The Kodak EasyShare CX4230 is mostly gets compared to compacts. The Kodak EasyShare CX4230's top rivals come from Olympus (such as the D-435) and Samsung (such as the TL205)

compared toCompact competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Kodak CX4230 compared to compact competitors include: it has a viewfinder (tunnel vs none) and has a faster max shutter speed (1/1700 of a second vs 1/1500 of a second).

However, on average it has a much smaller screen (1.6" vs 2.7"), is much larger (mid size (115×66×40 mm) vs super compact (99×59×20 mm)), slightly lower maximum light sensitivity (200 ISO vs 3,200 ISO), is older (may 2002 vs january 2010) and is thicker (1.6" vs 0.8").

Olympus D-435

Placeholder
3 years newer

Significant advantages of the D-435 (vs the CX4230)

  • Much smaller: Compact (101×52×35 mm) vs Mid size (115×66×40 mm)
  • Much lighter: 140 g vs 280 g

Significant disadvantages of the D-435 (vs the CX4230)

  • No viewfinder: None vs Tunnel

common strengths of the D-435 and CX4230

  • None found

Samsung TL205

Samsung TL205
7 years newer

Significant advantages of the TL205 (vs the CX4230)

  • Much smaller: Super compact (99×59×20 mm) vs Mid size (115×66×40 mm)
  • Much larger screen: 2.7" vs 1.6"
  • Much thinner: 0.8" vs 1.6"

Significant disadvantages of the TL205 (vs the CX4230)

  • No viewfinder: None vs Tunnel

common strengths of the TL205 and CX4230

  • None found