kodak EasyShare M320's top rivals come from Kodak (such as the EasyShare CX6330) and Olympus (such as the VG110)

Competitor classes

compared toCompact competitors

Generally, compared to other compact competitors the Kodak M320 has a much narrower wide angle lens (34 mm vs 24 mm), has a slightly smaller screen (2.7" vs 3"), has a slightly lower resolution screen (230k dots vs 461k dots), doesn't have image stabilization (none vs lens) and has a CCD-family sensor (CCD vs CMOS).

Canon PowerShot ELPH 110 HS

Canon PowerShot ELPH 110 HS
3 years newer
$389

Significant advantages of the ELPH 110 HS (vs the M320)

  • Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 34 mm
  • Image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs None
  • Has a CMOS-family sensor: CMOS vs CCD

Significant disadvantages of the ELPH 110 HS (vs the M320)

  • None found

common strengths of the ELPH 110 HS and M320

  • Each has a built-in flash
  • Fairly small: Super compact (93×57×20 mm) vs Super compact (97×60×21 mm)
  • Very thin: 0.8" vs 0.8"

compared toUltra compact competitors

Generally, compared to ultra compact competitors the Kodak M320 has a much narrower wide angle lens (34 mm vs 27 mm), is older (january 2009 vs february 2011), is slightly heavier (155 g vs 105 g) and has a slower max shutter speed (1/1400 of a second vs 1/2000 of a second).

Olympus VG110

Olympus VG-110
2 years newer

Significant advantages of the VG110 (vs the M320)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the VG110 (vs the M320)

  • None found

common strengths of the VG110 and M320

  • None found

compared toDigicam competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Kodak M320 compared to digicam competitors include: it has a significantly wider wide angle lens (34 mm vs 37 mm), has a much larger screen (2.7" vs 1.6") and is newer (january 2009 vs june 2003).

However, on average it doesn't have a viewfinder (none vs tunnel).

Kodak EasyShare CX6330

Placeholder
5 years older

Significant advantages of the CX6330 (vs the M320)

  • Has a viewfinder: Tunnel vs None

Significant disadvantages of the CX6330 (vs the M320)

  • Much smaller screen: 1.6" vs 2.7"
  • Significantly worse wide angle: 37 mm vs 34 mm

common strengths of the CX6330 and M320

  • Each has a built-in flash