Generally, some of the advantages of the Kodak CX7300 compared to super zoom competitors include: it is slightly smaller (mid size (104×65×40 mm) vs prosumer size (108×81×92 mm)), is thinner (1.6" vs 3.6"), is slightly lighter (162 g vs 490 g), is slightly less expensive ($119.00 vs $295.00) and has a faster max shutter speed (1/3200 of a second vs 1/1000 of a second).
However, on average it has a significantly smaller screen (1.6" vs 2"), doesn't have image stabilization (none vs lens), is older (february 2004 vs february 2006) and significantly shorter exposures (1/2 of a second vs 30 seconds).
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H2
2 years newer
$295
Significant advantages of the DSC-H2 (vs the CX7300)
- Image stabilization:
- Lens
vs None - Significantly larger screen: 2" vs 1.6"
- Significantly longer exposures: 30 seconds vs 1/2 of a second
Significant disadvantages of the DSC-H2 (vs the CX7300)
- Significantly thicker: 3.6" vs 1.6"
- Heavier: 490 g vs 162 g
- Much slower max shutter speed: 1/1000 of a second vs 1/3200 of a second
common strengths of the DSC-H2 and CX7300
- Fairly small: Prosumer size (108×81×92 mm) vs Mid size (104×65×40 mm)
- Light weight: 490 g vs 162 g
- Thin: 3.6" vs 1.6"