As well as being compared against other digicams, the Kodak EasyShare CX6230 is also often compared to compacts and travel zooms. The Kodak EasyShare CX6230's top rivals come from Canon (such as the PowerShot A3300 IS) and Samsung (such as the WB850F)

Competitor classes

compared toDigicam competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Kodak CX6230 compared to other digicam competitors include: it has a much wider aperture (f/2.8 vs f/4.5), is newer (june 2003 vs february 2001) and has a faster max shutter speed (1/1700 of a second vs 1/1000 of a second).

However, on average it has a slightly smaller screen (1.5" vs 1.6").

Fujifilm FinePix 2300

Fujifilm FinePix 2300
2 years older

Significant advantages of the 2300 (vs the CX6230)

  • Larger screen: 1.6" vs 1.5"

Significant disadvantages of the 2300 (vs the CX6230)

  • Much narrower aperture: f/4.5 vs f/2.8
  • Much slower max shutter speed: 1/1000 of a second vs 1/1700 of a second

common strengths of the 2300 and CX6230

  • Light weight: 240 g vs 225 g
  • Both have tunnel viewfinders: Tunnel vs Tunnel

compared toCompact competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Kodak CX6230 compared to compact competitors include: it has a viewfinder (tunnel vs none).

However, on average it has a significantly narrower wide angle lens (36 mm vs 28 mm), has a much smaller screen (1.5" vs 3"), is much larger (mid size (104×67×42 mm) vs super compact (89×57×21 mm)), doesn't have image stabilization (none vs lens) and is older (june 2003 vs january 2011).

Canon PowerShot A3300 IS

Canon PowerShot A3300 IS
7 years newer
$231

Significant advantages of the A3300 IS (vs the CX6230)

  • Much smaller: Compact (95×57×24 mm) vs Mid size (104×67×42 mm)
  • Much larger screen: 3" vs 1.5"
  • Much better wide angle: 28 mm vs 36 mm

Significant disadvantages of the A3300 IS (vs the CX6230)

  • No viewfinder: None vs Tunnel

common strengths of the A3300 IS and CX6230

  • Wide aperture: f/2.8 vs f/2.8

Casio Exilim EX-Z500

Placeholder
2 years newer

Significant advantages of the EX-Z500 (vs the CX6230)

  • Much smaller: Super compact (89×57×21 mm) vs Mid size (104×67×42 mm)
  • Much larger screen: 2.7" vs 1.5"
  • Much thinner: 0.8" vs 1.7"

Significant disadvantages of the EX-Z500 (vs the CX6230)

  • No viewfinder: None vs Tunnel

common strengths of the EX-Z500 and CX6230

  • None found

compared toTravel zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Kodak CX6230 compared to travel zoom competitors include: it has a viewfinder (tunnel vs none).

However, on average it has slightly less zoom (3x vs 21x), has a much narrower wide angle lens (36 mm vs 23 mm), doesn't have a built-in GPS, has a much smaller screen (1.5" vs 3") and is much larger (mid size (104×67×42 mm) vs compact (110×62×25 mm)).

Samsung WB850F

Samsung WB850F
8 years newer
$826

Significant advantages of the WB850F (vs the CX6230)

  • Much better wide angle: 23 mm vs 36 mm
  • Much larger screen: 3" vs 1.5"
  • Much smaller: Compact (110×62×25 mm) vs Mid size (104×67×42 mm)

Significant disadvantages of the WB850F (vs the CX6230)

  • No viewfinder: None vs Tunnel

common strengths of the WB850F and CX6230

  • Wide aperture: f/2.8 vs f/2.8
  • Very light: 232 g vs 225 g