As well as being compared against other digicams, the Kodak EasyShare CX7300 is also often compared to super zooms and compacts. The Kodak EasyShare CX7300's top rivals come from Kodak (such as the EasyShare CX6200) and Polaroid (such as the Z2300 Instant Digital Camera)

Competitor classes

compared toDigicam competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Kodak CX7300 compared to other digicam competitors include: it has higher quality type of viewfinder (tunnel vs none) and has a faster max shutter speed (1/3200 of a second vs 1/2000 of a second).

However, on average it has a much smaller screen (1.6" vs 3") and is older (february 2004 vs june 2012).

Kodak EasyShare CX6200

Placeholder
8 months older

Significant advantages of the CX6200 (vs the CX7300)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the CX6200 (vs the CX7300)

  • Significantly slower max shutter speed: 1/2000 of a second vs 1/3200 of a second

common strengths of the CX6200 and CX7300

  • Light weight: 195 g vs 162 g
  • Both have tunnel viewfinders: Tunnel vs Tunnel

Polaroid Z2300 Instant Digital Camera

Polaroid Z2300 Instant Digital Camera
8 years newer
$88

Significant advantages of the Instant Digital Camera (vs the CX7300)

  • Much larger screen: 3" vs 1.6"

Significant disadvantages of the Instant Digital Camera (vs the CX7300)

  • No viewfinder: None vs Tunnel

common strengths of the Instant Digital Camera and CX7300

  • Inexpensive: $86.99 vs $119.00

compared toSuper zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Kodak CX7300 compared to super zoom competitors include: it is slightly smaller (mid size (104×65×40 mm) vs prosumer size (108×81×92 mm)), is thinner (1.6" vs 3.6"), is slightly lighter (162 g vs 490 g), is slightly less expensive ($119.00 vs $295.00) and has a faster max shutter speed (1/3200 of a second vs 1/1000 of a second).

However, on average it has a significantly smaller screen (1.6" vs 2"), doesn't have image stabilization (none vs lens), is older (february 2004 vs february 2006) and significantly shorter exposures (1/2 of a second vs 30 seconds).

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H2

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H2
2 years newer
$295

Significant advantages of the DSC-H2 (vs the CX7300)

  • Image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs None
  • Significantly larger screen: 2" vs 1.6"
  • Significantly longer exposures: 30 seconds vs 1/2 of a second

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-H2 (vs the CX7300)

  • Significantly thicker: 3.6" vs 1.6"
  • Heavier: 490 g vs 162 g
  • Much slower max shutter speed: 1/1000 of a second vs 1/3200 of a second

common strengths of the DSC-H2 and CX7300

  • Fairly small: Prosumer size (108×81×92 mm) vs Mid size (104×65×40 mm)
  • Light weight: 490 g vs 162 g
  • Thin: 3.6" vs 1.6"

compared toCompact competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Kodak CX7300 compared to compact competitors include: it has a faster max shutter speed (1/3200 of a second vs 1/1000 of a second).

However, on average it has a slightly narrower wide angle lens (37 mm vs 35 mm) and is significantly larger (mid size (104×65×40 mm) vs compact (98×51×38 mm)).

Samsung Digimax 301

Placeholder
similar age

Significant advantages of the Digimax 301 (vs the CX7300)

  • Significantly smaller: Compact (98×51×38 mm) vs Mid size (104×65×40 mm)

Significant disadvantages of the Digimax 301 (vs the CX7300)

  • Much slower max shutter speed: 1/1000 of a second vs 1/3200 of a second

common strengths of the Digimax 301 and CX7300

  • Each has a built-in flash
  • Light weight: 137 g vs 162 g
  • Both have tunnel viewfinders: Tunnel vs Tunnel