The Kodak EasyShare C913 is mostly gets compared to other compacts. The Kodak EasyShare C913's top rivals come from Kodak (such as the EasyShare C143 and the EasyShare C813)

compared toCompact competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Kodak C913 compared to other compact competitors include: it is much smaller (compact (91×62×25 mm) vs compact (91×66×35 mm)), is newer (september 2008 vs january 2008), is thinner (1" vs 1.4") and is slightly lighter (137 g vs 187 g).

However, on average it has a slightly narrower wide angle lens (36 mm vs 32 mm), has a slightly smaller screen (2.4" vs 2.7"), is slightly more expensive ($449.95 vs $99.99) and doesn't support an external flash.

Kodak EasyShare C143

Kodak EasyShare C143
1 year newer
$100

Significant advantages of the C143 (vs the C913)

  • Significantly better wide angle: 32 mm vs 36 mm
  • Much larger screen: 2.7" vs 2.4"

Significant disadvantages of the C143 (vs the C913)

  • Much larger: Compact (94×62×30 mm) vs Compact (91×62×25 mm)

common strengths of the C143 and C913

  • Very small: Compact (94×62×30 mm) vs Compact (91×62×25 mm)
  • Very light: 172 g vs 137 g
  • Thin: 1.2" vs 1"

Kodak EasyShare C813

Kodak EasyShare C813
8 months older

Significant advantages of the C813 (vs the C913)

  • Supports an external flash

Significant disadvantages of the C813 (vs the C913)

  • Much larger: Compact (91×66×37 mm) vs Compact (91×62×25 mm)
  • Much thicker: 1.5" vs 1"
  • Significantly heavier: 187 g vs 137 g

common strengths of the C813 and C913

  • Wide aperture: f/2.7 vs f/2.7
  • Light weight: 187 g vs 137 g

Kodak EasyShare C613

Kodak EasyShare C613
1 year older
$299

Significant advantages of the C613 (vs the C913)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the C613 (vs the C913)

  • Much larger: Compact (91×66×35 mm) vs Compact (91×62×25 mm)
  • Significantly thicker: 1.4" vs 1"
  • Significantly heavier: 187 g vs 137 g

common strengths of the C613 and C913

  • Wide aperture: f/2.7 vs f/2.7
  • Fairly small: Compact (91×66×35 mm) vs Compact (91×62×25 mm)
  • Light weight: 187 g vs 137 g